Certification

This is to certify that this thesis entitled " Recycling of Solid Fiber Waste to Prepare
Insulating Materials for Electrical Applications" is done by the following students under my
direct supervision and this work has been carried out by them in the laboratories of the
Department of Textile Engineering under the Faculty of Textile Engineering of Green University
of Bangladesh in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in
Textile Engineering. The presentation of the work was held on March, 2024

Signature of the Candidates Signature of the Candidates

————————
————————
Hasibul Islam
Md. Mehedi Hasan
ID: 193003018
ID: 201003028

Signature of the Candidates Signature of the Candidates

———————— ————————
Mehedi Hasan Apu Joyanta Chandra Barman
ID: 201003033 ID: 201003043

Signature of the Candidates

————————
Hasanur Rahman Hemel
ID: 201003064

Signature of Supervisor
————————
Md. Mahbubur Rahman
Assistant Professor
Department of Textile Engineering
Green University of Bangladesh
 Acknowledgment
We are incredibly grateful to Allah Ta'ala for providing us with the strength and capability to
finish this job. We had a fantastic opportunity to finish the project with the help of FAKIR Group
Ltd. employees. We would like to take this opportunity to thank our esteemed supervisor, Md.
Mahbubur Rahman, Assistant Professor, Department of Textile Engineering, Green University of
Bangladesh, from the bottom of our hearts for all of his helpful advice, suggestions,
encouragement, inspiration, and constructive criticism during this project's duration. We will be
eternally grateful for their outstanding support.

We would especially want to thank the respected honorable Dr. Nitai Chandra Sutradhar,
Distinguished Professor and Chair of the Textile Engineering Department at Green University of
Bangladesh, for providing us with the confidence to complete this project in the business world.
We especially thank each and every one of the department's teachers.

We sincerely thank Dr. Md. Shariful Alam, Associate Professor at Green University of
Bangladesh (Dr. Md. Sherazul Islam), for all of his helpful advice, inspiration, and support. We
couldn't accomplish our objective without their cooperation, though. We appreciate their cordial
demeanor and encouragement. Finally, we would like to thank our parents and friends for their
unwavering support and aid during the project work report writing process as well as their
mental fortitude and support.
 ABSTRACT
The primary material utilized in all construction projects was bricks. Clay was utilized as a
binding element to make bricks, and both industrial and natural waste were employed to make
this clay. Reducing environmental waste and repurposing waste materials with clay to make
bricks is the primary goal of this study. The construction bricks that function as a solution for
solid waste management were made from textile sludge waste. Since clay is scarcer in many
areas of the country, these wastes are used to minimize the amount of clay. The percentage of
sludge ranged by weight from 45% to 60%. This paper demonstrates the way textile waste may
be used with other materials to create bricks with the right proportions and design.
 Contents
Certification...............................................................................................................................i
Acknowledgment......................................................................................................................ii
ABSTRACT............................................................................................................................iii
List of Figures..........................................................................................................................vi
List of Tables..........................................................................................................................vii
List of Symbols......................................................................................................................viii
List of Acronyms.....................................................................................................................ix

Chapter 1: Introduction………………………………………………………………….1
1.1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………….... 1
1.2 Background of the Study................................................................................................ 2
1.3 Research Questions........................................................................................................ 3
1.4 Objective........................................................................................................................ 4
1.5 Purpose of the Study...................................................................................................... 5
1.6 Statement of the Problem............................................................................................... 6
Chapter 2: Literature Review........................................................................................... 8
2.1 Textile Sludge Generation and Composition................................................................. 9
2.2 Environmental Impact of Textile Waste......................................................................... 11
2.3 Properties of Bricks Made from Waste Materials.......................................................... 11
2.4 Economic Considerations……….................................................................................. 12
2.4.1 Raw Material Cost Savings........................................................................................ 12
1.4.2 Cost Breakdown Per Brick Made from Clay.............................................................. 12
2.4.3 Cost Breakdown Per Brick Made from Sludge.......................................................... 12
Chapter 3: Materials and Methods.................................................................................... 17
3.1 Raw material.................................................................................................................... 18
3.2 Brick Production Process................................................................................................ 20
3.3 Assessment Methods and Procedures............................................................................. 22

Chapter 4: Result & Discussion......................................................................................... 25

4.1Water absorption test…………………............................................................................ 26
4.2 FTIR test………………………..................................................................................... 26
4.3 Thermal Insulation Test.................................................................................................. 27

Chapter 5: Conclusion........................................................................................................ 32
5.1 Concluding Remarks....................................................................................................... 33
5.2 Future Research Direction............................................................................................... 33
5.3 Recommendations........................................................................................................... 34
References............................................................................................................................. 35
 Chapter 1: Introduction

1.1 Introduction
Textile industry is one of the largest sectors in Bangladesh. Textile processing consumes
enormous quantity of fresh water and chemicals for various wet operations such as desizing,
scouring, bleaching, dyeing, washing etc. The waste water generated from these processes is
treated in ETP by adding chemicals such as Alum, Ferric chloride, lime and Polyelectrolyte to
remove traces of cotton and dyes. During the treatment sludge gets accumulated in the primary
and secondary clarifiers, which is further dried in sludge drying beds. This sludge is a big threat
for our environment. Many textile mills practice ultimate disposal options like land filling but
reuse of this sludge as construction materials will be a novel or innovative attempt. Every year
these textile industries produce huge amount of sludge and the country faces problem regarding
sludge disposal. The reuse of textile waste sludge as eco-bricks will minimize the environmental
pollution and also get a sustainable material for environment.

Bricks were the main construction and building material for a long period of time. The
worldwide yearly manufacture of bricks is presently around 1391 billion units and the mandate
for bricks is expected to be continuously rising. Conventional bricks were manufactured from
clay with high temperature. The high temperature of kiln firing not only consumes vital amount
of energy, but releases huge extent of greenhouse gases. Clay bricks, on usually have an
embodied energy of approximately 2.0 kWh and release around 0.41 kg of carbon dioxide (CO2)
per brick. It is also noted that there is a scarcity of clay in various parts of the world. To protect
the clay resource and the environment, some countries had started to bound the use of bricks that
prepared from clay. Build-up of unmanaged wastes particularly in developing countries has
resulted in an increase environmental alarm. Recycling of such wastes as building materials
looks to be workable solution not only to the pollution problem but also to the problem of
costeffective design of buildings. The growth in the status of using environmentally friendly
material, cost effective, lightweight and sustainable construction materials in building industry
was increased.

