Introduction To Quantitative Genetics. ISBN 0582243025, 978-0582243026
Introduction To Quantitative Genetics. ISBN 0582243025, 978-0582243026
Visit the link below to download the full version of this book:
https://cheaptodownload.com/product/introduction-to-quantitative-genetics-full-p
df-download/
Introduction to Quantitative Genetics
Fourth Edition
D. S. Falconer
Form erly with Institute o f Cell, A nim al and Population Biology
University o f E dinburgh
and
Trudy F. C. Mackay
D epartm ent o f G enetics
N orth Carolina State U niversity
LONGMAN
Addison Wesley Longman Limited
Edinburgh Gate, Harlow
Essex CM20 2JE, England
and Associated Companies throughout the world.
ISBN 0582-24302-5
8 VARIANCE 122
Components of variance 122
Components as proportions o f the total Estimation o f the degree o f
genetic determination, VGIVp
Genetic components of variance 125
Additive and dominance variance Total genetic variance Interaction
variance Variance due to disequilibrium
Correlation and interaction between genotype and environment 131
Correlation Interaction
Contents v
10 HERITABILITY 160
Estimation of heritability 163
Offspring-parent regression Sib analysis Intra-sire regression o f
offspring on dam Combined estimates
Twins and human data 171
Assortative mating 174
Precision of estimates and design of experiments 177
Offspring-parent regression Sib analyses Selection o f parents
Problems 181
17 SCALE 290
Distribution and variance Interactions Conclusions
Problems 297
This book was written with the intention of providing an introductory textbook,
with the emphasis on general principles rather than on practical applications. I tried
to make the book useful to as wide a range of readers as possible, particularly
biologists who, like myself, have no more than ordinary mathematical ability. The
mathematics does not go beyond simple algebra; neither calculus nor matrix
methods are used. Some knowledge of statistics, however, is assumed, particularly
of the analysis of variance and of correlation and regression.
The second edition kept the same structure but was somewhat enlarged by the
inclusion of developments in the intervening twenty years, and by more attention
being given to plants. In consequence the book came to contain a good deal more
material than is needed by those for whom the subject is part of a course on general
genetics. The section headings, however, should facilitate the selection of what is
relevant. My main regret then, as it is now, was the impossibility of mentioning
more than a very few of the experimental studies that have illuminated the subject
since the book first appeared.
The revisions made in this new edition are less extensive. The desire not to
increase the length of the book has meant that many of the recent developments are
noted by little more than references to the sources. The demonstration that mutation
is not negligible for quantitative genetics has, however, necessitated more substan
tial revision of Chapter 12 and to a lesser extent Chapters 15 and 20.
The Problems, which were hitherto published separately, are now put together
with the text, following the chapters to which they refer. They are of varying diffi
culty and I hope that all students will find some that they can solve immediately
and some also that will tax their ingenuity to the full. Some of the problems are
based on the data and solutions of earlier ones. Students are therefore advised to
keep their workings for later use; this will save the repetition of calculations. I have
based the problems on real data wherever I could, to make them more interesting
and realistic. In consequence, however, the arithmetic seldom works out simply,
and a pocket calculator will be needed for most of them. A few of the problems
have been revised for this edition. The solutions are at the end of the book,
arranged in a different order from the problems so as to avoid the risk of inadver
tently seeing the solution of the next problem. The solutions are not simply answers
but give fairly full explanations of how the problems are solved.
Acknowledgements It is not exaggeration to say that this book could not originally
have been written without the help of Professor Alan Robertson. My understanding
of the subject grew from my frequent discussions with him. I owe the same debt of
X Preface
gratitude to Professor W. G. Hill for his guidance on the preparation of the second,
and now this, edition. Without his advice many of the revisions could not have
been attempted. Dr R. C. Roberts read the manuscripts of the first and second
editions and his suggestions led to many improvements being made. Dr Paul M.
Sharp checked the solutions of all the problems and made many valuable sugges
tions. I have had help also from many other colleagues who have advised me on
particular matters. To all of these, and to my wife who helped me in many ways, I
am deeply grateful. The mistakes and misunderstandings that remain are entirely
my own. I should be grateful to be told of these.
Quantitative genetics is now merging with molecular genetics and this very active
area of the subject needs more consideration than it was given in the previous
edition. Accordingly, a new chapter has been added, on quantitative trait loci
(QTLs) - the location and characterization of the genes causing quantitative varia
tion. Chapter 20, on natural selection, has been largely rewritten, with fuller
treatment of mutation and the maintenance of genetic variation; we hope these
additions will make the book more useful to students of evolutionary quantitative
genetics. In the earlier chapters, the treatment of polymorphism and of neutral
mutation has been expanded, and some sections in the chapters on inbreeding have
been shortened.
