Mombasa-Nairobi Railway: Successes & Challenges
Mombasa-Nairobi Railway: Successes & Challenges
net/publication/349991547
CITATIONS READS
8 5,524
2 authors, including:
Nancy Githaiga
Murang'a University of Technology
7 PUBLICATIONS 108 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Nancy Githaiga on 11 March 2021.
Received: November 18, 2020 Accepted: December 23, 2020 Online Published: March 2, 2021
doi:10.5430/rwe.v12n2p258 URL: [Link]
Abstract
This article examined the successes and challenges of Kenya‟s standard gauge railway for users in transport
operations. The constrained operations in Kenya‟s existing colonial railway system have contributed to connectivity
barriers and inefficiencies in the transport sector. Standard Gauge Railway‟s construction aimed to address these
gaps and facilitate cargo and passenger transport operations in Kenya and across borders. This study used a
descriptive research design in the form of a survey and adopted a mixed research method of qualitative and
quantitative data with primary data collected through questionnaires and interviews. The population of interest was
the train users (passengers and cargo transporters). The findings suggested that the railway has generally enhanced
transport operations for passengers and freight through reduced travelling time, improved transport safety and
security, and improved mobility and accessibility. While the SGR has led to reduced travel costs for passengers, the
cost of freight transport remains relatively high.
The SGR has provided an alternative for freight and passenger transport, but there are challenges such as logistical
and administrative challenges in cargo clearance, ticketing issues, and passengers' “First mile and Last mile”
challenges. While the improvement of physical transport infrastructure and connectivity is significant, these
challenges should be transformed into enablers to realize the railway‟s full potential. This research, therefore,
recommends for; effective transfer of the cargo clearance and forwarding paperwork from Mombasa to Nairobi;
development of a transport link between the railway and the two major cities to solve the “first mile” and “last mile”
transport challenges for passengers, and to audit the ticketing system to identify and sanction cartels involved in
ticketing malpractices. The overall conclusion is that generally, the railway has added value in Kenya‟s transport
sector; passengers now have a cheaper, reliable and safer mode of transport while cargo is transported in a more
reliable and safer way. The SGR is thus a transformative infrastructural project for Kenya; it symbolizes a country on
a pressing need to transform herself into a middle-income economy supported by modern infrastructure.
Keywords: Kenya, Standard Gauge Railway (SGR), successes, challenges, transport operations, users
1. Introduction
The Kenya Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) was constructed to connect Kenyan cities and link the country to the
neighbors, like Uganda and beyond. However, this article focuses on Kenya‟s Mombasa-Nairobi phase, which is
complete and functional. Phase 2 of Nairobi to Naivasha is underway while the third phase was also tendered. Thus,
the Mombasa–Nairobi Standard Gauge Railway connects Mombasa‟s vast Indian Ocean city with Nairobi, the
country‟s capital and largest city (Githaiga & Bing, 2019). This SGR runs parallel to the narrow-gauge Kenya-
Uganda Railway, completed under British colonial rule in 1901. Its operator is Kenya Railways Corporation, and its
Line length is 3,800 km (2,400 mi). SGR is part of Kenya‟s Vision 2030, the country‟s development program from
2008 to 2030 whose objective is to transform Kenya into a “newly industrialized, middle-income country providing
all its citizens with a high quality of life in a clean and secure environment by 2030” (Ministry of State for Planning,
2008).
While this article concerns Kenya‟s Standard Gauge Railway transport operations, a recent phenomenon, Kenya‟s
rail transport system dates back to colonial times. Railways were particularly favored because they facilitated the
penetration of remote areas and proved incredibly efficient and economically beneficial to the colonial project (Njoh,
2012). Until recently, Kenya was fully served by the Mombasa-Uganda rail system, developed by the colonial
government in the early 1890s. However, over the years, the rail system has dilapidated due to technological and
maintenance challenges becoming almost obsolete (Githaiga, Burimaso, Bing, & Ahmed, 2019; Mairura, 2010;
Mustapha & Greenhill, 2017). As a result, roads have been used as the primary mode of transport in Kenya.
However, road transport has had significant problems, especially in urban areas and cities, such as traffic congestion
and increased death rates. In a study carried out in Nairobi, the traffic forecast showed that the number of cars that
have access to the city every day in 2007 was more than 330,000, which is why it is necessary to reconsider the
revitalization of the railway as an alternative means of transport (Committee, 2018). Furthermore, the United Nations
considers the rail mode of transport to be the most efficient and efficient in the movement of bulk freight over long
distances on land in Africa and the movement of container traffic between cities and capitals. In Africa, however,
only one percent of the world‟s rail passengers and only two percent of goods are transported by rail due to low
connectivity on the continent (United Nations, 2009).