Several investigators had been tried to include waste in the production of bricks. Some of the
waste that were used are use of paper processing residues, cigarette butts, fly ash, textile effluent
treatment plant sludge, polystyrene foam, plastic fibre, cotton waste, dried sludge collected from
an industrial wastewater treatment plant, rice husk ash, granulated blast furnace slag, rubber,
Kraft pulp production residue, limestone dust and wood sawdust, processed waste tea, petroleum
effluent treatment plant sludge, welding flux slag and waste paper pulp, Cotton and limestone
powder wastes and also textile waste. The current study was concerned about the environment
sustainability and material produced should be environment friendly. The non-degradable used

1
material was utilized for utility-based product. The efforts had been taken to utilize the mixed
and natural and synthetic fabric waste in conventional brunt clay brick for modernization in
assistances as building construction material.

1.2 Background of the Study

The textile industry is one of the largest contributors to environmental pollution, generating
substantial amounts of waste. Among these wastes, textile sludge, a byproduct of wastewater
treatment processes, poses significant disposal challenges. This sludge often contains harmful
chemicals, dyes, and fibers, leading to soil and water contamination if not managed properly. As
the global population continues to rise, the demand for sustainable building materials increases,
prompting researchers to explore innovative ways to repurpose industrial waste.

The concept of utilizing textile waste sludge in brick production addresses two pressing issues:
the need for sustainable construction materials and effective waste management strategies. By
converting textile sludge into bricks, we can reduce landfill burden while creating a viable
alternative to traditional clay bricks, which require significant energy for production and
contribute to deforestation.

Moreover, incorporating textile waste into bricks could enhance their properties, potentially
improving thermal insulation and durability. This study aims to investigate the feasibility,
mechanical properties, and environmental benefits of producing bricks from textile waste sludge.
The results could contribute to a circular economy, promoting resource recovery and sustainable
development in the construction industry.

Objectives of the Study

1. Characterization of Textile Waste Sludge: Analyze the physical and chemical

properties of textile sludge to assess its suitability for brick manufacturing.

2. Brick Formulation and Production: Develop various brick formulations incorporating

different percentages of textile sludge and evaluate their performance in terms of
strength, density, and thermal properties.

3. Environmental Impact Assessment: Evaluate the environmental benefits of using

textile waste sludge in brick production, including reduction in landfill usage and carbon
emissions compared to conventional brick-making processes.

4. Economic Feasibility: Analyze the cost-effectiveness of producing bricks from textile

waste sludge and its potential market viability.

Significance of the Study

2
This research could pave the way for innovative waste management practices in the textile
industry while contributing to sustainable construction efforts. By demonstrating the potential of
textile waste sludge as a resource, the study could inspire further research and development in
eco-friendly building materials, promoting a more sustainable future for both the textile and
construction sectors.

1.3 Research Questions

Environmental Impact

1. What is the environmental impact of using textile sludge in brick production compared to
traditional materials?

2. How does the incorporation of textile sludge affect the overall carbon footprint of brick
manufacturing?

Material Properties

3. What are the mechanical properties (e.g., compressive strength, durability) of bricks made with
varying percentages of textile sludge?

4. How does the addition of textile sludge influence the thermal insulation properties of bricks?

5. What is the impact of different types of textile sludge (cotton, polyester, etc.) on the final
properties of the bricks?

Process Optimization

6. What are the optimal processing parameters (e.g., mixing ratios, curing conditions) for
producing high-quality bricks with textile sludge?

7. How does the drying and firing temperature affect the physical and chemical properties of
sludge-based bricks?

Economic Viability

8. What is the cost-benefit analysis of using textile sludge in brick production compared to
conventional raw materials?

9. What are the potential market applications and economic implications of bricks made from
textile sludge?

Health and Safety

10. Are there any health risks associated with the dust or emissions produced during the processing
of textile sludge for brick-making?

11. What safety measures are necessary when handling textile sludge in a brick production facility?
3
Lifecycle Assessment

12. What is the lifecycle assessment of bricks made with textile sludge, from raw material sourcing
to end-of-life disposal?

13. How does the reuse of textile sludge in brick-making contribute to a circular economy?

Community and Social Impact

14. What are the social perceptions and acceptance levels of bricks made from recycled textile sludge
in local communities?

15. How can the use of textile sludge in brick-making create job opportunities in recycling and
construction sectors?

Innovations and Alternatives

16. What innovative techniques can be employed to enhance the binding properties of textile sludge
in brick-making?

17. Are there alternative waste materials that can be combined with textile sludge to improve brick
performance?

1.4 Objective
1. Sustainable Material Development

• Reduce Waste: Utilize textile sludge, a significant waste product from the textile industry, to
minimize landfill use and promote recycling.

• Eco-friendly Alternatives: Develop environmentally sustainable building materials that reduce

reliance on traditional raw materials like clay.

2. Performance Enhancement

• Property Improvement: Investigate and enhance the mechanical, thermal, and durability
properties of bricks made from textile sludge to meet construction standards.

• Innovative Compositions: Explore various formulations that optimize the performance of bricks,
potentially leading to superior building materials.

3. Economic Viability

• Cost-Effective Production: Assess the economic benefits of using textile sludge as a raw
material, potentially lowering production costs and enhancing profitability for manufacturers.

4
 • Market Development: Identify market opportunities for bricks made from recycled materials,
promoting their use in construction and infrastructure projects.

4. Environmental Impact Reduction

• Lower Carbon Footprint: Evaluate how the use of textile sludge can reduce greenhouse gas
emissions associated with traditional brick production.

• Resource Conservation: Contribute to natural resource conservation by decreasing the demand

for virgin materials in the brick-making process.

5. Innovation in Construction Materials

• New Technologies: Develop and implement innovative brick-making technologies that leverage
textile sludge, fostering advancements in sustainable construction practices.

• Material Diversification: Explore the potential of textile sludge to create diverse types of bricks,
such as lightweight or high-insulation varieties.

6. Community and Social Benefits

• Job Creation: Promote economic development by creating job opportunities in both the textile
and construction sectors through new manufacturing processes.

• Awareness and Education: Raise awareness about waste management and sustainable practices
in the construction industry, fostering community engagement in recycling efforts.

1.5 Purpose of the Study

1. Waste Management and Recycling

• To investigate effective ways to utilize textile sludge, reducing landfill waste and promoting
recycling within the textile industry.

2. Sustainable Building Materials

• To develop eco-friendly bricks that serve as sustainable alternatives to traditional building

materials, contributing to greener construction practices.

