Sexual Satisfaction Among Nonworking Women A Qualitative
Sexual Satisfaction Among Nonworking Women A Qualitative
Abstract
Background: Sexual function and satisfaction are 2 important components of sexual health. Both sexual function and satis-
faction of women are influenced by various internal and external factors over their life cycle. This study aims to explore the
factors of sexual function and satisfaction among nonworking married women in Bengaluru using a qualitative exploratory study.
Materials and Methods: This is a qualitative exploratory research study that adopted an inductive thematic data analysis.
In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 11 nonworking working married women of Bengaluru. The inter-
views were audio recorded, and the transcribed data were analyzed with ATLAS.ti software. The results were presented
thematically.
Results: It was found that somatic and personal factors such as health and appearance, pregnancy and postpregnancy issues,
compatibility between couples, and spousal qualities; psychological factors such as stressors and stabilizers that related to
emotional and mental health; and situational and extrinsic factors such as pressure to conceive, child-rearing, types of fam-
ily, traditional beliefs and practices, societal stigma and taboo, daily schedules of couples, and ambiance and privacy were
influencing the sexual function and satisfaction of women.
Conclusion: The study could find positive and negative factors of sexual function and satisfaction. These factors need
further exploration with larger studies from other cultures and groups.
Keywords
Sexual function, sexual satisfaction, sexuality, women
Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-
NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-Commercial use, reproduction
and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the Sage and Open Access pages
(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Pious and Amaresha 209
Sexual satisfaction is an effective response arising from but there is a dearth of literature on nonworking married
one’s subjective evaluation of positive and negative dimen- women. Hence, to explore this gap, we have adopted an explor-
sions associated with one’s sexual relationship,10 and it is atory research with the inductive thematic analysis.24
closely related to and depends on the sexual function and
relationship of couples.2 Studies reported several factors of
sexual satisfaction, such as intrapersonal, interpersonal, clin- Study Setting and Participants
ical, sociocultural, and family factors. Intrapersonal factors
include sexual motives, psychological well-being, meno- The study was conducted in Bangalore Urban and Rural dis-
pausal symptoms, poor sexual self-esteem, poor sexual func- tricts among nonworking married women who were above 18
tion, relationship satisfaction, and no previous information years old and living with their spouses. The women who had
about sexuality.11-14 It was also observed that aging, the age any clinical conditions, reached menopause, were divorced or
difference between couples, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, separated, and were married for less than 6 months were
menopause, urinary incontinence, genital tract surgeries, excluded for the study. The study’s information was dissemi-
obesity, infertility, depression, anxiety, miscarriage/recurrent nated through social media and the personal contacts of the
pregnancy loss, and substance abuse are significant factors of first author. Initially, 2 participants were purposively selected
sexual satisfaction among adults.15,16 Interpersonal factors of from Bangalore Rural and Urban districts based on the inclu-
sexual satisfaction of adults were poor partner communica- sion criteria. Subsequently, these 2 participants were asked to
tion,12 good interpersonal communication skills, social skills, introduce or provide contacts of nonworking married women
conflict resolution skills, mutual pleasure, marital satisfac- who potentially met the selection criteria. When a participant
tion, frequency of sex, and relationship adjustment.12,14,15,17 introduced or provided the contact information of another
Sociocultural and family factors of sexual satisfaction are potential study participant, the first author screened them to
beliefs and attitudes about sex, sociocultural taboos, lower rule out any of the exclusion criteria. Women who had been
economic level, number of children, family responsibilities, diagnosed with physical or mental illnesses were excluded
perception of sexual talk as taboo, educational status, and from the study, as were their spouses if they had also been
working status.13,15,18 diagnosed with any physical or mental illnesses. A total of 13
Studies found that there is a high prevalence of sexual participants were eventually screened and 2 were excluded
health-related problems in India, especially among women.19,20 for not meeting the criteria. Initially, 2 participants were pur-
Some researchers have recommended that there is a need for posively selected from both Bangalore Rural and Urban dis-
more studies to explore factors of sexual function and satis- tricts based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Later,
faction among women.5,15,21 A few studies have reported that additional samples from each category were chosen through
the working status has a significant impact on sexual function their contacts. We used 2 criteria to determine data saturation.
