Development Southern Africa

ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cdsa20

Unbundling of the green bond market in the

economic hubs of Africa: Case study of Kenya,
Nigeria and South Africa

Nomhle Ngwenya & Mulala Danny Simatele

To cite this article: Nomhle Ngwenya & Mulala Danny Simatele (2020) Unbundling of the green
bond market in the economic hubs of Africa: Case study of Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa,
Development Southern Africa, 37:6, 888-903, DOI: 10.1080/0376835X.2020.1725446

To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2020.1725446

Published online: 28 Feb 2020.

Submit your article to this journal

Article views: 1119

View related articles

View Crossmark data

Citing articles: 10 View citing articles

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at

https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cdsa20
DEVELOPMENT SOUTHERN AFRICA
2020, VOL. 37, NO. 6, 888–903
https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2020.1725446

Unbundling of the green bond market in the economic hubs

of Africa: Case study of Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa
Nomhle Ngwenya and Mulala Danny Simatele *
Department of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of Witwatersrand,
Johannesburg, South Africa

ABSTRACT KEYWORDS
Climate change is arguably one of the biggest challenges globally. In Green bonds; climate change;
order for countries to meet the commitments of the Paris Agreement, climate finance; Africa;
climate investments need to be scaled up for adaptation and economic hubs
mitigation strategies. Green bonds are one of the most emerging
climate finance mechanisms for large-scale climate projects and
offer investment opportunities for many developing countries. Most
developing countries are heavily reliant on climate funds which are
insufficient. Hence, the urgent need to tap into emerging climate
finances such as green bonds. Out of all the regions, Africa is
expected to be the worst impacted by climate change and green
bonds can contribute to the much needed climate finances. The
growth of the green bond market has been observed in the
economic hubs of the continent with countries such as Kenya,
Nigeria and South Africa demonstrating huge potential in being
active and contributing to the growth of the market. However, this
paper recommends that for the green bond market to further
expand in these countries and rest of the continent, there needs to
be public–private partnerships fostered, integrated policies, political
will as well as effective institutional frameworks.

1. Introduction
Climate change is one of the greatest long-term challenges that mankind is and will con-
tinue to experience (Steffen et al. 2007; McDowell et al. 2019). Human activities such as
the burning of fossil fuels and massive industrialisation have been responsible for the
increased greenhouse gas emissions in the atmosphere (Szulczewski et al. 2012). The
increased release of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere has resulted in climate
change causing irrevocable impacts on the planet (Busby et al. 2014). These impacts
have been widely observed on all sectors of the economy, society and environment
(Skogen et al. 2018). Failure to address these issues, climate change will continue manifest-
ing itself further through adverse impacts on a global level (Andric et al. 2019).
Climate change is undeniably one of the most pressing challenges and over the past decades
various climate conferences have taken place to address this (Figueres & Streck 2009; Tobin

CONTACT Nomhle Ngwenya [email protected] Global Change Institute (GCI), 5th Floor, University
Corner, East Campus, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
*Present address: Global Change Institute (GCI), University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
© 2020 Government Technical Advisory Centre (GTAC)
 DEVELOPMENT SOUTHERN AFRICA 889

et al. 2018). One of the most notable conferences established in the mid 1990s within the fra-
mework of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was
the Kyoto Protocol (Condor et al. 2011). The aim of the Protocol was to ensure legally
binding obligations for developed countries to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions
(Almer & Winkler 2017). The Conference of the Parties (COP) has been at the forefront
of these climate negotiations with the most notable conference being the 21st COP held in
2015 where the Paris Agreement was adopted (Figueres 2016). This agreement was con-
sidered historic as 195 countries unanimously agreed to limit global temperatures well
below 2°C (Figueres 2016). In order to achieve this global goal, climate investments are criti-
cal as countries need to make transformational changes to reduce their greenhouse gas emis-
sions and transition towards a low-carbon society and economy (Hainaut & Cochran 2018).
It has been argued that developing regions are more likely to be the worst impacted by
climate change (Filho et al. 2018). For example, Africa has been identified as one of the
most vulnerable as it is already climatically stressed and climate change is expected to
exacerbate this (Dionne & Horowitz 2016). This view has further been iterated by the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2018 Special Report on Global
Warming of 1.5°C. The report highlighted how an increase in global temperatures
would be disastrous for Africa as this could be twice the increase in temperatures on
the continent (IPCC 2018). Africa’s problems are further worsened by weak institutions
to effectively deal with climate change as weak institutions decrease the capacity and resi-
lience of populations to cope with the impacts of climate change (Bisaro et al. 2018).
Climate challenge in Africa is complex because billions of dollars investments are
required and most African countries are highly dependent on climate finance from devel-
oped countries (Bowman & Minas 2019). The Climate Funds Update 2018 report ident-
ified the Green Climate Fund (GCF) as one of the biggest multilateral climate fund for
several African countries (Fonta et al. 2018). However, there are challenges that some
of these countries have faced in accessing these finances. Fonta et al. (2018) highlight
how the Country Readiness Programme which is considered a priority of the GCF has wit-
nessed only 19 out of 54 African countries having the institutional capacity and proper
systems in place to access funds and resources. To further illustrate this, the World
Resources Institute (2019) highlighted how countries specifically in West Africa such as
Senegal and Sierra Leone experienced challenges in accessing climate funds for adaptation
and mitigation projects. This is due to a lack of a comprehensive budget on how funds
should be distributed and utilised for various climate projects. Other hindrances identified
included the lack of stakeholder engagement between public and private sectors, incoher-
ent policies as well as weak government mandates. All these challenges in accessing climate
finance emphasise the importance of African countries to explore new finance mechan-
isms, such as green bonds, if their commitments to the Paris Agreement is to be achieved
(Gianfrate & Peri 2019). New finance mechanisms can provide opportunities for African
countries to mobilise large amounts of private capital and investments that are readily
available and accessible (Chirambo 2016). This is supported by the African Development
Bank who argue that innovative investment strategies for climate change are rapidly
increasing on the continent and provide the opportunity for African countries to not be
fully dependent on one source of climate finance (AfDB 2018). One of these finance mech-
anisms has been green bonds which are fast becoming a viable financing option on the
continent for investments in large-scale environmental projects (Guha 2019).
890 N. NGWENYA AND M. D. SIMATELE

