THE ECONOMIC STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT PROGRAMME (ESAP)
The ESAP program was implemented in Zimbabwe in1990 as a response to the country's economic
crisis .However, the program had a number of unintended consequences including increased poverty,
reduced public services,and deindustrialisation,
ESAP aimed to address Zimbabwe's economic woes by implementing a set of policy reforms focused on
achieving macroeconomic stability, promoting economic growth, and attracting foreign investment.
These objectives were critical for restoring confidence in the economy and setting the stage for long-
term development.
WHO PRESSURED ESAP.
: Several actors were involved in pressuring the Zimbabwean government to implement the
Economic Structural Adjustment Programme (ESAP).
1. International financial institutions: The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund
(IMF) played a crucial role in pushing for structural adjustment reforms in Zimbabwe. They
offered financial assistance in exchange for implementing reforms, which included liberalizing
the economy and reducing government spending.
2. Domestic elites: Many Zimbabwean political and economic elites supported the ESAP
program because they believed it would improve their economic position.
In addition to international financial institutions and domestic elites, other key actors who
pressured for the implementation of ESAP in Zimbabwe include:
1. Multinational corporations: Multinational corporations were interested in gaining access to
the Zimbabwean market and lobbied the government to implement reforms that would make it
easier for them to do business in the country.
2. Donor countries: Countries that provided financial assistance to Zimbabwe also pressured
the government to implement structural adjustment reforms. These countries included the
United Kingdom, the United States, and several European countries.
WHY DID THE GOVERNMENT INTRODUCED ESAP.
The Zimbabwean government introduced ESAP in the early 1990s for several reasons:These
reasons are economic crisis ,internation pressure,and to secure political legtimacy
1. Economic crisis: Zimbabwe was experiencing high inflation, low growth, and declining foreign
exchange reserves, which were causing economic instability. ESAP was seen as a way to
stabilize the economy and attract foreign investment.
2. International pressure: The World Bank, IMF, and other international financial institutions
were pushing for structural adjustment reforms in exchange for financial assistance.
3. Neoliberal ideology: The Zimbabwean government was influenced by the neoliberal
economic policies that were popular in the West at the time.
: Another important reason why the Zimbabwean government introduced ESAP was to secure
political legitimacy. After gaining independence in 1980, the government faced challenges from
political opposition groups, as well as internal divisions within the ruling party.
ESAP was seen as a way to gain international recognition and support from Western countries,
which would help to bolster the government's legitimacy and strengthen its position against
domestic opposition. However, the implementation of ESAP also led to increased dissatisfaction
and protests from the general population, which in turn, led to further political instability.
CAUSES OF ESAP
1. Multinational corporations: Multinational corporations were interested in gaining access to
the Zimbabwean market and lobbied the government to implement reforms that would make it
easier for them to do business in the country.
2. Donor countries: Countries that provided financial assistance to Zimbabwe also pressured
the government to implement structural adjustment reforms. These countries included the
United Kingdom, the United States, and several European countries.
1. Economic Crisis: Zimbabwe was experiencing an economic crisis at the time, with high
inflation, debt, and low foreign exchange reserves.
2. International Pressure: The international community, particularly the IMF and World Bank,
exerted pressure on Zimbabwe to implement structural adjustment reforms in order to receive
financial assistance.
3. Domestic Elites: Domestic political and economic elites were also supportive of ESAP, as they
stood to benefit from the reforms.
4. Structural Factors: Zimbabwe's colonial legacy and post-independence policies also
contributed to the implementation of ESAP, as the country was heavily dependent on
agriculture and had a weak industrial base.
5. Ideological Influences: The ideas of neoliberalism and structural adjustment programs were
popular in international development circles at the time, which may have influenced the
decision to implement ESAP in Zimbabwe.
POSITIVE EFFECTS OF ESAP
[Link] Stability: Achieving macroeconomic stability was crucial for creating a
conducive environment for investment and growth. ESAP targeted inflation reduction through
fiscal discipline, monetary tightening, and exchange rate adjustments, while also aiming to
improve the country's balance of payments position by reducing trade imbalances and reliance
on external borrowing.
2. Liberalization: ESAP introduced market-oriented reforms to liberalize various sectors of the
economy. This involved removing price controls, deregulating the financial sector, and easing
restrictions on foreign exchange transactions. By allowing market forces to play a greater role in
resource allocation, the aim was to improve efficiency and stimulate investment.
3. Privatization: State-owned enterprises (SOEs) were often characterized by inefficiency and
financial losses. Privatization under ESAP aimed to transfer ownership and management of
these enterprises to the private sector, where they could be operated more efficiently and
profitably. This was expected to improve productivity, reduce the burden on the government
budget, and attract private investment.