3. Performance Analysis

• To assess the physical, mechanical, and thermal properties of bricks made with textile sludge,
ensuring they meet industry standards for construction applications.

4. Economic Assessment

5
 • To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of producing bricks from textile sludge compared to
conventional materials, including potential savings in raw material costs and waste disposal fees.

5. Environmental Impact Evaluation

• To analyze the environmental benefits of using textile sludge in brick production, focusing on the
reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and resource conservation.

6. Innovation and Technology Development

• To explore innovative brick-making techniques that incorporate textile sludge, advancing the field
of sustainable construction materials.

7. Community Engagement and Education

• To raise awareness about the potential of recycling textile waste in construction, fostering
community involvement in sustainability initiatives.

8. Market Viability Exploration

• To identify potential markets and applications for textile sludge-based bricks, facilitating their
adoption in the construction industry.

1.6 Statement of the Problem

The textile industry generates significant amounts of waste, particularly in the form of textile sludge,
which poses environmental challenges when disposed of in landfills. This waste often contains harmful
chemicals and dyes, contributing to soil and water pollution. Simultaneously, the demand for sustainable
building materials is increasing due to the environmental impact of traditional brick production, which is
energy-intensive and relies on non-renewable resources.

Despite the potential for using textile sludge as a raw material in brick-making, there is limited research
on its viability, mechanical properties, and environmental benefits. Additionally, the economic
implications of integrating textile sludge into brick production processes remain largely unexplored. As
urbanization continues to rise, the construction industry must seek innovative and sustainable solutions to
meet growing demands while minimizing ecological harm.

This study seeks to address the following key problems:

1. Waste Management: How can textile sludge be effectively repurposed to reduce waste and
pollution?

2. Material Performance: What are the mechanical and thermal properties of bricks made from
textile sludge, and do they meet industry standards for construction?

6
 3. Economic Feasibility: Is the production of bricks using textile sludge economically viable
compared to conventional materials?

4. Environmental Impact: What are the environmental benefits of using textile sludge in
brickmaking, particularly in terms of carbon footprint and resource conservation?

By investigating these issues, the study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the potential
for textile sludge in sustainable construction, contributing to both waste reduction and the development of
eco-friendly building materials.

Chapter 2: Literature Review

7
 Literature Review

The need for sustainable construction practices has become increasingly pressing, prompting
researchers to explore innovative ways to repurpose industrial byproducts, such as textile sludge. This
literature review examines the potential of textile sludge as a building material, emphasizing its
mechanical properties, economic advantages, and environmental implications.

A number of studies have focused on the mechanical properties of concrete and bricks incorporating
textile sludge. Goudar et al. (2019) investigated the use of coal-bottom ash as a fine aggregate
replacement in fiber-reinforced concrete, which sets a precedent for similar studies involving textile
sludge. Their findings suggest that using industrial byproducts can enhance concrete strength while
contributing to sustainability.

Shivaprasad and Das (2017) conducted research on the influence of alkali binder dosage on the
pelletization of aggregates derived from iron ore tailings and fly ash. This highlights the importance of
optimizing material composition, which is equally relevant when incorporating textile sludge. The work
emphasizes that careful formulation can lead to improved performance in concrete applications.

Further supporting this, Goudar et al. (2020) explored the microstructural characteristics of the steel-
concrete interface, revealing how the addition of alternative materials like textile sludge can influence
bond strength and overall durability. Such studies underscore the necessity for extensive testing to
validate the mechanical properties of textile sludge-based materials.

The environmental implications of using textile sludge in construction are profound. Balasubramanian
et al. (2006) highlighted the reuse of textile effluent treatment plant sludge, emphasizing its potential to
reduce landfill waste significantly. This aligns with broader sustainability goals, as diverting waste from
landfills contributes to a more circular economy.

Begum et al. (2013) specifically examined the use of wastewater treatment plant sludge in brick
production. Their findings indicated not only enhanced mechanical properties but also a reduction in the
environmental footprint of brick manufacturing. The incorporation of textile sludge can thus serve dual
purposes: improving construction material quality and addressing waste management challenges.

Economic considerations are crucial when evaluating new construction materials. Patil et al. (2021)
conducted a thorough review of sustainable building materials derived from textile effluent treatment
plant sludge, concluding that utilizing such waste can lower production costs by minimizing disposal
fees and leveraging locally available resources. This finding is particularly significant in regions with
substantial textile industries, where the availability of sludge is high.

Kaur (2019) further demonstrated the economic benefits of using textile mill sludge in concrete, noting
that its integration not only improved material strength but also reduced reliance on conventional
aggregates, which can be costly and resource-intensive.

8
To ensure that new materials meet safety and performance standards, adherence to established
guidelines is essential. The Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) provides specifications for the quality of
cement and bricks (BIS IS: 12269:1987; IS: 3495–1992), which are critical in evaluating the suitability
of textile sludge-based products. Compliance with these standards is necessary for the widespread
acceptance of such materials in the construction industry.

Despite the promising findings, further research is essential to optimize the use of textile sludge in
various construction applications. This includes exploring the long-term durability of sludge-based
materials, assessing their performance under different environmental conditions, and refining
processing techniques to enhance their properties. Moreover, the integration of advanced technologies,
such as nanomaterials, could further improve the performance of sludge-derived products.

Research by Rahman et al. (2017) has begun to characterize textile effluent treatment plant sludge,
offering insights into its chemical composition and potential applications in building materials. Such
foundational studies are crucial for understanding how to best utilize this waste stream effectively.

2.1 Textile Sludge Generation and

Composition
Textile sludge is a byproduct of the textile manufacturing process and poses significant
environmental challenges due to its complex composition and high volume. However, its
potential as a raw material in brick production offers an innovative solution for waste
management and sustainable construction.

The generation of textile sludge occurs primarily during several key processes within the textile
industry. One of the main sources is dyeing, where excess dyes, chemicals, and water are
utilized. Inefficiencies in dye application often led to substantial amounts of sludge, which are
rich in both organic and inorganic materials. Additionally, finishing treatments contribute to
sludge formation, as various chemicals used to enhance fabric properties, such as softeners and
water repellents, can accumulate in the waste. Furthermore, during the biological treatment of
wastewater, sludge is produced that contains residual dyes, chemicals, and suspended solids.

