0% found this document useful (0 votes)
289 views11 pages

Logit vs Probit Models Explained

This document provides an outline for a presentation comparing the logit and probit binary choice models. It begins with an introduction to logit and probit regression. For the logit model, it describes the principles, estimation steps, and assumptions. For the probit model, it outlines the model assumptions and estimation steps. It then compares the key differences between the logit and probit models, noting they differ in their error term distributions. The document concludes with an application of these models in R and includes references.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
289 views11 pages

Logit vs Probit Models Explained

This document provides an outline for a presentation comparing the logit and probit binary choice models. It begins with an introduction to logit and probit regression. For the logit model, it describes the principles, estimation steps, and assumptions. For the probit model, it outlines the model assumptions and estimation steps. It then compares the key differences between the logit and probit models, noting they differ in their error term distributions. The document concludes with an application of these models in R and includes references.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Republic of Benin

University of Abomey-Calavi

(UAC)

Faculty of Agronomic Sciences

(FAS)

MASTER STATISTICS, ORIENTATION BIOSTATISTIC

BINARY MODEL: LOGIT AND PROBIT

Group 6

Members : Lecturer :
Boris BEHINGAN Dr. Ir. Epiphane SODJINOU
Auric DJENONTIN Agricultural Economist, Biostatistician

Elisé TOHO
July 2016
Outline
Introduction
1- Logit model..........................................................................................................................3
1-1- Principles......................................................................................................................3
1-2- Estimation of the Logit Model.....................................................................................4
1-3- Steps in estimating Logit Regression...........................................................................4
2- Probit model........................................................................................................................5
2-1- Assumption of the model.............................................................................................5
2-2- Steps involved in estimation of Probit Model..............................................................5
3- Logit versus probit...............................................................................................................6
4- Application in R...................................................................................................................7
Conclusion................................................................................................................................10
References.................................................................................................................................11

2
Introduction
There are certains type of regression models in which the dependant or response variable is
dichotomous in nature, taking a 1 or 0 value. There are special estimation associated with
such models. The most commonly used approachs to estimating such models are: the linear
probability model, the logit model and the probit model. But we will develop here the logit
and probit models. In the first part we will try to explain the theoretical aspect of probit and
logit regression followed by their application in R.

1- Logit model
1-1- Principles
Logit regression (logit) analysis is a uni/multivariate technic which allows for estimating the
probability that an event occurs or not, by predicting a binary dependent outcome from a set
of independent variables. In an example of home ownership where the dependent variable is
owning a house or nor in relation to income, the linear probability model can be write as:

Pi=E ( Y =1 ⋮ X i ) =β 1+ β2 X i

Where X is the income and Y=1 means that the family owns a house.

Let us consider the following representation of home ownership:

1 1
Pi=E ( Y =1 ⋮ X i ) = = (1)
1+ exp [ β1 + β 2 X i ] 1+exp ⁡(−Z i)

Where Zi =β 1+ β 2 X i

The equation (1) is known as the (cumulative) distribution function. Here Zi ranges from
−∞ ¿+∞ ; Pi ranges between 0 and 1.

1
Pi is the probability of owning a house and is given by: . Then the probability of
1+ exp ⁡(−Z i )
1
not owning a house is (1- Pi)¿ .
1+ exp ⁡(Z i)

Pi 1+ exp ⁡(Z i)
Then we can define the odd ration as in favour of owning a house = (2).
(1−P i) 1+ exp ⁡(−Z i)

3
Taking the natural log of (2) we can obtain the Logit L which is:

Li=ln [ Pi /(1−Pi ) ]=Zi =¿ β 1+ β2 X i (3)

- As P goes from 0 to 1, the logit L goes from −∞ ¿+∞ . That is, although the
probabilities lie between 0 and 1, the logits is not bounded.
- Although L is linear in X, the probabilities themselves are not.
- The interpretation of the logit model is as follows, β 2 the slope, measures the change
in L for a unit change in [Link] tells how the log odds in favour of owning a house
change as income changes by a unit. The intercept β 1 is the value of the log odds in
favour of owning a house if income is zero.

1-2- Estimation of the Logit Model


In order to estimate the logit model, we need apart from X i , the values of logit Li. We need to
ni
compute the estimated relative frequency: ^
Pi= . This relative frequency is an estimate of
Ni
true Pi corresponding to each X i . Using the estimated Pi, we can obtain the estimated logit as:

^Li=ln [ P ^ i ) ]=Z i= ^β 1+ β^ 2 X i
^ i /(1− P

1-3- Steps in estimating Logit Regression


Step 1
ni
Compute the estimated probability of owning a house for each income level X i , as : ^
Pi=
Ni

Step 2
For each X i , obtain the logit as ^Li=ln [ P ^ i )]
^ i /(1− P

Step 3
Transform the logit regression as follows: √ W i Li=β 1 √ W i + β 2 √ W i X i + √ W i U i where

N i Pi
Wi= and U i is the non-normality of the disturbance.
1−P i

Step 4
Estimate (4) by OLS

4
Step 5
Establish confidence intervals and/or test hypothesis in the usual OLS framework.

2- Probit model
In order to explain the behavior of a dichotomous de pendent variable we have to use
suitably chosen Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF). The logit model uses the
cumulative logistic function. But this is not the only CDF that one can use. In some
applications the normal CDF has been found useful. The estimating model that emerges
from the normal CDF is known as the Probit Model.

