0% found this document useful (0 votes)
129 views6 pages

Responsibility Accounting for Performance Measurement

The document discusses responsibility accounting and concepts related to measuring performance in decentralized organizations. It covers types of responsibility centers, classifications of costs, benefits and costs of decentralization, measures of investment center performance like return on investment, and transfer pricing approaches.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
129 views6 pages

Responsibility Accounting for Performance Measurement

The document discusses responsibility accounting and concepts related to measuring performance in decentralized organizations. It covers types of responsibility centers, classifications of costs, benefits and costs of decentralization, measures of investment center performance like return on investment, and transfer pricing approaches.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING CONCEPTS AND TECHNIQUES for PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT

RESPONSIBILITY ACCOUNTING

RESPONSIBILITY ACCOUNTING – a system of accounting wherein costs and revenues


are accumulated and reported by levels of responsibility or by responsibility
centers within the organization.

Responsibility center (also called accountability center)

– a clearly identified part or segment of an organization that is


accountable for a specified function or set of activities.
– any part of the organization that a particular manager is responsible for

TYPES OF RESPONSIBILITY CENTERS:

a. Cost Center (or expense center) – a segment of an organization in which


managers are held responsible for the costs or expenses incurred in the segment.

b. Revenue Center – where management is responsible primarily for revenues.

c. Profit Center – a segment of the organization in which the manager is held


responsible for both revenues and costs.

d. Investment Center – a segment of the organization where the manager controls


revenues, costs, and investments. The center’s performance is measured in terms
of the use of the assets as well as the revenues earned and the costs incurred.

CLASSIFICATIONS OF COSTS IN RESPONSIBILITY ACCOUNTING

1. By responsibility center

2. By cost type, as to controllability

3. By specific cost items or cost elements within each classification in (1)


and (2).

RESPONSIBILITY vs. ACCOUNTABILITY

Responsibility has two facets, (1) the obligation to secure results, and (2)
the obligation to report back the results achieved to higher authority.

Accountability denotes the obligation to report results achieved to higher


authority.

THE CONCEPT OF DECENTRALIZATION

Decentralization refers to the separation or division of the organization into


more manageable units wherein each unit is managed by an individual who is given
decision authority and held accountable for his decisions.

• Goal congruence – all members of an organization have incentives to perform


for a common interest.

• Sub-optimization – occurs when one segment of a company takes action that is


in its own best interests, but is detrimental to the firm as a whole.
BENEFITS OF DECENTRALIZATION

1. Better access to local information

2. Cognitive limitations

3. More timely response

4. Focusing of central management

5. Training and evaluation

6. Motivation

7. Enhanced competition.

COSTS OF DECENTRALIZATION

1. Some decisions made in one sub-unit may bring about negative effect to the
other sub-units or the organization as a whole.

2. Decentralization necessitates a more elaborate reporting system hence, the


costs of gathering and reporting of data increase.

3. Job duplication or overlapping of functions is usually encountered in a


decentralized set-up.

MEASURING THE PERFORMANCE OF INVESTMENT CENTERS

Performance measures for investment centers usually attempt to assess how well
managers are utilizing invested assets of the division to produce profits by
relating operating profits to assets.

Return on investment (ROI) is the most common measure of performance for


investment centers. ROI can be defined as follows:

ROI = Operating Income


Average Operating Assets

Operating income refers to earnings before interest and taxes. Operating assets
include all assets acquired to generate operating income, including cash,
receivables, inventories, land, buildings, and equipment.

The ROI formula can also be broken down into the product of margin and turnover.
Margin is the ratio of operating income to sales. Turnover is defined as
sales divided by average operating assets.

ROI = Margin x Turnover

or

ROI = Operating Income x Sales


Sales Average Operating Assets

Three advantages of using ROI to evaluate the performance of investment centers:

1. It encourages managers to pay careful attention to the relationships among


sales, expenses, and investment, as should be the case for a manager of an
investment center.

2. It encourages cost efficiency.

3. It discourages excessive investment in operating assets.


Two disadvantages of using ROI are:

1. It discourages managers from investing in projects that would decrease the


divisional ROI but would increase the profitability of the company as a whole.
(Generally, projects with an ROI less than a division’s current ROI would be
rejected.)

2. It can encourage myopic behavior, in that managers may focus on the short
run at the expense of the long run.

Residual income (RI) - the difference between operating income and the minimum
peso return required on a company’s operating assets. The equation for RI can
be expressed as follows:

RI = Operating Income - (Minimum Rate of Return x Operating Assets)

ECONOMIC VALUE ADDED (EVA) – a more specific version of residual income. It


represents the segment’s true economic profit because it measures the benefit
obtained by using resources in a particular way.

After-tax operating income


(EBIT x[1 – Tax Rate]) xx
Less desired income
(After-tax WACC* x [Total assets – Current liabilities]) xx
Economic Value Added (EVA) xx

* WACC = Weighted average cost of capital

TRANSFER PRICING

TRANSFER PRICE – the monetary value or the price charged by one segment of a
firm for the goods and services it supplies to another segment of the same firm.