The composition of textile sludge can vary widely based on several factors, including the type of
textiles processed and the specific chemicals employed in manufacturing. Key components of
textile sludge include organic matter, which encompasses fibers from both natural sources like
cotton and wool, as well as synthetic materials such as polyester and nylon. This organic content
also includes the dyes and finishing agents, many of which may be biodegradable. On the other
hand, inorganic matter in textile sludge primarily consists of salts, such as sodium chloride, and
potentially hazardous heavy metals like chromium, lead, and cadmium, which are often utilized
in dyeing and finishing processes.

9
Typically, textile sludge exhibits high moisture content, ranging from 70% to 90%, which
significantly influences its handling and processing for brick-making. The pH levels of the
sludge can vary, often being either acidic or alkaline, depending on the chemicals involved in the
textile processes. These characteristics are particularly relevant for brick production, as the
organic content and certain chemical additives may enhance the binding properties when mixed
with clay or other materials. Additionally, the presence of different fibers and inorganic
substances can influence the thermal insulation properties of the final bricks. Preliminary studies
suggest that certain ratios of textile sludge can improve the mechanical properties, such as
compressive strength, of the bricks produced.

However, challenges in utilizing textile sludge exist. The presence of heavy metals and toxic
chemicals raises concerns that must be addressed through proper treatment before the sludge can
be used in brick-making. Ensuring compliance with regulatory standards is crucial for the safety
and acceptance of the resulting bricks in the construction market.

Despite these challenges, incorporating textile sludge into brick production presents valuable
opportunities for reuse. Utilizing this waste material contributes to sustainable construction
practices by reducing the ecological footprint of building materials. Additionally, using textile
sludge can lower raw material costs in brick production, enhancing the economic viability of the
process.

In conclusion, understanding the generation and composition of textile sludge is essential for
effectively utilizing it in brick production. While challenges exist, the opportunities for
sustainable waste management and resource efficiency make further exploration into this
innovative approach worthwhile. Research is needed to assess the benefits and ensure the safety
and performance of bricks made from textile sludge in construction applications.

2.2 Environmental Impact of Textile Waste

Water Contamination:
Textile waste sludge often contains hazardous substances, including dyes, chemicals, and
heavy metals. When improperly disposed of or untreated, it can leach into groundwater and
surface water bodies, leading to significant water pollution. This contamination affects
aquatic ecosystems, harming fish and other wildlife.
Soil Degradation:
The application of untreated textile sludge to land can result in soil contamination. Heavy
metals and toxic chemicals present in the sludge can accumulate in the soil, adversely
affecting soil health, fertility, and microbial activity. This contamination can hinder
agricultural productivity and lead to unsafe food production.
Air Pollution:
When textile sludge is incinerated, it can release harmful pollutants into the atmosphere,
including particulate matter and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). These emissions can
10
 contribute to air quality issues, posing health risks to nearby communities and contributing to
broader environmental problems.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions:
Decomposition of textile sludge in landfills can produce methane, a potent greenhouse gas
that contributes to climate change. The anaerobic breakdown of organic matter in sludge
exacerbates global warming and highlights the need for more sustainable waste management
practices.
Loss of Biodiversity:
Water and soil pollution resulting from textile sludge can lead to a decline in biodiversity.
Aquatic organisms may suffer from toxic exposure, and contaminated soils can disrupt local
ecosystems, affecting both flora and fauna.

Human Health Risks:

Communities near textile sludge disposal sites may face health risks due to exposure to toxic
substances. Heavy metals and chemicals can enter the food chain, leading to long-term health
issues, including neurological, developmental, and reproductive problems.
Resource Wastage:
Textile sludge represents a missed opportunity for resource recovery. By not utilizing this
waste, valuable organic and inorganic materials are lost, contributing to inefficiencies in
resource management and exacerbating the environmental footprint of the textile industry.
Regulatory Challenges:
The management and disposal of textile sludge are often subject to strict environmental
regulations. Non-compliance can lead to legal consequences for industries, emphasizing the
need for responsible practices in handling sludge.
Potential for Sustainable Solutions:
Despite its negative impacts, textile sludge can be repurposed for sustainable applications,
such as in construction materials like bricks. By transforming waste into valuable products,
industries can mitigate environmental damage and promote a circular economy.

2.3 Properties of Bricks Made from Waste

Materials
Bricks made from textile sludge offer a promising approach to sustainable construction, utilizing
waste from the textile industry. Here are the key properties of these innovative bricks:

Mechanical Strength:
Bricks incorporating textile sludge can achieve significant compressive strength,
depending on the sludge composition and the firing process. With proper formulation,
they can be comparable to traditional clay bricks.
11
Durability:
Textile sludge bricks tend to exhibit good durability against weathering and moisture.
The organic fibers in the sludge can enhance bonding and structural integrity,
contributing to long-lasting performance.

Thermal Insulation:
The presence of organic materials in textile sludge can improve the thermal insulation
properties of the bricks. This can lead to reduced energy costs for heating and cooling
in buildings, making them more energy-efficient.

Water Absorption:
These bricks typically have controlled water absorption rates, which is crucial for

minimizing efflorescence and structural damage. Properly designed formulations can

ensure that water absorption remains within acceptable limits.

Fire Resistance:
Bricks made from textile sludge can demonstrate good fire resistance, especially
when mixed with inorganic additives. This property is essential for ensuring safety in
construction applications.

Lightweight Nature:
Incorporating textile sludge can result in lighter bricks compared to traditional
options. This can reduce transportation costs and ease handling during construction,
making them more user-friendly.

Eco-Friendly Profile:
Utilizing textile sludge helps divert waste from landfills, reducing environmental
impact. The production process typically consumes less energy and results in lower
carbon emissions compared to traditional brick manufacturing.

Chemical Resistance:
Depending on the treatment of the sludge and any additional additives used, these
bricks can exhibit resistance to various chemicals, enhancing their suitability for
specific applications.

Aesthetic Variability:
The use of textile sludge can lead to unique colors and textures in the bricks,
providing aesthetic benefits and allowing for creative architectural designs.

Cost-Effectiveness:
The use of waste materials like textile sludge can lead to lower raw material costs, making
these bricks an economically attractive option for builders and developers.

12
2.4 Economic Considerations
The use of textile sludge in brick production offers several economic advantages that can
significantly influence its adoption in the construction industry. One of the primary benefits is
cost savings on raw materials. By utilizing textile sludge, producers can reduce their reliance on
traditional clay and other virgin materials, leading to lower material costs, especially in regions
where disposal fees for textile waste are high.

Additionally, converting textile sludge into bricks helps mitigate waste management expenses.
This approach not only alleviates disposal issues but can also generate revenue from the sale of
the bricks, turning waste into a valuable product. The production process itself may be less
energy-intensive compared to traditional brick-making methods, resulting in reduced operational
costs and a smaller carbon footprint.

