Higher Nationals (RQF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
INTERNAL VERIFICATION – ASSESSMENT DECISIONS
Programme title Pearson BTEC Level 5 Higher National Diploma in Aeronautical Engineering
Unit Number and
Name
U-24, Aerodynamics
Examine properties of atmosphere, aerodynamic principles, generation, nature, effect of aerodynamic forces, high
Assignment title
speed airflow, effects, nature and methods of to control and stabilize fixed wing aircraft.
Assessor Abdur Rahman Internal Verifier Arafat Rahman
State why the assessment
decision is inaccurate.
Name of Learner(s) Submission List the assessment
List which assessment and grading Assessment
and grading criteria *If an inaccurate decision is recorded the
(If a larger sample is Type criteria the Assessor has awarded. Decision
required please add rows (First, where inaccurate Internal Verifier must recommend actions
Please state specific criteria and Accurate detailing the issues to be addressed. The
or use Resubmission
not an overall grade (Y/N) decisions have been
additional sheets) , Retake) Assessor and the Internal Verifier must
made then confirm that the action has been
undertaken before assessment decisions
are issued to learners.
P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8,
Rifat Jahan Mim 1st Y N/A N/A
M1, M2, M3, M4, D1,D2, D3, D4
Md. Raisul Islam
1st NIL Y N/A N/A
Sakib
P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8,
Aklima Akter Poly 1st Y N/A N/A
M1, M2, M3, M4, D1,D2,
P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8,
Alauddin 1st Y N/A N/A
M1, M2, M3, M4, D1,D2, D3, D4
Nuzhat Tasneem NIL Y N/A N/A
Shahjalal Ahmed
INACTIVE INACTIVE INACTIVE
Preetom
Andalib Mahmud Alif NIL Y N/A N/A
Higher Nationals (RQF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
INTERNAL VERIFIER’S CHECKLIST Y/N
Has every learner and the Assessor confirmed the authenticity of the evidence?
Is there evidence of collusion or plagiarism?
Does the assessment feedback to each learner:
● Link to relevant assessment criteria
● Justify each assessment criterion awarded
● Provide appropriate guidance to the learner without giving specific actions for improvement
GENERAL COMMENTS (if appropriate)
Any actions required must be reviewed across the whole cohort.
Target Date for
Action Required
Completion
I confirm that the assessment decisions are accurate, there is no evidence of assessment malpractice and any action points have been
addressed and completed in respect of the whole cohort.
Internal Verifier signature Date
Assessor signature Date
Lead Internal Verifier signature
Date
(if appropriate)
INTERNAL VERIFICATION – ASSESSMENT DECISIONS
Programme title Pearson BTEC Level 5 Higher National Diploma in Aeronautical Engineering
Unit Number and
Name
U-26, Aircraft Mechanical Systems
Assignment title Explore how the design and operation of hydraulic systems contribute to safe flight.
Assessor M. Moslem Uddin Internal Verifier Ashikur Rahman
State why the assessment
decision is inaccurate.
Name of Learner(s) Submission List the assessment *If an inaccurate decision is recorded the
List which assessment and grading Assessment
and grading criteria
(If a larger sample is Type criteria the Assessor has awarded. Decision Internal Verifier must recommend actions
required please add rows (First,
Please state specific criteria and Accurate where inaccurate detailing the issues to be addressed. The
or use Resubmission
not an overall grade (Y/N) decisions have been Assessor and the Internal Verifier must
additional sheets) , Retake) made then confirm that the action has been
undertaken before assessment decisions
are issued to learners.
Rifat Jahan Mim 1st P1, P2, M1, D1, Y N/A N/A
Md. Raisul Islam
1st NIL Y N/A N/A
Sakib
Aklima Akter Poly 1st P1, P2, M1,D1 Y N/A N/A
Alauddin 1st P1, P2, M1, Y N/A N/A
Nuzhat Tasneem NIL Y N/A N/A
Shahjalal Ahmed
INACTIVE INACTIVE INACTIVE
Preetom
Andalib Mahmud Alif NIL Y N/A N/A
Higher Nationals (RQF)
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
INTERNAL VERIFIER’S CHECKLIST Y/N
Has every learner and the Assessor confirmed the authenticity of the evidence?
Is there evidence of collusion or plagiarism?
Does the assessment feedback to each learner:
● Link to relevant assessment criteria
● Justify each assessment criterion awarded
● Provide appropriate guidance to the learner without giving specific actions for improvement
GENERAL COMMENTS (if appropriate)
Any actions required must be reviewed across the whole cohort.
