Financing Decisions and Leverages Analysis
Financing Decisions and Leverages Analysis
Solution 1:
Income Statement
Particulars Amount (₹)
Sales 86,00,000
Less: Variable cost (65% of 86,00,000) 55,90,000
Contribution (35% of 86,00,000) 30,10,000
Less: Fixed costs 10,00,000
Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) 20,10,000
Less: Interest on debt (@ 10% on ₹55 lakhs) 5,50,000
Earnings before tax (EBT) 14,60,000
Tax (40%) 5,84,000
PAT 8,76,000
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
(i) ROCE (Pre-tax) = 𝐶𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐸𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑦𝑒𝑑
× 100 = 𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦 + 𝐷𝑒𝑏𝑡
× 100
₹20,10,000
₹(75,00,000+55,00,000)
× 100 = 15.46%
EPS (PAT/ No. of equity shares) 1.168 or ₹1.17
(ii) ROCE is 15.46% and Interest on debt is 10%. Hence, it has a favourable financial leverage.
(iii) Calculation of Operating, Financial and Combined leverages:
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ₹30,10,000
Operating Leverage = 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
= ₹20,10,000 = 1.497 (approx)
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 ₹20,10,000
Financial Leverage = 𝐸𝐵𝑇 = ₹14,60,000 = 1.377 (approx.)
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ₹30,10,000
Combined Leverage = 𝐸𝐵𝑇
= ₹14,60,000 = 2.062 (approx.)
Or, = Operating Leverage × Financial Leverage = 1.497 × 1.377 = 2.06 (approx.)
(iv) Operating leverage is 1.497. So, if sales are increased by 10%.
EBIT will be increased by 1.497 × 10% i.e. 14.97% (approx.)
(v) Since the combined Leverage is 2.062, sales have to drop by 100/2.062 i.e. 48.50% to bring EBT
to Zero.
Accordingly, New Sales = ₹86,00,000 × (1 - 0.4850)
= ₹86,00,000 × 0.515
= ₹44,29,000 (approx.)
Hence, at ₹44,29,000 sales level, EBT of the firm will be equal to Zero.
Solution 2:
(1) Preparation of Profit – Loss Statement Working Notes:
Post tax interest 5.60%
Tax rate 30%
Pre tax interest rate = (5.6/70) x 100 8%
Loan amount ₹ 1,25,000
Interest amount = 1,25,000 x 8% ₹ 10,000
(
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
)( 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
) (
Financial Leverage (FL) = 𝐸𝐵𝑇 = (𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 − 𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡) = (𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 −10,000) )
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
1.5 = (𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 −10,000)
1.5 EBIT -15000 = EBIT
1.5 EBIT – EBIT = 15,000
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
4. Sales = 𝑃𝑉 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜
60,000
= 30%
= ₹ 2,00,000
Solution 3:
1. Income Statement
Particulars Company P (₹) Company Q (₹)
Sales 40,00,000 18,00,000
Less: Variable Cost 30,00,000 12,00,000
Contribution 10,00,000 6,00,000
Less: Fixed Cost 8,00,000 4,50,000
EBIT 2,00,000 1,50,000
Less: Interest 1,50,000 1,00,000
EBT 50,000 50,000
Tax (45%) 22,500 22,500
EAT 27,500 27,500
Workings:
(i) Margin of Safety
For Company P = 0.20
For Company Q = 0.20 x 1.25 = 0.25
(ii) Interest Expenses
For Company P = ₹ 1,50,000
For Company Q = ₹ 1,50,000 (1-1/3) = ₹ 1,00,000
(iii) Financial Leverage
For Company P = 4
For Company Q = 4 x 75% = 3
(iv) EBIT
For Company A
Financial Leverage = EBIT/(EBIT- Interest)
4 = EBIT/(EBIT- ₹ 1,50,000)
4EBIT – ₹ 6,00,000 = EBIT
EBIT = ₹ 2,00,000
For Company B
Financial Leverage = EBIT/(EBIT - Interest)
3 = EBIT/(EBIT – ₹ 1,00,000)
3EBIT – ₹ 3,00,000 = EBIT
2EBIT = ₹ 3,00,000
EBIT = ₹ 1,50,000
(i) Contribution For Company A
Operating Leverage = 1/Margin of Safety
= 1/0.20 = 5
Operating Leverage = Contribution/EBIT
5 = Contribution/₹ 2,00,000 Contribution
= ₹ 10,00,000
For Company B
Operating Leverage = 1/Margin of Safety
= 1/0.25 = 4
Operating Leverage = Contribution/EBIT
4 = Contribution/ ₹1,50,000
Contribution = ₹ 6,00,000
(ii) Sales
For Company A
Profit Volume Ratio = 25%
Profit Volume Ratio = Contribution/Sales x 100
25% = ₹ 10,00,000/Sales
Sales = ₹ 10,00,000/25%
Sales = ₹ 40,00,000
For Company B
Profit Volume Ratio = 33.33%
Therefore, Sales = ₹ 6,00,000/33.33%
Sales = ₹ 18,00,000
Solution 4:
Solution 6:
Break Even Sales = ₹ 6800000×0.75 = ₹ 51,00,000
Income Statement (Amount in ₹)
Original Calculation of Interest Now at present
at BEP (backward level
calculation)
Sales 68,00,000 51,00,000 68,00,000
Less: Variable Cost 40,80,000 30,60,000 40,80,000
Contribution 27,20,000 20,40,000 27,20,000
Less: Fixed Cost 16,32,000 16,32,000 16,32,000
EBIT 10,88,000 4,08,000 10,88,000
Less: Interest (EBIT-PBT) ? 3,93,714 3,93,714
PBT ? 14,286(10,000/70%) 6,94,286
Less: Tax @ 30%(or PBT-PAT) ? 4,286 2,08,286
PAT ? 10,000(Nil+10,000) 4,86,000
Less: Preference Dividend 10,000 10,000 10,000
Earnings for Equity share holders ? Nil (at BEP) 4,76,000
Number of Equity Shares 1,50,000 1,50,000 1,50,000
EPS ? - 3.1733
So Interest=₹3,93,714, EPS=₹3.1733, Amount of debt=3,93,714/12%=₹ 32,80,950
Solution 7:
Income Statement
Particulars Amount (₹)
Sales 1,11,00,000
Contribution (Sales × P/V ratio) 27,75,000
Less: Fixed cost (excluding Interest) (7,15,000)
Solution 8:
Firms
A(₹.) B(₹.) C(₹.) D(₹.)
Sales 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Sales revenue (Units × price) (₹.) 1,00,000 1,60,000 2,50,000 3,50,000
Less: Variable cost (30,000) (80,000) (1,00,000) (2,50,000)
(Units × variable cost per unit) (₹.)
Less: Fixed operating costs (₹.) (60,000) (40,000) (1,00,000) Nil
EBIT 10,000 40,000 50,000 1,00,000
𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠 (𝑆)− 𝑉𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑠 (𝑉𝐶)
DOL = 𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
₹.1,00,000 − ₹.30,000
DOL(A) = ₹.10,000
= 7
₹.1,60,000 − ₹. 80,000
DOL(B) = ₹. 40,000
= 2
₹.2,50,000 − ₹. 1,00,000
DOL(C) = ₹. 50,000
= 3
₹.3,50,000 − ₹. 2,50,000
DOL(D) = ₹. 1,00,000
= 1
The operating leverage exists only when there are fixed costs. In the case of firm D, there is no magnified
effect on the EBIT due to change in sales. A 20 per cent increase in sales has resulted in a 20 per cent increase
in EBIT. In the case of other firms, operating leverage exists. It is maximum in firm A, followed by firm C and
minimum in firm B. The interception of DOL of 7 is that1 per cent change in sales results in 7 per cent change
in EBIT level in the direction of the change of sales level of firm A.
Solution 9:
Contribution per unit = Sales Price Variable Cost = ₹. 30 – ₹. 20 = ₹. 10 p.u.
Total Contribution = (10,000 units × 60%) × ₹. 10p.u = ₹. 60,000
XY (In ₹.) XM (In ₹.)
Financial Plan
Situation A Situation B Situation A Situation B
Total Contribution 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000
Less: Fixed cost (20,000) (25,000) (20,000) (25,000)
EBIT 40,000 35,000 40,000 35,000
40,000 × 12% 40,000 × 12% 10,000 × 12% 10,000 × 12%
Less: Interest (4,800) (4,800) (1,200) (1,200)
EBT 35,200 30,200 38,800 33,800
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
DOL = 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 1.50 times 1.71 times 1.50 times 1.71 times
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
DFL = 𝐸𝐵𝑇 1.14 times 1.16 times 1.03 times 1.04 times
Solution 13.
Statement for calculating of DOL
Particulars Original Proposed
Equity 5,00,000 5,00,000
Debt - 4,00,000
Sales 5,00,000 6,65,000
-VC 2,50,000 2,80,000
Contribution 4,50,000 3,85,000
- FC 4,00,000 4,00,000
50,000
Profit/EBIT 50,000 1,35,000
Int. 4,00,000 x 10% 40,000
EBT 95,000 new
VC pu = 2,50,000/5,000 = 50 – 10 = 40
Advices: Yes profit accept us included in profit
DOL = C/EBIT = 2,50,000/50,000 = 5 times 3,85,000/1,35,000 = 2.85 times
Solution 14:
(i) Degree of operating leverage is computed as % Change in operating Income / % Change in Revenue
Firm Degree of Operating Leverage Beta
PQR Ltd. 25/27 = 0.92 1.00
RST Ltd. 32/25 = 1.28 1.15
TUV Ltd. 36/23 = 1.56 1.30
WXY Ltd. 40/21 = 1.90 1.40
(ii) The degree of operating leverage and the beta have a clear relationship. The greater the degree of
operating leverage, the more responsive income will be to changes in revenue which are correlated with
changes in market movements.
Solution 16:
Percentage change in Earnings per share
% 𝐶ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝐸𝑃𝑆
DCL = % 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
% 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝐸𝑃𝑆
2.475 = 5%
∴ % Change in EPS = 12.375%.
Working Notes:
Solution 17:
Calculation of Leverages:
Particulars ₹.
Sales 60,00,000
Less: Variable cost (sales × 100/150) (4,00,000)
Contribution 20,00,000
Less: Fixed Cost (5,00,000)
EBIT 15,00,000
Less: Interest on Debentures (3,30,000)
EBIT 11,70,000
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
Operating Leverage = 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
₹.20,00,000
= ₹.15,00,000
= 1.3333 times
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
Financial Leverage = 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
₹.15,00,000
= ₹.11,70,000
= 1.2821 times
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
Combined Leverage = Operating Leverage × Financial Leverage or 𝐸𝐵𝑇
₹.20,00,000
= 1.3333 × 1.2821 or ₹.11,70,000
= 1.7094 times
Solution 18:
Computation of Degree of Operating leverage, Financial leverage & Combined leverage of two Companies
Particulars Company A Company B
Sales revenue 18,00,000 37,50,000
(60,000 units × ₹. 30) (15,000 units × ₹. 250)
Less: Variable costs (6,00,000) (11,25,000)
(60,000 units × ₹. 10) (15,000 units × ₹. 75)
Contribution 12,00,000 26,25,000
Less: Fixed Costs (7,00,000) (14,00,000)
EBIT 5,00,000 12,25,000
Less: Interest @ 12% on Debentures (48,000) (78,000)
EBT 4,52,000 11,47,000
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
DOL = 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 (₹.12,00,000/₹. 5,00,000) (₹.26,25,000/₹. 12,25,000)
= 2.4 times = 2.14 times
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
DFL = 𝐸𝐵𝑇 (₹.5,00,000/₹. 4,52,000) (₹.12,25,000/₹. 11,47,000)
= 1.11 times = 1.07 times
DCL = DOL × DFL (2.4 × 1.11) = 2.66 times (2.14 × 1.07) = 2.29 times
Solution 19:
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 ₹. 27,00,000
(i) ROI = 𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡
= 𝐷𝑒𝑏𝑡+𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦
= ₹. 1,00,00,000
= 0.27 = 27%
𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
(iii) Asset Turnover = 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠=𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡
₹. 75,00,000
Firm’s assets turnover is = ₹. 1,00,00,000 = 0.75
The industry average is 3. Hence the firm has low asset leverage.
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ₹. 33,00,000
(iv) Operating leverage = 𝐸𝐵𝑇
= ₹. 27,00,000 = 1.2222 times
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 ₹. 27,00,000
Financial leverage = 𝐸𝐵𝑇
= ₹. 22,95,000 = 1.1764 times
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ₹. 33,00,000
Combined leverage = 𝐸𝐵𝑇
= ₹. 22,95,000 = 1.438 times
Or
Combined leverage = Operating leverage × Financial leverage
= 1.2222 × 1.1764 = 1.438 times
(v) If the sales drop to ₹. 50,00,000 from ₹. 75,00,000, the fall is by 33.33%.
Hence EBIT will drop by 40.73% (% Fall in sales × operating leverage)
∴ The new EBIT will be ₹. 27,00,000 × (1 – 40.73%)
= ₹. 16,00,290 or rounded upto ₹. 16,00,000.
(vi) EBT to become zero means 100% reduction in EBT. Since the combined leverage is 1.438 times,
sales have to drop by 100/1.438 i.e. 69.54%.
Hence the new sales will be ₹. 75,00,000 × (1 – 69.54%) = ₹. 22,84,500 (approx.)
Working Notes:
Particulars ₹.
Sales 75,00,000
Less: Variable cost (42,00,000)
Contribution 33,00,000
Less: Fixed Costs (6,00,000)
EBIT 27,00,000
Less: 9% interest on ₹. 45,00,000 (4,05,000)
EBT 22,95,000
Solution 22.
Total Liability = Debt + Equity
= 60,000 + 20,000 = 80,000
80,000 = Total liability = Total Assets
Assets turnover = Sale/Total Assets
2 = Sales/80,000
Sales = ₹ 1,60,000
Statement for computing leverage
Particulars (a)A (a)B (a)C (b)A (b)B
Sales 1,60,000 1,60,000 1,60,000 1,60,000
(-)VC
Con. 40% 64,000 64,000 64,000 64,000
(-)FC 4,000 4,000 4,000 6,000 6,000
EBIT 60,000 60,000 60,000 58,000
(-) Int 2,000 4,000 6,000 2,000
EBT 58,000 56,000 54,000 56,000
C 64,000 64,000 64,000 64,000
DOL = C/EBIT 60,000 60,000 60,000 58,000
DOE = EBIT/EBT 60,000/58,000 60,000/56,000 60,000/54,000 58,000/56,000
Solution 23:
Ratios for the year 2020-21
(i)Inventory turnover ratio
(ii)Financial leverage
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 ₹33,250
= 𝐸𝐵𝑇 = ₹22,750 = 1.46
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇(1−𝑡) ₹33,250(1−0.3) ₹23275
(iii)ROCE = 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐶𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐸𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑦𝑒𝑑
= ₹2,10,000+₹1,92,500 = ₹2,01,250
× 100 = 11.56%
2
Solution 26:
₹.14.4 𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠
(i) Earnings per share = 1 𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠
= ₹. 14.40
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ₹. 35
(ii) Operating Leverage = 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
= ₹. 27 = 1.296 times
It indicates the choice of technology and fixed cost in cost structure. It is level specific. When firm operates
beyond operating break-even level, then operating leverage is low. It indicates sensitivity of earnings before
interest and tax (EBIT) to change in sales at a particular level.
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 ₹. 27
(iii) Financial Leverage = 𝑃𝐵𝑇 = ₹. 24 = 1.125 times
The financial leverage is favourable since the debt service obligation is small vis-a-vis EBIT.
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
(iv) Combined Leverage = 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
× 𝑃𝐵𝑇 = 1.296 × 1.125 = 1.458 times
The combined leverage studies the choice of fixed cost in cost structure and choice of debt in capital
structure. It studies how sensitive the change in EPS is vis-a-vis change in sales.
The leverages – operating, financial and combined are measures of risk.
𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 15
(v) Current Ratio = 𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐿𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠 = 8 = 1.88
Working Notes:
Total Assets = ₹. 40 crores
Total Asset Turnover Ratio = 2.5 times
Hence, Total Sales = 40 × 2.5 = ₹. 100 crores
Solution 29:
(a) Calculation of Degree of Operating (DOL), Financial (DFL) and Combined leverages (DCL).
₹.3,40,000−₹.60,000
DOL = ₹.2,20,000
= 1.27 times.
₹.2,20,000
DFL = ₹.1,60,000
= 1.37 times.
DCL = DOL × DFL
= 1.27 × 1.37 = 1.75 times.
Working Notes:
(i) Variable Costs = ₹. 60,000 (Total cost – depreciation)
(ii) Variable Costs at:
(a) Sales level, ₹. 4,08,000 = ₹. 72,000
(b) Sales level, ₹. 2,72,000 = ₹. 48,000
Solution 32:
Computation of Earnings after tax
Contribution = ₹. 60 × 1,000 units = ₹. 60,000
Operating Leverage (OL) × Financial Leverage (FL) = Combined Leverage (CL)
6 × Financial Leverage = 24
∴ Financial Leverage = 4 times
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ₹. 60,000
Operating Leverage = 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
= 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 = 6
₹. 60,000
∴ EBIT = 6
= ₹. 10,000
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
Financial Leverage = 𝐸𝐵𝑇
=4
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 ₹. 10,000
∴ EBT = 4
= 4
= ₹. 2,500
Since tax rate = 30%
Earnings after Tax (EAT) = EBT (1 – 0.30)
= 2,500 (0.70)
∴ Earnings after Tax (EAT) = ₹. 1,750
Solution 33:
ROE = [ROI + {(ROI – r) × D/E}] (1 – t)
= [20% + {(20% – 10%) × 0.60}] (1 – 0.40)
= [20% + 6%] × 0.60 = 15.60%
Solution 35:
(i) Financial leverage
Combined Leverage = Operating Leverage (OL) × Financial Leverage (FL)
2.8 = 1.4 × FL
Financial Leverage = 2
Solution 37:
Income Statement (In ₹.)
Particulars Company A Company B
Sales 91,000 (Contribution + Variable cost) 1,05,000
Less: Variable Cost 56,000 63,000 (60% of 1,05,000)
Contribution 35,000 (EBIT + Fixed Cost) 42,000 (Sales – Variable Cost)
Less: Fixed cost 20,000 31,500 (Bal. Fig)= (Contribution – EBIT)
EBIT 15,000 (EBT + Interest) 10,500
Less: Interest 12,000 9,000
EBT 3,000 1,500 (EBIT – Interest)
Less: Tax 900 (30% on EBT) 450 (30% on EBT)
EAT 2,100 (EBT – Tax) 1,050 (EBT – Tax)
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 𝐸𝐵𝑇+𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ₹. 42,000
DFL = 𝐸𝐵𝑇
= 𝐸𝐵𝑇
= 5Times. DOL = 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
= 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
= 4Times
𝐸𝐵𝑇+₹. 12,000
So, 𝐸𝐵𝑇
= 5. EBT = ₹. 3,000 EBIT = ₹. 10,500
Solution 38.
I II III
TA 2,000 2,000 2,000
Debt : Equity 0:1 1:4 2:3
Debt 0 400 800
Equity 2000 1600 1200
ROI = EBIT/CE x 100 30% 30% 30%
EBIT = CE x ROI 600 600 600
(-) interest @ 15% - (60) (120)
EBT 600 540 480
(-) Tax @ 35%
EAT/EAES 390 351
ROE = EAES/Equity 390/2,000 351/1,600 312/1,200
19.5% 21.93% 26%
Here trading on equity is favourable because ROI > Interest Rate. Hence when we increase debt content in the
capital, then could earn more on equity funds. Hence ROE has increased with increase in leverage.
Solution 39:
₹. 12,00,000
(a) Operating Leverage = ₹. 2,00,000
= 6 times
₹. 2,00,000
(b) Financial Leverage = ₹. 1,00,000
= 2 times
(c) Combined Leverage = DOL × DFL = 6 × 2 = 12 times
50,000
(d) R.O.E. = 10,00,000 × 100 = 5%
(e) Operating Leverage = 6
𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
6 = 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
6 × 25% = Percentage change in EBIT
Percentage change in EBIT = 150%
Increase in EBIT = ₹. 2,00,000 × 150% = ₹. 3,00,000
New EBIT = 5,00,000
Working Notes.
Sales ₹. 24,00,000
Solution 41.
Computation of Profits after Tax (PAT)
Particulars Amount (₹)
Sales 84,00,000
Contribution (Sales × P/V ratio) 23,14,200
Less: Fixed cost (excluding Interest) (6,96,000)
EBIT (Earnings before interest and tax) 16,18,200
Less: Interest on debentures (12% x ₹ 37 lakhs) (4,44,000)
Less: Other fixed Interest (balancing figure) (88,160)
EBT (Earnings before tax) 10,86,040*
Less: Tax @ 40% 4,34,416
PAT (Profit after tax) 6,51,624
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ₹ 23,14,200
(i) Operating Leverage : 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
= ₹ 16,18,200
= 1.43
(ii) Combined Leverage: Operating Leverage × Financial Leverage = 1.43 x 1.49 = 2.13
Or,
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
Combined Leverage = 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
x 𝐸𝐵𝑇
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ₹ 23,14,200
Combined Leverage = 𝐸𝐵𝑇
= ₹ 10,86,040
= 2.13
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 ₹ 16,18,200
Financial Leverage = 𝐸𝐵𝑇
= 𝐸𝐵𝑇
= 1.49
₹ 16,18,200
So , EBT = 1.49
= ₹ 10,86,040
𝑃𝐴𝑇 ₹ 6,51,624
(iii) Earnings per share (EPS) : = 𝑁𝑜. 𝑜𝑓 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔
= 5,00,000 𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠
= ₹ 1.30
Solution 42.
Workings:
1. Contribution = Sales x P/V ratio= ₹ 15,00,000 x 70% = ₹ 10,50,000
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
2. Operating Leverage = 𝐸𝑎𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠 𝑏𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡 & 𝑇𝑎𝑥 (𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇)
₹ 10,50,000
Or, 1.4 = 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
EBIT = ₹ 7,50,000
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
3. Financial Leverage = 𝐸𝐵𝑇
₹ 7,50,000
Or , 1.25 = 𝐸𝐵𝑇
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ₹ 10,50,000
(i) Combined Leverage = 𝐸𝐵𝑇
= ₹ 6,00,000
= 1.75 times
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
So, 25 = ₹ 84,00,000
x 100
₹ 84,00,000
Contribution = 100
x 25 = ₹ 21,00,000
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
2. Financial Leverage = 𝐸𝐵𝑇
₹ 13,50,000
Or , 1.39 = 𝐸𝐵𝑇
(as calculated above)
EBT = ₹ 9,71,223
3. Income Statement
Particulars (₹)
Sales 84,00,000
Less: Variable Cost (Sales - Contribution) (63,00,000)
Contribution 21,00,000
Less: Fixed Cost (7,50,000)
EBIT 13,50,000
Less: Interest (EBIT - EBT) (3,78,777)
EBT 9,71,223
Less: Tax @ 30% (2,91,367)
Profit after Tax (PAT) 6,79,856
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ₹ 21,00,000
(i) Operating leverage = 𝐸𝑎𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠 𝑏𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡𝑎𝑥 (𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇)
= ₹ 13,50,000
= 1.556 (approx.)
𝑃𝐴𝑇 ₹ 6,79,856
(iii) Earnings per share (EPS) = 𝑁𝑜. 𝑜𝑓 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 = 50,000
= ₹ 13.597
𝐸𝑃𝑆 ₹ 13.597
(iv) Earning Yield = 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑒𝑡 𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒
x 100 = ₹ 200
x 100 = ₹ 13.597
Solution 44:
(i) Calculation of P/V ratio ,EPS, Financial Leverage and Asset Turnover
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 (𝐶)
Operating leverage = 𝐶 – 𝐹𝑖𝑥𝑒𝑑 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 (𝐹𝐶) x 100
𝐶
1.2 = 𝐶 − 2,25,000
₹ 6,19,500
EPS = ₹ 3,85,000
= ₹ 1.61
Therefore , at ₹ 15,50,000 level of sales , the Earnings before tax of the company will be equal to zero.
(Note: Question may also be solved in alternative ways.)
Solution 45:
(i) Working Notes
Earnings after tax (EAT)is 5% of sales
Income tax is 50%
So, EBT is 10% of Sales
Since Interest Expenses is ₹ 30,000
EBIT = 10% of Sales + ₹ 30,000……………………………………………………. (Equation i)
Now Degree of operating leverage = 4
So, Contribution / EBIT = 4
Or, Contribution = 4 EBIT
Or, Sales – Variable Cost = 4 EBIT
Or, Sales – ₹ 6,00,000 = 4 EBIT ………………………………………………………………………(Equation ii)
Replacing the value of EBIT of equation (i) in Equation (ii)
We get, Sales – ₹ 6,00,000 = 4 (10% of Sales + ₹ 30,000)
Or, Sales – ₹ 6,00,000 = 40% of Sales + ₹ 1,20,000
Or, 60% of Sales = ₹ 7,20,000
₹ 7,20,000
So, Sales = 60% = ₹ 12,00,000
₹ 6,00,000
EBIT = 4
= ₹ 1,50,000
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 1,50,000
(ii) Financial leverage = 𝐸𝐵𝑇
= 1,20,000
= 1.25 times
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ₹ 6,00,000
Combined Leverage = 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
= ₹ 1,20,000
= 5 times
₹ 12,00,000
Or, Sales = 25
= ₹ 48,00,000
𝐶𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡 𝑃𝑢𝑟𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑠*
Creditors turnover ratio = 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐴𝑐𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑠 𝑃𝑎𝑦𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑠
= ₹ 36,30,000 =6
Sundry Creditors + Bills Payables
So Sundry Creditors + Bills Payable = ₹ 6,05,000
Or, Sundry Creditors + ₹ 30,000 = ₹ 6,05,000
Or, Sundry Creditors = ₹ 5,75,000
Workings:
*Calculations of Credit Purchases:
Cost of goods sold = Opening Stock + Purchases – Closing Stock
₹ 36,00,000 = ₹ 23,85,000 + Purchases – ₹ 24,15,000
Purchases (credit) = ₹ 36,30,000
Solution 2:
Working Notes:
(1) Total liability = Total Assets = ₹ 50,00,000
Debt to Total Assets Ratio = 0.40
𝐷𝑒𝑏𝑡
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
= 0.40
𝐷𝑒𝑏𝑡
Or, 50,00,000
= 0.40
So Debt = 20,00,000
𝐿𝑜𝑛𝑔−𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚 𝐷𝑒𝑏𝑡
(3) 𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑆ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒ℎ𝑜𝑙𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑠’ 𝐹𝑢𝑛𝑑
= 30%*
36
Accounts Receivables = 360
x Credit Sales
36
= 360
x 80,00,000 (Assumed all sales are on credit)
11,00,000
Cash + 8,00,000 = ₹ 9,90,000
Cash = ₹ 1,90,000
(9) Fixed Assets = Total Assets – Current Assets = 50,00,000 – (9,77,778 + 8,00,000 + 1,90,000) = 30,32,222
Balance Sheet of ABC Industries as on 31st March 2021
Liabilities ₹ Assets ₹
Share Capital 20,00,000 Fixed Assets 30,32,222
Reserved Surplus 10,00,000 Current Assets:
Long term debt 9,00,000 Inventory 9,77,778
Accounts payable 11,00,000 Accounts 8,00,000
Receivables
Cash 1,90,000
Total 50,00,000 Total 50,00,000
(* Note: Equity shareholders’ fund represents equity in “Long term debts to equity ratio”. The question can be
solved assuming only share capital as ‘equity’)
Solution 3:
Calculation of Fixed Assets and Proprietor’s Funds
𝐹𝑖𝑥𝑒𝑑 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 0.75
' = 1
𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑟 𝑠 𝐹𝑢𝑛𝑑
Fixed Assets = 0.75 Proprietor’s Fund
Proprietor’s Fund = Total Assets – Current Liabilities
Proprietor’s Fund = Fixed Assets + Current Assets – Current Liabilities
Proprietor’s Fund = Fixed Assets + Net Working Capital
Proprietor’s Fund = 0.75 Proprietor’s fund + Net Working Capital
0.25 Proprietor’s Fund = ₹ 6,00,000
₹6,00,000
Proprietor’s Fund = 0.25 = ₹ 24,00,000
Therefore, Fixed Assets = 0.75 × ₹ 24,00,000
= ₹ 18,00,000
Solution 4:
Ratios for the year 2005-2006(₹ in Lakhs)
𝐶𝑂𝐺𝑆 ₹20,860
(i) (a) Inventory Turnover Ratio = 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦 = ₹2,867+₹2,407 = 7.91 times
( 2
)
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 ₹170
(b) Financial Leverage = 𝑃𝐵𝑇
=₹ 57
= 2.98 times
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 ₹170
(c) Return on Investment= 𝐶𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐸𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑦𝑒𝑑
= ₹5,947+₹4,555 = 3.24%
2
𝑃𝐴𝑇 ₹34 ₹ 34
(d) ROE= ' = ₹ 2,377+₹ 1,472 = ₹1,924.5
= 1.77%
𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑆ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒ℎ𝑜𝑙𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑠 𝐹𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑠 2
(ii) Brief Comment on the financial position of JKL Ltd. = The Profitability of operations of the
company are showing sharp decline due to increase in Operating expenses. The financial and
operating leverages are becoming adverse. The liquidity of the company is under great stress.