Therefore, the research set out to examine the successes and challenges of this new standard gauge railway on
transport operations compared to the still existing colonial railway system‟s performance in Kenya. The article
focused on the users‟ experiences and sought ways to address the old hurdles to meet the current challenges. The
Chinese funded SGR has often been lauded as a great success in improving transport operations in Kenya. However,
very few researchers have ventured to provide empirical evidence for this claim. Most of the current research and
narratives on the Mombasa-Nairobi SGR impacts are limited in scope and polarized on the project‟s economic
viability, debt rise, and self-sufficiency. Besides, little is known about the socio-economic impacts of this type of
infrastructure (SGR) given that it is a bit recent in Africa, and the aim of the study is to fill this knowledge gap. For
instance, Voskamp (2017) research entitled „Investing in Transport Infrastructure in Developing Countries‟ was done
before the completion of the SGR and heavily relied on secondary data (Voskamp, 2017). In their research entitled
“Influence of Technology Strategies on the Performance of Standard Gauge Railways in Kenya,” Jincheng focused
on the technological aspect of the project (Jincheng, 2018) while (Githaiga & Bing, 2019) focused on the overall
socio-economic impact of the SGR using secondary data.
Therefore, this study sought to examine three main objectives; the SGR contribution to improving transports
operations for users, the main challenges/concerns faced by SGR users, and the recommendations in improving the
SGR operations. Understanding the successes and challenges of the SGR in Kenya‟s transport operations provides
vital lessons for future infrastructure investment planning for Kenya and other African countries in general.
2. Literature Review
This section focused on the literature on three specific themes covered under transport operations, i.e., travel time
and cost, safety and security, and mobility and accessibility. Travel time and cost savings are essential factors in
passenger transportation‟s social and economic performance (Lingaitis & Sinkevičius, 2014). Transport
infrastructure improvements are linked to consistent and organized traffic timetables, rail traffic acceleration, and
traffic information distribution. This minimizes travel and freight transportation time (Affuso, Masson, & Newbery,
2003; Ajayi, 2005; Givoni, 2006). Research reveals that commuting times for passengers are significantly shorter in
areas along the rail line than in those without the rail line. This is due to the faster speed of rail travel than other
modes of transport, such as cars in comparable circumstances (Baum-Snow & Kahn, 2005). Railway transport has
been argued to provide the most cost-effective option for transporting people and non-time-sensitive freight over
longer distances in Sub-Saharan Africa(Havenga, Simpson, & Bod, 2014) as seen from the Ethiopia-Djibouti
Railway (Quarters, 2018), Ghana railway (Jedwab, Kerby, & Moradi, 2017) and Kenya-Uganda railway (Kerby,
Moradi, & Jedwab, 2018; Rodney, 1982). Modern transport and freight delivery networks globally need efficient,
prompt, and cost-effective services; goods should be shipped from origin to destination at the lowest possible cost
(Ubogu, 2011). These positive results directly boost economic growth in these regions due to improved market
attraction; time and cost savings are the prerequisites for fostering business competitiveness for business consumers
and a direct economic gain (Regional Development, 2014). Generally, transporting freight on railways is less costly
than on roads since cargo transport on roads leads to high costs in vehicle operations, maintenance, and repair on
roads and their users. If the situation persists, it will likely result in increased in-vehicle vibrations, resulting in cargo
damage. In addition, the depreciation of road quality leads to an increase in road freight tariffs, which translates into
an increase in commodity prices (Research, 2013). Railway transports large volumes of cargo, which leads to
removal of the same from the roads leading to a reduction in road damage and carbon emissions. Therefore, railway
transport has been hailed as the best transportation mode for bulky goods due to its greater regularity, capacity, and
energy efficiency than other modes (AFrica Development Bank 2015).
Studies on the safety and security effects of rail transport indicate that it is important to reduce traffic accident rates
since traffic accidents impart social and economic costs to communities globally (Retallack & Ostendorf, 2019).
Although traffic congestion is considered less dangerous than drunk driving, it is significant in causing car accidents.
The increased number of drivers, coupled with fewer roads, leads to congestion due to more drivers sharing less
space. This road congestion, coupled with unsafe driving, could lead to a significant increase in car accidents.
Studies have shown that rail transport is linked to fewer road accidents than other alternative modes of transport and,
therefore, to a safer transport mode (Arndt et al., 2009). As the rail mileage expands in a city, truck congestion and
motorist costs decrease (Winston & Langer, 2004). For example, based on travel estimates for 2065, the Hume
Region of Australia estimated a reduction of $12.6 million per year in road accidents due to railway developments
(Regional Development, 2014). Using the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) accident data, (Litman, 2006)
indicated that as annual per capita transit passenger-miles increased in the US, fatality rates decreased. Besides, rail
transport can lead to a significant reduction in road casualties and related costs. According to the African
Development Bank (2015), the rail accident value is 50 times lower than that of the roads (AFrica Development
Bank 2015). The rail schedule‟s fixed nature has been shown to increase pedestrian and passenger safety due to its
predictable travel path and high visibility (Feigenbaum, 2013; Litman, 2019). This implies that rail systems reduce
congestion and its associated costs; incremental rise in rail service leads to about eight times more shifts to travel for
commute reasons than the same gradual increase in bus service (Litman, 2019). However, in another school of
thought, some studies have criticized rail transit investments, arguing that they are not cost-effective in reducing
traffic congestion. Investments in public transit are unlikely to significantly and meaningfully reduce
congestion(Taylor, 2004). Therefore, despite the rail transport existence, the congestion levels are likely to keep
increasing into the future due to an increase in population and a gradual increase in real wealth and preference
changes (Stopher, 2004). Generally, however, rail transport is critical in reducing traffic congestion on the roads and
reducing accidents, thus enhancing transport safety.
