0% found this document useful (0 votes)
68 views5 pages

Peer Evaluation for POLS 2119 Project

Nehrbrb

Uploaded by

Harman Sidhu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
68 views5 pages

Peer Evaluation for POLS 2119 Project

Nehrbrb

Uploaded by

Harman Sidhu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Peer Evaluation

POLS 2119

Instructor Michelle Coffin

Group Project Assignment

Topic:
Student Name: Harmanpreet Singh

Identify the team member being evaluated:


[Link] birah(0283277)
[Link] Ezeanyagu (0274422)
[Link] Uloma (0290084)
4. Ahmed Adewale Adekoye (0284431)

[Link] BIRAH(0283277)

Peer Evaluation
Area of contribution #1: Research (research, gathering, evaluating and
citing information)
1 2 3 4 5 4.5/
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
5
Area of contribution #2: Analysis & synthesis (critical analysis of
problem/issues)
1 2 3 4 5 4.5/
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
5
Area of contribution #3: Creativity and innovation (ideas, effective
processes and synthesis)
1 2 3 4 5 5/5
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
Area of contribution #4: Writing (organization of work, reviewing
members’ reports or sections, quality of writing)
1 2 3 4 5 4/5
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
Area of contribution #5: Quality of individual contribution (providing
constructive and relevant feedback, contributing to preparation of the
project, attendance, actively participating in team meetings, assisting
team members, volunteering for tasks, asking early for assistance if
required) 5/5
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement

TOTAL: 23/2
5

[Link] Ezeanyagu(0274422)

Peer Evaluation
Area of contribution #1: Research (research, gathering, evaluating and
citing information)
1 2 3 4 5 4.5/
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
5
Area of contribution #2: Analysis & synthesis (critical analysis of
problem/issues)
1 2 3 4 5 4.5/
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
5
Area of contribution #3: Creativity and innovation (ideas, effective
processes and synthesis)
1 2 3 4 5 5/5
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
Area of contribution #4: Writing (organization of work, reviewing
members’ reports or sections, quality of writing)
1 2 3 4 5 4/5
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
Area of contribution #5: Quality of individual contribution (providing
constructive and relevant feedback, contributing to preparation of the
project, attendance, actively participating in team meetings, assisting
team members, volunteering for tasks, asking early for assistance if
required) 5/5
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
TOTAL: 23/2
5

[Link] Uloma (0290084)

Peer Evaluation
Area of contribution #1: Research (research, gathering, evaluating and
citing information)
1 2 3 4 5 5/5
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
Area of contribution #2: Analysis & synthesis (critical analysis of
problem/issues)
1 2 3 4 5 4.5/
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
5
Area of contribution #3: Creativity and innovation (ideas, effective
processes and synthesis)
1 2 3 4 5 5/5
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
Area of contribution #4: Writing (organization of work, reviewing
members’ reports or sections, quality of writing)
1 2 3 4 5 3.5/
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
5
Area of contribution #5: Quality of individual contribution (providing
constructive and relevant feedback, contributing to preparation of the
project, attendance, actively participating in team meetings, assisting
team members, volunteering for tasks, asking early for assistance if
required) 5/5
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement

TOTAL: 23/2
5
4. Ahmed Adewale Adekoye (0284431)

Peer Evaluation
Area of contribution #1: Research (research, gathering, evaluating and
citing information)
1 2 3 4 5 4.5/
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
5
Area of contribution #2: Analysis & synthesis (critical analysis of
problem/issues)
1 2 3 4 5 4.5/
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
5
Area of contribution #3: Creativity and innovation (ideas, effective
processes and synthesis)
1 2 3 4 5 5/5
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
Area of contribution #4: Writing (organization of work, reviewing
members’ reports or sections, quality of writing)
1 2 3 4 5 5/5
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement
Area of contribution #5: Quality of individual contribution (providing
constructive and relevant feedback, contributing to preparation of the
project, attendance, actively participating in team meetings, assisting
team members, volunteering for tasks, asking early for assistance if
required) 5/5
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Below Area for Good Very good
expectations improvement

TOTAL: 24/2
5

You might also like