Private Developers in Harare's Social Housing
Private Developers in Harare's Social Housing
PROJECT TOPIC:
Done by:
Supervisor
I confirm that I worked with ……………………………………………………………………
[hand written]
as his/her supervisor and support the submission of this dissertation.
……………………………… ……………… …………
Signature of Supervisor Date
[Note: Dissertations not signed by a supervisor will not be accepted by the Department
as a quality control measure]
DEDICATION
ACKNOLEDGEMENTS
ABSTRACT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES AND DIAGRAMS
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF PLATES
CHAPTER 1
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Having access to decent, affordable housing is a major problem for many nations worldwide.
Delivering social housing, in particular, is essential to reducing housing disparities and
guaranteeing that people and families have access to secure and reasonably priced housing.
Social housing in Zimbabwe has historically been the province of the public sector and the
government. Nonetheless, the growing need for housing as the population grows has drawn a
lot of attention recently to the role played by private developers in the delivery of social
housing.
In addition, private developers can add to the overall supply of social housing units and meet
the growing demand for reasonably priced homes with their knowledge, resources, and
inventiveness. Their involvement generates significant issues and challenges that require
attention in addition to possible benefits and implications for the supply of social housing.
According to ZIMSTAT Housing and Population Census, 2022, the distribution of
households shows that Harare City had 653,562 households against the population of
1,491,740 hence the percentage of households was 17.1 in Harare City.
A description of the research methodology is included in this chapter. In addition to the issue
statement, research questions, objectives, and justification, it provides a brief overview of the
study. Therefore, this research sought to comprehensively assess the impacts and benefits of
private developers' participation in social housing delivery. By examining the role of private
developers, this study seeks to shed light on the potential advantages and challenges associ-
ated with their involvement, ultimately contributing to the ongoing discourse on effective
strategies for addressing the housing crisis.
1.2 BACKGROUND
Globally, the challenge of social housing delivery is being experienced by the residents and
solutions such as involving the private developers to assist in the delivery of social housing is
one of the measures which are being considered. Cities around the world are all faced with an
ever-growing population which upsets the balance between adequate housing provision and
the number of people in need of it. For instance, in Indonesia, Jarkata is facing the problem of
increasing population in the area which also has a population size of about 10 million
residents. With this densely populated, Jarkata has become the target for housing
development to accommodate the increasing population. However, this city already had a
land limitation issue, so the development was directed to vertical housing. Vertical housing
development also increases, due to land limitation issues (Budhiawan, 2017). One of the
vertical housing schemes in East Jakarta is Sentra Timur Residence.
Over the several past years, governments around the world have implemented multiple
methods to provide affordable housing, of which the private developers’ engagement or
involvement is the most recent iteration. Government starts with a front-line delivery role,
gradually retreats from delivery through structural adjustment in the 1980s and returns to a
more active role in the latter 2000s as the symbiotic scaling and de-risking roles of the private
and public sectors begin to be realized. Engagement of private developers based on a sizeable
amount of government subsidy and financial mechanisms that lower overall costs for the
private partner, and where both sectors jointly finance, own, and operate a low-income
housing project and share risk, have been used with great success, according to experience in
developed countries like the USA, Australia, Ireland, and the UK (UN Habitat, 2011).
On the contrary, according to Farha's (2018) report on Homelessness and Human Rights, the
Special Rapporteur for Adequate Housing at the United Nations stated that about 900 million
people live in informal settlements, lacking tenure security, and entire communities have
developed in conditions akin to slums. The governments and profit-driven developers
frequently demolish these communities without giving any prior notice or offering to replace
the lost homes. Housing is now perceived as a means of accumulating wealth and assets
rather than as a social purpose, according to Farha (2018). Taken away from its sense of
belonging, dignity, and community, it has turned into a financial commodity.
This indicates that while private developers and investors are acquiring land and homes to
amass wealth, they are ignoring the social need for housing. To a certain extent, this results in
problems like unaffordable housing, sub-serviced housing, and degraded areas that have an
impact on people all over the world.
It has come to light that Australia's housing system requires radical overhaul. Approximately
3,000 social and affordable homes were being built annually prior to the COVID-19
pandemic, compared to an estimated need of 36,000 homes (727,000 by 2036) (Lawson,
Pawson et al. 2018). A multi-sectoral response is necessary given the scope of the need.
However, the basic costs of building and maintaining rental housing are not covered by the
revenue it brings in, even though the number of managed homes in the not-for-profit
community housing sector more than doubled from 39,800 to 82,900 between 2008–09 and
2016–17 (Milligan, Pawson et al. 2017). Consequently, private developers were brought in to
help with the delivery of social housing in order to keep up with the rising demand.
From the time of colonization, Botswana's government has been in charge of acquiring,
maintaining, allocating, and managing land for urban development. After independence, the
Ministry of Local Government and Lands—later known as the Ministry of Local
Government, Lands and Housing—took over this duty, which had been under the Public
Works Department (PWD) during the colonial era. The main piece of law controlling land
delivery and servicing in communities designated as "planning areas" is the Town and
Country Planning Act (TCPA) of 1977, which underwent significant amendments in 2013.
The Act further stipulated that land must be developed in both urban and rural settlements in
an orderly and progressive manner, that amenities must be preserved and improved, that land
development permits must be granted, and that land use must be closely monitored. The
Minister of Local Government and Lands in Botswana was primarily responsible for the
aforementioned activities. The construction industry made the decision to involve the private
sector in development projects to help curb the rising demand for social housing with well-
serviced housing communities.
Lombard (1996) pointed out that the growth of informal settlements surrounding developing
countries' cities and urban migration in the 1950s and 1960s typically drew negative reactions
from governments; as a result, private developers are being hired to help meet the rising
demand. By the 1960s, South Africa had public housing programmes in place as a result of
political pressure on governments to step in and help the poor by intervening in the housing
market and worries about planned urban expansion (Lombard, 1996).
According to Harvey (2005), housing policies in the majority of African nations started out as
a deliberate disregard for housing issues and developed into slum clearance without
consideration for the social repercussions. One such example of this is Zimbabwe's Operation
Murambatsvina in 2005. Tibaijuka (2005) claims that Operation Murambatsvina was
intended to end illegal housing, which had an immediate impact on many urban poor people.
The ability of the government to supply this fundamental need is the main issue that cities in
Zimbabwe face when it comes to housing demand and private developers are also involved
and are expanding their influence on the provision of social housing. The majority of
researchers, however, have taken issue with the way governments, particularly those in
developing countries, have approached the housing problem, citing Zimbabwe as a case in
point (Moyo, 2014; Ngwenya, 2017; Mutembedzi, 2012; Masimba, 2016).
The Zimbabwean government has implemented various housing policies since independence,
including the national housing fund, site and service policies, majority home ownership,
building brigades, housing cooperatives, and waiting list creation (Chaeruka, 2009; Vakil,
1995, 1996; Auret, 1995; Tibaijuka, 2005). According to Tibaijuka (2005), the National
Housing Delivery Policy (NHDP) of 2000 acknowledges "serious shortfalls in housing
delivery and a cumulative backlog of over one million housing units."
Housing should be planned for and provided in due time with all its services like sewer, water
reticulation and roads being incorporated into it (Moyo, 2014). The engagement of private
developers to help meet an increased demand for social housing needs to be taken into
consideration. As a result, local authorities are currently faced with growing responsibilities
and tasks, which include planning and land management, development control, and an
increase in service demand (Masimba, 2016).
Despite the growing demand for affordable housing and the critical need for social housing
provision, there is a lack of comprehensive research that examines the potential challenges
and considerations associated with private developer involvement, which is crucial for
ensuring successful and equitable social housing outcomes (Mosha, 2003). Therefore, there is
a need for a systematic and in-depth analysis that assesses the impacts, benefits, challenges,
and considerations of private developer engagement in social housing delivery. If this
challenge is not assessed and rectified, there may be increased delivery of poor social
housing, an increase of slums and informal settlements.
The research aims to examine the motivations, incentives, drawbacks, and challenges
associated with private developers' participation, while also evaluating how their involvement
influences the quantity and quality of social housing units.
1.4.2 Objectives
i. To examine the impact of private developers' involvement on the quantity and quality of
social housing units produced in Harare city.
ii. To assess the motivations and incentives driving private developers to engage in social
housing delivery.
iii. To document the challenges being faced by private developers in social housing delivery
in Harare.
iv. To proffer possible solutions that can be implemented in sustainable social housing
through the engagement of private developers.
i. What are the impacts of private developers’ involvement in social housing delivery?
ii. What are the motivations and incentives driving private developers in social housing
delivery?
iii. What are the challenges being faced by private developers in social housing delivery?
iv. What are the possible solutions that can be implemented to deliver sustainable social
housing through the engagement of private developers?
1.6 Justification
The research seeks to unearth the various ways cities can incorporate to achieve efficient and
sustainable social housing through the engagement of private developers. While Farha
(2018), speaks of the issue of affordability which is fueled by profit-driven developers and
investors who have neglected the social need of housing. Maahan (2006) and Cloete (2005)
point out other factors including availability and access to land as well as security of tenure as
the causes of inadequate and unsustainable social housing worldwide.
a) Social housing refers to housing units that are specifically designated for individuals or
families with low incomes or other housing (Mutembedzi 2012).
b) Private developers refers to Commercial entities that engage in the development, sale or
rental of social housing properties (Santana et al, 2021) These can be individuals, companies
or organizations who undertake development as part of their business operations. Some
examples of private developers include, real estate developers, construction companies and
infrastructure developers.
c) Housing quality refers to the physical condition, amenities, and standards of a housing
unit. It encompasses factors such as the structural integrity, safety, liveability, and
functionality of the dwelling, including aspects such as space, ventilation, heating, plumbing,
and overall building maintenance (Rhodes, J. 2012).
d) Policy frameworks refers to the set of principles, guidelines, regulations, and strategies
established by government authorities to guide decision-making and actions related to a
specific area, in this case, social housing (Desmond, M. 2016)
e) Affordable housing usually refers to as Housing that can be bought, or rented, by a low to
moderate-income household, at a cost of maximum 30% of their income (Henry, 2020)
.f) Local authorities, which include cities, towns, municipalities, counties, and boards, are
the official administrative organisations in charge of all public services within designated
geographic areas. Through the use of monies generated from local communities, loans and
grants from the federal government, and other sources, local authorities are responsible with
assuring the provision and upkeep of public services to local citizens (Zimbabwe Institute,
2005).