OBJECTIVES OF TRANSFER PRICING

1. To facilitate optimal decision-making.

2. To provide a basis in measuring divisional performance.

3. To motivate the different department heads in improving their performance


and that of their departments.

APPROACHES FOR DETERMINING TRANSFER PRICE:

1. Negotiated transfer price

2. Cost-based transfer price

3. Market-based transfer price

General Rules in Choosing a Transfer Price

• The maximum price should be no greater than the lowest market price at which
the buying segment can acquire the goods or services externally.

• The minimum price should be no less than the sum of the selling segment’s
incremental costs associated with the goods or services plus the opportunity
cost of the facilities used.

• A good should be transferred internally whenever the minimum transfer price


(set by the selling division) is less than the maximum transfer price (set by
the buying division). By using this rule, total profits of the firm are not
decreased by an internal transfer.

THE BALANCED SCORECARD: STRATEGIC-BASED CONTROL

The Balanced Scorecard is a strategic management system that defines a


strategic-based responsibility accounting system.

Strategy is defined as choosing the market and customer segments the business
unit intends to serve, identifying the critical internal and business processes
that the unit must excel at to deliver the value propositions to customers in
the targeted market segments, and selecting the individual and organizational
capabilities required for the internal, customer, and financial objectives.

The Balanced Scorecard translates an organization’s mission and strategy into


operational objectives and performance measures for four different
perspectives: the financial perspective, the customer perspective, the internal
business process perspective, and the learning and growth (infrastructure)
perspective.

Common characteristics of balanced scorecards

a. It should be possible, by examining a company’s balanced scorecard, to infer


its strategy and the

assumptions underlying that strategy.

b. The balanced scorecard should emphasize continuous improvement rather than


just meeting present standards or targets.

c. Some of the performance measures on the balanced scorecard should be non-


financial.

d. The scorecards for individuals should contain only those performance measures
they can actually influence.

e. The ultimate objectives of the organization are usually financial, but better
financial results cannot be attained without improving customers’ perceptions
of the company’s products and services. In order to improve customers’
perceptions of products and services, it is usually necessary to improve
internal business processes so that the products and services are actually
better. And in order to improve the business processes, it is necessary that
employees learn.

The balanced scorecard as a motivation and feedback mechanism. The performance


measures on the balanced scorecard provide motivation and feedback for
improving.

The Financial Perspective

The financial perspective establishes the long- and short-term financial


performance objectives. The financial perspective is concerned with the global
financial consequences of the other three perspectives. Thus, the objectives
and measures of the other perspectives must be linked to the financial
objectives. The financial perspective has three strategic themes: revenue
growth, cost reduction, and asset utilization.
Customer Perspective

The customer perspective is the source of the revenue component for the
financial objectives. This perspective defines and selects the customer and
market segments in which the company chooses to compete.

Process Perspective

To provide the framework needed for this perspective, a process value chain is
defined. The process value chain is made up of three processes: the innovation
process, the operations process, and the post sales process.

Cycle time is the time required to produce one unit of product.

Velocity is the number of units that can be produced in a given period of


time (e.g., units per hour).

Learning/Innovation and Growth Perspective

The learning and growth perspective is the source of the capabilities that
enable the accomplishment of the other three perspectives’ objectives.

SOME INTERNAL BUSINESS PROCESS PERFORMANCE MEASURES

a. Delivery Cycle Time. This is the total elapsed time between when an order is
placed by a customer and when it is shipped to the customer. Part of this time
is wait time that occurs before the order is placed into production.

b. Throughput (Manufacturing Cycle) Time. This is the total elapsed time between
when an order is initiated into production and when it is shipped to the
customer. It consists of process time, inspection time, move time, and queue
time. The only element that adds value is processing time. Inspection time,
move time, queue time, and their associated activities do not add value and
should be minimized.

c. Manufacturing Cycle Efficiency (MCE). MCE is the ratio of value-added time


(i.e., process time) to total throughput time. It represents the percentage of
time an order is in production in which useful work is being done. The rest of
the time represents non-value-added time (i.e., inspection time, move time, and
queue time).

Manufacturing Cycle Efficiency (MCE) can be found as follows:

Processing time
MCE =
Processing time + Move Time + Inspection Time + Wait time

QUALITY COST MEASUREMENT:

Quality-linked activities are those activities performed because poor quality


may or does exist. Costs of quality are costs that exist because poor quality
may or does exist.

Control activities are performed by an organization to prevent or detect poor


quality. Control costs are the costs of performing control activities. There
are two broad categories of control costs: prevention costs and appraisal costs.
Prevention costs are incurred to prevent poor quality in the products or
services being produced. Appraisal costs are incurred to determine whether
products and services are conforming to their requirements or customer needs.