The green bond market has proven to be an innovative finance mechanism to mobilise
private capital for climate projects (Pham 2016; Glomsrod & Wei 2018). Global green
bond issuances are rapidly increasing in both developed and developing countries due
to investor awareness on the impacts of climate change (Glomsrod & Wei 2018). It is
important to note that the green bond market is much smaller in terms of overall size
in developing countries however; there are initiatives which are being taken by developing
country governments to ensure that the market continues to expand (Banga 2019). The
Climate Bonds Initiative (CBI), which is one of the leading organisations in climate and
green bonds, identified an increase in issuances between the years of 2018 and 2019
from emerging markets such as China, Brazil and India (IFC 2018; CBI 2019a). It was
further highlighted how the growth of green bonds from these emerging markets has
been attributed to the various initiatives by the CBI and these countries to enable and
facilitate the expansion of the green bond market (CBI 2019b).
In Africa, the green bond market has been active in the economic hubs of Africa
(London Stock Exchange 2018). It is because of this that this paper presents an analysis
of the green bond market in Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa as well as the challenges
and opportunities that exist for its growth on the continent. This paper also aims to
address the gap in knowledge of green bonds in Africa.

2. Green bonds: A new source of climate finance

Combating climate change requires more finance and resources than governments alone
cannot provide. Green investments for climate projects have presented several business
opportunities and further allowed investors to adapt their business models to not only
have financial value but environmental values in an effort to protect the planet (Doval
& Negulescu 2014; Taghizadeh-Hesary & Yoshino 2019). One of the most promising
and innovative investment opportunities that have emerged over the years has been
green bonds in comparison to blue and sustainability bonds (Paranque & Revelli 2019).
These bonds have been described as a key solution to help finance many countries tran-
sition towards a low-carbon society and economy (ICMA 2019).
According to Banga (2019) there is a growing consensus on what green bonds are and
what they are intended to do although there is no standard definition that currently exists.
The International Capital Markets Association (ICMA) defines a green bond as funds
‘raised to finance or re-finance green projects, assets or business activities’ (2015: 1).
While the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) defines a green bond as
not being different from a conventional bond except that the proceeds are ‘invested in pro-
jects that generate environmental benefits’ (2019: 1). These different definitions have simi-
larities in what a green bond is even though there is no universal definition. For the
purpose of this paper, the World Bank definition of a green bond will be adopted
which is defined as ‘a debt security that is issued to raise capital specifically to support
climate-related environmental projects’ (World Bank 2015: 23).
The phenomenal growth of the green bond market has been attributed to increasing
climate-awareness from investors about the benefits and impacts of green investments
(Pham 2016). The development of the green bond market is evident in developed
regions with the top issuers being in Europe and the United States (Reboredo 2018).
Although emerging markets from Asia and Latin America have also demonstrated the
 DEVELOPMENT SOUTHERN AFRICA 891

huge potential of this market (CBI 2019b). These include countries such as China, India,
Brazil, Mexico and Malaysia (CBI 2019b). The CBI (2019b) reported an increase in green
bond issuances due to policies and frameworks within emerging markets that are support-
ing green bond market infrastructure (S&P Global 2019).
However, there are factors that continue to act as barriers to further development of the
green bond market in developing regions (Nanayakkara & Colombage 2019). These
include high transaction costs associated with green bond issuance, the lack of incentives
as well as weak government policies and mandates have acted as key barriers to market
growth, especially in regions such as Africa (Moid 2017).
The establishment of the Green Bond Principles (GBP) have been considered an impor-
tant component of green bonds and can be a potential solution to some of the barriers that
the market has had, thus far. The GBP can be described as voluntary guidelines and pro-
cesses for the issuance of green bonds to promote transparency and integrity in the green
bond market (ICMA 2018). There are four key components of the GBP (ICMA 2018).
First, there is the use of green bond proceeds where the GBP recognise broad categories
of the most commonly used projects for green bonds (ICMA 2018). Some of these
common environmental projects for the green bonds are also highlighted under the
CBI taxonomy in which the GBP provides space for these projects to be highlighted
(CBI 2019a) (Figure 1). However, it is important to note that the GBP and the CBI tax-
onomy are the not the same thing.

Figure 1. The different categories and projects under the CBI taxonomy. Source: Climate Bonds
Initiative.
892 N. NGWENYA AND M. D. SIMATELE

Second, there is the process for project evaluation and selection in which an external
review is recommended to assist issuers with project evaluation and green certification
(ICMA 2018). The issuers of green bonds are expected to communicate to stakeholders
and investors regarding how the chosen green projects will have environmental benefits
as well as how potential environmental and social risks will be managed (ICMA 2018).
Third, there is the management of proceeds in which issuers are expected to track the
net proceeds of the green bond for the entire period (ICMA 2018). To further ensure a
high level of transparency, the GBP outline the use of a third party verifier or an
auditor to verify and track the allocation of funds to ensure issues around corruption
and mismanagement of funds are adequately dealt with (ICMA 2018).
The last component is reporting where issuers are encouraged to make information
readily available on the use of proceeds (ICMA 2018). It is also expected from issuers
that information be communicated in a manner that is well understood (ICMA 2018).
Overall, the GBP are there to provide transparency and accountability and it is hoped
that as the market expands and evolves that guidelines and processes become strength-
ened. In addition, in a policy brief by the CBI notes how in areas of financial activities,
such as economic hubs, this provides an opportunity for market participants to develop
local green bond markets where the GBP can further be developed and integrated (CBI
2019b). This allows for the development of a sustainable green bond market where
there is regulation and guidelines on a local and international scale.