Chapter 1: Gives a brief overview of the study's history and context. It also contains
geographical maps of the study area. The issue statement, research questions, goals, and
objectives are then followed by a justification for the investigation.
Chapter 2: Reviews the literature behind the factors which pose an asessment on the impacts
of private developer’s engagement in social housing delivery in Zimbabwe.
Chapter 3: It will discuss the research methodology constructed for the purposes of this
research. It will also explore the requirements and limitations of each of the methods used.
Chapter 4: The chapter entails data collection using various methods and tools discussed in
Chapter 3 and it seeks to present and analyse the findings of the research.
Chapter 5: This chapter will conclude the research by providing a summary of the research
findings and the limitations faced. Recommendations for future research will also be outlined
in this section.
Chapter Conclusion
To sum up, this chapter has provided an overview of social housing delivery, including
background information on a global, regional, and local level—specifically, Zimbabwe and
Harare. The research gap, the goal of the study, which leads to an outline of the aim and
objectives of the research, the research questions on the study, and a justification of the study
were also outlined in this chapter. An explanation of essential terminology was provided, and
the chapter also clarified an area of study and included a map of the region of study. This
chapter included the chapter outline as well.
CHAPTER 2: Literature Review
2.1 Introduction
According to Fink (2004), a literature review is an assessment of data from the literature that
is pertinent to the research being done. The aim of this is to present current understanding of
the topic while pointing out gaps and suggesting ways to make the knowledge base stronger.
According to Thompson Rivers University (2013), a literature review can stimulate future
research into an area that was previously unexplored or understudied by providing familiarity
with current ideas and research on a given topic. A literature review serves several purposes
for a researcher: it gives the research context, justifies its necessity, ensures that similar
research hasn't been done before, allows the researcher to draw lessons from earlier theories
on the topic, and identifies weaknesses in the previous research (Calabrese, 2006)
This chapter reviewed the most recent and pertinent data regarding the provision of social
housing through the involvement of private developers in this housing delivery. The
assessment covers the effects of private developers' involvement in the provision of social
housing, the difficulties faced by residents of privately developed areas and potential
solutions to these issues, as well as an analysis of the incentives and motivations behind
private developers' involvement in the provision of social housing and a guide on potential
solutions that could be put into practice to ensure the delivery of social housing in a
sustainable [Link] literature that is used consists of books, journals, the internet, and
other pertinent materials. Based on recognised schools of thought, the literature serves as the
foundation for discussion and recommendations.
Therefore, a literature review is the selection of relevant published and unpublished works
that address a given topic and offer insights into its nature, methods of investigation, and
other aspects. It also assesses these works in light of the study and provides information,
ideas, data, and evidence written from a particular viewpoint to achieve specific goals.
2.2 Conceptual Framework
Fig 2.2.1
The policy framework provides the guidelines and mechanisms for public-private
collaborations in social housing delivery. It may include provisions for public-private
partnerships (PPPs), mixed-income developments, or inclusionary zoning (Haffner et al.,
2016). Such frameworks aim to balance private sector interests to provide affordable
housing to low-income populations (Gilbert & Varady, 2017).
Private developers bring their expertise, resources, and market knowledge to the delivery
of social housing. They contribute to the construction, financing, and management of
housing projects (Malpass & Murie, 2019). Private developers' involvement can help
address the shortage of affordable housing units and accelerate the pace of housing
production (Wachter & Cho, 2017).
v. Private Sector
The implementation phase involves the actual development and construction of social
housing projects by private developers. This phase includes activities such as site
selection, design, construction, and project management (Davies et al., 2015). Private
developers' expertise and experience in the housing market can help ensure the successful
execution of projects (Malpass & Murie, 2019).
Government policies play a crucial role in shaping the involvement of private developers
in social housing delivery. These policies may include legislation, regulations, and
incentives that encourage private sector participation (Van Dijk, 2018). For example, tax
breaks, subsidies, or density bonuses can incentivize private developers to include
affordable housing units in their projects (Ong, 2018).
The ultimate outcome of involving private developers in social housing delivery is the
creation of affordable housing units. These units are made available to low-income and
vulnerable populations, addressing the critical need for affordable housing (Reed et al.,
2015). The involvement of private developers can help increase the overall supply of
social housing units and reduce waiting lists (Van Dijk, 2018).
Conclusively, increased housing units is the outcome expected of the concept of the
engagement of private developers in the provision of social housing in Harare town.
2.3 Theoretical Framework
In 1955, Rossi introduced the notion of "housing needs" as a theoretical construct to explain
the connection between residential happiness and dissatisfaction. According to Rossi's theory,
as a household moves through different stages of life, there is frequently a mismatch between
the circumstances of their housing and the neighborhood, which results in shifting housing
needs and goals. Families have changing housing needs and preferences as they move
through different stages of the life cycle. This notion is consistent with Maslow's hierarchy of
needs, which postulates that there may be differences in a family's needs, housing
circumstances, and neighborhood conditions (Abraham Maslow, 1943).
The idea that families may express dissatisfaction with their current living situation is also
emphasized by the theory of housing needs. Depending on how the life cycle changes, the
element of need may change. This suggests that residences might not fully satisfy the
standards and expectations of social housing for their occupancy. According to Abraham
Maslow (1943), Maslow's hierarchy of needs prioritizes basic needs like safety, esteem,
belongingness, and self-actualization, highlighting their significance in meeting basic needs,
empowering individuals to realize their full potential, and facilitating their integration into a
society that provides fair social amenities. Families may consequently experience social
issues and environmental difficulties like potholes and gullies as a result of these unmet
needs.
Variations in the life cycle can result in different space needs, which is thought to be an
important aspect of housing needs. This means that a household is likely to feel unsatisfied
and present several challenges if their current housing and neighborhood do not meet their
residential needs and goals hence further measures of mitigating social housing challenges
need to be taken into consideration (Rossi, 1955).
According to Janice Perlman (1976), an additional idea that pertains to social housing is the
Housing Deficit Theory. Concerning the dynamics of supply and demand in the social
housing industry, this theory primarily addresses the idea of a housing deficit or shortage.
Within the social housing context, the Housing Deficit Theory posits that the demand from
low-income individuals and families with specific needs is greater than the supply of suitable,
affordable housing.
The deficit is the result of multiple factors, including population growth, the restricted
construction of affordable housing, insufficient funding from the government, and
socioeconomic disparities. The theory focuses on how people living in social housing are
affected by this shortage of housing. It acknowledges the difficulties that low-income people
and families may have in finding appropriate housing, which can result in overcrowding,
poor living conditions, and homelessness. According to the theory, this deficiency hurts
people's general quality of life, social integration, and well-being.
Furthermore, when private developers are involved in the delivery of social housing in many
states as a tactic to reduce the deficit, the Housing Deficit Theory highlights the importance
of social housing policies and interventions in addressing the deficit. It implies that policies
aimed at improving housing affordability, expanding the supply of affordable housing units,
and guaranteeing that social housing satisfies the wide range of demands of its occupants
must be put into place by governments and housing authorities. This theory also recognizes
the significance of addressing the housing deficit from a holistic perspective. The statement
underscores the necessity of not only building new, affordable housing units to address the
deficit but also maintaining and restoring the current stock of social housing (Janice Perlman,
1976).
To sum up, it emphasizes how important supportive services are to boosting the success of
social housing projects, including social assistance, counseling, and job training. The
Housing Deficit Theory emphasizes the lack of affordable and suitable housing, which causes
shortages and related difficulties for low-income individuals and families. This is especially
relevant when discussing social housing. It emphasizes how crucial comprehensive strategies
and policy changes are to addressing the deficit, enhancing housing quality, and encouraging
social inclusion for social housing occupants.
In order to address the underlying socioeconomic disparities and advance fairness in the
distribution of housing resources, social justice theory is a significant framework in the field
of social housing, according to John Rawls (1971). As a fundamental human right and a
significant factor in determining social well-being, this theory acknowledges that access to
safe, cheap, and suitable housing is important. Essentially, social justice theory promotes an
egalitarian approach to social housing, in which all individuals have equal possibilities to
obtain and benefit from housing, irrespective of their history, income, or social standing.
In addition, the Social Justice Theory emphasizes how crucial inexpensive housing is for
promoting social inclusion and reducing poverty. Private developers, who prioritize profit
over social housing values, can help achieve this goal. According to Rawls (1971), the
acknowledgment is made that reasonably priced and secure housing can offer people and
families a strong basis to pursue jobs, education, and other prospects, eventually ending the
poverty cycle.
Participation and community engagement are important aspects of social housing efforts,
according to social justice theory. It acknowledges the need for inclusive decision-making
processes that incorporate locals' voices and viewpoints. This minimizes complaints and risks
associated with private developer involvement in the delivery of social housing by ensuring
that social housing policies and programs are responsive to the unique needs and aspirations
of those they are intended to serve, particularly in privately developed areas (Rawls (1971).
Furthermore, social justice theory demands that amenities and support services be included
in social housing developments. In certain areas of Harare, the delivery of social housing by
private developers has made it impossible to sustainably achieve one of the fundamentals of
social mobility—access to healthcare, education, transportation, and other essential services
—for the well-being of the populace and their prospects for upward social mobility (Rawls,
1971).
Finally, community development theory and social sustainability shed light on the social
effects of private developer participation in social housing. Social sustainability theories
highlight how crucial it is for housing interventions to advance social justice, inclusiveness,
and community well-being (Davoudi et al., 2013). The theory emphasizes the significance of
taking into account the long-term social benefits, community involvement, and social
cohesion of private developer involvement in social housing projects.
This section reviews the methodologies and approaches used to assess the impacts of private
developer engagement in social housing projects. Various evaluation frameworks, indicators,
and performance measures have been developed to assess the economic, governance, and
social impacts of such engagements (Smithson et al., 2019). Common assessment criteria
include affordability, quality, sustainability, community participation, and social cohesion
(UN-Habitat, 2016). The literature suggests the importance of using a multidimensional
approach that considers both quantitative and qualitative data to capture the diverse impacts
of private developer involvement.