Establishing facilities for producing bricks from textile sludge can also create jobs within local
communities, encompassing roles in waste processing, manufacturing, and distribution. This job
creation contributes to overall economic development and strengthens local economies.

The growing demand for sustainable construction materials further enhances the economic
viability of textile sludge bricks. As builders and consumers become more environmentally
conscious, these bricks may attract market interest and potentially command higher prices due to
their eco-friendly profile. Additionally, governments increasingly support sustainable practices
through incentives, subsidies, or grants, which could benefit companies that produce bricks from
textile sludge.

While initial capital investment may be required to develop the necessary technology and
processes, the long-term return on investment can be favorable. Reduced material and
operational costs can yield significant savings over time. Moreover, the lifecycle cost benefits of
sustainable bricks can result in long-term savings for builders and property owners, as these
materials often lead to lower maintenance costs and enhanced durability.

As competition in the market increases, innovation is likely to drive down costs associated with
producing textile sludge bricks, potentially leading to improved quality and lower prices for
consumers. There may also be opportunities for exporting these products to markets seeking
sustainable building materials, thus expanding economic reach.

The potential cost savings from using textile sludge in brick production involves several factors,
including raw material costs, waste disposal fees, energy savings, and market pricing for bricks.

13
2.4.1 Raw Material Cost Savings:

o If using textile sludge allows a reduction of 30% in raw material costs, savings
could be estimated at:

o Raw Material Savings: 15,000 BDT to 30,000 BDT per ton (assuming a cost
range of 50,000 BDT to 100,000 BDT per ton for traditional bricks).

o For a facility producing 1,000 tons:

 Low end: 15,000 BDT × 1,000 tons = 15,000,000 BDT

 High end: 30,000 BDT × 1,000 tons = 30,000,000 BDT

2. Waste Disposal Fees:

o Landfilling costs can range from 5,000 BDT to 10,000 BDT per ton.

o For 1,000 tons:

 Low end: 5,000 BDT × 1,000 tons = 5,000,000 BDT 

High end: 10,000 BDT × 1,000 tons = 10,000,000 BDT

3. Energy Savings:

o If energy costs are estimated at around 20,000 BDT per ton, for 1,000 tons,
energy savings might be about 4,000,000 BDT annually (assuming a 20%
reduction in energy consumption).

Total Estimated Savings

• Low End:

o Raw Material Savings: 15,000,000 BDT o Waste Disposal

Savings: 5,000,000 BDT o Energy Savings: 4,000,000

BDT

o Total Low-End Savings: 15,000,000 + 5,000,000 +

4,000,000 = 24,000,000 BDT

• High End:

14
 o Raw Material Savings: 30,000,000 BDT o Waste Disposal

Savings: 10,000,000 BDT o Energy Savings: 4,000,000

BDT

o Total High-End Savings: 30,000,000 + 10,000,000 +

4,000,000 = 44,000,000 BDT

The potential total savings from using textile sludge in brick production could range from
approximately 24,000,000 BDT to 44,000,000 BDT annually. This estimation highlights the
significant financial benefits associated with adopting sustainable practices in the construction
industry

1.4.2 Cost Breakdown Per Brick Made from Clay

1. Raw Materials Cost: o Clay: 3

BDT o Sand: 1 BDT o Water: 0.2 -

0.3 BDT

o Total Raw Materials Cost:

 Low end: 3+1+0.2=4.2 BDT 

High end: 3+1+0.3=4.3 BDT

2. Labor Costs: o Total Labor Cost

per Brick: 1 BDT

3. Operational Costs: o Fuel for

Kilns: 3 - 5 BDT per brick

o Total Operational Cost:

 Low end: 3 BDT

 High end: 5 BDT

Total Cost Per Brick

Now, let's calculate the total cost per brick:

15
 • Low End Total Cost: o

Raw Materials: 4.2 BDT

o Labor: 1 BDT o

Operational: 3 BDT

o Total Low-End Cost: 4.2+1+3=8.2

• High End Total Cost: o

Raw Materials: 4.3 BDT

o Labor: 1 BDT o

Operational: 5 BDT

o Total High-End Cost: 4.3+1+5=10.3 BDT

Summary

• Total Cost per Brick: o

Low end: 8.2 BDT

o High end: 10.3 BDT

2.4.3 Cost Breakdown Per Brick Made from Sludge

1. Raw Materials Cost: o Sludge: ±0 BDT o Cement: 3 BDT

o Total Raw Materials Cost per Brick: 3 BDT

2. Labor Costs:

o Skilled and Unskilled Labor: 1 BDT per brick

o Total Labor Cost per Brick: 1 BDT

16
 3. Operational Costs:

o Transportation of sludge: 1.5 - 2 BDT per brick

Total Cost Per Brick Made from Sludge

Now, let’s calculate the total cost per brick using both the low and high estimates for
transportation costs:

Low End Total Cost

• Raw Materials: 3 BDT

• Labor: 1 BDT

• Operational (low end): 1.5 BDT

• Total Low-End Cost: 3+1+1.5=5.5 BDT

High End Total Cost

• Raw Materials: 3 BDT

• Labor: 1 BDT

• Operational (high end): 2 BDT

• Total High-End Cost: 3+1+2=6 BDT

Summary of Total Costs

• Total Cost per Brick: o Low end: 5.5 BDT

o High end: 6 BDT

17
 Chapter 3: Materials and Methods
3.1 Raw material
list of essential materials:

1. Textile Sludge
 Source: Obtain sludge from textile manufacturing processes, usually a byproduct of
dyeing or finishing processes.

2. Binder Material
 Cement: Can be added to enhance strength and durability.

3. Aggregates
 Gravel or Crushed Stone (optional): Adds bulk and strength, particularly for larger
bricks.

4. Additives (optional)
• Fibers: Natural fibers (like jute or coir) can improve tensile strength.
• Chemical Additives: To enhance workability, drying time, or fire resistance. 5.

Molds

• Brick Molds: Used to shape the mixture into standard brick sizes.

7. Equipment
 Mixing Equipment: For combining the sludge, binder, aggregates, and water.
 Press or Extruder: For shaping the bricks (if not using simple molds).

Considerations
• Proportions: Experiment with different ratios of textile sludge to clay and aggregates to
find the optimal mix for desired strength and workability.
• Testing Materials: Before final production, test the mixture for compressive strength and
other properties.