Solution 6:
a. Calculation of Quick Ratio
𝑄𝑢𝑖𝑐𝑘 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 ₹ 3,30,000
Quick Ratio = 𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐿𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠 = ₹ 3,00,000
= 1.1:1 times
𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠 ₹ 35,00,000
Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio = 𝐹𝑖𝑥𝑒𝑑 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
= ₹ 10,00,000
= 3.5 times
Working Notes:
1. Net Working Capital = Current Assets – Current Liabilities
2.5 – 1 = 1.5
𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑊𝑜𝑟𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐶𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙 × 2.5 ₹ 4,50,000 × 2.5
Thus, Current Assets = 1.5
= 1.5
= ₹ 7,50,000
Current Liabilities = ₹ 7,50,000 – ₹ 4,50,000= ₹ 3,00,000
𝑇𝑢𝑟𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟
2. Total Assets Turnover Ratio = 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
=2
Sales = Total Assets Turnover × Total Assets
= 2 × (₹ 10,00,000 + ₹ 7,50,000) = ₹ 35,00,000
5. Profit After Tax (PAT) = Total Assets × Return on Total Assets = ₹ 17,50,000× 15% = ₹ 2,62,500
Solution 7:
(In ‘000)
Ratio Formula 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 Industry
Average
Current 𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 1,320
= 2.54
6,200
= 1.80
8,912
= 1.60 2.30:1
𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐿𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠 520 3,456 5,560
ratio
Acid test 𝑄𝑢𝑖𝑐𝑘 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 680
= 1.31
3,200
= 0.93
4,412
= 0.79 1.20:1
𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐿𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠 520 3,456 5,560
ratio (quick
ratio)
Receivable 𝐶𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠 3,600
=
8,640 14,400 7 times
𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐴𝑐𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑠 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 (600 +600)/2 (600 +3000)/2 (3000 + 4,200)/2
turnover
6 = 4.80 =4
ratio
Inventory 𝐶𝑂𝐺𝑆 2,480
=
5,664 9,600
= 4.85 times
𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦 (640 + 640)/2 (640 + 3,000)/2 (3,000 + 4,500)/2
turnover
3.88 = 3.11 2.56
ratios
Long-term 𝐿𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑡
x 100
1,472
x100 =
2,472
x 100
5,000
x 100 24%
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐷𝑒𝑏𝑡 1,992 5,928 10,560
debt to
73.90% = 41.70% = 47.35%
total debt
Conclusion:
In the last two years, the current ratio and quick ratio are less than the ideal ratio (2:1 and 1:1 respectively)
indicating that the company is not having enough resources to meet its current obligations. Receivables are
growing slower. Inventory turnover is slowing down as well, indicating a relative build-up in inventories or
increased investment in stock. High Long-term debt to total debt ratio and Debt to equity ratio compared to
that of industry average indicates high dependency on long term debt by the company. The net profit ratio is
declining substantially and is much lower than the industry norm. Additionally, though the Return on Total
Asset (ROTA) is near to industry average, it is declining as well. The interest coverage ratio measures how
many times a company can cover its current interest payment with its available earnings. A high interest
coverage ratio means that an enterprise can easily meet its interest obligations, however, it is declining in the
case of Jensen & Spencer and is also below the industry average indicating excessive use of debt or inefficient
operations.
On overall comparison of the industry average of key ratios than that of Jensen & Spencer, the company is in
deterioration position. The company’s profitability has declined steadily over the period. However, before
jumping to the conclusion relying only on the key ratios, it is pertinent to keep in mind the industry, the
company dealing in with i.e. manufacturing of pharmaceutical drugs. The pharmaceutical industry is one of
the major contributors to the economy and is expected to grow further. After the covid situation, people are
more cautious towards their health and are going to spend relatively more on health medicines. Thus, while
analyzing the loan proposal, both the factors, financial and non-financial, needs to be kept in mind.
Solution 8:
𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 ₹ 3,75,000
(1) Current Ratio = 𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐿𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠
= ₹1,65,000
= 2.27 : 1
𝐷𝑒𝑏𝑡 ₹ 3,50,000
(3) Debt Equity Ratio = 𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦
= ₹ 7,50,000
= 0.467 : 1
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 4.09−0.35−0.25−0.50
(4) Interest coverage Ratio = 𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡
= 0.47
= 6.36 times
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 ₹2.99
(5) Fixed Charge Coverage= 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑓.𝐷𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑑 = ₹0.2 = 3.44 times
𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡+ (𝑖−𝑡)
₹0.47+ (𝑖−0.5)
𝐶𝑂𝐺𝑆 ₹ 11,00,000
(6) STR = 𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑘
= ₹ 1,50,000+ ₹ 1,75,000 = 6.77 times
2
360 𝑑𝑎𝑦𝑠
(8) Average Collection Period = 12
= 30 days
𝑃𝐴𝑇 ₹ 1,26,000
(10) Net Profit Ratio = 𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
× 100 = ₹ 15,00,000
× 100 = 8.4%
𝐸𝐴𝑇 ₹ 1,26,000
(14) Return on Shareholder’s fund = ' × 100 = ₹ 7,50,000
× 100 = 16.8%
𝑆ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒ℎ𝑜𝑙𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑
𝑀𝑃𝑆 ₹ 45
(15) P/E Ratio = 𝐸𝑃𝑆
= ₹ 3.03
= ₹ 14.85 times
𝐸𝑃𝑆 ₹ 3.03
(16) Earning Yield = 𝑀𝑃𝑆
× 100 = ₹ 45
× 100 = 6.73%
Solution 9:
𝐸𝐴𝑇+𝑇𝑎𝑥 +𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡 480+125+162
(i) Interest Coverage Ratio= 𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡
= 162
= 4.73 times
Solution 10:
Computation of Ratios
Particulars 2009 2010
1. Gross Profit Ratio
64,000 76,000
Gross Profit/Sales 3,00,000
x 100 3,74,000
x 100
= 21.3% = 20.3%
2. Operating Expense to Sales Ratio
49,000 57,000
Operating Expenses/Total Sales 3,00,000
x 100 3,74,000
x 100
= 16.3% = 15.2%
3. Operating Profit Ratio
15,000 19,000
Operating Profit/ Total Sales 3,00,000
x 100 3,74,000
x 100
= 5% = 5.08%
4. Capital Turnover Ratio
3,00,000 3,74,000
Sales/ Capital Employed 1,00,000
= 3 times 1,47,000
=2.54 times
5. Stock Turnover ratio
2,36,000 2,98,000
COGS/ Average Stock 50,000
= 4.7times 77,000
= 3.9 times
15,,000 17,,000
Net Profit/ Net Worth 1,00,000
x 100 =15% 1,00,000
x100=14.5%
7. Debtors Collection Period
50,000 82,000
Average Debtors/ Average Daily Sales [wn 1] 739.73 936.99
= 67.6 days = 87.5 days
Working note:
2,70,000 3,42,000
(1) Average Daily Sales = Credit Sales/ 365 365 365
= ₹ 739.73 = ₹ 936.99
Analysis: The decline in the Gross profit ratio could be either due to a reduction in the selling price or increase
in the direct expenses. Similarly there is a decline in the ratio of Operating expenses to sales. And in depth
analysis reveals that the decline in the warehousing and the administrative expenses has been partly set off by
an increase in the transport and the selling expenses. The operating profit ratio has remained the same in spite
of a decline in the Gross profit margin ratio.
The company has not been able to deploy its capital efficiently. This is indicated by a decline in the Capital
turnover from 3 to 2.5 times. In case the capital turnover would have remained at 3 the company would have
increased sales and profits by ₹ 67,000 and ₹ 3,350 respectively.
The decline in the stock turnover ratio implies that the company has increased its investment in stock. Return
on Net worth has declined indicating that the additional capital employed has failed to increase the volume of
sales proportionately. The increase in the Average collection period indicates that the company has become
liberal in extending credit on sales. However, there is a corresponding increase in the current assets due to
such a policy.
It appears as if the decision to expand the business has not shown the desired results.
Solution 12:
(a)Inventory turnover = Cost of goods sold/Average inventory
Since gross profit margin is 15 per cent, the cost of goods sold should be 85 per cent of the sales.
Solution 14:
Working Notes:
(i) Cost of Goods Sold = Sales – Gross Profit (25% of sales)
= ₹ 30,00,000 – ₹ 7,50,000= ₹ 22,50,000
Solution 15:
𝐷𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑑 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑆ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒 ₹2 (0.20 × ₹10)
(a) Dividend Yield on the Equity Shares = 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑒𝑡 𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑆ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒
× 100 = ₹40
× 100 = 5%
Solution 16(a):
𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑡
(a) Sales Gross Profit Ratio = 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
₹5,00,000
20% = 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
Sales = ₹ 25,00,000
12
3= 𝐷𝑒𝑏𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑠 𝑇𝑢𝑟𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜
𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
Debtor Turnover Ratio = 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒
₹25,00,000
4= 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒
₹22,00,000
6= 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑃𝑎𝑦𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒
Average Payable = ₹ 3,36,667
Average Payable = Bill Payable + Creditors
₹ 3,36,667 = ₹ 36,667 + Creditors
Creditors = ₹ 3,30,000
Working Notes:
(i) Cost of Goods sold = Net Sales – Gross Profit = ₹ 25,00,000 – ₹ 5,00,000 = ₹ 20,00,000
₹20,00,000
2= 2𝑥+2,00,000
2
x = ₹ 9,00,000
Opening Stock = ₹ 9,00,000
Therefore, Closing Stock = ₹ 9,00,000 + ₹ 20,000 = ₹ 11,00,000
Solution 17:
(i) Computation of Opening Stock
Gross Profit = 20 % of sales = 20% of ₹ 40,00,000 = ₹ 8,00,000
Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) = Sales - Gross Profit = ₹ 40,00,000 – ₹ 8,00,000 = ₹ 32,00,000
𝐶𝑂𝐺𝑆
Inventory Turnover Ratio = 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦
₹ 32,00,000
Or, 8 = 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦
Average Inventory = ₹ 4,00,000
Now, Closing Stock = Opening stock + ₹ 40,000
𝑂𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑘 + 𝐶𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑘
2
= ₹ 4,00,000
CA = 1.5 CL
𝐶𝐴
Or, CL = 1.5
𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑘 𝑂𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑓𝑡 2
Now, 𝑂𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝐶𝐿
= 1
𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑘 𝑂𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑓𝑡 2
Or , ₹ 5,70,000 – 𝑏𝑎𝑛𝑘 𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑓𝑡
= 1
Or , ₹ 11,40,000 – 2 bank overdraft = bank overdraft
Bank Overdraft = ₹ 3,80,000
Solution 18:
Balance Sheet
Liabilities Amount (₹) Assets Amount (₹)
Capital 8,00,000 Fixed Assets 7,20,000
Reserves & Surplus 1,60,000 Stock 1,60,000
Bank Overdraft 40,000 Current Assets 2,40,000
Sundry Creditors 1,20,000
11,20,000 11,20,000
Working Notes
𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
(1) Current Ratio = 𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐿𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠
𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
2.5 = 𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐿𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠
𝑄𝑢𝑖𝑐𝑘 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
(4) Quick Ratio = 𝑄𝑢𝑖𝑐𝑘 𝐿𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠
𝑄𝑢𝑖𝑐𝑘 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
1.5 = ₹1,20,000
Quick Assets = ₹ 1,80,000
𝐹𝑖𝑥𝑒𝑑 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
(6) 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑦 𝐹𝑢𝑛𝑑
= 0.75
Fixed Assets = 0.75 Proprietary Fund
Working Capital = 0.25 Proprietary Fund
₹ 2,40,000
Proprietary Fund = 0.25
Proprietary Fund = ₹ 9,60,000
Solution 19:
Balance Sheet(In ₹)
Equity Share Capital 4,87,500 Fixed Assets 6,00,000
Reserves 5,000 Current Assets
P&L A/c 7,500 Stock 18,750
Debt's 5,00,000 Debtors 18,750
Current Liabilities 18,750 Other Current Assets 7,62,500
Other Current Liabilities 3,81,250
14,00,000 14,00,000
Working Notes:
(1) Let CL be x
CA = 2x
Net WC = CA – CL
4,00,000 = 2x – x
x = 4,00,000
CL = 4,00,000
CA = 4,00,000 × 2 = ₹8,00,000
𝐹𝑖𝑥𝑒𝑑 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
(2) 𝑇𝑢𝑟𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟
=4
6,00,000
= 𝑇𝑢𝑟𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟
=4
Turnover = ₹ 1,50,000
2
(9) Reserve = 3
× 7,500 = ₹ 5,000
𝐷𝑒𝑏𝑡 1
(10) Capital Gearing ratio = ' = 1
𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑆ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒ℎ𝑜𝑙𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑟 𝑠𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑠
Capital employed = FA + Net WC
= ₹ 6,00,000 + ₹ 4,00,000
= ₹ 10,00,000
1
Debt = 10,00,000 × 2 = ₹ 5,00,000
1
Equity Shareholder’s Fund = 10,00,000 × 2
= ₹ 5,00,000
(11) Equity Share Capital = Equity Shareholder’s funds – Reserve – P & L A/c = 5,00,000 – 5,000 – 7,500
= ₹ 4,87,500
Solution 21:
(a) Calculation of operating Expenses for the year ended 31st March, 2010.
(₹)
Net profit [@ 6.25% of sales] 3,75,000
Add: Income Tax (@ 50%) 3,75,000
Profit Before Tax (PBT) 7,50,000
Add: Debenture Interest 60,000
Profit before interest and tax (PBIT) 8,10,000
Sales 60,00,000
Less: Cost of goods sold 18,00,000
PBIT 8,10,000 26,10,000
Operating Expenses 33,90,000
Working Notes:
(i) Share capital and Reserves
The return on net worth is 25%. Therefore, the profit after tax of ₹ 3,75,000 should be equivalent to 25%
of the net worth.
25
Net worth × 100 = ₹ 3,75,000
₹3,75,000×100
∴ New worth = 25
= ₹ 15,00,000
The ratio of share capital to reserves is 7:3
7
Share Capital = 15,00,000 × 10 = ₹ 10,50,000
3
Reserves = 15,00,000× 10 = ₹ 4,50,000
(ii) Debentures
Interest on Debentures @ 15% = ₹ 60,000
60,000×100
∴ Debentures = 15
= ₹ 4,00,000
Composition: ₹
Stock 1,50,000
Sundry Debtors 2,00,000
Cash (Balancing
Figure) 50,000
Total Current Assets 4,00,000
Solution 22:
Balance Sheet
Liabilities ₹ Assets ₹
Creditors 60,000 Cash 42,000
Long term Debt 2,40,000 Debtors 12,000
Shareholders’ funds 6,00,000 Inventory 54,000
Fixed assets 7,92,000
9,00,000 9,00,000
Working Note:
1. Gross Profit:
GP Margin = 20%
GP = ₹ 54,000
∴ Sales = ₹ 2,70,000
2. Credit Sales
Credit sales = 80% of total sales
= 2,70,000× 80%
= ₹ 2,16,000.
3. Total Assets:
𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
Total Assets Turnover = 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
= 0.3 times
2,70,000
∴ Total Assets = 0.3
= ₹ 9,00,000
4. Inventory Turnover :
𝐶𝑎𝑠ℎ
Inventory Turnover = 𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦
× 100
₹ 2,70,000−₹ 54,000
∴ 4 = 𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦
Inventory = ₹ 54,000
5. Debtors:
𝐶𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
Debtors = 360 𝑑𝑎𝑦𝑠
× 20 days
₹2,16,000
= 360 𝑑𝑎𝑦𝑠
× 2 = ₹ 12,000
7. Current Ratio:
𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
Current ratio = 𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐿𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠
𝐷𝑒𝑏𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑠+𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦+𝐶𝑎𝑠ℎ
1.8 = 𝐶𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑠
12,000+54,000+𝐶𝑎𝑠ℎ
1.8 = 60,000
Cash = ₹ 42,000
Solution 25:
Balance Sheet
Liabilities ₹ Assets ₹
Equity Share Capital 1,00,000 Fixed assets 60,000
Current Debt 24,000 Inventory 40,000
Long Term Debt 36,000 Cash 60,000
1,60,000 1,60,000
Working Notes:
1. Total Debt = 0.60 × Owner equity = 0.60 × ₹ 1,00,000 = ₹ 60,000
Current debt to Total debt = 0.40, hence current debt = 0.40 × 60,000 = ₹ 24,000
2. Fixed assets = 0.60 × Owners Equity = 0.60 × ₹ 1,00,000 = ₹ 60,000
3. Total Equity = Total Debt + Owners equity = ₹ 60,000 + ₹ 1,00,000 = ₹ 1,60,000
4. Total assets consisting of fixed assets and current assets must be equal to ₹ 1,60,000 (Assets =
Liabilities + Owners equity). Since Fixed assets are ₹ 60,000, hence Current assets should be ₹ 1,00,000
5. Total assets turnover = 2 Times : Inventory turnover = 8 times
𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦 2 1
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
= 8 = 4
𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦 1
₹1,60,000
= 4
or 4 × Inventory = 1 × ₹ 1,60,000
= ₹ 1,60,000
₹ 1,60,000
Or Inventory = 4
= ₹ 40,000
Balance on Asset side
∴ Cash = ₹ 1,60,000 – ₹ 60,000 – ₹ 40,000
= ₹ 60,000
Solution 26:
Balance Sheet
Liabilities ₹ Assets ₹
Notes and payables 1,00,000 Cash 50,000
Long-term debt 1,00,000 Accounts receivable 50,000
Common stock 1,00,000 Inventory 1,00,000
Retained earnings 1,00,000 Plant and equipment 2,00,000
Total liabilities and equity 4,00,000 Total assets 4,00,000
Working Notes
𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
= 2.5 = 4,00,000
Sales = ₹ 10,00,000
Cost of goods sold = (0.9) (₹ 10,00,000) = ₹ 9,00,000.
𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑔𝑜𝑜𝑑𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑑 9,00,000
𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦
= 𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦 = 9
Inventory = ₹ 1,00,000
𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑠 × 360
10,00,000
= 18 days
Receivables = ₹ 50,000
𝐶𝑎𝑠ℎ + 50,000
1,00,000
=1
Cash = ₹ 50,000
Plant and equipment = ₹ 2,00,000.
Solution 28:
1. Balance Sheet
Liabilities ₹ Assets ₹
Share Capital (WN6) 7,81,250 Fixed Assets (WN 3) 15,00,000
Reserves (WN6) 4,68,750 Current Assets
Long-Term Loans (Balancing Figure) 6,25,000 Stock (WN4) 3,75,000
Current Liabilities (WN8) 7,50,000 Debtors (WN5) 5,00,000
Bank (WN9) 2,50,000 11,25,000
Total 26,25,000 Total 26,25,000
Working Notes
1. Gross Profit Ratio= 25%of sales. So, Gross Profit = 25% × ₹ 30,00,000= ₹ 7,50,000
2. Cost of Goods Sold (COGS)= Sales – Gross Profit = ₹ 30,00,000 – ₹7,50,000 = ₹ 22,50,000
𝐶𝑂𝐺𝑆 ₹ 22,50,000
3. Fixed Assets Turnover (based on COGS)= 𝐹𝑖𝑥𝑒𝑑 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 = 𝐹𝑖𝑥𝑒𝑑 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 = 1.5 times.
₹ 22,50,000
Hence, Fixed Assets= 1.5
= ₹ 15,00,000
𝐶𝑂𝐺𝑆 ₹ 22,50,000 22,50,000
4. Stock Turnover = 𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦
= 𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦 =6 times. So, Inventory = 6
=₹ 3,75,000
2 2
5. Debt Collection Period= 2 months. So, Debtors= Sales × 12 = ₹ 30,00,000 × 12
= ₹ 5,00,000
𝐹𝑖𝑥𝑒𝑑 ₹ 15,00,000 ₹ 15,00,000
6. 𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑊𝑜𝑟𝑡ℎ
= 𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑊𝑜𝑟𝑡ℎ
= 1.20. So, Net Worth = 1.2
= ₹ 12,50,000
Re𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠serve & Surplus to Share Capital = 0.6:1
0.6
Reserve & Surplus = 12,50,000 × 1.6 = ₹ 4,68,750
1
Share Capital = 12,50,000 × 1.6
= ₹ 7,81,250
𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
7. Current Ratio = 𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐿𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠
= 1.5 times. So, Current Assets = 1.5 × Current Liabilities.
𝑄𝑢𝑖𝑐𝑘 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠−𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑘
8. Quick Ratio= 𝑄𝑢𝑖𝑐𝑘 𝐿𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠 = 1 time. So, 𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐿𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠 = 1.
1.5 × 𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐿𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠−₹ 3,75,000
𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐿𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠
=1
Current Liabilities = ₹ 7,50,000
9. Hence, Current assets= 1.5 × 7,50,000 = ₹ 11,25,000
Current Assets = Inventory + Debtors + Cash & Bank
₹ 11,25,000 = ₹ 3,75,000 + ₹ 5,00,000 + Cash & Bank
Cash & Bank = ₹ 2,50,000
𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝐶𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙+𝐷𝑒𝑏𝑡 𝑁𝑖𝑙+₹ 6,25,000
10. Verification of Long Term Loans: Capital Gearing Ratio = 𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑆ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒ℎ𝑜𝑙𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑠 𝐹𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑠
= ₹ 12,50,000
= 0.5
times.
Note: in the absence of information, Share Capital = Equity Share Capital only.
Net Worth = WN6 = ₹ 12,50,000. Debt is taken as balancing figure from the B/s above.
Solution 29:
Projected Profit and Loss Account for the year ended 31-3-2010
To Cost of Goods Sold 2,04,000 By Sales 2,40,000
To Gross Profit 36,000
2,40,000 2,40,000
To Debenture Interest 1,000 By Gross Profit 36,000
To Depreciation 5,000
To Administration and Other
Expenses 17,000
To Net Profit 13,000
36,000 36,000
𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠−𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑘
5. Quick Ratio= 𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐿𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠
=1
₹80,000−𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑘
= ₹50,000
=1
₹ 50,000 = ₹ 80,000 – Stock
Stock = ₹ 80,000 – ₹ 50,000 = ₹ 30,000
Solution 30:
Profit and Loss Statement of Check& Co.
Particulars Amount (₹)
Sales 50,00,000
Less: Variable Cost(60% on Sales) 30,00,000
Contribution 20,00,000
Less : Fixed cost(Balancing Figure) 9,00,000
EBIT 11,00,000
Less: Interest (Balancing Figure) 6,00,000
EBT(10% of sales of ₹ 50,00,000) 5,00,000
Less: Tax NIL
EAT 5,00,000
𝑄𝑢𝑖𝑐𝑘 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
3. Quick Ratio = 𝑄𝑢𝑖𝑐𝑘 𝐿𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠
= 1 time.
𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠−𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑘
𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐿𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠−𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑘 𝑂𝐷
=1
₹15,00,000−₹10,00,000
₹5,00,000−𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑘 𝑂𝐷
=1
Bank OD = ₹ Nil.
𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
4. Stock Turnover Ratio = 𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦
= ₹10,00,000
= 5.
Sales = ₹ 10,00,000 × 5 = ₹ 50,00,000
𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠 ₹50,00,000
5. Fixed Assets T/O = 𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝐹𝑖𝑥𝑒𝑑 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
= 𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝐹𝑖𝑥𝑒𝑑 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 = 1.2
₹50,00,000
Net Fixed Assets = 1.2
= ₹ 41,66,667
30
6. Average Collection Period = 30 days. Assuming 1 year = 360 days, Debtors = Sales × 360
= ₹ 50,00,000
30
× 360
= ₹ 4,16,667
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
7. Financial Leverage = 𝐸𝐵𝑇
= ₹5,00,000
= 2.20
9. Total External Liabilities = Long Term Liabilities + Current Liabilities = ₹ 50,00,000 + ₹ 5,00,000 = ₹
55,00,000
12. Retained Earnings = Net Worth – Share Capital = ₹ 20,00,000 – ₹ 5,00,000 = ₹ 15,00,000
Solution 31:
Trading and Profit and Loss Account for the period ending 31st December, 2010
To Cost of Materials 3,60,000 By Sales 12,00,000
To Wages & Overheads 5,40,000
To Gross Profit c/d 3,00,000
12,00,000 12,00,000
To Expenses & Depreciation
(Balancing Figure) 2,46,800 By Gross Profit b/d 3,00,000
To Net Profit 53,200
3,00,000 3,00,000
(2)
₹
Cost of Sales: 12,00,000
Sales 3,00,000
Less: Gross Profit 9,00,000
(3) Assuming stock and debtors are the only Current Assets:
₹9,00,000
(a) Stock in Trade = 5
= ₹ 1,80,000
₹12,00,000
(b) Debtors = 6
= ₹ 2,00,000
1
(4) Current Liabilities = 2
of ₹ 3,80,000 = ₹ 1,90,000
1
(5) Trade Creditors = 4
of ₹ 3,60,000 = ₹ 90,000
(6) Bank Overdraft: Current Liabilities – Trade Creditors
= 1,90,000 – 90,000 = ₹ 1,00,000
(7) Material: 40% of ₹ 9,00,000 = ₹ 3,60,000
(9) Total Capital employed: Fixed Assets + Working Capital = ₹7,60,000 + ₹ 1,90,000 = ₹ 9,50,000
Solution 32:
Return on Equity = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover Ratio × Equity Multiplier
= 0.1439 × 1.0455 × 2.0621 = 0.3102 or 31.02%
Working Notes:
Net Profit Margin = Net Income (₹ 4,212) ÷ Revenue (₹ 29,261) = 0.1439, or 14.39%
Asset Turnover Ratio = Revenue (₹ 29,261) ÷ Assets (₹ 27,987) = 1.0455 times
Equity Multiplier = Assets (₹ 27,987) ÷ Shareholders’ Equity (₹ 13,572) = 2.0621 times
Solution 33:
𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
(a) Capital Turnover Ratio = 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐶𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐸𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑦𝑒𝑑
𝑃.𝐴.𝑇.
