0% found this document useful (0 votes)
957 views5 pages

Nursing Reflection Using Gibbs Cycle

This summary describes a situation where a nurse brought visitors onto an oncology ward without considering a patient's communication difficulties, causing distress. The writer reflects on how they could have intervened sooner and ensured the patient's needs were met. They realize the importance of considering individual needs, communicating effectively, and acting assertively when needed.

Uploaded by

Ahmed Yusuf
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
957 views5 pages

Nursing Reflection Using Gibbs Cycle

This summary describes a situation where a nurse brought visitors onto an oncology ward without considering a patient's communication difficulties, causing distress. The writer reflects on how they could have intervened sooner and ensured the patient's needs were met. They realize the importance of considering individual needs, communicating effectively, and acting assertively when needed.

Uploaded by

Ahmed Yusuf
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Gibbs Reflective Cycle Example

Author: Barclay Littlewood , Published: 14 February 2020, Modified: 9 July 2023


One of our expert writers has created this bespoke sample nursing reflective
practice that shows the quality that is guaranteed with every nursing paper ordered.
Secure your academic success and place an order today or view our services.

View a different grade Print Cite This


Critically reflect on an encounter with a service user in a
health care setting
This essay aims to critically reflect on an encounter with a service user in a health care
setting. The Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle will be used as this is a popular model of reflection.
Reflection is associated with learning from experience. It is viewed as an important
approach for professionals who embrace lifelong learning (Jasper, 2013). In general
terms, reflective practice is the process of learning through and from an experience or
activity to gain new understandings of self and/or practice (Bout et al., 1985; Jasper,
2013). This method is viewed as a way of promoting the personal and professional
development of qualified and independent professionals, eventually stimulating both
personal and professional growth (Jasper, 2013). Dating back to 1988, the Gibbs’
Reflective Cycle encompasses six stages of reflection which enable the reflector to think
through all the phases of an activity or experience (Gibbs, 1998). The model is unique
because it includes knowledge, actions, emotions and suggests that experiences are
repeated, which is different from Kolb’s reflective model (Kolb, 1984) and thus, the
model is wider and a more flexible approach in examining a situation in a critical light to
enable future changes (Zeichner and Liston, 1996).

1. Description
The incident I will be reflecting on occurred whilst I was placed on the oncology ward
during my first year of qualified nursing. We had an elderly service user on the ward,
who had been admitted due to stomach cancer. Upon his arrival, we read his notes
which highlighted that he had significant learning difficulties, meaning that he also had
problems with verbal communication. The main areas of reflection are how both myself
and the other nurses used communication to calm the patient and show compassion, as
well as how we adapted our care to address their individual needs. A nurse came onto
the ward with three members of the public, who were viewing the ward as part of a job
advertising process. When the nurse entered the patients bay, she informed the
members of the public that the service users in that bay were currently receiving
radiotherapy treatment. Upon hearing the nurse’s words, the service user became
overtly distressed and began crying, shrieking and hitting his head backwards against
his pillow –it took time; however, another nurse managed to calm him down by talking
in a soothing manner.

2. Feelings
Prior to the incident occurring, I was mindful that the nurse was showing the three
members of the public around the oncology ward, as part of a job advertising process.
At the time of the incident, I had only been working on the oncology ward for six
months so still felt slightly unsure of my position within the team. Ultimately, I did not
feel confident or experienced enough to deal with this situation independently. I think
that my increased level of anxiety meant that I struggled to intervene, however it is still
clear that both my colleagues and myself should have intervened more quickly to
ensure that the patient was dealt with effectively. Moreover, I was very surprised when
the nurse failed to take into consideration the individual needs of the service user
during the visit of the ward, as the distress caused to both the service user and the
members of the public was very unnecessary.

3. Evaluation
In hindsight, the experience had both good and bad elements which have led to an
increased understanding of the service user experience and my role as a nurse
practitioner within the oncology team. My role was to give physical examinations and
evaluate the service user’s health, prescribe and administer medication, recommend
diagnostic and laboratory tests/read the results, manage treatment side effects, and
provide support to patients – this includes acting in their best interests. I feel that I did
not fulfil the latter responsibility completely. This duty to protect service user’s full
confidentiality and ensuring that the nurse who was showing the members of the public
around the ward was aware of the service user’s communication difficulties and
resulting anxiety was not fulfilled. Our failure to act as a team, by sharing information
and stepping in before a situation escalated, shows that there was a low level of group
cohesiveness (Rutkowski, Gruder and Romer, 1983).