3. Economic hubs
This paper provides an analysis of green bonds in the economic hubs of Africa and hence
it is important to define what an economic hub is and the different ways it has been
theorised in literature. The theory of economic hubs is best understood within the
context of economic geography. Malecki (2017) highlights how economic geography
focuses on commercial and economic activities within geographical areas. Economic
hubs are specific places and spaces where there is a concentration of economic activities
which result in a higher capital output (Malecki 2017). This view is further supported
by Poon et al (2015) who highlight how an economic hub is where there is a geographical
concentration of wealth through the location of financial services or multinational com-
panies. This is further illustrated by Hayter & Patchell (2015) who discuss how economic
hubs contribute to the broader global economy due to local production, value chains and
networks that emerge from different sectors located in a specific area.
On the other hand, Warf (2015) is of the view that in economic geography, economic
hubs should be analysed on the dichotomy between society and the economy. The author
argues that an economic hub is not just about the high capital output of certain sectors but
is about social activities that occur in urban economies (Warf 2015). This is further illus-
trated by Penco (2015) who argues that economic hubs contribute to a knowledge
economy where intellectual contributions become a stimulus for innovation. Furthermore,
human capital has also been considered as an important factor in economic hubs. Fertig
et al (2009) argue that an economic hub is a network of human capital where the most
highly skilled individuals contribute to the flows of knowledge and information.
In addition, by drawing on the concept of globalisation this has also been considered as
important in economic hubs. Globalisation has been referred to the interconnectedness of
 DEVELOPMENT SOUTHERN AFRICA 893

the world through global networks of capital flows, trade and technology (Harvey 1995).
Chaminade & Vang (2008) argue that cities have become important as hubs of economic
activities due to globalisation. This is because of the continuous movement of goods and
services, diverse economies and development which globalisation has spurred on econ-
omic hubs across the world (Chaminade & Vang 2008).
Africa’s growth and development has been astounding with emerging markets showing
great potential (Asongu 2017). It is important to note that for this paper, the three
countries being Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa use different criteria for what constitutes
as an economic hub. First, Kenya is considered as an economic hub due to the country
being one of the most economically advanced and industrialised countries in East
Africa (UNCTAD 2018). This is because of the continuous growth the country has had
with the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growing to 5.7% in 2018, superseding all the
other countries in the region (World Bank 2018). It is also one of the leading manufactur-
ing and trade hubs in East Africa (McKinsey 2015). Furthermore, Kenya’s thriving entre-
preneurial workforce has also contributed to the country being a leading economic hub
(Pedo et al. 2018).
Second, Nigeria is considered one of the biggest economic hubs in West Africa due to
the petroleum industry which is the biggest on the continent (Olofin et al. 2014; KPMG
2018). According to the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) in
2018 Nigeria was amongst one of the largest petrol importers in the world (OPEC
2016). The abundance of oil has catapulted the country to be one of the biggest economies
in the West African region (Kemi 2019).
Third, South Africa’s mineral-energy complex has catapulted the country to be a
leading economic hub in Africa. The mining sector has generated huge wealth for the
country with an abundance of valuable resources such as platinum, gold, diamond and
coal. In addition, the country’s agricultural sector is the biggest and most advanced
sector on the continent (Scholvin & Draper 2012). Through the use of agro-processing,
this sector has created profitable opportunities for the local economy and international
investors (Greyling et al. 2015; Senyolo et al. 2018). Recently, over the past ten years,
South Africa has grown towards a knowledge economy hub where a greater focus has
been on ICT technology and e-commerce (Blankley & Booyens 2010).

4. Methodological considerations
This study is qualitative in nature and is based on case study research. Baxter & Jack (2008:
544) describe a case study as ‘an approach to research that facilitates exploration of a
phenomenon within its context using a variety of data sources’. A key advantage of
using case studies is to explore phenomena or situations where little is known about
(Baxter & Jack 2008). Hence, this paper presents case study experiences of green bonds
in Africa drawn from the three different countries of Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa
in which these countries are also considered the economic hubs of the continent.
The paper relied on secondary data which was collected on green bond issuances in
Africa. An extensive web-based search using Google was conducted. Keywords used
during the web-based search included ‘Green bonds Africa’, ‘Green bond issuances
Africa’ as well as ‘Green bond market Africa’. Upon getting results from the search it
was found that the green bond market was active in only three countries being Kenya,
894 N. NGWENYA AND M. D. SIMATELE

Nigeria and South Africa which were also described as the economic hubs of the continent.
To find detailed information on green bonds in these countries, the web-based search
became more refined using words such as ‘Green bonds Kenya’, ‘Green bonds Nigeria’
as well as ‘Green bonds South Africa’.
Published data were available for all the three countries from private companies, gov-
ernment, stock exchanges, media reports as well as reports and publications from different
organisations. From Kenya, published data was available from the Nairobi Securities
Exchange (NSE), FSD Africa, the Climate Bonds Initiative (CBI) and the Kenyan Green
Bonds Programme. Second, from Nigeria published data was available from the Climate
Bonds Initiative, the Nigerian Stock Exchange, the Debt Management Office Nigeria,
Access Bank and Moody’s. Lastly, in South Africa, information was found from the Johan-
nesburg Stock Exchange, GrowthPoint Properties, Nedbank, the International Financial
Corporation (IFC), the City of Cape Town, the City of Johannesburg as well as the Indus-
trial Development Corporation (IDC).
The researchers did not come across any academic literature that was published on the
green bond market specifically on Africa during the data collection period.