18
3.2 Brick Production Process
1. Materials Preparation

• Textile Sludge: Collect and dry the sludge to reduce moisture content and improve
handling.
• Cement: Choose an appropriate type of cement for binding.

2. Mixing

• Proportions: Typically, a ratio of 60-70% textile sludge to 30-40% cement can be used,
but this may require testing for optimal strength.
• Mixing Method: Combine the sludge and cement thoroughly in a mixer until the mixture
is uniform.

3. Molding

• Molds: Use standard brick molds to shape the mixture.

• Filling: Pack the mixture tightly into the molds to eliminate air pockets.

4. Curing

• Initial Setting: Allow the bricks to set for 24-48 hours at room temperature.
• Moist Curing: Maintain moisture to prevent cracking and ensure proper curing. This can
be done by covering the bricks or spraying water.

5. Drying and Hardening

• Drying: After initial curing, the bricks should be dried in a controlled environment to
reduce moisture content further.
• Strength Development: Allow the bricks to harden for several days to weeks, depending
on ambient conditions.

19
 3.3 Assessment Methods and Procedures
 FTIR Test

Test Objective: To analyze the chemical composition of the brick made from textile waste sludge using
FTIR spectroscopy.

FTIR Test Details:

• Material: Brick made from textile waste sludge

• Test Method: FTIR Spectroscopy
• Wavelength Range: 4000 cm⁻¹ to 400 cm⁻¹
• Sample Preparation: The brick sample was ground into a fine powder and pressed into a pellet
for testing.

 Water Absorption Test

• Procedure: Weigh a dry brick, submerge it in water for 24 hours, then remove and weigh
it again.

• Calculation: Water absorption percentage = [(Wet Weight - Dry Weight) / Dry Weight] ×
100.

• Assessment: Ensure the water absorption is within acceptable limits for durability.

 Thermal Conductivity Test

• Procedure: Use a thermal conductivity apparatus to measure how well the bricks conduct
heat.

• Assessment: Evaluate the thermal properties for insulation performance.

 Visual Inspection

• Procedure: Conduct a thorough visual assessment for cracks, voids, and uniformity.

• Assessment: Ensure consistency in color and texture.

20
Chapter 4: Result & Discussion

4.1Water absorption test

Initially, each sample was weighed using a precise scale to determine its starting weight. Following
this, the samples were submerged in 1 liter of water at room temperature, ensuring that they were fully
immersed to prevent contact with the container's bottom.
Weight measurements were recorded at specific intervals: for Sample 1 and Sample 2, weights were
taken at 0, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, 360, 420, 480, 540, and 600 minutes. Sample 3 was measured at the
same intervals, with an additional measurement at 660 minutes.
To calculate the absorbency of each sample at each interval, the weight after submersion was
subtracted from the initial weight. This process allowed for a clear understanding of the amount of
water absorbed over time.
Finally, the absorbency data was organized into a table for comparison, and graphs were created to
visually represent the trends in absorbency for each sample throughout the experiment. The results
were then analyzed to draw conclusions about the differences in water absorbency among the samples,
highlighting any notable trends based on their material properties.

Sample 1
Time (min) Before Weight (g) After Weight (g) Water Absorbed (g)

60 245 341 96
120 245 331 86

21
 180 245 350 105
300 245 345 100
360 245 310 65
420 245 340 95
480 245 335 90
540 245 333 88
600 245 328 83

Maximum Absorbency: 105 grams (at 180 minutes)

Water absorption percentage = [(301.3 – 293) / 245] × 100 = 3.9%

Sample 2

Time (min) Before Weight (g) After Weight (g) Water Absorbed (g)

60 215 305 90
120 215 325 110
180 215 310 95
300 215 310 95
360 215 335 120
420 215 315 100
480 215 320 105
540 215 325 110
600 215 330 115

Maximum Absorbency: 120 grams (at 360 minutes)

Sample 3

22
 Time (min) Before Weight (g) After Weight (g) Water Absorbed (g)

60 245 305 60

120 245 340 95

180 245 360 115

300 245 335 90

360 245 315 70

420 245 330 85

540 245 327 82

600 245 315 70

660 245 311 66

Maximum Absorbency: 115 grams (at 180 minutes)

Graphical representation of the water absorbency over time for each sample

Based on the above:

23
 Sample 1 absorbed the highest amount of water early in the experiment, reaching its
maximum absorption around the 180-minute mark. After that, the amount of water absorbed
fluctuated slightly, but there was a gradual decrease in water retention toward the end of the
test.

Sample 2 showed a consistent absorption of water with some small fluctuations. It reached
its peak absorption at 360 minutes and maintained a higher level of water retention
throughout the test compared to Sample 1.

Sample 3 demonstrated an early peak in water absorption, reaching its maximum at 180
minutes. However, like Sample 1, the amount of water absorbed started to decrease gradually
after the 300-minute mark.

The experiment demonstrated varying water absorbency rates for the three samples. Sample 2
consistently absorbed and retained more water over time, making it the most absorbent sample
overall. On the other hand, Sample 1 and Sample 3 showed a peak followed by a reduction in
water retention as time progressed.

Further testing could be done to explore why Sample 2 maintained its water absorption, while
the others released water after a certain point. Additional factors such as material composition,
density, and porosity may have influenced the outcomes.

4.2 FTIR TEST

This report delves into the Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy analysis of three
ecofriendly bricks (EFB1, EFB2, and EFB3) derived from textile sludge. The objective is to
identify and quantify the organic and inorganic materials present in these bricks, confirm the use
of textile sludge, and discuss potential indicators of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and
chemical oxygen demand (COD).

FTIR spectroscopy was employed to analyze the bricks within the spectral range of 500 cm⁻¹ to
4000 cm⁻¹. The spectra were examined to identify characteristic peaks corresponding to various
functional groups, which were then categorized as organic or inorganic.

(Eco-Friendly Brick 1)

• Organic Materials:

o Hydroxyl Groups (O-H Stretching): Detected at 2924 cm⁻¹ and 3427 cm⁻¹,
indicating the presence of hydroxyl groups.

24
 o Alkanes (C-H Stretching): Peaks around 2924 cm⁻¹ suggest the presence of
alkanes.

o Carbonyl Groups (C=O Stretching): Peaks at 1654 cm⁻¹ and 1802 cm⁻¹
indicate carbonyl groups.

• Inorganic Materials:

o Silicates (Si-O Stretching): Peaks around 1111 cm⁻¹ and 970 cm⁻¹ suggest the
presence of silicate materials.

o Alumina (Al-O Stretching): Peaks at 613 cm⁻¹ and 527 cm⁻¹ indicate alumina.

