Aerosol Particle Transport and Dynamics
Aerosol Particle Transport and Dynamics
Goodarz Ahmadi
Department of Mechanical
and Aeronautical Engineering
Clarkson University
Potsdam, NY 13699-5725
1
Air pollution and smog.
2
Sample glass fiber particles.
3
Dust storm over the red sea.
4
Birth place of stars.
5
INTRODUCTION TO AEROSOLS
The range of diameters of common aerosol particles is between 0.01 and 100 µm.
The lower limit of 10 nm roughly corresponds to the transition from molecule to particle.
Particles larger than 100 µm normally do not remain suspended in air for a sufficient
amount of time. Noting that the mean free path for air is about 0.07 µm and visible light
has a wavelength band of 0.4 – 0.7 µm, the mechanical and optical behaviors of particles
are significantly affected by their size.
The important relevant dimensionless groups relevant the motion of aerosols are
listed in Table 2.
6
Table 2 – Dimensionless Groups
Knudsen Number 2λ
Kn =
d
Mach Number | vp − vf |
M=
cf
Schmidt Number ν n f λd 2
Sc = =
D 4
Brown Number v p,2 | v' p |
Br = ( )1 / 2 =
v f ,2 | v'f |
Reynolds Number | v p − v f | d 4M
Re = =
ν Kn
Here superscript " f " corresponds to fluid and superscript " p " denotes particle.
| v'f | = (8kT / πm f )1 / 2
and
ν = 0.5 c f λ
1 kT
λ= =
2πnd 2πd 2m P
2
m
Here n is the gas number density, d m is the gas molecule (collisional) diameter,
k = 1.38 × 10 -23 J/K is the Boltzmann constant, P is pressure, and T is temperature. For
air, d m = 0.361 nm and
23.1T
λ(µm) = , P is in Pa, and T is K.
P
7
Table 3. Aerosol Characteristics
Particle Diameter, µm
−4 −3 −2
10 10 10 10 −1 10 0 101 10 2 10 3 10 4
10 −4 10 −3 10 −2 10 −1 10 0 101 10 2 10 3 10 4
Particle Diameter, µm
8
HYDRODYNAMIC FORCES
F D = 3πµUd, (1)
where d the particle diameter, µ is the coefficient of viscosity and U is the relative
velocity of the fluid with respect to the particle. Equation (1) may be restated as
FD 24
CD = = (2)
1
ρU 2 A Re
2
πd 2
In Equation (3), ρ is the fluid (air) density, A = is cross sectional area of the
4
spherical particle, and
ρUd
Re = (3)
µ
is the Reynolds number. The Stokes drag is applicable to the creeping flow regime
(Stokes regime) with small Reynolds numbers (Re < 0.5). At higher Reynolds numbers,
the flow the drag coefficient deviates from Equation 2. Figure 1 shows the variation of
drag coefficient for a sphere for a range of Reynolds numbers.
Eq. (4)
CD
Eq. (2)
Re
Figure 1. Variations of drag coefficient with Reynolds number for a spherical particle.
9
Oseen included the inertial effect approximately and developed a correction to the
Stokes drag given as
For 1 < Re < 1000, which is referred to as the transition regime, the following
expressions may be used (Clift et al., 1978):
or
24 4
CD = + 0.33 (6)
Re Re
1000
100
Experiment
CD
10 Oseen
0
0 1 10 100 1000 10000
Re
Figure 2. Predictions of various models for drag coefficient for a spherical particle.
10
For 10 3 < Re < 2.5 × 10 5 , the drag coefficient is roughly constant ( C D = 0.4 ). This
regime is referred to as the Newton regime. At Re ≈ 2.5 × 10 5 , the drag coefficient
decreases sharply due to the transient from laminar to turbulent boundary layer around
the sphere. That causes the separation point to shift downstream as shown in Figure 3.
For a particle moving near a wall, the drag force varies with distance of the
particle from the surface. Brenner (1961) analyzed the drag acting on a particle moving
toward a wall under the creeping flow condition as shown in Figure 4a. To the first
order, the drag coefficient is given as
24 d
CD = (1 + ) (7)
Re 2h
d U
d
h h
U
(a) Motion normal to the wall (b) Motion parallel to the wall
For a particle moving parallel to the wall as shown in Figure 4b, the Stokes drag
force need to be modifies. For large distances from the wall, Faxon (1923) found
24 9 d 1 d 45 d 4 1 d 5 −1
CD = [1 − ( ) + ( ) 3 − ( ) − ( ) ] (8)
Re 16 2h 8 2h 256 2h 16 2h
11
Cunningham Correction Factor
For very small particles, when the particle size becomes comparable with the gas
mean free path, slip occurs and the expression for drag must be modified accordingly.
