0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views20 pages

Lubricant Challenges for Low GWP Refrigerants

Uploaded by

Alan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views20 pages

Lubricant Challenges for Low GWP Refrigerants

Uploaded by

Alan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Lubricant Development to Meet

Lower GWP Refrigerant


Challenges
2014 Purdue Conference
Refrigerant & Lubricant
Design & Analysis I

Joe Karnaz
Global Technology Leader
July 17th, 2014

© 2014 CPI. All rights reserved.


What are the Challenges?
 Miscibility Primary focus for
this discussion.
 HFC - 32
Secondary focus
 HFO Blends
for this discussion.
 Solubility
 HFO-1234ze(E)
 HC (R-290)
 Stability
 HFO-1234yf
 Maintaining Performance and Reliability
 All new refrigerants
© 2014 CPI. All rights reserved. 2
Why are We Facing Challenges
• Refrigerants with High Global Warming Potential (GWP) Values
• Additional Concerns with:
• High Pressure
• Flammability
• Maintaining or Improving Performance
Refrigerant GWP Safety and Other Considerations Misc.
Rating of slightly flammable. Considered to be an R-134a
HFO- Class of compounds that has an replacement but potentially not a
1 unsaturated bond. drop-in. Currently used as a low
1234ze(E)
GWP foam blowing agent.
Rating of slightly flammable. Currently used in R-410A refrigerant
HFC-32 675 as a blend component at 50%.

Non-toxic and could be slightly Alternatives for HFC-404A; HFC-


flammable to non-flammable. 410A; HFC-134a and HCFC-22.
HFO Blends Various GWP values from 100 to 1000. Mainly blended with other HFC
refrigerants.
3
Industry Interaction

© 2014 CPI. All rights reserved. 4


Lubricant and Refrigerant Interaction Properties

Why are they important?


• Initial investigation for what combination will work best.
• Preliminary investigation into system optimization.
• Cost effective analysis.
• Able to evaluate in a timely manner.
 Important Interactions
• Miscibility
• Solubility / Working Viscosity
• Stability
© 2014 CPI. All rights reserved. 5
Miscibility
Lower Critical
IMMISCIBLE Solution
Temperature
(CST)
TEMPERATURE

MISCIBLE

Upper Critical
Solution
Temperature
IMMISCIBLE (CST)

CONCENTRATION
6
Solubility

7
Pressure-Viscosity-Temperature (PVT)

400
200
1.5 bar
100
50
30
20
2 bar

10
7
Kinematic Viscosity, cSt

5
2.5 bar

3 bar

0% neat lube
3
4 bar

5 bar

2 5%
6 bar

8 bar

10%
10 bar

12.5bar

15 bar
1

0.75 20%

0.5 5.5339822
30%
-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130

© 2014 CPI. All rights reserved.


8
Stability

• Quick way to evaluate a


refrigeration system
• Test compatibility of materials
• Evaluate system reliability
New Oil 8 Weeks 9
Lubricant Optimization

© 2014 CPI. All rights reserved. 10


HFC -32 – Miscibility

© 2014 CPI. All rights reserved. 11


HFC -32 – Working Viscosity
Maintaining Miscibility but what is sacrificed?

Miscibility, Working Viscosity at Max


POE Viscosity Refrigerant
10% Load Condition
VG 32 (Current) HFC-410A -35°C 7.2 cSt

VG 32 (New) HFC-32 -35°C 5.5 cSt

VG68 (Current) HFC-410A -15°C 12.0 cSt

VG68 (New) HFC-32 -15°C 9.0 cSt

© 2014 CPI. All rights reserved. 12


HFC -32 – Working Viscosity

Making changes to improve viscosity.


Miscibility, Working Viscosity at Max
POE Viscosity Refrigerant
10% Load Conditions
VG 32 (Current) HFC-410A -35°C 7.2 cSt

VG 32 (New) HFC-32 -35°C 5.5 cSt

VG32 (Current) HFC-32 10°C 6.0 cSt


Viscosity
HFC-32 5°C 6.9 cSt
Change

© 2014 CPI. All rights reserved. 13


Solubility – HFO-1234ze(E)

R-134a and HFO-1234ze(E) Comparison

600C and 7.5 bar; Viscosity at 400C


% Dilution and Dilution

POE Lubricant and


R-134a 15% 22 cSt

POE Lubricant and


HFO-1234ze(E) 25% 7 cSt

14
Working Viscosity – HFO1234ze(E)
120

100
Working Viscosity
Viscosity vs. Temperature
80 3 Bar
cSt

R-134a
60
Viscosity Change
HFO-1234ze(E)
40

20

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

0C
15
Working Viscosity – HFO1234ze(E)
14

12 Working Viscosity
Viscosity vs. Temperature
10
10 Bar
8
cSt

R-134a
Viscosity Change
6
HFO-1234ze(E)

0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120

0C
16
Working Viscosity – HFO1234ze(E)
25

Working Viscosity
20 Viscosity vs. Temperature
10 Bar
15
cSt

R-134a
Chemistry Change
10 HFO-1234ze(E)

0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120

0C
17
Miscibility – HFO/HFC Blends
ISO ISO ISO
32 32 68 First Look!
10% -15 -25 0
POE Lubricants

• HFO refrigerants blended with


HFC refrigerants can have
20% -10 -20 5 similar properties to some HFC
refrigerants.
• Whether HFO-1234yf or HFO-
ISO ISO ISO 1234ze(E) is used could dictate
if slight changes are required to
32 32 68
maintain miscibility properties.
• Overall POE lubricants can be
10% -30 -25 -20
used with both HFO and
HFO/HFC blends of
20% -20 -20 -15 refrigerants.

© 2014 CPI. All rights reserved. 18


Conclusions
• Challenges exist when changes are made.
• Some lower GWP refrigerants could require investigation
for optimization with lubricants.
• HFC-32 and HFO-1234ze(E) appear to behave different
than some traditional refrigerants regarding miscibility,
solubility and working viscosity.
 These properties will need to be measured and not
estimated or modeled for accurate evaluation.
• Lubricants like POE typically used with HFC refrigerants
are good options for HFO/HFC refrigerant blends.
© 2014 CPI. All rights reserved. 19
Thank You

© 2014 CPI. All rights reserved.

You might also like