Target Date for
Action Required
Completion
I confirm that the assessment decisions are accurate, there is no evidence of assessment malpractice and any action points have been
addressed and completed in respect of the whole cohort.
Internal Verifier signature Ashikur Rahamn Date
Assessor signature M. Moslem Uddin Date
Lead Internal Verifier signature
Date
(if appropriate)
Higher Nationals (RQF)
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
INTERNAL VERIFICATION – ASSESSMENT DECISIONS
Programme title Pearson BTEC Level 5 Higher National Diploma in Aeronautical Engineering
Unit Number and
Name
U-56,Aircraft Propulsion Principles & Technology
Assignment title Construction function & operation of piston engine systems
Assessor M. Moslem Uddin Internal Verifier Zahidul Islam
State why the assessment
decision is inaccurate.
Submissio List which assessment and List the assessment and
Name of Learner(s) Assessment *If an inaccurate decision is recorded the
(If a larger sample is required
n Type grading criteria the Assessor Decision grading criteria where
has awarded. Please state Internal Verifier must recommend actions
(First, Accurate
please add rows or use
specific criteria and not an inaccurate decisions have detailing the issues to be addressed. The
Resubmission (Y/N)
additional sheets) been made Assessor and the Internal Verifier must
, Retake) overall grade
then confirm that the action has been
undertaken before assessment decisions
are issued to learners.
P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7,
Rifat Jahan Mim 1st Y N/A N/A
P8, M1, M2, M3, D2
Md. Raisul Islam Sakib 1st NIL Y N/A N/A
1st P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7,
Aklima Akter Poly Y N/A N/A
P8, M1,
1st P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7,
Alauddin Y N/A N/A
P8, M1,
Nuzhat Tasneem 1st P1, P2, P3, P4, P7, P8, Y N/A N/A
Shahjalal Ahmed
INACTIVE INACTIVE INACTIVE
Preetom
1st P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7,
Andalib Mahmud Alif Y N/A N/A
P8, M1,M3, M4
Higher Nationals (RQF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
INTERNAL VERIFIER’S CHECKLIST Y/N
Has every learner and the Assessor confirmed the authenticity of the evidence?
Is there evidence of collusion or plagiarism?
Does the assessment feedback to each learner:
● Link to relevant assessment criteria
● Justify each assessment criterion awarded
● Provide appropriate guidance to the learner without giving specific actions for improvement
GENERAL COMMENTS (if appropriate)
Any actions required must be reviewed across the whole cohort.
Target Date for
Action Required
Completion
I confirm that the assessment decisions are accurate, there is no evidence of assessment malpractice and any action points have been
addressed and completed in respect of the whole cohort.
Internal Verifier signature Zahidul Islam Date
Assessor signature M. Moslem Uddin Date
Lead Internal Verifier signature
Date
(if appropriate)
Higher Nationals (RQF)
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
INTERNAL VERIFICATION – ASSESSMENT DECISIONS
Programme title Pearson BTEC Level 5 Higher National Diploma in Aeronautical Engineering
Unit Number and
Name
U-59, Aircraft Gas Turbine Engine Design and Performance
Gas turbine engine performance, using thermo-fluid principles and propulsion cycle efficiencies. Design and
performance of aircraft gas turbine engine turbo machinery. design and performance of aircraft gas turbine engine
Assignment title
intake, combustion and exhaust modules.
factors affecting the design, performance and environmental impact of gas turbine powered aircraft operation
Assessor M. Moslem Uddin Internal Verifier Ashikur Rahman
State why the assessment
decision is inaccurate.
Name of Learner(s) Submission List the assessment *If an inaccurate decision is recorded the
List which assessment and grading Assessment
and grading criteria
(If a larger sample is Type criteria the Assessor has awarded. Decision Internal Verifier must recommend actions
required please add rows (First,
Please state specific criteria and Accurate where inaccurate detailing the issues to be addressed. The
or use Resubmission
not an overall grade (Y/N) decisions have been Assessor and the Internal Verifier must
additional sheets) , Retake) made then confirm that the action has been
undertaken before assessment decisions
are issued to learners.