We gratefully acknowledge advice from Dr James D. Fry, Professor W. G. Hill,
Dr Peter D. Keightley, Dr Mark Kirkpatrick and Dr Michael Turelli. We are
indebted also to Dr Richard Lyman for producing Figures 21.3 and 21.4, and to Dr
Hartwig H. Geiger for pointing out an error in equation [15.8], which has now been
corrected. Finally, the first author is most grateful to Professor Hill for the hospital
ity provided in his laboratory.
D. S, Falconer
T. F. C. Mackay
March 1995
Acknowledgements
The American Mathematical Society for Fiq. 4.2 adapted from the article
‘Statistical genetics and evolution’ by S. Wright pp. 223-46 Bulletin o f the
Am erican M athem atical Society (1942) Vol. 48; Cambridge University Press for
Fig. 4.1 adapted from the article ‘The genetic structure of populations’ by S. Wright
pp. 323-54 A nnals o f H um an G enetics (1951) Vol. 15; Professor J.W. Dudley for
Fig. 12.3(a) from his paper ‘76 generations of selection for oil and protein percent
age in maize’ in P roceedings o f the International Conference on Quantitative
G enetics: August 16-21, 1976 by E. Poliak, O. Kempthome and T. Bailey Jr
© 1977 by Iowa State University Press; the Genetics Society of America for Fig.
15.2 from the article ‘The effect of inbreeding on the variation due to recessive
genes’ by A. Robertson pp. 189-207 G enetics (1952) Vol. 37, Fig. 17.2 adapted
from the article ‘Selection for small'and large body size in the house mouse’ by
J.W. MacArthur pp. 194-209 G enetics (1949) Vol. 34, Fig. 21.3 from the article
‘The isolation of polygenic factors controlling bristle score in D rosophila
m elanogaster. II. Distribution of third chromosome effects with chromosome sec
tions’ by A.E. Shrimpton and A. Robertson pp. 445-59 G enetics (1988) Vol. 118
and Fig. 21.4 from the article ‘QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an
interspecific tomato cross’ by M.C. de Vincente and S.D. Tanksley pp. 585-96
G enetics (1993) Vol. 134; the International Union of Biological Sciences for Figs
2.2 and 2.3 from the article ‘Asymmetrical responses in selection experiments’ by
D.S. Falconer pp. 16-41 Sym posium on G enetics o f Population Structure Series B
No. 15; Pergamon Journals Ltd for Fig. 15.1 from the article ‘Variation in the
bristle number of D rosophila m elanogaster ’ by M. Rasmuson A cta Zoolog. No. 33;
Professor A. Robertson and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory for Fig. 12.3(c) from
the article ‘Selection in animals: synthesis’ pp. 225-9 C old Spring H arbor
Sym posium on Q uantitative Biology Vol. 20; University of Chicago Press for Fig.
2.4 adapted from the article ‘The elimination of an autosomal lethal from an experi
mental population of D rosophila m elanogaster ’ by B. Wallace pp. 65-6 Am erican
N aturalist No. 97 (1963); B.H. Yoo and Cambridge University Press for Fig.
12.3(b) from the paper ‘Long-term selection for a quantitative character in large
replicate populations of D rosophila m elanogaster ’ pp. 1-17 G enetical Research
No. 35.
While every effort has been made to trace the owners of copyright material, in a few
cases this has proved impossible and we take the opportunity to offer our apologies
to any copyright holders whose rights we may have unwittingly infringed.
Introduction
The extension of Mendelian genetics into quantitative genetics may thus be made
in two stages, the first introducing new concepts connected with the genetic proper
ties of ‘populations’ and the second introducing concepts connected with the
inheritance of measurements. This is how the subject is presented in this book. In
the first part, which occupies Chapters 1 to 5, the genetic properties of populations
are described by reference to genes causing easily identifiable, and therefore qual
itative, differences. Quantitative differences are not discussed until the second part,
which starts in Chapter 6. These two parts of the subject are often distinguished by
different names, the first being referred to as ‘population genetics’ and the second
as ‘quantitative genetics’ or ‘biometrical genetics’.
The theoretical basis of quantitative genetics was established round about 1920
by the work of Fisher (1918), Haldane (summarized 1932) and Wright (1921). The
development of the subject over the succeeding years, by these and many other
geneticists and statisticians, has been mainly by elaboration, clarification, and the
filling in of details, so that today we have a substantial body of theory accepted by
the majority as valid.