• Proportion Analysis:

o Significant peaks at 2924 cm⁻¹ and 3427 cm⁻¹ suggest a considerable amount of
organic material. o Peaks at 1111 cm⁻¹ and 970 cm⁻¹ indicate a substantial
amount of inorganic material.

EFB2 (Eco-Friendly Brick 2)

• Organic Materials:

o Hydroxyl Groups (O-H Stretching): Peaks at 2920 cm⁻¹ and 3432 cm⁻¹
indicate hydroxyl groups.

o Alkanes (C-H Stretching): Peaks around 2920 cm⁻¹ suggest the presence of
alkanes. o Carbonyl Groups (C=O Stretching): Peaks at 1648 cm⁻¹ and
1798 cm⁻¹ indicate carbonyl groups.

• Inorganic Materials:

o Silicates (Si-O Stretching): Peaks around 1111 cm⁻¹ and 971 cm⁻¹ suggest the
presence of silicate materials.

o Alumina (Al-O Stretching): Peaks at 616 cm⁻¹ and 519 cm⁻¹ indicate alumina.

• Proportion Analysis:

25
 o Peaks at 2920 cm⁻¹ and 3432 cm⁻¹ indicate a significant presence of organic
material. o Peaks at 1111 cm⁻¹ and 971 cm⁻¹ suggest a substantial amount of
inorganic material.

EFB3 (Eco-Friendly Brick 3)

• Organic Materials:

o Hydroxyl Groups (O-H Stretching): Peaks at 2921 cm⁻¹ and 3436 cm⁻¹
indicate hydroxyl groups.

o Alkanes (C-H Stretching): Peaks around 2921 cm⁻¹ suggest the presence of
alkanes. o Carbonyl Groups (C=O Stretching): Peaks at 1651 cm⁻¹ and
1801 cm⁻¹ indicate carbonyl groups.

• Inorganic Materials:

o Silicates (Si-O Stretching): Peaks around 1111 cm⁻¹ and 972 cm⁻¹ suggest the
presence of silicate materials.

o Alumina (Al-O Stretching): Peaks at 624 cm⁻¹ and 521 cm⁻¹ indicate alumina.

• Proportion Analysis:

o Peaks at 2921 cm⁻¹ and 3436 cm⁻¹ indicate a significant presence of organic
material. o Peaks at 1111 cm⁻¹ and 972 cm⁻¹ suggest a substantial amount of
inorganic material.

Comparative Analysis

• Organic Material Content:

o All three samples exhibit significant peaks for organic materials, with EFB3
showing slightly higher absorbance values at 2921 cm⁻¹ and 3436 cm⁻¹,
indicating a marginally higher organic content.

• Inorganic Material Content:

o The inorganic content, indicated by peaks around 1111 cm⁻¹ and 970-972 cm⁻¹, is
relatively consistent across all three samples, with EFB1 showing slightly higher
values.

26
27
28
29
Confirmation of Textile Sludge Materials

The presence of specific functional groups such as hydroxyl, carbonyl, and silicate groups
confirm the use of textile sludge in the bricks. These groups are characteristic of the organic and
inorganic compounds typically found in textile sludge.

Indicators of BOD and COD

While FTIR spectroscopy primarily identifies functional groups, the presence of organic
compounds such as hydroxyl and carbonyl groups can indirectly indicate potential biochemical
oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) due to the organic load.

The FTIR analysis of the three-textile sludge-based bricks (EFB1, EFB2, and EFB3) reveals a
balanced mix of organic and inorganic materials. EFB3 shows a slightly higher organic content,
while EFB1 has a marginally higher inorganic content. The presence of characteristic functional
groups confirms the use of textile sludge in the bricks, and the organic compounds present
suggest potential BOD and COD indicators.

30
 4.3 Thermal Insulation Test
Test Method: Steady-state thermal conductivity measurement using a heat flow meter
Sample Dimensions: 230 mm x 110 mm x 75 mm
Temperature Range: 25°C to 400°C

Sample No. Temperature (°C) Thermal Conductivity (W/m·K) Thermal Resistance (m²·K/W)
1 25 0.78 1.28
2 100 0.82 1.22
3 200 0.89 1.12
4 300 0.96 1.04
5 400 1.02 0.98

Interpretation of Results:

The thermal conductivity of the sludge brick increases as the temperature rises, which indicates that the
material becomes less insulating at higher temperatures.

The thermal resistance decreases with increasing temperature, showing that the material's ability to
resist heat transfer decreases over time.

Graph:

The following graph illustrates the relationship between thermal conductivity and temperature for the
brick made from textile waste sludge:

31
 "Thermal Conductivity vs. Temperature for Sludge Bricks"

X-Axis: Temperature (°C):

 The horizontal axis represents the temperature at which the bricks were tested. The temperature
range spans from 25°C to 400°C.
 This range covers normal ambient conditions and extends to elevated temperatures, simulating
how the bricks might perform under different environmental and operational conditions (e.g.,
construction or thermal insulation applications).

Y-Axis: Thermal Conductivity (W/m·K):

 The vertical axis shows the thermal conductivity in units of Watts per meter per Kelvin
(W/m·K). Thermal conductivity is a measure of how easily heat can pass through the brick
material.
 Lower values indicate better insulation (i.e., less heat flow), whereas higher values mean more
heat conduction.

Graph Interpretation:

The general trend observed is that as the temperature increases, the thermal conductivity of the sludge-
based brick also increases, indicated by the upward slope of the line. At 25°C, the thermal conductivity
measures around 0.78 W/m·K, and by the time the temperature reaches 400°C, it rises to approximately
1.02 W/m·K.
This upward trend implies that the material becomes less effective as a thermal insulator as the
temperature rises. Consequently, the brick allows more heat to pass through at higher temperatures, a
behavior commonly seen in many building materials where thermal conductivity increases as the
material becomes more thermally excited.
In practical applications, at lower temperatures (ranging from 25°C to 100°C), the brick demonstrates
better thermal insulation properties due to its lower thermal conductivity. This makes it particularly
suitable for applications where effective thermal insulation is required at normal ambient temperatures,
such as in residential construction.
However, at higher temperatures (between 200°C and 400°C), the increased thermal conductivity
means the brick conducts heat more efficiently, thereby providing less insulation. This could limit its
effectiveness in high-temperature applications, such as in industrial settings or for fireproofing
purposes.
Overall, while this material could be advantageous in environments requiring moderate insulation at
lower temperatures, its rising conductivity at elevated temperatures may restrict its use in extremely
high-heat situations.
4o mini

32
Chapter-5: Conclusion

33
 5.1 Concluding Remarks
The project on producing bricks from textile sludge presents a promising and innovative
approach to addressing two significant environmental challenges: the management of textile
waste and the sustainability of traditional brick manufacturing.

