When I reflected back and thought about what I do to make students be more
engaged in their lessons a few things came to mind. This question kept arising, so after
talking with other colleagues and doing a little research, this led me to where I am now.
Of course, this is the unique challenge with teaching, there is no “one-size-fits-all”
strategy that has led me to explore this research question. I knew there would be many
variables that came into play when studying student engagement. How technology and
other strategies will increase student engagement, brings a lot of interest for me. A
significant factor that comes up is that each student is different and has unique needs
when it comes to reading and writing. A collective mixture of strategies that occasionally
work for some students, may work for other students under different variables. Some
students are really independent and can pick up the objective the first time. Others need
multiple reminders and are easily distracted. Some students are more auditory compared
to visual learners and that needs to be considered when choosing what works best for my
students (Gardner, & Hatch, 1989) What will be the best way to give feedback to my
students on how their work habits and engagement is going? It really comes down to
knowing what your students’ needs are and how I can accommodate those as best as
possible while keeping the class moving. This will be addressed with multiple student
engagement strategies in this chapter. For example how to use technology and other
interactive strategies, constructivism and collaboration, how students learn, interactive
whiteboards and iPads, student to teacher relationships, classroom climate, how to
incorporate music into the classroom, student choice, and flexible seating.
Technology and Interactive Strategies
Technology opens the door for so many options for students to engage and learn
outside of the classroom. These articles focus on how using technology at school or
flipped lessons at home can help students learn in a different and hopefully a more
effective way. Technology has a unique way to empower students and share ideas to
fellow students to explore new knowledge for their personal learning. Having access to
unlimited information and the ability to share that research is growing and bringing
students together.
Constructivism and Collaboration
Great ideas and plans come together through hard work and collaborating with
coworkers over time. We are more connected and collaborate more than we ever have in
the past. Over the years, research and surveys have shown that teacher lectures and
joining in seminars that require students or even other educators to sit and listen for a
long period of time has changed (Barnett & Coate, 2005). Years ago lectures from an
hour to multiple throughout the day were common and there were many that students or
staff needed to be at. This was a popular way to gain information from professors or
colleagues. Nowadays there are more options listening to online seminars, podcasts or
online classes to soak up that information. We are more aware of students coming into
our classrooms with different ranges of backgrounds and skill sets. Students have
experience with technology and want it to be a part of their daily engagement (Franklin & Van
Harmelen, 2007; Oblinger & Oblinger, 2005). Rather than fight this trend, teachers
are finding ways to adapt and engage students.
Education has also been undergoing a paradigm shift moving away from
teaching-as-instruction towards student-centred learning (Jonassen, 1993; Ramsden,
1992). As a consequence, curricula have been increasingly designed around learning
outcomes rather than content (Lin & Hsieh, 2001). Focusing on individual learning
outcomes has highlighted the role of different styles of learning (Kolb, 1984). This has
necessitated college professors to review both the mode of delivery (instructive,
participative, reflective, etc.) and the form of assessment given to students, e.g. individual
or group.
When we look at how students learn there are a few different theories, including
constructivist and collaborative models. Alavi, who wrote about computer-mediated
collaborative learning in 1994 suggested that three factors are needed to promote
effective learning: ‘‘active learning and knowledge construction, cooperation and
teamwork in learning, and problem solving”. Both of these models, constructivist and
collaborative learning, incorporate these factors but with different pedagogical emphasis.
In the constructivist model, people learn best by actively constructing their own
learning: students are presented with opportunities to build on prior knowledge and
understanding in order to construct new knowledge and understanding. To be successful
this model requires learner-centered instruction: educational materials need to be
provided that helps the student to discover things for themselves rather than via passive
tuition (Lin & Hsieh, 2001). This model can be broken down in four steps. First, all knowledge is
constructed through a process of reflective abstraction. Next is the
cognitive structures within the learner facilitate the process of learning. Another is the
cognitive structures in individuals are in a process of constant development. Lastly, if the
notion of constructivist learning is accepted, then the methods of learning and teaching
must agree. O'Loughlin (1992) believed that for knowledge construction to happen
students are to think outside the box. Be inventive, try out new hypotheses, and explore
possibilities and present the best solution they can come up with.