5. Green bonds in the economic hubs of Africa

In the context of Africa, recent trends and developments of the green bond market have
been observed in the three economic hubs and it is also where several issuances of green
bonds have occurred (Figure 2).

5.1. Case study: Kenya

The government of Kenya has set ambitious plans for change in order to transition
towards a low-carbon society and this has been reflected in key policies such as the
Green Economy Strategy and Implementation Plan (GESIP) of 2016–2030 (GESIP
2016). A significant aspect within the GESIP is identifying green finance mechanisms
such as green bonds to support the country’s green growth path (GESIP 2016). As a
result of this, the Kenyan Green Bonds Programme (GBPK) was launched in March
2017 with the aim to support the development of a domestic green bond market
(GBPK 2017).
A central component of the GBPK was a multi-stakeholder partnership (GBPK 2017).
This included the Central Bank of Kenya, FSD Africa, the CBI, Nairobi Securities
Exchange, Kenyan Bankers Association, Capital Markets Authority, FMO Dutch Develop-
ment Bank, International Finance Corporation (IFC) as well as the Kenyan National
Treasury (GBPK 2017). The outcome of this partnership resulted in an advisory commit-
tee established from national treasury and parliament to influence new policy incentives
and regulations to attract investors (GBPK 2017). In the private sector, structures were
also implemented by the Kenyan National Treasury and the IFC to create awareness
and knowledge with market participants on green bonds (GBPK 2017).
The first corporate green bond was issued in August 2019 worth 4.26 billion by Acorn
Holdings which is a real estate development firm (Reuters 2019). The proceeds were allo-
cated to build environmentally friendly student accommodation (Reuters 2019). This
green bond issuance demonstrates the effectiveness of multi-stakeholder partnerships in
 DEVELOPMENT SOUTHERN AFRICA 895

Figure 2. Map showing the location of green bonds in the economic hubs of Africa. Source: Authors.

creating platforms to achieve environmental objectives (Reuters 2019). This is further sup-
ported by the Kenyan Capital Markets Regulator who highlighted how the East African
community could leverage from the Kenyan experience on the platforms created to
advance an effective green bond market (Reuters 2019).
However, Magale (2018) is of the view that further work still needs to be done in devel-
oping the Kenyan green bond market. Magale (2018) argues that resources need to be
directed to local Kenyan market participants to develop skills and expertise on green. Fur-
thermore, the author highlights that the Nairobi Securities Exchange is required to estab-
lish robust reporting guidelines to enforce compliance for issuers and hence maintain the
integrity of the market (Magale 2018). This is supported by the CBI (2019b) who argues
that local stock exchanges can play an important role in ensuring that issuers adhere to the
green bond principles.
896 N. NGWENYA AND M. D. SIMATELE

5.2. Case study 2: Nigeria

One of the most significant aspects of Nigeria’s climate change policies has been the need
to diversify funds and access private capital to invest in the country’s low-carbon tran-
sition (Dioha et al. 2019). In 2016 the Federal Government of Nigeria identified green
bonds as a form of sustainable finance where the Nigerian Ministry of Environment
and Ministry of Finance collaborated in setting up the Nigerian Green Bonds Framework
(CBI 2018). Furthermore, events such as the Nigerian green bond week, investment semi-
nars as well as massive media coverage created platforms to increase awareness from other
stakeholders (CBI 2018). These stakeholders included the CBI, the Nigerian local invest-
ment community, Access Bank, FSD Africa as well as FMDQ OTC Securities Exchange
(NSE 2018).
As a result of this the first green bond was issued in 2017 by the Federal government of
Nigeria worth N10.6 billion (Lexology 2017). The issuance of the bond was also highly sup-
ported by the Nigerian investment community as a wide range of investors from commer-
cial banks, asset management firms and pension groups also invested in the green bond. The
proceeds of the bonds were utilised in funding three green projects being the Afforestation
Project, the Energising Education Project as well as the Rural Electrification Project (Lex-
ology 2017). The Federal Government of Nigeria also highlighted how these projects were
specifically chosen as they align with the Sustainable Development Goals (Elum & Momodu
2017). In addition, the CBI rated the country with a positive assessment with regards to how
the different projects were implemented (CBI 2018). This was also supported by Moody’s in
which Nigeria was rated with GB 1 which is regarded as excellent (Moody’s 2017b).
The success of the first green bond issued in Nigeria increased investor confidence from
local and international investors (ESI Africa 2019). In 2019, Access Bank which is one of
the biggest commercial banks in Nigeria issued the country’s second green bond (CBI
2019c). The bank also became the first certified corporate green bond in Africa to issue
a green bond (CBI 2019c). The proceeds of the bond would be allocated for water infra-
structure and solar energy generation facilities (CBI 2019c). Due to the increased investor
interest, various departments and institutions such as the Nigerian Stock Exchange have
issued regulations on the issuance of green bonds (NSE 2018). These regulations have
incorporated the Green Bond Principles and are aimed at promoting integrity within
the local green bond market in Nigeria (Lexology 2017).

