Post
Post
E EDSE TN O
T R
I SATTR IY V E D E N T I S T R Y
Clinical Relevance: Before introducing new post systems into clinical practice, POST FAILURE
dentists need to be able to understand the scientific principles involved in their clinical
performance in order to evaluate the claimed advantages of these alternatives to
It is acknowledged that posts can
established systems. weaken roots and lead to root fracture.
The important factors predisposing to
root fracture are:
ADVANTAGES OF METAL than the metal post group. carbon-fibre posts have been judged to
POST SYSTEMS be biocompatible;30,31 however, this does
Metal post systems have a number of not necessarily apply to the dentine
advantages: Aesthetics bonding systems or resin-based luting
A metal post alters the transmission of cements.
light through the tooth, and may show
History through the root.23 This effect will be
Metal posts have a well established more apparent where the gingival tissues POST TYPES
record of successful clinical service. are thin. If a non-precious post has been The metal-free alternatives currently
High success rates have been reported placed, corrosion products may pass into available can be broadly divided into
from retrospective studies over periods the root, discolouring it.24 Where all- either composite materials or ceramics.
of time that have not yet been matched ceramic restorations are used, a metal
by non-metal systems.17,18 core will alter the optical properties of the
overlying restoration.25 A number of Composites
techniques have been described to mask Composite materials are composed of
Adaptability the metal core, all of which involve fibres of carbon or silica surrounded by a
Cast posts with integral cast cores can further technical steps, and varying matrix of polymer resin, usually an epoxy
compensate for disparities between the degrees of success.26 However, masking resin. The philosophy behind the use of
angulation of the root and the planned the core alone will not alter root these materials lies in the belief that a
crown. discoloration. post should mimic the dentine of the root
in its physical properties, distribute the
stresses imposed on the restored tooth in
Core Retention Post Removal a more favourable way, and thereby
Cast posts with cores do not have the All teeth to be restored with posts should reduce the incidence of root fracture. In
potential for separation or breakdown have been endodontically treated. Should addition, if the material of the post is
that may occur between prefabricated the endodontic treatment fail, an slightly weaker than the root containing
posts and their cores. Stud attachments orthograde approach is considered to it, then the post will fracture preferentially
may more readily be joined to cast yield a higher success rate than and the root may then be re-restored.
posts. apicectomy and retrograde filling alone.27 While it may be beneficial for the post to
Removal of a long metal post to permit match the flexural modulus of the dentine,
this can be difficult, if not impossible, and it would appear to be equally important
Strength may result in root fracture. for the luting material at the interface of
Cast metals have greater strength in thin these materials to be able to flex
section than the composite adjacent to harmoniously.
fibre posts. This allows the production Biocompatibility
of ferrules, or diaphragms. Non-precious metals show corrosion Carbon-Fibre Posts
within the root. Using amalgam as a core A number of such posts are available
in combination with a prefabricated post currently: these are discussed below.
DISADVANTAGES OF METAL may set up galvanic currents and Composipost (R.T.D. France: UK source
POST SYSTEMS promote further corrosion. The corrosion Dental 21, Boreham, Essex). This system
However, these systems also have their products can pass through the dentine of was introduced in 1990 following
drawbacks: the root28 and have also been implicated research undertaken by Duret and
as a cause of root fracture.29 Ceramic and associates in France.32 Figure 1 shows
Root Fracture
The incidence of root fracture may be
reduced19,20 or may occur in a more a b
damaging manner21,22 when fibre rather
than metal posts are placed. In a
retrospective 4-year clinical study
comparing teeth restored using either
cast metal posts and cores or a carbon-
fibre system,19 the teeth with metal posts
suffered root fractures in 9% of cases
whilst the fibre post group had none and Figure 1. An early design of Composipost, being used with a composite core.
overall were significantly more successful
may occur.
The post space needs to be clear of
debris. The presence of a eugenol-
containing root canal sealer can
inhibit curing, leading to reduced
retention and increased coronal
leakage. Acid etching and the
additional use of ethanol will
prevent this.47
Figure 11. Preparation of the post space and Etching of the whole of the canal Figure 13. An endodontic irrigation syringe and
trial of a glass-fibre post. needs to be ensured, as does the needle used to improve removal of etchant and
correct duration of etching. A small- debris.
