0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views6 pages

Engineering Project Update

The Tunnel Cleaning Robot project has made substantial progress but is two weeks behind schedule and over budget. While 65% of 3D modeling and 75% of component design were achieved, challenges integrating the cleaning blazer and sourcing suitable materials have arisen. To address these issues, additional personnel were hired, work shifts were extended, and innovative material solutions are being explored. Going forward, the focus will be on completing 80% of modeling, finalizing component design, advancing the prototype to 60%, and beginning testing despite facing challenges.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views6 pages

Engineering Project Update

The Tunnel Cleaning Robot project has made substantial progress but is two weeks behind schedule and over budget. While 65% of 3D modeling and 75% of component design were achieved, challenges integrating the cleaning blazer and sourcing suitable materials have arisen. To address these issues, additional personnel were hired, work shifts were extended, and innovative material solutions are being explored. Going forward, the focus will be on completing 80% of modeling, finalizing component design, advancing the prototype to 60%, and beginning testing despite facing challenges.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Progress Report:

Detailed information of the Tunnel Cleaning Robot project

Boyuan Wu
Departments of Engineering, University of Ottawa
ENG1112: Technical Report Writing
Henri Feist
November 20, 2023
TO: Dr. Alixander Brown
Chief of Operation
FROM: Boyuan Wu
DATE: 19 November 2023
SUBJECT: Detailed information of the Tunnel Cleaning Robot project

Introduction and background information:


Dr. Brown, I am Boyuan Wu, appointed on January 10th, 2023, to lead the Tunnel Cleaning
Robot project. This project, set towill conclude on March 30th, 2024, aiming aims to develop an
innovative robotic machine for tunnel cleaning. This report gives detailed progress from January
15th, 2023, to November 19th. . At the moment, weWe have completed 50% percent of our
planned activities, particularly in finalizing the holder for the cleaning knifeblazer. Detailed
working schedule starting from Nov 28. 2023 is presented as Graph 1. Graph 1 presented the
detailed working schedule for this lazer and lazer holder problem starting from Nov 28. 2023.
However, we have encountered setbacks regarding the integration ofintegrating the blazer
component into the holder, necessitating an additional 150 dollars per unit for superior materials.
Consequently, our schedule has been extended by one week to address these challenges.

Graph 1. Working schedule start from Nov 28, 2023

Progress so far:
The project, envisioned to hit significant milestones in creating a novel cleaning tool, has
progressed well but with some detours from the original blueprint. Initially, we aimed to
complete 70% of the 3D modeling, fully design all major components, and reach 40% of the
prototype assembly. Presently, we'veWe’ve achieved 65% of the 3D modeling—slightly below
our target. However, we've excelled in designing the major components, surpassing our initial
aimwith a 75% completion rate, surpassing our initial aim. The prototype assembly is at 35%,
trailing behind our planned progress. We're implementing measures to address these delays and
maintain our innovation's momentum while adhering to the project's timeframe.

Problem encountered:

Graph 2. Model of Cleaning Blazer and Blazer Holder


Our project, centered around the development of an innovative cleaning tool, has encountered
significant challenges that require attention and strategic solutions. Two critical issues have
arisen, affecting our progress, and prompting us to reassess our approach.
The primary challenge revolves around the integration ofintegrating the blazer with its holder, a
crucial aspect of our tool's functionality. Unfortunately, this task has proven more intricate than
initially anticipated, resulting in a delay of approximately three weeks in our project timeline.
This delay has implications for subsequent phases and necessitates immediate action.
Furthermore, we've encountered material sourcing challenges exacerbated by the harsh operating
conditions within the tunnel. The tunnel environment is characterized by highHigh humidity and
corrosive gases characterized the tunnel enviroment. In response, we are actively researching
alternative materials while striving to keep costs within the initial budgetary constraints.
To counter the delay in prototype assembly resulting from the integration complexities, we've
implemented strategies to expedite progress. This entails the recruitment of additional personnel
and the introduction of extended work shifts to optimize productivity and recoup the time lost
during setbacks.
The cleaning knifeblazer component has proven to be a persistent technical challenge, and
addressing this issue remains a top priority. It plays a crucial role in the tool's effectiveness,
especially considering the environmental conditions within tunnels. These conditions are often
characterized by high humidity and the presence of airborne corrosive particles due to the
significant dirt and debris buildup.
Given the demanding circumstances of moisture and corrosiveairborne particles, we are actively
exploring innovative solutions to enhance the cleaning knifeblazer's performance and durability.
This Our method includes considering the adoption of advanced materials capable of
withstanding moisture and corrosion while maintaining sharpness. Additionally, we are exploring
creative design approaches to ensure that the cleaning knifeblazer operates effectively in these
challenging tunnel environments. Our aim isWe aim to create a cleaning tool that excels in these
conditions, ultimately improving the efficiency and effectiveness of cleaning operations.
We have read several articles of theon high-performance steel alloy. Graph 3 shows an
experimental data on the new steel alloyGraph 3 cited two experimental data of high-
performance steel alloys, which is quite sufficient tosufficient for our requirements.
In recognition of the complexity of these challenges, we are actively seeking the expertise of
professionals in the field of materials science to provide guidance and potential solutions.
Additionally, any assistance that can streamline our procurement process, such as establishing
strategic partnerships or optimizing our logistics, is being pursued to ensure timely access to
materials. Your contribution on this matter can be of great help.