Let us assume that in home ownership example, the decision of the ith family to own a
house or not depends on unobservable utility index I i, that is determined by the
explanatory variables in such a way that the larger the value of index I i, the greater the
probability of the family owning a house. The index I i can be expressed as I i=β 1+ β2 X i ,
where X i is the income of the ith family.

2-1- Assumption of the model


¿
For each family there is a critical or threshold level of the index (I ¿¿ i )¿, such that if I i
¿ ¿
exceeds I i , the family will own a house otherwise not. But the threshold level I i is not also
observable. If it is assumed that it is normally distributed with the same mean and
variance, it is possible to estimate the parameters of equation (5) and thus get some
information about unobservable index itself.

In probit analysis, the unobservable utility index I i is known as normal equivalent deviate
(n.e.d.) or simply Normit. Since n.e.d. or I i will be negative whenever Pi <0.5 , in practice
the number 5 is added to the n.e.d. and the result so obtained is called the Probit.

Probit = n.e.d + 5 = I i+ 5

In order to estimate β 1+ β2 , (5) can be written as

I 1=β 1+ β 2 X i +U i (6)

5
2-2- Steps involved in estimation of Probit Model
Step 1
Compute the estimated probability of owning a house for each income level X i , as in a case of
ni
Logit model: ^
Pi=
Ni

Step 2
Obtain the n.e.d from the standard normal CDF, I i=β 1+ β2 X i +U i

Step 3
Add 5 to the estimated I i to convert them into probits and use the probits thus obtain the
dependent variable in (6).

Step 4
The term of residual errors is heteroscedastic as in Logit models. In order to get efficient
estimates, one has to transform the model

Step 5
Estimate (6) by OLS

3- Logit versus probit


 The difference between logit and probit models lies in the assumption on the
distribution of the error term in the model. For logit model, the errors are assumed to
follow the standard logistic distribution while for the probit, the errors assumed to
follow a normal distribution.
 The logit function is similar, but has thinner tails than the normal distribution

6
Figure 1 : Logit and probit trend

Source : Harari-Kermadec, 2009

 Is logit better than probit, or vice versa? Both methods yield similar result. Preference
for probit or logit tends to vary by discipline. Logit is more popular in health sciences
like epidemiology. Probit model is popular in econometry and used by economists and
political scientists.
 Qualitatively, logit and probit models give similar results, the estimates of parameters
of the two models are not directly comparable. If we want to make β comparable in
logit and probit model there is an approximate relationship: Multiply probit.s β by
1.81 and it will be approximately the same as logit.s.

4- Application in R
The command use to performe logit or probit analysis is the function glm available in R. The
following syntax show how to run it.

# Import the data

7
mydata<-[Link]("[Link]",header=TRUE)

is the name of the data con y, x1, x2 and x3 where y is the dependent variable taking 0 and 1
as values the nit is dichotomous and x1, x2 and x3 are the explanatory variables

# Model

or probit <- glm (y~ x1 + x2 + x3, family=binomial (link="logit or probit"),


data=mydata)
summary (logit or probit)

# Use summary to get the result

Call:

glm(formula = y ~ x1 + x2 + x3, family = binomial(link = "logit"), data = mydata)

Deviance Residuals:

Min 1Q Median 3Q Max

-2.0277 0.2347 0.5542 0.7016 1.0839

Coefficients:

Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)

(Intercept) 0.4262 0.6390 0.667 0.5048

x1 0.8618 0.7840 1.099 0.2717

x2 0.3665 0.3082 1.189 0.2343

.
x3 0.7512 0.4548 1.652 0.0986

---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
(Dispersion parameter for binomial family taken to be 1)
Null deviance: 70.056 on 69 degrees of freedom
Residual deviance: 65.512 on 66 degrees of freedom

8
AIC: 73.512
Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 5

- The Pr (>|z|) column shows the two-tailed p-values testing the null hypothesis that the
coefficient is equal to zero (no significant effect). The usual value is 0.05, by this
measure none of the coefficients have a significant effect on the log-odds ratio of the
dependent variable. The coefficient for x3 is significant at 10% (<0.10).
- The z value also tests the null that the coefficient is equal to zero.
- The Estimate column shows the coefficients. When x3 increase by one unit, the
expected change in the log odds is 0.7512. What you get from this column is whether
the effect of the predictors is positive or negative.