diameter spiral interdental brush will
post is adjusted by using a diamond effectively place etching gel
disc to remove the excess from the throughout the prepared post space different from that of the fibre posts, and
coronal end. The Fiber White posts (see (Figure 12). this mismatch may cause stresses
above), being completely parallel and All of the etchant must be washed between core and post. The stresses
having a shaped head, are adjusted from out and the canal dried correctly. To caused by micromovement of the post
the apical end before insertion. achieve this requires a careful can lead to problems of microleakage. It
It is intended that all of the non-metal technique, and simply using an air/ is suggested, however, that composite is
posts be luted with an adhesive resin. water syringe may be ineffective, a good choice as a core material where
The dentine sides of the post space are reducing the potential for there is substantial coronal tooth
therefore etched and washed, and excess successful cementation.35 structure remaining.49
moisture removed consistent with the Endodontic irrigation needles are
aims of the wet-bonding technique. A useful for improving the removal of
self-curing bonding material is placed etchant (Figure 13). Some luting ADVANTAGES OF NON-
into the canal, followed by the self-curing resin systems do not require a METAL POST SYSTEMS
luting cement. Some cement is placed separate etching stage and may A major advantage of fibre posts is that
around the post itself, which is then therefore be easier to use. the technique for removing them (with
inserted, and excess cement removed. The luting cement must be placed rotary instruments) in the event of
Once the post cement is cured a core carefully to coat the entire canal fracture or need for endodontic
material, usually resin composite, can wall, and the post inserted quickly retreatment is much simpler than that
then be built up around the post. For a to ensure full seating before curing
ceramic post the ceramic core may be commences.34 Refrigerating the
fabricated indirectly, heat-pressed onto luting composite will extend the
the post or fabricated separately and then working time.
cemented. A direct core of composite is
also suggested as a suitable alternative A light-curing restorative composite
technique. can then be built up to form a core
Realizing the potential of resin (Figures 14 and 15). Composite is
composites requires very careful usually envisaged as the direct core
technique and several stages are material to be used in conjunction with
involved, at any one of which problems these prefabricated posts. The physical
properties and behaviour of resin
Figure 14. Core build-up with light-curing
composite, however, are not ideal for composite.
this purpose:
needed to remove metal posts.50 With this type of test does not mimic the are many and varied combinations of
glass-fibre posts there is also an pattern of loading occurring in vivo, a resins and reinforcements being
aesthetic advantage. Zirconia ceramic number of investigators have used developed industrially and it is likely
posts also have good aesthetics but fatigue testing, in which the post that the non-metal posts introduced to
may prove difficult – or impossible – to systems are subjected to intermittent dentistry so far will continue to be
remove. loading at lower levels. Such studies modified and evolve alongside their
In comparison with non-precious found fewer failures with carbon-fibre industrial counterparts.
posts, non-metal systems undergo no posts53,20 than with metal or zirconium
corrosion and are more biocompatible. posts.
A possible goal of using dentine- A number of clinical studies show
bonding agents to cement a post would promising results for both fibre posts54 REFERENCES
be to unite the encircling dentine with the and ceramic posts.46 These are short- 1. Ring ME. The eighteenth century. In: Dentistry; An
Illustrated History 2nd edn. New York: Abradale
post and thereby reinforce the root. This term results, however, and the success Press/Harry N. Abrams, 1992; pp.160–166.
would be particularly advantageous of a post-retained restoration depends 2. Kantor ME, Pines MS. A comparative study of
where no dentine remains supragingivally on a number of factors, which were not restorative techniques for pulpless teeth. J Prosthet
Dent 1977; 38: 405–412.
around which to place a conventional recorded in these studies. It must also
3. Trabert KC, Caputo AA, Abou-Rass M. Tooth
ferrule. Two in vitro studies suggest that be recalled that high success rates were fracture: a comparison of endodontic and
this can occur;40,51 however, fracture reported with earlier post systems. restorative treatments. J Endodont 1978; 4: 341–
studies21 suggest that adhesively Therefore, while these studies are 346.
4. Guzy GP, Nicholls JI. In vitro comparison of intact
cemented posts fail at lower loads than encouraging, more information is needed endodontically treated teeth with and without
unrestored teeth, and it is not known for to enable firm conclusions to be drawn, endo-post reinforcement. J Prosthet Dent 1979;
how long such a union might last in and to establish whether the advantages 42: 39–44.
vivo. If non-metal posts can be reliably of non-metal posts are accompanied by 5. Trope M, Maltz DO, Tronstad L. Resistance to
fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth.
retained by resin adhesives, traditional high rates of success. Endodont Dent Traumatol 1985; 1: 108–111.
mechanical retentive features would be 6. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intra-coronal
less important and shorter, tapered reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of
posts could be employed. SUMMARY endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984;
51: 780–784.
