0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views1 page

Peer Review Evaluation for Team Members

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views1 page

Peer Review Evaluation for Team Members

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

PEER REVIEW

Name: Bartolay, John Kyle C.


Section: Arch42S8
Rate your Classmate/team members with the following criteria:
5-Outstanding 3- Satisfactory 1- Poor
4- Very Satisfactory 2- Unsatisfactory

Willingness to Participation Contribution Initiative Personal


Listen Evaluation
(Optional)

He/ She His/her He/ She has


respects the He/ She comments are the energy or What can you
team members consistently mostly only on aptitude say about
consistently and participates task and often displayed in his/her
demonstrates without being move the initiation on the performance for
active listening asked. conversation improvement of this Activity?
through body forward. the
language and task/objectives.
tone of Voice.

Agustin, Michael 5 5 5 5 5
Christian A.

Agulto, Andrea G. 5 5 5 5 5

Bartolay, John Kyle C. 5 5 5 5 5

Casabal, Glenn Mark 5 5 5 5 5

Custodio, John 5 5 5 5 5
Emanuele O.

Decena, Angel 5 5 5 5 5

Espiritu, Mikaela 5 5 5 5 5
Gladys Ann C.

Fabros, Crystene Joy 5 5 5 5 5


D.

Huertas, Stephanie 5 5 5 5 5
Nicole

Macarat, Kia Loraine 5 5 5 5 5


M.

Novilla, Vince 5 5 5 5 5
Dominic

Roxas, John Paul G. 5 5 5 5 5

You might also like