0% found this document useful (0 votes)
58 views2 pages

Fixed Point

1. The document discusses several examples of metric spaces and functions between metric spaces. 2. It examines whether the functions are contraction mappings and whether they have fixed points. 3. It also checks whether the spaces and functions satisfy the hypotheses of the Contraction Mapping Theorem to determine if the theorem can be applied.

Uploaded by

Minh Hằng
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
58 views2 pages

Fixed Point

1. The document discusses several examples of metric spaces and functions between metric spaces. 2. It examines whether the functions are contraction mappings and whether they have fixed points. 3. It also checks whether the spaces and functions satisfy the hypotheses of the Contraction Mapping Theorem to determine if the theorem can be applied.

Uploaded by

Minh Hằng
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

2

The University of Sydney 3. Let X = [1, ∞) and let f : X → X be given by f (x) = x + 1/x. Show that
Pure Mathematics 3901 d(f (x), f (y)) < d(x, y) for all x, y ∈ X with x 6= y, and show that f has no
fixed point in X.
Metric Spaces 2000 Solution.
This time the Contraction Mapping Theorem will not apply since it is not in
Tutorial 9
fact true that there is an α < 1 with d(f (x), f (y)) ≤ αd(x, y) for all x, y ∈ X.
(For all subspaces of R, use the usual (Euclidean) metric.) (So f is not a contraction mapping in the sense of the theorem.) It is clear
that x + (1/x) ≥ 1 whenever x ≥ 1 (since 1/x > 0), and so the formula does
1. Let X = (0, 1/4) and let f : X → X be given by f (x) = x2 . Prove that f define a function X → X. There is no fixed point, since x + (1/x) = x gives
is a contraction mapping with no fixed point in X. Reconcile this with the 1/x = 0, and hence 1 = 0. Now for x, y ≥ 1,
Contraction Mapping Theorem.
1 1
Solution. d(f (x), f (y)) = |(x − y)(1 − xy )| = d(x, y)(1 − xy ) < d(x, y),
A closed subset of a complete space is a complete space, but (0, 1/4) is not as claimed.
closed in R. And indeed it is not complete, since (for example) the sequence
(1/n)∞n=1 is a Cauchy sequence in (0, 1/4) which has no limit in (0, 1/4). 4. Let X = [1, ∞) and let f : X → X be given by f (x) = 2526 (x + 1/x). Show that
Completeness of the space is an important hypothesis of the Contraction d(f (x), f (y)) ≤ 25
26 d(x, y) (whence f is a contraction mapping). By solving
Mapping Theorem; since the hypotheses are not all satisfied here, the theorem the equation algebraically, show that 5 is the unique fixed point of f .
cannot be applied.
If 0 < x < 1/4 then 0 < x2 < 1/16 < 1/4; hence f (x) = x2 does define a map Solution.
from (0, 1/4) to (0, 1/4). The only solutions in R of x2 = x are x = 0 and d(f (x), f (y)) = 25 1 25
26 d(x, y)(1 + xy ) ≤ 26 d(x, y) (cf. Question 3). It is important
x = 1, neither of which lie in (0, 1/4). So f has no fixed points. Finally, if that the given formula does define a map X → X; so let us check that x ≥ 1
25
x, y ∈ (0, 1/4) then implies 26 (x + (1/x)) ≥ 1. If x ≥ 26 25 25
25 then 26 (x + (1/x)) > 26 x ≥ 1. If
1 ≤ x ≤ 25 then 26 ≤ x ≤ 1 and 1 + 26 ≤ x + x , giving 26 (x + x ) ≥ 1275
26 25 1 25 1 25 1
676 > 1.
|x2 − y 2 | = |x − y| |x + y| ≤ |x − y|(|x| + |y|) ≤ |x − y|( 14 + 14 ); Note that X is a complete metric space, being a closed subset of the complete
space R. So the Contraction Mapping Theorem guarantees that there is a
that is, d(f (x), f (y)) ≤ 21 d(x, y), which shows that f is a contraction mapping. unique x ∈ X with f (x) = x. In this case we can easily confirm this by just
solving the equation. If f (x) = x then 26 1 2
25 x = x + x , giving x = 25, so that
2. Let X = { x ∈ Q | x ≥ 1 } and let f : X → X be defined by f (x) = x2 + x1 . x = 5 is the only possible solution in X. (And f (5) = 5 is easily checked.)
Show that f is a contraction mapping and that f has no fixed point in X.
5. Let X = [0, 1] and let f : X → X be given by f (x) = 17 (x3 + x2 + 1). Show
Solution.
that d(f (x), f (y)) ≤ 57 d(x, y). Calculate f (0), f (2) (0), f (3) (0), . . . , and hence
The question asserts that given formula for f defines a mapping X → X; find, to three decimal places, the fixed point of f .
let us check that it is true. If x ∈ Q then x/2 ∈ Q and 1/x ∈ Q; so
(x/2) + (1/x) ∈ Q. If 1 ≤ x ≤ 2 then 1/2 ≤ 1/x ≤ 1 and 1/2 ≤ x/2 ≤ 1; so Solution.
(x/2) + (1/x) ≥ (1/2) + (1/2) = 1. If x > 2 then (x/2) + (1/x) > x/2 > 1. If 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 then 0 ≤ x3 + x2 + 1 ≤ 3, and so 0 ≤ 17 (x3 + x2 + 1) ≤ 37 < 1.
So if x ∈ Q and x ≥ 1 then (x/2) + (1/x) ≥ 1, as required. So again the question has not lied: we do have a function X → X. Now