The introduction of non-metal post 7. Tjan AH, Wang SB. Resistance to root fracture of
systems has initiated a mass of research dowel channels with various thicknesses of buccal
RESEARCH activity. Results from this research and dentin walls. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53: 496–500.
8. Lloyd PM, Palik JF. The philosophies of dowel
A wealth of research papers is currently from clinical data suggest that these
diameter preparation: a literature review. J Prosthet
being produced in an attempt to systems can be safely introduced into Dent 1993; 69: 32–36.
elucidate how well recently introduced clinical practice. However, the 9. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of
post systems perform and thereby aid interpretation of this, sometimes endodontic dowels: effects of cement, dowel
length, diameter and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978;
the clinician in making valid treatment conflicting, information is not easy and
38: 400–405.
choices. As stated above, it is requires caution. Further research is 10. Cooney JP, Caputo AA, Trabert KC. Retention and
suggested that fibre posts will succeed required to establish whether rigid or stress distribution of tapered-end endodontic
by having flexibility comparable with resilient posts function better. It is also posts. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55: 540–546.
11. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Holcomb JP, Trabert KC.
that of dentine in order that they may essential to consider that the post- The retentive and stress distributing properties of
function in harmony with the tooth;32 crown restoration is a system which, as a threaded endodontic dowel. J Prosthet Dent
other investigators, however, report that described by Smith et al.,55 consists of 1980; 44: 398–404.
the stiffness of carbon-fibre posts is the post, the core material and the luting 12. Holmes DC, Diaz-Arnold AM, Leary JM. Influence
of post dimension on stress distribution in dentin.
similar to that of metal posts.31,52 cement. To this should be added the J Prosthet Dent 1996; 75: 140–147.
Zirconia posts, on the other hand, are overlying crown, and the functional 13. Isidor F, Brondum K, Ravnholt G. The influence of
designed to succeed by being more rigid occlusal load. All of these elements post length and crown ferrule length on the
than and stronger than most metal influence the success of the whole resistance to cyclic loading of bovine teeth with
prefabricated titanium posts. Int J Prosthet Dent
posts. 52 restoration, and focusing attention on 1999; 12: 78–82.
A popular means of evaluating posts only one is inappropriate and 14. Roberts DH. The relationship between age and
is to load them at an angle progressively misleading. the failure rate of bridge prostheses. Br Dent J
1970; 128: 175–177.
until failure occurs, which is often by Clinicians would be well advised to
15. Lewis R, Smith BG. A clinical survey of failed post
fracture of the root. In these tests, fibre continue to follow existing retained crowns. Br Dent J 1988; 165: 95–97.
posts often fail at lower loads than steel recommendations as to post selection, 16. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant
or cast gold posts,21 although the loads core fabrication and crown design: factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52:
28–35.
at failure exceed those that would reliance on as-yet unproven attributes
17. Weine FS,Wax AH,Wenckus CS. Retrospective
normally occur clinically, and the mode of new post systems will not study of tapered smooth post systems in place for
of failure is usually less disastrous. As compensate for poor technique. There 10 years or more. J Endodont 1991; 17: 293–297.
18. Bergman B, Lundquist P, Sjögren U, Sundquist G. ceramic in vivo. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 322–326. 43. Simon MH, Paffrath J. Neue Perspektiven zur
Restorative and endodontic results after 31. Torbjorner A, Karlsson S, Syverud M, Hensen- vollkeramischen Stabilisierung und zum Aufbau
treatment with cast posts and cores. J Prosthet Petersen A. Carbon reinforced root canal posts; devitaler Zahne. Quintessenz 1995; 46: 1085–1101.
Dent 1989; 61: 10–15. mechanical and cytotoxic properties. Eur J Oral 44. Internal results. Liechtenstein: Ivoclar AG, Schaan,
19. Ferrari M,Vichi A, Garcia-Gody F. Clinical Sci 1996; 104: 605–611. 1998.
evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts 32. Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. A new concept of 45. Sandhaus S, Pasche K. Tenon radiculaire en
and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 15B– corono-radicular reconstruction: the zircone pour la realisation d’inlays-cores tout
18B. Composipost. Chir Dent Fr 1990; 60: 69–77. ceramique. Tribune Dent 1994; 2: 17–24.
20. Isidor F, Odman P, Brondum K. Intermittent 33. Malquarti G, Berruet RG, Bois D. Prosthetic use 46. Kakehashi Y, Luthy H, Naef N, Wohlwend A,
loading of teeth restored using prefabricated of carbon fibre-reinforced epoxy resin for Scharer P. A new all ceramic post and core
carbon fibre posts. Int J Prosthodont 1996; 9: 131– esthetic crowns and fixed partial dentures. J system: clinical, technical, and in vitro results. Int J
136. Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 251–257. Periodont Restor Dent 1998; 18: 587–593.