It is well acknowledged that problems with land and housing are closely related, to the point
that obtaining property is a necessary requirement for beginning any kind of housing process
(Lombard, 1996). According to Mutembedzi (2012), there is such a severe land scarcity in
Zimbabwe's urban regions that, over the past 10 years, both the national government and
local authorities have mostly built infill stands as a kind of housing. According to Mjanga
(2016), Queen Victoria signed the Royal Charter in 1889, which is when Zimbabwe's land
issue began. Mutembedzi (2012) adds that as property surrounding metropolitan regions has
not been made available since 1997, private developers are finding it challenging to fill the
void that is needed to be filled in the social housing delivery.
The availability of appropriate land is a main concern for the developers, as much of it within
the confines of Harare has been utilized thus forcing the city to sprawl further out into areas
like Mount Hampden, Ushehwekunze, Southlea Park as is the shortage of land for social
housing development in Harare town.
Land-related concerns are typically political in character, with strong emotional ties to the
past. In the instance of South Africa, these stem from the eighteenth-century land rights
conflict between white settlers and black tribes (Lombard, 1996). With their better weapons,
individualistic beliefs, and creation of a land market, the white people typically benefited at
the expense of the black people.
Masimba (2016) claims that housing cooperatives, which are associated with political parties
and exist to advance political goals, have encroached upon property designated for private
developers' future development. All of this is done in the name of empowerment through land
allocations for social housing, but later on, when no services are provided or maintained by
accountable authorities, the informal settlements took over and became the focus of criticism,
with the private sector being held accountable for housing while some private developers
struggle to secure the necessary land for development. Makunde (2016) further argued that
the main barrier to the sufficient supply of affordable urban housing in emerging nations is
land scarcity and high cost.
Furthermore, Mutembedzi (2012) notes that because of its high cost, land intended for low-
income housing has instead been distributed to middle-class and upper-class groups that can
pay the property costs. By contrast, Lombard (1996) contends that political, social, and
institutional limitations rather than a complete lack of essential resources are often the cause
of land and housing supply constraints. As a result, private developers may encounter
challenges in creating social housing that is within the means of the lower-class population.
Regarding the land scarcity issue, Mjanga (2016) stated that recommendations are being
made to local authorities via the National Housing Policy to take into account building high-
rise apartments that don't require large amounts of land. When compared to high-rise
buildings, the typical low-rise buildings found in most cities take up a lot of area (Ngwenya,
2017). Within the framework of the National Housing Delivery Programme (2014–2018), the
government has mandated that twenty percent of the land designated for housing
development be set aside specifically for apartment block.
Rather, Moyo (2014) refutes this claim, arguing that the enormous costs of constructing high-
rise structures individually make it impractical to build apartments, which puts an end to the
concept of inexpensive housing options. The majority of property developers find it
challenging to provide social housing since apartments demand a significant financial
investment which is capital intensive hence it needs a lot of money and on completion, the
prices or rentals of those flats are most probably high and eliminating the affordability factor.
Thus, the government, which owns the land surrounding metropolitan areas, can aid in
resolving the housing shortage issue by giving private developers inexpensive property on
which to build affordable homes. There is no more room since the city's outskirts are seeing
an increase in growth (Mutembedzi, 2012).
"Policies to improve housing delivery and order respectively" have been developed by the
national and local governments. In an effort to bring housing policy into line with practice, it
is evident that there are many obstacles and limitations (Mashoko, 2012). According to
Tadesse et al. (2008), the obstacle to providing housing for everyone is the absence of
housing policy that closes the gap between housing development and the demand for housing
brought on by urbanization.
Adherence to a policy helps establish confidence among the populace and state credibility
when interacting with foreign parties like investors. Given that informal settlements are
assumed to arise due to a shortage of housing, housing policy is considered the primary
mechanism for addressing the informal settlement phenomenon (Marx, 2003). Even private
developers are unable to put an end to informal settlements in order to provide high-quality
social housing for the populace because doing so frequently exposes the state to public
criticism when such policies yield little to no results.
According to Chatiza and Mlalazi (2009), there has been significant under-provisioning and
neighborhood decay as proof that post-colonial housing policies implemented forty years
after independence were insufficient. Low-income earners' housing needs have been
marginalized by trends in housing policy since 1980, according to Moyo (2014). A number of
housing-related policies have been implemented, involving private developers, but they
typically yield minimal results. According to Katsande et al. (2014), there are legal and
policy frameworks in place in Zimbabwe for the government to build a stock of affordable
and accessible housing, but the implementation of these frameworks is being hindered by the
tensions surrounding the realization of the rights of urban dwellers.
According to Mushota (1991), earlier policies that were introduced and put into place without
sufficient understanding of the nature and breadth of the housing problems are mostly to
blame for the lessons learned from past failures in housing provisions. Local governments
have implemented these laws in an attempt to permanently alleviate the housing scarcity;
however, as Mutembedzi (2012) argued, they don't deal with the fundamental issue that
prevents low-income people from obtaining decent homes, which is the involvement of
private developers.
The targeting tactics used by the housing sector, according to Masimba (2016), impede the
effective functioning of these programmes because they focus on individuals who have
limited resources and ability to repay housing bills. Governments ought to ensure that the
legal frameworks are optimal for those with low incomes, as stated by Mjanga (2016).
Adopting user-friendly housing ordinances with the intention of housing the urban poor is
necessary if the housing crisis is to be addressed.
According to Moyo (2014), a National Housing Policy Fund was established in 1982 as a
first of such attempts to support home ownership. Moyo (2014) is also of the view that the
government of Zimbabwe propounded that the Housing Guarantee fund and National
Housing fund allowing full participation of building societies serves as a means to finance the
delivery of low-cost housing hence this may enable even the private developers to access
finance and deliver social housing to the residents at low cost and with improved services.
However, due to annual budgetary allocations that fell short of private developers' demands
for the supply of social housing, the government was compelled to borrow money from
abroad and was unable to support itself. Mutekede (2007) highlights that the primary issue
with internal financing for affordable housing is the scarcity of internal revenue streams,
which leads to a reliance on central government loans for project implementation.
In the social housing delivery industry, private developers have access to borrowing as an
additional revenue stream, as noted by Chilunjika and Zhou (2013). Nevertheless, the World
Bank (WB) and International Monetary Fund (IMF) withdrawal in the late 1990s hindered
local authorities' ability to develop and maintain both on- and off-site infrastructure, which
meant that private developers could not borrow the necessary funds to build social housing.
This was noted in the National Report for Habitat III (2015), which stated that "there has not
been any meaningful foreign direct investment in housing development ever since the
withdrawal of the same."
Furthermore, private developers in the social housing delivery sector also had the option of
borrowing money for the creation of social housing. Unfortunately, this option was unfeasible
due to the nation's ongoing hyperinflation and economic recession, which began in 2017 with
the introduction of new local currency in the form of bond coins and notes. This resulted in
high interest rates on funds intended for property development, which discouraged borrowing
for those projects and prevented private developers from increasing the number and quality of
social housing units (Chita, 2014). According to Dewa et al. (2014), private developers ought
to either outsource or start recapitalizing their revenue-generating ventures.
2.5.4 Affordability
The concept of affordable housing highlights the needs of households whose wages are
insufficient to enable them to purchase good home on the market without assistance,
according to Milligan et al. (2009). "Affordability, or the ability of low-income workers to
purchase affordable housing—including mortgage packages provided by financial institutions
—is therefore a key concern in the provision of affordable housing. According to
Mutembedzi (2012), the problem of housing affordability has been exacerbated by declining
real income, poor financial planning by the government, skyrocketing inflation, and a rise in
unemployment since independence. According to Farha (2018), property speculators now
view housing as a means of accumulating wealth and assets, and it no longer serves a social
purpose. Its link to community, dignity, and the concept of home have been taken away, and
it is now only valued financially.
The ability of particular groups of people to rent or purchase adequate home at a cheap cost
while also enabling them to meet other basic necessities on a sustained basis is referred to as
affordable housing (Betsetswe, 2014, as quoted by Mjanga, 2016). When the private
developer finishes building social housing for rental purposes, for example, will prospective
tenants be able to pay the appropriate rental amounts? Since properties are not easily
convertible to liquid, private developers might be discouraged from creating more communal
housing to rent or sell.
The urban poor, low-income workers, and private developers all struggle with housing
affordability since these groups are unable to provide enough affordable homes for the
growing population for a variety of reasons (Ngwenya, 2017). Mutembedzi (2012) notes that
low-income populations are being shut out of the housing land markets due to the high
demand for land and its scarcity, which has led to price hikes on the best property. Low-
income individuals have been overlooked by rising housing costs because private developers
must also pay for the expensive cost of land.
According to Mutekede(2007), most urban dwellers cannot afford adequate housing without
aid, and these private developers are unable to meet the costs of providing decent housing on
their own. While some housing help is supplied through government housing incentives,
Masimba (2016) concurs with Mutekede (2007) that the process for obtaining these
incentives is still mainly unstructured.
However, Butcher (1986) noted that people are forced to rent or set up squatter camps due to
the low cost of residential stands. As private developers in Harare have failed to offer
affordable accommodation for the city's residents, it should be highlighted that the urban poor
have been forced into squatter camps, such those seen in Mbare, Matapi (Ngwenya, 2017).
Problems with squatter settlements include the rapid spread of diseases and the
encouragement of immoral behaviour such as prostitution and criminality.
The Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (2011) states that significant macroeconomic instability
struck Zimbabwe between 2000 and 2008, which resulted in a drop in the provision of
services by private developers. According to Chita (2014), municipal councils in Zimbabwe
faced a number of difficulties starting in the year 2000, including hyperinflation, a declining
national economy, a lack of foreign exchange, and high borrowing rates.
According to Musekiwa and Chatiza (2015), there was a significant reduction in local income
due to the post-2000 economic instability, which also limited the ability of the central
government and private developers to obtain external financing. Imedi (2016) concurs,
adding that private developers have faced real challenges in collecting their dues from tenants
and other stakeholders regarding lettable buildings and payment arrears during the
hyperinflation period of 2000–2008.