(b) Net Operating Profit Ratio = 𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
× 100
PAT ₹ 80,000
Net Sales ₹ 3,00,000
Net Operating Profit Ratio 26.67%
Solution 34:
ROI = Net Operating Profit Ratio × Capital Turnover Ratio
Ram Ltd = 5% × 4 times = 20%
Shyam Ltd = 6% ×6 times = 36%
Working Notes:
Sales = ₹ 1,80,000/ 15% = ₹ 12,00,000
𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
Capital Turnover Ratio = 𝐶𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐸𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑦𝑒𝑑
12,00,000
= 2,00,000
= 6 times
Solution 38:
(i) Return on total assets
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 (1−𝑇) ₹ 2.30 𝐶𝑟𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 (1−0.3)
Return on total assets= 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 (𝐹𝐴 + 𝐶𝐴)
= ₹ 5.20 𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 + ₹ 7.80 𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠
₹ 1.61 𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠
= ₹ 13 𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠
= 0.1238 or 12.38%
Solution 39:
Working Notes :
𝐹𝑖𝑥𝑒𝑑 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 1
(i) Calculation of Sales = 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
= 3
26,00,000 x 3 = 1 x sales = Sales = ₹ 78,00,000
26,00,000 13
𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
= 11
= Current Assets = ₹ 22,00,000
22,00,000
𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐿𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠
=2
𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑠
78,00,000
x 365 = 60 = Receivables = ₹ 12,82,191.78 or ₹ 12,82,192
1
= 15,00,000 x 5
= ₹ 3,00,000
4
Reserve and Surplus = 15,00,000 x 5
= ₹ 12,00,000
Profit and Loss Account of PQR Ltd , for the year ended 31st March , 2020
Particulars ₹ Particulars ₹
To Direct Materials 13,26,000 By Sales 78,00,000
To Direct Wages 6,63,000
To Works (Overhead) Balancing Figure 46,41,000
To Gross Profit c/d (15% of Sales) 11,70,000 -
78,00,000 78,00,000
To Selling and Distribution Expenses 5,46,000 By Gross Profit b/d 11,70,000
(balancing figures)
To Net Profit (8% of sales) 6,24,000 -
11,70,000 11,70,000
Solution 40:
Ratios 2018 2019 2020
Current ratio 1.19 1.25 1.20
Acid test ratio 0.43 0.46 0.40
Average collection period 18 22 27
Inventory turnover NA* 8.2 6.1
Total debt to net worth 1.38 1.40 1.61
Long term debt to total 0.33 0.32 0.32
capitalization
Gross profit margin 0.200 0.163 0.132
Net profit margin 0.075 0.047 0.026
Assets turnover 2.80 2.76 2.24
Return on Assets 0.21 0.13 0.06
Analysis : The company’s profitability has declined steadily over the period . As only ₹ 50,000 is added to
retained earnings , the company must be paying substantial dividends . Receivables are growing slower ,
although the average collection period is still very reasonable relative to the terms given . Inventory turnover is
slowing as well , indicating a relative build-up in inventories . The increase in receivables and inventories ,
coupled with the fact that net worth has increased very little , has resulted in total debt – to – worth ratio
increasing to what would have to be regarded on an absolute basis as a high level.
The current and acid – test ratios have fluctuated , but the current ratio is not particularly inspiring . The lack of
deterioration in these ratio is clouded by the relative build up in both receivables and inventories , evidencing
deterioration in the liquidity of these two assets. Both the gross profit and net profit margins have declined
substantially. The relationship between the two suggests that the company has reduced the relative expenses
in 2019 in particular. The build up in inventories and receivables has resulted in a decline in asset turnover ratio
, and this, coupled with the decline in profitability , has resulted in a sharp decrease in the return on assets
ratio.
Solution 41:
Ratios Navya Ltd. Industry
Norms
1. Current Ratio =
𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 52,80,000
= 2.67 2.50
𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐿𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠 19,80,000
4. Total debt to total assets ratio suggest that , the firm is geared at lower level and debt are used to Asset.
Solution 42:
(i) Calculation of Shareholders’ Fund:
𝑅𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒 & 𝑆𝑢𝑟𝑝𝑙𝑢𝑠
𝑆ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒ℎ𝑜𝑙𝑑𝑒𝑟'𝑠 𝐹𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑠
= 0.5
Solution 43:
1. Working Notes:
𝐹𝑖𝑥𝑒𝑑 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠 1
𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
=3
1,30,00,000 1
𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
= 3
⇒ Sales = ₹ 3,90,00,000
1,30,00,000 13
𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
= 11
⇒ Current Assets = ₹ 1,10,00,000
4
Reserves and Surplus = ₹75,00,000 × 5
=₹ 60,00,000
Profit and Loss Statement of ASD Ltd. for the year ended31st March, 2022
Particulars (₹) Particulars (₹)
To Direct Materials consumed 66,30,000 By Sales
To Direct Wages 33,15,000
3,90,00,000
To Works (Overhead) (Bal. fig.) 2,32,05,000
To Gross Profit c/d (15% of Sales) 58,50,000
3,90,00,000 3,90,00,000
Selling and Distribution Expenses
To 27,30,000 By Gross Profit b/d
(Bal. fig.) 58,50,000
To Net Profit (8% of Sales) 31,20,000
58,50,000 58,50,000
Solution 44:
Liabilities (₹) Assets (₹)
Equity Share Capital 12,50,000 Fixed Assets (cost) 20,58,000
Reserves & Surplus 2,50,000 Less: Acc. Depreciation (3,43,000)
Long Term Loans 6,75,000 Fixed Assets (WDV) 17,15,000
Bank Overdraft 60,000 Stock 2,30,000
Payables 4,00,000 Receivables 2,62,500
Cash 4,27,500
Total 26,35,000 Total 26,35,000
Working Notes:
(i) Sales ₹ 21,00,000
Less: Gross Profit (20%) ₹ 4,20,000
Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) ₹ 16,80,000
𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑠
(ii) Receivables Turnover Velocity = 𝐶𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
× 12
𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑠
2= ₹21,00,000×75%
× 12
₹21,00,000×75%×2
Average Receivables = 12
Average Receivables = ₹ 2,62,500
𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑘
(iii) Stock Turnover Velocity = 𝐶𝑂𝐺𝑆
× 12
𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑘
Or 1.5 = ₹16,80,000
× 12
₹16,80,000×1.5
Or Average Stock = 12
Or Average Stock = ₹ 2,10,000
𝑂𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑘 + 𝐶𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑘
2
=₹ 2,10, 000
Opening Stock + Closing Stock = ₹ 4,20,000 (1)
Also, Closing Stock-Opening Stock = ₹ 40,000 (2)
Solving (1) and (2), we get closing stock = ₹ 2,30,000
Cash = ₹ 4,27,500
Solution 45:
1. Current Ratio = 3:1
Current Assets (CA)/Current Liability (CL) = 3:1
CA = 3CL
WC = 10,00,000
CA – CL = 10,00,000
3CL – CL = 10,00,000
2CL = 10,00,000
10,00,000
CL = 2
CL = ₹5,00,000
CA = 3 x 5,00,000
CA = ₹15,00,000
2. Acid Test Ratio = CA – Stock / CL = 1:1
15,00,000− 𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑘
= 5,00,000
=1
15,00,000 – stock = 5,00,000
Stock = ₹10,00,000
3. Stock Turnover ratio (on sales) = 5
𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
𝐴𝑣𝑔 𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑘
=5
𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
10,00,000
=5
Sales = ₹50,00,000
4. Gross Profit = 50,00,000 x 40% = ₹20,00,000
Net profit (PBT) = 50,00,000 x 10% = ₹5,00,000
5. PBIT/PBT = 2.2
PBIT = 2.2 x 5,00,000
PBIT= 11,00,000
Interest = 11,00,000 – 5,00,000 = ₹6,00,000
6,00,000
Long term loan = 0.12 = ₹50,00,000
6. Average collection period = 30 days
30
Receivables = 360 x 50.00.000 = 4,16,667
7. Fixed Assets Turnover Ratio = 0.8
50,00,000/ Fixed Assets = 0.8
Fixed Assets = ₹62,50,000
Income Statement
Amount (₹)
Sales 50,00,000
Less: Cost of Goods Sold 30,00,000
Gross Profit 20,00,000
Less: Operating Expenses 9,00,000
Less: Interest. 6,00,000
Net Profit 5,00,000
Balance sheet
Liabilities Amount (₹) Assets Amount (₹)
Equity share capital 22,50,000Fixed asset 62,50,000
Long term debt 50,00,000Current assets:
Current liability 5,00,000Stock 10,00,000
Receivables 4,16,667
Other 83,333 15,00,000
77,50,000 77,50,000
Solution 46:
Ratios Comment
Liquidity Current ratio has improved from last year and matching the industry average.
Quick ratio also improved than last year and above the industry average.
The reduced inventory levels (evidenced by higher inventory turnover ratio) have led
to better quick ratio in FY 2022 compared to FY 2021.
Further the decrease in current liabilities is greater than the collective decrease in
inventory and debtors as the current ratio have increase from FY2021 to FY 2022.
Operating Operating Income-ROI reduced from last year, but Operating Profit Margin has been
Profits maintained. This may happen due to decrease in operating cost. However, both the
ratios are still higher than the industry average.
Financing The company has reduced its debt capital by 1% and saved earnings for equity
shareholders. It also signifies that dependency on debt compared to other industry
players (60%) is low.
Return to the Prabhu’s ROE is 26 per cent in 2021 and 28 per cent in 2022 compared to an industry
shareholders average of 18 per cent. The ROE is stable and improved over the last year.
Solution 47:
1. Balance Sheet of Rudra Ltd.
Liabilities (₹) Assets (₹)
Capital 10,00,000 Fixed Assets 30,00,000
Reserves 20,00,000 Current Assets:
Long Term Loan @ 10% 30,00,000 Stock in Trade 20,00,000
Current Liabilities: Debtors 20,00,000
Creditors 10,00,000 Cash 5,00,000
Other Short-term 2,00,000
Current Liability (Other
STCL)
Outstanding Interest 3,00,000
75,00,000 75,00,000
Working Notes:
Let sales be ₹ x
Balance Sheet of Rudra Ltd.
7. Stock /Debtor =1
Debtor = Stock = x/ 6
9. CA = 3CL
= 3 {x/9 +₹ 5,00,000/3}
CA = x/3 +5,00,000
10. Net worth + Long Term Loan + Current Liability = Fixed Asset + Current Assets
{x/4 + x/4 + x/9 + ₹ 5,00,000/3} = {x/4 + x/3+ ₹ 5,00,000}
{x/4 + x/9 – x/3} = {₹ 5,00,000 – ₹ 5,00,000/ 3}
(9x+ 4x –12x)/36 = (₹15,00,000 – ₹ 5,00,000)/3
x /36 = ₹10,00,000/ 3
x = ₹ 1,20,00,000
Cost Of Capital
Solution 4:
Particulars Year 1 (₹) Year 2 (₹) Year 3 (₹) Year 4 (₹)
Principal Outstanding 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000
Principal repaid 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Add: Interest at 12.5% p.a. on Principal
Outstanding = Coupon Payment 2,500 1,875 1,250 625
Total Cash Flows p.a. (A) 7,500 6,875 6,250 5,625
𝑛
(1 + 0. 12) where n = nth year (B) 1.1200 1.2544 1.4049 1.5735
PV of Cash Flows (A)/(B) 6,696 54,811 4,448 3,575
Hence, Present value of Bond = Total of PV of Cash Flows = ₹ 20,200
Solution 5:
The amount of interest for five years will be:
First year ₹ 5,000 × 0.08 = ₹ 400;
Second year (₹ 5,000 – ₹ 1,000) × 0.08 = ₹ 320;
Third year (₹ 4,000 – ₹ 1,000) × 0.08 = ₹ 240;
Fourth year (₹ 3,000 – ₹ 1,000) × 0.08 = ₹ 160; and
Fifth year (₹ 2,000 – ₹ 1,000) × 0.08 = ₹ 80.
The outstanding amount of bond will be zero at the end of fifth year.
Since Reserve Bank of India will have to return ₹ 1,000 every year, the outflows every year will consist of
interest payment and repayment of principal:
First year ₹ 1,000 + ₹ 400 = ₹ 1,400;
Second year ₹ 1,000 + ₹ 320 = ₹ 1320;
Third year ₹ 1,000 + ₹ 240 = ₹ 1,240;
Fourth year ₹ 1000 + ₹ 160 = ₹ 1,160; and
Fifth year ₹ 1000 + ₹ 80 = ₹ 1080.
Solution 8.b.:
Here,
Redemption Value (RV)= ₹1,50,000
Net Proceeds (NP) = ₹ 3,750
Interest = 0
Life of bond = 25 years
There is huge difference between RV and NP therefore in place of approximation method we should use trial &
error method.
FV = PV x (1 + r)n
1,50,000 = 3,750 x (1 + r)25
40 = (1 + r)25
Trial 1: r = 15%, (1.15)25 = 32.919
Trial 2: r = 16%, (1.16)25 = 40.874
Here:
L = 15%; H = 16%
NPVL = 32.919 - 40 = - 7.081
NPVH = 40.874 - 40 = + 0.874
𝑁𝑃𝑉𝐿
IRR = L + 𝑁𝑃𝑉𝐿 − 𝑁𝑃𝑉𝐻
(H-L)
−7.081
= 15% + −7.081 – (0.874)
x (16% -15%) = 15.89%
Solution 8B:
Determination of Redemption value:
Higher of-
(i) The cash value of debentures = ₹ 100
(ii) Value of equity shares = 5 shares × ₹ 20 (1+0.04)5
= 5 shares × ₹ 24.333
= ₹ 121.665 rounded to ₹ 121.67
₹ 121.67 will be taken as redemption value as it is higher than the cash option and attractive to the investors.
Calculation of Cost of 10% Convertible debenture
Year Cash flows Discount factor @ Present Value Discount factor @ Present Value
(₹) 10% 15% (₹)
0 100 1.000 (100.00) 1.000 (100.00)
1 to 5 7.5 3.790 28.425 3.353 25.148
5 121.67 0.621 75.557 0.497 60.470
NPV +3.982 -14.382
𝑁𝑃𝑉𝐿 3.982
IRR = L + 𝑁𝑃𝑉𝐿 − 𝑁𝑃𝑉𝐻
(H – L) = 10% + 3.982 – (− 14.382)
(15% - 10%) = 0.11084 or 11.084% (approx.)
Solution 31:
(i) Calculation of Cost of Convertible Debentures:
Given that,
RF = 10%
Rm – Rf = 18%
Β = 1.25
D0 = 12.76
D-5 = 10
Flotation Cost = 5%
Using CAPM,
Ke = Rf + β (Rm – Rf)
= 10%+1.25 (18%)
= 32.50%
Calculation of growth rate in dividend
12.76 = 10 (1+g)5
1.276 = (1+g)5
(1+5%)5 = 1.276................ from FV Table
g = 5%
7
𝐷7 12.76(1.05)
Price of share after 6 years = 𝑘𝑒−𝑔
= 0.325−0.05
12.76×1.407
P6 = 0.275
P6 = 65.28
Redemption Value of Debenture (RV) = 65.28 × 2 = 130.56 (RV)
NP = 95
n =6
(𝑅𝑉−𝑁𝑃)
𝐼𝑛𝑡(1−𝑡)+
Kd = (𝑅𝑉−𝑁𝑃)
𝑛
× 100
2
(130.56−95)
15(1−0.4)+
= (130.56+95)
6
× 100
2
9+5.93
= 112.78
× 100
Kd = 13.24%
Solution 35:
𝐷1 ₹17.716
1. Cost of Equity (K ) = 𝑃𝑜−𝐹 + 𝑔 = ₹125−₹5
+ 0. 10 *
Ke = 0.2476
*Calculation of g:
₹ 10 (1+g)5 = ₹ 16.105
16.105
Or, (1+g)5 = 10
= 1.6105
Table (FVIF) suggests that ₹ 1 compounds to ₹ 1.6105 in 5 years at the compound rate of 10
percent. Therefore, g is 10 per cent.
𝐷1 ₹17.716
(ii) Cost of Retained Earnings (K ) = 𝑃𝑜
+g = 125
+ 0.10 = 0.2417
𝑃𝐷 ₹15
(iii) Cost of Preference Shares (Kp) = 𝑃𝑜
= ₹105 =0.1429
=
₹15(1−0.30)+ (₹100−₹91.75*
11 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠 )
₹100+₹91.75
2
*Since yield on similar type of debentures is 16 per cent, the company would be required to offer
debentures at discount.
= ₹ 15 ÷ 0.16 = ₹ 93.75
Sale proceeds from debentures = ₹ 93.75 – ₹ 2 (i.e., floatation cost) = ₹91.75
Market value (P0) of debentures can also be found out using the present value method:
P0 = Annual Interest × PVIFA (16%, 11 years) + Redemption value × PVIF (16%, 11 years)
P0 = ₹ 15 × 5.0287 + ₹ 100 × 0.1954
**Market Value of equity has been apportioned in the ratio of Book Value of equity and retained earnings i.e.,
240:60 or 4:1.
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC):
₹86.3262
Using Book Value = ₹390
= 0.2213 or 22.13%
₹110.6536
Using Market Value = ₹488.30
= 0.2266 or 22.66%
Solution 37:
Statement of WACC
Source Amount Weight Cost of Capital WACC
Equity (2,00,000 × 30) ₹ 60,00,000 0.6 17.00% 10.20%
Preference Capital ₹ 10,00,000 0.10 12.00% 1.20%
Debt ₹ 30,00,000 0.30 5.40% 1.62%
Total ₹ 1,00,00,000 1.00 WACC = K0 13.02%
Working Notes:
𝐷𝑃𝑆 ₹3
(1) Revised Ke = 𝑀𝑃𝑆 + g = ₹ 30
+ 7% = 17.00%
(2) Kd = 9% × (100% – 40%) = 5.40%
Solution 40:
Market Value of Equity, E = 5,00,000 × 1.50 = ₹ 7,50,000
Market value of Debt, D = Nil
Cost of Equity Capital, Ke = Dividend/Market value of Share = 27/150 = 0.18
Since there is no Debt Capital, WACC = Ke = 18%
Solution 45:
(a) Cost of Equity / Retained Earnings (using dividend growth model)
𝐷1
Ke = 𝑃𝑜
where D1 = Do (1 + g) = 2 (1 + .10) = 2.2
2.2
Ke = 44 + 0.10 = 0.15 or 15 %
(b) Cost of Debt (Post Tax)
Kd = I (1-t)
Upto 3,60,000 Kd = .08 (1-0.4) = 0.048
Beyond 3,60,000 = .12 (1-0.4) = 0.072
Thus, post-tax cost of additional debt = 0.048 x 3,60,000 / 6,00,000 + 0.072 x 2,40,000/ 6,00,000 = 0.0288 +
0.0288 = 0.0576 or 5.76%
(c) Pattern for Raising Additional Finance
Debt = 20,00,000 x 30% = 6,00,000
Equity = 20,00,000 x 70 % = 14,00,000
Solution 46.
Statement to find WACC
(i) Using Book value weights
Source Amount (in lakhs) Weight Rate WACC
Deb 8,00,000 0.4 3.619% 1.4476%
Preference 2,00,000 0.1 8.474% 0.8474%
Equity 10,00,000 0.5 15% 7.5%
20,00,000 Ko = 9.795%
Working note 1
(𝑅𝑉 – 𝑁𝑃) (100 – 105.6)
𝐼(1 − 𝑡) + 8(1 − 50%) + 3.72
Kd = (𝑅𝑉 + 𝑁𝑃)
𝑛
= (100 + 105.6)
20
= 102.8
= 3.619%
2 2
Working Note 2
(𝑅𝑉 – 𝑁𝑃) (100 – 114)
𝐼(1 − 𝑡) + 10 + 10 − 0.933
Kp = (𝑅𝑉 + 𝑁𝑃)
𝑛
= 15
(100 + 114) = 107
= 8.474%
2 2
Working Note 3
Ke = D1/Po + g
= 2/(22 – 2) + 5%
= 15%
Solution 47:
(i) Weighted Average Cost of Capital of the Company is as follows:
Capital Structure Amount Cost of Capital Weights WACC
Equity Share Capital 40,00,000 15% 0.500 7.50%
11.5% Preference Shares 10,00,000 11.5% 0.125 1.4375%
10% Debentures 30,00,000 6.5% 0.375 2.4375%
80,00,000 1.000 11.375%
Working Notes:
1. Cost of Equity Capital:
𝐷1 ₹2
Ke = 𝑃0
+g= ₹20
+ 5% = 15%
Solution 51:
Calculation of Cost of Equity
(i) D0 = ₹ 5x 60%
D0 = ₹ 3
g = b x r = (1-0.6) x 10% = 4%
𝐷1
Ke= 𝑃𝑜 + 𝑔
3.12
Ke= 20.8
+ 0. 04
Ke= 19%
Solution 55:
(a) (i) After tax cost of new Debt:
𝐼 (1−𝑡) (1−0.3)
Kd= 𝑃
= 15 96
𝐷 (2.50×50%)
K = 𝑃1 + 𝑔 = 25
+ 0. 10
𝑜
= 1.25 x 50,000
= ₹ 62,500
Proportion of equity (Retained earnings here) capital is 80% of total capital. Therefore, ₹ 62,500 is 80% of
total capital.
62,500
Amount of Capital Investment = 0.80
= ₹ 78,125
Solution 63:
(A) (i) Cost of new debt
𝐼(1− 𝑡) ₹ 16(1− 0.3)
Kd = 𝑃𝑜 = ₹ 96
= 0.11667
Calculation of D1
D1 = 50% of 2020 EPS = 50% of ₹ 4.72 = ₹ 2.36
(D) If the company spends in excess of ₹ 29,500, it will have to issue new equity shares at ₹ 40 per
share.
The cost of new issue of equity shares will be:
𝐷1 + 𝑔 ₹ 2.36 + 0.10
Ke = 𝑃𝑜 = ₹ 40
= 0.159
Capital Structure
Solution 1:
Computation of level of earnings before interest and tax (EBIT)
In case alternative (i) is accepted, then the EPS of the firm would be:
(𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 – 𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡) (1 – 𝑡𝑎𝑥 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒) (𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 – 0.14 𝑥 8,00,000) (1 – 0.3)
EPS Alternative (i) = 𝑁𝑜. 𝑜𝑓 𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑆ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠
= 1,20,000 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠
In case the alternative (ii) is accepted, then the EPS of the firm would be
(𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 – 𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡) (1 – 𝑇𝑎𝑥 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒) – 𝑃𝐷
EPS Alternative (ii) = 𝑁𝑜. 𝑜𝑓 𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑆ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠
(𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 – 0.14 𝑥 8,00,000) (1 – 0.3)
= 80,000 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠
– 0.16 x 4,00,000
In order to determine the indifference level of EBIT, the EPS under the two alternative plans should be equated
as follows:
(𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 – 0.14 𝑥 8,00,000)(1− 0.3) (𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 – 0.14 𝑥 8,00,000)(1− 0.3)
1,20,000 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠
= 80,000 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠
– 0.16 x 4,00,000
Solution 2:
(i) Computation of EPS under three-financial plans
Plan I: Equity Financing
(₹ ) (₹) (₹) (₹) (₹ )
EBIT 20,000 40,000 80,000 1,20,000 2,00,000
Interest 0 0 0 0 0
EBT 20,000 40,000 80,000 1,20,000 2,00,000
Less: Tax @ 50% 10,000 20,000 40,000 60,000 1,00,000
PAT 10,000 20,000 40,000 60,000 1,00,000
No. of equity shares 1,00,000 1,00,000 1,00,000 1,00,000 1,00,000
EPS 0.10 0.20 0.40 0.60 1
(ii)From the above EPS computations tables under the three financial plans we can see that when EBIT
is ₹ 80,000 or more, Plan II: Debt-Equity mix is preferable over the Plan I and Plan III, as rate of EPS is
more under this plan. On the other hand an EBIT of less than ₹ 80,000, Plan I: Equity Financing has
higher EPS than Plan II and Plan III. Plan III Preference share Equity mix is not acceptable at any level
of EBIT, as EPS under this plan is lower.
The choice of the financing plan will depend on the performance of the company and other macro economic
conditions. If the company is expected to have higher operating profit Plan II: Debt – Equity Mix is preferable.
Moreover, debt financing gives more benefit due to availability of tax shield.
Solution 3:
Ascertainment of probable price of shares of Prakash limited
Plan-I Plan-II
If ₹ 5,00,000 is raised If ₹ 5,00,000
Particulars as debt is raised by
issuing equity
(₹) Shares (₹)
Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT)
{20% of new capital i.e., 20% of (₹15,00,000 + 4,00,000 4,00,000
₹ 5,00,000)}
(Refer working note1)
Less: Interest on old debentures (10% of ₹5,00,000) (50,000) (50,000)
Less: Interest on new debt (12% of ₹5,00,000) (60,000) --
Earnings Before Tax (EBT) 2,90,000 3,50,000
Less: Tax @ 50% (1,45,000) (1,75,000)
Earnings for equity shareholders (EAT) 1,45,000 1,75,000
No. of Equity Shares (refer working note 2) 25,000 35,000
Earnings per Share (EPS) ₹ 5.80 ₹ 5.00
Price/ Earnings (P/E) Ratio (refer working note 3) 8 10
Probable Price Per Share (PE Ratio × EPS) ₹ 46.40 ₹ 50
Working Notes:
1. Calculation of existing Return of Capital Employed (ROCE):
(₹)
Equity Share capital (25,000 shares × ₹10) 2,50,000
(
10% Debentures ₹50, 000 × 10
100
) 5,00,000
Reserves and Surplus 7,50,000
Total Capital Employed 15,00,000
Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) (given) 3,00,000
₹3,00,000
ROCE = ₹15,00,000 × 100 20%
2. Number of Equity Shares to be issued in Plan-II:
₹5,00,000
= ₹50 = 10,000 Shares
Thus, after the issue total number of shares = 25,000+ 10,000 = 35,000 shares
3. Debt/Equity Ratio if ₹ 5,00,000 is raised as debt:
₹10,00,000
= ₹20,00,000 ×100 = 50%
As the debt equity ratio is more than 40% the P/E ratio will be brought down to 8 in Plan-I
Solution 6:
Particulars Plan I (₹.) Plan II (₹.) Plan III (₹.) Plan IV (₹.)