and satisfaction.15,22 Hence, this study aims to explore various The first criterion involved the frequency count of codes,
factors of sexual function and satisfaction among nonworking where a code repeated a total of 3 times during the coding
married women. process.25 The second criterion was an a priori stopping point
for data saturation.26 According to this criterion, once all
codes were adequately explored (with a minimum frequency
Materials and Methods count of 3), we conducted an additional 2 interviews to con-
clude the data collection. Data saturation was reached after
Ethics the ninth participant, but we collected 2 more samples as per
the data saturation criteria outlined in the “Data Analysis”
This study is approved by the Institutional Review Board section. Subsequently, further data collection was discontin-
(CU: RCEC00075/7/19). Written informed consents were ued. The sociodemographic characteristics of the participants
sought from all the participants before the study. Participants are given in Table 1.
were given the right to withdraw from the study at any point
during the study. Participants’ identities were anonymized
during the data storage and transcription by giving pseudo-
nyms, and the data were stored in a password-protected drive Procedures
that has access only to the authors. An in-depth interview guide was developed based on the
review of the literature and consultation with experts working
in the field. It included a set of semistructured and open-ended
Study Design questions about the various determinants of sexual function
and satisfaction of women.27 However, it has not been restricted
This is a qualitative exploratory study. It has adopted inductive to only the interview guide, but the emerging issues during the
thematic data analysis.24 Though there are studies21,23 exploring interview were explored through the dialogue between the
the sexual function and satisfaction among clinical population, interviewer and interviewee. The study was conducted during
210 Journal of Psychosexual Health 5(4)
Table 1. Sociodemographic Characteristics of Participants Subsequently, the second author rechecked the codes against
(n = 11). the transcriptions to ensure the retention of the participants’
narratives’ essence. Any deviations from the participants’ nar-
Sociodemographic
Characteristics of Participants Frequency Percentage ratives were identified, discussed, and resolved between the
authors. Therefore, 2 rounds of code revisions were con-
Age categories
ducted before finalizing all the codes and merging redundant
18–30 years 4 36.4
31–45 years 7 63.6 codes with those having similar meanings. Later, these codes
Duration of marital life were grouped according to their meanings and collated with
1–10 years 8 72.7 other codes to derive themes. These themes were reviewed,
11–20 years 3 27.3 defined, and named based on their specific and distinct char-
Place of living acteristics. Finally, the themes and codes were checked
Bangalore Rural district 6 54.5 against transcriptions to see whether the essence is retained.
Bangalore Urban district 5 45.5 Later, the themes were presented with participants’ excerpts.
Education
To report the study and its findings, standards for reporting
Postgraduate or professional 3 27.3
degree
qualitative research guidelines were followed.29
Graduate degree 6 54.5
Higher secondary certificate 2 18.2
Results
the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in June and July 2020. Three global themes were found from data analysis: (a)
Telephonic interviews were conducted with the participants on somatic and personal factors, (b) psychological factors, and
the prior schedule by following the guidelines proposed by (c) situational and extrinsic factors with specific organizing
Whiting with an audio recording.28 The duration of the inter- and basic themes.
views ranged from 30 to 45 minutes.
Child-rearing
Psychological Factors In this, factors such as parenting responsibilities, changes in
routine owing to children, and tiredness and stress associated
Under this global theme, the participants discussed emo-
with the same have either independent or combined effects on
tional/mental health factors including both stressors and
women’s sexual health. With child-rearing factors, women
stabilizers.
need to be more occupied with and for children and need to
provide more attention and time to children than the initial
Emotional/Mental Health
period of their marital life. This leads to having less personal
The emotional/mental health factors are grouped into stress- time and freedom for the women and becoming more tired
ors (favorable factors) and stabilizers (unfavorable factors). and stressed.
212 Journal of Psychosexual Health 5(4)
Previous studies found psychological factors such as used an inductive approach, importance was given to the
stress and anxiety are considered the negative factors of emergence of themes. Also, the codes were cross-checked by
sexual function and satisfaction that are in tune with our 4 participants and verified for consistency. All these contrib-
results.4,5,9 The current study also found other factors, such as uted to qualitative rigor. However, the study has limitations,
anger, mood swings, emotional stability, and happiness, may such as telephonic interviews where it was difficult to collect
impact sexual function and satisfaction. Some of the previous nonverbal data. Also, the study was conducted during the
studies reported that psychological well-being and stable COVID-19 pandemic, which could potentially influence the
mental health influence the sexual satisfaction of women12 participants’ narratives. Another limitation is that, despite
and psychological stress negatively associated with sexual including participants from both rural and urban areas of
function of women.9 Bangalore, we were unable to conduct subgroup analysis.
