Developing the “Right” Modularization Decisions
for Mining Modules in China
IQPC Prefabrication & Modularization Conference, March 2013
Wang Junfeng & Tony Kretzschmar
Fluor China Engineering & Construction
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation 1
Fluor Reaching 100 Years:
A Business Milestone
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation 2
China Office Profile
Executing projects in China since 1978
More than 250 projects completed in
China
Strong FSR/FEED/PMC/EPCM/EPC
execution capabilities
9 Mega Projects executed during the last
decade
Fluor has worked with more than: Beijing
– 20 Class A China Engineering Shanghai
Companies
– 70 Super Class / 1st Class
construction companies
Current staff ~ 900+
Office Locations:
– Head Quarters, Shanghai Dawning
Center
– Beijing Lido Plaza
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation 3
Introduction
Modularization and prefabrication solutions have brought many
projects commercially and technically from dreams to reality
There are no end to the challenges in successful modular and
prefab solutions including proper design, prefabrication,
shipping, and installation
Successful offsite modularization and prefabrication needs a
new approach at all levels within the design, delivery and
installation activities
Insights into recent modular developments that target to
overcome the issues & challenges, from design innovations
throughout the course of each project from concept to
commission
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation
Modularisation & Pre-Assembly – Definition
Modularization is an
execution approach for
design, procurement,
contracting and
construction that shifts
site construction hours
away from the site
Includesskids, pre-
assemblies, entire process
structures, machines, and
other structures including
bridges
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation
Modularization & Pre-Assembly – Examples
What Are They?
Assemblies of process
plant components
Assembled at one
location (fabricator) and
transported to another Prefabrication Preassembly
(jobsite)
Made up of structure,
equipment, piping,
electrical, and
instrumentation
Made in a variety of
sizes Process Modules Offsite Fabrication
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation
Safety Drivers
Total Recordable
Fluor Managed Rate
1.80
Jobsite Construction 1.67
Work Hours: 1.60 Fluor Global
U.S. CII
2010: 20,916,315 1.40
Fluor China
2009: 16,487,350 1.20
1.23
1.16
2008 : 20,213,603 1.00
0.93
1.03
0.98
1.02
0.87 0.88
2007 : 2,664,611 0.80
0.72
0.68
2006: 11,934,729 0.60
0.64
0.58 0.57
0.64
0.5
0.46
2005: 24,953,635 0.40 0.37
0.42
0.28 0.28
2004: 50,811,158 0.20
0.17 0.18
0.23 0.22 0.23 0.24
0.13 0.12 0.12 0.1
0.02 0.02 0.04
0.00 0
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
# Fluor Self Perform & Subcontractor Combined Total Recordable Rate
* Calculated per 200,000 hours worked
Fluor projects in China meet Best-in-Class standards
7
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation
Cost Factors
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation
Cost Factors
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation
Sample Cost Comparison – Stick Built vs. Modularisation
Item Stick Built Modularisation Comment
Tradeworker Productivity Higher Shop environment more productive
Tradeworker Hours Reduced Higher productivity
Tradesworker All-In Labour Cost Reduced Lower overheads; low cost labor resources
Field Indirect Costs (Camps & Higher Fewer Tradesman on site
Catering)
Scaffolding Costs Higher More work above grade
Engineering Costs Higher More structural design; added project
management
Transportation Costs Higher Heavy haul/heavy lift costs
Material Costs Higher More structural steel
Project Contingency Higher Less risk factors in shop environment
Execution Flexibility Reduced Design and procurement frozen earlier
Material Surplus Neutral Neutral May be less with modular approach
Cost of Cash Higher Earlier spending
10
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation
Schedule Considerations
Key activities prior to the detailed design phase are:
Business Planning Phase
Recognize drivers
Collect Information related to the modular decision
Scope Definition Phase
Strategic evaluation – (simplified cost delta analysis, CII tool or similar)
Conceptual transportation, handling studies, maximum module size
Process considerations
Preliminary configuration studies
Cost delta evaluation (as described above) and labor requirements comparison
Schedule impact evaluation
Decide level of modularization/complex preassembly
Preliminary Engineering Phase
Develop procurement and contracting strategies
Develop fabrication strategies
Detailed transportation, handling studies
Sequencing studies and schedule evaluations
Finalize configurations, extent of modularization/offsite fabrication
Develop estimates, quantities, and schedules
Develop modular specifications and responsibility matrices
Finalize execution plan
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation
Environment/Socioeconomic Drivers
Environmental Footprint
• Does reduced footprint provide environmental value to company,
community, country?