Equity Share Capital 16,00,000 14,00,000 13,00,000 13,00,000
Solution 11:
(i) Computation of Earnings per Share (EPS)
Plans X (₹) Y (₹) Z (₹)
Earnings before interest & tax (EBIT) 1,00,000 1,00,000 1,00,000
Less: Interest charges (10% of ₹ 2,00,000) -- (20,000) --
Earnings before tax (EBT) 1,00,000 80,000 1,00,000
Less: Tax @ 50% (50,000) (40,000) (50,000)
Earnings after tax (EAT) 50,000 40,000 50,000
Less: Preference share dividend (10% of ₹ 2,00,000) -- -- (20,000)
Earnings available for equity shareholders (A) 50,000 40,000 30,000
No. of equity shares (B) 20,000 10,000 10,000
Plan X = ₹ 4,00,000/ ₹ 20
Plan Y = ₹ 2,00,000 / ₹ 20
Plan Z = ₹ 2,00,000 / ₹ 20
E.P.S (A ¸ B) 2.5 4 3
b. Indifference point where EBIT of proposal ‘X’ and proposal ‘Z’ is equal:
(𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇)(1 – 0.5) 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 (1 – 0.5) – ₹ 20,000
20,000 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠
= 10,000 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠
0.5 EBIT = EBIT- ₹ 40,000
c. Indifference point where EBIT of proposal ‘Y’ and proposal ‘Z’ are equal
(𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 – ₹ 20,000)(1 – 0.5) 𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇(1 – 0.5) – ₹ 20,000
10,000 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠
= 10,000 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠
Solution 12:
(i) Computation of Earnings per share (EPS)
Plans A B C
Earnings before interest and 10,00,000 10,00,000 10,00,000
tax (EBIT)
Less: Interest Charges --- (20,000) ---
(10% x 2 lakh)
Earnings before tax (EBIT) 10,00,000 9,80,000 10,00,000
Less: Tax (@30%) (3,00,000 ) (2,94,000) (3,00,000)
Earnings after tax (EAT) 7,00,000 6,86,000 7,00,000
Less: Preference Dividend --- --- (20,000)
(10% x ₹ 2 Lakh)
Earnings available for equity 7,00,000 6,86,000 6,80,000
shareholders (A)
No. of Equity Shares (B) 20,000 10,000 10,000
(₹ 4 lakh ÷ ₹ 20) (₹ 2 lakh ÷ ₹ 20) (₹ 2 lakh ÷ ₹ 20)
EPS ₹ [(A) ÷ (B)] 35 68.6 68
Plan B: Under this plan, there is an interest payment of ₹ 20,000 and no preference dividend. Hence, the
Financial Break-even point will be ₹ 20,000 (Interest charges)
Plan C: Under this plan, there is no interest payment but an after tax preference dividend of ₹ 20,000 is paid.
Hence, the Financial Break – even point will be before tax earnings of ₹ 28,571 (i.e. ₹ 20,000 ÷ 0.7)
Where,
EBIT = Earnings before Interest and tax.
I1 = Fixed charges (interest or pref. dividend) under Alternative 1
I2 = Fixed charges (interest or pref. dividend) under Alternative 2
T = Tax rate
E1 = No. of equity shares in Alternative 1
E2 = No. of equity shares in Alternative 2
(c) Indifference point where EBIT of Plan B and Plan C are equal
(𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 – 20,000) (1 – 0.3)
(𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇 – 0) (1 – 0.3)
10,000
= 10,000
– 20,000
Solution 16:
1. Profitability statement under different Plans
Plan I: Issue of 3,12,500 Equity shares at ₹. 10
Situation A B C D E
EBIT ₹. 62,500 ₹. 1,25,000 ₹. 2,50,000 ₹. 3,75,000 ₹. 6,25,000
Less: Interest on debentures Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
EBT ₹. 62,500 ₹. 1,25,000 ₹. 2,50,000 ₹. 3,75,000 ₹. 6,25,000
Less: Tax at 40% (₹. 25,000) (₹. 50,000) (₹.1,00,000) (₹.1,50,000) (₹. 2,50,000)
EAT ₹. 37,500 ₹. 75,000 ₹. 1,50,000 ₹. 2,25,000 ₹. 3,75,000
Less: Preference Dividend Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
Residual Earnings ₹. 37,500 ₹. 75,000 ₹. 1,50,000 ₹. 2,25,000 ₹. 3,75,000
No. of Equity shares 3,12,500 3,12,500 3,12,500 3,12,500 3,12,500
𝑅𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝐸𝑎𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠
EPS = 𝑁𝑜.𝑜𝑓 𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑆ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 ₹. 0.12 ₹. 0.24 ₹. 0.48 ₹. 0.72 ₹. 1.20
Plan II: Issue of 1,56,250 equity Shares at ₹. 10 and ₹. 15,625 8% Debentures of ₹. 100
Situation A B C D E
EBIT ₹. 62,500 ₹. 1,25,000 ₹. 2,50,000 ₹. 3,75,000 ₹. 6,25,000
Less: Interest on
debentures (₹. 1,25,000) (₹. 1,25,000) (₹. 1,25,000) (₹. 1,25,000) (₹. 1,25,000)
EBT (₹. 62,500) Nil ₹. 1,25,000 ₹. 2,50,000 ₹. 5,00,000
Add: Tax Savings ₹. 25,000 - - - -
Less: Tax at 40% - Nil (₹. 50,000) (₹. 1,00,000) (₹. 2,00,000)
EAT (₹. 37,500) Nil ₹. 75,000 ₹. 1,50,000 ₹. 3,00,000
Less: Preference
Dividend Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
Residual
Earnings (₹. 37,500) Nil ₹. 75,000 ₹. 1,50,000 ₹. 3,00,000
No. of Equity
shares 1,56,250 1,56,250 1,56,250 1,56,250 1,56,250
EPS =
𝑅𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝐸𝑎𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠
𝑁𝑜.𝑜𝑓 𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑆ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 (₹. 0.24) Nil ₹. 0.48 ₹. 0.96 ₹. 1.92
Plan III: Issue of 1,56,250 Equity Shares at ₹. 10 and 15,625 8% Preference shares of ₹. 100
Situation A B C D E
EBIT ₹. 62,500 ₹. 1,25,000 ₹. 2,50,000 ₹. 3,75,000 ₹. 6,25,000
Less: Interest on
debentures (Nil) (Nil) (Nil) (Nil) (Nil)
EBT ₹. 62,500 ₹. 1,25,000 ₹. 2,50,000 ₹. 3,75,000 ₹. 6,25,000
Less: Tax at 40% (₹. 25,000) (₹. 50,000) (₹. 1,00,000) (₹. 1,50,000) (₹. 2,50,000)
EAT ₹. 37,500 ₹. 75,000 ₹. 1,50,000 ₹. 2,25,000 ₹. 3,75,000
Less: Preference
Dividend (₹. 1,25,000) (₹. 1,25,000) (₹. 1,25,000) (₹. 1,25,000) (₹. 1,25,000)
Residual
Earnings ₹. 87,500 ₹. 50,000 ₹. 25,000 ₹. 1,00,000 ₹. 2,50,000
No. of Equity
shares 1,56,250 1,56,250 1,56,250 1,56,250 1,56,250
EPS =
𝑅𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝐸𝑎𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠
𝑁𝑜.𝑜𝑓 𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑆ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 (₹. 0.56) (₹. 0.32) ₹. 0.16 ₹. 0.64 ₹. 1.60
2. Recommendation: In order to maximise EPS, the optimal financing plan will be as under:
Situation A B C D E
EBIT ₹. 62,500 ₹. 1,25,000 ₹. 2,50,000 ₹. 3,75,000 ₹. 6,25,000
Financing plan to be selected I I I or II II II
Maximum EPS ₹. 0.12 ₹. 0.24 ₹. 0.48 ₹. 0.96 ₹. 1.92
3. Computation of EBIT – EPS Indifference Point (i.e. same EPS under two alternatives)
(a) Plan I and II
For equal EPS, Let the required EBIT be ₹. A
𝐴 × (1−0.40)
Plan I EPS = 3,12,500 𝑆ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠
(𝐴−1,25,000)× (1−0.40)
Plan II EPS = 1,56,250 𝑆ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠
0.6 𝐴 0.6 𝐴−75,000
3,12,500
= 1,56,250
0.6 A = 1.2 A – 1,50,000
A = ₹. 2,50,000
EBIT should be ₹. 2,50,000
Solution 17.
Income statement
Particulars I(Deb) II(Equity)
Equity 50,00,000 50,00,000
New Equity - 25,00,000
New Debt @ 8% 25,00,000 -
At indifference point
(EBIT – I1)(1-t) – PD1/n1 = (EBIT – I2) (1-t) – PD2
(EBIT – 2,00,000) (1 – 50%)/5,00,000 = (EBIT – 0) (1 – 50%) – 0/7,50,000
0.5 EBIT – 1,00,000/ 50 = 0.5 EBIT/75
3.75 EBIT – 75,00,000 = 25 EBIT
12.5 EBIT = 75,00,000
EBIT = ₹ 6,00,000
Income Statement
I II
Uncommitted EPS means EPS which is obtained after keeping sinking fund amount of each year. Sinking fund
is applicable only in that option where debentures are present. (Not only in equity option)
Uncommitted EPS = (EBIT – I1)(1 – t) – PD – Sinking Fund/n1
Solution 21:
Let the EBIT at the Indifference Point level be ₹. E (Amounts In ₹.)
Particulars Alternative 1 Alternative 2
Description ₹. 50 ESC = ₹. 5,00,000 9% Debt = ₹. 5,00,000
EBIT E E
Less: Interest at 9% of ₹. 5,00,000 (Nil) (45,000)
EBT E E
Less: Tax at 40% (0.5 E) (0.5 E – 22,500)
EAT 0.5 E 0.5 E – 22,500
Less: Preference Dividend (Nil) (Nil)
EAT 0.5 E 0.5 E – 22,500
No. of ₹. 50 equity shares(Present 20,000 +
Additional 10,000) 30,000 Shares 20,000 shares
𝐸𝐴𝑇 0.5 𝐸 0.5 𝐸−22,500
EPS = 𝑁𝑜.𝑜𝑓 𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑆ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 30,000 𝑆ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 20,000 𝑆ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠
For indifference between the above alternatives, EPS should be equal.
0.5𝐸 0.5 𝐸−22,500
30,000
= 20,000
1E = 1.5 E – 67,500
0.5 E = 67,500
67,500
E = 0.5 = ₹. 1,35,000
Required EBIT = ₹ 1,35,000 and EPS = ₹ 2.25
Solution 23:
Firm A B C D
EBIT ₹. 2,00,000 ₹. 3,00,000 ₹. 5,00,000 ₹. 6,00,000
Less: Interest (₹. 20,000) (₹. 60,000) (₹. 2,00,000) (₹. 2,40,000)
EBT (Net Income) ₹. 1,80,000 ₹. 2,40,000 ₹. 3,00,000 ₹. 3,60,000
Ke 12.00% 16.00% 15.00% 18.00%
When Firm A borrow ₹ 2 Lakhs at 10% interest rate, to repay equity capital, the effect on WACC will be as
under:
Firm A B
EBIT ₹. 2,00,000 ₹. 2,00,000
Less: Interest (₹. 20,000) (₹. 40,000)
EBT (Net Income) ₹. 1,80,000 ₹. 1,60,000
Ke 12.00% 12.00%
Value of Equity VE =EBT/Ke ₹. 15,00,000 ₹. 13,33,333
Value of Debt VD = Interest/kd ₹. 2,00,000 ₹. 4,00,000
Value of Firm VP = VE + VD ₹. 17,00,000 ₹. 17,33,333
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
KO = WACC = 𝑉𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝐹𝑖𝑟𝑚 11.76% 11.54%
Under Net Income Approach, Increase in Debt leads to increase in value of firm and decrease in WACC.
Solution 27:
Particulars Amount (₹.)
EBIT 9,00,000
Less: Interest (10% × 30,00,000) (3,00,000)
EBT 6,00,000
𝐸𝐵𝐼𝑇
Value of Firm = 𝐾0
9,00,000
= 0.12
= 75,00,000
Solution 33:
𝑁𝑂𝐼 ₹ 4,50,000
(a) Value of A Ltd. = 𝐾𝑜
= 18%
= ₹ 25,00,000
₹ 3,30,000
(ii) Implied required rate of return on equity of A Ltd. = ₹ 10,00,000
= 33 %
₹ 4,10,000
Implied required rate of return on equity = ₹ 20,00,000
= 20.5%
(iii) Implied required rate of return on equity of B Ltd. is lower than that of A Ltd. because B Ltd. uses less
debt in its capital structure. As the equity capitalization is a linear function of the debt-to-equity ratio
when we use the net operating income approach, the decline in required equity return offsets exactly
the disadvantage of not employing so much in the way of “cheaper” debt funds.
Solution 34:
1. Valuation of firms:
Particulars Levered company (₹.) Unlevered company (₹.)
EBIT 30,000 30,000
Less: Interest 10,000 Nil
Earnings available to equity shareholders / Ke 20,000 30,000
12.5% 12.5%
Value of equity 1,60,000 2,40,000
Debt 1,00,000 Nil
Value of Firm 2,60,000 2,40,000
Value of Levered company is more than that of unlevered company therefore investor will sell his shares in
levered company and buy shares in unlevered company. To maintain the level of risk he will borrow
proportionate amount and invest that amount also in shares of unlevered company.
3. Change in Return
Particulars Amount (₹.)
Income from shares in unlevered company (39,000 x 12.5%) 4,875
Less: Interest on loan (15,000 x 10%) (1,500)
Net income from unlevered firm 3,375
Income from levered firm (24,000 x 12.5%) (3,000)
Incremental income due to Arbitrage 375
Solution 35:
Here we are assuming that MM Approach 1958: Without tax, where capital structure has no relevance with the
value of company and accordingly overall cost of capital of both levered as well as unlevered company is
same. Therefore, the two companies should have similar WACCs. Because Samsui Limited is all-equity
financed, its WACC is the same as its cost of equity finance, i.e. 16 per cent. It follows that Sanghmani Limited
should have WACC equal to 16 per cent also.
Therefore, Cost of equity in Sanghmani Ltd. (levered company) will be calculated as follows:
2 1
K0 = 3 x Ke + 3 x Kd = 16% (i.e. equal to WACC of Samsui Ltd.)
2 1
Or, 16% = 3
x Ke + 3
x 10% Or, Ke = 19
Solution 36:
1. Valuation of firms:
Particulars Levered company (₹.) Unlevered company (₹.)
Value of Unlevered company is more than that of Levered company therefore investor will sell his shares in
unlevered company and buy shares in levered company. Market value of Debt and Equity of Levered company
are in the ratio of ₹.1,00,000 : ₹.1,00,000, i.e., 1:1. To maintain the level of risk he will lend proportionate
amount (50%) and invest balance amount (50%) in shares of Levered company.
3. Change in Return
Particulars Amount (₹.)
Income from shares in levered company (18,000 x 20%) 3,600
Add: Interest on money lent (18,000 x 10%) 1,800
Total income after switch over 5,400
Income from unlevered firm (36,000 x 12.5%) (4,500)
Incremental income due to Arbitrage 900
Solution 41:
Constant Ko means the use of NOI or M&M Approach, Ke = Ko + Risk Premium.
𝐷𝑒𝑏𝑡
From M & M Approach, Ke = Ko + 𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦 (Ko – kd) = 12% + [80% × (12% – 9%) = 14.40%
Solution 42:
(a) Computation of Market Value, Cost of Equity and WACC of RES Ltd.
(iii) WACC
Cost of Debt (after tax) = 15% (1-0.3) = 0.15 (0.70) = 0.105 = 10.5%
Components of Costs Amount Cost of Capital Weight Weighted COC
Equity 21,50,000 0.22 0.81 0.178
Debt 5,00,000 0.105 0.19 0.020
26,50,000 0.198
WACC = 19.8%
Comment: At present the company is all equity financed. So, Ke = Ko i.e. 21%. However after restructuring, the
Ko would be reduced to 19.81% and Ke would increase from 21% to 21.98%. Reduction in Ko and increase in
Ke is good for the health of the company.
Solution 43:
(a) Amount of debt to be employed by firm as per traditional approach
Calculation of Equity, Wd and We
Total Capital (₹) Debt (₹) Wd Equity value (₹) We
(a) (b) (b)/(a) (c) = (a) - (b) (c)/(a)
50,00,000 0 - 50,00,000 1.0
50,00,000 5,00,000 0.1 45,00,000 0.9
50,00,000 10,00,000 0.2 40,00,000 0.8
50,00,000 15,00,000 0.3 35,00,000 0.7
50,00,000 20,00,000 0.4 30,00,000 0.6
50,00,000 25,00,000 0.5 25,00,000 0.5
50,00,000 30,00,000 0.6 20,00,000 0.4
(b) As per MM approach, cost of the capital (Ko) remains constant and cost of equity increases linearly with
debt.
𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒 (𝑁𝑂𝐼)
Value of a firm = 𝐾𝑜
₹ 5,00,000
₹ 50,00,000 = 𝐾𝑜
₹ 5,00,000
Ko = ₹ 50,00,000
= 10%
Statement of Equity Capitalization rate (ke) under MM approach
Debt Equity (₹) Debt / Ko Kd Ko - Kd Ke = Ko +(Ko – Kd)
(₹) Equity *Debt/Equity
(1) (2) (3) = (1)/(2) (4) (5) (6) = (4) (7) = (4) +
-(5) (6) x (3)
0 50,00,000 0 0.10 - 0.100 0.100
5,00,000 45,00,000 0.11 0.10 0.060 0.040 0.104
10,00,000 40,00,000 0.25 0.10 0.060 0.040 0.110
15,00,000 35,00,000 0.43 0.10 0.062 0.038 0.116
20,00,000 30,00,000 0.67 0.10 0.070 0.030 0.120
25,00,000 25,00,000 1.00 0.10 0.075 0.025 0.125
30,00,000 20,00,000 1.50 0.10 0.080 0.020 0.130
Solution 44:
Note that the ration given in this question is not debt to equity ratio. Rather than it is the debt to value ratio.
Therefore, if the ratio is 0.6, it means that capital employed comprises 60% debt and 40% equity.
𝐾𝑑 𝑥 𝐷𝑥+𝐾𝑒 𝑥 𝑆
Ko = 𝐷+𝑆
In this question total of weight is equal to 1 in all cases, hence we need not to divide by it.
1) K0 = 11% x 0 + 13% x 1 = 13%
2) K0 = 11% x 0.1 + 13% x 0.9 = 12.8%
3) K0 = 11.6% x 0.2 + 14% x 0.8 = 13.52%
4) K0 = 12% x 0.3 + 15% x 0.7 = 14.1%
5) K0 = 13% x 0.4 + 16% x 0.6 = 14.8%
6) K0 = 15% x 0.5 + 18% x 0.5 = 16.5%
7) K0 = 18% x 0.6 + 20% x 0.4 = 18.8%
Solution 45:
Alternative 1 = Raising Debt of ₹5 lakh + Equity of ₹15 lakh
Alternative 2 = Raising Debt of ₹10 lakh + Equity of ₹10 lakh
Alternative 3 = Raising Debt of ₹14 lakh + Equity of ₹6 lakh
Calculation of Earnings per share (EPS)
FINANCIAL ALTERNATIVES
Particulars Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3
(₹) (₹) (₹)
Expected EBIT [W. N. (a)] 19,50,000 19,50,000 19,50,000
Less: Interest [W. N. (b)] (50,000) (1,25,000) (2,05,000)
Earnings before taxes (EBT) 19,00,000 18,25,000 17,45,000
Less: Taxes @ 40% 7,60,000 7,30,000 6,98,000
Earnings after taxes (EAT) 11,40,000 10,95,000 10,47,000
Number of shares [W. N. (d)] 1,07,500 1,05,000 1,03,000
Earnings per share (EPS) 10.60 10.43 10.17
Conclusion: Alternative 1 (i.e. Raising Debt of ₹5 lakh and Equity of ₹15 lakh) is recommended which
maximises the earnings per share.
Solution 46:
The following are the costs and values for the firms A and B
Particulars A B
Equilibrium value (₹) 55,005.50 55,005.50
Less: Value of Debt - 30,000
Value of Equity 55,005.50 25,005.50
(OR)
Solution 47:
1. Ascertainment of probable price of shares
Plan (ii) (If ₹ 4,00,000
Plan (i) (If ₹ 4,00,000 is
Particulars is raised by issuing
raised as debt) (₹)
equity shares) (₹)
Earnings Before Interest (EBIT) 20% on (14,00,000 +
3,60,000 3,60,000
4,00,000)
Less: Interest on old debentures @ 10% on 4,00,000 40,000 40,000
3,20,000 3,20,000
Less: Interest on New debt @ 12% on ₹ 4,00,000 48,000 -
Earnings Before Tax (After interest) 2,72,000 3,20,000
Less: Tax @ 50% 1,36,000 1,60,000
Earnings for equity shareholders (EAIT) 1,36,000 1,60,000
Number of Equity Shares (in numbers) 30,000 40,000
Earnings per Share (EPS) 4.53 4
Price/ Earnings Ratio 8 10
Probable Price Per Share 36.24 (8 x 4.53) 40 (10 x 4)
Working Notes:
(₹)
1. Calculation of Present Rate of Earnings
Equity Share capital (30,000 x ₹ 10) 3,00,000
(
10% Debentures 40, 000 × 10
100
) 4,00,000
Reserves (given) 7,00,000
14,00,000
Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) given 2,80,000
Rate of Present Earnings = ( 2,80,000
14,00,000
× 100) 20%
2. Number of Equity Shares to be issued in Plan ( 4,00,000
40 ) 10,000
30,000 + 10,000
Thus, after the issue total number of shares
= 40,000
3. Debt/Equity Ratio if ₹ 4,00,000 is raised as debt: ( 8,00,000
18,00,000 )
× 100 = 44.44%
As the debt equity ratio is more than 32% the P/E ratio shall be 8 in plan (i)
Solution 48:
Current Capital Structure
Equity Share Capital ₹ 20 x 7 lakhs ₹ 1,40,00,000
Reserves ₹ 10,00,000
9% Bonds ₹ 3,00,00,000
11% Preference Share Capital ₹ 50 x 3 lakhs ₹ 1,50,00,000
Total Capital Employed ₹ 6,00,00,000
Solution 49:
Calculation of Equity Share capital and Reserves and surplus:
Alternative 1:
Equity Share capital = ₹20,00,000 + =₹21,50,000
Reserves= ₹10,00,000 +=₹10,50,000
Alternative 2:
Equity Share capital = ₹ 20,00,000 + =₹27,20,000
Reserves= ₹10,00,000 +=₹11,80,000
Capital Structure Plans
Amount in ₹
Capital Alternative 1 Alternative 2
Equity Share capital 21,50,000 27,20,000
Reserves and surplus 10,50,000 11,80,000
10% long term debt 15,00,000 15,00,000
14% Debentures 8,00,000 -
8% Irredeemable Debentures - 1,00,000
Total Capital Employed 55,00,000 55,00,000
Working Note 1
Alternative I Alternative II
Debt:
₹15,00,000 +₹8,00,000 23,00,000 -
₹15,00,000 +₹1,00,000 - 16,00,000
Total capital Employed (₹) 55,00,000 55,00,000
Debt Ratio (Debt/Capital employed) =0.4182 =0.2909
=41.82% =29.09%
Change in Equity: ₹21,50,000-₹20,00,000 1,50,000
₹27,20,000-₹20,00,000 7,20,000
Percentage change in equity 7.5% 36%
Applicable P/E ratio 7 8.5
Summary of solution:
Alternate I Alternate II
Earning per share (EPS) 22.60 20.74
Market price per share (MPS) 158.20 176.29
Financial leverage 1.4043 1.2101
Weighted Average cost of capital (WACC) 9.12% 7.66%
Marginal cost of capital (MACC) 10.65% 7.58%
Alternative 1 of financing will be preferred under the criteria of EPS, whereas Alternative II of financing will
be preferred under the criteria of MPS, Financial leverage, WACC and marginal cost of capital.
Solution 1:
Particulars Amount (₹)
Profit Before Tax 3,00,000
Less: Tax @ 50% 1,50,000
Profit after tax 1,50,000
Add: Depreciation written off 2,50,000
Total cash inflow 4,00,000
₹ 20,00,000
Payback period = ₹ 4,00,000
= 5 years
Solution 3:
₹4,000 ×100
Payback Reciprocal = ₹20,000
= 20%
Solution 4:
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑡/𝑁𝑜.𝑜𝑓 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠
(a) If Initial Investment is considered then, 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡/𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡
× 100
92,000
= 10,00,000 × 100 = 9.2%
92,000
(b) If Average Investment is considered, then, 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡
× 100
92,000
= 5,40,000 × 100 = 17%
Working Notes:
Average Investment = Salvage value + ½ (Initial investment – Salvage value)
= ₹ 80,000 + ½ (₹ 10,00,000 – ₹ 80,000)
= ₹ 80,000 + ₹ 4,60,000 = ₹ 5,40,000
Solution 5:
The ARR can be computed by following methods as follows:
(a) Version 1: Annual Basis
𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑓𝑡𝑒𝑟𝐷𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
ARR = 𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟
Year
1 80,000
= 26.67%
3,00,000
2 80,000
= 34.78%
2,30,000
3 80,000
= 50%
1,60,000
26.67% + 34.78% + 50.00%
Average ARR = 3
= 37.15%
Further, it is important to note that project may also require additional working capital during its life in addition
to initial working capital. In such situation formula for the calculation of average investment shall be modified
as follows:
½(Initial Investment – Salvage Value) + Salvage Value+ Additional Working Capital
Continuing above example, suppose a sum of ₹45,000 is required as additional working capital during the
project life then average investment shall be:
= ½ (₹3,00,000 – ₹90,000) + ₹90,000 + ₹45,000 = ₹2,40,000 and
80,000
ARR = 2,40,000 x 100 = 33.33%
Some organizations prefer the initial investment because it is objectively determined and is not influenced by
either the choice of the depreciation method or the estimation of the salvage value. Either of these amounts is
used in practice but it is important that the same method be used for all investments under consideration.
