Epe 2023122914453948
Epe 2023122914453948
[Link]
ISSN Online: 1947-3818
ISSN Print: 1949-243X
Keywords
Photovoltaic Energy, Energy Storage, Lithium-Ion Accumulator, Modeling,
MATLAB/Simulink Simulation
DOI: 10.4236/epe.2023.1512029 Dec. 29, 2023 517 Energy and Power Engineering
T. T. Guingane et al.
1. Introduction
In a report by the International Energy Agency (IEA), the world final energy
consumption in 2021 is estimated at 418 EJ (ExaJoule) compared with 194 EJ in
1973, an increase of 115% in 46 years [1]. In the global energy environment, there-
fore, we are witnessing a growing trend in energy demand, as well as increasing
scarcity and persistent instability in the main areas of production of fossil energy
sources. In addition, there are the effects of fossil fuels on climate changed and the
continued degradation of the environment [2]. As a result, global energy policies
are focusing on renewable energies such as solar photovoltaics (PV). However, the
intermittent nature of this energy source is a barrier to its widespread use [3]. In-
deed, the production of PV electrical energy depends essentially on meteorolog-
ical data, which in no way follows consumption needs.
Energy storage is the best possible way of making renewable energies such as
solar PV permanent. The techniques used for energy storage are numerous and
their performance depends on the field of application [4]. Of these storage tech-
niques, electrochemical accumulators are the most widespread, and lithium-ion
technologies are now a mature and credible alternative [5]. Li-ion batteries have
excellent energy density, no memory effect and a long service life. This technol-
ogical prowess will provide new directions and form the basis for development
and innovation in the mobile electronics sector, the housing sector and, above
all, the automotive sector, where the major firms are throwing themselves into
the clean vehicle battle [6].
The aim of this work will be to contribute to making photovoltaic solar energy
available at all times through storage in batteries. More specifically, we will ex-
amine the behaviour of lithium-ion batteries when integrated into a PV grid, and
assess their ability to withstand high power levels.
To do this, we will first use Matlab Simulink to model the photovoltaic mod-
ule, the Buck-Boost converter, the lithium-ion batteries and other elements of
the PV-L system. Finally, we will analyse the performance indices of the system.
Finally, we will analyse system performance indices (PV-Li) such as battery
voltage and power response during charging conditions using a simulation with
real data, as well as a comparative study of several battery technologies to find
the maximum power for each battery technology.
(March, April, May). This all too often leads to malfunctions at all levels, both in
the administration and in the classrooms at the CENTRE.
The results of an energy audit carried out on site enabled us to draw up a
quantitative and qualitative assessment of the electrical equipment used in the
center and their consumption. Analysis of these results enabled us to obtain the
CENTRE’s hourly load table (Table 1), and thus to draw up the load curve (Figure
1).
In red, corresponds to the CENTER’s power demand during SONABEL’s peak
periods. SONABEL’s peak hours are from 10 am to 2 pm and from 4 pm to 7 pm.
During these hours, SONABEL’s demand for power is enormous, causing cov-
erage problems.
We therefore propose to hybridise the main power supply (SONABEL) with a
PV field, taking into account the need, but also the constraint linked to the sur-
face area available for the installation of a large field at the CENTRE.
3. System Sizing
The PV system is sized for a daily requirement covering not only the peak pe-
riod, but also taking into account SONABEL load shedding/outages. The sizing
of the batteries therefore requires particular attention in order to optimise their
service life and, at the same time, reduce the overall cost of the system [7]-[18].
where Bj is the daily requirement, Ej is the solar radiation of the worst month,
ηbat is the battery efficiency and ηins is the plant efficiency.
Number of modules in series
Vins
NmS = (2)
Vm
Time of day 00 h - 01 h 01 h - 02 h 02 h - 03 h 03 h - 04 h 04 h - 05 h 05 h - 06 h
Analysis of the CENTRE’s energy balance shows that the energy requirement
during peak hours is Bj = 230 kWh. Table 2 shows the sizing results.
We’ve set the DC bus operating voltage to 150 V. This means that the conver-
ters used must all have 150 V outputs.
4. Simulation Result
4.1. System Response under Load
Figure 3 shows the power transfers between system components over the course
of the day.
Figure 4 shows the variations in battery, PV array and load voltages over the
course of the day. In this figure, the battery terminal voltage is virtually constant.
This means that the batteries are not subject to overcharging or undercharging
during the day.
Figure 3. Variation of available power, PV field, battery and SONABEL over the course of the day.