Cooperative or collaborative learning is more hands-on and with a team. There
are projects to be built along with discussions and team accountability. According to Lin
and Hsieh (2001), the learning happens during this method when students are
collaborating and sharing ideas or thoughts to grow their understanding. This is different
from constructivism because the learning is not just researched or found, it is shared. The
more information that is shared the more learning will serve as the outcome. Learners
have prior knowledge of a topic and student participation is key for this method to be
successful.
There are a number of benefits when it comes to collaborative learning. Georgia
Lazakidou (2010) believed these are increasing student involvement with the subject
matter, enhance critical thinking skills, promote problem-solving skills between students,
and encourage student achievement and learning.
This fits well with my capstone project for a few reasons. Students are changing
the way they learn everyday. The more and more we can adapt to how students learn and
find ways to increase their engagement, we will find more success in the classroom.
Student Learning
According to Breenald (2002), there are three modalities of learning. The first is
visual learning. This includes being able to search and share information on the internet,
handwrite or type information on the board, and share pictures or videos that you or
students create. Visuals promote a student’s ability to process and organize information
(McKendrick & Bowden, 1999). This can also lead to higher level thinking because of
the challenge that the visual presents to the student (Smith & Blankinship, 2000). This is
very important to tap into and understand how students in today's classroom are learning.
Visual and auditory learning along with how parents and teachers are motivated and
involved in a child’s learning are vital for a student’s educational achievements.
The second is auditory learning, which includes activities that can read orally the
sounds of words, speeches, and poems. This can also include books, music and
documentaries. The third piece of the modality learning is tactile. Being able for students
to personally and physically interact with the board can help students that are more tactile
learners (Breeland, 2002). The engagement piece is strong, especially for the younger
grades in elementary. A downside is that only one student or teacher can write on it at
once. This can lead to more wait time for other students or being uncomfortable writing
in front of their peers.
Breeland (2002) shared some insight about this as well. He continues that student
engagement is crucial for student motivation during the learning process. Parent
involvement, teacher motivation and skills, and effective use of technology are all factors
that help engage students in learning. Technology provides opportunities for teacherabout meet the
needs of students with various learning styles through the use of multiple media
(Bryant & Hunton, 2000).
These methods of student learning are very important and play a big role when
focusing on student engagement in my project. I have included multiple strategies that
will fall into these learning styles for students. For example music for auditory learners,
technology for visual learners and building relationships and classroom climate to help
bridge the parent to teacher and teacher motivation for student success.
Interactive Whiteboards and iPads
One form of technology that hit a strong popular streak was in the early 2000’s
with interactive whiteboards. These are SMART whiteboards that students can write and
move words, numbers and pictures to help educate and interact. The ability to write,
share and surf the web all on this screen while students could see and interact was great.
The one big downfall was that this was one board and with multiple students in the room
it wasn’t always easy for each student to be engaged.
Another transformative device that has been integrated in the classroom is the
iPad. The iPad was first introduced in 2010 and has been researched and investigated by
many professionals and educators about its use in education. Overall feedback was
optimistic and positive, but students did not really feel there was much more improved
learning happening in the classroom. Another initiative happened in a US graduate
management program. Hall and Smith (2011) described it as while learning outcomes
were not significantly improved, student convenience and flexibility were enhanced,
along with aspects of environmental sustainability. A third study provided feedback tabout the needs of
students with various learning styles through the use of multiple media
(Bryant & Hunton, 2000).
These methods of student learning are very important and play a big role when
focusing on student engagement in my project. I have included multiple strategies that
will fall into these learning styles for students. For example music for auditory learners,
technology for visual learners and building relationships and classroom climate to help
bridge the parent to teacher and teacher motivation for student success.
Interactive Whiteboards and iPads
One form of technology that hit a strong popular streak was in the early 2000’s
with interactive whiteboards. These are SMART whiteboards that students can write and
move words, numbers and pictures to help educate and interact. The ability to write,
share and surf the web all on this screen while students could see and interact was great.
The one big downfall was that this was one board and with multiple students in the room
it wasn’t always easy for each student to be engaged.
Another transformative device that has been integrated in the classroom is the
iPad. The iPad was first introduced in 2010 and has been researched and investigated by
many professionals and educators about its use in education. Overall feedback was
optimistic and positive, but students did not really feel there was much more improved
learning happening in the classroom. Another initiative happened in a US graduate
management program. Hall and Smith (2011) described it as while learning outcomes
were not significantly improved, student convenience and flexibility were enhanced,
along with aspects of environmental sustainability. A third study provided feedback about an exam in
Canada (Hall & Smith, 2011). Even though the students enjoyed the idea of
using the iPad and saving a significant amount of paper resources, students still felt
uneasy about the extra stress it could cause while grading and submitting as well as
unreliable internet.
