REPORT 2: DESIGN PROPOSAL REPORT
Annexure 2-B Design Proposals
Date 03/02/2024 Team No. 4
Proposed project Urban Flow: Revolutionizing City Commutes through Smart and Connected Mobility
title Solutions
The team (Team leader at top, others in alphabetical order)
Enrolment no. Name Mobile no. Email ID
AU2240166 DHRUV RAKESHBHAI 9773151471 dhruv.p6@[Link]
PATEL.
AU2240218 VARUN KANDARPBHAI 9327411484 varun.p3@[Link]
PUJARA.
AU2240213 NINAD SHAH. 9104410469 ninad.s@[Link]
AU2240172 PARTH KETANKUMAR 6353428345 parth.m3@[Link]
MEVADA.
AU2240193 PRATIK MALVIYA 7383158862 pratik.m@[Link]
1. Integrated Public Transportation
2. Smart Parking Solutions
3. Satellite-Based Traffic Monitoring
4. Dynamic Bus Routes and Scheduling
5. Dynamic Routing Algorithms
6. Electric Vehicle (EV) Infrastructure
7. Electric and Autonomous Delivery Vehicles
Dhruv:
Transportation Environment User Cost Effective
Time al Experience
Decreased Conservation
Excellent 4,1 1,4 4,6 1,6
Good 6,5 6,7 2 7
Fair 3 5 1 2
Poor 2 3 3,7 4,5
Unacceptable 7 2 5 3
Parth:
Transportation Environment User Cost Effective
Time al Experience
Decreased Conservation
Excellent 4,1 1,4 4,6 1,6
Good 6,5 6,7 2 7
Fair 3 5 1 2
Poor 2 3 3,7 4,5
Unacceptable 7 2 5 3
Varun:
Transportation Environment User Cost Effective
Time al Experience
Decreased Conservation
Excellent 4,3 1,4,6 3,6 1,6
Good 1,5 7 2 4
Fair 2 5 1,4 2
Poor 6 2 5,7 7,5
Unacceptable - 3 - 3
Pratik:
Transportation Environment User Cost Effective
Time al Experience
Decreased Conservation
Excellent 4,1 1,4 4,6 1,6
Good 6,5 6,7 2 7
Fair 3 5 1 2
Poor 2 3 3,7 4,5
Unacceptable 7 2 5 3
Ninad:
Transportation Environment User Cost Effective
Time al Experience
Decreased Conservation
Excellent 4,7 6 2,7 1
Good 1,3 1,4 3 4
Fair 5 3 5,6 2
Poor 2 5,7 1 6
Unacceptable 6 2 4 3,5,7
Dominic Method Analysis:
Dominic Method analysis indicates that Ideas 1 (Integrated Public
Transportation) and 6 (Electric Vehicle Infrastructure) perform consistently well
across various criteria, including decreased transportation time, environmental
conservation, user experience, and cost-effectiveness. These ideas show
strength in providing a holistic and efficient approach to connected mobility. On
the other hand, Idea 3 (Satellite-Based Traffic Monitoring) faces challenges in
environmental conservation and cost-effectiveness, while Idea 7 (Electric and
Autonomous Delivery Vehicles) struggles in terms of user experience and cost-
effectiveness. This analysis offers insights for prioritizing and refining these
connected mobility ideas based on specific goals and priorities.
(B)
Top-3 products:
1. Dynamic Bus Routes and Scheduling.
2. Electric Vehicle (EV) Infrastructure
3. Integrated Public Transportation
The above rankings were given with the use of average ranks after the analysis tables
were filled. The general rankings are as follows:
Integrated Smart Satellite- Dynamic Dynamic Electric Electric and
Public Parking Based Bus Routes Routing Vehicle Autonomou
Transportati Solutions Traffic and Algorithms (EV) s Delivery
on Monitoring Scheduling Infrastructur Vehicles
e
3.4 4.4 4.2 1 4.6 2 4.2
As we can see the product with the lowest average rank is the one which has the most
score.