5.3. Case study: South Africa

The South African government has stated its commitment to combating climate change by
developing key climate change policies in the past decade. These include the National
Climate Change Response Policy (NCCRP 2011), the National Climate Change Response
White Paper (2011) as well as South Africa’s draft National Climate Change Adaptation
Strategy (2019). In order to enable the transition towards a low-carbon society, the
Department of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries (DEFF) and other key departments
have highlighted the need to scale up financial resources from the private sector (DEFF
2011). One of these finance mechanisms has been green bonds which has gained signifi-
cant interest from local and international investors in the past seven years to fund green
projects in South Africa.
 DEVELOPMENT SOUTHERN AFRICA 897

The first green bond in the country was issued in 2014 by the City of Johannesburg
(COJ) worth R1.5 billion (COJ 2014). The proceeds of the bond were allocated to fund
green projects such as low-carbon transport as well as energy saving measures for residents
like solar water heating (COJ 2014). The success of this green bond resulted in COJ being
acknowledged at the Paris Agreement for tackling climate change as well as receiving the
C40 Cities Award for the green bond (COJ 2014).
In 2017, the City of Cape Town became the second city in the country to issue a green
bond. This was also the first green bond in the country to be listed on the Johannesburg
Stock Exchange (JSE) green segment worth R1 billion (JSE 2017). There was increased
investor appetite over this green bond because of the Invest Cape Town Initiative
which brought together a range of stakeholders such as the CBI, Rand Merchant Bank,
City of Cape Town, the Cape Chamber of Commerce as well as international investors.
The proceeds of the bond were allocated to water management, coastal structures as
well as other projects in line with the city’s climate change strategy (CBI 2017). This
green bond was also successful as it was rated by Moody’s with a GB1 rating which is con-
sidered excellent and the City of Cape Town was also awarded ‘Green Bond of the Year –
local authority’ by the Environmental Finance Green Bond Awards in 2018 (Moody’s
2017a; ESI Africa 2018).
In addition, a few green bonds have also been issued from the South African private
sector. This has largely been attributed to the JSE’s green bond segment which has
allowed investors to contribute in raising capital for sustainable and environmental pro-
jects. GrowthPoint Properties was one of the first South African real estate companies
in 2018 to issue out a green bond on the JSE of R1 billion in which proceeds were allocated
to energy efficiency and green office buildings (GrowthPoint Properties 2018). Further-
more, in 2019, Nedbank became the first corporate bank in the country to issue out a
green bond worth R1.7 billion and proceeds were allocated to renewable energy projects
in the country (JSE 2019).

6. Measures to accelerate the green bond market

It is evident that there is huge potential for the green bond market to increase on the
African continent. However, measures need to be in place to ensure that the market is
rooted in proper frameworks and systems (Figure 3). First, there needs to be legal and
regulatory frameworks in place to ensure that the green bond market operates in a
system where there is transparency and accountability from issuers.
Second, there is a need for continuous monitoring and evaluation of the green bond
market on the continent to determine investor behaviour and impact evaluation. This
would enhance transparency and accountability which is very important for the integrity
of the green bond market and would prevent issues such as greenwashing.
Third, in order for the green bond market to expand there is a need for political will and
proper institutional arrangements. There also needs to be public and private partnerships
fostered as well as policies implemented that guide the green bond market. This has
already been witnessed with the African Development Bank (AfDB) Green Bond pro-
gramme which was established to help facilitate green growth through financing eligible
green projects (AfDB 2013). Similar strategies can be applied for the three countries as
well as other African countries embarking on green bonds in the future.
898 N. NGWENYA AND M. D. SIMATELE

Figure 3. Factors that can influence the growth of the Green Bond market in Africa. Source: Authors.

7. Conclusion: The future path of green bonds in Africa

There are a number of important policy implications which should be considered for the
development of the green bond market in Africa. The introduction of government policies
such as tax incentives on green bonds should be implemented. This can enable green
bonds to become more attractive to investors and enable issuers to get green bonds at a
lower interest rate. For example, the government of China introduced a range of tax incen-
tives, supportive policies as well as regulatory frameworks. This highlights the proactive
approach that China took as a developing country which African countries can draw from.
African governments should also have policies which promote increased awareness and
participation of green bonds. It is important for all market participants to have an under-
standing of the benefits that green bonds can have in achieving climate goals. With
enhanced knowledge and understanding of the green bond market in Africa, this can
also enable innovation within this space to further create a pool of new investors. For
example, India introduced policies which engaged with the wider financial community
on green bonds. This is another example of a developing country making great strides
in the green bond market and this can also be applied by African countries.
There should also be established green bond principles and guidelines that are incor-
porated in the green bond market in Africa. This promotes integrity of the market but
also ensures transparency and accountability for issuers. Every African country should
implement a green bond segment in the local stock exchanges which are set at inter-
national best practice to further promote green listing rules and green issuances. Key
lessons can be drawn from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) in South Africa
which has an established Green Bond Segment that has contributed to promoting the
integrity of the green bond market in the country.
If all these factors are considered, the green bond market has the potential to increase
on the continent. In addition, African countries can benchmark best practices and draw
 DEVELOPMENT SOUTHERN AFRICA 899

key lessons from other developing countries, such as China and India, on green bond
market development experiences. There are valuable lessons which can be learnt and
applied not only for Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa but for other African countries inter-
ested in being involved in the green bond market.

Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Funding
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) [grant number 118921].

