Factor Mobility Theory
Factor Mobility Theory
Trade Theories
Trade theory helps managers and government policymakers focus on three critical
questions:
Theory of Mercantilism
The concept of mercantilism (a zero-sum game) served as the foundation of economic
thought for nearly three hundred years (1500–1800).
It purports that a country’s wealth is measured by its holdings of treasure (usually gold).
To amass a surplus (a favorable balance of trade), a country must export more than it
imports and then collect gold and other forms of wealth from countries that run a deficit
(an unfavorable balance of trade).
Every inch of a country's soil be utilized for agriculture, mining or manufacturing.
All raw materials found in a country be used in domestic manufacture, since finished goods
have a higher value than raw materials.
A large, working population be encouraged.
All export of gold and silver be prohibited and all domestic money be kept in circulation.
All imports of foreign goods be discouraged as much as possible.
Where certain imports are indispensable, they be obtained at first hand, in exchange for
other domestic goods instead of gold and silver.
As much as possible, imports be confined to raw materials that can be finished [in the home
country].
Opportunity is constantly sought for selling a country's surplus manufactures to foreigners,
so far as necessary, for gold and silver.
No importation be allowed if such goods are sufficiently and suitably supplied at home.
Theory of Neomercantilism
Neomercantilism represents the more recent strategy of countries that use protectionist
trade policies in an attempt to run favorable balances of trade and/or accomplish particular
social or political objectives.
Neomercantilism is a term used to describe a policy regime which encourages exports,
discourages imports, controls capital movement and centralizes currency decisions in the
hands of a central government.
The objective of neo-mercantilist policies is to increase the level of foreign reserves held by
the government, allowing more effective monetary policy and fiscal policy.
The East India Company is one of the best examples of the collaboration of state and
merchants in exploiting market opportunities.
The benefits that occurred as a result were:
1. It slowly encouraged the evolution of regional into nation states;
2. A commercial class emerged which, in return for paying taxes, received state
protection in the form of monopolies and tariffs;
3. Once colonies were established, managing the transport of private goods and the
volume of trade enriched the imperialist states and provided both significant
employments for the general population and opportunities for upward class mobility
for the more enterprising individuals.
Assumptions:
1. Full Employment
The theories of absolute and comparative advantage both assume that resources are fully
employed.
2. Economic Efficiency
Often, countries also pursue objectives other than output efficiency. They may avoid
overspecialization because of the vulnerability created by changes in technology and by price
fluctuations or because they do not trust foreign countries to always supply them with essential
goods.
3. Division of Gains
Many people are concerned with relative as well as absolute economic gains. If they perceive
that a trading partner is gaining too large a share of benefits, they may prefer to forgo absolute
gains for themselves so as to prevent others from gaining a relative economic advantage.
4. Transport Costs
If it costs more to transport the goods than is saved through specialization, the advantages of
trade are negated.
5. Static's and Dynamics
The relative conditions that give countries production advantages and disadvantages change.
For example, the resources needed to produce coffee or wheat in either Costa Rica or the
United States could change because of advancements in and acceptance of genetically modified
crops. In fact, most trade today is due to acquired advantage; thus, technical dynamics cause
countries to gain or lose both absolutely and relatively.
6. Services
The theories of absolute and comparative advantage deal with products rather than services.
However, with a growing portion of world trade made up of services, the theories apply
because resources must also go into service production (eg, education, shipping services).
7. Production Networks
Both theories deal with trading one product for another. Increasingly, however, portions of a
product may be made in different countries. A company might conduct R&D in Country A,
secure components in Countries B and C, assemble final products in Country D, manage
finances in Country E, and carry out call-center services in Country F.
8. Mobility
For example, steelworkers might not move easily into software development jobs because of
different skill needs. Even if they do, they may be less productive than before.
Examples
Most large countries (such as Brazil, China, India, the United States, and Russia) import
much less of their consumption needs and export much less of their production output
than do small nations (such as Uruguay, Belgium, and Taiwan).
Assume that the normal maximum distance for transporting a given product is 100 miles
because prices rise too much at greater distances. Although almost any location in tiny
Belgium is within 100 miles of a foreign country, the same isn’t true for its two largest
neighbors, France and Germany. Thus, Belgium’s dependence on trade as a percentage
of its production and consumption is greater than the comparable figures in either
France or Germany, a fact that can be partially explained by the distance factor due to
country size.
B. Size of the Economy
While land area helps explain the relative dependence on trade, countries’ economic
size helps explain differences in the absolute amount of trade. Nine of the world’s top
10 exporters in 2012 were developed countries, and the only exception was China,
which is the world’s second largest economy. Similarly, developed countries account for
well over half of the world’s exports.
Example: Although United States’ dependence on either imports or exports is
comparatively low, it is the world’s largest trader (imports + exports).
According to the factor proportions theory, factors in relative abundance are cheaper than
factors in relative scarcity.
People and Land Factor-proportions theory appears logical In countries that have many
people relative to the amount of land, such as Hong Kong and the Netherlands, land price is
very high because it’s in such demand. Neither Hong Kong nor the Netherlands excels in the
production of goods requiring large amounts of land, such as wool or wheat.