Solution 7:
Calculation of Net Present Value(In ₹)
Period Present Value Factor Project A Project B Project C Project D
1 0.893 44,650 35,720 66,975 66,975
2 0.797 39,850 39,850 59,775 59,775
3 0.712 35,600 49,840 42,720 42,720
4 0.636 31,800 47,700 50,880 25,440
5 0.567 28,350 42,525 56,700 11,340
Present value of cash inflows 1,80,250 2,15,635 2,77,050 2,06,250
Less: Initial Investment 2,00,000 1,90,000 2,50,000 2,10,000
Net present value (19,750) 25,635 27,050 (3,750)
Solution 8:
Calculation of Net Present Value
Year Net Cash Flow (₹) P.V. Factor Present Value (₹)
0 (1,00,000) 1.000 (1,00,000)
1 6,500 0.909 5,909
2 26,500 0.826 21,889
3 41,500 0.751 31,167
4 41,500 0.683 28,345
5 71,500 0.621 44,402
Net Present Value = 31,712
Working Notes:
Calculation of Net Flows
Contribution = (3.00 – 1.75) × 50,000 = ₹ 62,500
Fixed costs = 40,000 – (1,25,000 – 30,000)/5 = ₹ 21,000
Year Capital (₹) Contribution (₹) Fixed costs (₹) Adverts (₹) Net cash flow (₹)
0 (1,00,000) (1,00,000)
1 (25,000) 62,500 (21,000) (10,000) 6,500
2 62,500 (21,000) (15,000) 26,500
3 62,500 (21,000) 41,500
4 62,500 (21,000) 41,500
5 30,000 62,500 (21,000) 71,500
Solution 9:
The desirability factors for the three projects would be as follows:
₹6,50,000
1. ₹5,50,000 = 1.18
₹95,000
2. ₹75,000
=1.27
₹1,00,30,000
3. ₹1,00,20,000
= 1.001
Solution 10:
Determination of Cash inflows
Elements (₹)
Sales Revenue 45,00,000
Solution 11:
Calculation of IRR
The ‘Factor’ must be found out, ‘the factor reflects the same relationship of investment and cash inflows as in
case of payback calculations’:
𝐼
F= 𝐶
Where, F = Factor to be located
I = Original Investment
C = Average cash inflow per year
For the project,
₹ 1,36,000
Factor = ₹ 36,000 = 3.78
The factor thus calculated will be located in present value of Re. 1 received annually for N year’s table
corresponding to the estimated useful of the asset. This would give the expected rate of return to be applied
for discounting the cash inflows.
In case of the project, the rate comes to 10%.
Year Cash Inflows (₹) Discounting Factor at 10% Present Value (₹)
1 30,000 0.909 27,270
2 40,000 0.826 33,040
3 60,000 0.751 45,060
4 30,000 0.683 20,490
5 20,000 0.621 12,420
Total Present Value 1,38,280
The present value at 10% comes to ₹ 1,38,280, which is more than the initial investment. Therefore, a higher
discount rate is suggested, say, 12%.
Year Cash Inflows(₹) Discounting Factor at 12% Present Value (₹)
1 30,000 0.893 26,790
Solution 12:
Computation of cash inflow per annum
Particulars ₹
Net operating income per annum 68,000
Less: Tax @ 45% 30,600
Profit after tax 37,400
Add: Depreciation (₹ 3,60, 000/5 years) 72,000
Cash inflow 1,09,400
The IRR of the investment can be found as follows:
NPV = -₹ 3,60,000 + ₹ 1,09,400 (PVAF5,r) = 0
₹3,60,000
Or PVA F5r (Cumulative factor) = ₹1,09,400 = 3.29
Computation of internal Rate of Return
Discounting Rate 15% 16%
Cumulative factor 3.35 3.27
Total NPV (₹) 3,66,490 3,57,738
(₹ 109,400 × 3.35) (₹ 1,09,400 × 3.27)
Internal outlay (₹) 3,60,000 3,60,000
Surplus (Deficit)(₹) 6,490 (2,262)
6490
IRR = 15 + ( 6490+2262 ) = 15 + 0.74= 15.74%.
Solution 13:
1. Conversion of Cash Flows into Terminal Value
Year CFAT Reinvestment Factor at 8% Terminal Value at 8%
1 30,000 (1 + 0.08)4 = 1.3605 40,815
2 40,000 (1 + 0.08)3 = 1.2597 50,388
3 60,000 (1 + 0.08)2 = 1.1664 69,984
4 30,000 (1 + 0.08)1 = 1.0800 32,400
5 20,000 (1 + 0.08)0= 1.0000 20,000
Total 2,13,587
2. Computation of MIRR
P (1 + R)n = A,
Where P = Initial Investment = ₹ 1,36,000, A = Terminal Value of Inflows = ₹ 2,13,587
N = Number of years of Project Life = 5, R = MIRR (to be calculated)
∴1,36,000 (1 + R)5 = 2,13,587.
2,13,587
Hence, (1 + R)5 = 1,36,000 = 1.5705
From the FV Tables, (1 + R) = 1.57051/5 = 1.09448.
So, R = 0.09448. Hence, MIRR = 9.448%
Solution 16:
1. Computation of ARR
𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡 𝑎𝑓𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑇𝑎𝑥
Average Rate of Return = 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑦𝑒𝑑
(40,000+30,000 +20,000+10,000+10,000)/5
= (2,50,000+40,000)/2
22,000
= 1,45,000
× 100 = 15.17%
Solution 18:
(a) & (b) Calculation of Computation of NPV (In ₹)
Particulars Years Amount PV Factor @ 15% PV PV Factor @ 10% PV
Outflows
Initial
Investment 0 7,00,000 1 7,00,000 1 7,00,000
Further
Investment 1 10,00,000 0.869 8,69,000 0.909 9,09,000
PVCO (A) 15,69,000 16,09,000
Inflows
CFAT 2 2,50,000 0.756 1,89,000 0.826 2,06,500
3 3,00,000 0.657 1,97,100 0.751 2,25,300
4 3,50,000 0.572 2,00,200 0.683 2,39,050
5 - 10 4,00,000 2.164 8,65,600 2.975 11,90,000
PVCI (B) 14,51,900 18,60,850
NPV (A) – (B) (1,17,100) 2,51,850
Advice: When PV factor is @ 15% than NPV is negative, Proposal cannot be accepted. When PV factor is @
10% then NPV is positive, Proposal should be accepted.
Solution 19:
(i) Calculation of Pay-back Period
Cash Outlay of the Project = ₹. 1,60,00,000
Total Cash Inflow for the first five years = ₹. 1,40,00,000 .
Balance of cash outlay left to be paid back in the 6th year ₹. 20,00,000 .
Cash inflow for 6th year = ₹. 32,00,000
So the payback period is between 5th and 6th years, i.e.,
₹. 20,00,000
5 years + ₹. 32,00,000 5.625 years or 5 years 7.5 months
(ii) Calculation of Net Present Value (NPV) @10% discount rate:
Year Net Cash Inflow Present Value Factor at 10% Present Value
(₹.) Discount Rate (₹.)
(a) (b) (c) = (a) x(b)
1 28,00,000 0.909 25,45,200
2 28,00,000 0.826 23,12,800
3 28,00,000 0.751 21,02,800
4 28,00,000 0.683 19,12,400
5 28,00,000 0.621 17,38,800
6 32,00,000 0.564 18,04,800
7 40,00,000 0.513 20,52,000
Solution 20:
(a)
(i) Payback Period
Project Cumulative Cash Outflows (In ₹)
Years A B C D
1 10,000 7,500 2,000 10,000
2 - 15,000 6,000 13,000
3 - - 18,000 16,000
(𝐶𝐹𝐴𝑇−𝐷𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛)×1/𝑁𝑜. 𝑜𝑓 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠
(ii) ARR = 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡
(10,000−10,000)1/1
Project A: (10,000)1/2
=0
(15,000−10,000)1/2
Project B: (10,000)1/2
= 2,500/5,000 = 50%
(18,000−10,000)1/3
Project C: (10,000)1/2
= 2,667/5,000 = 53%
(16,000−10,000)1/3
Project D: (10,000)1/2
= 2,000/5,000 = 40%
Note: This net cash proceed includes recovery of investment also. Therefore, net cash earnings are found by
deducting initial investment.
(iii) IRR
Project A: The net cash proceeds in year 1 are just equal to investment. Therefore, r = 0%
Project B: This project produces an annuity of ₹ 7,500 for two years.
Therefore, the required PVAF is: 10,000/7,500 = 1.33. This factor is found under 32% column. ∴ r = 32%.
Project C: Since cash flows are uneven, the trial and error method will be followed.
Using 20% rate of discount the NPV is + ₹ 1,389. At 30% rate of discount, the NPV is (₹ 633).The true rate of
return should be less than 30%. At 27% rate of discount it is found that the NPV is –₹ 86 and at 26% + ₹ 105.
Through interpolation, we find r = 6.5%
Project D: In this case also by using the trial and error method, it is found that at 37.6% rate of discount
NPV become almost zero. Therefore, r = 37.6%.
(iv) NPV
Project A:
At 10% - 10,000 + 10,000 × 0.909 = (910)
At 30% - 10,000 + 10,000 × 0.769 = (2,310)
Project B:
At 10% - 10,000 + 7,500(0.909 + 0.826) = +3,013
At 30% - 10,000 + 7,500(0.769 + 0.592) = +208
Project C:
At 10% - 10,000 + 2,000 × 0.909 + 4,000 × 0.826 + 12,000 × 0.751 = +4,134
At 30% - 10,000 + 2,000 × 0.769 + 4,000 × 0.592 + 12,000 × 0.455 = (633)
Project D:
At 10% - 10,000 + 10,000 × 0.909 + 3,000 × (0.826 + 0.751) = +3821
At 30% - 10,000 + 10,000 × 0.769 + 3,000 × (0.4555) = +831
The projects are ranked as follows according to the various methods:
Ranks
Projects PBP ARR IRR NPV (10%) NPV (30%)
A 1 4 4 4 4
B 2 2 2 3 2
C 3 1 3 1 3
D 1 3 1 2 1
(b) Payback and ARR theoretically unsound method for choosing between the investment projects. Between
the two time-adjusted (DCF) investment criteria, NPV and IRR, NPV gives consistent results. If the projects
are independent (and there is no capital rationing), either IRR or NPV can be used since the same set of
projects will be accepted by any of the methods. In the present case, except projects A all the three projects
should be accepted if the discount rate is 10%. Only projects B and D should be undertaken if the discount
rate is 30%.
If it is assumed that the projects are mutually exclusive, then under the assumption of 30% discount rate,
the choice is between B and D (A and C are unprofitable). Both criteria IRR and NPV give the same results, D
is the best. Under the assumption of 10% discount rate, ranking according to IRR and NPV conflict (except
for project A). If the IRR rule is followed, project D should be accepted. But the NPV rule tells that project C
is the best. The NPV rule generally gives consistent results in conformity with the wealth maximization
principle. Therefore, project C should be accepted following the NPV rule.
Solution 22:
Particulars ₹
Additional Income (Saving in Materials Waste) 50,000
₹2,00,000
Less: Additional Depreciation on new Machine = ( 10 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠 ) 20,000
Additional Profit before Tax 30,000
Less: Tax thereon at 50% 15,000
Profit After Tax 15,000
Add: Depreciation 20,000
Cash Flow After Taxes 35,000
Annuity Factor for 10 years at 10% 6.1446
Discounted Cash Inflows (PVCI) (₹ 35,000 × 6.1446) 2,15,061
IMPORTANT NOTE: In case of uniform CFAT, use Annuity Factors. In case of differential CFAT, use PV Factors.
NPV and PI generally give the same accept reject decision.
Solution 23:
Project Outflow ₹ 2,00,000
Year 1 (₹) 2 (₹) 3(₹) 4 (₹) 5(₹)
Profit after depreciation but
before tax 85,000 1,00,000 80,000 80,000 40,000
Less: Tax (30%) (25,500) (30,000) (24,000) (24,000) (12,000)
PAT 59,500 70,000 56,000 56,000 28,000 Average=₹ 53,900
Add: Depreciation 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000
Net Cash Inflow 99,500 1,10,000 96,000 96,000 68,000 Average=₹ 93,900
(i) Calculation of payback period 1.91 years
Solution 24:
(i) Projects Cumulative Cash Inflows
Years A B C D
1 6,000 2,500 1,500 0
2 8,000 5,000 4,000 0
3 10,000 10,000 4,500 3,000
4 22,000 17,500 9,500 9,000
(i) If standard payback is 2 years, Project C is the only acceptable project. But if standard payback
period is 3 years, all the four projects are acceptable. However, as the projects are mutually
exclusive, only one project is to be chosen which has the earliest payback period; hence, Project C
is acceptable.
Discounted
PBP A B C D
1,390 1,904 70 746
3 Years + 8,196
= 3 Years + 5,123
= 2 Years + 376
= 3 Years + 4,098
=
3.17 Years 3.37 Years 2.19 Years 3.18 Years
If standard discounted payback period is 2 years, no project is acceptable on discounted payback period
criterion.
If standard discounted payback is 3 years, Project ‘C’ is acceptable on discounted payback period criterion.
According to NPV Technique Project A is the best. Project A is acceptable under the NPV method. The NPV
method gives a better mutually exclusive choice than PI method. The NPV method guarantees the choice of
the best alternative.
Solution 25:
Statement showing the computation of present value of cash flows:
Net Cash Flows Present discounted value @
Year ₹ 11% 12% 13% 14% 15%
1 70,000 63,063 62,503 61,950 61,390 60,872
2 1,00,000 81,160 79,720 78,310 76,950 75,610
3 1,30,000 95,056 92,534 90,103 87,750 86,775
4 90,000 59,283 57,195 55,197 53,289 51,462
5 60,000 35,610 34,044 32,568 31,164 29,832
Total 3,34,172 3,25,996 3,18,128 3,10,543 3,04,551
Note: Cash Flows in years 1 to 4 is the cash profit before depreciation and after tax. In the fifth year, the
amount also includes ₹ 5,500 the expected scrap value and ₹ 40,000, the working capital to be released (₹
14,500 + ₹ 5,500 + ₹ 40,000 = ₹ 60,000). At 14% the inflows are almost equal to the outflow. The project hence
yields 14%.
Solution 26:
Computation of NPV (at 12%)
Particulars 1 2 3 4 5
CFBT 160 160 180 180 150
Less: Depreciation (20%) (80) (64) (51.2) (40.96) (163.84)
EBT 80 96 128.8 139.04 (13.84)
Less: Tax (50%) (40) (48) (64.4) (69.52) 6.92
CFAT 120 112 115.60 110.48 156.92
P.V. Factor 0.89 0.80 0.71 0.64 0.57
PVCI 106.8 89.6 82.076 70.707 89.444
PVCI = 438.62
PVCO = 400
NPV = 38.62
Computation of NPV (at 15%)
NPV = [(120 × 0.862) + (112 × 0.74) + (115.60 × 0.64) + (110.48 × 0.55) + (156.92 × 0.48)] – 400
= 396.15 – 400 = ₹ (3.85)
38.62
IRR = 12% + 4% × 42.47 = 15.63%
Solution 27:
1. Cost of Project M
At 15% I.R.R., the sum total of cash inflows = Cost of the project i.e. Initial cash outlay given:
Annual cost saving ₹ 40,000
Useful life 4 years
I.R.R. 15%
Now, considering the discount factor table @ 15% cumulative present value of cash inflows for 4 years is
2.885
Therefore,
Total of cash inflows for 4 years for Project M is (₹ 40,000 × 2.855) ₹ 1,14,200
Hence, cost of the project is ₹ 1,14,200
3. Cost of Capital
If the profitability index (PI) is 1, cash inflows and outflows would be equal. In this case, (PI) is 1.064.
𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑐𝑎𝑠ℎ 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤𝑠
Profitability Index (PI) = 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡
𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑐𝑎𝑠ℎ 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤𝑠
1.064 = ₹1,14,200
1.064 ×₹ 1,14,200 = ₹ 1,21,509
Hence, Discounted cash inflows = ₹ 1,21,509
Since, Annual cost saving is ₹ 40,000. Hence, cumulative discount factor for 4 years
₹1,21,509
= 40,000
= 3.037725 or 3.038
Considering the discount factor table at a discount rate of 12%, the cumulative discount factor for 4 years is
3.038.
Hence, the cost of capital is 12%.
Solution 28:
₹6,15,000
1. Present value of 6 instalments = Annual Instalment x Annuity Factor at 12% = 6 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠
× 4.111 = ₹
4,21,378
2. Present value of lump sum payment = Given = ₹ 5,00,000
3. Conclusion: Instalment Option preferable, since PV of Outflows is lower.
Solution 29:
Statement of Operating Profit from processing of waste (₹ in lakh)
Year 1 2 3 4
Sales :(A) 966 966 1,254 1,254
Material consumption 90 120 255 255
Wages 180 195 255 300
Other expenses 120 135 162 210
Factory overheads (insurance only) 90 90 90 90
Loss of rent on storage space (opportunity cost) 30 30 30 30
Interest @14% 84 63 42 21
Depreciation (as per income tax rules) 150 114 84 63
Total cost: (B) 744 747 918 969
Profit (C)=(A)-(B) 222 219 336 285
Tax (30%) 66.6 65.7 100.8 85.5
Profit after Tax (PAT) 155.4 153.3 235.2 199.5
Statement of Incremental Cash Flows (₹ in lakh)
Year 0 1 2 3 4
Material stock (60) (105) - - 165
Compensation for contract (90) - - - -
Contract payment saved - 150 150 150 150
Tax on contract payment - (45) (45) (45) (45)
Incremental profit - 222 219 336 285
Depreciation added back - 150 114 84 63
Tax on profits - (66.6) (65.7) (100.8) (85.5)
Loan repayment - (150) (150) (150) (150)
Profit on sale of machinery (net) - - - - 15
Total incremental cash flows (150) 155.4 222.3 274.2 397.5
Present value factor 1.00 0.877 0.769 0.674 0.592
Present value of cash flows (150) 136.28 170.95 184.81 235.32
Net present value 577.36
Advice: Since the net present value of cash flows is ₹ 577.36 lakh which is positive the management should
install the machine for processing the waste.
Solution 32:
Computation of Initial Cash Outflows: (0 Period)
Cost of Equipment ₹ 6,00,000
(+) Net Working Capital ₹ 80,000
Initial Cash Outflows ₹ 6,80,000
(4) I.R.R.
Years P.V. Factor (15%) Cash Inflows Present Value of Cash Inflows
1 0.8696 1,98,000 1,72,181
2 0.7561 2,20,750 1,66,909
3 0.6575 1,78,500 1,17,364
4 0.5718 1,59,000 90,916
5 0.4972 2,26,000 1,12,367
Present Value of Cash Inflows 6,59,737
N.P.V. at 15% Cost of Capital = ₹ 6,59,737 – ₹ 6,80,000 = (₹ 20,263)
Discount Rate N.P.V.
12% ₹ 29,109
15% (₹ 20,263)
₹ 29,109
I.R.R. = 12% + ₹49,372 × 3%
= 13.77%
Solution 34:
A hospital is considering to purchase
Analysis of Investment Decisions
Situation-(i) Situation-(ii)
Commission Commission
Determination of Cash inflows
Income before Income after
taxes taxes
Cash flow up-to 7th year:
Sales Revenue 40,000 40,000
Less: Operating Cost (7,500) (7,500)
32,500 32,500
Less: Depreciation (80,000 – 6,000) ÷ 8 (9,250) (9,250)
Net Income 23,250 23,250
Tax @ 30% (6,975) (6,975)
Earnings after Tax (EAT) 16,275 16,275
Add: Depreciation 9,250 9,250
Cash inflow after tax per annum 25,525 25,525
Solution 37:
Calculation of Net Cash flows
Contribution = (400 – 375) ´ 80,000 = ₹ 20,00,000
Fixed costs = 10,40,000 – [(40,00,000 – 5,00,000)/5] = ₹ 3,40,000
21,02,300
The net present value of the project is ₹21,02,300.
Solution 38:
1. Computation of CFAT from the projects
Particulars Machine – I Machine – II
Annual Income before Tax and Depreciation ₹ 3,45,000 ₹ 4,55,000
𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑀𝑎𝑐ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑒 − 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑉𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 ₹10,00,000 ₹15,00,000
Less: Depreciation = 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠 5 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠
= ₹ 2,00,000 6 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠
= ₹ 2,50,000
PBT ₹ 1,45,000 ₹ 2,05,000
Less: Tax at 30% ₹ 43,500 ₹ 61,500
PAT ₹ 1,01,500 ₹ 1,43,500
CFAT = PAT + Depreciation ₹ 3,01,500 ₹ 3,93,500
5. Decision/Project Choice
Criterion Machine I Machine II Preference
NPV at 12% cost of capital ₹ 86,909 ₹ 1,18,074 Machine II
IRR 15.48% 14.80% Machine II
Discounted payback period 4 years 6 months 5 years 5 months Machine II
Equivalent Annual Flows ₹ 86,909
=₹ 24,108
₹ 1,18,074
= ₹ 28,714 Machine II
3.605 4.112
In this case, Machine I and II have differential lives and hence Equivalent Annual Flow Method will be a better
𝑁𝑃𝑉
method for project ranking. Equivalent Annual Flows from the project = 𝐴𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑡 12% 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡 𝐿𝑖𝑓𝑒 𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠
Solution 39:
Working Notes:
1,50,000
Depreciation on Machine X = 5
= ₹ 30,000
2,40,000
Depreciation on Machine Y = 6
= ₹ 40,000
Particulars Machine X (₹) Machine Y (₹)
Annual Savings:
Wages 90,000 1,20,000
Scrap 10,000 15,000
Total Savings (A) 1,00,000 1,35,000
Annual Estimated Cash Cost:
Indirect Material 6,000 8,000
Supervision 12,000 16,000
Maintenance 7,000 11,000
Total Cash Cost (B) 25,000 35,000
Annual Cash Savings (A-B) 75,000 1,00,000
Less: Depreciation 30,000 40,000
Annual Savings Before Tax 45,000 60,000
Less: Tax @ 30% 13,500 18,000
Annual Savings/Profit (After Tax) 31,500 42,000
Add: Depreciation 30,000 40,000
Annual Cash Inflows
Evaluation of Alternatives
31,500
Machine X = 75,000
x 100 = 42%
42,000
Machine Y = 120,000
× 100 = 35%
[Note: ARR can be computed alternatively taking initial investment as the basis for computation (ARR =
Average Annual Net Income/Initial Investment). The value of ARR for Machines X and Y would then change
accordingly as 21% and 17.5% respectively]
𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑉𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒
P.V. Index = 𝐼𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡
2,33,085
Machine X = 1,50,000
= 1.5539
3,57,028
Machine Y = 2,40,000
= 1,487
Solution 40:
(i) Net Present Value at different discounting rates
Project 0% (₹) 10% (₹) 15% (₹) 30% (₹) 40% (₹)
C 8000 4139 2654 - 632 - 2158
The conflict in ranking arises because of skewness in cash flows. In the case of Project C cash flows occur
later in the life and in the case of Project D, cash flows are skewed towards the beginning.
At lower discount rate, project C’s NPV will be higher than that of project D. As the discount rate increases,
Project C’s NPV will fall at a faster rate, due to compounding effect.
After break even discount rate, Project D has higher NPV as well as higher IRR.
(ii) If the opportunity cost of funds is 10%, project C should be accepted because the firm’s wealth will increase
by ₹ 316 (₹ 4,139 - ₹ 3,823).
The following statement of incremental analysis will substantiate the above point.
Project Cash Flows (₹) NPV @ 10% (₹) IRR 12.5%
C0 C1 C2 C3
C-D 0 - 8,000 1,000 9,000 316 0
{- 8000 x 0.909 + {- 8000 x 0.88884
1000 x 0.8264 + + 1000 x 0.7898 +
9000 x 0.7513} 9000 x 0.7019}
Hence, the project C should be accepted, when opportunity cost of funds is 10%.
Solution 41:
1. Computation of NPV(In ₹ 000s)
Yea
rs PVF PVF Project A Project B
PVF
PVCI PVCI PVCI PVCI at at PVCI at
10% 20% CFAT at 10% at 20% CFAT at 10% 20% 27% 27%
1 0.91 0.83 85 77.35 70.55 480.00 436.80 398.40 0.79 379.20
2 0.83 0.69 200 166.00 138.00 100.00 83.00 69.00 0.62 62.00
3 0.75 0.58 240 180.00 139.20 70.00 52.50 40.60 0.49 34.30
4 0.68 0.48 220 149.60 105.60 30.00 20.40 14.40 0.38 11.4
5 0.62 0.41 70 43.40 28.70 20.00 12.40 8.20 0.30 6.00
Total PVCI 616.35 482.05 605.10 530.60 492.90
Less: Initial Investment (PVCO) 500.00 500.00 500.00 500 500
NPV 116.35 (17.95) 105.10 30.60 (7.10)
2. Project A:
116.35
IRR = 10% + [116.35−(−17.95)]
× 10 = 18.66%
Project B:
105.10
IRR = 10% + [(105.10−(−7.10)]
× 17 = 25.92%
3. Decision:
Particulars Project A Project B Preference
NPV at K0 (i.e. 10%) 116.35 105.10 Project A
Solution 42:
Option I: Purchase Machinery and Service Part at the end of Year 1.
Net Present value of cash flow @ 10% per annum discount rate.
36,000 36,000 36,000 20,000 25,000
NVP (in ₹) = - 1,00,000 + (1.1) + (1.1)2 + (1.1)3 – (1.1) + (1.1)3
= - 1,00,000 + 36,000 (0.9091 + 0.8264 + 0.7513) – (20,000 x 0.9091) + (25,000 x 0.7513)
= - 1,00,000 + (36,000 x 2.4868) – 18,182 + 18,782.5
= - 1,00,000 + 89,524.8 – 18,182 + 18,782.5
NPV = - 9,874.7
Since, Net Present Value is negative; therefore, this option is not to be considered.
If Supplier gives a discount of ₹ 10,000 then,
NPV (in ₹ ) = + 10,000 – 9,874.7 = + 125.3
In this case, Net Present Value is positive but very small; therefore, this option may not be advisable.
Option II: Purchase Machinery and Replace Part at the end of Year 2.
36,000 36,000 36,000 30,800 54,000
NVP (in ₹) = - 1,00,000 + (1.1) + (1.1)2 + (1.1)3 – (1.1)2 + (1.1)4
= - 1,00,000+ 36,000 (0.9091 + 0.8264 + 0.7513) – (30,800 x 0.8264) + (54,000 x 0.6830)
= - 1,00,000 + 36,000 (2.4868) – 25,453.12 + 36,882
= - 1,00,000 + 89,524.8 – 25,453.12 + 36,882
NPV = + 953.68
Net Present Value is positive, but very low as compared to the investment.
If the Supplier gives a discount of ₹ 10,000, then
NPV (in ₹) = 10,000 + 953.68 = 10,953.68
Decision: Option II is worth investing as the net present value is positive and higher as compared to Option I.
Solution 43:
(i) Project Initial Net Cash Outflow
Particulars ₹
Purchase Price of system 2,00,000
(+) Installation Cost 50,000
2,50,000
2,50,000
Cash Inflows:
C.F.A.T. 1-5 3.605 68,600 2,47,303
2,47,303
Net Present Value (2,697)
₹ 2,47,303
(iv) Profitability Index = ₹ 2,50,000 = 0.989
₹ 2,50,000
(v) Pay Back Period = ₹ 68,600
= 3.64 years
(vi) (a) Cash outflows (0 Period) = ₹ 2,50,000
Solution 45:
Gross electricity gene = 25 lakhs unit p.a.
Free commitment (4%) = 1 lakh unit p.a.
Net chargeable electricity generate = 24 lakhs unit p.a.