Over the past ten years, the economic climate in Zimbabwe and other nations in the region
has not been good for the construction of homes and other infrastructure. (Zimbabwe
economic monthly review, 2014). The current economic climate is making it difficult for
local authorities to provide affordable housing. Due to these difficulties, a number of housing
developments have received funding from private initiatives, which has led to their charging
astronomical prices (Moyo, 2014).
Also, equity considerations should be taken into consideration in the sense that it would be
valuable to explore the potential equity implications of involving private developers in social
housing projects. This could involve investigating whether the involvement of private
developers disproportionately benefits certain income groups or exacerbates existing
inequalities in access to affordable housing. Further research could explore the extent to
which community engagement and participation are integrated into the process of engaging
private developers in social housing delivery. Understanding the role of community input in
decision-making, design, and ongoing management of social housing projects can help ensure
that the needs and preferences of residents are adequately addressed (Willis, K. et. al, 2017).
Furthermore, there may be a need for more comprehensive evaluations of the outcomes and
impacts of engaging private developers in social housing delivery (Carswell, A. T. et .al,
2012) . This could involve assessing factors such as the quality of housing, social cohesion,
neighbourhood revitalization, and the overall effectiveness of public-private partnerships in
achieving affordable housing goals.
The methods and procedures that will be used to carry out this research in order to meet the
predetermined goals are presented in this chapter. The utilization of primary and secondary
data collection tools will yield authoritative information regarding rising difficulties related to
housing delivery in the modern world. Research tools that will be deemed suitable for
determining the status quo include surveys, interviews, and document analysis. The
justification for using each of the data collection tools mentioned above will be provided in
order to demonstrate their validity.
This chapter also describes the methodology, sample strategies, research design, and research
procedures that will be applied to this study. The researcher also provides justification for the
instruments and techniques listed above, which will be employed in the data collection
process. The final section of the chapter will concentrate on data gathering tools, data
collection process, ethical issues, data analysis, and chapter summary.
Since quantitative research often uses facts or statistics, it is usual to have an objectivist
perspective of the objects under study and a positivist or natural science paradigm.
Quantitative information on the challenges impacting the delivery of social housing can be
obtained by measuring the number of units produced above predefined parameters, such as
the number of stands or homes delivered in response to a given demand.
Methodological triangulation and mixed-method approach which entails using many options
to obtain data, such as observations, questionnaires, documents, and interviews, is what the
researcher will employ for the study. By using many techniques for gathering and analyzing
data, a situation's acquired picture can be strengthened and verified through triangulation
(Greener, 2008). Furthermore, it offers a validation of results obtained using a specific
technique. After analyzing the data, Abdullah (2013) came to the conclusion that integrating
various approaches would help explain the phenomenon better because it could uncover
details that a single methodological technique would miss.
3.5 Population
3.5 .1 Target Population
All individuals who satisfy the specific criteria listed for a research study are referred to as
the target population (Alvi, 2016). We hope that this population will benefit from the findings
of our research. The study's target population ought to be pertinent. For more accurate
outcomes, they ought to be knowledgeable about the relevant field and the issue at hand. Key
informants included a range of departments within the social housing delivery sector, such as
the Department of Engineering, Town Planning, Housing and Community Services, Private
Developers, Health Services, Estates Departments, and Financial Services.
In order to educate readers on the topic and highlight the social housing delivery experiences
in the city of Harare, Harare City was selected. Through insights into local government
structures, the Harare case aids in the development of a distinctive perspective and a more
thorough study of the issues surrounding the delivery of social housing and the elements that
contribute to these issues.
a. Purposive Sampling
According to Kumar (2011), intentional sampling is a sampling strategy where the researcher
chooses participants only on the basis of who they believe is most likely to have the
information they need and be willing to provide it with them. Purposeful sampling is a
commonly used technique in qualitative research, particularly in case studies or grounded
theory, where samples and populations are very small (Greener, 2008). Choosing a sample
based on the researcher's personal knowledge of the population, its constituents, and the
nature of the study aims is referred to as "purposeful sampling" (Babbie, 1997).
In order to guarantee that the samples are relevant to the research questions being posed, the
study benefits from intentional sampling, which makes participant selection possible
(Bryman, 2012). "The only people included in the study's sample will be those who can shed
light on the challenges posed by the engagement of commercial developers in the provision
of social housing. Purposeful sampling is a need-based criterion in a programme where the
components chosen fulfil a particular requirement. The researcher for the study will profit
from this sampling approach since it will save time in figuring out who is qualified to be
included in the sample (Laher and Botha, 2012).
Purposeful sampling will be used in particular to get data from the beneficiaries, who are
knowledgeable about housing-related issues. Purposeful sampling might function effectively
in this study because it costs less money and takes less time. The investigator will therefore
be able to finish the investigation by the deadline. In addition, this sampling approach has the
advantage of keeping irrelevant or superfluous random elements from inadvertently entering
the sample (Henning!).
Anorld (1970) pointed out certain drawbacks of purposeful sampling that should be avoided
in this study. Bias or prejudice have ample room to exist, particularly if the researcher has
any influence over the population selection.
b. Convenience Sampling
Another technique the researcher employed to connect with each respondent individually was
convenience sampling. However, in order to prevent bias and obtain information from a
single source, the researcher sampled several remote locations in order to obtain diverse data.
This is the data obtained by means of a survey methodology that proposes likely causes for
particular relationships between variables. It is important because it gives the researcher more
control over the research process and because, with sampling, it is possible to get findings
that are representative of obtaining data for the entire population at a lesser expense than
doing so. Use was made of reports on preventive measures. These origins were also explained
by Basera et al. (2019).
Interviews can be divided into two categories: structured and unstructured. The research will
employ unstructured interviews due to their adaptability (Mentz, 2012). It will also be
advantageous since interview questions can be changed to fit the context and interviewees
(Kawulich and Holland, 2012). It is possible to get information informally and sometimes the
subjects won't even realize they are being questioned. According to Kawulich and Holland
(2012), the researcher would be free to pursue unanticipated leads and steer interviews in
more productive directions in the collection of data for social housing in Harare
b. Questionnaires
To gather pertinent data, semi-structured questionnaires will be utilized to elicit descriptive
answers from the interviewers, and open-ended questions will be employed to prompt the
interviewees which is appendix 3,4,5 and 6 to elaborate on certain topics. The researcher will
use the questionnaire technique since it encourages respondents to provide thoughtful,
independent answers which is appendix 1 and appendix 2. Hatcliffe residents may be able to
answer more effectively if given the freedom to complete the self-administered questionnaire
on their own schedule, and the decision to employ one will be founded on the knowledge that
such a questionnaire is helpful in situations where it is not feasible to monitor directly.
According to Morse et. al, 2015, the determination of a sample size for a qualitative data
research varies depending on the participants' availability and level of research expertise
(Barkhuizen, 2018) have influenced the choice of how many participants to include in the
qualitative research. As a result, the research indicates that there are no clear guidelines for
determining participant numbers. For instance, the experts listed above provided varying
viewpoints on how to choose the sample for a qualitative study. Therefore, the selection of a
small sample size was recommended since it has the outlined number of advantages that it
carries in qualitative research. One of the advantages of considering small sample sizes was
mentioned by Francis, Hong & Cross, 2020, p. 6, he said a small sample size enables the
researcher to provide a thorough explanation, which is difficult with bigger samples. Hence,
the researcher of this project is going to take a sample size of just thirty-three residents from
Hatcliffe extension residents to whom she is going to distribute questionnaires.
.
c. Observations
The qualitative method in this field of study will include the utilization of observations (see
appendix 7). Smith and Dell (2009) define observations as first-hand observation or tracking
of events connected to a research field. The researcher typically conducts observations
without asking the target community for information. They are typically carried out to get
specific data on the research area. Abdullah (2013) asserts that observations enable the
researcher to obtain firsthand knowledge that could be highly helpful in elucidating the
situation on the ground.
Secondary data to be captured includes literature brought forward by other scholars on the
issue of social housing delivery in Zimbabwe and the world. Secondary data will be analyzed
in an attempt to understand the nature of the problem and how it has grown over the years.
Hence secondary data on challenges in social housing delivery will be pointing out how
solutions brought forward by scholars on the matter have failed to be implemented by the
engagement of private developers.
In order to employ secondary data in the context of the research project, it will be examined
and analysed. An assessment of the data and its source is required prior to utilising secondary
data. The temporal range of the secondary data, source bias, measurement error, reliability,
and the terminology employed should all receive special consideration.
To respect people's rights to privacy, safety, confidentiality, and protection from dishonesty
while pursuing scientific endeavors, ethical concerns are essential (Polit and Hungler, 1998).
According to Neuman (2011), doing ethical research necessitates striking a balance between
the importance of expanding knowledge and the importance of not meddling in other people's
lives. Thus, research mustn't injure the subjects of the study (Anorld, 1970).
The study makes sure that taking part in the research won't hurt participants in any manner. If
someone feels humiliated when their identity is revealed, they could suffer consequences.
Once it is disclosed to the participant that they will be a part of the study, there may be an
emotional injury that could damage their reputation (Kawulich and Holland, 2012).
Anonymity denotes that the participants' identities are unknown to the researcher (Bryman,
2008). According to Bryman (2008), confidentiality is the knowledge of the participants'
identities by the researcher but their refusal to share them.
Data entering, data cleaning, and coding will make up the data processing. Attempting to
compile information into a form that is manageable and creating a story around it is the idea.
While the researcher attempts to assess trends rather than examine every single piece of data,
some numerical data will be displayed. Therefore, data displays will be used to assess the
data obtained from the investigation. Frequencies, percentages, and means will be used in the
analysis and interpretation of data. To facilitate straightforward comparison and situational
projection, the data will be displayed using tables, graphs, and charts (Shenton, 2004).
By examining each question in turn and identifying recurring themes, patterns, and
connections, the data will be analysed (Shenton, 2004). Following a thorough analysis of the
collected data in relation to the predetermined goals, the relevant conclusions will be drawn.
A thorough examination of these findings will be provided in chapter four.