5. Discussion
The purpose of the power exchanges is to keep the CENTER’s loads operational
throughout the day. This indicates that the coupling of the main power supply
and the backup power supply (PV system with storage) is able to support de-
mand during the daytime hours.
Figure 3 shows:
From 0:00 to 7:00 and from 22:00 to 23:59, the available power is practically
zero. This is because demand in the CENTER is almost negligible (225 W)
compared to demand at other times of the day. This power is supplied exclu-
sively by the main power supply. As there is virtually no irradiance, the PV
field does not produce, and the batteries are also ordered not to supply power
under these conditions (only in the event of load shedding and at peak
times).
From 7:00 am to 10:00 am, the available power and the main supply curve are
the same. This means that SONABEL always supplies the power needed for
the load. As solar radiation increases, so does the power produced by the PV
array. At the same time, the power of the battery bank increases in the nega-
tive direction, indicating the load. In this way, the energy produced by the
PV field is stored in the batteries.
From 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. (peak hours), the PV-battery system supplies
the power required for charging, as the main power supply is cut off. We can
also see that as irradiance increases, so does the power of the PV array, and
conversely the power of the batteries decreases, becoming negative when the
power supplied by the PV array exceeds demand (from 12:00 onwards). The
intervention of the batteries indicates that the PV field is unable to meet de-
mand, but when the PV field power is high enough, the batteries begin to re-
charge.
From 2:00 pm to 4:00 pm we’re in peak hours, so the main source resumes
supplying energy for load operation. Energy from the PV field is used to charge
the batteries.
From 4:00 pm to 7:00 pm (peak hour), the main power source is cut off, and
the PV field and batteries ensure load operation until 6:00 pm. From 18:00 to
19:00, the batteries alone supply the load. For this reason, in this section, bat-
tery power is superimposed on available power.
After 7:00 p.m., the main power supply takes over, providing power for load
operation.
Figure 5 shows that the:
Acid batteries can handle any demand whose power is less than around 4 ×
105 W.
For nickel-cadmium batteries, the maximum power attainable is just under 7
× 105 W.
For nickel-metal-hydride, this power is around 8 × 105 W.
6. Conclusions
At the end of this work, we can say that PV-Li systems are effective for use as a
secondary source in addition to SONABEL in large companies or industries that
do not have a large plot of land for the installation of a complete PV camp. In-
deed, by simulation, such an installation will give the Centre partial autonomy
from SONABEL. The installation should cover the Centre’s needs during power
cuts, and better still, during peak hours when kWh billing is high according to
our considerations.
Tests carried out to assess the ability of different battery technologies to with-
stand high power demands have revealed that lithium-ion models perform best.
However, since the simulation was carried out over a short period of time, it is
not possible to assess long-term performance under variable climatic conditions.
For this reason, we plan to simulate the system over a very long period (around
ten years), taking into account our climatic realities (temperature, radiation) and
our loads.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this pa-
per.
References
[1] IEA (2021) Key World Energy Statistics 2021—Statistics Report. 1-82.
[Link]
[2] Gregg, J.S. and Andres, R.J. (2008) A Method for Estimating the Temporal and Spa-
tial Patterns of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from National Fossil-Fuel Consumption.
Tellus, Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 60, 1-10.
[Link]
[3] Vaïtchemé, M.T. (2019) Modelisation Et Simulation D’Un Système De Stockage
Intégré Dans Un Micro-Réseau Autonome Solaire-Eolien. Master’s Thesis, Univer-
sité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Abitibi-Témiscamingue.
[4] Korsaga, E., et al. (2018) Comparaison et détermination des dispositifs de stockage ap-
propriés pour un système photovoltaïque autonome en zone sahélienne. Journal Inter-
national de Technologie, De l’Innovation, De la Physique, De l’Energie et de l’Environ-
nement (JITIPEE), 4, 1-26.
[5] Hémery, C.-V. (2014) Etudes des phénomènes thermiques dans les batteries Li-ion.
Ph.D. Thesis, Université De Grenoble, Grenoble.
[6] Badey, Q. (2012) Étude Des Mécanismes Et Modélisation Du Vieillissement Des
Batteries Lithium-Ion Dans Le Cadre D’Un Usage Automobile. Ph.D. Thesis, Un-
iversité Paris Sud, Paris.
[7] Habib, A.J. (2014) Influence de la recharge rapide sur les performances des accu-
mulateurs lithium des véhicules électriques dans le cadre de l’utilisation postale.