Computation of Annual Cash Flow
Period Rate per unit Revenue Maintenanc Profit Before Tax @ Profit after
(₹) (₹) e cost (₹) Tax (₹) 50%(₹) Tax (₹)
(A) (B) (C)= (A)-(B) (D) (C)-(D)
1 2.25 54,00,000 4,00,000 50,00,000 25,00,000 25,00,000
2 2.50 60,00,000 6,00,000 54,00,000 27,00,000 27,00,000
3 2.75 66,00,000 8,00,000 58,00,000 29,00,000 29,00,000
4 3.00 72,00,000 10,00,000 62,00,000 31,00,000 31,00,000
5 3.25 78,00,000 12,00,000 66,00,000 33,00,000 33,00,000
6 3.50 84,00,000 14,00,000 70,00,000 35,00,000 35,00,000
7 3.75 90,00,000 16,00,000 74,00,000 37,00,000 37,00,000
8 4.25 102,00,000 18,00,000 84,00,000 42,00,000 42,00,000
9 4.75 114,00,000 20,00,000 94,00,000 47,00,000 47,00,000
10 5.25 126,00,000 22,00,000 104,00,000 52,00,000 52,00,000
Solution 46:
Statement showing evaluation of replacement proposal (₹ in Lakhs)
Particulars Time PV Factor Amount Present value
Cash Outflows:
Cost of new computer 35
Less: Scrap of old drawing office &
equipment furniture (9)
Net Cost of replacement 0 1 26 26
P.V. of C.O. 26
Cash Inflows:
Incremental CFAT 1-6 4.018 2.5 10.27
Tax Saving on depreciation 1 0.892 17.5 15.6
Terminal Value 6 0.506 1.0 0.506
26.386
26.386 – 26 =
Net Present Value 0.386
Solution 48:
Workings:
Calculation of Depreciation:
₨ 1,40,000 – ₨ 30,000
On Modernized Equipment = 5 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠
= ₨ 22,000 p.a.
₨ 3,50,000 – ₨ 60,000
On New Machine = 5 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠
= ₨ 58,000 p.a.
(i) Calculation of Incremental annual cash inflows/ savings:
Particulars Existing Modernization New Machine
Equipment Amount (₨) Savings Amount (₨) Savings (₨)
(₨) (₨)
(1) (2) (3)=(1)-(2) (4) (5)=(1)-(4)
Wages & Salaries 45,000 35,500 9,500 15,000 30,000
Supervision 20,000 10,000 10,000 7,000 13,000
Maintenance 25,000 5,000 20,000 2,500 22,500
Power 30,000 20,000 10,000 15,000 15,000
Total 1,20,000 70,500 49,500 39,500 80,500
Less: Depreciation 22,000 58,000
(Refer Workings)
Total Savings 27,500 22,500
Less: Tax @ 50% 13,750 11,250
After Tax Savings 13,750 11,250
Add: Depreciation 22,000 58,000
Incremental Annual 35,750 69,250
Cash Inflows
Solution 49:
1. Initial Investment = Machine Purchase price + Modification charges + Installation Charges +
Testing Charges
= ₹ 9,00,000 + ₹ 30,000 + ₹ 60,000 + ₹ 90,000 = ₹ 10,80,000.
2. Salvage Value = ₹ 1,80,000
3. Life = 3 years
₹10,80,000−₹1,80,000
4. Depreciation p.a. = 3 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠
= ₹ 3,00,000 (same as charged in P&L Account given in
Question).
5. Computation of CFAT p.a. and NPV:(In ₹)
Particulars Year I Year II Year III
Sales 10,00,000 20,00,000 8,00,000
Less: Relevant Costs:
Materials and Labour (4,00,000) (7,50,000) (3,50,000)
Rent Expense (50,000) (50,000) (50,000)
Depreciation (3,00,000) (3,00,000) (3,00,000)
Rent Income foregone (37,500) (37,500) (37,500)
Total Costs 7,87,500 11,37,500 7,37,500
Profit After Tax 2,12,500 8,62,500 62,500
Less: Tax at 50% (1,06,250) (4,31,250) (31,250)
Profit After Tax 1,06,250 4,31,250 31,250
Add: Depreciation 3,00,000 3,00,000 3,00,000
CFAT 4,06,250 7,31,250 3,31,250
Add: Salvage value of Machine - - 1,80,000
PVF at 20% 0.8333 0.6944 0.5787
Present Value 3,38,528 (a) 5,07,780 (b) 2,95,860 (c)
Total Present Value (a) + (b) + (c) 11,42,168
Less: Initial Investment 10,80,000
NPV 62,168
Solution 50:
Statement showing computation of Annual CFAT(In ₹)
Particulars 1 2 3 4 5
Savings in Accommodation Expenses 8,00,000 10,00,000 12,00,000 14,00,000 16,00,000
Less: Annual Maintenance Cost (1,50,000) (1,50,000) (1,50,000) (1,50,000) (1,50,000)
Add: Saving in Boarding Charges 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
Add: Saving in Executive Training
Programmes 2,00,000 2,00,000 2,00,000 2,00,000 2,00,000
CFBT (1) 9,00,000 11,00,000 13,00,000 15,00,000 17,00,000
Less: Depreciation 3,00,000 3,00,000 3,00,000 3,00,000 3,00,000
PBT 6,00,000 8,00,000 10,00,000 12,00,000 14,00,000
Less: Tax (2) 3,00,000 4,00,000 5,00,000 6,00,000 7,00,000
CFAT 6,00,000 7,00,000 8,00,000 9,00,000 10,00,000
PVF 0.87 0.76 0.66 0.57 0.50
PVCI 5,22,000 5,32,000 5,28,000 5,13,000 5,00,000
PVCI = ₹ 25,95,000
NPV = ₹ 25,95,000 – ₹ 15,00,000 = ₹ 10,95,000
Notes: 1. No other alternative use of land has been given hence it will not be considered for evaluation of
Proposal.
2. Consultants Remuneration, Travel and Conveyance & special allowances will continue to be incurred, hence
is ignored.
Solution 51:
Computation of NPV
Particulars Year Cash Flows (₹) PVF PV (₹)
Initial Investment (80% of 20 Lacs) 0 16,00,000 1 16,00,000
Installation Expenses 0 1,00,000 1 1,00,000
Instalment of Purchase Price 1 4,00,000 0.870 3,48,000
PV of Outflows (A) 20,48,000
CFAT 0 (2,00,000) 1 (2,00,000)
CFAT 1 8,81,000 0.870 7,66,470
CFAT 2 8,95,000 0.756 6,76,620
CFAT 3 9,09,000 0.658 5,98,122
CFAT 4 9,23,000 0.572 5,27,956
CFAT 5 10,37,000 0.497 5,15,389
PV of Inflows (B) 28,84,557
NPV (B-A) 8,36,557
Profitability Index (B/A) 1.408 or 1.41
Evaluation: Since the NPV is positive (i.e. ₹8,36,557) and Profitability Index is also greater than 1 (i.e. 1.41),
Alpha Ltd. may introduce artificial intelligence (AI) while making computers.
Solution 52:
Let the total value of machine necessary for replacement be x.
(a) Statement showing determination of cost of New Machine
Cash Outflows:
Cost of new Machine X
Less: Scrap value of old
machine (5,00,000)
Net cost of replacement 0 1 x – 5,00,000 x – 5,00,000
PVCO (A) x – 5,00,000
Working Notes:
(i) Computation of Incremental C.F.A.T.
Year 1 2 3 4 5
Incremental capacity 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Incremental Production and
sales (kgs.) 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000
₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ ₹
Incremental Contribution 1,50,000 3,00,000 4,50,000 6,00,000 7,50,000
Less: Incremental Fixed Cost (50,000) (1,00,000) (1,50,000) (2,00,000) (2,50,000)
Incremental PBT 1,00,000 2,00,000 3,00,000 4,00,000 5,00,000
Tax @ 40% (40,000) (80,000) (1,20,000) (1,60,000) (2,00,000)
Incremental PAT 60,000 1,20,000 1,80,000 2,40,000 3,00,000
Working Notes:
1. Computation of Annual CFAT
Particulars 1 2 3
Incremental Production (unit) 10,000 30,000 50,000
Contribution (₹ 15 p.u.) 1,50,000 4,50,000 7,50,000
Less: Incremental F.C. (Example:
Depreciation) (50,000) (1,50,000) (2,50,000)
Solution 53:
Evaluation of proposal to repair existing machine or buy a new machine for
M/s S. Engineering Company
(i) To repair Existing Machine:
Particulars ₹
Present value of after-tax cash outflows
Cost of repairs immediately net of tax ₹9,500 (50% of ₹ 19,000)
₹9,500
Equivalent annual cost for 5 years( 3.791 ) 2,506
Running and maintenance cost per annum net of tax (50% of ₹
20,000) 10,000
Total net equivalent cash outflows p.a. 12,506
Solution 54:
ABC & Co.
Equivalent Annual Cost (EAC) of new machine
₹
(i) Cost of new machine now 18,00,000
Add: PV of annual repairs @ ₹ 2,00,000 per annum for 8 years
(₹ 2,00,000 x 4.4873) 8,97,460
26,97,460
Less: PV of Salvage value at the end of 8 years
(₹ 4,00,000 x 0.3269) 1,30,760
25,66,700
Equivalent annual cost (EAC) (₹ 25,66,700/4.4873) 5,71,992
PV of cost of replacing the old machine in each of 4 years with new machine
Scenario Year Cash Flow (₹) PV @ 15% PV (₹)
Replace Immediately 0 (5,71,992) 1.00 (5,71,992)
0 8,00,000 1.00 8,00,000
2,28,008
Replace in one year 1 (5,71,992) 0.8696 (4,97,404)
1 (2,00,000) 0.8696 (1,73,920)
1 5,00,000 0.8696 4,34,800
(2,36,524)
Replace in two years 1 (2,00,000) 0.8696 (1,73,920)
Advice: The company should replace the old machine immediately because the PV of cost of replacing the old
machine with new machine is least.
Solution 56:
(i) Calculation of Net Initial Cash Outflow:
Particulars (₹.) (₹.)
Cost of new machine 5,25,000
Less: Sale proceeds of existing machine 90,000
Savings of tax on loss on sale of existing machine {₹.
1,87,500 - ₹. 90,000) x 0.3} 29,250 1,19,250
Net initial cash outflow 4,05,750
Solution 57:
Statement showing the evaluation of two machines
Machines A B
Purchase cost (₹) (i) 1,50,000 1,00,000
Life of machines (years) 3 2
Running cost of machine per year (₹) (ii) 40,000 60,000
Cumulative present value factor for 1-3 years @
10% (iii) 2.486 -
Cumulative present value factor for 1-2 years @
10% (iv) - 1.735
Present value of running cost of machines (₹)
(v) 99,440 [(ii) × (iii)] 1,04,100 [(ii) × (iv)]
Cash outflow of machines (₹) (vi) = (i) + (v) 2,49,440 2,04,100
Equivalent present value of annual cash 1,17,637 [(vi) ÷
outflow 1,00,338[(vi ÷ iii)] (iv)]
Decision: Company X should buy machine A since its equivalent cash outflow is less than machine B.
Solution 58:
Since project Lives are different, the Equivalent Annual Flows method is adopted.
Machine A B
1. Cost of Machine (Initial Investment) ₹ 6,00,000 ₹ 4,00,000
2. Useful Life 2 Years 2 years
3. Depreciation per annum = (1) ÷ (2) ₹ 2,00,000 ₹ 2,00,000
4. Cash Operating Expenses p.a. = Cash
Outflow p.a. ₹ 1,20,000 ₹ 1,80,000
5. Annuity Factor at 10% for 3 year and 2
years 0.9091 + 0.8264 + 0.9091 + 0.8264 =
6. Equivalent Annual Investment = (1) ÷ (5) 0.7513 = 2.4868 1.7355
7. Equivalent Annual Outflow/Cost (4) + (6) ₹ 2,41,274 ₹ 2,30,481
Outflow = ₹ 3,61,274 ₹ 4,10,481
Decision: Since Machine A has the least EAC (Equivalent Annual Costs), it may be selected.
Solution 59:
A firm is in need of a small vehicle
Selection of Investment Decision
Tax shield on Purchase of New vehicle
Year WDV Dep. @ 25% Tax shield @ 30%
1 1,50,000 37,500 11,250
2 1,12,500 28,125 8,437
3 84,375 21,094 6,328
4 63,281 15,820 4,746
5 47,461 11,865 3,560
6 35,596 8,899 2,670
7 26,697 6,674 2,002
8 20,023 5,006 1,502
9 15,017 3,754 1,126
10 11,263 2,816 845
11 8,447 Scrap value
Solution 60:
(i) Statement showing Evaluation of Mutually Exclusive Proposals (In ₹)
P.V.
Particulars Time Factor Service Part Replace Part
Amount P.V. Amount P.V
Cash Outflows:
Cost of machinery 0 1 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
Service Cost 1 0.9091 10,000 9,091 .... ....
Add: Replace part 2 0.8264 .... .... 15,400 12,727
P.V. of cash outflows
(A) 59,091 62,727
Cash Inflows:
Cash inflows from
operation 2.4869
1-3 18,000 44,764
1-4 3.1699 18,000 57,058
Scrap value of
machine 3 0.7513 12,500 9,391
4 0.6830 9,000 6,147
P.V. of cash inflows (A) 54,155 63,205
N.P.V. (B) – (A) (4,936) 478
Advise: Purchase machine & Replace the part at end of second year.
Solution 61:
(a) Option I: Purchase Machinery and Service Part at the end of Year 2 and 4 .
Net Present value of cash flow @ 12% per annum discount rate.
NPV (in ₹) = - 10,00,000 + 2,56,000 x (0.8928+0.7972+0.7118+0.6355+0.5674) – (1,00,000 x
0.7972+1,00,000 x 0.6355) + (76,000 x 0.5674)
= - 10,00,000 + (2,56,000 x 3.6047) – 1,43,270+43,122.4
= - 10,00,000 + 9,22,803.2 – 1,43,270+ 43,122.4
NPV = - 1,77,344.4
Since Net Present Value is negative; therefore, this option is not to be considered.
If Supplier gives a discount of ₹ 90,000, then:
NPV (in ₹) = + 90,000 - 1,77,344.4 = -87,344.4
In this case, Net Present Value is still negative; therefore, this option may not be advisable
Option II: Purchase Machinery and Replace Part at the end of Year 2.
NPV (in ₹)= - 10,00,000 + 2,56,000 x (0.8928+0.7972+0.7118+0.6355+0.5674) – (3,00,000 x
0.7118) + (1,86,000 x 0.5066+1,36,000 x 0.5066)
= - 10,00,000 + (2,56,000 x 3.6047) – 2,13,540+1,63,125.2
= - 10,00,000 + 9,22,803.2 – 2,13,540+1,63,125.2
NPV = - 1,27,611.6
Net Present Value is negative, the machinery should not be purchased.
If the Supplier gives a discount of ₹ 90,000, then:
In this case, Net Present Value is still negative; therefore, this option may not be advisable.
Decision: The Machinery should not be purchased as it will earn a negative NPV in both options of repair and
replacement.
Solution 62:
Let the minimum labour savings required per annum be x.
Statement showing determination of minimum labour saving required per annum(In ₹)
Particulars Time PV Factor Amount PV
Cash Outflows:
Cost of machine 0 1 80,000 80,000
80,000
Cash Inflows:
Saving in Raw Material
Cost 1-7 4.564 8,000 36,512
Minimum labour 1-7 4.564 x 4.564x
36,512 + 4.564x
80,000 = 36,512 + 4.564x
43,488
x = 4.564 = ₹ 9,528
Maximum Bonus per annum = 4,472
4,472
Maximum percentage change in estimated labour savings that will render project unviable = 14,000
× 100 =
31.94%
Solution 63:
Evaluation of Alternatives:
Savings in disposing off the waste
Particulars (₹)
Outflow (50,000 × ₹ 1) 50,000
Less: tax savings @ 50% 25,000
Net Outflow per year 25,000
Note- Research cost of ₹ 60,000 is not relevant for decision making as it is sunk cost.
Solution 64:
Computation of initial cash outlay (COF)
(₹ In Lakhs)
Project Cost 240
Working Capital 30
270
Solution 65:
Computation of initial cash outlay
Particulars Amount (₹ in lakhs)
Equipment Cost (0) 120
Working Capital (0) 15
135
Computation of PV of CIF
Year CF (₹) PV Factor @ 12% ₹
1 2,00,000 0.893 1,78,600
2 28,00,000 0.797 22,31,600
3 85,25,000 0.712 60,69,800
4 85,25,000 0.636 54,21,900
5 85,25,000 0.567 48,33,675
6 58,25,000 0.507 29,53,275
7 58,25,000 0.452 26,32,900
8 58,25,000 0.404 29,99,700
WC 15,00,000
SV 1,00,000
2,73,21,450
PV of Cash Outflow 1,35,00,000
Additional Investment = ₹ 10,00,000 × 0.797 7,97,000 (1,42,97,000)
NPV 1,30,24,450
Recommendation: Accept the project in view of positive NPV.
Solution 66:
Workings:
(a) Calculation of annual cash flow (₹ in lakh)
Year Sales VC FC Dep. Profit Tax PAT Dep. Cash inflow
1 172.80 103.68 36 43.75 (10.63) - - 43.75 33.12
2 259.20 155.52 36 43.75 23.93 3.99* 19.94 43.75 63.69
3 624.00 374.40 36 43.75 169.85 50.955 118.895 43.75 162.645
4-5 648.00 388.80 36 48.25 174.95 52.485 122.465 48.25 170.715
6-8 432.00 259.20 36 48.25 88.55 26.565 61.985 48.25 110.235
Advise: Since the project has a positive NPV, therefore, it should be accepted.
Solution 67:
Project Investment Present value of Future Net Present value
Required Cash Flows
₹ ₹ ₹
1 2,00,000 2,90,000 90,000
2 1,15,000 1,85,000 70,000
3 2,70,000 4,00,000 1,30,000
1 and 2 3,15,000 4,75,000 1,60,000
1 and 3 4,40,000 6,90,000 2,50,000
2 and 3 3,85,000 6,20,000 2,35,000
1, 2 and 3 (Refer Working note) 6,80,000* 9,10,000 2,30,000
Working Note:
(i) Total Investment required if all the three projects are undertaken simultaneously:
(₹)
Project 1& 3 4,40,000
Project 2 1,15,000
Plant extension cost 1,25,000
Total 6,80,000
(ii) Total of Present value of Cash flows if all the three projects are undertaken simultaneously:
(₹)
Project 2& 3 6,20,000
Project 1 2,90,000
Total 9,10,000
Projects 1 and 3 should be chosen, as they provide the highest net present value.
Solution 68:
Since the life span of each machine is different and time span exceeds the useful lives of each modeI, we shall
use Equivalent Annual Cost method to decide which brand should be chosen.
(i) If machine is used for 20 years
(a) Residual value of machine of brand X
= [₹. 15,00,000 – (1 - 0.10)] - (₹. 15,00,000 × 0.06 × 14) = ₹. 90,000
(b) Residual value of machine of brand Y
= [₹. 10,00,000 – (1 - 0.40)] - (₹. 10,00,000 × 0.06 × 9) = ₹. 60,000
Solution 69:
Calculation of Net Cash flows
Contribution = (₹ 6 – ₹ 3) x 1,00,000 units = ₹ 3,00,000
Fixed costs (excluding depreciation) = ₹ 1,00,000
Year Capital (₹) Contribution (₹) Fixed costs (₹) Advertisement/ Net cash flow
Maintenance expenses (₹) (₹)
0 (2,50,000) (2,50,000)
1 3,00,000 (1,00,000) (20,000) 1,80,000
2 3,00,000 (1,00,000) 2,00,000
3 3,00,000 (1,00,000) 2,00,000
4 3,00,000 (1,00,000) 2,00,000
5 3,00,000 (1,00,000) (30,000) 1,70,000
6 3,00,000 (1,00,000) 2,00,000
7 3,00,000 (1,00,000) 2,00,000
8 3,00,000 (1,00,000) 2,00,000
Solution 71:
Statement showing ranking of projects on the basis of Profitability Index
Project Amount (₹) P.I. Rank
1 3,00,000 1.22 1
2 1,50,000 0.95 5
3 3,50,000 1.20 2
4 4,50,000 1.18 3
5 2,00,000 1.20 2
6 4,00,000 1.05 4
Assuming that projects are indivisible and there is no alternative use of the money allocated for capital
budgeting on the basis of P.I the S Ltd. is advised to undertake investment in projects 1, 3 and 5.
However, among the alternative projects the allocation should be made to the projects which add the most to
the shareholders wealth. The NPV method, by its definition, will always select such projects.
Solution 72:
Computation of NPV of optimum project mix (In ₹)
Projects Initial Investment NPV
4 13,00,000 7,00,000
3 7,00,000 4,40,000
1 8,00,000 2,00,000
Uninvested 2,00,000 (17,313)
30,00,000 13,22,687
Working Notes:
Computation of NPV in various projects (In ₹)
Projects NPV
1 10,00,000 – 8,00,000 = 2,00,000
2 19,00,000 – 15,00,000 = 4,00,000
3 11,40,000 – 7,00,000 = 4,40,000
4 20,00,000 – 13,00,000 = 7,00,000
Solution 73:
Computation of NPVs per Re. 1 of Investment and Ranking of the Projects
Investment (₹ NPV @ 15% (₹ NPV per ₹
Project '000) '000) 1invested Ranking
A (50) 15.4 0.31 5
B (40) 18.7 0.47 2
C (25) 10.1 0.40 3
D (30) 11.2 0.37 4
E (35) 19.3 0.55 1
Solution 74:
Option I: Cost of travel, in case Video Conferencing facility is not provided
Total Trip = No. of Locations × No. of Persons × No. of Trips per Person = 7×2×2 = 28 Trips
Total Travel Cost (including air fare, hotel accommodation and meals) (28 trips × ₹ 27,000 per trip)
= ₹ 7,56,000
Option II: Video Conferencing Facility is provided by Installation of Own Equipment at Different Locations
Cost of Equipment at each location (₹ 8,25,000 × 8 locations) = ₹ 66,00,000
Economic life of Machines (5 years). Annual depreciation (66,00,000/5) = ₹ 13,20,000
Annual transmission cost (48 hrs. transmission × 8 locations × ₹ 300 per hour) = ₹ 1,15,200
Annual cost of operation (13,20,000 + 1,15,200) = ₹ 14,35,200
Analysis: The annual cash outflow is minimum, if video conferencing facility is engaged on rental basis.
Therefore, Option III is suggested.
Solution 75:
Net Present Value (NPV) of Projects:
Year Cash Inflows Cash Inflows Present Value PV of Project PV of Project
Project A (₹) Project B (₹) Factor @ 10% A (₹) B (₹)
0 (1,00,000) (3,00,000) 1.000 (1,00,000) (3,00,000)
1 50,000 1,40,000 0.909 45,450 1,27,260
2 60,000 1,90,000 0.826 49,560 1,56,940
3 40,000 1,00,000 0.751 30,040 75,100
25,050 59,300
Internal Rate of Returns (IRR) of projects:
Since by discounting cash flows at 10% we are getting values very far from zero. Therefore, let us discount
cash flows using 20% discounting rate.
Year Cash Inflows Cash Inflows Present Value PV of Project A PV of Project B
Project A (₹) Project B (₹) Factor @ 20% (₹) (₹)
0 (1,00,000) (3,00,000) 1.000 (1,00,000) (3,00,000)
1 50,000 1,40,000 0.833 41,650 1,16,620
2 60,000 1,90,000 0.694 41,640 1,31,860
3 40,000 1,00,000 0.579 23,160 57,900
6,450 6,380
Since by discounting cash flows at 20% we are getting values far from zero. Therefore, let us discount cash
flows using 25% discounting rate.
Year Cash Inflows Cash Inflows Present Value PV of Project A PV of Project B
Project A (₹) Project B (₹) Factor @25% (₹) (₹)
0 (1,00,000) (3,00,000) 1.000 (1,00,000) (3,00,000)
1 50,000 1,40,000 0.800 40,000 1,12,000
2 60,000 1,90,000 0.640 38,400 1,21,600
3 40,000 1,00,000 0.512 20,480 51,200
(1,120) (15,200)
The internal rate of return is, thus, more than 20% but less than 25%. The exact rate can be obtained by
interpolation:
6,450 6,450
IRRA = 20% + 6,450 – (1,120) x (25% - 20%) = 20% + 7,570 x 5% = 24.26%
6,380 6,380
IRRB = 20% + 6,380 6,380 – (15,200)
x (25% - 20%) = 20% + 21,580
x 5% = 21.48%
Overall Position
Project A Project B
NPV @ 10% 25,050 59,300
IRR 24.26% 21.48%
Thus there is contradiction in ranking by two methods.
Solution 2:
Since r > Ke , the optimum dividend pay-out ratio would ‘Zero’ (i.e. D = 0),
Accordingly, value of a share:
𝑟
𝐷+ 𝐾𝑒
(𝐸 − 𝐷)
P = 𝐾𝑒
0.12
0+ (10 − 0)
P = 0.10
0.10
= ₹ 120
The optimality of the above payout ratio can be proved by using 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% as pay- out
ratio:
At 25% pay-out ratio
0.12
2.5 + (10 − 2.5)
P = 0.10
0.10
= ₹ 115
Solution 3:
₹ in lakhs
Net Profit 30
Less: Preference dividend 12
Earning for equity shareholders 18
Therefore earning per share 18/3 = ₹ 6
0.20
𝐷+ (6 − 𝐷)
₹ 42 = 0.16
0.16
0.16𝐷 +1.2−0.20𝐷
6.72 = 0.16
𝐷𝑃𝑆 3.12
D/P ratio = 𝐸𝑃𝑆
x 100 = 6
x 100 = 52%
Solution 4:
₹ in lakhs
Net Profit 30
Less: Preference dividend 12
Earning for equity shareholders 18
Therefore earning per share 18/3 = ₹ 6.00
𝐸1(1−𝑏)
P0 = 𝐾𝑒 −𝑏𝑟
Here, E1 = 6, Ke =
6×0.25 1.5
P0 = 0.16−(0.75×0.2)
= 0.16 − 0.15
= 150
6×0.5 3
P0 = 0.16−(0.5×0.2)
= 0.16 − 0.10
= 50
6×1 6
P0 = 0.16−(0 × 0.2)
= 0.16
= 37.50
Solution 5:
𝐷 5
P0 = 𝐾𝑒
= 0.10
= ₹ 50
Solution 6:
𝐷0 (1+𝑔)
P0 = 𝐾𝑒 −𝑔
D0 = 10 × 20% = ₹2
g = 2% or 0.02
Ke = 15% or 0.15
2(1+0.02)
P = 0.15−0.02 = ₹ 15.69
Solution 7:
In the present situation, the current MPS is as follows:
𝐷0 (1+𝑔)
P0 = 𝐾𝑒 −𝑔
2(1+0.05)
P = 0.15−0.05
= ₹ 21
So, the market price of the share is expected to vary in response to change in expected growth rate is
dividends.
