Individual assignment – I
Course: Advanced Strategic Management (20%)
Select one organization (preferably your current
organization or company) and start by describing what does
strategic management means, and background of your organization.
Then mention and evaluate its current visions, missions, and
values.
Then conduct SWOT analysis (External: Opportunities and
Threats) and Internal environment analysis (Strength and
Weaknesses) of the organization
Then prepare SWOT Matrix (3*3)
Finally prepare QSPM having three alternatives and suggest best
strategy to be pursued after matching results of environmental
scanning.
N.B: Submission date: 19/09/2015 E.C
Individual assignment II: (20%)
Download recently published article from Strategic Management Journal
(SMJ) and review it (within 3 pages only)! Then submit both full article and
reviewed document in hardcopy.
N.B. Copying from others will invalidate your result!
Use this guideline while reviewing an article:
1. Citation: Include full title, all authors (last name, initials), full journal title, year, volume
number, and page numbers.
2. Summary: Present summary of essential contents and main ideas
3. Study purpose: Was the purpose and/or research question stated clearly? A clear statement of
purpose or research questions helps you determine if the topic is important, relevant, and of
interest to you.
Does the author clearly define a research problem or topic?
Is its significance explained? Are core issues or research variables identified?
Is specialized terminology usefully defined?
4. Was relevant background literature reviewed? A review of the literature should be included
in an article describing research to provide some background to the study.
Does the author provide an adequate literature review?
Does it discuss current research on the problem, and help to situate the authors own
research?
Are the research objectives clearly stated? Are hypotheses or specific research questions
identified?
5. Methodology
Does the author clearly identify the research methodology and any associated limitations of
the research design?
Are participants described, including the method of sample selection if appropriate?
Are instruments adequately described, including issues of appropriateness, validity and
reliability?
Do any evident biases or ethical considerations arise in relation to the methodology?
Are the methods for measuring results clearly explained and appropriate?
6. Results
What are the author's major findings and conclusions? Have these been supported by the
author's analyses, arguments, findings or evidence? Has the author overlooked anything?
7. Discussion
Do the research results validate the author’s conclusions and/or recommendations?
8. References
Are references given (footnotes or bibliography)? What is the size of the reference section?
Are the references recent, important? How are the references used: for support, rebuttal, etc.?
9. Suggestion for future research: Does the author suggest areas for further research or
discussion?
10. Critics: strengths and weaknesses