21. Sidoli GE, King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro 34. Mendoza DB, Eakle WS. Retention of posts 47. Tjan AH, Nemetz H. Effect of eugenol containing
evaluation of a carbon fibre based post and core cemented with various dentinal bonding agents. J endodontic sealer on the retention of
system. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78: 5–9. Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 591–594. prefabricated posts luted with an adhesive
22. Mannocci F, Ferrari M. Intermittent loading of 35. Rovatti L, Dallari A. Endocomposipost and composite resin cement. Quint Int 1992; 23: 839–
teeth restored using “quartz fibre”, “carbon Endopost: research and clinical experience. In: 844.
fibre” and zirconium root canal posts. J Adhes Proceedings of Third International Symposium on 48. Abou-Rass M. Post and core restoration of
Dent 1999; 2: 158–166. Adhesion and Reconstruction. Italy: Hippocrates endodontically treated teeth. Curr Opin Dent 1992;
23. Meyenberg K. Dental esthetics – A European Edizioni Medico-Scientifiche S.r.l., 1999; pp.7–12. 2: 99–107.
perspective. J Esthet Dent 1994; 6: 274–281. 36. Lui JL. Composite resin reinforcement of flared 49. Morgano S, Brackett S. Foundation restorations
24. Wirz J, Christ R. Korrosionserscheinungen an canals using light transmitting posts. Quint Int in fixed prosthodontics: Current knowledge and
Schrauben und Stiften bei Zahnaufbauten – eine 1994; 25: 313–319. future needs. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 643–657.
In-vitro Studie. Schweiz Montsschr Zahnheilkd 37. Lui JL. Depth of composite polymerization 50. Sakkal S. Carbon fiber post removal technique.
1982; 92: 408–428. within simulated root canals using light Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998; 20 (Suppl.):
25. Seiber C, Theil N. Spinell/Luminary porcelain; transmitting posts. Oper Dent 1994; 19: 165–168. S86–S87.
Natural light optics for anterior crowns. Quint 38. Karna J. A fiber composite laminate endodontic 51. Mendoza D, Eakle W, Kahl E, Ho R. Root
Dent Technol 1996; 19: 43–49. post and core. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 230–232. reinforcement with a resin bonded preformed
26. Zalkind M, Hochman N. Esthetic considerations 39. Sirimai S, Riis D, Morgano S. An in vitro study of post. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78: 10–14.
in restoring endodontically treated teeth with the fracture resistance and incidence of vertical 52. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness,
posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 702– root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six elastic limit, and strength of newer types of
705. post and core systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: endodontic posts. J Dent 1999; 27: 275–278.
27. Hepworth MJ, Friedman S. Treatment outcomes 262–269. 53. Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson T. Intermittent
of surgical and non-surgical management of 40. Saupe WA, Gluskin A, Radke R. A comparative loading of teeth restored using quartz fibre,
endodontic failures. J Can Dent Assoc 1997; 63: study of fracture resistance between carbon quartz fibre, and zirconium dioxide
364–371. morphological dowel and cores and a resin ceramic root canal posts. J Adhesive Dent 1999; 2:
28. Arvidson K, Wroblewski R. Migration of metallic reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular 153–158.
ions from screw posts into dentin and restoration of structurally compromised roots. 54. Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, Arvidson
surrounding tissues. Scand J Dent Res 1978; 86: Quint Int 1996; 27: 483–491. K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with
200–205. 41. Kwiatkowski S, Geller WA. Preliminary teeth restored by carbon fibre-reinforced epoxy
29. Angmar-Mansson B, Omnell KA, Rud J. Root consideration of the glass ceramic dowel post resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 151–157.
fracture due to corrosion. 1. Metallurgical and core. Int J Prosthodont 1989; 2: 51–55. 55. Smith CT, Schuman N, Wasson W. Biomechanical
aspects. Odontol Revy 1969; 20: 245–265. 42. Kern M, Knode H. Stiftkernaufbauten aus In- criteria for evaluating prefabricated post-and-core
30. Ichikawa Y, Akagawa Y, Nikai H, Tsuru H. Tissue ceram-Direkte und Indirekte Methode. Quint systems; A guide for the restorative dentist. Quint
compatibility and stability of a new zirconia Zahntech 1991; 17: 917–925. Int 1998; 29: 305–312.