Solution 8:
𝐸
Price per share (P) = m (D + 3
)
30
P = 2 (30 x 0.6 + 3
)
P = 2(18 + 10) = ₹ 56
Solution 9:
𝐸
Price per share (P) = m (D + 3
)
𝐸
₹ 58.33 = 7 (5 + 3
)
105 + 7E = 175
Or, 7E = 175 -105 = ₹10
Therefore, EPS = ₹10
Solution 10:
D₁ = Dₒ + [(EPS ×Target payout) - Dₒ] × Af
D₁ = 9.80 + [(20 × 60%) – 9.80] × 0.45
D₁ = 9.80 + 0.99 = ₹10.79
Solution 11:
Given,
Cost of Equity (Ke) 12%
Number of shares in the beginning (n) 10,000
Current Market Price (P0) ₹ 100
Net Profit (E) ₹ 5,00,000
Expected Dividend ₹ 10 per share
Investment (I) ₹ 10,00,000
𝑃1+0
100 = 1+ 0.12
P1 = 112 – 0 = ₹112
𝑃1+ 10
100 = 1+ 0.12
P1 = 112 – 10 = ₹102
𝐹𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑
No. of shares = 𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝑒𝑛𝑑(𝑃1)
6,00,000
∆n = 102
= 5882.35 or 5883 shares
Solution 12:
(i) Walter’s model is given by
𝑟
𝐷+ 𝐾𝑒
(𝐸 − 𝐷)
P = 𝐾𝑒
Where
P = Market price per share.
E = Earnings per share = ₹ 5
D = Dividend per share = ₹ 3
R = Return earned on investment = 15%
Ke = Cost of equity capital = 12%
0.15
3+ (5 − 3)
P = 0.12
0.12
= ₹ 45.83
(ii) According to Walter’s model when the return on investment is more than the cost of equity capital, the price
per share increases as the dividend pay-out ratio decreases. Hence, the optimum dividend pay-out ratio in this
case is nil. So, at a pay-out ratio of zero, the market value of the company’s share will be:
0.15
0+ (5 − 0)
P = 0.12
0.12
= ₹ 52.08
Solution 13:
𝐸1 (1−𝑏)
P0 = 𝐾𝑒 −𝑏𝑟
If the retention ratio (b) is changed from 0.6 to 0.4, the new share price will be as follows:
Growth Firm
10(1−0.4) 6
P0 = 0.10−0.15 𝑥 0.4 = 0.10−0.06 = ₹ 150
Normal Firm
10(1−0.4) 6
P0 = 0.10−0.10 𝑥 0.4 = 0.10−0.04
= ₹ 100
Declining Firm
10(1−0.4) 6
P0 = 0.10−0.08 𝑥 0.4 = 0.10−0.032
= ₹ 88.24
Solution 14:
Given,
Cost of Equity (Ke) 10%
Number of shares in the beginning (n) 25,000
Current Market Price (P0) ₹ 100
Net Profit (E) ₹ 2,50,000
Expected Dividend ₹ 5 per share
Investment (I) ₹ 5,00,000
Case 1 - When dividends are paid Case 2 - When dividends are not paid
Step 1 Step 1
𝑃1 + 𝐷1 𝑃1 + 𝐷1
P0 = 1 + 𝐾𝑒
P0 = 1 + 𝐾𝑒
𝑃1 + 5 𝑃1 + 0
100 = 1 + 0.10
100 = 1 + 0.10
3,75,000 2,50,000
∆n = 105
= 3,571.4285 ∆n = 110
= 2,272.73
Step 3: Step 3:
Vf =
(25,000 + 3,75,000
105 )105 −5,00,000 + 2,50,000 Vf =
(25,000 + 2,50,000
110 )110 −5,00,000 + 2,50,000
(1 + 0.10) (1 + 0.10)
= ₹ 25,00,000 = ₹ 25,00,000
Solution 15:
(i) The EPS of the firm is ₹ 10 (i.e., ₹ 2,00,000/ 20,000). r = 2,00,000/ (20,000 shares × ₹100) = 10%. The P/E
Ratio is given at 12.5 and the cost of capital, Ke, may be taken at the inverse of P/E ratio. Therefore, Ke is 8
(i.e., 1/12.5). The firm is distributing total dividends of ₹ 1,50,000 among 20,000 shares, giving a dividend per
share of ₹ 7.50. the value of the share as per Walter’s model may be found as follows:
𝑟 0.1
𝐷+ 𝐾𝑒
(𝐸 − 𝐷) 7.5 + (10 − 7.5)
P = 𝐾𝑒
= 0.08
0.08
= ₹ 132.81
The firm has a dividend payout of 75% (i.e., ₹ 1,50,000) out of total earnings of ₹ 2,00,000. since, the rate of
return of the firm, r, is 10% and it is more than the Ke of 8%, therefore, by distributing 75% of earnings, the firm
is not following an optimal dividend policy. The optimal dividend policy for the firm would be to pay zero
dividend and in such a situation, the market price would be:
0.1
0+ (10 − 0)
0.08
0.08
= ₹ 156.25
So, theoretically the market price of the share can be increased by adopting a zero payout.
(ii) The P/E ratio at which the dividend policy will have no effect on the value of the share is such at which the
Ke would be equal to the rate of return, r, of the firm. The Ke would be 10% (= r) at the P/E ratio of 10.
Therefore, at the P/E ratio of 10, the dividend policy would have no effect on the value of the share.
(iii) If the P/E is 8 instead of 12.5, then the Ke which is the inverse of P/E ratio, would be 12.5 and in such a
situation ke > r and the market price, as per Walter’s model would be:
𝑟 0.1
𝐷+ 𝐾𝑒
(𝐸 − 𝐷) 7.5 + (10 − 7.5)
P = 𝐾𝑒
= 0.125
0.125
= ₹ 76
Solution 16:
Market price per share by
(i) Walter’s model:
𝑟 0.25
𝐷+ 𝐾𝑒
(𝐸 − 𝐷) 6+ (10 − 6)
P = 𝐾𝑒
= 0.20
0.20
= ₹ 55
(ii) Gordon’s model (Dividend Growth model): When the growth is incorporated in earnings and dividend, the
present value of market price per share (Po) is determined as follows:
Gordon’s theory:
𝐸 (1−𝑏)
Present market price per share (Po ) = P0 = 𝐾 −𝑏𝑟
Where,
Po = Present market price per share.
E = Earnings per share
b = Retention ratio (i.e. % of earnings retained)
r = Internal rate of return (IRR)
Solution 17:
The P/E ratio i.e. price earnings ratio can be computed with the help of the following formula:
𝑀𝑃𝑆
P/E ratio = 𝐸𝑃𝑆
𝐸
P0 = m (D + 3
)
Where,
P0 = Market price per share
D = Dividend per share
E = Earnings per share
m = a multiplier
𝐸
P0 = 9 (0.4E + 3
)
1.2 𝐸 + 𝐸
P0 = 9 ( 3
) = 3(2.2E)
P0 = 6.6E
𝑃
𝐸
= 6.6 i.e. P/E ratio is 6.6 times
Solution 18:
Market Price (P) per share as per Walter’s Model is:
𝑟
𝐷+ 𝐾𝑒
(𝐸 − 𝐷)
P = 𝐾𝑒
Where,
P = Price of Share
r = Return on investment or rate of earning
Ke = Rate of Capitalization or Cost of Equity
Calculation of Market Price (P) under the following dividend payout ratio and earning rates:
(i) (ii) (iii)
Rate of Earning DP ratio 50% DP ratio 75% DP ratio 100%
(r)
(a) 15% 0.15
5 + 0.10 (10 − 5)
0.15
7.5 + 0.10 (10 − 7.5)
0.15
10 + 0.10 (10 − 10)
0.10 0.10 0.10
12.5 11.25 10
= 0.10
= ₹ 125 = 0.10
= ₹ 112.5 = 0.10
= ₹ 100
(b) 10% 5+
0.10
0.10
(10 − 5) 7.5 +
0.10
0.10
(10 − 7.5) 10 +
0.10
0.10
(10 − 10)
0.10 0.10 0.10
10 10 10
= 0.10
= ₹ 100 = 0.10
= ₹ 100 = 0.10
= ₹ 100
(c) 5% 5+
0.05
0.10
(10 − 5) 7.5 +
0.05
0.10
(10 − 7.5) 10 +
0.05
0.10
(10 − 10)
0.10 0.10 0.10
7.5 8.75 10
= 0.10
= ₹ 75 = 0.10
= ₹ 87.5 = 0.10
= ₹ 100
Solution 19:
₹ 40 𝑙𝑎𝑘ℎ𝑠
Earnings Per share(E) = 4,00,000
= ₹ 10
Where,
P = Market Price of the share.
E = Earnings per share.
D = Dividend per share.
Ke = Cost of equity/ rate of capitalization/ discount rate.
R = Internal rate of return/ return on investment
0.20
4+ (10 − 4)
P = 0.16
0.16
4 + 7.5
= 0.16
= ₹ 71.88
(ii) Gordon’s formula: When the growth is incorporated in earnings and dividend, the present value of market
price per share (Po) is determined as follows
𝐸 (1−𝑏)
Gordon’s theory = P0 = 𝑘 −𝑏𝑟
Where,
P0 = Present market price per share.
E = Earnings per share
b = Retention ratio (i.e. % of earnings retained)
r = Internal rate of return (IRR)
Growth rate (g) = br
10 (1−0.60) 4
Now, P0 = 16 −(0.60 𝑥 0.20)
= ₹ 0.04
= ₹ 100
Solution 22:
Do= ₹ 4
D1= ₹4 (1.20)1 = ₹ 4.80
D2= ₹4 (1.20)2 = ₹ 5.76
D3= ₹4 (1.20)2 (1.10) 1 = ₹ 6.336
𝐷1 𝐷2 𝑃2
P0 = 1 + 2 + 2
(1+𝐾𝑒) (1+𝐾𝑒) (1+𝐾𝑒)
𝐷3 ₹ 6.336
P2 = 𝐾𝑒−𝑔
= 0.15−0.10
= ₹ 126.72
Solution 23:
Computation of Present value of Equity Shares
Particulars Time PVF Amount in PV in ₹
₹
Amount of dividends receivable during 1 0.917 2.30 2.11
abnormal growth period 2 0.842 2.65 2.23
3 0.772 3.04 2.35
4 0.708 3.35 2.37
5 0.650 3.68 2.39
6 0.596 4.05 2.41
Amount of Market Price at the end of 6 0.596 106.25 63.33
abnormal growth period
= ₹ 4.04 (1.05) / 0.09 – 0.05 = ₹ 106.25
Present Value of Share 77.19
Solution 24:
Stage 1:
Explicit Forecast Period (first 4 years)
Time PVF @ 16% Dividend PV
1 0.862 1.68 1.45
2 0.743 1.88 1.40
3 0.641 2.07 1.33
4 0.552 2.28 1.26
5.44
Stage 2:
Horizon Period (Beyond 4 years)
Expected dividend for the fifth year
D5 = 2.28 x 1.08 = 2.46
Solution 25.
Po = Rs 120
E = Rs 12
D = Rs 6
Compute P/E Ratio. Also compute multiplier as per traditional theory.
P = M (D + E/3)
120 = M (6 + 12/3)
120 = M (30/3)
12 = M
Solution 26:
P/E Ratio = 10
Ke = 1 / P/E Ratio = 1/10 = 10%
Equity Shares = 50,000
Dividend = ₹ 8
b) If Dividend is declared:
P1 = P0 (1 + Ke) – D = ₹ 100 (1 + 0.10) – ₹8 = ₹ 110 – ₹8 = ₹ 102
Solution 27:
(a)
₹ in lakhs
Net Profit 75
Less: Preference dividend 30
Earning for equity shareholders 45
Earning per share = 45/7.5 = ₹ 6.00
Let, the dividend per share be D to get share price of ₹ 42
𝑟
𝐷+ (𝐸−𝐷)
P= 𝐾𝑒
𝐾𝑒
0.20
𝐷+ 0.16 (6−𝐷)
₹42= 0.16
(b) Since r > Ke, the optimum dividend pay-out ratio would ‘Zero’ (i.e. D = 0),
(c) The optimality of the above pay-out ratio can be proved by using 25%, 50%, 75% and
100% as pay- out ratio:
At 25% pay-out ratio
0.20
1.5+ (6−1.5)
P= 0.16
0.16
= ₹44. 531
At 50% pay-out ratio
0.20
3+ (6−3)
P= 0.16
0.16
= ₹42. 188
At 75% pay-out ratio
0.20
4.5+ (6−4.5)
P= 0.16
0.16
= ₹39. 844
At 100% pay-out ratio
0.20
6+ (6−6)
P= 0.16
0.16
= ₹ 37.50
From the above it can be seen that price of share is maximum when dividend pay-out
ratio is ‘zero’ as determined in (b) above.
Solution 28:
P0 = ₹ 10 n = 2,00,000, E = ₹ 5,00,000 Ke = 15%, ∆n = 26,089, I = ?
𝑃1
Po= 1+𝐾𝑒
𝑃1
10= 1.15
P1= 11.5
𝐼−𝐸 + 𝑛𝐷1
∆𝑛=𝑃1
1−5,00,000
26.089= 11.5
I = 8,00,024
Now,
P0 = ₹ 10, n = ₹ 2,00,000,
E = ₹ 5,00,000, I = 8,00,024,
Ke = 15%, ∆n 47,619, D1 = ?
𝑃1+𝐷1
Po= 1+𝐾𝑒
𝑃1+𝐷1
10= 1.15
P1= 11.5-D1
𝐼−𝐸 + 𝑛𝐷1
∆𝑛 = 𝑃1
8,00,024−5,00,000+2,00,000𝐷1
47.619= 𝑃1
47,619 P1 = 2,00,000 D1+ 3,00,024
From 1,
2,47,594.5 = 2,47,619 D1
2,47,594.5
D1 = 2,47,619 = 0.99 =1
P1 = 11.5 – D1
P1 = 11.5 – 1
P1 = 10.5
(2,00,000+47,619)(10.5)−8,00,024 +5,00,000
[Link] = 1.15
n.P0 = ₹19,99,979 » ₹20,00,000
Using direct calculation,
n.P0 = 2,00,000 ×10 = ₹ 20,00,000
Solution 29:
CASE 1: Value of the firm when dividends are not paid.
Step 1: Calculate price at the end of the period
Ke = 15%, P₀ = ₹100, D₁ = 0
𝑃1+𝐷1
Pₒ = 1+𝐾𝑒
𝑃1+0
₹100 = 1+0.15
P₁ = ₹115
Step 2: Calculation of funds required for investment
Earning ₹ 40,00,000
Dividend distributed Nil
Fund available for investment ₹ 40,00,000
Total Investment ₹ 50,00,000
Balance Funds required ₹ 50,00,000 - ₹ 40,00,000 = ₹
10,00,000
Step 3: Calculation of No. of shares required to be issued for balance funds
No. of shares = Funds required/P1
∆n = ₹10,00,000/₹115
Step 4: Calculation of value of firm
nPₒ = [(n+∆n)P1-I+E]/(1+Ke)
nP₀ = [(100000+1000000/₹115) ₹115 - ₹5000000 + ₹4000000]/(1.15)
= ₹1,00,00,000
CASE 2: Value of the firm when dividends are paid.
Step 1: Calculate price at the end of the period
Ke= 15%, P₀= ₹100, D₁= ₹10
𝑃1+𝐷1
Pₒ = 1+𝐾𝑒
𝑃1+10
₹100 = 1+0.15
P₁ = ₹105
Step 2: Calculation of funds required for investment
Earning ₹ 40,00,000
Dividend distributed 10,00,000
Fund available for investment ₹ 30,00,000
Total Investment ₹ 50,00,000
Balance Funds required ₹ 50,00,000 - ₹ 30,00,000 = ₹ 20,00,000
Step 3: Calculation of No. of shares required to be issued for balance fund
No. of shares = Funds Required/P1
∆n = ₹2000000/₹105
Step 4: Calculation of value of firm
nPₒ = [(n+∆n)P1 – I+E]/(1+Ke)
nP₀ = [(100000 + 2000000/₹105) ₹105 – ₹5000000 + ₹4000000]/(1.15)= ₹1,00,00,000
Thus, it can be seen from the above calculations that the value of the firm remains the same in either case.
Solution 30:
Price per share according to Gordon’s Model is calculated as follows:
Particulars Amount in ₹
Net Profit 78 lakhs
Less:Preference dividend(120 lakhs@15%) 18 lakhs
Earnings for equity shareholders 60 lakhs
Solution 31:
(i) As per Gordon’s Model, Price per share is computed using the formula:
𝐸1(1−𝑏)
P0 = 𝐾𝑒−𝑏𝑟
Where,
P0 = Price per share
E1 = Earnings per share
b = Retention ratio; (1 - b = Pay-out ratio)
Ke = Cost of capital r = IRR
br = Growth rate (g)
Applying the above formula, price per share
30×0.3* 9
P0 = 0.15−0.70×0.2 = 0.01 = ₹ 900
9
*Dividend pay-out ratio = ₹30 = 0.3 or 30%
(ii) As per Walter’s Model, Price per share is computed using the formula:
𝑟
𝐷+ 𝐾𝑒 (𝐸−𝐷)
Price (P) = 𝐾𝑒
Where,
P = Market Price of the share
E = Earnings per share
D = Dividend per share
Ke = Cost of equity/ rate of capitalization/ discount rate
r = Internal rate of return/ return on investment
Applying the above formula, price per share
0.20
𝑔+ 0.15 (30−9) 37
P= 0.15
= 0.15
= ₹246.67
Solution 32:
The Present Value of the Cash Flows for all the years by discounting the cash flow at 7% is calculated as
below:
Year Cash flows Discounting Present value of Cash
₹In lakhs Factor@7% Flows ₹ In Lakhs
1 50 0.935 46.75
2 120 0.873 104.76
3 150 0.816 122.40
4 160 0.763 122.08
5 130 0.713 92.69
Total of present value of Cash flow 488.68
Less: Initial investment (200.00)
Net Present Value (NPV) 288.68
Now, the risk-free rate is 7 % and the risk premium expected by the Management is 7 %. So, the risk adjusted
discount rate is 7 % + 7 % =14%.
Discounting the above cash flows using the Risk Adjusted Discount Rate would be as below:
Solution 33:
(i) Current Market price of shares (applying Walter’s Model)
● The EPS of the firm is ₹ 5 (i.e., ₹ 10,00,000 / 2,00,000).
● Rate of return on Investment (r) = 20%.
● The Price Earnings (P/E) Ratio is given as 10, so capitalization rate (Ke), may be taken at
the inverse of P/E Ratio. Therefore, Ke is 10% or .10 (i.e., 1/10).
● The firm is distributing total dividends of ₹ 6,00,000 among 2,00,000 shares, giving a
dividend per share of ₹ 3.
The value of the share as per Walter’s model may be found as follows: Walter’s model is given by-
𝑟
𝐷+ 𝐾𝑒 (𝐸−𝐷)
P= 𝐾𝑒
Where,
P = Market price per share.
E = Earnings per share = ₹ 5
D = Dividend per share = ₹ 3
R = Return earned on investment = 20 %
Ke = Cost of equity capital = 10% or .10
0.20
3+ 0.10 (5−3)
P= 0.10
= ₹ 70
Current Market Price of shares can also be calculated as follows:
𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑒𝑡 𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒
Price Earnings (P/E) Ratio = 𝐸𝑎𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠
𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑒𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒
Or, 10 = ₹ 10,00,000 / 2,00,000
𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑒𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒
Or , 10 = ₹5
Market Price of Share = ₹ 50
(ii) Capitalization rate (Ke) of its risk class is 10% or .10 (i.e., 1/10).
(iii) Optimum dividend pay-out ratio
According to Walter’s model when the return on investment is more than the cost of equity capital (10%), the
price per share increases as the dividend pay-out ratio decreases. Hence, the optimum dividend pay-out ratio
in this case is nil or 0 (zero).
(iv) Market price per share at optimum dividend pay-out ratio
At a pay-out ratio of zero, the market value of the company’s share will be:
0 + 0.20 (5 – 0)
0.20
0+ 0.10 (5−0)
P= 0.10
= ₹ 100
Solution 34:
(i) Calculation of market price per share
According to Miller – Modigliani (MM) Approach:
𝑃1 + 𝐷1
Po = 1 + 𝐾𝑒
Where,
Existing market price (Po) = ₹ 150
Expected dividend per share (D1) = ₹ 8
Capitalization rate (ke) = 0.10
Market price at year end (P1) = to be determined
(a) If expected dividends are declared, then
𝑃1 + ₹ 8
₹ 150 = 1 + 0.10
P1 = ₹ 157
(b) If expected dividends are not declared, then
𝑃1 + 0
₹ 150 = 1 + 0.10
P1 = ₹ 165
(ii) Calculation of number of shares to be issued
(a) (b)
Dividends are declared Dividends are not
(₹ lakh) Declared (₹ lakh)
Net income 300 300
Total dividends (80) -
Retained earnings 220 300
Investment budget 600 600
Amount to be raised by new issues 380 300
Relevant market price (₹ per share) 157 165
No. of new shares to be issued (in 2.42 1.82
lakh) (₹ 380 ÷ 157; ₹ 300 ÷ 165)
(iii) Calculation of market value of the shares
(a) (b)
Dividends are declared Dividends are not Declared
Existing shares (in lakhs) 10.00 10.00
New shares (in lakhs) 2.42 1.82
Total shares (in lakhs) 12.42 11.82
Market price per share (₹) 157 165
Total market value of shares at the 12.42 × 157 11.82 × 165
end of the year (₹ in lakh) = 1,950 (approx.) = 1,950 (approx.)
Hence, it is proved that the total market value of shares remains unchanged irrespective of whether dividends
are declared, or not declared.
Solution 35:
Given,
Cost of Equity 12%
Number of shares in the beginning (n) 40,000
Current Market Price (Po) ₹ 200
Net profit (E) ₹ 5,00,000
Expected dividend (D1) ₹ 10 per share
Investment (I) ₹ 10,00,000
Situation 1 Situation 2
𝑃1 + 𝐷1 𝑃1 + 𝐷1
(i) Po = 1 + 𝐾𝑒 (i) Po = 1 + 𝐾𝑒
𝑃1 + 10 𝑃1 + 0
200 = 1 + 0.12 200 = 1 + 0.12
P1 + 10 = 200 x 1.12 P1 + 0 = 200 x 1.12
P1 = 224 – 10 = 214 P1 = 224 – 0 = 224
(ii) Calculation of funds required (ii) Calculation of funds required
= Total Investment – (Net profit – = Total Investment – (Net profit –
Dividend) Dividend)
= 10,00,000 – (5,00,000 – 4,00,000) = 10,00,000 – (5,00,000 – 0)
= 9,00,000 = 5,00,000
(iii) No. of shares required to be issued (iii) No. of shares required to be issued
for balance fund for balance fund
𝐹𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑠 𝑅𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝐹𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑠 𝑅𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑
No. of shares = 𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝑒𝑛𝑑 (𝑃1) No. of shares = 𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝑒𝑛𝑑 (𝑃1)
9,00,000 9,00,000
Δn = 214
= 4205.61 Δn = 214
= 2232.14
(iv) Calculation of value of firm (iv) Calculation of value of firm
(𝑛 + 𝑛)𝑃1 – 𝐼 + 𝐸 (𝑛 + 𝑛)𝑃1 – 𝐼 + 𝐸
Vf = 1 + 𝐾𝑒
Vf = 1 + 𝐾𝑒
9,00,000 5,00,000
{40,000+ 214 }214−10,00,000+5,00,000 {40,000+ 224 }224−10,00,000+5,00,000
= 1+0.12
= 1+0.12
94,60,000 – 5,00,000 94,60,000 – 5,00,000
= 1.12
= 80,00,000 = 1.12
= 80,00,000
Solution 36:
(a)
₹ In lakhs
Net Profit 75
Less: Preference Dividend 30
Earning for equity shareholders 45
Earnings per share = 45/7.5 = ₹ 6.00
Let, the dividend per share be D to get share price of ₹ 42
𝑟
𝐷+ 𝐾𝑒 (𝐸−𝐷)
P= 𝐾𝑒
0.20
𝐷+ 016 (6−𝐷)
₹ 42 = 0.16
0.16𝐷 + 1.2 – 0.20𝐷
6.72 = 0.16
0.04D = 1.2 – 1.0752
D = 3.12
𝐷𝑃𝑆 3.12
D/P ratio = 𝐸𝑃𝑆 x 100 = 6
x 100 = 52%
So, the required dividend payout ratio will be = 52%
(b) Since r > Ke, the optimum dividend pay-out ratio would ‘Zero’ (i.e. D = 0),
Accordingly, Value of a share:
𝑟
𝐷+ 𝐾𝑒 (𝐸−𝐷)
P= 𝐾𝑒
0.20
0+ 0.16 (6−0)
P= 0.16
= ₹ 46.875
(c) The optimality of the above pay-out ratio can be proved by using 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% as pay-out ratio:
At 25% pay-out ratio
0.20
1.5+ 0.16 (6−1.5)
P= 0.16
= ₹ 44.531
Solution 37:
As per Dividend discount model, the price of share is calculated as follows:
𝐷1 𝐷2 𝐷3 𝐷4 𝐷4 (1+𝑔) 1
P= (1 + 𝐾𝑒)1
+ (1 + 𝐾𝑒)2
+ (1 + 𝐾𝑒)3
+ (1 + 𝐾𝑒)4
+ (𝐾𝑒 – 𝑔)
x (1 + 𝐾𝑒)4
Where,
P = Price per share
Ke = required rate of return on equity
g = Growth rate
₹ 140 𝑥 1.12 ₹ 156.80 𝑥 1.12 ₹ 175.62 𝑥 1.12 ₹ 196.69 𝑥 1.12 ₹ 220.29(1 + 0.05) 1
P = (1 + 0.18)1 + (1 + 0.18)2
+ (1 + 0.18)3
+ (1 + 0.18)4
+ (0.18 – 0.05)
x (1 + 0.18)4
P= 132.81 + 126.10 + 119.59 + 113.45 + 916.34 = ₹ 1,408.29
Intrinsic value of share is ₹ 1,408.29 as compared to latest market price of ₹ 2,185. Market price of share is
over-priced by ₹ 776.71.
(20,80,000 +24,00,000) / 2
= 1,20,00,000 / 365
Cost of Goods Sold ₹
Opening Stock of Finished Goods 20,80,000
Add: Production Cost 1,23,20,000
1,44,00,000
Less: Closing Stock of Finished Goods (24,00,000)
1,20,00,000
(4) Receivables Collection Period (D)
𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑠
Receivables Collection Period = 𝐷𝑎𝑖𝑙𝑦 𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
(12,00,000+16,00,000)/2
= 1,60,00,000/365
= 31.94 Days
(5) Payables Payment Period (C)
𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑃𝑎𝑦𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑠
Payables Payment Period = 𝐷𝑎𝑖𝑙𝑦 𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡 𝑝𝑢𝑟𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑒
(16,00,000+19,20,000)/2
= 88,00,000/365
= 73 days
(6) Duration of Operating Cycle (O)
O = R+W+F+D–C
= 64.21 + 18.96 + 68.13 + 31.94 – 73
= 110.24 days
Computation of Working Capital
(i) Number of Operating Cycles per Year = 365/Duration Operating Cycle =
365/110.24 = 3.311
(ii) Total Operating Expenses ₹
Total Cost of Goods sold 1,20,00,000
Add: Administration Expenses 14,00,000
Add: Selling Expenses 6,00,000
1,40,00,000
(iii) Working Capital Required
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑂𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐸𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑠
Working Capital Required = 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑂𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐶𝑦𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟
1,40,00,000
= 3.311
= ₹ 42,28,329.81
Solution 7:
Working Notes :
1. Raw material Storage Period (R)
𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑘 𝑜𝑓 𝑅𝑎𝑤 𝑀𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙
= 𝐴𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑅𝑎𝑤 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙 × 365
₹ 45 + ₹ 65
= 2
₹ 380
× 365 = 52.83 or 53 days
= 2
₹ 450
× 365 = 34.87 or 35 days
3. Finished Stock Storage Period (F)
= 2
₹ 525
× 365 = 45.19 or 45 days.