Cunningham obtained the needed correction to the Stokes drag force:
3πµUd
FD = , (9)
Cc
2λ
Cc = 1 + [1.257 + 0.4e −1.1d / 2 λ ] (10)
d
Here λ denotes the molecular mean free path in the gas. Note that C c > 1 for all values
of d and λ. Figure 5 shows the variation of Cunningham correction factor with Knudsen
number. It is seen that C c is about 1 for Kn <0.1 and increases sharply as Kn increases
beyond 0.5. Table 4 illustrates the variation of Cunningham correction factor with
particle diameter in air under normal pressure and temperature conditions with λ = 0.07
λ
µm. Equation (10) is applicable to a wide range of Kn = ≤ 1000 that covers slip,
d
transition and part of free molecular flows. The particle Reynolds number and Mach
number (bases on relative velocity), however should be small.
1000
100
Cc
10
1
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Kn
12
Table 4 – Variations of C c with d for λ = 0.07 µm
Diameter, µm Cc
10 µm 1.018
1 µm 1.176
0.1 µm 3.015
0.01 µm 23.775
0.001 µm 232.54
Compressibility Effect
For high-speed flows with high Mach number, the compressibility could affect the
drag coefficient. Many expressions were suggested in the literature to account for the
effect of gas Mach number on the drag force. Henderson (1976) suggested two
expressions for drag force acting on spherical particles for subsonic and supersonic flows.
−1
Re
CD = 24Re+ S 4.33 + 1.567× exp − 0.247
S
+ exp −
(
0.5M 4.5 + 0.38 0.03Re+ 0.48 Re ) M
+ 0.1M 2 + 0.2M 8 + 1 − exp − 0.6S
Re 1 + 0.03Re+ 0.48 Re Re
(11)
the molecular speed ratio, where γ is the specific heat ratio. For the supersonic flows
with Mach numbers equal to or exceeding 1.75, the drag force is given by
1
0.34 M 2 2 1.058 1
0.9 + 2 + 1.86 2 + 2 + − 4
M Re S S S
CD = 1
(12)
M 2
1 + 1.86
Re
For the flow regimes with Mach between 1 and 1.75, a linear interpolation is to be used.
13
Carlson and Hoglund (1964) proposed the following expression:
0.427 3
1 + exp(− − 0.88 }
24 M 4.63
Re
CD = (13)
Re M Re
1+ {3.82 + 1.28 exp(−1.25 )}
Re M
Droplets
For drag force for liquid droplets at small Reynolds numbers is given as
1 + 2µ f / 3µ p
FD = 3πµ f Ud (14)
1 + µf / µp
where the superscripts f and p refer to the continuous fluid and discrete particles
(droplets, bubbles), respectively.
Non-spherical Particles
For non-spherical (chains or fibers) particles, Stokes’ drag law must be modified.
i.e.,
FD = 3πµUd e K , (15)
where d e is the diameter of a sphere having the same volume as the chain or fiber. That
is,
6
d e = ( Volume)1 / 3 (16)
π
14
Table 5 – Correction Coefficient
Cluster Correction Cluster Correction Cluster Correction
Shape Shape Shape
oo K = 1.12 oooo K = 1.32 oo K = 1.17
oo
ooo K = 1.27 ooooo K = 1.45 oo K = 1.19
o
oo
o K = 1.16 oooooo K = 1.57 oo K = 1.17
oo oo
oo
oooooo K = 1.64 ooooooo K = 1.73
o
o
Ellipsoidal Particles
For particles that are ellipsoids of revolution, the drag force is given by
FD = 6πµUaK' (17)
For the motion of a prolate ellipsoid along the polar axis as shown in Figure 6a,
b b
a a
(a) (b)
15
4 2
(β − 1)
3 b
K' = (β = ) (18)
( 2β − 1)
2
a
ln[β + (β 2 − 1)1 / 2 ] − β
(β 2 − 1)1 / 2
For the motion of a prolate ellipsoid of revolution transverse to the polar axis, as
shown in Figure 6b
8 2
(β − 1)