• Does high peak craft levels create local environmental impact?
Socioeconomic Impact
• Does high peak craft levels create local negative or positive
socioeconomic impact?
• Is there a minimum local labour content requirement?
Standard Design
• Can the facility be standardized so that the design can be used for
duplicate facility
• Can we design one/build many?
12
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation
The Module and Prefab industry is maturing…
Trends:
• Modules are becoming more sophisticated, more being packed into them
• Dependence on fit for purpose materials and designs to drive down costs
• Start up times after module delivery minimized to deliver projects quicker
• Shipping solutions are very creative, nothing to big or too small
• Project & risk management overcoming challenges to deliver success
13
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation
Critical Considerations
Project Managers don’t like surprises, and should
pay special attention to the following critical items:
Engineering design schedules
Equipment & material deliveries
Shipment sequencing
Weather patterns along shipping route
Design Changes after start of module fabrication
Selection of module handling equipment
Control of fabricators’ activities
Weight management
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation
Mining Modules Case Study - Design
WEIGHT
Engineering Reserve ‘Not to Exceed’ Weight
Management Reserve Approved
Target Weight & Operators Reserve Design Changes
Design Margin Fabricator’s
Used Reserve
Weight Contingency Reported Weight
Reported
Weight ≤ Target Weight Module
Weighing
Steady Reported
Calculated Weight
Weight throughout the
End of FEED project life cycle
Concept Phases Detailed Design & Procurement Fabrication Comm + TIME
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation
Fabrication & Material Management
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation
Shop Preassembly Fit-up
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation
Packaging and Packing
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation
Protected Transportation
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation
Unloading & Site Preassembly
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation
Storage & Site Installation
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation
Challenges - Common Threads
Multinational Execution
• Engineering / Design
• Fabrication
• Installation / Erection
Codes and Standards
• Design and fabrication to non familiar codes & standards
Materials Management
• Materials used in fabrication mostly from China
Shipping Logistics
• Sea and road transportation to final installation location
Media / Public Relations
• Sensitive to attention regarding “outsourcing” & “quality”
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation
Mitigating Risks
Risks are like an iceberg, some features are apparent, others
are hidden below the surface.
Alignment:
• technical
• cultural
• procedural
Communication:
• Communication
• Communication plan
• More Communication
• Even more communication
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation
Module Execution Roadmap
I. Develop Module Definition
• Transportation restrictions
• Design Criteria
• Modular Plot Plan (sizes, weights, quantities)
• Select transport and handling methods
• Assume location of module fabrication facility
• Determine facility/equipment requirements for
handling modules at both mod yard and site
• Finalize cost and schedule analysis (baseline)
• Document benefits and risks and confirm extent
of modularization
II. Award Critical Contracts
• Ocean transport
• Land transport
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation
Module Execution Roadmap
III. Develop integrated project execution plan
• Module setting sequence
• Module production durations
• Stowage plans for transport
• Assembly area and warehousing requirements
• Shop fab capacities and manpower curves
• Material delivery schedules
• Engineering drawing completion schedule
• Detailed procurement plans & procedures
• Establish milestone schedules
IV. Engineering Design & Procurement
• Perform design & procurement activities
• Incorporate transportation & handling requirements
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation
Module Execution Roadmap
V. Module fabricator selection
• Contracting philosophy
• Assess facilities, capacity and capabilities
• Award in timely manner
VI. Establish oversight organization & project controls
• Timely procurement activities
• Material tracking
• Fabricator performance measurements
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation
Conclusions
1. Modularization & Prefabrication will continue to be a viable, even
preferable solution, increasingly so due to globalization.
2. Modularization & Prefabrication will allow projects to proceed that
may have otherwise not been viable.
3. Modularization & Prefabrication puts to test Project Management
principals (planning, logistics, risk management, communication,
etc).
4. Modularization & Prefabrication must be an early decision in a
project, then project planning, communication and controls need
to follow suit for the strategy.
5. Alignment regarding technical, cultural and procedural gaps is
critical to success of project.
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation
Questions & Answers
The decision to modularize on a project is one that needs full
commitment, early on, from the entire project team including the client.
28
Copyright © 2012 Fluor Corporation