4. Receivable (Debtors) Collection Period (D)
𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑠
= 𝐴𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
× 365
₹ 112 + ₹ 135
= 2
₹ 585
× 365 = 77.05 or 77 days
5. Payable (Creditors) Payment Period (C)
𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑦𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑠
= 𝐴𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡 𝑃𝑢𝑟𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑠
× 365
₹ 68 + ₹ 71
= 2
₹ 400
× 365= 63.41 or 64 days
(i) Net Operating Cycle Period
=R+W+F+D–C
= 53 + 35 + 45 + 77 – 64
= 146 days
(ii) Number of Operating Cycles in the Year
365 365
= 𝑂𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐶𝑦𝑐𝑙𝑒 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑑 = 146 = 2.5 times
(iii) Amount of Working Capital Required
𝐴𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑂𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 ₹ 325
= 𝑁𝑜. 𝑜𝑓 𝑂𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑦𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑠
= 2.48 = ₹ 130 Lakh
Solution 8:
Maximum Permissible Bank Finance as per Tandon Committee Norms (Amounts In ₹ Lakhs)
1st Method
Total Current Assets required 1,480
Less: Current Liabilities (600)
Working Capital 880
Less: 25% of Long Term Sources (220)
MPBF 660
2nd Method
Current Assets required 1,480
Less: 25% to be provided (370)
Long term funds 1,110
Less: Current Liabilities (600)
MPBF 510
3rd Method
Current Assets 1,480
Less: Core Current Assets required (380)
Less: 25% provided for (275)
Long Term Funds 825
Less: Current Liabilities (600)
MPBF 225
Solution 10:
₹1,51,20,000 × 4
Stock of Work-in-progress ( 52 𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑡ℎ𝑠
× 50%) = 5,81,538
₹1,51,20,000
Stock of Finished goods ( 12 𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑡ℎ𝑠
) = 12,60,000
2
Debtors (₹ 1,72,80,000 × 80% × 12
) = 23,04,000
Cash balance = 1,00,000
₹86,40,000
Outstanding Wages & Overheads ( 52 𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑘𝑠
× 1.5 weeks) = 2,49,231
Total Current Liabilities (B) = 7,89,231
Net working Capital [(A) – (B)] = 45,36,307
Working Notes: ₹
1. Annual Raw Materials Requirements [1,44,000 units × ₹ 45] = 64,80,000
Annual Direct Labour Cost [1,44,000 units × ₹ 20] = 28,80,000
Annual Overhead Cost [1,44,000 units × ₹ 40] = 57,60,000
Total Cost = 1,51,20,000
Solution 13:
Statement showing the requirements of Working Capital (Cash Cost basis)
Particulars (₹) (₹)
A. Current Assets:
Inventory:
Stock of Raw material (₹ 27,00,000 × 3/12) 6,75,000
Stock of Finished goods (₹ 77,40,000 × 3/12) 19,35,000
Receivables (₹ 88,20,000 × 3/12) 22,05,000
Administrative and Selling Overhead (₹ 10,80,000 × 1/12) 90,000
Cash in Hand 3,00,000
Solution 16:
Working Notes:
1) Raw material inventory: The cost of materials for the whole year is 60% of the Sales value.
54,000 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑠 𝑥 (60 % 𝑜𝑓 ₹ 200)
= 12 𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑡ℎ𝑠
x 2 months = ₹ 10,80,000
2) Work-in-process (Each unit of production is expected to be in process for one month):
(₹)
(a) Raw materials in work-in-process (being one month’s
raw material requirements) 5,40,000
(b) Labour costs in work-in-process
(54,000 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑠 𝑥 (10% 𝑜𝑓 ₹ 200 ) 𝑥 1 𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑡ℎ)
x 0.5 45,000
12 𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑡ℎ𝑠
(c) Overheads
(54,000 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑠 𝑥 (20% 𝑜𝑓 ₹ 200 ) 𝑥 1 𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑡ℎ)
x 0.5 90,000
12 𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑡ℎ𝑠
6,75,000
Solution 19:
Statement of Working Capital requirements (Cash Cost Basis)
Particulars Amount (₹)
Current Assets:
Stock of Raw Materials (₹ 4,50,000 ÷ 12) 37,500
Stock of Finished Goods (₹ 12,90,000 ÷ 12) 1,07,500
Debtors (₹ 14,70,000 ÷ 6) 2,45,000
Cash in hand 1,00,000
Advance payment: Sales promotion expenses (₹ 60,000 × 3/12) 15,000
Total Current Assets (A) 5,05,000
Current Liabilities:
Creditors for Materials (₹ 4,50,000/12 months × 2 months) 75,000
Wages outstanding (₹ 3,60,000 ÷ 12) 30,000
Manufacturing expenses outstanding 40,000
Administrative expenses outstanding (₹ 1,20,000 ÷ 12) 10,000
Total Current Liabilities (B) 1,55,000
Net Working Capital (A) – (B) 3,50,000
Add: 15% Safety Margin 52,500
Working Capital Requirement 4,02,500
Solution 21:
Statement showing the requirements of Working Capital
Particulars ₹ ₹
A. Current Assets:
Inventory:
Stock of raw materials (₹ 2,31,840 x 2/12) 38,640
Stock of Work-in-progress (As per Working Note) 39,240
Stock of Finished goods (₹ 3,51,600 x 10/100) 35,160
Receivables (Debtors) (₹ 3,04,992 x 2/12) 50,832
Cash in Hand 19,200
Prepaid Expenses:
Wages & Mfg. expense (₹ 1,59,000 x 1/12) 13,250
Administrative expenses (₹ 33,600 x 1/12) 2,800
Selling & Distribution Expenses (₹ 31,200 x 1/12) 2,600
Advance taxes paid {(70% of 24,000) x 3/12} 4,200
Gross Working Capital 2,05,922 2,05,922
B. Current Liabilities:
Payable for Raw materials (₹ 2,70,480 x 1.5/12) 33,810
Provision for Taxation (Net of Advance Tax) (₹ 24,000 x 30/100) 7,200
Total Current Liabilities 41,010 41,010
C. Excess of CA over CL 1,64,912
Add: 10% for unforeseen contingencies 16,491
Net Working Capital requirements 1,81,403
Working Notes:
Solution 23:
(i) Projected Statement of Profit / Loss
(Ignoring Taxation)
Year 1 Year 2
Production (Units) 12,000 18,000
Sales (Units) 10,000 17,000
(₨) (₨)
Sales revenue (A) (Sales unit × ₨ 192) 19,20,000 32,64,000
Cost of production:
Materials cost 9,60,000 14,40,000
(Units produced × ₨ 80)
Direct labour and variable expenses (Units 4,80,000 7,20,000
produced × ₨ 40)
Fixed manufacturing expenses 2,88,000 2,88,000
(Production Capacity: 24,000 units × ₨ 12)
Depreciation 4,80,000 4,80,000
(Production Capacity : 24,000 units × ₨ 20)
Fixed administration expenses 1,92,000 1,92,000
(Production Capacity : 24,000 units × ₨ 8)
Total Costs of Production 24,00,000 31,20,000
Add: Opening stock of finished goods (Year 1 : Nil; --- 4,00,000
Year 2 : 2,000 units)
Cost of Goods available for sale 24,00,000 35,20,000
(Year 1: 12,000 units; Year 2: 20,000 units)
Less: Closing stock of finished goods at average (4,00,000) (5,28,000)
cost (year 1: 2000 units, year 2 : 3000 units)
(Cost of Production × Closing stock/ units
produced)
Cost of Goods Sold 20,00,000 29,92,000
Add: Selling expenses – Variable (Sales unit × ₨ 8) 80,000 1,36,000
Add: Selling expenses -Fixed (24,000 units × ₨ 2) 48,000 48,000
Cost of Sales : (B) 21,28,000 31,76,000
Profit (+) / Loss (-): (A - B) (-) 2,08,000 (+) 88,000
Working Notes:
1. Calculation of creditors for supply of materials:
Year 1 (₨) Year 2 (₨)
Materials consumed during the year 9,60,000 14,40,000
Add: Closing stock (2 month’s average 1,60,000 2,40,000
consumption)
11,20,000 16,80,000
Less: Opening Stock --- 1,60,000
Purchases during the year 11,20,000 15,20,000
Average purchases per month (Creditors) 93,333 1,26,667
Solution 29:
Workings:
(1) Statement of cost at single shift and double shift working
24,000 units 48,000 Units
Per unit Total Per unit Total
(₨) (₨) (₨) (₨)
Raw materials 24 5,76,000 21.6 10,36,000
Wages:
Variable 12 2,88,000 12 5,76,000
Fixed 8 1,92,000 4 1,92,000
Overheads:
Variable 4 96,000 4 1,92,000
Fixed 16 3,84,000 8 3,84,000
Total cost 64 15,36,000 49.6 23,80,800
Profit 8 1,92,000 22.4 10,75,200
Sales 72 17,28,000 72 34,56,000
𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑅𝑠 17,28,000
(2) Sales in units 2020-21 = 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑡 𝑆𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒
= 𝑅𝑠 72
= 24,000 units
(3) Stock of Raw Materials in units on 31.3.2021
𝑉𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑘𝑅𝑠 1,44,000
= 𝑅𝑠 24 = 6,000 units
𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡
(4) Stock of work-in-progress in units on 31.3.2021
𝑉𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘−𝑖𝑛−𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠
𝑅𝑠 88,000
- 𝑅𝑠 (24+20) = 2,000 units
𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡
(5) Stock of finished goods in units 2020-21
𝑉𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑘 𝑅𝑠 2,88,000
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡
= 𝑅𝑠 64
= 4,500 units
Solution 02:
Statement Showing Evaluation of Various Credit Policies under Consideration
Particulars Policy I Policy II Policy III Policy IV
Incremental gains:
Contribution 1,50,000 3,00,000 4,20,000 4,50,000
Total Incremental Gains (A) 1,50,000 3,00,000 4,20,000 4,50,000
Incremental Costs:
Opportunity cost of Investment of debtor 42,014 88,889 1,38,194 1,82,639
Total Incremental Costs (B) 42,014 88,889 1,38,194 1,82,639
Net incremental Gains (A) – (B) 1,07,986 2,11,111 2,81,806 2,67,361
Working Notes:
(i) Computation of Incremental Contribution (₹ In Lakhs)
Particulars Existing Policy I Policy II Policy III Policy IV
Sales 60 65 70 74 75
Less: Variable contribution of sales
(70%) (42) (45.5) (49) (51.8) (52.5)
Contribution 18 19.5 21 22.2 22.5
Incremental Contribution 1.5 3 4.2 4.5
Solution 07:
A. Statement showing the Evaluation of Debtors Policies (Total Approach)
Particulars Present Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed
Policy Policy A Policy B Policy C Policy D
30 days 40 days 50 days 60 days 75 days
` ` ` ` `
A. Expected Profit:
(a) Credit Sales 6,00,000 6,30,000 6,48,000 6,75,000 6,90,000
(b) Total Cost other than
Bad Debts
(i) Variable Costs [Sales 4,00,000 4,20,000 4,32,000 4,50,000 4,60,000
× 2/ 3]
(ii)Fixed Costs 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
4,50,000 4,70,000 4,82,000 5,00,000 5,10,000
(c) Bad Debts 6,000 9,450 12,960 20,250 27,600
(d) Expected Profit [(a) – 1,44,000 1,50,550 1,53,040 1,54,750 1,52,400
(b) – (c)]
B. Opportunity Cost of 7,500 10,444 13,389 16,667 21,250
Investments in
Receivables
C. Net Benefits (A – B) 1,36,500 1,40,106 1,39,651 1,38,083 1,31,150
Recommendation: The Proposed Policy A (i.e. increase in collection period by 10 days or total 40 days) should
be adopted since the net benefits under this policy are higher as compared to other policies.
Working Notes:
(i) Calculation of Fixed Cost = [Average Cost per unit – Variable Cost per unit] × No. of Units sold
= [` 2.25 - ` 2.00] × (` 6,00,000/3)
= ` 0.25 × 2,00,000 = ` 50,000
Another method of solving the problem is Incremental Approach. Here we assume that sales are all
credit sales.
Particulars Present Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Policy D 75
Policy 30 Policy Policy Policy C 60 days
days days
A 40 days B 50 days
` ` ` ` `
A. Incremental Expected
Profit:
(a) Incremental Credit --- 30,000 48,000 75,000 90,000
Sales
(b) Incremental Costs
(i) Variable Costs --- 20,000 32,000 50,000 60,000
(ii)Fixed Costs --- - - - -
(c) Incremental --- 3,450 6,960 14,250 21,600
Profit (a – b –c)]
B. Required Return on
Incremental
Investments:
(a) Cost of Credit Sales 4,50,000 4,70,000 4,82,000 5,00,000 5,10,000
(b) Collection period 30 40 50 60 75
(c) Investment in 37,500 52,222 66,944 83,333 1,06,250
Receivable (a × b/360)
(d) Incremental --- 14,722 29,444 45,833 68,750
Investment in
Receivables
(e) Required Rate of 20 20 20 20
Return (in %)
(f) Required Return on --- 2,944 5,889 9,167 13,750
Incremental
Investments (d× e)
C. Net Benefits (A – B) --- 3,606 3,151 1,583 - 5,350
Recommendation: The Proposed Policy A should be adopted since the net benefits under this policy are higher
than those under other policies.
Solution 13:
Evaluation of Alternative Credit Policies
Particulars Present (₹) Policy A (₹) Policy B (₹) Policy C (₹) Policy D (₹)
Sales 50,00,000 56,00,000 60,00,000 62,00,000 63,00,000
Variable Cost at 80% 40,00,000 44,80,000 48,00,000 49,60,000 50,40,000
Contribution 10,00,000 11,20,000 12,00,000 12,40,000 12,60,000
Less: Fixed Costs 6,00,000 6,00,000 6,00,000 6,00,000 6,00,000
Profit 4,00,000 5,20,000 6,00,000 6,40,000 6,60,000
Cost of Debtors p.a.
= Total Costs 46,00,000 50,80,000 54,00,000 55,60,000 56,40,000
Collection Period 30 days 45 days 60 days 75 days 90 days
Average Debtors =
𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠 × 𝐶𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑑
360 3,83,333 6,35,000 9,00,000 11,58,333 14,10,000
Interest on Average
Debtors @ 20% 76,667 1,27,000 1,80,000 2,31,667 2,82,000
Net Benefit (Profit –
Interest) 3,23,333 3,93,000 4,20,000 4,08,333 3,78,000
Conclusion: The Company may choose Policy B to maximize Net Benefit.
Solution 17:
Statement showing evaluation of Credit Policies
(Amount in lakhs)
Particulars Present (₹.) Proposed Policy (₹.)
Option I Option II
A Expected Profit:
(a) Credit Sales 180 220 280
(b) Total Cost other than Bad Debts:
Variable Costs (60%) 108 132 168
(c) Bad Debts 6 18 38
(d) Expected Profit [(a)-(b)-(c)] 66 70 74
B Opportunity Cost of Investment in Debtors (Refer workings) 6.75 10.31 17.5
C Net Benefits [A - B] 59.25 59.69 56.5
Recommendation: The Proposed Policy I should be adopted since the net benefits under this policy is higher
than those under other policies.
Workings:
Calculation of Opportunity Cost of Investment in Debtors
𝐶𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑑* 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑅𝑒𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑛
Opportunity Cost = Total Cost x 12
x 100
Solution 18:
Particulars Present (₹) Proposed Policy (₹)
Sales (18,90,000 ÷ 21 = 90,000 units) 18,90,000 23,62,500
Proposed Sales (90,000 units + 25% = 1,12,500 units
at ₹ 21 p.u.)
Less: Variable Cost at ₹ 14 p.u. 12,60,000 15,75,000
Contribution 6,30,000 7,87,500
Cost of Debtors p.a. (Variable Cost only) 12,60,000 15,75,000
Average Collection Period 1 Month 2 Months
Solution 19:
Particulars Present (₹) Proposed Policy (₹)
60,000 + 25% = 75,000
Sales Quantity 60,000 units units
60,000 × 100 =
Sales Value at ₹ 100 p.u. 60,00,000 75,000 × 100 = 75,00,000
Less: Variable Costs at ₹ 80 p.u. 60,000 × 80 = 48,00,000 75,000 × 80 = 60,00,000
Contribution 12,00,000 15,00,000
Less: Fixed Costs at ₹ 10 p.u. of present
sales 60,000 × 10 = 6,00,000 60,000 × 10 = 6,00,000
Profit 6,00,000 9,00,000
Cost of Debtors p.a. = Total Cost (VC +
FC) 54,00,000 66,00,000
Average Collection Period 1 month 2 months
Average Debtors =
𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠 × 𝐶𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑑
12 4,50,000 11,00,000
Interest on Average Debtors at 20% 90,000 2,20,000
Net Benefit (Profit – Interest) 5,10,000 6,80,000
Conclusion: There is an increase in Net Benefit by ₹ 1,70,000. So, the relaxation of credit standards is justified.
Workings:
1. Collection from debtors: (Amount in ₹.)
Year 2020 Year 2021
Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. April May June
Total sales 2,00,000 2,20,000 2,40,000 60,000 80,000 1,00,000 1,20,000 80,000 60,000
Credit sales (75% of 1,50,000 1,65,000 1,80,000 45,000 60,000 75,000 90,000 60,000 45,000
total sales)
Collections: 90,000
One month 99,000 1,08,000 27,000 36,000 45,000 54,000 36,000
Two months 45,000 49,500 54,000 13,500 18,000 22,500 27,000
Three months 15,000 16,500 18,000 4,500 6,000 7,500
Total collections 1,72,500 97,500 67,500 67,500 82,500 70,500
Solution 4:
Projected Profit and Loss Account for the year 3 (₹ In Lakhs)
Year 2 Year 3 Year 2 Year 3
Particulars (Actual) (Projected) Particulars (Actual) (Projected)
To Materials
consumed 350 420 By Sales 1,000 1,200
By
Miscellaneous
To Stores 120 144 Income 10 10
To Manufacturing
Expenses 160 192
To Other
expenses 100 150
To Depreciation 100 100
To Net Profit 180 204
1,010 1,210 1,010 1,210
Cash Flow
Particulars Amount (₹ In lakhs)
Profit 204
Add: Depreciation 100
304
Less: Cash required for increase in stock (50)
Net Cash Inflow 254
Available for servicing the loan: 75% of ₹ 2,54,00,000 = ₹ 1,90,50,000
Working Notes:
(i) Material consumed in year 2: 35% of sales.
35
Likely consumption in year 3: ₹ 1,200 × 100 or ₹ 420 (Lakhs)
(ii) Stores are 12% of sales, as in year 2.
(iii) Manufacturing expenses are 16% of sales.
Solution 6:
Cash Budget
Particulars Jan (₹) Feb (₹) March (₹) April (₹) May (₹) June (₹) Total (₹)
Receipts:
Cash sales 36,000 48,500 43,000 44,300 51,250 54,350 2,77,400
Collections from
debtors - 36,000 48,500 43,000 44,300 51,250 2,23,050
Bank loan - - - - 30,000 30,000
Total Receipts (A) 36,000 84,500 91,500 87,300 1,25,550 1,05,600 5,30,450
Payments:
Materials - 25,000 31,000 25,500 30,600 37,000 1,49,100
Salaries and
wages 10,000 12,100 10,600 25,000 22,000 23,000 1,02,700
Production
overheads - 6,000 6,300 6,000 6,500 8,000 32,800
Office & selling
overheads - 5,500 6,700 7,500 8,900 11,000 39,600
Sales Commission 2,160 2,910 2,580 2,658 3,075 3,261 16,644
Capital
expenditure - 8,000 - 25,000 - - 33,000
Dividend - - - - - 35,000 35,000
Total Payments
(B) 12,160 59,510 57,180 91,658 71,075 1,17,261 4,08,844
New cash flow (A)
– (B) 23,840 24,990 34,320 (4,358) 54,475 (11,661) 1,21,606
Balance at the
beginning of
month 72,500 96,340 1,21,330 1,55,650 1,51,292 2,05,767 1,94,106
Balance at the end
of month 96,340 1,21,330 1,55,650 1,51,292 2,05,767 1,94,106 3,15,712
Solution 9:
Cash Budget for the months of June, July, August and September
August September
Particulars June (₹) July (₹) (₹) (₹)
Opening Balance 45,000 45,500 45,500 45,000
Add: Receipts
Cash Sales (20% of respective month's
Sales) 1,00,000 98,000 1,08,000 1,22,000
Collection from Debtors 3,48,000 3,80,000 3,96,000 4,12,000
Interest on Investments 25,000 - - -
Total Receipts (A) 5,18,000 5,23,500 5,49,500 5,79,000
Payments:
Creditors (2 months) April paid in June, and so
on. 2,00,000 2,10,000 2,60,000 2,82,000
Wages (½ of previous month + ½ of Current
month) 1,62,500 1,65,000 1,65,000 1,67,500
Overheads (1 month), previous month expenses
paid now 40,000 38,000 37,500 60,800
Interest on Debentures (6% on ₹ 5,00,000) 30,000 - - -
Instalment on Machinery (₹ 4,00,000 ÷ 20
months) - 20,000 20,000 20,000
Advance Tax - - 15,000 -
Total Payments (B) 4,32,500 4,33,000 4,97,500 5,30,300
Closing Balance before investment in FD (A) –
(B) 85,500 90,500 52,000 48,700
Investment in Fixed Deposit (multiples of 1,000)
(Balancing Figure) 40,000 45,000 7,000 3,000
Closing Balance (required around ₹ 45,000) 45,500 45,500 45,000 45,700
Working Notes:
Computation of Collection from Debtors
Particulars April (₹) May (₹) June (₹) July (₹) August (₹) September (₹)
Total Sales 4,20,000 4,50,000 5,00,000 4,90,000 5,40,000 6,10,000
Cash Sales 84,000 90,000 1,00,000 98,000 1,08,000 1,22,000
Credit Sales 3,36,000 3,60,000 4,00,000 3,92,000 4,32,000 4,88,000
Receipt:
50% 1,68,000 1,80,000 2,00,000 1,96,000 2,16,000
50% 1,68,000 1,80,000 2,00,000 1,96,000
Total Receipts 3,48,000 3,80,000 3,96,000 4,12,000
Solution 12:
Monthly Cash Budget (April-September)
April May June July August September
Opening cash balance - 10,50,000 - 1,37,500 5,25,000 7,25,000
A. Cash inflows
Equity shares 50,00,000 - - - - -
Loans (Refer to working 6,50,000 1,25,000 - - - -
note 1)
Receipt from Debtors - - 15,00,000 17,50,000 17,50,000 20,00,000
Total (A) 56,50,000 11,75,000 15,00,000 18,87,500 22,75,000 27,25,000
B. Cash Outflows
Plant and Machinery 10,00,000 - - - - -
Long-term loans
Sundry creditors
Accrued interest
Outstanding
expenses
97,75,000 97,75,000
Working Notes:
Subsequent Borrowings Needed (₹)
April May June July August September
A. Cash Inflow
Equity shares 50,00,000
Loans 6,50,000
Receipt from debtors
- - 15,00,000 17,50,000 17,50,000 20,00,000
Total (A) 56,50,000 - 15,00,000 17,50,000 17,50,000 20,00,000
B. Cash Outflow
Purchase of fixed
40,00,000
assets
Stock 5,00,000
Miscellaneous
50,000
expenses
Payment to creditors - 10,25,000 12,12,500 12,12,500 14,00,000 14,00,000
Wages and salaries - 1,00,000 1,00,000 1,00,000 1,00,000 1,00,000
Administrative
expenses 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
Total 46,00,000 11,75,000 13,62,500 13,62,500 15,50,000 15,50,000
Surplus/ (Deficit) 10,50,000 (11,75,000) 1,37,500 3,87,500 2,00,000 4,50,000
Cumulative balance 10,50,000 (1,25,000) 12,500 4,00,000 6,00,000 10,50,000
1. There is shortage of cash in May of ₹ 1,25,000 which will be met by borrowings in May.
2. Payment to Creditors
Purchases = Cost of goods sold - Wages and salaries
Purchases for April = (75% of 15,00,000) - ₹ 1,00,000 = ₹ 10,25,000
(Note: Since gross margin is 25% of sales, cost of manufacture i.e. materials plus wages and salaries should
be 75% of sales)
Hence, Purchases = Cost of manufacture minus wages and salaries of ₹ 1,00,000) The creditors are paid in the
first month following purchases.
Therefore, payment in May is ₹ 10,25,000
The same procedure will be followed for other months.
April (75% of 15,00,000) - ₹ 1,00,000 = ₹ 10,25,000
May (75% of 17,50,000) - ₹ 1,00,000 = ₹ 12,12,500
June (75% of 17,50,000) - ₹ 1,00,000 = ₹ 12,12,500
July (75% of 20,00,000) - ₹ 1,00,000 = ₹ 14,00,000
Solution 19:
(i) Total time saving = 3 & ½ days
Time savings × Daily average collection = Reduction in cash balances achieved
3 & ½ days × ₹ 5,00,000 = ₹ 17,50,000
(iii) Since the opportunity cost of the present system (₹ 87,500) exceeds the cost of the lock box
system (₹ 80,000), the system should be initiated.
Solution 20:
Computation of Savings in Interest Cost:
₹7,30,00,000
Sales per week = 50 𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑘𝑠 = ₹ 14,60,000
Solution 21:
Cleared Funds Forecast
7 Aug 20 8 Aug 20 9 Aug 20 10 Aug 20 11 Aug 20
(Friday) (Saturday) (Sunday) (Monday) (Tuesday)
₹ ₹ ₹ ₹ ₹
Receipts
W Ltd 1,30,000 0 0 0 0
X Ltd 0 0 0 1,80,000 0
(a) 1,30,000 0 0 1,80,000 0
A Ltd 45,000 0 0 0 0
B Ltd 0 0 75,000 0 0
C Ltd 0 0 95,000 0 0
Wages 0 0 0 0 12,000
Salaries 56,000 0 0 0 0
Petty Cash 200 0 0 0 0
Stationery 0 0 300 0 0
(b) 1,01,200 0 1,70,300 0 12,000
Cleared excess Receipts over payments (a) – (b) 28,800 0 (1,70,300) 1,80,000 (12,000)
Cleared balance b/f 2,00,000 2,28,800 2,28,800 58,500 2,38,500
Cleared balance c/f (c) 2,28,800 2,28,800 58,500 2,38,500 2,26,500
Uncleared funds float
Receipts 1,80,000 1,80,000 1,80,000 0 0
Payments (1,70,000) (1,70,300) 0 (6,500) (6,500)
(d) 10,000 9,700 1,80,000 (6,500) (6,500)
Total book balance c/f 2,38,800 2,38,500 2,38,500 2,32,000 2,20,000
(c) + (d)