Manufacturing Locations – In Hong Kong, clothing production occurs in multistory factories
where workers share minimal space, but it does not compete in the production of
automobiles, which requires much more space per worker.
Capital, Labor Rates, and Specialization - In countries where little capital is available for
investment and the amount of investment per worker is low, managers might expect to find
cheap labor rates and export competitiveness in products that need large amounts of labor
relative to capital. Such as Bangladesh.
Process Technology – The optimum location for production depends on comparing the cost
in each locale based on the type of production that minimizes costs there. Example: Rice
harvesting in Indonesia, where many manual laborers are employed, versus Italy, where
mechanized methods require few workers.
Product Technology - Manufacturing competitiveness depends largely on technology to
develop new products and processes. Most new products originate in developed countries.
Stage 1: Introduction: New products are introduced to meet local (i.e., national) needs, and
new products are first exported to similar countries, countries with similar needs, preferences,
and incomes. If we also presume similar evolutionary patterns for all countries, then products
are introduced in the most advanced nations. (E.g., the IBM PCs were produced in the US and
spread quickly throughout the industrialized countries.)
Stage 2: Growth: A copy product is produced elsewhere and introduced in the home country
(and elsewhere) to capture growth in the home market. This moves production to other
countries, usually on the basis of cost of production. (E.g., the clones of the early IBM PCs were
not produced in the US.) The Period till the Maturity Stage is known as the Saturation Period.
Stage 3: Maturity: The industry contracts and concentrates—the lowest cost producer wins
here. (E.g., the many clones of the PC are made almost entirely in lowest cost locations.)
Stage 4: Saturation: This is a period of stability. The sales of the product reach the peak and
there is no further possibility to increase it.
Stage 5: Decline: Poor countries constitute the only markets for the product. Therefore almost
all declining products are produced in developing countries. (E.g., PCs are a very poor example
here, mainly because there is weak demand for computers in developing countries. A better
example is textiles.)
Types of products abound for which production locations usually do not shift. Such
exceptions include the following:
1. Products with high transport costs that may have to be produced close to the market, thus
never becoming significant exports.
2. Products that, because of very rapid innovation, have extremely short life cycles, making it
impossible to reduce costs by moving production from one country to another. Some
fashion items fit this category.
3. Luxury products for which cost is of little concern to the consumer. In fact, production in a
developing country may cause consumers to perceive the product as less luxurious.
4. Products for which a company can use a differentiation strategy, perhaps through
advertising, to maintain consumer demand without competing on the basis of price.
5. Products that require specialized technical personnel to be located near production so as to
move the products into their next generation of models. This seems to explain the long-
term U.S. dominance of medical equipment production and German dominance in rotary
printing presses.
While capital is the most internationally mobile factor, short-term capital is the most mobile
of all. Capital is primarily transferred because of differences in expected returns, although
firms may also respond to government incentives.
Companies and private individuals primarily transfer capital because of differences in
expected return (accounting for risk). They find information on interest-rate differences
readily available, and they can transfer capital by wire instantaneously at a low cost.
Political and economic conditions affect investors’ perceptions of risk and where they prefer
to put their capital.
Companies invest abroad for the long term to tap markets, improve quality, and lower
operating costs.
Governments give foreign aid and loans. Not-for-profit organizations donate money abroad
to relieve worrisome economic and social conditions.
Individuals remit funds to help their families and friends in foreign countries.
PEOPLE
Some might immigrate to another country, become citizens, and plan to reside there for the
rest of their lives. MNEs may assign some to work abroad for periods ranging from a few
days to several years (usually to a place where they also transfer capital), while some
countries allow workers to enter on temporary work permits, usually for short periods. For
instance, most workers in the United Arab Emirates are there on temporary work permits.
Economic Motives - People work in another country largely for economic reasons.
Political Motives - For example, because of persecution or war dangers, in which case they
are known as refugees and usually become part of the labor pool where they live.
It may be difficult to distinguish between economic and political motives associated with
international labor mobility, because poor economic conditions often accompany repressive
and/or uncertain political conditions.
Substitution
When factor proportions vary widely among countries, pressures exist for the most abundant
factors to move to countries with greater scarcity. Thus, in countries where labor is relatively
abundant compared to capital, workers tend to be poorly paid; many will attempt to go to
countries that enjoy full employment and offer higher wages.
Likewise, capital tends to move away from countries where it is abundant to those where it is
relatively scarce. However, the inability to gain sufficient access to foreign production factors
may stimulate efficient methods of domestic substitution, such as the development of
alternatives for traditional production methods.
Example: Russia has a low population density and the most unfarmed arable land of any
country. Next door is China with the highest population and little available unfarmed land.
About 400 thousand Chinese are now working on Russian farms, and much of the output is
shipped to China.
Complementarity
Factor mobility via foreign direct investment may in fact stimulate foreign trade because of the
need for equipment, components, and/or complementary products in the destination country.
Alternatively, trade may be restricted by local content laws, or when foreign direct investment
leads to import substitution.