P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8,
Rifat Jahan Mim 1st Y N/A N/A
M1, M2, M3, M4, D1,D2, D3, D4
Md. Raisul Islam
1st NIL Y N/A N/A
Sakib
P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8,
Aklima Akter Poly 1st Y N/A N/A
M1, M2, M3, M4, D1,D2,
P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8,
Alauddin 1st Y N/A N/A
M1, M2, M3, M4, D1,D2, D3, D4
Nuzhat Tasneem NIL Y N/A N/A
Shahjalal Ahmed
INACTIVE INACTIVE INACTIVE
Preetom
Andalib Mahmud Alif NIL Y N/A N/A
Higher Nationals (RQF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
INTERNAL VERIFIER’S CHECKLIST Y/N
Has every learner and the Assessor confirmed the authenticity of the evidence?
Is there evidence of collusion or plagiarism?
Does the assessment feedback to each learner:
● Link to relevant assessment criteria
● Justify each assessment criterion awarded
● Provide appropriate guidance to the learner without giving specific actions for improvement
GENERAL COMMENTS (if appropriate)
Any actions required must be reviewed across the whole cohort.
Target Date for
Action Required
Completion
I confirm that the assessment decisions are accurate, there is no evidence of assessment malpractice and any action points have been
addressed and completed in respect of the whole cohort.
Internal Verifier signature Date
Assessor signature Date
Lead Internal Verifier
signature Date
(if appropriate)
Higher Nationals (RQF)
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
INTERNAL VERIFICATION – ASSESSMENT DECISIONS
Programme title Pearson BTEC Level 5 Higher National Diploma in Aeronautical Engineering
Unit Number and
Name
U-59, Aircraft Gas Turbine Engine Design and Performance
Gas turbine engine performance, using thermo-fluid principles and propulsion cycle efficiencies. Design and
performance of aircraft gas turbine engine turbo machinery. design and performance of aircraft gas turbine engine
Assignment title
intake, combustion and exhaust modules.
factors affecting the design, performance and environmental impact of gas turbine powered aircraft operation
Assessor M. Moslem Uddin Internal Verifier Ashikur Rahman
State why the assessment
decision is inaccurate.
Name of Learner(s) Submission List the assessment *If an inaccurate decision is recorded the
List which assessment and grading Assessment
and grading criteria
(If a larger sample is Type criteria the Assessor has awarded. Decision Internal Verifier must recommend actions
required please add rows (First,
Please state specific criteria and Accurate where inaccurate detailing the issues to be addressed. The
or use Resubmission
not an overall grade (Y/N) decisions have been Assessor and the Internal Verifier must
additional sheets) , Retake) made then confirm that the action has been
undertaken before assessment decisions
are issued to learners.
P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8,
Rifat Jahan Mim 1st Y N/A N/A
M1, M2, M3, M4, D1,D2, D3, D4
Md. Raisul Islam
1st NIL Y N/A N/A
Sakib
P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8,
Aklima Akter Poly 1st Y N/A N/A
M1, M2, M3, M4, D1,D2,
P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8,
Alauddin 1st Y N/A N/A
M1, M2, M3, M4, D1,D2, D3, D4
Nuzhat Tasneem NIL Y N/A N/A
Shahjalal Ahmed
INACTIVE INACTIVE INACTIVE
Preetom
Andalib Mahmud Alif NIL Y N/A N/A
Higher Nationals (RQF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
INTERNAL VERIFIER’S CHECKLIST Y/N
Has every learner and the Assessor confirmed the authenticity of the evidence?
Is there evidence of collusion or plagiarism?
Does the assessment feedback to each learner:
● Link to relevant assessment criteria
● Justify each assessment criterion awarded
● Provide appropriate guidance to the learner without giving specific actions for improvement
GENERAL COMMENTS (if appropriate)
Any actions required must be reviewed across the whole cohort.
Target Date for
Action Required
Completion
I confirm that the assessment decisions are accurate, there is no evidence of assessment malpractice and any action points have been
addressed and completed in respect of the whole cohort.
Internal Verifier signature Date
Assessor signature Date
Lead Internal Verifier
signature Date
(if appropriate)
Higher Nationals (RQF)
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
INTERNAL VERIFIER’S CHECKLIST Y/N
Has every learner and the Assessor confirmed the authenticity of the evidence?
Is there evidence of collusion or plagiarism?
Does the assessment feedback to each learner:
● Link to relevant assessment criteria
● Justify each assessment criterion awarded
● Provide appropriate guidance to the learner without giving specific actions for improvement
GENERAL COMMENTS (if appropriate)
Any actions required must be reviewed across the whole cohort.
Target Date for
Action Required
Completion
I confirm that the assessment decisions are accurate, there is no evidence of assessment malpractice and any action points have been
addressed and completed in respect of the whole cohort.
Internal Verifier signature Date
Assessor signature Date
Lead Internal Verifier
signature Date
(if appropriate)