Finally, mobility is considered one of the essential characteristics of human activities since it helps to meet the basic
need of moving from one location to another for commodities and travelers. Mobility enhances cultural, social,
economic, and political activities regardless of their goal. Regions with better mobility have a better chance of
developing than those with limited mobility. Therefore, it is one of the development indicators; better mobility is a
driving force for development, while limited mobility hinders development (Feigenbaum, 2013). Mobility provision
is a sector that provides services to its clients, creates employment as well as providing revenue from taxes, among
others. Railway transport can provide a solution to accessibility by creating a better alternative to other modes of
transport or a new economic corridor with high inter-regional accessibility. The primary assumption is that regions
and cities linked to rail transport are transformed into extended functional areas by substantially increasing the travel
intensity resulting in increased economic growth and development as a result of stimulation and market expansion in
the region (Blum, Haynes, & Karlsson, 1997). Improving the accessibility and connectivity of the various regions
using trains makes it easier to travel, attracts more people to use rail transport (mobility), and thus makes rail
transport more economically viable (Banister & Berechman, 2001; Blanquart & Koning, 2017; Guirao & Soler, 2008;
Shin, 2005). Investment in rail transport infrastructure improves accessibility, which, as a result, contributes to the
potential growth of economic activity, which is mainly due to job creation and increased productivity (Banister &
Berechman, 2001; Guirao & Soler, 2008; Hadas & Ceder, 2010). Different regions‟ connectivity affects their
competitiveness; regions compete for people‟s attraction, settlement, and business investors (Mishra, Welch, & Jha,
2012). In today‟s global markets, industries need to have strong ties to compete effectively internationally. The
extent of global connectivity could have an impact on investment decisions for local and international industries.
Generally, people and investors are more likely to settle in areas with better rail links. As a result of better links
attracting businesses and relocations, there may be agglomeration impacts, leading to higher productivity in the
regions concerned.
3. Theoretical and Conceptual Framework
3.1 Modernization Theory
This study was guided by the modernization theory. The modernization theory began in the 1950s to explain how
Western Europe and North American societies developed (Hussain & Tribe, 1981; Lenin, 1964). The theory posits
that communication and transportation become progressively sophisticated and accessible through the modernization
process as society becomes more mobile and urbanized. Modernism has often been used to justify the
implementation of certain types of structures and processes in underdeveloped regions in comparison with western
civilizations, which are considered to possess unmatched democratic stability and economic prosperity; achieved
through advancement in science and transport, technological progress and rationality, mobility and economic
well-being (Tipps, 1973).
Theoretically, the relationship between transport infrastructure and modern development appears to be evident in
developing countries. In Africa, the colonial and pre-colonial powers seemed to be aware of transport and modern
development relations and heavily invested in transport infrastructure. Transport infrastructure provides a modern
connectivity condition essential to the movement of people and commodities, particularly in a developing space
economy (Herbst, 2000). Modern economies are after means of transport that increase the mobility of people and the
movement of goods at the lowest possible cost, in addition to safer conditions and maximum environmental
protection. As a result, rail has been given priority as an alternative means of transport for the reasons set out above.
By applying the modernization theory, the researcher explores the SGR contribution to the transformation and
modernization of Kenya‟s transport operations for users. Improved user transport operations, increased accessibility
and mobility of people, enhanced service sector, and economic growth are part of a modernized society.
3.2 Conceptual Framework
Generally, investment in rail transport in most developing countries has not been a priority, as shown in the available
literature. Besides, the existing railways have not been assessed in terms of their successes and challenges to
transport operations for the respective countries‟ users. Therefore, every investment model for rail transport must
account for the construction of the project and the impact of the transport operations that come with it. The author
has drawn up a conceptual framework in Figure 1 to illustrate the link between the investment in the standard gauge
rail and its transport operations benefits. The framework sets out the broad relationship between the variables of
specific transport operations covered by this research; time travel and costs, safety and security, mobility, and
accessibility. These relationships underscore a recurring theme in the literature that investment in rail transport can
have multiple overlapping effects on user transport operations. Data on the relationship between rail transport and
rail transport benefits are challenging to obtain in most developing countries.
4. Methodology
This study used a descriptive research design in the form of a survey and adopted a mixed research method
consisting of qualitative and quantitative data. Survey research designs are procedures for quantitative research in
which investigators administer a survey to a sample or to the entire population of individuals to describe attitudes,
opinions, behaviors, or characteristics (Mathiyazhagan & Nandan, 2010). The researcher sought to collect data on the
views of Kenya‟s SGR train users on its operations successes and challenges. The survey design was the most
appropriate method by which the researcher could obtain opinions, attitudes, and suggestions on this subject. It also
provided an appropriate tool for collecting a large amount of data, a practical framework for managing a large
sample of groups, and robust data reliability as opposed to other designs. Data from both primary and secondary
sources were used in this research. The primary sources included observations, questionnaires, and interviews, while
the secondary sources included a review of the relevant literature from relevant journals, books, government
documents, and other necessary documents. Besides, this research used quantitative and qualitative data; quantitative
data was collected through questionnaires and analyzed through SPSS, while qualitative data was collected through
interviews, observation, and analysis of documents.