4. Currency Devaluation**: Devaluing the Zimbabwean dollar was intended to make exports
more competitive and reduce the trade deficit. By lowering the value of the currency relative to
other currencies, ESAP sought to encourage exports while discouraging imports, thereby
improving the country's external trade position.
5 Trade Liberalization: ESAP aimed to integrate Zimbabwe into the global economy by reducing
trade barriers and promoting exports. Lowering tariffs and simplifying trade procedures were
expected to increase market access for Zimbabwean goods and attract foreign investment.
However, concerns were raised about the potential negative impact on domestic industries that
were unable to compete with cheaper imports.
5. Fiscal Discipline: ESAP emphasized the importance of fiscal discipline to rein in government
spending and reduce budget deficits. Measures included cutting subsidies, rationalizing public
expenditure, and improving revenue collection. These efforts were aimed at restoring fiscal
sustainability and reducing the government's reliance on borrowing to finance its operations.
6. Monetary Policy Reform: Reforms in the monetary policy framework focused on enhancing
the effectiveness of monetary management and controlling inflation. This involved measures
such as tightening monetary policy to reduce money supply growth, enhancing central bank
independence, and improving exchange rate management.
7. Infrastructure Development :Recognizing the critical role of infrastructure in supporting
economic activity, ESAP included initiatives to improve infrastructure investment. This
encompassed projects in areas such as transportation, energy, water supply, and
telecommunications, with the aim of enhancing productivity, reducing transaction costs, and
facilitating economic growth.
8. Social Safety Nets: Acknowledging the potential adverse effects of reforms on vulnerable
populations, ESAP included provisions for social safety nets. These measures aimed to protect
the most vulnerable segments of society from the negative impacts of adjustment policies, such
as job losses or reductions in subsidies for essential goods and services.
9. Implementation Challenges: Despite its ambitious objectives, ESAP faced numerous
challenges during implementation. These included resistance from vested interests opposed to
reform, capacity constraints within government institutions, and social unrest resulting from
the adverse effects of reforms on certain segments of society, such as workers in privatized
industries or farmers affected by deregulation.
10. Criticism: ESAP attracted criticism from various quarters for its perceived failures and
negative consequences. Critics argued that the program exacerbated inequalities, increased
poverty, and failed to deliver on its promises of economic growth and development. Some also
criticized the pace and sequencing of reforms, as well as the lack of adequate social protection
measures for vulnerable populations.
11. Legacy: The legacy of ESAP in Zimbabwe is complex and multifaceted. While some reforms
laid the groundwork for long-term economic development, others contributed to ongoing
socio-economic challenges. ESAP's legacy continues to shape debates around economic policy
in Zimbabwe and serves as a reminder of the importance of careful planning and
implementation in the reform process.
12. Lessons Learned: The experience of ESAP offers valuable lessons for policymakers and
practitioners involved in economic reform efforts. These lessons include the importance of
designing reforms that are tailored to the specific context and needs of the country, ensuring
adequate social protection measures to mitigate the impact on vulnerable populations, and
building broad-based political support for reform programs to facilitate their successful
implementation and sustainability over the long [Link], let's expand on each of the
negative effects of ESAP in Zimbabwe:
NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF ESSAP
1. Increased Poverty: ESAP's austerity measures, such as reducing government spending and
cutting subsidies, led to a decline in real wages and purchasing power for many Zimbabweans.
This resulted in a significant increase in poverty levels, particularly among vulnerable
populations such as rural farmers, informal sector workers, and the urban poor. The removal of
price controls and subsidies on essential goods, such as food and fuel, also disproportionately
affected those already living in poverty, making it harder for them to afford basic necessities.
2. Unemployment: The privatization and restructuring of state-owned enterprises as part of
ESAP often resulted in downsizing or closure of these entities, leading to widespread job losses.
Many workers, particularly those employed in industries such as agriculture, manufacturing,
and mining, found themselves unemployed as a result of privatization, deregulation, and
increased competition from imported goods. The lack of alternative employment opportunities
exaerbated the problem of unemployment, especially among youth and unskilled workers.
3. Social Dislocation: ESAP's reforms, including the removal of subsidies and price controls, had
a significant impact on rural communities, where small-scale farmers relied heavily on
government support for agricultural inputs and marketing. The withdrawal of state support
disrupted traditional farming practices and livelihoods, leading to increased rural poverty and
migration to urban areas in search of employment opportunities. This migration contributed to
overcrowding in cities, strained urban infrastructure, and heightened social tensions.