On the other hand, Mango (2015) reported increased retention and performance in
mathematics with students using a tablet. A few reasons being that students could
research content and videos from the internet and find audio files of instructors
reteaching the content. This can lead to deeper understanding and practice in or outside of
the common classroom. Extended directions or examples that could not be shared with
just a piece of paper. This has been proven not only in the United States, but in other
countries all over the world. We are seeing an increase with 1:1 iPads in classrooms and
it looks like they are here to stay.
As our society becomes more and more driven with technology, education will be
right alongside it. Ever since I can remember stepping into a school in the mid 90s,
computers and technology have played a role in education. From the early Apple
computers with a floppy disk to the touch screen iPads we are using now, schools
continue to find any way to help engage students.
Technology is such an amazing tool for students to have access to in the
classroom. It opens so many opportunities for students to ask questions and search to find
answers. In my project students will be using technology to help communicate their
thoughts and ideas with me and their peers. They will also be using multiple websites to
help gain more knowledge about the task at hand.
Student-Teacher Relationships
There are many different ways to interact and motivate students. As teachers, we
are in constant practice working with children to build those relationships. Students'
home environments are all unique in certain situations so the first step is to build a
positive and safe relationship with the child to help in any way we can.
Building strong relationships between parents, teachers and students is one of the
first steps in having a successful school year (Finn,1989). Teachers need to set the
expectations for the students, while the parents and teachers work together for the
common well being of the student. Student engagement is not all about academics.
Research has been conducted about school completion compared to dropout rates because
of student engagement. The Participation–Identification Model, created by Finn (1989)
was a theory set up by crucial variables for students to be engaged and successful in
school. In general, if you participated and had some successes or feeling of
accomplishment you would more than likely complete school and graduate.
Classroom Climate
Classroom Climate has so much to do with how successful a classroom of
students can be. Each day is a different challenge, but that is where the professional
techniques and strategies come into play. I like how some of these articles focus on the
pedagogy side of student engagement. It is not just a teacher’s job to help students learn,
but to actively strengthen their capacity to learn. It lays out that there are gaps in
engaging students, but there are ways to help shrink that gap.
Classroom climate can be defined as a cumulation of many students' feelings
about each other and the teacher (Graham, & Gisi, 2000) It is a reflection of students’
opinions of their academic experience and their struggles from class to class. How does
this all fit together on a minute to minute or month to month basis? The relationships
built and shared in a classroom over time is the foundation of classroom climate
Student Choice
Giving students choices can be a great way to motivate them in the classroom and
adapt to their individual learning styles. It can empower and make them feel more
responsible for their learning (Kohn, 1993). When students notice that there is a choice
available it begins to build trust with the teacher and the students will more than likely
work harder toward that goal (Kohn, 1993).
Student choice is considered to have a similar set of benefits to those associated
with personalized learning (Kohn, 1993). It is such a great way to help motivate and
engage students if it is a favorite or least favorite lesson. This empowers the students and
builds trust between them and the teacher, which leads to more involvement during the
discussion or activity. They get to choose topics that they are passionate about and want
to learn more about. Another benefit of a more personal learning structure can also help
implement strategies for at-risk students. In 2014, Hanover researchers shared from their
conclusions that students will experience an overall greater personal well-being if they
perform high in the academic environment Studies have found that students given a
degree of choice about their learning showed improvement on standardized tests.
Flexible Seating
Utilizing the option of flexible seating can make a big difference in how a student
is engaged in a lesson (Espey, 2008). Not only could it help a student be more connected
to the task at hand, but it could also play a role in how they communicate with others,
their body language and even how they feel about themselves.
According to Espey (2008), student learning may be impacted by various physical
characteristics of their learning environment, not by which is the chair or seating style. In
fact ergonomically correct chairs and seating styles have been found to be a really
important element in the classroom environment.
Music
Using music in the classroom can change the way students focus and relax during
work time. There are so many different genres or motivators when it comes to music.
Many students enjoy music during work time so if that can be integrated in the lesson that
can show some positive effects (Ritter & Ferguson, 2017)