Course Outline - Biomed2024 - V1
Course Outline - Biomed2024 - V1
Faculty of Engineering
Term 1 2024
1
1 Staff
Mentor TBA
2 Course information
Units of credit: 6
Pre-requisite(s) or required knowledge: None
2.1.1 Week 1
Day Time Activity Format Room
2-4 pm Common Lecture Face to Face Clancy
Monday
4-5 pm Poster Session TBA TBA
2-3 pm Common Lecture Face to Face Clancy
2
2.1.2 Week 2 onwards
2-3 pm Common Lecture (Weeks 2-3 Face to face
only) Check
Monday Moodle/Teams
3-4 pm Project Lecture (Weeks 2-4 Face to
for room
only) face/Hybrid
allocations
4-5 pm Mentor Session Face to face
2-3 pm Technical Tutorials (Teams 1-6)
3-4 pm Technical Tutorials (Teams 7-
Thursday 12) Face to Face Matthews 232
4-5 pm Technical Tutorials (Teams 12-
18)
3
2.2 Course summary
Have you ever thought about what life would be like without your hands? How would you
pour a glass of water? How would you play a musical instrument? How would you dress
yourself each day? You would rely so much on people around you, severely hampering your
independence. Simple tasks become heart-wrenchingly impossible, lowering your quality of
life.
The good news is that thanks to biomedical engineers, prosthetic hands exist, and have an
incredibly positive impact on an amputee’s independence. As a biomedical engineer, you
have an opportunity to use technology to dramatically improve the quality of life of an
amputee, helping them re-engage with their environment (see example in Figure 1).
However, the field of prosthetics has exploded in recent times, resulting in overly complex
and expensive designs that aren’t very useful for clients and in most cases too expensive for
most people (Spiers et al., 2021; Young, 2022). When designing prosthetics for clients with a
specific need, we must use engineering design principles to ensure the solution matches
their need.
4
Figure 2: Prosthetic arm for older woman.
[Link]
5. Be able to convey your thoughts and ideas effectively using both written and oral
communication tools.
5
2.5 Relationship between course and program learning outcomes
and assessments
6
3 Strategies and approaches to learning
For most students, this will be your first experience of a university course. University
teaching will be very different compared to what you may have experienced in high school.
As a university student, you will take significantly more responsibility for your own learning.
This section will describe the different strategies used in this course for learning.
3.1 Communication
Microsoft Teams will be used as the communication platform between students and teaching
staff, as well as within your team. Teams is an online collaboration platform that is commonly
used in industry. Using this platform effectively will streamline your team’s work and provide
you with skills that you can apply in nearly any workplace. In Week 2, you will be walked
through how to effectively use Teams. Common lectures may also be delivered through
Teams.
You will need to log in with your zID@[Link] and zPass to access Teams.
3.4 Teamwork
You will complete most of your assessment as a team of 5-6 people total. In week 1, you will
complete an online survey which will ascertain your prior engineering experience. Teams will
then be allocated to ensure this experience is shared evenly across all teams.
7
3.5.1 Lectures
There are three different types of lectures given this term: Engineering Design Lectures,
Project Lectures and Technical Lectures. The lectures will provide the rationale for the
design process followed in the course and some basic engineering principles to act as a
starting point for addressing the Project’s design brief.
Engineering Design lectures will be given in a livestream online format on Mondays 2-3pm
for weeks 2-4, as well as Thursday Week 1.
Project Lectures will be presented in a hybrid format on Mondays 3-4pm for weeks 2 to 3.
Technical lectures will be pre-recorded videos, with approximately 45-60 minutes of
content per week. These must be watched before the tutorial each week and can be found
on Moodle.
8
tutorials during this time. This leaves a 2-hour window for your team to have a regular
meeting.
3.6 Expectations
It is important to identify what students can expect from teaching staff, as well as identify the
expectations that teaching staff have of students.
9
4 Course schedule and structure
This course consists of 6 hours of class contact hours per week. This is broken down into
1. 3 hours lectures
o These lectures will be a mix of online streaming or pre-recorded lectures.
2. 1 x 1-hour mentor session.
3. 1 x 1-hour technical tutorial
o This will be a 1-hour period of study every Thursday (beginning Week 2 at
3pm). Rooms will be allocated based on team number.
4. 1 team meeting
o This will be up to you and your team to schedule.
In the second half of term, the lecture content will be reduced, to give your team more time
to build your design.
Table 1 and Table 2 show the Monday and Thursday Schedule for this course, respectively.