The study methodology, design, and tools employed were covered in this chapter. The study
was focused on the city of Harare and used questionnaires and interviews to collect data. For
the study, a sample of the population that is reasonably representative of the whole will be
chosen. Purposive and convenience sampling techniques will be used to choose sample
members of the population for the research. Given the careful management of the population
and sample, a high response rate is possible. Data validation was further aided by the use of
triangulation of instruments.
.
CHAPTER FOUR: DATA PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND
DISCUSSION
4.0 Introduction
The research on the evaluation of private developers' engagement in the provision of social
housing in Harare, with a particular focus on the Hatcliffe neighbourhood, is presented in the
chapter that follows. The gathered data was evaluated, scrutinised, and interpreted in
accordance with the goals and study questions to facilitate easy conceptualization. The data
was presented using tables, pie charts, and bar graphs to help with comprehension. As
demonstrated in the chapter before, the targeted groups were surveyed and interviewed in
order to obtain the necessary information.
The study is guided by a set of objectives that include documenting the difficulties faced by
private developers in the delivery of social housing and offering potential solutions that could
be implemented in sustainable social housing through the involvement of private developers.
Examining the impact of private developers' involvement on the quantity and quality of social
housing units produced in Harare city, evaluating the incentives and motivations driving
private developers to engage in social housing delivery.
The study was carried out in Hatcliffe in Harare city. Questionnaires were administered to the
residents of Hatcliffe as a whole and interviews were conducted with the targeted key
informants.
5
Number of People
0
Gender
Male Female
The majority of respondents are males who dominate most of the higher offices at Harare
City Council. A few women are found in middle level and senior levels hence the low
response participation in this research. Most women at Harare city council play secretarial
positions reporting to middle and senior management which disqualifies them from being
suitable respondents as they will refer you to give questionnaires to or to interview their
supervisors instead of them. The City council has a majority of workers within the age group
of (31 to 50) years, which comprises the middle and supervisory levels. 51 years and above
are considered as seniors who by virtue of age and experience are on the senior level of
management. All of the sampled respondents (100%) acknowledge the importance of social
housing.
4.1.2: Age Range for Residents
25
20
number of people
15
10
0
Gender
Male Female
Table 4.3 shows that the age group in need of housing is between 41-50 years which
represents 48.48% of the total respondents. A critical analysis of this age group indicates that
these are the people with the responsibility of taking care of families as breadwinners. Most
of the people in this category will have finished school and exploring various livelihood
strategies. However, it is also important to take cognizance of the fact that some people who
applied for housing while they were between the ages of 18 to 29 might be still on the waiting
list hence a rise in the 41-50 range.
25%
landlords
tenants
75%
Landlords make up 75% of the selected residents that completed questionnaires. Most of the
Landlords in Hatcliffe are by virtue of being a squatter settler in that state land before it was
acquired by private developers to develop the area for social housing. A quarter of the
population under study consists of tenants with leasehold ownership; some are on the waiting
list, some are unaware or careless about its existence, and some are aware but eager to
purchase real estate from recently developed neighbourhoods by other different private
developers, such as Raihnam Park, which is located along Kikman Road.
When pressed to explain their exclusion from the waiting list, they claim they were unaware
of it and that the housing waiting list is unproductive, with dishonest techniques often used in
the stand distribution process. That being said, the length of time someone has been on the
housing waiting list—which ranges from five to ten years—confirms this. It seems like a long
time to wait for a place to live. When asked about the public housing service provided by
stands or housing spaces in recent years, the majority of respondents gave the endeavour a
low rating compared to what they had anticipated.
As a result of the Harare City Council's progressive decline in service delivery, the public has
lost hope in ever receiving a house from the government because the procedure is now
bureaucratic. This has led to the problem of fake developers who prey on those in need of
housing and the continued poor quality of social housing delivery.
occupation status
16
14
12
number of people
10
0
Govenment Private sector unemployed other
classes of occupations
occupation status
Since communal housing was enforced for former illegal settlers in Hatcliffe during the 2005
operation Murambatsvina, the bulk of the population has been unemployed. The social
housing policy allowed the acquisition of land for this purpose by private developers. Based
on the bar graph, it is evident that the households in Hatcliffe Subdivision have a diverse
range of jobs, but the non-working class, which were represented by 15 out of the 33
individuals chosen for the sample, are the one with the highest concentration. There are
respondents who work for themselves and others who run enterprises in the unofficial
economy.
level of education
20%
80%
There were also inquiries made regarding the supervisors' educational backgrounds in order
to ascertain the ability of local authorities to provide affordable housing. Twenty percent of
the municipal council supervisors own a master's degree, whereas the remaining eighty
percent of the sampled population had an undergraduate degree. Insofar as it provided an
overview of the cognitive abilities of elected and appointed council members in devising
novel ideas for the housing delivery system, the data was relevant. Since most of the staff has
earned undergraduate and graduate degrees to pursue their different fields, the research
determined that the Harare City Council has a highly educated workforce.
Data on educational attainment was relevant since it addressed the issue of knowledge gaps
as presented by Akeju (2007). According to Akeju (2007), the term "knowledge gap" merely
refers to the institutional capability determined by the quality of supervisors. However, if the
nation's socioeconomic standing is to improve, an examination of the data shows that more
educated leadership is required. It is essential to note that a lack of professionalism or
education can also be a barrier to advancement. Akeju (2007) states that most local
authorities are concerned about the knowledge gap since it hinders development.
4.2 Challenges faced by Local Authorities which hinder housing delivery in Harare.
The results showed that HCC faced social housing issues that made it more difficult to
provide housing hence the social housing policy was made flexible to accommodate private
developers in social housing delivery projects. These issues included, but were not limited to,
the collapse of the economy, which led to a brain drain, the inability to buy equipment and
understaff, a lack of funds, unrealistic housing policies, a lack of planning expertise, and a
shortage of land.
availability of land
30%
there is still land
there is no land
70%
For a long time, the issue of land availability has been crucial. Given the sluggish annual rate
at which they are able to obtain stands for public residency, it is apparent that local
authorities in Zimbabwe as a whole either have run out of land or have exhausted it. Though
land does not expand, cities do.
Fig 4.6.2 multiple bar graph showing review points on the master plan of Harare City
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
harare city supervisors private developers Hatcliffe residents government respondents
categories of respondents
So
urce: questionnaires and interviews for social housing issues
Fig 4.6.2, in support of this claim, some respondents with the average of 51% mentioned that
the Harare City Council is supposed to expand its master plan whilst the other 49% are
disagreeing with that due to various reasons which include; land outside the city limits is
owned by another urban local authority or the Rural District Council, and additional land has
been sold to private developers, making master plan adjustments impossible. However, this is
possible in terms of development into public spaces, which is why some private developers
are buying such land and converting it into social housing for Harare residents. For instance,
the Hatcliffe Extension, which was first designated for agricultural use, is now home to
residential areas.
From Fig 4.61 above 30% of the respondents highlighted the fact that land is still available
which is evident given the continued availing of stands to the private developers by Harare
City Council on an annual [Link] is land available. The rising demand for social housing
cannot be met by Harare City Council due to its financial limitations in obtaining more
serviced stands. Harare City Council's ability to partition and build residential stands on land
originally designated for school sites was another argument for why it still possesses more
property.
Local government officials also mentioned the point that land for social housing in Harare is
very scarce therefore they are trying to look for other alternatives to meet the increased
demand for social housing in Harare urban. Fig 4.6.2 shows that 40% of the government
officials were suggesting the expansion of the master plan and the authority said to be given
through the interviews done by the [Link] is due to their statements that they had
permitted the acquisition of nearby farms for residential development, and some of them also
mentioned expanding the municipal boundaries. One respondent went so far as to suggest
accelerating expansion by a 40–50 km radius.
Fig 4.6.2 shows that since private developers are able to service farms to become social
housing space, the 33% of the respondents at city of Harare Housing officials are allowing
them to acquire farms and convert them to residential stands in an attempt to curb the need
for social housing. However, the private developers can only partially service the land and
overprice the stand, which could put a strain on those who are in need of social housing or
cause them to fail to purchase. This research concludes that land is insufficient to meet the
increased demand for social housing in Harare.
20%
there is equipment
there is no equipment
80%
A significant equipment shortage prevented Harare City Council staff from maintaining the
area intended for social development. The lack of sufficient personnel with the necessary
expertise has prevented Harare City Council from providing adequate maintenance for its
residential stands. It was found that a major barrier to the provision of services is the poor
state of equipment in all categories of local administrations. The majority of municipal
administrations, according to Chatiza et al. (2013), lack or malfunction the necessary
equipment. Based on the data shown in Figure 4.7, 80% of the participants disputed that
Harare City Council still has sufficient gear and plant to effectively service stands.
Harare City Council was forced to pre-sell stands to private developers who would waive the
expense of stand maintenance due to the cost of procuring new plant given their financial
difficulties. One of the main issues facing Harare City Council while providing housing for
the general people is the lack of equipment and machinery, as stated by the respondents,
some of whom strongly agreed with this statement. HCC found it difficult to service the
stands internally due to a lack of machinery and equipment. In order to remedy the situation,
Harare City Council has involved the home seekers; however, the home seekers are required
to cover the cost of their stands.
Ranked by Highest Involvement using the mode which is the most appearing score:
70%
60%
rate of involvement
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Private Developers Banks Housing Cooperatives Non-govenmental
Organisation
Stakeholders
Property developers are the primary stakeholder that the Harare City Council has decided to
collaborate with, based on the information shown in Table 4.4 and Figure 4.8. This is because
the majority of real estate developers are foreign contractors, which makes them a source of
foreign investment in a way, and they are essential to the provision of social [Link] to
their ability to purchase land through the pre-sale of virgin land, property developers are able
to service the land at their own expense and subsequently recoup the costs by charging home
seekers for the property, which is why they frequently deliver large quantities of social
housing—even though the units may not be well-serviced.
The decision to work with private developers was made by local authorities since they are
unable to continue providing social housing on their own without assistance from other
parties. As a result, in order to provide affordable housing, local governments had to include
other parties. Banks, cooperative housing, and PPP initiatives are a few of the participants.
The provision of housing has grown to be a massive goal for local governments since they are
unable to effectively provide social housing on their own without the assistance of numerous
partners, most notably private developers. Involving stakeholders ensures that they receive
support in the form of funding, machinery, and increased skill sets.