ORCID
Nomhle Ngwenya http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5809-5047
Mulala Danny Simatele http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2161-1586

References
African Development Bank (AfDB), 2013. At the center of Africa’s transformation: Strategy for
2013–2022. https://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Policy-Documents/AfDB_
Strategy_for_2013%E2%80%932022_-_At_the_Center_of_Africa%E2%80%99s_Transformation.
pdf Accessed 25 May 2019.
African Development Bank (AfDB), 2018. Green bond programme: Eligible green projects. https://
www.afdb.org/en/topics-and-sectors/initiatives-partnerships/green-bonds-program/ Accessed
25 May 2019.
Almer, C & Winkler, R, 2017. Analysing the effectiveness of international environmental policies:
The case of the Kyoto Protocol. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 82,
125–51.
Andric, I, Koc, M & Al-Ghamdi, SG, 2019. A review of climate change implications for built
environment: Impacts, mitigation measures and associated challenges in developed and develop-
ing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 211, 83–102.
Asongu, SA, 2017. Assessing marginal, threshold, and net effects of financial globalisation on
financial development in South Africa. Journal of Multinational Financial Management 40,
103–14.
Banga, J, 2019. The green bond market: A potential source of climate finance for developing
countries. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment 9(1), 17–32.
Baxter, P & Jack, S, 2008. Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for
novice researchers. The Qualitative Report 13(4), 544–59.
Bisaro, A, Roggero, M & Villamayor-Tomas, S, 2018. Institutional analysis in climate change adap-
tation research: A systematic literature review. Ecological Economics 151, 34–43.
Blankley, WO & Booyens, I, 2010. Building a knowledge economy in South Africa. South African
Journal of Science 106, 1–6.
Bowman, M & Minas, S, 2019. Resilience through interlinkage: The green climate fund and climate
finance governance. Climate Policy 19(3), 342–53.
Busby, JW, Cook, KH, Vizy, EK, Smith, TD & Bekalo, M, 2014. Identifying hot spots of security
vulnerability associated with climate change in Africa. Climatic Change 124, 717–31.
Chaminade, C & Vang, J, 2008. Globalisation of knowledge production and regional innovation
policy: Supporting specialised hubs in the Bangalore software industry. Research Policy 37,
1684–96.
900 N. NGWENYA AND M. D. SIMATELE

Chirambo, D, 2016. Moving past the rhetoric: Policy considerations that can make Sino-African
relations to improve Africa’s climate change resilience and the attainment of the sustainable
development goals. Advances in Climate Change Research 7, 253–63.
City of Johannesburg, 2014. Joburg Pioneers Green Bond. https://www.joburg/org.za/media_/
Newsroom/Pages/2014%20Articles/Joburg-pioneers-green-bond.aspx Accessed 15 June 2019.
CBI (Climate Bonds Initiative), 2017. City of Cape Town Green Bond. https://www.climatebonds.
ney/certification/city-of-cape-town Accessed 26 May 2019.
CBI (Climate Bonds Initiative), 2018. Lagos Launch: Nigeria Green Bond Market Development
Program: New initiative to boost African Green Finance. https://www.climatebonds.net/
050616-lagos-launch-nigeria-green-bond-market-development-program-new-initiative-boost-
african Accessed 12 November 2019.
CBI (Climate Bonds Initiative), 2019a. Green Bonds market summary – H1 2019. https://www.
climatebonds.net/resources/reports/green-bonds-market-summary-h1-2019. Accessed 24 February
2020.
CBI (Climate Bonds Initiative), 2019b. Latin America and Caribbean green finance: Huge potential
across the region. https://www.climatebonds.net/2019/09/latin-america-caribbean-green-
finance-huge-potential-across-region Accessed 28 June 2019.
CBI (Climate Bonds Initiative), 2019c. Nigeria: Access Bank 1st Certified Corporate Green Bond in
Africa: Leadership in Green Finance. https://www.climatebonds.net/2019/04/nigeria-access-
bank-1st-certified-corporate-green-bond-africa-leadership-green-finance Accessed 10
November 2019.
Condor, J, Unatrakarna, D, Asghari, K & Wilson, M, 2011. Current status of CCS initiatives in the
major emerging economies. Energy Procedia 4, 6125–32.
DEFF (Department of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries), 2011. Financing climate change.
https://www.environment.gov.za/sites/default/files/docs/financing_climate_change.pdf Accessed
15 November 2019.
Dioha, MO, Emodi, NV & Dioha, EC, 2019. Pathways for low carbon Nigeria in 2050 by using
NECAL2050. Renewable Energy Focus 29, 63–77.
Dionne, KY & Horowitz, J, 2016. The political effects of agricultural subsidies in Africa: Evidence
from Malawi. World Development 87, 215–26.
Doval, E & Negulescu, O, 2014. A model of green investments approach. Procedia Economics and
Finance 15, 847–52.
Elum, ZA & Momodu, AS, 2017. Climate change mitigation and renewable energy for sustainable
development in Nigeria: A discourse approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 76,
72–80.
ESI Africa, 2018. City of Cape Town scoops green bond of the year. https://www.esi-africa.com/
industry-sectors/business-and-markets/city-of-cape-town-scoops-green-bond-of-the-year/
Accessed 15 November 2019.
ESI Africa, 2019. Nigeria moves to its second green bond issuance. https://www.esi-africa.com/
industry-sectors/finance-and-policy/nigeria-moves-to-its-second-green-bond-issuance/
Accessed 10 June 2019.
Fertig, M, Schmidt, CM & Sinning, MG, 2009. The impact of demographic change on human
capital accumulation. Labour Economics 16, 659–68.
Figueres, C, 2016. The power of policy: Reinforcing the Paris trajectory. Global Policy 7(3), 448–9.
Figueres, C & Streck, C, 2009. The evolution of the CDM in a post-2012 climate agreement. The
Journal of Environment and Development 18(3), 227–47.
Filho, WL, Balogun, AL, Ayal, DY, Bethurem, EM, Murambadoro, M, Mambo, J, Taddese, H,
Tefera, GW, Nagy, GJ, Fudjumdjum, H & Mugabe, P, 2018. Strengthening climate change adap-
tation capacity in Africa – case studies from six major African cities and policy implications.
Environmental Sciences and Policy 86, 29–37.
Fonta, WM, Ayuk ET & van Huysen, T, 2018. Africa and the green climate fund: Current challenges
and future opportunities. Climate Policy 18(9), 1210–25.
GBPK (Green Bonds Programme Kenya), 2017. Green Bonds Kenya. https://www.
greenbondskenya.co.ke/ Accessed 5 June 2019.
 DEVELOPMENT SOUTHERN AFRICA 901