4. Analysis
According to the Nursing Times Clinical (2004), people with learning difficulties often
have a struggle with adapting to new situations, which means that there is a potential
for problematic behaviour when dealing with something outside of their comfort zone.
Nevertheless, as suggested by the Nursing Times Clinical (2004), healthcare staff should
be aware of how to effectively interact with people who have a learning disability and
this can be aided through regular and valuable reflection. Prior to admission into the
hospital, it is advised that professionals find out about the patient's communication and
their likes and dislikes; address any potential fears either through discussion or by
allowing the patient to visit the ward to meet the nursing staff (Nursing Times Clinical,
2004). Moreover, the day to day communication towards patients with learning
difficulties should involve patient-centred/holistic care in addressing patient needs,
which incorporates both verbal and non-verbal forms of communication. Therefore,
professionals should make eye contact, look and listen, allocate more time for the
patient, be interactive and communicative, remain patient and in some cases, enable any
professionals who may have had experience with people with a learning difficulty to
care for the patient (Nursing Times Clinical, 2004).

Get Help With Your Reflective Practice


If you need assistance with writing your reflective practice, our professional Reflective
Practice is here to help!

Find out more


MENCAP states that one of the most common problems when accessing healthcare for
people with learning disabilities is poor communication (n.d). This can be aided by
offering the service user an advocate to communicate on their behalf and by providing
information in a variety of ways including visual. They further this with the notion that
healthcare professionals should equally value all people, adapt their service so that it
meets different needs and understand that each individual will have different needs
(MENCAP, n.d). The Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) (2015) further this in 'The
Code', which states that all registered nurses and midwives must abide by the
professional standards which are to: prioritise people, practise effectively, preserve
safety and promote professionalism and trust. Therefore, the incident whereby another
nurse did not take into consideration the individual needs of the patient does not abide
by the professional code of conduct; ultimately, they did not recognise when the patient
was anxious or in distress and respond compassionately, paying attention to promoting
the wellbeing of the service user and making use of a range of verbal and non-verbal
communication methods (NMC, 2015). Compassion is one of the '6cs' introduced in
2012 - which are the values and behaviours that are viewed as the quality markers of a
health and care service - these being: care, compassion, competence, communication,
courage and commitment (Department of Health, 2012). The 6Cs carry equal weight and
should be a part of all service delivery - ensuring that patients are always placed at the
heart of the provision (DoH, 2012).

5. Conclusion
From this experience, I am now more mindful of the importance of being assertive and
exert professionalism in practice (and not feel as though I cannot do something because
of my position within the team or length of experience) if similar situations were to arise
in the future. The insight I have gained from this experience means that I am now more
aware of the implications of not acting immediately and the importance of acting in the
best interests of the patient, even when this may take courage. Strong working
relationships between healthcare professionals should also be given a greater emphasis
within the oncology ward, so to increase levels of group cohesiveness (Rutkowski,
Gruder and Romer, 1983).

Action Plan
In the future, I aim to be more proactive in dealing with a situation face on regardless of
my role within the team or level of experience; this includes dealing with a stressed
service user, ensuring that information is passed on to the relevant staff and intervening
when I believe that is a risk to a service user’s health or mental wellbeing. Moreover, I
will address the needs and alter how I approach a patient with learning difficulties in the
future by ensuring that I use the different methods of communication and undertake
some independent research on their specific needs; the information of which I can use in
my nursing practice.

I will not assume that other members of staff will always be aware or mindful of the
individual needs and/or triggers of a service user, and I will not presume that other
members of staff will always act in a wholly professional way. I will continue to
undertake regular professional reflective practice, using the on-going model proposed
by Gibbs (1988). I also aim to consistently and confidently implement the principles and
values as set out by the National League for Nursing, relating to the individual needs of
service users, these being:

 To respect the dignity and moral wholeness of every person without conditions
or limitation.
 To affirm the uniqueness of and differences among people, their ideas, values
and ethnicities. (National League for Nursing, 2017, n.d).

These are furthered by the National Health Service (NHS), which was created out of the
ideal that quality healthcare should be available to all and should meet the individual
needs of everyone.

Reference List
Boud, D., Keogh, R. and Walker, D. (1985) Promoting reflection in learning: a model. In D.
Boud, R. Keogh and D. Walker (eds.) Reflection: turning experience into learning.
London: Kogan Page.
Department of Health (DoH). (2012) Compassion in Practice. London: Department of
Health.

Gibbs G (1988) Learning by Doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Further
Education Unit. Oxford Polytechnic: Oxford.

Jasper, M. (2013) Beginning Reflective Practice. 2nd edition. Andover: Cengage.

Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and


development. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

MENCAP. (n.d) Communicating with people with a learning disability. Online. Available
at: [Link]
%20people_updated%20(1).pdf

National Health Service (NHS). (2015) Principles and values that guide the NHS. Online.
Available
at: [Link]

National League for Nursing. (2017) Core Values. Online. Available


at: [Link]

Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC). (2015) The Code. London: Nursing and Midwifery
Council.

Nursing Times Clinical. (2004) Managing the needs of people who have a learning
disability, Nursing Times 100 (10) pp. 28-29.

Oxford Brookes University. (2017) Reflective writing: About Gibbs reflective cycle. Online.
Available at: [Link]
writing-gibbs/

Rutkowski, G. K., Gruder, C. L., & Romer, D. (1983). Group cohesiveness, social norms,
and bystander intervention, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(3), pp.545-
552.

Zeichner, K. and Liston, D. (1996) Reflective Teaching: an introduction. New Jersey:


Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Regular reflection can enhance interaction with patients with learning disabilities by helping healthcare professionals to analyze their previous experiences, improve communication strategies, and develop a patient-centred/holistic care approach. Reflecting allows practitioners to identify areas needing improvement and adapt their methods to better cater to the individual needs and preferences of these patients, ultimately leading to improved care quality and patient satisfaction .

Understanding and addressing patients' unique needs are essential to providing effective care and ensuring a safe and comfortable healthcare experience. For patients with learning disabilities, it is crucial as it helps prevent miscommunication, avoids unnecessary distress, and enhances patient cooperation and recovery. Tailoring communication and care strategies according to individual needs supports the core values of dignity, respect, and personalisation in patient care .

Group cohesiveness significantly impacts the performance of healthcare teams; it influences how effectively team members communicate, coordinate actions, and support each other in stressful environments like an oncology ward. High cohesiveness promotes sharing critical information and ensures prompt intervention in patient care, improving overall team efficiency and patient outcomes. Conversely, low cohesiveness can result in miscommunication and delayed reactions, as evidenced by the incident involving a patient's distress .

Communication is critical in managing patients with learning disabilities, as it involves adapting interactions to meet individual needs. Effective communication can be enhanced by understanding patients' communication styles and preferences, using verbal and non-verbal strategies, allowing more time for interactions, and in some cases, involving experienced professionals. This approach ensures patient-centred/holistic care and aids in alleviating potential fear or anxiety related to unfamiliar environments .

Healthcare professionals can prepare for interacting with service users with learning disabilities by researching the patient’s communication preferences, fears, and preferences, possibly through prior discussions or visits. They should provide information in multiple formats and consider involving advocacy or experienced personnel. These steps ensure that professionals tailor their approach to reduce anxiety and provide patient-centred care from the outset .

The 6Cs framework—comprising care, compassion, competence, communication, courage, and commitment—serves as a quality benchmark guiding healthcare professionals' actions and decision-making. Its implementation promotes a patient-centred approach, ensures emotionally supportive interaction, and encourages the development of comprehensive care strategies that respect and meet individual patient needs, thus enhancing the overall quality of health services .

Gibbs' Reflective Cycle comprises six stages: Description, Feelings, Evaluation, Analysis, Conclusion, and Action Plan. Each stage supports systematic reflection by guiding individuals to describe the situation, evaluate their feelings, analyze the experience, conclude what else could have been done, and plan future improvements. This model emphasizes knowledge, emotions, and actions, encouraging repeat experiences and offering a broad approach to critically examine situations for enhanced learning and development .

'The Code' from the Nursing and Midwifery Council outlines key principles: prioritizing people, practicing effectively, preserving safety, and promoting professionalism and trust. It mandates that nurses must consider the individual needs of patients and respond compassionately, emphasizing the use of diverse communication methods. This framework ensures the provision of consistent, high-quality care and reinforces the need for nurses to act with integrity and respect in all situations .

Failing to respond promptly to a service user’s distress can lead to exacerbated anxiety or harm and may compromise patient trust and safety. In a healthcare context, delayed responses can disrupt clinical processes, escalate crises, and create a risk of non-compliance with professional standards and codes of conduct, which could lead to a deterioration in the quality of care provided .

Gibbs' Reflective Cycle uniquely integrates emotions and actions by including specific stages for reflecting on personal feelings besides evaluating and analyzing the situation (Feelings and Analysis stages). This integration allows practitioners to understand the emotional impact on their actions and how it influences their decision-making, enabling adjustments that can lead towards improved patient care and professional behavior .

You might also like