3 b
K' = (β = ) (19)
( 2β − 3)
2
a
ln[β + (β 2 − 1)1 / 2 ] + β
(β − 1)
2 1/ 2
Similarly for the motion of an oblate ellipsoid of revolution along the polar axis as
shown in Figure 7a,
4 2
(β − 1)
3 a
K' = (β = ) (20)
β(β − 2)
2
b
tan −1 (β 2 − 1)1 / 2 ] + β
(β − 1)
2 1/ 2
b b
a a
(a) (b)
For the motion of an oblate ellipsoid transverse to the polar axis as shown in Figure 7b,
16
8 2
(β − 1)
3 a
K' = (β = ) (21)
β(3β − 2)
2
b
tan −1 (β 2 − 1)1 / 2 ] − β
(β 2 − 1)1 / 2
By taking the limit as β → ∞ in Equations (17)-(21), the drag force on thin disks
and needles may be obtained. These are:
FD = 16µaU (22)
FD = 32µaU / 3 (23)
a a
(a) (b)
4πµUb b
FD = , (β = ) (24)
ln 2β a
8πµUb
FD = (25)
ln 2β
17
b b
(a) (b)
Cylindrical Needle
For a cylindrical needle with a very large ratio of length to radius ratio, moving
transverse to its axis as shown in Figure 10, the drag per unit length is given as
4πµU
FD = (26)
(2.002 − ln R e )
2aU
where R e = and a is the radius. It is understood that
ν
18
Particle Shape Factor
The ratio of the resistance of a given particle to that of a spherical particle having
the same volume is called the dynamic shape factor of the particle, K. The radius of an
equal volume sphere is referred to as the equivalent radius r e . Clearly
Hence,
K = K ' β1/ 3 for prolate ellipsoids, (29)
The Stokes (sedimentation radius) of a particle is the radius of a sphere with the same
density, which is settling with the terminal velocity of the particle in a quiescent fluid.
Values of shaped factors for a number of particles are available (Hidy, 1984; Lerman,
1979).
19
AEROSOL PARTICLE MOTION
Equation of Motion
du p 3πµd f
m = (u − u p ) + mg (1)
dt Cc
Here u p is the particle velocity, u f is the fluid velocity, g is the acceleration of gravity
and the buoyancy effect in air is neglected. Here it is assume that the particle is away
from walls and the Stokes drag is assumed.
Drag
Gravity
3πµd
Dividing Equation (1) by and rearranging, we find
Cc
du p
τ = (u f − u p ) + τg (2)
dt
where the particle response (relaxation) time is defined as
mC c d 2 ρ p C c Sd 2 C c
τ= = = ,
3πµd 18µ 18ν
(3)
πd 3ρ p
where m = , ν is the kinematic viscosity of the fluid and S = ρ p / ρ f is the density
6
ratio. In practice, for non-Brownian particles, Cc ≈ 1 and
20
d 2ρ p
τ≈ (4)
18µ
Terminal Velocity
u p = (u f + τg)(1 − e − t / τ ) (5)
ρ p d 2 gC c
u t = τg = (6)
18µ
Table 7 – Relaxation time τ for a unit density particle in air (p = 1 atm, T = 20 o C).
Diameter, µm ut = τ g τ sec Stop Distance Stop Distance
u o = 1 m/s u o = 10 m/s
0.05 0.39 µm/s 4 × 10 −8
0.04 µm 4 × 10 −4 mm
0.1 0.93 µm/s 9.15 × 10 −8 0.092 µm 9.15 × 10 −4 mm
0.5 10.1 µm/s 1.03 × 10 −6 1.03 µm 0.0103 mm
1 35 µm/s 3.57 × 10 −6 3.6 µm 0.0357 mm
5 0.77 mm/s 7.86 × 10 −5 78.6 µm 0.786 mm
10 3.03 mm/s 3.09 × 10 −4 309 µm 3.09 mm
50 7.47 cm/s 7.62 × 10 −3 7.62 mm 76.2 mm
Stopping Distance
In the absence of gravity and fluid flow, for a particle with an initial velocity of
p
u , the solution to (2) is given by
o
x p = u po τ(1 − e − t / τ ) (7)
u p = uoe − t / τ (8)
x p = u op τ (9)
21
is known as the stopping distance of the particle. For an initial velocity of 1000 cm/s, the
stop distance for various particles are listed in table 7.