4. Inequality: While ESAP aimed to promote economic growth and development, its benefits
were unequally distributed, leading to a widening gap between the rich and the poor. The
liberalization of the economy favored urban elites and large-scale commercial farmers who had
better access to resources and markets, while marginalized groups such as rural farmers,
women, and ethnic minorities faced increased economic marginalization and exclusion. This
widening inequality not only undermined social cohesion but also hindered efforts to achieve
sustainable and inclusive development.
5. Deterioration of Social Services: ESAP's emphasis on fiscal austerity and privatization resulted
in cuts to public spending on essential social services such as healthcare, education, and social
welfare. The introduction of user fees for healthcare and education services made access to
these services increasingly difficult for low-income households, exacerbating inequalities in
access to basic services. As a result, many Zimbabweans, especially those in rural and remote
areas, experienced deteriorating health outcomes, reduced educational opportunities, and
heightened vulnerability to poverty and social exclusion.
6. Loss of Economic Sovereignty: ESAP's reliance on foreign aid and investment to finance
development projects and stabilize the economy undermined Zimbabwe's economic
sovereignty and autonomy. The conditions attached to external assistance, such as structural
adjustment conditionalities imposed by international financial institutions, limited the
government's policy space and ability to pursue independent economic policies tailored to the
country's specific needs and priorities. This erosion of economic sovereignty constrained
Zimbabwe's ability to address its development challenges and pursue inclusive and sustainable
development strategies.
7. Rise in Corruption: The privatization of state-owned enterprises and liberalization of markets
under ESAP created opportunities for rent-seeking behavior and corruption, as well-connected
individuals and elites sought to profit from the sale of state assets and exploitation of newly
opened markets. Corruption became endemic in various sectors of the economy, undermining
governance, distorting market mechanisms, and exacerbating economic inequalities. The lack of
transparency and accountability in the privatization process also eroded public trust in the
government and institutions, further weakening the country's governance framework.
8. Erosion of Local Industries: Trade liberalization under ESAP exposed domestic industries to
competition from cheaper imported goods, particularly from global markets. This led to the
decline of local manufacturing and agricultural sectors, as local producers struggled to compete
with imported products that were often subsidized or produced more efficiently on a larger
scale. The loss of market share and competitiveness of local industries not only resulted in job
losses and income reductions but also undermined the country's long-term economic
development prospects by eroding its productive capacity and self-sufficiency in key sectors.
9. Environmental Degradation: ESAP's emphasis on promoting export-oriented growth and
attracting foreign investment often came at the expense of environmental sustainability. The
exploitation of natural resources, such as timber, minerals, and land, intensified under ESAP as
the government sought to generate foreign exchange and stimulate economic growth.
However, this led to deforestation, soil degradation, water pollution, and habitat destruction,
threatening biodiversity and ecosystem services. The lack of effective environmental
regulations and enforcement mechanisms exacerbated these environmental challenges, posing
long-term risks to Zimbabwe's ecological integrity and resilience.
10. Political Instability: The social and economic hardships resulting from ESAP's reforms
contributed to political instability and social unrest in Zimbabwe. Public dissatisfaction with the
government's handling of the economic crisis and perceived lack of accountability and
responsiveness fueled protests, strikes, and demonstrations across the country. The
government's heavy-handed response to dissent, including crackdowns on opposition groups
and civil society, further heightened tensions and eroded trust in democratic institutions. This
political instability and repression undermined investor confidence, hindered economic
recovery efforts, and perpetuated a cycle of social and economic instability in Zimbabwe.
REFERENCE
Brian Raftopoulos and Ian Phimister (2000): "Zimbabwe's 'Shimmering Possibilities': Crisis and
Contention," in African Affairs, Vol. 99, No. 393.
Sam Moyo (2001): "Zimbabwe's Structural Adjustment Programme and its Impact on the
Peasantry," in Journal of Contemporary African Studies, Vol. 19, No. 2.
Dambisa Moyo (2011): "Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way for
Africa," PublicAffairs.
Jens Andersson (2010): "Development Successes and Failures: A New Perspective on Africa's
Development," in African Affairs, Vol. 109, No. 435.
Margaret C. Lee (2004): "The Politics of Economic Reform in Zimbabwe," in African Affairs, Vol.
103, No. 411
Giovanni Arrighi (2005): "The Political Economy of Dollarization in Zimbabwe," in Review of
African Political Economy, Vol. 32, No. 105.
Gilbert Gwindingwi and Addison Kabuki (2003): "Public Expenditure and Pro-poor Growth in
Zimbabwe," in World Development, Vol. 31, No. 8.