The theory consists of the deduction of the consequences of Mendelian inherit
ance when extended to the properties of populations and to the simultaneous
segregation of genes at many loci. The premiss from which the deductions are
made is that the inheritance of quantitative differences is by means of genes, and
that these genes are subject to the Mendelian laws of transmission and may have
any of the properties known from Mendelian genetics. The property of ‘variable
expression’ assumes great importance and might be raised to the status of another
premiss: that the expression of the genotype in the phenotype is modifiable by non-
genetic causes. Other properties whose consequences are taken into account include
dominance, epistasis, pleiotropy, linkage, and mutation. The theory then allows us
to deduce what will be the genetic properties of a population if the genes have the
properties postulated. It allows us also to predict the consequences of any specified
breeding plan, including those of natural selection. It therefore forms the basis for
understanding evolutionary change. The main practical use of the theory is in com
paring the merits of alternative procedures for animal and plant improvement.
The experimental side of quantitative genetics has three roles, complementary to
the theoretical side. First, experimental study of populations allows us to deduce
the properties of the genes associated with quantitative variation. Second, experi
mental breeding allows us to test the validity of the theory. And third, there are
some consequences of breeding procedures that cannot be predicted from the
theory, and questions about these can be answered only by experiment. There is
now a large body of experimental data which substantiates the theory in consider
able detail, showing that the genes concerned with quantitative variation do have
the properties known from Mendelian genetics, and that the outcome of most
breeding procedures can be predicted with some confidence. The aim is to describe
all that is reasonably firmly established and, for the sake of clarity, to simplify as
far as is possible without being misleading. Consequently, the emphasis is on the
theoretical side. Though conclusions will often be drawn directly from experimen
tal data, the experimental side of the subject is presented chiefly in the form of
examples, chosen with the purpose of illustrating the theoretical conclusions. These
Introduction
Chief sources
(For full bibliographical details see list o f References)
Example 1.1
The M-N blood groups in man are determined by two alleles at a locus, and the three
genotypes correspond with the three blood groups, M, MN, and N. The following
figures, taken from the tabulation of Mourant (1954), show the blood group frequen
cies among Eskimos of East Greenland and among Icelanders as follows:
Number o f
Blood group individuals
M MN N
Clearly the two populations differ in these genotype frequencies, the N blood group
being rare in Greenland and relatively common in Iceland. Not only is this locus a
source of variation within each of the two populations, but it is also a source of
genetic difference between the populations.
2 1 Genetic constitution of a population
A population, in the genetic sense, is not just a group of individuals, but a breed
ing group; and the genetics of a population is concerned not only with the genetic
constitution of the individuals but also with the transmission of the genes from one
generation to the next. In the transmission the genotypes of the parents are broken
down and a new set of genotypes is constituted in the progeny, from the genes
transmitted in the gametes. The genes carried by the population thus have continu
ity from generation to generation, but the genotypes in which they appear do not.
The genetic constitution of a population, referring to the genes it carries, is
described by the array of gene frequencies', that is, by specification of the alleles
present at every locus and the numbers or proportions of the different alleles at each
locus. If, for example, Aj is an allele at the A locus, then the frequency of Aj
genes, or the gene frequency of A p is the proportion or percentage of all genes at
this locus that are the Aj allele. The frequencies of all the alleles at any one locus
must add up to unity, or 100 per cent.
The gene frequencies at a particular locus among a group of individuals can be
determined from a knowledge of the genotype frequencies. To take a hypothetical
example, suppose there are two alleles, Aj and A2, and we classify 100 individuals
and count the numbers in each genotype as follows:
A jA j a ,a 2 A2A2 Total
Each individual contains two genes, so we have counted 200 representatives of the
genes at this locus. Each A jA j individual contains two Aj genes and each A jA2
contains one Aj gene. So there are 120 Aj genes in the sample, and 80 A2 genes.
The frequency of A { is therefore 60 per cent or 0.6, and the frequency of A2 is 40
per cent or 0.4. To express the relationship in a more general form, let the frequen
cies of genes and of genotypes be as follows:
Genes Genotypes
Frequencies p q P H Q
p=P+hH
q = Q + hH ..[1.1]
Frequencies of genes and genotypes
Example 1.2
To illustrate the calculation of gene frequencies from genotype frequencies we may
take the M -N blood group frequencies given in Example 1.1. The M and N blood
groups represent the two homozygous genotypes and the MN group the heterozy
gote. The frequency of the M gene in Greenland is, from equation [1.1], 0.835 +
i(0.156) = 0.913, and the frequency of the N gene is 0.009 + 4(0.156) = 0.087, the
sum of the frequencies being 1.000 as it should be. Doing the same for the Iceland
sample, we find the following gene frequencies in the two populations, expressed
now as percentages:
Gene
M N
Greenland 91.3 8.7
Iceland 57.0 43.0
Thus the two populations differ in gene frequency as well as in genotype frequen
cies.
insertions are usually transposable elements: DNA sequences that are present in
multiple, dispersed copies in the genome and that are able to move from location to
location. Other length variation is caused by variation in numbers of tandemly
repeated DNA sequences at ‘minisatellite’ or ‘microsatellite’ loci. The former, also
called VNTR (for variable number of tandem repeat) loci, consist of repeating units
10-60 base pairs long. Microsatellite (or simple sequence repeat, SSR) loci consist
of shorter repeating units of 1-6 base pairs, such as (CA)n or (AGC)^, where n, the
number of repeat units, is variable. Finally, the ultimate level of resolution of varia
tion between individuals is to compare their actual DNA sequences obtained by
direct sequencing.
