0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views34 pages

Credit Risk 5

This document discusses credit risk management in banking. It defines credit risk as the risk of loss due to a borrower or counterparty defaulting on financial obligations. The major sources of credit risk are discussed, including bank lending, money markets, securities, foreign exchange, and derivatives transactions. The document also distinguishes between direct and indirect credit risk, as well as pre-settlement and settlement risk. Key drivers of credit risk are identified as default probability, expected exposure at default, and loss given default. Credit ratings and definitions are also outlined. Criticisms of credit rating agencies are presented.

Uploaded by

tahatalmacc
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views34 pages

Credit Risk 5

This document discusses credit risk management in banking. It defines credit risk as the risk of loss due to a borrower or counterparty defaulting on financial obligations. The major sources of credit risk are discussed, including bank lending, money markets, securities, foreign exchange, and derivatives transactions. The document also distinguishes between direct and indirect credit risk, as well as pre-settlement and settlement risk. Key drivers of credit risk are identified as default probability, expected exposure at default, and loss given default. Credit ratings and definitions are also outlined. Criticisms of credit rating agencies are presented.

Uploaded by

tahatalmacc
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Credit Risk Management

Credit Risk
 Basic risk in banking
• Banks are in the business of credit intermediation
• Credit risk is a result of being in the business
 “...the major cause of serious banking
problems continues to be directly related to lax
credit standards for borrowers and
counterparties...”
Basle Committee on Banking Supervision, 2000
2
Credit Risk

► Sources of credit risk in different financial transactions


 Bank credits Non-payment by borrower

 Money market (bank deposits) Non-payment by borrower

Non-payment by issuer
 Securities transactions Failure to deliver / pay
Increase in probability of default

 Foreign exchange transactions Non-payment by seller


 Derivatives
►OTC transactions Failure to deliver / pay
►Exchange traded instruments No credit risk!

3
Credit Risk
•Definition
• Risk of loss due to
• default of the counterparty to fulfill its obligations in a financial
transaction (default risk)
• decrease in market value of an asset due to deterioration of the
borrower’s credit quality (increase in default probability/spread risk)

•Credit risk could be analyzed in two ways


• Direct vs. indirect credit risk
• Settlement vs. Pre-settlement credit risk

4
Credit Risk
Direct vs. Indirect Credit Risk
•Direct credit risk
• Credit risk arising from factors directly related to the
counterparty / borrower
• Risk of non-performance (default risk)
• Increase in the probability of default (downgrade risk)

•Indirect credit risk


• Probability of loss due to change in credit quality of a
third party
• e.g. increase in general credit spread in a particular rating class
without any change in a counterparty’s default probability

5
Credit Risk
Settlement vs. Pre-Settlement Risk

►All financial transactions involve a settlement process


 Counterparties fulfill their obligations in financial contracts, e.g.
make payment, deliver assets etc.

►There is a possibility that the settlement in a financial


transaction may not go through as planned due to the failure of
the counterparty to fulfill its end of the bargain (default)

►Default can occur either before or at the settlement date


 Pre-settlement credit risk
 Settlement risk

6
Credit Risk
Settlement vs. Pre-Settlement Risk
►Pre-settlement credit risk
 Failure of a counterparty to perform on an obligation
before settlement, i.e. from the time it is agreed upon until
settlement (before the initiation of the settlement)
►Non-defaulting counterparty is informed about the failure of its
counterparty and does not have to go through the settlement
process
►There still may be a loss for non-defaulting counterparty as it may
have to replace the transaction with another counterparty at a
higher cost relative to the original transaction
 Replacement Cost Risk

7
Credit Risk
Settlement vs. Pre-Settlement Risk
►Replacement cost risk
If the counterparty defaults before the
settlement date, failed transaction needs to be
renewed with another counterparty
There is a risk that the transaction has to be
renewed at a worse price
Replacement cost risk is related to the market
risk of the underlying asset
►Higher price volatility means higher replacement
cost risk

8
Example: Interest Rate Swap
Example: Interest Rate Swap
Example: Interest Rate Swap

Credit Risk !
Credit Risk
Settlement vs. Pre-Settlement Risk
►Settlement risk
 Default occurs at the settlement date
 Amount of loss depends on the type of settlement
►No intermediary
 The risk of losing principal amount due to failure of the
counterparty (Principal Risk / Herstatt Risk)
►FX transactions
►Delivery-Versus-Payment (DvP Settlement)
 No principal risk since clearing/settlement agent makes sure
payment is received before delivering assets or vice versa
 But there is still a residual risk in DvP settlement
►Replacement Cost Risk as in the pre-settlement risk