Table 4.5 showing the motives of stakeholders which are involved in social housing
delivery
Private developers 8 2 10
Banks 4 6 10
Cooperatives 1 9 10
NGOs 2 8 10
Total 15 25 40
The above Table 4.5 illustrates how the involvement of private developers has not succeeded
in addressing the issue of housing affordability, as the majority of these players appear to be
motivated by profit, which accounts for the exorbitant costs of houses.
Working with real estate developers has been perceived as a strict means of isolating low-
income individuals since it is represented by 8 private developers who are profit oriented.
Farha (2018) pointed out that housing is no longer recognised as a social good but rather as a
means of accumulating money and assets. Exorbitant costs are charged by property
developers for their stands, which are only affordable by a select few rather than by those
with modest incomes who are in dire need.
Banks, which are 40% profit-oriented in table 4.5 above, are the second significant partner of
HCC, as indicated by the findings. FBC, CBZ, and Old Mutual are just a few examples of
local banks. HCC collaborates with banks to undertake significant capital projects since
banks pretend to be financiers of development projects. When HCC wishes to embark on
low-cost housing projects, they approach banks for financial assistance.
.
The housing expert noted that the housing cooperatives took action to try to help the residents
obtain social housing in Harare because there was a shortage of suitable social housing. The
well-known mother cooperative, the Zimbabwe National Association of Housing
Cooperatives (ZINAHCO), is a partner of HCC. Housing cooperatives are also partners of
HCC. ZINAHCO's job is to help housing cooperatives register, buy land, and acquire
building supplies. The municipal council gives cooperatives land, and the cooperatives buy
the land, supplies, and construct the homes for their members.
no sufficient funds
30%
70%
Of the respondents of the residents of Hatcliffe, 70% strongly agreed that the lack of funds
hinders Harare City Council's ability to carry out its operations. Additionally, respondents
mentioned that misallocation or misuse of funds within HCC plays a role in the organization's
inability to meet its goals and provide services. Additionally, they think that because of
dishonest tactics, council members employ bribes and backroom deals to choose who gets to
stand ahead of the general people when it comes to stand distribution.
Fig 4.10 showing the number of stands which were issued by private developers in
Hatcliffe
stands which were provided by different developers in
Hatcliffe
1600 1500
1400
1200
Quantity of stands delivered
1000 900
850
800 750
600
400
200
0
DEVELOPER A DEVELOPER B DEVELOPER C DEVELOPER C
Axis Title
Source: Interviews for private developers involved in Hatcliffe social housing delivery
Nearly 4000 residential stands in Hatcliffe were provided by private developers, as seen in
Fig. 4.10 above. According to private developers, they occasionally run into financial
difficulties, which is why they just partially service the land or pre-sell undeveloped virgin
land to prospective homeowners in an effort to raise the money needed for servicing.
However, they might ultimately be unable to offer those seeking housing adequate social
housing for other reasons, such as inflation, improper handling of money that residents pay
for maintenance, and currency fluctuations, all of which would prevent them from providing
residents with adequate social housing.
When it comes to social housing projects, such as land servicing and road networking to
connect with newly developed areas like Hatcliffe, the Harare City Local Authorities in the
Housing Land Servicing Department also mentioned that the Harare municipality was not
allocating enough funds. This is when the housing policies became sufficiently flexible to
allow private developers to be accommodated, even though their primary goal was to make
money on real estate through the sale of partially or unserviced stands and the ongoing
collection of money from homeowners or prospective homeowners under the guise of land
maintenance, which is unfair and puts a pressure on the populace because the majority of
citizens are unemployed, which contributes to the growth in socioeconomic constraints.
4.3 Challenges faced by Hatcliffe residence due to poor and inadequate social housing in
the area.
4.3.1 Overcrowding
The observation states that there is a lack of affordable housing, which has caused people to
live in small spaces and increased the risk of disease epidemics. According to the Zimbabwe
Red Cross Society's 2013 Vulnerability Assessment, Hatcliffe has 11658 dwellings and a
population of around 45,000. A lack of appropriate social housing and residential space
contributed to overcrowding, which in turn encouraged an increase in crime rates, illness
outbreaks, illegal settlements, and in extreme cases, destitution, according to questionnaire
responses and interviews conducted by the Hatcliffe residence.
Fig 4.11 above shows that, most of the newly developed areas in Harare are not yet serviced
and some are partially serviced including areas like Hatcliffe and its peripheries. The roads
are not well-constructed and they are still not yet tarred, there are no working traffic lights, at
night the area is dark as they are no adequate provisions for street lights or tower light, in
some parts there is no proper sewer system they use small septic tanks which can get full
easily and the collection of that waste is said to be expensive for the residence. This has
encouraged a high rate of spreading of waterborne diseases such as cholera. of criminal
activities such as theft.
Through the interview that was done by the researcher to the housing expert, he also pointed
out that the private developers have a habit of leaving the new developed are partially
serviced and once they have sold all of the stands for residential purposes at that area, they
are done with the area and they can freely move to other areas to develop and do the same at
the expense of adequate social housing delivery to the society. The housing expert also
pointed out that the developers are highly charging the home seekers with the justification of
servicing fees whilst they are not servicing the areas as per say, which is unfair to the home
seekers and unethical practice as well.
14
12
number of respondents
10
0
unserviced partially serviced
From Fig.4.9 above shows that almost 66% of the respondents are confirming that the land is
not yet serviced and 38% of the respondents shows that local residents were complaining
saying that the private developers are cheating since they want more money from them
especially after they have paid an amount for a complete stand which should be fully serviced
and the developer will be nowhere to be found and the residence are suffering the
consequences of this poor social housing delivery. On the other hand the private developers
are saying the residents are reluctant to pay for the services fee to be offered to them and they
need to continue receiving money for servicing the land.” ”
There is a potential health hazard in Hatcliffe due to the construction of pit latrine-style
toilets by some households, which is against WHO and Harare City Council health standards
regulations. Some of these toilets are located within a few metres of their nearest water wells,
which may also be uncovered. The Hatcliffe area has documented cases of infectious diseases
like cholera, typhoid, and tuberculosis due to inhumane living circumstances.
Since the suburb's Hatcliffe extension was developed some time ago, the homes that are part
of it do not have running water. As evidence for the aforementioned, this study found that a
considerable portion of Harare's population has suffered from a variety of issues, including
potholed roads, uncollected trash, irregular water supplies, and sewage obstructions.
Harare City Council officials also succeeded in identifying the following actions that have
been taken in recent years. These consist of;
Examining the urban growth portion of the Harare City Master Plan. City Council
can increase its boundaries at an appropriate 40–50 km radius by evaluating its master
plan.
Nearly 20, underdeveloped stands were reported to have been repossessed, and an
additional even if the Urban Council's Act Chapter 29:15 permits the repossession of
undeveloped stands, the policy has drawn criticism for showing little empathy for the
condition of the underprivileged (Mashoko, 2012).
The private developer's pre-sale of partially serviced stands, even while at some point
it is thought that including private developers in the delivery of homes is not a good
way to alleviate the situation of urban poor home seekers, can provide profitable
outcomes if done right.
Nevertheless, this raises concerns about accountability and transparency in order to
lessen the land developers' enormous profits. Subsidised stands maintained by private
developers are available through stringent oversight and assessments. As a result, City
Council must step in and regulate the prices set by private developers for these stands,
or create an ordinance that does so.
”
The study has revealed that private developers have differing opinions about the regulatory
landscape and policy framework. While some developers have expressed contentment with
specific regulations and policies, others have pointed out shortcomings and areas of worry.
The analysis revealed the following themes:
Private developers provided insights into the effectiveness of specific regulations and
policies. They identified areas where the existing framework facilitated social housing
initiatives, such as streamlined approval processes, financial incentives, and land allocation
policies. Developers appreciated regulations that encouraged affordable housing development
and provided clear guidelines for project implementation. These positive aspects were seen as
conducive to the successful delivery of social housing projects. policies
Conversely, private developers also highlighted instances where regulations were perceived
as burdensome, bureaucratic, or lacking clarity, hindering the smooth implementation of
social housing projects. Issues such as complex documentation requirements, lengthy
approval timelines, and inconsistent interpretation of policies were identified as challenges
that impeded progress in social housing initiatives. Developers expressed frustration with the
perceived inefficiencies and barriers posed by these regulations.
Concerns were raised by private developers over a number of shortcomings in the legislative
and policy framework. Among these difficulties were: Zoning Restrictions: The developers
stated that Harare's potential for social housing development was limited by restrictive zoning
laws because some areas were allegedly not developed for social housing, but it was later
discovered that some illegal settlers were now occupying those areas, which lacked social
services. Additionally, zoning laws that restricted construction too expensive or commercial
projects made it difficult to create inexpensive housing alternatives. One example of this is
the Hatcliffe extension created by private developers.
.
Additionally, developers identified a major barrier as limited access to funding, or the
absence of readily available financing choices. They discussed the challenges they had in
obtaining reasonably priced loans or funding especially designed for social housing projects,
such as the 60% interest rate offered on Zimbabwean home mortgages. The lack of financial
tools, including loan guarantee schemes or subsidies, was thought to make social housing
projects less viable.
Private developers also brought up the subject of complicated land acquisition procedures,
citing their ambiguity and complexity as a significant obstacle. Complicated procedures, such
as ambiguous rules, drawn-out bureaucratic procedures, and overlapping jurisdictional
obligations, were blamed for the delays in finding suitable land for social housing projects.
Additionally, the private developers brought up the subject of permit and approval delays,
expressing their dissatisfaction with how time-consuming it is to get the required permits and
approvals. They claimed that there were considerable delays in the approval procedure, which
led to higher project expenses and delays. One of the contributing factors was the ineffective
coordination amongst the pertinent government bodies participating in the approval
procedure.
The researcher interviewed the housing expert on the negative impacts of poor social housing
delivery to Harare residents specifically Hatcliffe residents and found out that, it is important
to consider the potential negative impacts associated with social housing initiatives in Harare,
such as gentrification and displacement. Gentrification refers to the process of urban renewal,
often accompanied by rising property values and the displacement of lower-income residents.