Allelic variation for discrete traits, whether phenotypically visible or cryptic, is
known as polymorphism, about which more will be said in Chapters 2 and 4.
Polymorphic loci give rise to the variation in quantitative characters, which is the
subject of this book.
Causes of change
Several agencies affect gene and genotype frequencies in the process of transmis
sion of genes from one generation to the next. To understand quantitative genetic
variation fully we need to know how these factors, separately and together, influ
ence genetic variation in populations over time, and what is their relative
importance as agencies of gene frequency change. These agencies form the chief
subject-matter of the next four chapters, but we may briefly review them here in
order to have some idea of what factors are being left out of consideration in this
chapter. The agencies through which the genetic properties of a population may be
changed are these:
Population size The genes passed from one generation to the next are a sample of
the genes in the parent generation. Therefore the gene frequencies are subject to
sampling variation between successive generations, and the smaller the number of
parents the greater is the sampling variation. The effects of sampling variation will
be considered in Chapters 3-5, and meantime we shall exclude it from the discus
sion by supposing always that we are dealing with a ‘large population’, which
means simply one in which sampling variation is so small as to be negligible. For
practical purposes a ‘large population’ is one in which the number of adult indivi
duals is in the hundreds rather than in the tens.
Differences of fertility and viability Though we are not at present concerned with
the phenotypic effects of the genes under discussion, we cannot ignore their effects
on fertility and viability, because these influence the genetic constitution of the suc
ceeding generation. The different genotypes among the parents may have different
fertilities, and if they do they will contribute unequally to the gametes out of which
the next generation is formed. In this way the gene frequency may be changed in
the transmission. Further, the genotypes among the newly formed zygotes may
have different survival rates, and so the gene frequencies in the new generation may
be changed by the time the individuals are adult and themselves become parents.
These processes are called selection, and will be described in Chapter 2. Meanwhile
we shall suppose they are not operating. Human blood-group genes may be taken
Hardy-W einberg equilibrium
frequencies show two important features. First the frequency of the heterozygotes
cannot be greater than 50 per cent, and this maximum occurs when the gene fre
quencies are p = q = 0.5. Second, when the gene frequency of an allele is low, the
rare allele occurs predominantly in heterozygotes and there are very few homozy
gotes. This has important consequences for the effectiveness of selection, as will be
seen in the next chapter.
Example 1.3
^ / _ ) _ 2q . . . [ 1. 3]
(1 - q)2 + 2q(l - q) 1+ q
Test of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium If data are available for a locus where all the
genotypes are recognizable, the observed frequencies of the genotypes can be tested
for agreement with a population in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. According to the
Hardy-Weinberg law, the genotype frequencies of progeny are determined by the
gene frequency in their parents. If the population is in equilibrium, the gene fre
quency is the same in parents and progeny, so the gene frequency observed in the
progeny can be used as if it were the parental gene frequency to calculate the geno
type frequencies expected by the Hardy-Weinberg law. The procedure is illustrated
in Example 1.4.
Example 1.4
The M-N blood group frequencies in Iceland were given in Example 1.1. The
observed numbers in the sample were as in the following table. The gene frequen
cies in the sample are first calculated from the observed numbers by equation [1.1].
Then the Hardy-Weinberg genotype frequencies p 2, 2pq and q2 are calculated from
the gene frequencies by equation [1.2], and each is multiplied by the total number to
get the numbers expected. For example, the expectation for MM is (0.5696)2 X 747.
Comparing the observed with expected numbers shows a deficiency of both homo
zygotes and an excess of heterozygotes. The x2 tests how well, or how badly, the
observed numbers agree with the expected. The discrepancy is not significant and
could easily have arisen by chance in the sampling. Note that this x2 has only 1
degree of freedom because the gene frequency has been estimated from the data, so
that the observed and expected numbers must agree in their gene frequencies as well
as in their totals.
The test for agreement with an equilibrium population is a test of whether the
conditions for the production of Hardy-Weinberg genotype frequencies have been
fulfilled. The conclusions that can be drawn from the test, however, are limited.
When good agreement is found, the test gives no reason to doubt the fulfilment of all
the conditions. Tests made with blood-group genes nearly always show very good
agreement, as in Example 1.4. But there is one condition whose non-fulfilment will
not lead to a discrepancy, and that is equal fertility among the parents. The reason