Given that the main objective was to explore the successes and challenges of the Standard Gauge Railway in
Kenya‟s Transport operations, ordinary train users were the most appropriate target population. They have had
first-hand experience with the SGR. The train users include passengers and freight forwarders. The researcher
focused on Nairobi and Mombasa for freight forwarders. The researcher decided on this population since they have a
better chance of providing credible information based on their SGR services experience.
For the sample size and sampling procedures, the train has a capacity of 1,260 passengers, which formed the target
population of passenger train users. This research used Yamane‟s (1967) sampling formula n =N/(1+Ne2) for the
sample size determination as posited in (Yamane, 1967) where n is the sample size, N is the population size, and „e‟
is the marginal error, for example at 95% level of confidence. From the formula, the sample size for ordinary train
users was calculated as follows:
Sample size for passengers = 1260 / (1 +1260(0.052)) =303
The sample size of the passengers was, therefore, 303 passengers. Simple random sampling was used to select the
train survey respondents. In this method, each member of the sample population has a known and equal chance of
being selected (Kothari, 2004). Twelve freight forwarders were sampled for interviews, both from Nairobi and
Mombasa, for representation purposes, as these are the two main hubs for freight transport. Purposeful sampling was
used to select freight forwarders for interviews. Purpose sampling is argued to be appropriate when sampling for
proportionality is not critical (Trochim, Donnelly, & Arora, 2015). Before filling out the questionnaires or being
interviewed, the respondents gave their oral consent. The data collected was analyzed using SPSS software,
descriptive statistics. The findings were presented in the form of reports, tables, and figures. The data collected was
checked for any errors that were corrected at the data analysis stage prior to the actual data analysis. Quantitative
data from the questionnaire were encoded and entered on the computer for the computation of descriptive statistics.
Descriptive analysis was carried out, which, as (Kothari, 2004) suggests, is an analysis of distributions of one
variable, which provides profiles of groups, individuals, and other subjects on any of the multiple characteristics,
such as size, frequency, preferences, and efficiency. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) was used to
run descriptive analyses to generate frequency distribution and percentages. Tables and graphs were used to
summarize the data while qualitative data from interviews were categorized into research objectives and reported in
narrative form and quantitative presentation. Qualitative data was used to reinforce quantitative data.
5. Results & Discussion
5.1 Response Rate and Demographic Information
Out of the 303 questionnaires distributed to SGR passenger users, 289 were found complete and valid for analysis
representing a 95% response rate. All the twelve cargo transporters were interviewed; eight males and four females.
The average response rate for all the respondents was found to be 95.6%. The high response rate indicated that the
data collected was sufficient to carry out the study (Field, 2005). The questionnaire respondents in this research were
determined through simple random sampling. Considering that all population members had an equal chance of being
selected, the data collected was unbiased. The quantitative results presented here include those collected from the
respondents using questionnaires, while qualitative results were obtained from interviews and questionnaire
open-ended questions.
As Table 1 shows, there were no significant gender issues for SGR use as there was a small gender disparity in the
rate of turnout; male respondents were 58.1%, while 49.1% were female. On age, there was a disproportionately
large number of young people using the SGR, particularly in the age group between 18-30 and 30-40 years of age, at
50.9% and 38.8% respectively, representing 89.7% of the total passenger respondents. 41-50 years and over 51 years
averaged 8.7% and 1.7%, respectively. The majority of travelers used the SGR for 2-5 times at 58%, while those
who used it for more than 5 times followed at 29%, and the least were those who used it once at 13%.
Figure 2 shows that the most potent factor influencing the travelers‟ choice of the train as opposed to other means
was speed/time at 86.3 %. Safety was the second most potent factor at 83.2 %. Punctuality was the third factor as to
why travelers chose the SGR to travel at 60.6 %. Reliability followed closely at 58.1 %. Reduced traffic came in as
the fifth reason at 49.8 %. The cost of travel using the SGR was not a significant factor as the results indicated that
only 36.3 % chose it as a reason for their choice of SGR use. „Other reasons‟ came in as the last factor at 5.2 %.
90
80 Speed/time
70
safety
60
Percentage
Puntuality
50
40 Reliability
30 Reduced traffic
20 Cheap fare
10 Others
0
Reasons
.