# Here it is the sign of the coefficients which are important. It shows if y and x follow the
same direction. We also need to see the significance of the coefficient. For the exemple
only x3 is significant at 10%.

# The package mfx we can get the odd ratio by using the following command

library(mfx)

logitor(y_bin ~ x1 + x2 + x3, data=mydata)

And we get

Call:

logitor(formula = y_bin ~ x1 + x2 + x3, data = mydata)

Odds Ratio:

OddsRatio Std. Err. z P>|z|

x1 2.36735 1.85600 1.0992 0.27168

x2 1.44273 0.44459 1.1894 0.23427

.
x3 2.11957 0.96405 1.6516 0.09861

---
9
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

# We’ve seen that only x3 is significant at 10%. Then we will focus the interpretation of the
odd ratio on x3. When x3 increases by one unit, the odds of y = 1 increase by 112% (2.12-
1)*100. Or, the odds of y =1 are 2.12 times higher when x3 increases by one unit (keeping all
other predictors constant).

Conclusion
Binary models are used when the dependant variable or response variable is dichotomous
Logit and probit are the model used in this case. There are similar and the choice depend on
the discipline.

10
References

Torres-Reyna O., 2004. Logit/Probit models in R. Princeton University, 12p

Harari-Kermadec H., 2009. Econométrie 2 : données qualitatives, probit et logit. 7p.

Wooldridge M. J., [Link] Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. p: 453-460

11

Common questions

Powered by AI

In the context of the logit model, the odds ratio represents the factor by which the odds of the outcome are multiplied when the predictor variable increases by one unit. Specifically, if the odds ratio is greater than one, it implies that as the independent variable increases, the likelihood of the outcome being 1 (e.g., owning a house) increases . For instance, if an odds ratio is 2.12 for a variable x3, it means that for each unit increase in x3, the odds of the outcome increase by 112% [(2.12-1)*100].

In logit models, the cumulative distribution function used is the logistic function, which relates the probability of the binary outcome to the linear combination of independent variables . Conversely, the probit model uses the normal cumulative distribution function to establish the relationship between the binary outcome and the explanatory variables .

Residual deviance in a logit model evaluation measures the goodness of fit of the model to the observed data, with lower values indicating a better fit. By comparing it to the null deviance, which is the fit of a model with no predictors, one assesses the improvement due to the included variables. A substantial reduction from the null to residual deviance suggests a model that significantly improves the prediction over the null model .

To estimate a logit regression model using OLS, the following steps are involved: Step 1 involves computing the estimated probability of owning a house for each income level Xi. Step 2 requires obtaining the logit value for each Xi. In Step 3, the logit regression is transformed using the weights, allowing the model to be estimated through OLS. Step 4 entails applying OLS to estimate the parameters, and Step 5 involves establishing confidence intervals and/or testing hypotheses using the OLS framework .

To make the coefficients in logit and probit models approximately comparable, the coefficient (β) from the probit model can be multiplied by 1.81. This conversion is significant as it allows for a rough comparison between models' coefficients despite their different underlying assumptions and scales .

When choosing between a logit model and a linear probability model (LPM) for binary data analysis, key considerations include the preferred handling of probabilities and the distribution assumptions. A logit model is favored when probabilities need to be constrained between 0 and 1 without linearity, and when logistic distribution assumptions are justified. The LPM might be simpler computationally, but often results in predicted probabilities outside the 0-1 range and assumes linearity of the effect of predictors, which are significant drawbacks .

The choice between using a probit model over a logit model often depends on the specific field of application and the theoretical justification for the assumed error term distribution. While both models typically yield similar results, probit is preferred in fields like econometrics due to its basis in the normal distribution, which is a common assumption in many economic models. Logit, on the other hand, is more common in health sciences where the logistic distribution might be deemed more appropriate for modeling the odds .

In a logit model, the p-value indicates the statistical significance of the predictors. It tests the null hypothesis that the coefficient of a variable is zero, meaning it has no effect on the dependent variable. A p-value below a threshold (typically 0.05) suggests that the predictor significantly affects the probability of the outcome. In summary, the p-value helps determine whether or not to include a variable based on its estimated effect .

The main difference between logit and probit models lies in the assumption of the distribution of the error term. For the logit model, the errors are assumed to follow a standard logistic distribution, whereas for the probit model, the errors follow a normal distribution . In terms of application preferences, the logit model is more popular in health sciences like epidemiology, while the probit model is favored in econometrics and is used by economists and political scientists .

In the probit model estimation process, the normal equivalent deviate (n.e.d.) represents the unobservable utility index that influences whether the binary outcome occurs. It is used to derive the probit values by being transformed with an addition of 5, enabling the use of these values as the dependent variable in the estimation process .

You might also like