GESIP (Green Economy Strategy and Implementation Plan), 2016. Kenya Green Economy Strategy and
Implementation Plan 2016–2030. http://www.greengrowthknowledge.org/national-documents/
kenya-green-economy-strategy-and-implementation-plan-2016-2030 Accessed 5 June 2019.
Gianfrate, G & Peri, M, 2019. The green advantage: Exploring the convenience of issuing green
bonds. Journal of Cleaner Production 219, 127–35.
Glomsrod, S & Wei, T, 2018. Business as unusual: The implications of fossil divestment and green
bonds for financial flows, economic growth and energy market. Energy for Sustainable
Development 44, 1–10.
Greyling, JC, Vink, N & Mabaya, E, 2015. South Africa’s agricultural sector twenty years after
democracy (1994 to 2013). Professional Agricultural Workers Journal 3(1), 1–14.
GrowthPoint Properties, 2018. Appendix A: GrowthPoint Properties Green Bond Framework.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://growthpoint.co.za/
environmental-sustainability/green-bond Accessed 5 May 2019.
Guha, A, 2019. Green Bonds: Key to Fighting Climate Change? ORF Issue Brief No. 321. 1–13.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336881064_Green_Bonds_Key_to_Fighting_
Climate_Change/link/5db88459a6fdcc2128eb920b/download Accessed 12 November 2019.
Hainaut, H & Cochran, I, 2018. The Landscape of domestic climate investment and finance flows:
Methodological lessons from five years of application in France. International Economics 155,
69–83.
Harvey, D, 1995. Globalisation in question. Journal of Economics, Culture and Society 8(4), 1–17.
Hayter, R & Patchell, J, 2015. Economic geography: An institutional approach. 2nd edn. Oxford
University Press, Oxford, UK.
ICMA (International Capital Markets Association), 2015. Green Bond Principles, 2015. https://
www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Regulatory/Green-Bonds/GBP_2015_27-March Accessed
15 July 2019.
ICMA (International Capital Markets Association), 2018. Green Bond Principles: Voluntary
process guidelines for issuing Green Bonds. https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/
Regulatory/Green-Bonds/June-2018/Green-Bond-Principles---June-2018-140618-WEB.pdf
Accessed 24 February 2020.
ICMA (International Capital Markets Association), 2019. Green, Social and Sustainability bonds.
https://www.icmagroup.org/green-social-and-sustainability-bonds/ Accessed 10 November
2019.
IFC (International Finance Corporation), 2018. Emerging Market Green Bonds Report 2018: A
consolidation year paving the way for growth. https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/
9e8a7c68-5bec-40d1-8bb4-a0212fa4bfab/Amundi-IFC-Research-Paper-2018.pdf?MOD=
AJPERES Accessed 12 November 2019.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2018. Special Report on Global Warming of
1.5°C. https://www.ipcc.ch/2018/10/08/summary-for-policymakers-of-ipcc-special-report-on-
global-warming-of-1-5c-approved-by-governments/ Accessed 5 May 2019.
JSE (Johannesburg Stock Exchange), 2017. JSE launches Green Bond segment fund low-carbon
projects. https://www.jse.co.za/articles/Pages/JSE-launches-Green-Bond-segment-to-fund-low-
carbon-projects.aspx Accessed 24 February 2020.
JSE (Johannesburg Stock Exchange), 2019. Nedbank Green Bond listed on the JSE. https://www.jse.
co.za/articles/Pages/Nedbank-Limited-lists-a-Green-Bond-on-the-Johannesburg-Stock-
Exchange-(JSE).aspx Accessed 25 May 2019.
Kemi, AO, 2019. Nigeria’s economy challenges: Causes and way forward. Journal of Economics and
Finance 10(2), 78–82.
KPMG, 2018. Nigeria’s oil and gas outlook and Nigerian content. https://home.kpmg/ng/en/home/
insights/2018/11/The-KPMG-Guide-Nigeria%E2%80%99s-Oil-and-Gas-Outlook-Nigerian-
Content.html Accessed 27 May 2019.
Lexology, 2017. Green bonds and the emergence of sustainable finance in the Nigerian capital market.
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=c402f0e6-471b-41b8-b161-40feabf01804 Accessed
5 May 2019.
902 N. NGWENYA AND M. D. SIMATELE