Figure 2. Reasons for choosing SGR
mean was far below 2.5 on a five-point Likert scale. Additionally, most of the items displayed a small deviation from
the mean, indicating that the data was homogeneous.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics for the individual construct variables under transport operations
Variable N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
Time and Cost
SGR faster to travel than road 289 1 5 1.74 .734
SGR cheaper to travel 289 1 5 1.96 .920
Sgr faster in goods transport 289 1 5 1.79 .679
SGR increased the transport capacity of goods and289 1 5 1.86 .792
services
Table 3. Descriptive statistics for mean rate scores for the construct variables under transport operations
N Mean Std. Deviation
Time 289 1.7647 .51875
Cost 289 1.96 .920
Safety &Security 289 1.8331 .42026
Mobility& Accessibility 289 1.7751 .54448
Valid N (listwise) 289
reached by (Litman, 2006; Winston & Langer, 2004), indicating that as the rail‟s mileage expands in a city, truck
congestion and motorist costs decrease, increasing road safety and security. Several studies have also shown that rail
transport is associated with fewer road accidents than alternative modes of transport (Litman, 2006). In Kenya, the
SGR has been very significant in reducing traffic congestion, accidents, and related costs along the
Mombasa-Nairobi highway by reducing freight trucks and buses on the roads. Transportation of freight and people
by rail has enhanced overall transport safety and security for goods and services.
Furthermore, there has not yet been a documented major accident of the train wagons on the SGR, further reinforcing
the SGR‟s safety thesis. It has been argued that the cost of accidents is 50 times lower for rail than for road transport,
according to the African Development Bank report (2015), and in the event of train accidents, the damage may not
be as severe compared to other means of transport. Data from the US Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) for
both passenger rail and rail freight from 1998 to 2007 show that train accidents resulted in a single death and 98
injuries, while road-rail grade-crossing accidents resulted in 45 fatalities and 172 injuries (Ortiz, Weatherford,
Greenberg, & Ecola, 2008). Transport of hazardous freight to the SGR could also improve transport safety,
particularly on the roads. As far as safety in freight transport is concerned, the transport of hazardous materials
(flammable liquids, gases, and corrosive materials) is critical, and research has confirmed the large-scale damage
caused by accidental or deliberate release of hazardous substances. Rail is therefore preferred when it comes to
transporting these, and it increases road safety and, in the event of an accident, effective emergency response can
significantly reduce the scale of human consequences on the rail, unlike on roads (Ortiz et al., 2008). As a result, the
rail sector is believed to experience minimal accidents, and most rail accidents do not result in significant direct
damage to equipment, track, and infrastructure. Thousands of road accidents are reported every year in Kenya, along
the Nairobi-Mombasa highway, the main route for trucks transporting freight from Mombasa to other parts of the
country and the region. The African Development Bank (AfDB) estimates that road traffic accidents in developing
countries could be as severe as AIDS deaths by 2030 (AFrica Development Bank 2015). Therefore, developing mass
transit systems could reduce these costs by moving from road to rail, and the SGR has played a significant role in
enhancing transport safety and security.
5.2.3 Mobility and Accessibility
The majority of the passenger respondents agreed that the SGR has generally enhanced mobility and accessibility
with an aggregate mean of 1.77. This was further demonstrated by individual means. For instance, it is now easier to
access more areas along the Mombasa/ Nairobi route than before (mean=1.62), the train is easily accessible
(mean=1.78), and there are available means of transport to and from the stations (mean=1.72). However, the majority
noted that it was not convenient to get to and from the main terminal (Mombasa and Nairobi terminals) (mean=3.62
and were not satisfied with the number of stations (mean=3.52).
The results suggest that the SGR has increased mobility and accessibility between Nairobi and Mombasa as it is now
easier to access more areas along Mombasa/Nairobi than before. Overall, these findings are consistent with the
research findings reported by (Shin, 2005) which argued that improving the accessibility and connectivity of the
various regions using trains provides greater convenience for travel, attracts more people to use rail transport
(mobility), and thus makes rail transport more economically viable. Irrespective of its objective, mobility enhances
cultural, social, economic, and political activities. Regions with better mobility are more likely to develop than those
with limited mobility; therefore, it is one of the indicators of development, improving the efficiency of labor
interactions while reducing the cost of distribution due to the resulting competitive gains (Feigenbaum, 2013). SGR
has created a better transport alternative, thus addressing accessibility challenges between Nairobi and Mombasa. It
has also encouraged the creation of a new economic corridor with high inter-regional accessibility.
5.3 Challenges and Concerns
This was an open-ended question in the questionnaire where the respondents were supposed to note any concerns
they had with the passenger services. At the same time, it was an interview question to the cargo transporters. As
shown in figure 3, the most salient concerns for passengers were on ticketing at 86% and „first mile and last-mile‟
mobility and accessibility challenges at 89%, while for cargo transporters, it was the administrative and logistical
challenges at the Nairobi ICD at 93% and the loss of income for cargo freighters and truck owners at 96%.
Challenges &Concerns
96
94
Percentage
92
90
88
86
84
82
80
6. Conclusion
The aim of this research was to explore the successes and challenges of the SGR in transport operations for users in
Kenya. The research also examined users‟ concerns and attempted to verify whether the available literature was
consistent with what was observable on the ground. This is very important in filling the gap of the hitherto missing
empirical research and contributing to the current discussions on the impact of the SGR on Kenya‟s transport
operations, particularly from users‟ point of view. This is necessary because Kenya‟s colonial rail system has been
constrained in many ways, leading to the systematic destruction of the road network, increased road accidents, and
the loss of regional and international trade opportunities, among others. This pressure on existing infrastructure
support has resulted in challenges for the country‟s transport sector and economic development in general.