Sexual satisfaction also influences the family factors Therefore, future studies could explore differences between
such as the number of children and family responsibili- rural and urban populations, as well as between working and
ties.15 The finding of this review article indicates that the nonworking or homemaking women, to gain valuable
sexual satisfaction of women is negatively affected by the insights. The other limitation is the absence of inter-rater reli-
increase in the number of children and various family- ability for code agreement.
related responsibilities and demands.15 However, the
current study finds that some unique factors, such as pres-
Conclusion
sure to conceive, child-rearing practices, and orthodox
family background, negatively impact both sexual func- In conclusion, the study could identify positive and negative
tion and satisfaction. factors related to sexual function and satisfaction among
Sociocultural factors such as traditional beliefs and prac- nonworking married women. The positive factors of sexual
tices and societal stigma and taboos are identified as the function and satisfaction are personal hygiene, physical and
influencing factors. These findings are in tune with other psychological well-being of women, and mutual interest.
studies.13,15 These studies found that such existing traditional The negative factors are menstrual health issues, verbal
cultural and religious practices and stigma and taboo on the abuse by the spouse, lack of sexual health awareness, and
sex topic were acting as a barrier in the sexual life of couples stress and emotional issues. However, these factors need to
in terms of their satisfaction and relationship. Another empir- be explored further with larger studies from other cultures
ical study observed that fewer beliefs related to sexual desire and groups.
as a sin acted as a favorable factor of sexual function among
heterosexual women.35 Author Contributions
However, this study finds a unique result that age differ-
AAP and ACA have significantly contributed to the study’s concep-
ences between couples and age at the time of marriage are
tion and preparation of the study protocol. AAP collected the audio-
unfavorable factors for both sexual function and satisfac- recorded data and transcribed and translated it. Both AAP and ACA
tion. The situational and extrinsic factors such as the daily participated in the qualitative data analysis. AAP conducted the re-
schedule of couples and ambiance and privacy of sexual func- view of literature and prepared the first draft of the manuscript. Both
tion and satisfaction of women are unique since no literature AAP and ACA read the manuscript and revised and approved the
found similar to these findings. final version.
Informed Consent 12. Dundon CM, Rellini AH. More than sexual function: predictors
of sexual satisfaction in a sample of women age 40-70. J Sex Med.
The participant has consented to the submission of the article to the
journal. 2010;7(2 Pt 2):896–904. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01557.x
13. Zegeye B, Woldeamanuel GG, Negash W, Shibre G. Sexual
ORCID iDs satisfaction and its associated factors among married women in
Anu Anns Pious https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1972-8558 Northern Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2020;30(2):169–178.
doi:10.4314/ejhs.v30i2.4
Anekal C. Amaresha https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9851-1698
14. McNulty JK, Wenner CA, Fisher TD. Longitudinal associ-
References ations among relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction,
and frequency of sex in early marriage. Arch Sex Behav.
1. World Health Organization. Defining sexual health: Report
2016;45(1):85–97. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0444-6
of a technical consultation on sexual health, 28–31 January
2002, Geneva. World Health Organization; 2006. Available 15. Shahhosseini Z, Gardeshi ZH, Pourasghar M, Salehi F.
from: https://www.cesas.lu/perch/resources/whodefiningsexual A review of affecting factors on sexual satisfaction in
health.pdf women. Mater Sociomed. 2014;26(6):378-381. doi:10.5455/
2. Ashdown BK, Hackathorn J, Clark EM. In and out of the msm.2014.26.378–381
bedroom: sexual satisfaction in the marital relationship. J 16. Zhang YX, Zhang XQ, Wang QR, et al. Psychological burden,
Integr Soc Sci. 2011;2(1):40–57. sexual satisfaction and erectile function in men whose part-
3. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, et al. The Female Sexual Function ners experience recurrent pregnancy loss in China: a cross-
Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for sectional study. Reprod Health. 2016;13(1):73. doi:10.1186/
the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. s12978-016-0188-y
2000;26(2):191-208. doi:10.1080/009262300278597 17. Pascoal PM, Narciso Ide S, Pereira NM. What is sexual satis-
4. Pakpour AH, Yekaninejad MS, Pallich G, Burri A. Using faction? Thematic analysis of lay people’s definitions. J Sex
ecological momentary assessment to investigate short-term Res. 2014;51(1):22–30. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.815149
variations in sexual functioning in a sample of peri-menopausal 18. Amidu N, Owiredu WK, Woode E, et al. Incidence of sexual
women from Iran. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0117299. dysfunction: a prospective survey in Ghanaian females. Reprod
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117299 Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8:106. doi:10.1186/1477-7827-8-106
5. Avasthi A, Grover S, Sathyanarayana Rao TS. Clinical prac- 19. The George Institute for Global Health India Internet. Framing
tice guidelines for management of sexual dysfunction. Women’s Health Issues in 21st Century India—A Policy Report.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2017;59(Suppl 1):S91-S115. doi:10.4103/ May 2016. Available from: https://www.georgeinstitute.org/
0019-5545.196977 framing-womens-health-issues-in-21st-century-india
6. van den Brink F, Smeets MA, Hessen DJ, Woertman L. Positive 20. Banerjee SK, Andersen K L, Warvadekar J, Aich P, Rawat
body image and sexual functioning in dutch female university A, Upadhyay B. How prepared are young, rural women in
students: the role of adult romantic attachment. Arch Sex Behav. India to address their sexual and reproductive health needs?