Failure activities are performed by an organization or its customers in response


to poor quality. Failure costs are the costs incurred by an organization because
failure activities are performed. There are two broad categories of failure
costs: internal failure costs and external failure costs. Internal failure costs
are incurred because products and services do not conform to specifications or
customer needs and the nonconformance is detected prior to being delivered to
outside parties. External failure costs are incurred because products or
services fail to conform to requirements or satisfy customer needs and the
nonconformance is detected after being delivered to outside parties.

PRODUCTIVITY MEASUREMENT

Productivity – measures the relationship between actual inputs used (both


quantities and costs) and actual outputs produced.

Partial productivity – compares the quantity of output produced with the


quantity of an individual input used.

Partial Productivity = 𝑄𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑒𝑑


𝑄𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑑

Total Factor Productivity – the ratio of quantity of output produced to the


costs of all inputs used based on current period prices.

Total factor productivity = 𝑄𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑒𝑑


𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡𝑠 𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑑

Common questions

Powered by AI

Decentralization can lead to sub-optimization when segments or divisions make decisions beneficial to themselves but detrimental to the organization as a whole . This can be mitigated by aligning divisional objectives with overall corporate goals using performance measures that encourage common objectives, such as those provided by a Balanced Scorecard or a strategic-focused responsibility accounting system . Proper communication and incentive alignment at all levels can also help reduce conflicts of interest and support cohesive strategic execution .

The Balanced Scorecard integrates financial, customer, internal business process, and learning and growth perspectives to create a comprehensive performance measurement system linked to the organization’s strategic objectives . This integration ensures that financial goals are achieved through improved customer perceptions, which are in turn driven by superior internal processes and employee competence . The Balanced Scorecard motivates continuous improvement and aligns individual and organizational objectives with strategic priorities, facilitating feedback and better decision-making .

Transfer pricing can optimize decision-making and performance evaluation by ensuring that the internal prices of goods and services reflect their true economic value, facilitating optimal resource allocation . It provides a basis for measuring divisional performance, motivating department heads to improve performance . Additionally, by setting transfer prices through negotiated, cost-based, or market-based approaches, organizations ensure alignment with external market conditions, preventing profit manipulation and promoting fairness among segments .

Prevention and appraisal costs in quality cost management focus on reducing or eliminating the occurrence of defects. Prevention costs are incurred to avoid the occurrence of defects in products or services, while appraisal costs are related to assessing conformity to quality standards . In contrast, failure costs arise when defects occur, with internal failure costs incurred before delivery and external failure costs following delivery . While prevention and appraisal costs aim for proactive quality control, failure costs represent reactive measures, dealing with the aftermath of poor quality .

Manufacturing cycle efficiency (MCE) can be used to improve operational processes by identifying and minimizing non-value-added activities in the production cycle . MCE is calculated as the ratio of value-added processing time to total throughput time, highlighting inefficiencies in inspection, move, and queue times . By focusing on increasing MCE, organizations can optimize their operations, reduce waste, improve throughput, and enhance customer satisfaction through faster delivery times, thereby aligning with overall process improvement goals .

Advantages of using ROI include encouraging managers to carefully consider the relationships among sales, expenses, and investments, enhancing cost efficiency, and discouraging excessive investment in operating assets, promoting prudent asset utilization . On the downside, ROI may discourage managers from undertaking beneficial projects that could lower divisional ROI, and it can lead to short-term focus, neglecting long-term strategic goals .

Decentralization impacts responsibility accounting by creating distinct responsibility centers within an organization, thus dividing the entity into manageable units. Each unit is managed by a responsible individual who makes decisions and reports results, aligning decentralization with responsibility centers . Although decentralization allows for more local decision-making and improved management of responsibility centers, it can lead to sub-optimization where segments act in self-interest, contrary to overall corporate goals . Furthermore, decentralization requires an elaborate reporting system due to increased data and complexity, influencing the responsibility accounting practices .

While both residual income (RI) and economic value added (EVA) measure the true economic profit of a segment, RI is calculated as operating income minus the minimum required return on operating assets . EVA is a more specific version that adjusts for after-tax operating income and considers the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) minus current liabilities . EVA provides a clearer picture of the economic benefits realized by using resources beyond traditional profitability measures, emphasizing real value creation .

The classification of responsibility centers into cost, revenue, profit, and investment centers determines the extent and nature of managerial control by delineating the scope of responsibility . Cost centers focus control on cost management, revenue centers on sales generation, profit centers on balancing costs and revenues, and investment centers on maximizing returns from asset utilization . This classification allows managers to focus specifically on key areas of control, improving decision-making efficacy and operational performance within their designated scope .

Productivity measurement can be utilized in strategic decision-making by assessing the relationship between inputs and outputs to optimize resource allocation and improve efficiency . Partial productivity focuses on specific input-output relationships, aiding targeted improvements, while total factor productivity considers all inputs, providing a holistic view of resource utilization . These measures help inform strategies for cost reduction, resource optimization, and process improvements, aligning operational activities with the firm's strategic goals, and enhancing competitive advantage .

You might also like