Graph 3. Comparison of experimental data and extended Gurson model results for dynamic
tensile and shear tests. (a) nominal axial stress vs. axial strain curves of dynamic tensile tests for
three alloys (solid curves) compared with calibrated extended Gurson model simulation results
(dashed curves). Arrows indicate onset of necking; (b) nominal shear stress vs. shear strain
curves of dynamic shear tests for HSLA-100 and TRIP-120 (solid curves) compared with
calibrated extended Gurson model simulation results (dashed curves). It is known that Kolsky
bar experiments require wave reverberations in the sample before a homogeneous deformation at
approximately constant strain rate develops in the sample. Hence, the start of the stress vs. strain
responses predicted by numerical simulations was shifted to compare with corresponding
experimental results; (c) FEA results for HSLA-100 dynamic tension failure as predicted by the
extended Gurson model; (d) FEA deformation results for HSLA-100 dynamic torsion failure as
predicted by the extended Gurson model.
Our overarching goal remains unwavering: to deliver a high-quality, innovative cleaning tool. By
addressing these issues proactively and seeking expert collaboration, we are confident in our
ability tocan overcome these obstacles and achieve our project's ambitious objectives.

Alteration of budget and time schedule:


In terms ofRegarding the project's overall timeline and budget, we need to catch up to the
original scheduleare currently two weeks behind the original schedule. From a financial
perspective, we have utilized 85% of our allocated budget, which calls for prudent financial
management in the subsequent stages of the project. Consequently, we have adjusted our
schedule, extending the design phase by two weeks and rescheduling the prototype testing phase.
We are also considering reallocating our budget to cover the additional expenses incurred.
Looking ahead, our focus will be We will focus on completing 80% of the 3D modeling,
finalizing the design of all components, and advancing the prototype assembly to 60%. Our
efforts will also be geared towards testing the operational efficiency under simulated conditions
and initiating preliminary field trials, ensuring that the project moves forward effectively despite
the challenges. faced.

Conclusion: Formatted: Font: 14 pt, Bold

The Tunnel Cleaning Robot project has shown substantial progress in 3D modeling and major
component design. Challenges in blazer integration and supply chain disruptions have been
addressed with proactive measures, including additional personnel and innovative material
exploration.
While we are two weeks behind schedule and have used 85% of the budget, we are adjusting by
extending the design phase and reallocating resources. We focus on achieving 80% of 3D
modeling, finalizing component design, and advancing prototype assembly.
Despite challenges, we are committed to delivering an innovative cleaning tool that enhances
tunnel maintenance. This project reflects our dedication to technological advancement and
project success. We appreciate your support and trust in our team.

Reference:
[1] Latourte, F., Wei, X., Feinberg, Z. D., de Vaucorbeil, A., Tran, P., Olson, G. B., & Espinosa,
H. D. (2012, June 15). Design and identification of high-performance steel alloys for structures
subjected to underwater impulsive loading. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 49,
1573-1587. [Link]
[2] Bjorhovde, R. (2004, March–May). Development and use of high-performance steel. Journal
of Constructional Steel Research, 60, 3-5. [Link]
[3] Seet, G., Yeo, S. H., Law, W. C., Burhan, Wong, C. Y., Sapari, S., & Liau, K. K. (2018).
Design of Tunnel Inspection Robot for Large Diameter Sewers. Procedia Computer Science,
133, 984-990. [Link]

You might also like