Displacement, on the other hand, refers to the forced relocation of individuals or communities
due to various factors, including redevelopment projects.
-Policy and Planning Measures: Analyzing the existing policy and planning measures can
provide insights into minimizing negative impacts. This includes ensuring comprehensive
urban planning that considers the social, economic, and environmental aspects of housing
development. Policies that prioritize mixed-income communities, affordable housing quotas,
and rent control regulations can help mitigate gentrification and displacement.
-Supportive Services and Resources: Providing support services and resources to vulnerable
communities can help minimize displacement and address the impacts of gentrification. This
can include access to affordable legal assistance, financial counseling, and relocation
assistance programs. Additionally, investing in community infrastructure, such as schools,
healthcare facilities, and public transportation, can contribute to the overall well-being of
residents and reduce the likelihood of displacement.
Through the interviews that were done by the researcher with the housing expert ,it was
pointed out that it is important to examine successful social housing initiatives implemented
in other cities. Lessons learned from these initiatives can inform strategies and approaches
that can be applied in Harare to enhance the effectiveness of social housing delivery through
the engagement of private developers.
-Holistic Approaches: Successful social housing initiatives often adopt holistic approaches
that address not only the provision of affordable housing but also consider social, economic,
and environmental factors. This includes integrating social services, employment
opportunities, and sustainable design principles into housing projects.
-Innovative Financing Models: Exploring innovative financing models can help overcome
financial barriers in social housing delivery. This can include public-private partnerships,
community land trusts, social impact bonds, or creative funding mechanisms that attract
investment and ensure long-term affordability.
There is need for policy reviews with respect to meeting the lowest income earners of
society. According to Mtizwa-Mangiza (1985), policy reform measures create a
conducive environment for donor support and private public partnerships in the
delivery of affordable housing.
There is need for “local authorities to be objective and not subjective in the
implementation of policies. This was mainly cited with reference to the distributive
inequalities realized in the allocation of stands where politicians seem to be grabbing
the lion’s share at the detriment of the disadvantaged members of society.”
There is “serious need to eradicate policies such as first come first serve basis which
ignores the existence of a waiting list. This is justifiable if we are to take into
consideration of people who have been in the waiting list for periods longer than 10
years and who are subject to yearly subscriptions in order to stay on the list.”
City council should “permit low cost building methods for construction to be applied
even by private developers so that they may be able to provide affordable well-
serviced housing given the spiking price levels of building materials.
Government should support the housing project by also assisting local authorities by
financing the projects and also to avail state land to both council and private
developers for future developments.”
Urban expansion by a radius of 40-50 kilometers, acquisition of adjacent farms for
residential developments, convert uses of idle land within the urban areas,
Subsidizing land prices so that stands can be affordable to all home seekers.
4.10 Chapter Summary
The process of “gathering data revealed quite a number of pressing issues that the Local
Authorities of Harare City should attend to in order to address the challenges of affordable
housing. The findings are however in tandem with information available in literature.
Research findings concurred with challenges such as rapid urbanization, economic constrains,
financial shortages, shortage of land, unaffordability, ineffective housing policies etc. as
outlined in literature to be the major setbacks to affordable housing. As revealed by the
escalating housing waiting list each year, local authorities need to come up with feasible
solutions to address issues of affordable housing.
Most responses through questionnaires concurred with the assertion that lack of proper
housing has detriment effects on health and education. Having established all the necessary
facts on the status quo, the next chapter will try to consolidate all the findings and suggest
possible opportunities available to local authorities in striking a balance between the supply
and demand housing ratio.”
Way forward
1) Improve chapter 4
2) Write chapter 5
3) Submit the full dissertation – everything included for my last read.
CHAPTER 5
As proved by the research findings, the issue of private developer engagement in the delivery
of social housing as seen as an issue which arose with issues of unaffordable housing
provision and lack of services in those housing stands which are being provided by private
developers and some unethical practices which the private developers are practicing being
stimulated by their motive of profit making hence the issue of affordable housing remains a
serious issue to local authorities and governments alike. Having identified challenging factors
to the delivery of affordable housing, local authorities are still obliged to champion housing
programs in their localities. With this being the case, local authorities are therefore required
to explore all possible opportunities towards this cause. This chapter will try to sum up all the
highlighted points in this research and try to draw conclusions premised on the outcomes of
the surveys made. Ultimately, recommendations will also be given in an effort to find the
lasting solutions to the challenges.”
5.1 Summary
Chapter One outlined the objectives of the topic which was under study and these included
the;
i. To examine the impact of private developers' involvement on the quantity and quality of
social housing units produced in Harare city.
ii. To assess the motivations and incentives driving private developers to engage in social
housing delivery.
iii. To document the challenges being faced by private developers in social housing delivery
in Harare.
iv. To proffer possible solutions that can be implemented in sustainable social housing
through the engagement of private developers.
The research study was focused on a density suburb Hatcliffe in the city of Harare. The
background of the study highlighted that the social housing problems in Harare emanated in
the post-colonial era and over the years the situation had worsened. The repealing of the
colonial policing had led to an increase in the rural- urban migration hence causing the
increase in demand for social housing which was tried to be curbed for by engagement of
private developers in social housing delivery projects and they were given access to acquire
state land for those projects. Since the housing backlog escalated to a number beyond the
possible demand for eradicating the shortage and also overcrowding which saw an increase in
the number of squatter camps had continuously increased reflecting the housing poverty in
the city of Harare.
The statement of the problem queries that ddespite the growing demand for affordable
housing and the critical need for social housing provision, there is a lack of comprehensive
research that examines the potential challenges and considerations associated with private
developer involvement, which is crucial for ensuring successful and equitable social housing
outcomes. Challenges in the provision of sustainable social housing through the engagement
of private developers had become more prevalentt in Harare. Barriers of progress in the
housing provision encompassed urbanization, economic instability, shortage of land, financial
constraints, shortage of plant and resources for servicing stands and weak policies.
The literature reviewed showed that social housing delivery through the engagement of
private developers need review of existing relevant and recent information about social
housing delivery through the engagement of private developers in this housing delivery. It
assesses the impacts of private developers’ engagement in social housing delivery, the
challenges that are being encountered by the residents of privately developed areas and
possible challenges to such difficulties, and an assessment of the motivations and incentives
driving private developers to engage in social housing delivery as well as the guide on the
possible solutions that can be implemented in sustainable social housing delivery through the
engagement of private developers in social housing delivery. Shortage of housing had
negative effects on the health, access of basic services, living conditions, education and this
caused socio- economic problems.
To ease the housing problems the vertical housing was adopted to efficiently use the available
land. South Africa on the other hand witnessed an increase on the urban population and to
address the situation the government of South Africa had resolved to construct low income
housing for the urban poor.
For the research approach the researcher employed the qualitative and the quantitative
approach to assess social housing delivery in through the engagement of social housing
delivery. This allowed the exploration of the in depth information, views and perspectives of
different individuals on the topic under study. The descriptive approach was administered for
research. The target population was residents for Hatcliffe and the sample size of 33
respondents was established.
The convenience sampling and the purposive sampling were also employed to capture
different view ad perspectives from different people. The data collection was conducted
through observation, interviews and questionnaires. The results from the data collected was
presented in tabular form, graphically, statistically and descriptively analyzed. The findings
revealed that there are some challenges which are faced by Hatcliffe residents due to private
developer’s engagement in the social housing delivery and housing and also some
recommendations for resolution was outlined through this research.
5.2 Conclusions
Findings from the research process on the million dollar question of whether the engagement
of private developers in social housing delivery is effective I resolving the issue of inadequate
social housing provisions in Harare hence were presented logically to make a clear analysis.
In terms of the challenges that are being faced by both private developers and local
authorities are economic constrain and financial shortages which emerged to be the biggest
challenge. According to the findings, this is mainly due to high levels of unemployment and
competition over limited resources due to population growth caused by rapid urbanization
and natural births. The national recession also contributed significantly to poor social housing
delivery through the engagement of private developers.
1. Harare City Council was encountering challenges in the provision of adequate social
housing to its population which had the rapid increment in demand for social housing and the
problem had been in existence in the post-colonial period.
2. Outsourcing the servicing of residential stands paved the way to the private developers for
them to be also involved in the delivery of social housing to home seekers. Unfortunately,
they took it as an opportunity to make more profits at the expense of urban poor people’s
welfare.
3. Economic instability, lack of machinery, financial constraints and shortage of land are
chief factors impeding the provision of social housing in Harare.
4. Lack of adequate social housing led multitudes of squatter camps where people enjoyed
the freedom of not paying any fees for stay.
Hence, one can conclude that social housing delivery through the engagement of social
housing delivery needs the partnership of local authorities to work hand in hand with each
other so as to come up with better results. To address the social housing challenges through
the engagement of private developers, this study is suggesting the recommendations
mentioned below.
5.3 Recommendations
There is need for BCC to adopt the vertical construction of housing when building the
houses so as to fully utilize the available land efficiently especially one which is
confined within the urban areas. Vertical construction saves on land as construction is
upward and also it does not require a lot of servicing in terms of roads and sewer.
Also infill stands, which require little or not much servicing, should be opened up to
accommodate the poor in a transparent manner. In line with this, some building
materials that do not need further processing e.g. pit sand, river sand, gravel etc.
should be availed for free with transportation and labour costs only.
It is essential that local authorities and the government prioritize on housing provision
as it does to other services like water and agriculture. “The prioritization will mean
that the large chunk of the budget will be addressing the housing provision. As such
City Council should compile information collected through house hold surveys or on
supplementary valuation rolls so as to come up with accurate and complete profile of
housing and land market. Furthermore it is also recommended that all councils should
up-date their housing waiting lists so that the people that respond will be very genuine
ones.”
BCC should foster and promote public private partnerships especially with private
developers who have the machinery and expertise required to avail housing and to
partner with financial institutions i.e commercial banks and building societies which
will serve as a means for backup finance.
BCC has to encroach to the state land and expand the city to the peri- urban areas by a
radius of 40- 50 kilometers so as to have land to house the home settlers and also
acquiring adjacent farms for residential development.
Barren land designated for other purposes in the master plan can be sold to housing
cooperatives and private developers for the construction of low cost housing and
involving the donors or non-governmental organizations in the construction of low
cost housing as is done in South Africa so as to house the squatters.