London Stock Exchange, 2018. London Stock Exchange Africa Advisory Group: Developing the
green bond market in Africa. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=
https://www.lseg.com/documents/africa-greenfinancing-mwv10-pdf&ved Accessed 26 June
2019.
Magale, E, 2018. Experts’ opinion on challenges facing the development of green bonds on the
Nairobi Securities Exchange. Masters thesis, University of Cape Town.
Malecki, EJ, 2017. Real people, virtual places, and the spaces in between. Socio-Economic Planning
Sciences 58, 3–12.
McDowell, G, Huggel, C, Frey, H, Wang, FM, Cramer, K & Ricciardi, V, 2019. Adaptation action
and research in glaciated mountain systems: Are they enough to meet the challenge of climate
change? Global Environmental Change 54, 19–30.
McKinsey, 2015. East Africa: The next hub for apparel sourcing? https://www.mckinsey.com/
industries/retail/our-insights/east-africa-the-next-hub-for-apparel-sourcing Accessed 10 August
2019.
Moid, S, 2017. Green bonds: Country experiences, challenges and opportunities. Rajagiri
Management Journal 11(2), 1–17.
Moody’s, 2017a. Moody’s Assigns GB1 (Excellent) Green Bond Assessment to the City of Cape
Town Green Notes. https://www.moodys.com/research/Moodys-Assigns-GB1-Excellent-
Green-Bond-Assessment-to-the-City–PR_368194 Accessed 19 November 2019.
Moody’s, 2017b. Moody’s Investors Service Assigns GB1 (Excellent) Green Bond Assessment to the
Government of Nigeria’s Green Notes. https://www.moodys.com/research/Moodys-Investors-
Service-Assigns-GB1-Excellent-Green-Bond-Assessment-to–PR_375611 Accessed 19 November
2019.
Nanayakkara, M & Colombage, S, 2019. Do investors in green bond market pay a premium? Global
evidence. Applied Economics 10, 159–61.
National Climate Change Response White Paper, 2011. https://www.environment.gov.za/sites/
default/files/legislations/national_climatechange_response_whitepaper.pdf Accessed 12 June 2019.
Nigerian Stock Exchange, 2018. Green Bonds. http://www.nse.com.ng/products/debt-instruments/
green-bonds Accessed 19 November 2019.
Olofin, SO, Olubusoye, OE, Mordi, CNO, Salisu, AA, Adeleke, AI, Orekoya, SO, Olowookere, AE &
Adebiyi, MA, 2014. A small macroeconometric model of the Nigerian economy. Economic
Modelling 39, 305–13.
OPEC (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries), 2016. OPEC Annual Statistical
Bulletin. https://www.opec.org/opec_web/static_files_project/media/downloads/publications/
ASB2016.pdf Accessed 10 June 2019.
Paranque, B & Revelli, C, 2019. Ethico-economic analysis of impact finance: The case of green
bonds. Research in International Business and Finance 47, 57–66.
Pedo, MO, Kabare, K & Makori, M, 2018. Effects of public private partnerships frameworks on per-
formance of public private partnership road projects in Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business
and Change Management 5(1), 60–87.
Penco, L, 2015. The development of the successful city in the knowledge economy: Toward the dual
role of consumer hub and knowledge hub. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 6, 818–37.
Pham, L, 2016. Is it risky to go green? A volatility analysis of the green bond market. Journal of
Sustainable Finance and Investment 6(4), 263–91.
Poon, JPH, Tan, GKS & Yin, W, 2015. Wage inequality between financial hubs and periphery.
Applied Geography 61, 47–57.
Reboredo, JC, 2018. Green bond and financial markets: Co-movement, diversification and price
spillover effects. Energy Economics 74, 38–50.
Reuters, 2019. Kenya approves issuance of first green bond. https://www.reuters.com/article/kenya-
bonds-green/kenya-approves-issuance-of-first-green-bond-idUSL8N25B1TQ Accessed 15
November 2019.
Scholvin, S & Draper, P, 2012. The gateway to Africa? Geography and South Africa’s role as an
economic hinge joint between Africa and the world. South African Journal of International
Affairs 19 (3), 381–400.
 DEVELOPMENT SOUTHERN AFRICA 903

Senyolo, MP, Long, TB, Blok, V & Omta, O, 2018. How the characteristics of innovations impact
their adoption: An exploration of climate-smart agricultural innovations in South Africa. Journal
of Cleaner Production 172, 3825–40.
Skogen, K, Helland, H & Kaltenborn, B, 2018. Concern about climate change, biodiversity loss,
habitat degradation and landscape change: Embedded in different packages of environmental
concern? Journal for Nature Conservation 44, 12–20.
South Africa’s Draft National Climate Change Adaptation Strategy, 2019. https://cer.org.za/wp-
content/uploads/2019/05/DEA-Draft-climate-change-adaptation-strategy.pdf Accessed 12 June
2019.
Steffen, W, Crutzen, PJ & McNeill, JR, 2007. The anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming
the great forces of nature AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 36, 614–21.
Szulczewski, M, MacMinn, CW, Herzog, HJ & Juanes, R, 2012. Lifetime of carbon capture and
storage as a climate-change mitigation technology. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 109, 5185–9.
S&P Global, 2019. S&P Ratings forecasts moderate green bond market growth in 2019. https://
www.spsglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/trending/P9Lq4MCmw-
HL6iMRUKgEHG2 Accessed 28 June 2019.
Taghizadeh-Hesary, F & Yoshino, N, 2019. The way to induce private participation in green finance
and investment. Finance Research Letters 31, 98–103.
Tobin, P, Schmidt NM, Tosun, J & Burns, C, 2018. Mapping states’ Paris climate pledges: Analysing
targets and groups at COP21. Global Environmental Change 48, 11–21.
UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development), 2018. Economic
Development in Africa Report 2018. https://unctad.org≥edar2018_ch6_en Accessed 7 June
2019.
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme), 2019. Green Bonds. https://www.sdfinance.
undp.org/content/sdfinance/en/home/solutions/green-bonds/ Accessed 23 May 2019.
Warf, B, 2015. Global cities, cosmopolitanism, and geographies of tolerance. Urban Geography 36
(6), 927–46.
World Bank, 2015. What are Green Bonds? http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/554231525378003380/
publicationpensionfundservicegreenbonds201712-rev.pdf Accessed 25 May 2019.
World Bank, 2018. Kenya Economic Update. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/
766271538749794576/pdf/Kenya-Economic-Update-18-FINAL.pdf Accessed 19 November
2019.
World Resource Institute, 2019. Multilateral Development Bank Climate Finance in 2018: The
Good, the Bad and the Urgent. https://www.wri.org/blog/2019/06/multilateral-development-
bank-climate-finance-2018-good-bad-and-urgent Accessed 7 June 2019.