0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views3 pages

Siminar

Uploaded by

abhireddie65
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views3 pages

Siminar

Uploaded by

abhireddie65
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Today, I will explain Article 356 of the Indian Constitution, which deals with state emergencies.

This
article allows the President of India to impose President's Rule in a state when the governance
cannot be carried out according to the Constitution.

What is Article 356?

Article 356 empowers the President of India to impose President's Rule in a state if the President
believes that the governance in that state cannot be carried out in accordance with the Constitution.
This provision is crucial for maintaining constitutional order when a state government faces severe
challenges.

When is Article 356 Invoked?

Article 356 is invoked under several circumstances:

 Political Instability: When a state government loses its majority and cannot govern
effectively.

 Breakdown of Law and Order: Significant unrest that prevents the government from
maintaining order.

 Non-compliance: If the state fails to adhere to constitutional norms.

Distinction from Article 352

It’s important to distinguish Article 356 from Article 352, which allows for a national emergency in
cases of threats to national security, such as war or external aggression. While Article 356 focuses on
governance issues at the state level, Article 352 deals with broader national crises.

Historical Instances

Some notable instances of Article 356 being invoked include:

 Uttar Pradesh (1976): Due to political instability.

 Punjab (1987): In response to severe law and order issues.

 Bihar (2005): Following a breakdown of law and order.

Consequences of State Emergency

When President's Rule is imposed, the state government is suspended, and the central government
takes over administration. This means the President can direct state governance, which disrupts the
democratic process temporarily.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Article 356 is essential for ensuring constitutional governance during crises at the state
level. While it serves to maintain order, it must be used carefully to avoid political misuse.
Understanding this article and its distinction from Article 352 helps clarify the framework of
emergency provisions in India.
Thank you for your attention.

Today I am going to explain Article 356 of the Constitution of India on State of Emergency. This clause
allows the President of India to impose Presidential Rule in a State which cannot be governed
according to the Constitution.

What is Article 356?

Article 356 empowers the President of India to impose Presidential Rules on a State if the President
considers that the State cannot be governed in accordance with the Constitution. This process is
crucial to maintaining the parliamentary process when there are serious challenges to the federal
government.

When does Article 356 apply?

Article 356 applies in several situations:

• Political instability: When a national government loses its majority and cannot govern effectively.

• Disruption of law and order: Massive violence that prevents the government from maintaining
order.

• Non-enforcement: If the state does not comply with constitutional standards.

Distinction between Article 352

It is important to distinguish between Article 356 and Article 352 because it allows for a state of
emergency in cases that threaten national security, such as war or external attack Article 356 focuses
on governance issues of at the national level, while Article 352 deals with nation-wide problems.

Historical context

Some notable examples of the application of Article 356 include:

• Uttar Pradesh (1976): due to political instability.

• Punjab (1987): In response to serious topics of law and order.

• Bihar (2005): After breakdown of law and order.

Emergency Consequences of the State


With a presidential regime, the federal government is suspended and the central government takes
over. This means that the president can direct the nation’s government, temporarily undermining the
democratic process.

conclusion

Conclusion:

You might also like