The findings of this research show that the SGR has significantly improved transport operations for users in Kenya.
In general, the SGR has enhanced passenger and freight transport operations through reduced travel time, improved
transport safety and security, as well as improved mobility and accessibility. Although travel costs for passengers
have been reduced, the cost of freight transport remains relatively high. The SGR has eased vehicle pressure on the
country‟s road network since most freight is transported by rail, thus enhancing traffic and inter-relationship between
the significant economic strongholds in Kenya. This means reduced congestion, reduced risk of road accidents and,
most importantly, reduced road maintenance costs, mostly on the Mombasa-Nairobi highway, which has traditionally
had serious traffic jams from trucks and other vehicles. Modern economies are after transport that enhances people‟s
mobility and freight movement at the lowest possible cost, alongside safer conditions.
Improvement of physical transport infrastructure and connectivity is significant; however, current and potential
challenges need to be addressed. Although the SGR has provided an alternative for freight and passenger transport
between Mombasa and Nairobi, the high cost of transporting goods due to additional charges, logistical and
administrative challenges for transporters, ticketing challenges and “First and Last Mile” accessibility challenges for
passengers, need to be addressed. It should be noted that the cargo owners are interested in the lowest total cost of
freight and the shortest turnaround time of the cargo. The Nairobi Internal Container Depot‟s logistical challenges
need to be addressed by the relevant government agencies to realize the full potential of the SGR for freight transport.
Transfer of cargo clearance and forwarding documents must be carried out effectively from Mombasa to Nairobi by
integrating the Kenya Ports Authority‟s systems, the Kenya Revenue Authority and the SGR into effective and
efficient real-time 24hours systems. Also, stakeholders should approximate global benchmarks in reducing the time
from loaded trucks to ICD yards. Besides, security improvements could improve the productivity of the ICD for
24-hour operations. There is also a clear need for a readily available transport link between the railway and the two
major cities to solve the “first mile” and “last mile” transport challenges for passengers. Also, an efficient ticketing
system is a core in railway operations. Thus, there is a need to audit the system to identify the cartels that engage in
ticketing malpractices and punitive sanctions taken against them. Besides, the government and relevant stakeholders
could develop policies to ensure healthy competition and a sustainable environment for freight transport stakeholders
and strategies to enhance sustainable employment opportunities. Such policies could include creating special
economic zones and other potential industrial parks for a sustainable environment for all stakeholders. Strong
industrial links and competitive industrial sectors are built up with efficient and reliable transport infrastructure.
Kenya‟s economic take-off cannot be achieved without the development of infrastructure. This includes modern
technology and efficient means of transport for cargo and passengers such as the SGR. Further, freight and passenger
transport are at the center of sustainable socio-economic development as it enhances economic growth, improves
access and connects societies, promotes trade, and aids in poverty alleviation. Safe, secure, affordable,
energy-efficient, reliable, environmentally friendly and regulated freight and passenger transport contribute to
economically efficient, environmentally sound and socially equitable development. In conclusion, the SGR is a
transformative infrastructure project for Kenya, symbolizing the country‟s urgent need to transform itself into a
middle-income economy supported by modern infrastructure.
References
Affuso, L., Masson, J., & Newbery, D. (2003). Comparing investments in new transport infrastructure, roads versus
railways. Journal of Fiscal Studies, 24(3), 275-315.
AFrica Development Bank. (2015). Rail infrastructure in africa: financing policy options. Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire:
AFrica Development Bank: Transport, Urban Development & ICT Department.
Ajayi, J. O. A. (2005). The effects of rail transport on socio-economic growth of Nigeria. Master Thesis.
Arndt, J. C., Morgan, C., Overman, J. H., Clower, T. L., Weinstein, B. L., & Seman, M. (2009). Transportation,
social and economic impacts of light and commuter rail. Technical Report, Texas Transportation Institute,
Report 0-5652-1.
Banister, D., & Berechman, J. (2001). Transport investment and the promotion of economic growth. Journal of
Transport Geography, 9, 209-218.
Baum-Snow, N., & Kahn, M. E. (2005). Effects of urban rail transit expansions: evidence from sixteen cities,
1970-2000. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs.
Blancas, L. C., Isbell, J., Isbell, M., Tan, H. J., & Tao, W. (2013). Efficient logistics; a key to vietnam’s
competitiveness: the world bank.
Blanquart, C., & Koning, M. (2017). The local economic impacts of high-speed railways: theories and facts.
European Transport Research Review, 9(2). [Link]
Blum, U., Haynes, K. E., & Karlsson, C. (1997). The regional and urban effects of high-speed trains. The Annals of
Regional Science, 31, 1-20.
Committee, J. T. (2018). Report of the joint technical committee on the improvement of efficiency and cost
effectiveness of transportation of cargo using SGR.
Feigenbaum, B. (2013). High-speed rail in europe and Asia: lessons for the united States. Policy Study 418.