12
Drivers of Credit Risk
►Quantification of credit risk requires
identification of key risk drivers
Default probability
Expected exposure at the time of default
►Exposure can vary during the life of a transaction
►Exposure at the time of default could be quite different than
current exposure
Loss given default
►Actual loss could be different than exposure at default due
to recoveries

13
Default Probability
•Default probability is an estimation for the
likelihood of default of a counterparty within a
certain time period
• Ratings given by external credit rating agencies
• Moody’s, Standard & Poors (S&P), Fitch Ratings

• Historical default statistics


• Internal ratings
• Transition matrices between ratings classes

14
Rating Scales

15
Rating Definitions
Moody’s Ratings for Long-term Obligations
►Investment grade ratings
 Aaa - Obligations rated Aaa are judged to be of the highest
quality, with minimal credit risk.
 Aa - Obligations rated Aa are judged to be of high quality
and are subject to very low credit risk.
 A - Obligations rated A are considered upper-medium grade
and are subject to low credit risk.
 Baa - Obligations rated Baa are subject to moderate credit
risk. They are considered medium-grade and as such may
possess certain speculative characteristics.

16
Rating Definitions
Moody’s Ratings for Long-term Obligations
• Speculative grade ratings
• Ba - Obligations rated Ba are judged to have speculative elements and are
subject to substantial credit risk.
• B - Obligations rated B are considered speculative and are subject to high credit
risk.
• Caa - Obligations rated Caa are judged to be of poor standing and are subject to
very high credit risk.
• Ca - Obligations rated Ca are highly speculative and are likely in, or very near,
default, with some prospect of recovery of principal and interest.
• C - Obligations rated C are the lowest rated class of bonds and are typically in
default, with little prospect for recovery of principal or interest.
• S&P and Fitch uses an additional rating grade called “D” implying a default
has already occurred through either
• Non-payment of interest or principal when these payments are due
• Upon filing for bankruptcy or similar legal action
• S&P also assigns “SD” or selective default
17
Rating Definitions
•Moody’s assigns further numerical classifiers 1, 2 or 3 to
distinguish relative credit quality within a certain rating grade
except for “AAA”
• e.g. Aa1, Aa2, Baa3, Ba1 etc.
•S&P and Fitch use “+” or “-” signs for the same purpose
• e.g. AA+, AA, BBB-, BB+ etc.
•All rating agencies also assign an opinion, which is called
“Outlook”, regarding the likely direction of any medium-term
(around 1 year) rating actions
• “Positive” indicating the next move is likely to be an upgrade
• “Stable” indicating a change is not expected in the near to medium-
term
• “Negative” indicating the next move is likely to be a downgrade

18
Rating Definitions
•Credit-watch or Watch-list
• Rating agencies place borrowers under review by giving an indication
about their next move, which is likely to come in less than three
months
• S&P places borrowers under review with “positive”, “negative” or
“developing” implications
• Moody’s places borrowers under review (on Watch-list) for possible
upgrade, downgrade or direction uncertain
•Different rating classes for different sectors
• Sovereigns, financials, corporates, structured finance, insurance,
counterparty ratings
• They usually have similar rating scales
• But, does that mean similar risk levels for different instruments with
same credit ratings?
• AAA government vs. AAA CDO

19
Criticism Against Rating Agencies
►Rating agencies are usually late to change their
ratings, especially on downgrades
►There is an inherent conflict of interest in their
business model
 They are paid by the institutions that they rate
►They have played a role in the current crisis by
getting involved in the design of the structured
products, which are the main cause of the current
credit crunch
 They are accused of advising borrowers on how to
structure borrowing instruments to achieve a certain
credit rating

20
Criticism Against Rating Agencies

04/04/2012 Copyright (C) 2012 - Buket İmir / BA 4514 - Risk Management 21


Transition Matrix

Sovereign Foreign Currency Average One-Year Transition Rates


1975-2007*
Rating one year later (%)
Rating as of
January 1 # of counts AAA AA A BBB BB B CCC/CC SD
AAA 394 97.97 2.03 0 0 0 0 0 0
AA 228 3.51 94.3 1.32 0 0.44 0.44 0 0
A 213 0 4.23 93.43 2.35 0 0 0 0
BBB 187 0 0 8.56 87.7 2.67 1.07 0 0
BB 224 0 0 0 6.25 87.05 4.46 1.34 0.89
B 179 0 0 0 0 10.06 84.92 3.35 1.68
CCC/CC 18 0 0 0 0 0 22.22 38.89 38.89

