‘Australian Government 2° Department of Home Affairs 2 pu 21 November 2023 ‘Aries PURWANTORO PERUM ALMAHERA REGENCY BLOK 8-2 RT001/016 SUMBERSARI JEMBER JAWA TIMUR INDONESIA In reply quote: Client name Aries PURWANTORO Date of birth 21 March 1974 Date of visa application 04 November 2023 Application ID 1545675985 Transaction reference number EGPO61XFIX File number BCC2023/6353581 Visa application charge receipt number 9029117523 ‘Transmission method Email sent to [Link]@ [Link] Dear Aries PURWANTORO Notification of refusal of application for a Visitor (class FA) Visitor (Tourist) (subclass 600) visa Refused applicant | wish to advise you that the application for this visa has been refused on 21 November 2023 for the following applicant: (Client name [Aries PURWANTORO. Date of birth [21 March 1974 The applicant did not satisfy the provisions of the Migration Regulations 1994. The attached decision record provides detailed information about this decision as it applies to this applicant. Review rights There is no right of merits review for this decision Receiving this letter As this letter was sent to you by email, you are taken to have received it at the end of the day itwas transmitted, Questions about this decision We cannot consider your visa application any further. Daparimont of Hare AMS WEBSITE: [Link]Visa application charge The visa application charge which has already been paid can only be refunded in limited circumstances, regardless of the application outcome. A receipt for your payment is available through your ImmiAccount. Yours sincerely Anggita Position number: 60066127 Department of Home Affairs Department of Home AMS WEBSITE: [Link]‘Australian Government 2° Department of Home Affairs DECISION RECORD Application details Visa class Visitor (class FA) Visitor (Tourist) (subclass 600) Stream (main applicant only) Tourst Date of visa application (04 November 2023 Transaction reference number EGP061XFIX Application ID 1545675985 File number BCC2023/6353581 Visa application charge receipt number 9029117523 Client name |Aries PURWANTORO Date of birth [24 March 1974 (Client ID [78139913710 Visa subclass stream Tourist The applicant's claims The applicant has applied for the grant of a Visitor visa (subclass 600) to visit Australia for a temporary stay. Information and evidence considered | am a delegated decision maker under section 65 of the Migration Act 1958. In reaching my decision, | have considered the following: relevant legislation contained in the Migration Act and Migration Regulations 1994 © information contained in the Department's Procedural Instructions © documents and information provided by the applicant(s) © relevant information held on Departmental files Findings On the basis of all the information available to me, including the documents and information the applicant provided, | find that the oriteria for the grant of a Visitor (Tourist) visa in the Tourist stream are not satisfied Reasons | have assessed the application and the reasons for my decision are detailed below. ‘An application for a Visitor (Tourist) visa in the Tourist stream has been made by the applicant. Department of Home AMS WEBSITE: [Link]‘A visa cannot be granted unless the relevant criteria specified in the Migration Act and the Migration Regulations are satisfied. In this case, | am not satisfied that clause 600.211 in Schedule 2 of the Migration Regulations is satisfied. This clause provides that 600.211 The applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the visa is granted, having regard to: (@) whether the applicant has complied substantially with the conditions to which the last substantive visa, or any subsequent bridging visa, held by the applicant was subject; and (6) whether the applicant intends to comply with the conditions to which the Subclass 600 visa would be subject; and () any other relevant matter. In assessing whether or not the applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia, | have taken into account information provided in the application, the applicant's immigration history and compliance with previous visas. | have also taken into consideration any supporting documents as well as the applicant's personal circumstances, commitments, and incentive to return to their country of residence. My decision is based on the following factors You did not satisfy Subclause 600.211 of the Migration Regulations 1994, which reads that: The applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the visa is granted, having regard to (2) whether the applicant has complied substantially with the conditions to which the last substantive visa, or any subsequent bridging visa, held by the applicant was subject; and (b) whether the applicant intends to comply with the conditions to which the Subclass 600 visa would be subject; and (¢) any other relevant matter. Under policy when considering “any other relevant matter’, decision makers may take into account a wide range of considerations to determine whether an applicant genuinely intends a temporary stay in Australia. This may include, but is not limited to, the applicant's employment, economic and family circumstances, their credibility, the claimed purpose and Period of stay, and the applicant's previous travel history. In assessing these criteria, | have taken into account the information provided in your visa application form and the supporting documents provided. On balance, | find that you have not demonstrated sufficiently strong employment, economic, family or other commitments in Indonesia that would be sufficient incentive for you to return to Indonesia. | also find that you have not provided sufficient detail about your travel purpose in Australia that is sufficient to satisfy me that you are intending to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the visa is granted. You have not provided evidence of limited previous travel or demonstrated previous compliance with immigration laws in Australia or other countries with immigration legislation similar to that of Australia. | therefore place limited weight on previous international travel as Department of Home AMS WEBSITE: [Link]evidence that you will comply with your visa conditions and depart Australia within the validity of your visa. In light of the above considerations, | am not satisfied that you genuinely intend to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose you have stated, and therefore find that you do not satisfy Subclause 600.211 of the Migration Regulations 1994. After considering the information provided, | am not satisfied that the applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purposes set out above. Therefore, | am not satisfied that the applicant meets the relevant criteria in clause 600.211 in Schedule 2 of the Migration Regulations. Decision {As clause 600.211 is not satisfied, | find the criteria for the grant of a Visitor (Tourist) visa in the Tourist stream are not satisfied. Therefore, | refuse the application by the applicant for a Visitor (Tourist) visa in the Tourist stream. Yours sincerely Anggita Position Number: 60066127 Department of Home Affairs 21 November 2023 Department of Home AMS WEBSITE: [Link]Department of Home AMS WEBSITE: [Link]