Githaiga, N. M., & Bing, W. (2019). Belt and road initiative in Africa: the impact of standard gauge railway in
Kenya. China Report, 55(3), 219-240. [Link]
Githaiga, N. M., Burimaso, A., Bing, W., & Ahmed, S. M. (2019). The belt and road initiative: opportunities and
risks for Africa‟s connectivity. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 5(1), 117-141.
Givoni, M. (2006). Development and impact of the modern high-speed train: a review. Transport Reviews Journal,
26(5), 593-611.
Guirao, B., & Soler, F. (2008). Impacts of the new high speed rail services on small tourist cities: the case of Toledo
(Spain). WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 117.
Hadas, Y., & Ceder, A. (2010). Public Transit Network Connectivity. Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
Havenga, J. H., Simpson, Z. P., & Bod, A. D. (2014). South Africa‟s freight. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain,
8(1).
Herbst, J. (2000). States and power in Africa: comparative lessons in authority and control. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press.
Hussain, A., & Tribe, K. (1981). Marxism and the agrarian question, german social democracy and the peasantry,
1890-1907.
Jedwab, R., Kerby, E., & Moradi, A. (2017). History, path dependence and development: evidence from colonial
railroads, settlers and cities in Kenya. The Economic Journal, 127(603), 1467-1494.
Jincheng, L. (2018). Influence of technological strategies on performance of standard gauge railway in Kenya.
Masters of Business Administration, University of Nairobi, University of Nairobi.
Kazungu, S. (2018). Nairobi ICD capacity overstretched, says Kifwa. Business Daily Africa. Retrieved from
[Link]
2jum/[Link]
Kerby, E., Moradi, A., & Jedwab, R. (2018). 3 policy lessons from Africa’s colonial railways. Retrieved from
[Link]
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology; methods and techniques. India: New Age International (P) Ltd,
Publishers.
Kumar, A. (2014). Freight logistics and intermodal transport implications for competitiveness (Vol. 175). New
Delhi: Institute for Studies in Industrial Development.
Lenin, V. I. (1964). The development of capitalism in russia; the process of the formation of a home market for
large-scale industry. Progress Publishers.
Lingaitis, V., & Sinkevičius, G. (2014). Passenger Transport by Railway: Evaluation of Economic and Social
Phenomenon. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 549-559.
[Link]
Litman, T. (2006). Comprehensive evaluation of rail transit benefits. Journal of Transport Policy.
Litman, T. (2019). Evaluating public transit benefits and costs; best practices guidebook. Victoria Transport Policy
Institute: Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
Mairura, O. (2010). Nairobi - emerging metropolitan region: development planning and management opportunities
and challenges. Nairobi Metropolitan Region: 46th ISOCARP Congress 2010.
Mathiyazhagan, T., & Nandan, D. (2010). Survey research method. Media Mimansa.
Ministry of State for Planning, N. D. A. V. (2008, June). Launching of Kenya vision 2030 speech by his excellency
hon. Mwai Kibaki, CGH, MP. Retrieved from
[Link]
-by-his-excellency-hon-mwai-kibaki-cgh-mp&catid=56%3Aothers&Itemid=96
Mishra, S., Welch, T. F., & Jha, M. K. (2012). Performance indicators for public transit connectivity in multi-modal
transportation networks, National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education. University of Maryland,
United States University of Maryland.
Muchira, N. (2019). Kenya: Cargo pile-up in nairobi as agencies clamp down on tax evasion, fake goods. The East
African. Retrieved from [Link]
Mustapha, S., & Greenhill, R. (2017). An ‘age of choice’ for infrastructure financing? Evidence from Kenya. London:
Overseas Development Institute.
Mutua, J. (2019). MPs summon Macharia over order on SGR cargo. Business Daily. Retrieved from
[Link]
57612-eejjw8z/[Link]
Njoh, A. J. (2012). Impact of transportation infrastructure on development in east Africa and the Indian ocean region.
Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 138(1), 1-9. [Link]
Ogolla, K., Rucha, K., Aroni, J., & Ndua, G. (2019). Report on the socio economic impact of the sgr on the port city
of Mombasa. Nairobi: School of Business, University of Nairobi.
Ortiz, D. S., Weatherford, B. A., Greenberg, M. D., & Ecola, L. (2008). Improving the safety and security of freight
and passenger rail in pennsylvania: RAND Corporation.
Quarters, A. (2018). Ethiopia lauds economic impact of China-built Ethiopia-Djibouti railway. African Quarters.
Regional Development. (2014). High speed rail economic and social benefits for the hume region. Deloitte Access
Economics Pty Ltd.
Research, C. F. S. A. I. (2013). 10th annual state of logistics survey for South Africa.
Retallack, A. E., & Ostendorf, B. (2019). Current understanding of the effects of congestion on traffic accidents.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(18).
Rodney, W. (1982). How Europe underdeveloped Africa. Howard University Press.
Shin, D. (2005). Recent experience of and prospects for high-speed rail in Korea: implications of a transport system
and regional development from a global perspective California HSR Series, Working paper 2005-02. Berkeley:
University of California.
Stopher, P. R. (2004). Reducing road congestion, a reality check. Transport Policy, 11(2), 117-131.