*Source: Standard & Poor's Sovereign Ratings

22
Transition Matrix
Corporate Transition Matrix – Moody’s

23
Expected Exposure
•Exposure is amount at risk
• Refers to the maximum amount that can be lost if the risk
materializes
• Different than “Value-at-Risk” which is a risk measure for market
risk
• It changes depending on the type of transaction
•Expected exposure is the estimated exposure at the time
of default
• Expected exposure is usually different than current exposure
• For calculating expected loss, expected exposures are more
relevant than current exposures
• But they are not easy to estimate in some cases

24
Recovery Rate
•In some cases, credit losses are less than the
exposure at the time of default
• Seniority of loans – some creditors get paid
before others
•Historical recovery rates
• Risk mitigating techniques
•Netting agreements
•Receiving collateral and other guarantees
•Other risks need to be considered
• Legal risk, market and liquidity risk of collateral, etc.

25
Recovery Rate
•Recovery rates published by Moody’s

Source: European Corporate Default and Recovery Rates, 1985-2006 by Moody’s

26
Loss Given Default (LGD)
•LGD refers to the expected amount of loss given
a counterparty’s default
• LGD = Exp. Exposure * (1 – Recovery Rate)

•LGD and default probability are the inputs for


calculating “Expected Loss”
• Expected Loss = LGD * Default Probability

Risk Severity of loss Probability of occurrence

27
Measuring Credit Risk
► A simple measure of credit risk
Expected loss (EL)
►EL = D * X * (1 - R)
where
D: Probability of default
X: Expected exposure
R: Recovery rate
►The formula is quite simple, but getting the
parameters is not !

28
Expected Loss
•How good as a measure for credit risk ?
• Expected loss is not really a risk measure since it is the
amount of loss you would expect on average
• The argument is that if you expect it, you should account for it
• Loan loss reserves
• Pricing credit products

• Once expected losses are reserved for, the capital is required


only for losses beyond expected loss
•So we need a better measure that can help us
estimate the “Unexpected Loss ” rather than the
expected loss

29
Unexpected Loss
Credit Loss Distribution Probability

EL = E * D * (1 - R)

A simple approximation for Unexp. Loss:


WC(EL) = WC(E) * WC(D) * (1 – WC(R))

Confidence Level depends on the


targeted credit rating

Credit Losses
Unexpected Loss Expected Loss

Economic Capital

30
Unexpected Loss
►Using worst case scenarios is quite conservative
and unrealistic since it assumes
Correlations are 1
►Meaning that all borrowers default at the same time
 When exposures are the highest
 Recovery rate is the lowest
►A better risk measure for unexpected loss would be
related to return volatility similar to market risk
measure of Value-at-Risk

31
Loss Volatility
Portfolio of 3 Loans
Loss P robability P rob. Wtd. Loss P rob. Wtd. Sqrd Dev.
No Default o f A 0 95% 0 1.48
Default of A 25 5% 1.25 28.20
To tal 100% 1.25 29.69
Vo latility of A 5.45

No Default o f B 0 90% 0 8.10


Default of B 30 10% 3 72.90
To tal 100% 3 81.00

Vo latility of B 9.00

No Default o f C 0 80% 0 64.80


Default of C 45 20% 9 259.20
To tal 100% 9 324.00

Vo latility of C 18.00
Loss Volatility
Portfolio Loss Distribution
(Assuming defaults are independent)

Lo ss Pr o b ab i li t y C um. Pr o b . Pr o b . W t d . Lo ss Pr o b . W t d . Sq r d D ev.

No Default 0 68.4% 68.4% 0.00 120.08


Default of A o nly 25 3.6% 72.0% 0.90 4.97
Default of B o nly 30 7.6% 79.6% 2.28 21.32
Default of C o nly 45 17.1% 96.7% 7.70 172.38
Default of A & B only 55 0.4% 97.1% 0.22 6.97
Default of A & C only 70 0.9% 98.0% 0.63 28.99
Default of B & C only 75 1.9% 99.9% 1.43 72.45
Default of A, B & C together 100 0.1% 100.0% 0.10 7.53
T otal 100.0% 13.25 434.69

P ortfolio Loss Vo latility 20.85


Loss Volatility
Credit Loss Distribution
Expected loss: 13.25 mill $
80%
70%
60%
50%
95 percentile of cumulative loss distribution
40% Unexpected loss: 45 mill $

30%
20%
10%
0%
0 -25 -30 -45 -55 -70 -75 -100

You might also like