10
Table 1: Monday Schedule
Monday Class
Date Time Activity Location
01
8 Public holiday (Easter Monday)
Apr
2-4
Project build time F2F
08 pm
9
Apr
4-5pm Project mentor session F2F
2-4
Project build time
pm
15
10 F2F
Apr
4-5pm Project mentor session
11
Table 2: Thursday Schedule
Thursday Class
Date Time Activity Location
2-3 pm Common lecture: Teamwork and project management Clancy / Echo 360
1 15 Feb
3-5 pm Common activity: Impromptu design day Various
12
5 Assessment
Team/
Learning
Assessment Length Weight Individual Week Due Submission
outcomes
Assessment
Engineering Engineering Online
Design Project Design Video 20% Team 1,2 4 video
(20%) Process submission
100 to Weekly
150 (first Onenote
Journal words 15% Individual 1, 4, 5 assessment (via
per Monday Teams)
week Week 3)
Design and Design 20-25
build (60%) 10% Team 5 7 Moodle
Proposal pages
Design
N/A 15% Team 1,4,5 10 In person
Performance.
15-20
Final Report. 20% Team 5 11 Moodle
pages
1 quiz
per 20%
Technical Pre-class week (5%
Individual 4 3,4,5,7 Moodle
Stream (20%) Quizzes. (4 per
quizzes quiz)
total)
13
5.1.1 EDP (20%)
This assessment phase measures how well you understand the engineering design process.
14
The total length of the report shall be no more than 25 pages. This task is worth 10% of your
final grade.
Individual contributions will be determined using a special Team Evaluation tool to record the
contribution of your team members, and individual marks will be scaled +/- 25% depending
on contribution.
15
- Submitted via Onenote (Design Journal)
Refer to Table 3 for more information on where to submit assessment items.
16
6 Academic integrity, referencing and plagiarism
Referencing is a way of acknowledging the sources of information that you use to research
your assignments. You need to provide a reference whenever you draw on someone else's
words, ideas or research. Not referencing other people's work can constitute plagiarism.
Further information about referencing styles can be located at
[Link]
Academic integrity is fundamental to success at university. Academic integrity can be
defined as a commitment to six fundamental values in academic pursuits: honesty, trust,
fairness, respect, responsibility and courage (“International Center for Academic Integrity
[ICAI],” n.d.). At UNSW, this means that your work must be your own, and others’ ideas
should be appropriately acknowledged. If you don’t follow these rules, plagiarism may be
detected in your work.
Further information about academic integrity and plagiarism can be located at:
• The Current Students site [Link] and
• The ELISE training site [Link]
The Conduct and Integrity Unit provides further resources to assist you to understand your
conduct obligations as a student: [Link]
17
7 Readings and resources
7.2 Textbooks
Dym, C.L. and Little, P. (2014). Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction,
7.3.2 Moodle
As a part of the teaching component, Moodle will be used for Team evaluations and report
submissions. Assessment marks will also be made available via Moodle:
[Link]
7.3.3 Announcements
Announcements concerning course information will be given in the lectures and/or on Teams
and/or via email (which will be sent to your student email address).
18
8 Course Evaluation and Development
Feedback on the course is gathered periodically using various means, including the UNSW
myExperience process, informal discussion in the final class for the course, and the School’s
Student/Staff meetings. Your feedback is taken seriously, and continual improvements are
made to the course based, in part, on such feedback. In this course, recent improvements
resulting from student feedback to be implemented this year include:
- Aligning the activities in the journal with the sections of the final report.
- Revising the journal to be simpler.
- Streamlining sections of the final report and removing the need to document
manufacture.
- Introducing and refining a design goal of simplicity and ease of use.
- Adding more practical content into the lectures.
- Closer alignment between learning activities, assessments and learning outcomes.
19
9 Additional support for students
• The Current Students Gateway: [Link]
• Academic Skills and Support: [Link]
• Student Wellbeing, Health and Safety: [Link]
• Disability Support Services: [Link]
• UNSW IT Service Centre: [Link]
20
10 Plagiarism
Beware! An assignment that includes plagiarised material will receive a 0% Fail, and
students who plagiarise may fail the course. Students who plagiarise will have their names
entered on the plagiarism register and will be liable to disciplinary action, including exclusion
from enrolment.
It is expected that all students must at all times submit their own work for assessment.
Submitting the work or ideas of someone else without clearly acknowledging the source of
borrowed material or ideas, is plagiarism.
All assessments which you hand in must have a Non Plagiarism Declaration Cover
Sheet. This is for both individual and group work. Attach it to your assignment before
submitting it to the Course Coordinator or at the School Office.
Plagiarism is the use of another person’s work or ideas as if they were your own. When it is
necessary or desirable to use other people’s material you should adequately acknowledge
whose words or ideas they are and where you found them (giving the complete reference
details, including page number(s)). The Learning Centre provides further information on
what constitutes Plagiarism at:
[Link]
11 References
“International Center for Academic Integrity [ICAI],” n.d. The fundamental values of
academic integrity., 3rd ed, International Center for Academic Integrity.
Spiers, A.J., Cochran, J., Resnik, L., Dollar, A.M., 2021. Quantifying Prosthetic and Intact
Limb Use in Upper Limb Amputees via Egocentric Video: An Unsupervised, At-Home
Study. IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics 3, 463–484.
[Link]
Young, B.H., 2022. The Bionic-Hand Arms Race [WWW Document]. IEEE Spectr. URL
[Link] (accessed 1.11.23).
21