Particle Path
For constant fluid velocity, integrating Equation (5), the position of the particle is
given by
Here x op is the initial position of the particle. For a particle starting from rest, when the
fluid velocity is in x-direction and gravity is in the negative y-direction, Equation (10)
reduces to
x p / u f τ = [ t / τ − (1 − e − t / τ )] (12)
y p / u f τ = −α[ t / τ − (1 − e − t / τ )] (13)
where the ratio of the terminal velocity to the fluid velocity α is given by
τg
α= (14)
uf τ
Figure 2 shows the variation of vertical position of the particle with time.
0
α =0.1
-2
-4
α =1
y/utau
-6
-8
α =2
-10
-12
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
t/tau
Figure 2. Variations of the particle vertical position with time.
22
From Equations (12) and (13), it follows that
y p = − αx p (15)
That is the particle paths are straight lines. Figure 3 shows sample particle trajectories.
0
α =0.1
-2
-4
y/utau
α =1
-6
-8
-10
α =2
-12
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
x/utau
Buoyancy Effects
For small particles in liquids, the buoyancy effect must be included. Thus,
Equation (1) is replaced by
du p 3πµd f
(m + m a ) = (u − u p ) + (m − m f )g (16)
dt Cc
πd 3ρ f
mf = (17)
6
and m a is the apparent mass with ρ f being the fluid density. For spherical particles,
1
ma = mf .
2
23
Keeping the same definition for particle relaxation time as given by (3), Equation
(2) may be restated as
1 du p 1
(1 + )τ = (u f − u p ) + τg(1 − ) (18)
2S dt S
1 ρ p d 2 gC c ρf
u t = τ g (1 − ) = (1 − p ) (18)
S 18µ ρ
Note that the Basset force and the memory effects are neglected in this analysis.
24
Lift Force
du f 1 / 2 du f
FL (Saff ) = 1.615ρν1 / 2 d 2 (u f − u p ) | | sgn( ) (1)
dy dy
Here u f is the fluid velocity at the location of mass center of the particle, u p is the
du f
particle velocity, γ& = is the shear rate, d is the particle diameter and ρ and ν are the
dt
fluid density and viscosity. Note that F L is in the positive y-direction if u f >u p .
Lift
uf up
| uf − up | d Ωd 2
R es = << 1 R eΩ = << 1
ν ν
γ& d 2 R 1eG/ 2
R eG = << 1 ε= >> 1
ν R es
Here Ω is the rotational speed of the sphere. Dandy & Dwyer (1990) found that the
Saffman lift force is approximately valid at larger R es and small ε . McLaughlin (1991)
showed that the lift force decreases as ε decreases. Based on these studies Mei (1992)
suggested the following empirical fit to the results of Dandy and Dwyer and McLaughlin.
For large ε and R es ,
25
FL (1 − 0.3314α1 / 2 ) exp(−R es / 10) + 0.3314α1 / 2 for R es ≤ 40
=
FL (Saff ) 0.0524(αR es )1 / 2 for R es > 40
(2)
where
γ&d R es ε 2 R eG
α= = = (3)
2 | uf − up | 2 2R es
For 0.1 ≤ ε ≤ 20
FL
= 0.3{1 + tanh[2.5 log10 (ε + 0.191)]}{0.667 + tan[6(ε − 0.32)]} (4)
FL (Saff )
Note the change in sign of the lift force for small values of ε .
McLaughlin (1993) included the effects of presence of the wall in his analysis of
the lift force. The results for particles in a shear field but not too close to the wall were
given in tabulated forms. Cherukat and McLaughlin (1994) analyzed the lift force acting
on spherical particles near a wall as shown in Figure 2. Accordingly
FL ( C − L ) = ρV 2 d 2 I L / 4 (6)
where
V = u p − u f = u p − γ& l
26
Lift
d l
Here
d γ& d
K= , ∧G = . (9)
2l 2v
Leighton and Acrivos (1985) obtain the expression for the lift on the spherical
particles resting on a plane substrate as shown in Figure 4. They found
which is always point away from the wall. Note that the Saffman expression given by (1)
may be restated as
27
Lift
+ + u + +yu * u *2
u =y , u = * , y = , γ= (12)
u ν ν
Experimental studies of lift force were performed for generally larger particles in the
range of 100 to several hundred µm. Hall (1988) found
Figure 4 compares the model predictions with the experimental data of Hall. It is seen
that the experimental data is generally much higher than the theoretical models.
28
1.00E+03
1.00E+02 Experiment
1.00E+01 Saffman
Mollinger
1.00E+00
Fl+
1.00E-01
Hall
1.00E-02
1.00E-03
Leighton
1.00E-04
1.00E-05
0.1 1 10
d+
29