Taylor, B. D. (2004). The politics of congestion mitigation. Journal of Transport Policy, 11(3), 299-302.
Tipps, D. C. (1973). Modernization theory and the comparative study of societies: a critical perspective.
Comparative Studies in Society and History, 15(2), 199-226.
Trochim, W., Donnelly, J., & Arora, K. (2015). Research methods: the essential knowledge base (2nd ed.). Boston:
Nelson Education, Cengage Learning.
Ubogu, A. E. (2011). The potentials of rail-road integration for port-hinterland freight transport In Nigeria.
International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering, 1(2), 89-107.
UNIFE, T. E. R. I. (2014). Megatrucks versus rail freight?. Germany: The Voice of European Railways.
United Nations, U. (2009). The transport situation in africa: economic and social council, economic commission for
Africa. Sixth Session of the Committee Trade Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Vierth, I., Berell, H., McDaniel, J., Haraldsson, M., Hammarström, U., Yahya, M.-R., … Björketun, U. (2008). The
effects of long and heavy trucks on the transport system. Sweden: Ministry of Enterprise, Energy and
Communications.
Voskamp, R. (2017). Investing in Transport Infrastructure in Developing Countries. International Bachelor of
Economics and Business Economics (IBEB); Urban, Port and Transport Economics, Eramus Universiteit,
Rotterdam.
Winston, C., & Langer, A. (2004). The effect of government highway spending on road users’ congestion costs.
Report, Federal Highway Administration.
Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: an introductory analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
Zhao, Y., Zhang, D., & Li, J. (2019). Research on risk assessment technology of China's railway ticket selling and
reservation system. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1325.
[Link]
Copyrights
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
license ([Link]
Kenya can optimize the SGR by enhancing e-ticketing to curb hoarding, expanding service to reduce 'first mile' and 'last mile' accessibility issues, and improving logistical efficiency at logistics centers like Nairobi ICD . Strengthening regulatory frameworks and policies that foster fair competition and infrastructure efficiency are essential. Increasing train frequency and better integrating city public transportation with SGR terminals will also help maximize economic returns and service efficiency .
The SGR has substantially increased mobility and accessibility between Nairobi and Mombasa, initiating a new economic corridor. This facilitates greater regional development by improving connectivity, reducing distribution costs, and supporting competitive economic gains, contributing to Kenya’s goal of Middle-income status . The infrastructure has fostered the creation of special economic zones for sustainable stakeholder environments, thereby boosting trade and economic vibrance .
The SGR facilitates greater regional connectivity and mobility, potentially fostering socio-political cohesion and economic integration across communities between Nairobi and Mombasa. This integration supports regional development by improving labor efficiency, cultural interactions, and access to resources, which are vital for comprehensive national growth . Increased accessibility encourages equitable development and can reduce regional disparities, promoting socio-political stability .
SGR contributes to socio-economic development by improving connectivity, reducing transport costs, and enhancing competitiveness, which are crucial for economic growth and poverty alleviation . However, gaps such as logistical inefficiencies, ticketing malpractices, and 'last mile' transport challenges must be addressed to solidify these benefits and promote continuous infrastructure-driven growth .
Challenges with the SGR include inefficiencies in the online ticketing system, where tickets appear sold out but are attainable through third parties at inflated prices or directly at stations . The hoarding by agents and deliberate last-minute cancellations create an artificial scarcity. Solutions include auditing the ticketing system to identify cartels and imposing penalties . Transportation accessibility issues involve 'first mile' and 'last mile' difficulties, particularly due to the location of terminals outside the cities, causing additional travel costs and time . It is recommended to extend services to old city centers to improve accessibility .
SGR helps reduce traffic congestion and road accidents, which lowers associated environmental pollution and resource consumption. Railways generally produce fewer emissions per ton of freight than trucks, supporting sustainable and environmentally friendly development goals . Increased rail usage can contribute to reduced carbon footprints compared to road transport, aligning with broader sustainability objectives .
Strategies include auditing the ticketing system to dismantle existing cartels, penalizing those involved in malpractices, revising the ticket cancellation policy to discourage speculative purchases, and possibly limiting access to bulk ticket sales . Implementing robust monitoring systems, increasing transparency, and involving regulatory bodies in oversight would ensure accountability and maintain the integrity of the ticketing process .
The Nairobi ICD faces logistical challenges, including long clearance and verification processes due to uncoordinated services among government agencies and congestion caused by limited storage facilities . These inefficiencies diminish the SGR’s effectiveness in cargo transportation and necessitate streamlining procedures to enhance operational efficiency and reduce delays .
The Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) significantly reduces costs and travel time compared to road transport. The cost for transporting a 20ft container is reduced to US$780 and for a 40ft container to US$1,095/1,170 as opposed to higher costs via road transport. Passenger travel time from Mombasa to Nairobi is reduced by rail from over ten hours by road to approximately five hours, while freight takes less than eight hours by rail as opposed to up to 48 hours by road .
The SGR is considered safer than road transport as it experiences minimal accidents, improving overall transport safety . The railway reduces congestion and accidents along the Mombasa-Nairobi highway by transporting freight and passengers more securely, leading to a safer road environment .