2016;45(5):1217–1226. doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0511-7 A cross-sectional assessment of youth in Jharkhand. Reprod
7. Stoeber J, Harvey LN. Multidimensional sexual perfectionism Health. 2015;12:97. doi: 10.1186/s12978-015-0086-8
and female sexual function: a longitudinal investigation. 21. Viswanathan S, Prasad J, Jacob KS, Kuruvilla A. Sexual func-
Arch Sex Behav. 2016;45(8):2003–2014. doi:10.1007/s10508- tion in women in rural Tamil Nadu: disease, dysfunction,
016-0721-7 distress and norms. Natl Med J India. 2014;27(1):4–8. https://
8. Mernone L, Fiacco S, Ehlert U. Psychobiological factors pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25403114/
of sexual functioning in aging women: findings from the 22. Abdallah EH, Younis I, Elhady HM. Does employment
women 40+ healthy aging study. Front Psychol. 2019;10:546. affect female sexuality? Benha Med J. 2020;37(3):626–635.
doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00546 doi:10.21608/bmfj.2020.18498.1119
9. Mishra VV, Nanda S, Vyas B, Aggarwal R, Choudhary S, 23. Velten J, Margraf J. Satisfaction guaranteed? How indi-
Saini SR. Prevalence of female sexual dysfunction among vidual, partner, and relationship factors impact sexual satis-
Indian fertile females. J Midlife Health. 2016;7(4):154–158.
faction within partnerships. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0172855.
doi:10.4103/0976-7800.195692
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0172855
10. Lawrance K-A, Byers ES. Sexual satisfaction in long-term
24. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology.
heterosexual relationships: the interpersonal exchange model
Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706
of sexual satisfaction. Pers Relation. 1995;2(4):267–285.
qp063oa
doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00092.x
25. Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC. Code saturation versus
11. Stephenson KR, Ahrold TK, Meston CM. The associa-
meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough? Qual
tion between sexual motives and sexual satisfaction: gender
Health Res. 2017;27(4):591–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/
differences and categorical comparisons. Arch Sex Behav.
1049732316665344
2011;40(3):607–618. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9674-4
Pious and Amaresha 215
26. Francis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C, et al. What is an adequate 31. Heiman JR, Long JS, Smith SN, Fisher WA, Sand MS,
sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based Rosen RC. Sexual satisfaction and relationship happiness in
interview studies. Psychol Health. 2010;25(10):1229-1245. midlife and older couples in five countries. Arch Sex Behav.
doi:10.1080/08870440903194015 2011;40(4):741-753. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9703-3
27. DiCicco-Bloom B, Crabtree BF. The qualitative research 32. Nowosielski K. Predictors of sexual function and performance
interview. Med Educ. 2006;40(4):314–321. doi:10.1111/j. in young- and middle-old women. Int J Environ Res Public
1365-2929.2006.02418.x Health. 2022;19(7):4207. doi:10.3390/ijerph19074207
33. Mallory AB. Dimensions of couples’ sexual communica-
28. Whiting LS. Semi-structured interviews: guidance for novice
tion, relationship satisfaction, and sexual satisfaction: a meta-
researchers. Nurs Stand. 2008;22(23):35–40. doi:10.7748/
analysis. J Fam Psychol. 2022;36(3):358–371. doi:10.1037/
ns2008.02.22.23.35.c6420
fam0000946
29. O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. 34. Roels R, Janssen E. Sexual and relationship satisfaction in
Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis young, heterosexual couples: the role of sexual frequency
of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245–1251. and sexual communication. Journal Sex Med. 2020;17(9):
doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388 1643–1652. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.06.013
30. Bay R, Ismail S B, Zahiruddin WM, Arifin WN. Effect of 35. Peixoto MM, Nobre PJ. Cognitive-emotional predic-
combined psycho-physiological stretching and breathing tors of sexual functioning in lesbians, gays, and heterosex-
therapy on sexual satisfaction. BMC Urol. 2013;13:16. uals. Arch Sex Behav. 2020;49(5):1823–1838. doi:10.1007/
doi:10.1186/1471-2490-13-16 s10508-020-01732-9