If f (x) = x then (x/2) + (1/x) = x, which gives 1/x = x/2, and x = ± 2.
So f (x) = x has no solution in X. And if x, y ∈ X then d(f (x), f (y)) = 17 |(x3 −y 3 )+(x2 −y 2 )| = 17 d(x, y)|x2 +xy+y 2 +x+y| ≤ 57 d(x, y)

d(f (x), f (y)) = |(x − y)( 12 − 1


xy )| ≤ 12 d(x, y) whenever x, y ∈ [0, 1] (since x2 , xy etc. are all in [0, 1]). Again X is a
complete space, being a closed subset of R. According to my calculator:
since x, y ≥ 1 gives − 21 ≤ 12 − xy
1
< 12 . So f is a contraction mapping. (Again f (0) ≈ 0.142857, f (2) (0) ≈ 0.146189, f (3) (0) ≈ 0.1463565, f (4) (0) ≈ 0.1463650,
the space X is not complete.) . . . —but this is not a course in numerical analysis.
3 4

6. Let X = [1, 2] ∩ Q and let f : X → X be defined by f (x) = − 14 (x2 − 2) + x. Solution.


Rx Rx
Prove that f is a contraction mapping and that f has no fixed point in X. (i ) (F f )(x) − (F g)(x) = 0 (f (t) − g(t)) dt ≤ 0 d(f, g) dt ≤ x d(f, g).
Z x
Solution. (ii ) (F (2) f )(x) − (F (2) g)(x) = ((F f )(t) − (F g)(t)) dt
The space is not complete, of course. If X were defined simply to be [1, 2] 0
Z x
then the Contraction Mapping Theorem would apply; however, the solution x2
≤ td(f, g) dt = d(f, g).
of f (x) = x in [1, 2] turns out to be irrational, and so not in the set X as 0
2

actually defined. Indeed, f (x) = x if and only if x2 − 2 = 0, and this has no Thus d(F f, F g) = sup |(F f )(x) − (F g)(x)| ≤ sup x d(f, g) ≤ d(f, g), and
solution in Q. The quadratic − 41 (x2 − 2) + x has its turning point at 2, where x∈[0, 1] x∈[0,1]
the function value is 23 . So f (1) = 45 ≤ f (x) ≤ f (2) = 32 for all x ∈ [1, 2]. therefore
This confirms that f (x) ∈ [1, 2], as the question asserts. And it is also clear
x2
that x ∈ Q implies − 14 (x2 − 2) + x ∈ Q. For all x, y ∈ [1, 2], d(F (2) f, F (2) g) = sup |(F (2) f )(x) − (F (2) g)(x)| ≤ sup 2 d(f, g) ≤ 12 d(f, g).
x∈[0,1] x∈[0,1]

d(f (x), f (y)) = |x − y| |1 − 14 (x + y)| ≤ 12 d(x, y)


Hence F (2) is a contraction mapping. But F is not, since by taking f = 1
(since − 41 ≤ 1 − 14 (x + y) ≤ 12 ); so f is a contraction. and g = 0, we have d(F f, F g) = supx∈[0,1] x = 1 = d(f, g).

9. (Square
Pn Pnsum 2criterion) Show that if the n × n matrix C (over R) satisfies
7. Let f : [a, b] → [a, b] be differentiable over [a, b]. Show that f is a contraction n
c < 1, then for any b ∈ R the linear system x = Cx + b has a
mapping if and only if there exists a number K < 1 such that |f 0 (x)| ≤ Kfor j=1 k=1 jk
unique solution. (Imitate thepproof of Theorem 2.1 of Choo’s notes, using the
all x ∈ (a, b). Pn 2 ) instead of the one used there.)
Euclidean metric (d(x, y) = (x
i=1 i − y i )
Solution. Solution.
Suppose first of all that f is a contraction mapping. Then there exists K < 1 Define f : Rn → Rn by f (x) = Cx + b. Let x, y ∈ Rn and
such that |f (x) − f (y)| ≤ K|x − y| for all x, y ∈ [a, b]. So if x ∈ (a, b) is Pn put z = f (x)
and w = f (y). Then z − w = C(x − y), and so zi − wi = j=1 cij (xj − yj )
arbitrary, then for each i. Apply the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality (which says that the dot
product of two vectors in Rn is at most the product of their lengths—here
f (x) − f (y)
f 0 (x) = lim ≤ lim K = K. the two vectors in question
qP are q the i-th row of C and x − y). We de-
y→x x−y y→x n 2
Pn 2
duce that |zi − wi | ≤ j=1 cij j=1 (xj − yj ) . Squaring and summing
Pn n n n
Conversely, suppose that K < 1 and |f 0 (x)| ≤ K for all x ∈ (a, b). Then 2
P P 2
 P 2

on i gives i=1 (zi − wi ) ≤ i=1 Pj=1 cP ij j=1 (xj − yj ) . That is,
for arbitrary x, y ∈ [a, b] we have that f (x) − f (y) = f 0 (t)(x − y) for some n n
d(f (x), f (y)) ≤ Kd(x, y), where K = i=1 j=1 c2ij < 1. Thus f is a con-
t ∈ (x, y) ⊆ (a, b) (by the Mean Value Theorem). This gives traction mapping, and so has a unique fixed point.

|f (x) − f (y)| = |f 0 (t)| |x − y| ≤ K|x − y|,

as required.

8. Let C be the set of continuous functions [0, 1] → R, and let d be Rgiven by


x
d(f, g) = supx∈[0, 1] |f (x) − g(x)|. Define F : C → C by (F f )(x) = 0 f (t) dt
(for all f ∈ C). Show that for all f, g ∈ X and all x ∈ [0, 1],
(i ) (F f )(x) − (F g)(x) ≤ x d(f, g), and
x2
(ii ) (F (2) f )(x) − (F (2) g)(x) ≤ 2 d(f, g),
and deduce that F (2) is a contraction mapping. Show, however, that F is not
a contraction mapping.

You might also like