UNITED STATES SENEATE
TED STEVENS – REPUBLICAN
AUTHORED BY: SHAURYA KAPILA
MODERN SCHOOL BARAKHAMBA ROAD
COMMITTEE: United States Senate
ALLOTMENT: Ted Stevens
SCHOOL: Modern School Barakhamba Road
SENATOR: Shaurya Kapila
Statement of the Problem
We witnessed numerous significant events. In the early 1970s, we observed many events that had
a lasting impact on American history. It all began with a criminal break-in at the DNC
headquarters, leading to a complex web of lies, deceit, and misuse of authority by the executive
branch of the United States, which was already involved in tensions due to the Second Indochina
War. In this tumultuous context, we find Richard Nixon, the 37th U.S. president, becoming
entangled in a series of lies he created by abusing executive power, culminating in the
orchestration of a break-in at the DNC headquarters by five burglars, who were caught with
bugging equipment. These individuals were identified as CIA, FBI agents, and Cuban exiles,
ultimately leading to the Committee to Re-Elect the President (CRP), now infamously known as
CREEP. We discovered an 18½-minute gap that was inaudible. Still, later, the smoking gun tape
revealed a conversation between President Nixon and his Chief of Staff, indicating that the FBI
should not interview the two individuals suspected of funding the break-in. A report from
Washington stated that CREEP received $25,000 linked to the break-in. Soon, more scandals
emerged, such as former Attorney General John Mitchell's secret spy fund aimed at sabotaging
the Democrats, and the source known as Deep Throat came into play. As we established a
Selective Committee, we later found that the convicted burglars pleaded guilty, but a letter was
presented to pressure them into doing so. We see Nixon's close allies and the FBI Director
resigning, implicating a cover-up and exerting pressure. John Dean testified that he talked with
Mr. Nixon regarding the cover-up. Butterfield testified about a bugging device in the White
House, ultimately leading to a series of discoveries and raising questions about whether, after
sufficient inquiry, the Senate can once again stand for the people's rights, uphold the First
Amendment, and whether truth shall prevail.
Personal Policy
I, Ted Stevens was born on November 18, 1923, a lawyer and a senator for Alaska since
December 24, 1968, and before that, a decorated officer having the honor of a bronze medal and
air medal for fighting for its people in World War II. In the current state of affairs, I feel, as a
lawyer who has a strong defense of legislative integrity, that the Watergate scandal vandalizes
public trust in government. The scandal represented a serious breach of ethical conduct and
undermined the democratic process. Since the arrest of buglers, we have come across not a few
but many new incidents pointing towards a famous quote "A lie may take care of the present, but
not for the future ". Discovery of a tape now famously called "The Smoking Gun" in which Mr.
Nixon talks about exempting the suspected finance taker from the break-in. It does indicate a
darker truth behind the reels of tapes before this, known as the 18 ½ minute gap, took over the
news. Why, in a bugler case, is a president so involved? Doesn't this account for a leading
possibility of a connection between the president and buglers how the closet alias of the
president can state that he won't comment on such a small issue but in reality isn't Mr. Nixon
running away from an act in which he has an involvement
My efforts focus on enhancing the Republicans' image among citizens, rather than serving as a
cover for the president. The special committee, which is elected, should function effectively, and
all collected evidence—such as tapes, memos, letters, and testimonies—must be examined
closely. As a Republican, I cannot stand for falsification in any form. For the people of Alaska
whom I represent as a senator, it is my profound responsibility to ensure that truth prevails. By
the fundamental principle that "no one is guilty until proven so," we may find grounds for
accountability against the president, but we must remember that in complex situations,
misunderstandings are common. I express my support through public statements and work to
unravel the intricate issues that still need resolution.
I initially backed Mr. Nixon and did not withdraw my support, but as a senator, I advocate for a
thorough investigation. As a public servant, I will dedicate all my efforts to uncovering the truth,
even if it challenges my loyalty to the party. My commitment to the people must always
prioritize the common good; my policies are my steps toward uncovering the remaining truths.
Evidence List
Tapes:
1. 18 ½ Minute Gap Tape:
Currently inaudible but as we progress with the special committee, we should prioritize the
ratification process.
2. The Smoking Gun Tape:
Contains a conversation between President Nixon and his Chief of Staff. He was discussing
instructions not to allow the FBI to interview two individuals suspected of financing the break-
in.
Newspaper Reports:
1. The Washington Post Investigation:
Reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein uncovered that one of the Watergate burglars
received a $25,000 check from the Committee to Re-Elect the President (CREEP).
2. John Mitchell's Secret Fund:
As per the Washington Post, John Mitchell, the Attorney General, oversaw a covert fund linked
to the illegal activities associated with Watergate.
Letters / Testimonies:
James McCord's Letter:
It was addressed to Judge John Sirica. It claimed defendants were coerced into pleading guilty
and maintaining silence and claimed Mr. Nixon did a full-scale planned cover-up
John Dean's Testimony:
Reports a 105-minute conversation with President Nixon committed to perjury to evade
prosecution.
Implications
The combination of tape recordings, investigative reporting, and testimonies points to a broader
conspiracy involving high-ranking officials in the Nixon administration, aimed at both executing
the break-in and subsequently covering it up. The evidence suggests serious misconduct, raising
questions about accountability and the integrity of the presidential office.
Conclusion
In conclusion, after analyzing the evidence, it is evident that we have only scratched the surface
of this issue—much like the tip of an iceberg. To ensure a comprehensive investigation, a probe
with a heightened focus on the current president must be conducted. This can only be achieved if
the president resigns or is impeached, allowing for an unbiased inquiry free from the risk of
sabotage. It is imperative for the integrity of the investigation that the president steps down to
facilitate a transparent and thorough examination of the matters at hand.
Works Cited
1) New York Times... https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/13/opinion/watergate-republican-
party.html
2) Britannica … https://www.britannica.com/event/Watergate-Scandal
3) Chicago Booth … https://www.chicagobooth.edu/review/wh
