0% found this document useful (0 votes)
91 views2 pages

Gcworld RRL

This document analyzes public opinion and policy changes regarding the legalization of same-sex marriage globally. It discusses how public support for same-sex marriage has increased in recent decades in many countries. As a result, several nations have legalized same-sex marriage through legislation or court rulings based on constitutional guarantees of equality and human rights. However, some countries still oppose legalization based on traditional views of marriage. The document references numerous academic sources on the topic to understand factors influencing policy changes and debate around same-sex marriage internationally.

Uploaded by

Alaiza duldulao
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
91 views2 pages

Gcworld RRL

This document analyzes public opinion and policy changes regarding the legalization of same-sex marriage globally. It discusses how public support for same-sex marriage has increased in recent decades in many countries. As a result, several nations have legalized same-sex marriage through legislation or court rulings based on constitutional guarantees of equality and human rights. However, some countries still oppose legalization based on traditional views of marriage. The document references numerous academic sources on the topic to understand factors influencing policy changes and debate around same-sex marriage internationally.

Uploaded by

Alaiza duldulao
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Public Opinion and Policy Change: Analyzing the Global Shift towards Legalizing Same-Sex

marriage.

Class Code and Schedule:6724 T/F (10:30-12:00)

Group No.8

Members:

Noto, Kenneth Bryl

Quinsay, Kyla Nadine

Duldulao, Alaiza

Galido, Lanz Laurenz

Bulong, Joaquin

References:

 Bernstein, M., & Naples, N. A. (2010). Sexual citizenship and the pursuit of relationship-
recognition policies in Australia and the United States. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 38(1–
2), 132–156. https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.0.0216
 Kolk, M., & Andersson, G. (2020). Two decades of same-sex marriage in Sweden: A
demographic account of developments in marriage, childbearing, and Divorce. Demography,
57(1), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-019-00847-6
 Lee, J. (2022). Same-sex marriage as social policy. Global Encyclopedia of Public
Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, 11803–11807. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-
030-66252-3_2665
 Winslow, M. P., & Napier, R. (2012). Third-person perceptions of legalizing same-sex marriage
scale. PsycTESTS Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/t12578-000
 Jeffreys, E., & Wang, P. (2017). Pathways to legalizing same-sex marriage in China and Taiwan:
Globalization and “Chinese values.” Global Perspectives on Same-Sex Marriage, 197–219.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62764-9_10
 Pettinicchio, D. (2012). Current explanations for the variation in same-sex marriage policies in
western countries. Comparative Sociology, 11(4), 526–557. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-
12341234
 Archibald, C. J. (2013). Is full marriage equality for same-sex couples next? the immediate and
future impact of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Windsor. SSRN Electronic
Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2312079
 Ho, M. (2018). Taiwan’s road to marriage equality: Politics of legalizing same-sex marriage. The
China Quarterly, 238, 482–503. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305741018001765
 Isailovic, I. (2018). Same sex but not the same: Same-sex marriage in the United States and
France and the universalist narrative. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 66(2), 267–
315. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avy027
 Moreira, A. J. (2012). We are family! Legal recognition of same-sex unions in Brazil. American
Journal of Comparative Law, 60(4), 1003–1042. https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2012.0006
 Encarnación, O. G. (2013). International influence, domestic activism, and gay rights in
Argentina. Political Science Quarterly, 128(4), 687–716. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.12138
 Sanders, S. (2012). The constitutional right to (keep your) same-sex marriage. SSRN Electronic
Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1903386
 Willetts, M. C. (2011). Registered domestic partnerships, same-sex marriage, and the pursuit of
equality in California. Family Relations, 60(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-
3729.2010.00638.x
 Vale de Almeida, M. (2012). Tripping over history: Same-sex marriage in Portugal (respond to
this article at http://www.therai.org.uk/at/debate). Anthropology Today, 28(3), 24–27.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8322.2012.00875.x
 Fingerhut, A. W., Riggle, E. D., & Rostosky, S. S. (2011). Same-sex marriage: The social and
psychological implications of policy and debates. Journal of Social Issues, 67(2), 225–241.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01695.x
 Cranmer, F. (2023). Strasbourg, Russia and the right to same-sex marriage. Ecclesiastical Law
Journal, 25(2), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x23000248
 Wolff, K. (2017). “I do, I don’t”: The Benefits and perils of legalizing same-sex marriage in the
United States—one year later. Humanities, 6(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/h6020012
 Portella Püschel, F. (2019). Same-sex marriage in the Brazilian Supreme Court: Legal reasoning
and the risk of a regressive turn. Novos Estudos - CEBRAP, 38(3), 653–665.
https://doi.org/10.25091/S01013300201900030008
 Fichera, M. (2016). Same-sex marriage and the role of transnational law: Changes in the
European landscape. German Law Journal, 17(3), 383–420.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200019817
 Montaño, D. E., Deguma, J. J., Deguma, M. C., Capuno, R. G., Ybañez, R. Q., Lumayag, C. G.,
Delos Reyes, N. R. (2022a). You and me against the world: Biographical narrative analysis on
same-sex couples’ experiences in the Philippines. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies,
11(1), 169. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2022-0015

You might also like