BCC has to act as a regulator in the pricing of the residential stands; it has to have an
oversight role to ensure that the stands are accessible to everyone including the urban
poor. Failure to adhere to the statutes that regulate the pricing of residential stands
should lead to the imposition of deterrent penalties to the offenders.
There is need for BCC to revise its building codes to “enable the construction of low
cost housing using cheap materials which are durable since the current pricing of
building materials has gone out of hand. In light of this recommendation, there is also
a need to use any locally available suitable building materials. Some local authorities
have introduced use of farm bricks while stones have also been used to construct the
walls. These materials are available locally and they are cheap.”
The respondents each gave his/her best recommendation on what they think City of Harare
Local Authorities should go about in trying to enhance and improve the standards of social
housing delivery in Zimbabwe as a whole. Some of the recommendations are as follows;
Engagement of private sector for financial backup for housing projects to finance
either the city council or the private developers for servicing of the land.
Enforcement of policies on the issuing of development permits to private developers
for instance, they should issue the development permit for only a well serviced land.
References:
Akeju, A.A. (2007) “2nd Emerging Urban Africa International Conference on Housing
Finance in Nigeria”, SehuYar'aduaCenter Abuja.
Albino, V., Bellia, C., & Dangelico, R. M. (2020). Public-private partnerships for
sustainable urban regeneration: A literature review. Sustainability, 12(4), 1526.
Davies, M., Pugalis, L., & Gray, D. (2015). Social housing in the UK: From public
service provider to market actor. International Journal of Housing Policy, 15(3), 273-292.
Davoudi, S., Crawford, J., & Mehmood, A. (2013). Planning for the sustainable
development of medium-sized cities: Conceptual frameworks and future directions.
European Planning Studies, 21(3), 355-366.
Dewa D et al. (2013). Industrial decline in Zimbabwe Gweru post 2000: Which way
now? World Journal of Arts, Commerce and Sciences , Vol. 1, No. 1,
Farha L (Nov 2018): 'Shameful': What's driving the global housing crisis? Saved from
the internet at [Link]
[Link] Accessed on 17 November 2018.
Gilbert, A., & Varady, D. P. (2017). The role of inclusionary housing in local and
regional housing markets. Journal of Planning Literature, 32(4), 343-358.
Healey, P. (2012). Making better places: Urban governance and design in the Western
European city. Palgrave Macmillan.
Imedi N (2016), “An analysis of service delivery satisfaction leve for local authorities in
Zimbabwe.” Case of Victoria Falls Municipal (2010- 2015), Department of Politics and
Public Management Midlands State University Gweru Zimbabwe.
Kamete, A (2000), “The Practice of Cost Recovery in Urban Low Income Housing: A
Discourse with Experiences from Zimbabwe”, Habitat International, 24, 241-260.
Katsande E et al (2014), “Shelter, a Home a House or Housing?”
Liu, N., Shi, W., & Shen, L. (2019). Public-private partnerships in urban infrastructure
projects in China: A critical review. Sustainability, 11(20), 5660.
Lombard, J.J.G., 1996. Housing Strategies and the Urban Poor in South Africa. A brief.
Mapira, J. (2004). “A Historical Perspective of the Problem of Housing and Some
Attempted Solutions in the city of Mutare.”(1890- 2002), Zambezia XXXI (i/ii)
Mashoko, S.G. (2012) “The role of low-income urban housing delivery schemes in
curbing the problem in the city of Mutatre.” Journal of Sustainable Dvelopment in Africa
(Volume 14, No1,2012)
Masimba J (2016), “The causes and consequences of the growth of informal settlements
in ward six and seven of epworth.” Bsc Local Governance Studies, Midlands State
University Gweru, Zimbabwe.
Masocha M, Tevera DS (2003). Open Waste Dumps in Victoria Falls Town: Spatial
Patterns, Environmental threats and Public Health Implications Geographical Journal of
Zimbabwe Nos. 33/34:9-19.
Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part
3:Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1) 9-
18. [Link]
Mugova, C., Mhlanga, O., & Muzenda-Mudavanhu, C. (2020). The role of private
developers in the provision of affordable housing in Zimbabwe: A case study of Harare.
Journal of Construction Project Management and Innovation, 10(1), 2538-2548.
Murie, A. (2010). Social housing in Europe. Routledge.
Smithson, B., Sturzaker, J., & Whitehead, C. (2019). Evaluating the impacts of private
sector involvement in social housing. Routledge.
Whitehead, C. M., & Scanlon, K. (2016). Social housing in Europe II: A review of
policies and outcomes. London School of Economics and Political Science.
Willis, K., & Tait, M. (2017). Social impact assessment for housing initiatives in
Australia: A systematic review. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 35(1), 48-62.
APENDICES
Questionnaire:
Dear Sir/Madam
My name is Mlambo Rutendo Lorraine, currently doing 4th year of the Bachelor of Science
(Honours) Degree in Real Estate Management under the Department of Architecture and Real
Estate. I am carrying out a research titled: “Assessing the impacts of engaging Private
Developers in social housing delivery in Harare City.
I would like to invite your participation in this research by filling in this questionnaire. The
answers you provide will solely be used for academic purposes and are highly confidential. I
would greatly appreciate if you could take a few minutes to complete this form for me.
Please tick or indicate otherwise your answers in the boxes and write in the spaces provided.
3. Occupation/Employment:
Yes ☐ No ☐
b. If No, why
not? ........................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................
....................
c. If Yes, How long have you been on the Housing Waiting List?
………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………
……
8. Comment on the efforts of the Private developers in trying to provide social housing.
Yes ☐ No ☐
If yes what are the problems?
………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………
……
………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………
………
11. Indicate the extent to which you think the following challenges affect the Harare City
Council in providing adequate social housing.
Shortage of Land
Political Interference
12. In your opinion, are the private developers being interested to help residents of
Harare through social housing delivery or they have other interests behind?
…………………………………………………………………………………………..
13. What recommendations/ suggestions would you give to Harare City Council in order
.Please feel free to provide any additional comments, insights, or suggestions related to
private developers' involvement in social housing delivery in Harare.
Thank you for your participation! Your input is valuable to this research study. If you have
any further questions or concerns, please contact [Researcher on 0783791573/
mlambolorraine9@[Link]].
Please tick or indicate otherwise your answers in the boxes and write in the spaces provided.
3. Department:
New developments ☐ services providers ☐ property valuation ☐ other ☐
4. Working experience, state number of years……………………….
5. Are there any challenges you are facing in social housing delivery?
Yes ☐ No ☐
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………….................
11. Indicate the extent to which you think the following challenges affect Harare City
Council in Social Housing Delivery to the Public.
Challenges Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
Agree Disagree
Shortage of Land
Political Interference
12. What recommendations would you give for the improvement of social housing
delivery in Harare?
………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………
…………………………………………………………………………
1. Can you provide an overview of your organization and your involvement in social housing
projects in Harare City?
2. How many housing projects have you undertaken in Harare City over the past five years,
and what is the scale of these projects?
3. Who are the target beneficiaries of your social housing projects? Are there any specific
demographic groups you aim to serve?
4. What motivated your organization to engage in social housing projects, and what goals or
objectives are you aiming to achieve?
6. What measures do you take to ensure the construction quality and durability of the housing
units you develop?
7. Can you discuss any collaborations or partnerships you have established with the
government or other stakeholders to facilitate social housing delivery?
8. What are the benefits, challenges, and lessons learned from these collaborations or
partnerships?
9. How do you perceive the existing regulatory environment and policy framework for social
housing delivery in Harare City? Are there any specific regulations or policies that you find
effective or inadequate?
10. Based on your experience, what recommendations or suggestions do you have for
improving the regulatory environment to support social housing initiatives?
1. What are the main challenges to social housing delivery in Harare City?
2. How effective is the involvement of private developers in addressing housing needs in
Harare?
3. What successful strategies promote affordability in social housing projects in Harare?
4. What role should local authorities play in regulating private developers engaged in social
housing?
5. How can negative impacts like gentrification and displacement be minimized in Harare?
6. What lessons can be learned from successful social housing initiatives in other cities?
7. How important is community participation in social housing projects in Harare?
8. What policy changes would enhance the effectiveness of private developers in social
housing delivery in Harare?
9. Are there financing models that support social housing projects with private developers in
Harare?
10. How can the long-term sustainability of social housing developments in Harare be
ensured?
Appendix 5: Interview Guide for Local authorities
1. Can you provide an overview of the current housing situation in Harare City, particularly
in terms of the housing challenges?
2. What is your role in facilitating social housing delivery in Harare City?
3. How do you engage with private developers in addressing the housing needs of the city's
residents?
4. What criteria do you use when selecting private developers to participate in social housing
projects?
5. Are there any specific policies or regulations that govern the involvement of private
developers.
6. What strategies or mechanisms are in place to ensure that the housing units developed by
private developers meet quality standards and are suitable for the intended beneficiaries?
7. How do you balance the need for affordable housing with the profit-driven motives of
private developers?
8. What measures are taken to ensure that social housing projects are inclusive and cater to
different income groups within the city?
9. Based on your experience, what are the key lessons learned and recommendations for
improving the standards on the engagement of private developers in social housing delivery?
Appendix 6: Interview Guide for a Government Official in Housing
Department.
a) Age…………………………
b) Working experience in social housing………………….
2. What is the role and responsibility of the government housing department in addressing the
housing needs of the population?
3. What are the main challenges and barriers the government faces in providing affordable
housing to the citizens?
4. How does the government collaborate with private developers and other stakeholders to
facilitate housing delivery?
5. What policies or regulations does the government have in place to ensure the quality and
affordability of housing projects?
6. Can you provide examples of successful government-led housing initiatives that have had a
positive impact on the community?
7. How does the government prioritize the allocation of housing resources to different income
groups and vulnerable populations?
8. What strategies does the government employ to promote inclusive and ensure access to
housing for marginalized communities?
9. How does the government assess the social and economic impact of housing projects on
the local communities?
10. What measures are taken to address issues such as gentrification, displacement, and the
preservation of existing communities during housing development?
11. How does the government monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of its housing programs
and policies?