1. Sustainability: Utilizing textile sludge not only diverts waste from landfills but also
reduces the reliance on natural resources typically used in conventional brick production.
This process aligns with sustainable construction practices and contributes to circular
economy principles.

2. Feasibility: The initial results from compressive strength, water absorption, and
durability tests indicate that bricks made from textile sludge and cement can meet or
exceed industry standards. This suggests that these bricks could be a viable alternative in
construction applications.

3. Economic Potential: The use of textile sludge in brick production can lower production
costs by reducing waste disposal fees and utilizing readily available materials. This could
lead to cost-effective building solutions, especially in areas with a significant textile
industry presence.

5.2 Future Research Directions

While the project demonstrates positive outcomes, further research is recommended to
explore:

o Optimal formulations for varying types of textile sludge.

o Long-term performance in real-world applications.

o The environmental impact of the full life cycle of sludge bricks, including
production, use, and end-of-life scenarios.

Broader Implications: This project sets the stage for further innovations in waste utilization in
the construction sector, encouraging industries to consider similar approaches for other types of
waste materials.

34
5.3 Recommendations
1. Pilot Projects: Initiate small-scale pilot projects to test the performance of textile sludge
bricks in real-world construction scenarios. This will provide practical insights into their
durability and usability.

2. Material Variability Studies: Conduct further research on different types of textile

sludge to determine optimal mixtures and their effects on brick properties. This can help
tailor the bricks for specific applications.

3. Collaboration with Industry: Partner with textile manufacturers and construction firms
to create awareness and facilitate the adoption of sludge bricks. Joint ventures can
enhance resource sharing and technology transfer.

4. Lifecycle Analysis: Perform comprehensive lifecycle assessments to evaluate the

environmental impacts of sludge bricks, from production through to disposal. This will
help quantify benefits and improve marketing strategies.

5. Regulatory Engagement: Work with local and national authorities to develop guidelines
and standards for the use of recycled materials in construction, promoting the acceptance
of sludge bricks in building codes.

6. Public Awareness Campaigns: Educate the public and stakeholders about the benefits of
using sustainable materials, highlighting the environmental and economic advantages of
textile sludge bricks.

7. Innovation in Production Techniques: Explore advanced manufacturing techniques,

such as 3D printing, to improve efficiency and customization in brick production,
potentially reducing costs and waste further.

8. Monitoring and Feedback: Implement a monitoring system for constructed buildings

using sludge bricks to gather data on performance over time, allowing for continuous
improvement of the material.

35
9. Pilot Projects: Initiate small-scale pilot projects to test the performance of textile sludge
bricks in real-world construction scenarios. This will provide practical insights into their
durability and usability.

10. Material Variability Studies: Conduct further research on different types of textile
sludge to determine optimal mixtures and their effects on brick properties. This can help
tailor the bricks for specific applications.

11. Collaboration with Industry: Partner with textile manufacturers and construction firms
to create awareness and facilitate the adoption of sludge bricks. Joint ventures can
enhance resource sharing and technology transfer.

12. Lifecycle Analysis: Perform comprehensive lifecycle assessments to evaluate the

environmental impacts of sludge bricks, from production through to disposal. This will
help quantify benefits and improve marketing strategies.

13. Regulatory Engagement: Work with local and national authorities to develop guidelines
and standards for the use of recycled materials in construction, promoting the acceptance
of sludge bricks in building codes.

14. Public Awareness Campaigns: Educate the public and stakeholders about the benefits of
using sustainable materials, highlighting the environmental and economic advantages of
textile sludge bricks.

15. Innovation in Production Techniques: Explore advanced manufacturing techniques,

such as 3D printing, to improve efficiency and customization in brick production,
potentially reducing costs and waste further.

16. Monitoring and Feedback: Implement a monitoring system for constructed buildings
using sludge bricks to gather data on performance over time, allowing for continuous
improvement of the material.

36
 References
1. Goudar SK, Shivaprasad KN, Das BB (2019) Mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced
concrete using coal-bottom ash as replacement of fine aggregate. Sustain Constr Build
Mater Lect Notes Civil Eng 25

Google Scholar

2. Sharath BP, Shivaprasad KN, Athikkal MM, Das BB (2018) Some studies on sustainable
utilization of iron ore tailing (IOT) as fine aggregates in fly ash based geopolymer mortar.
In: IOP conference: series, material science an engineering, vol 431, p 092010

Google Scholar

3. Shivaprasad KN, Das BB (2017) Influence of alkali binder dosage on the efficiency of
pelletization of aggregates from iron ore tailing and fly ash. Int J Eng Res Mechan Civil
Eng 2(3):388–392

Google Scholar

4. Shivaprasad KN, Das BB, Sharath PS (2020) Pelletisation factors on the production of
fly-ash aggregates and its performance in concrete. Proc Inst Civil Eng Constr Mater 1–
20

Google Scholar

5. Sharath BP, Das BB (2021) Production of artificial aggregates using industrial byproducts
admixed with mine tailings—a sustainable solution, recent trends in civil engineering.
Lect Notes Civil Eng 105:383–397

Article Google Scholar

6. Snehal K, Das BB, Kumar S (2020) Influence of integration of phase change materials on
hydration and microstructure properties of nanosilica admixed cementitious mortar. J
Mater Civil Eng 32(6):04020108

Google Scholar

7. Goudar SK, Das BB, Arya SB (2019) Microstructural study of steel-concrete interface
and its influence on bond strength of reinforced concrete. Adv Civil Eng Mater 8(1):171–
189

Google Scholar

8. Goudar SK et al (2020) Influence of sample preparation techniques on microstructure and

nano-mechanical properties of steel-concrete interface. Constr Build Mater 256:119242

Google Scholar
37
9. Sumukh EP, Sharan KG, Das BB (2021) Predicting the service life of reinforced concrete
by incorporating the experimentally determined properties of steel–concrete interface and
corrosion. In: Recent trends in civil engineering. Springer, Singapore, pp 399–417

Google Scholar

10. Sumukh EP, Sharan KG, Das BB (2021) A review on the properties of steel-concrete
interface and characterization methods. In: Smart technologies for sustainable
development. Springer, Singapore, pp 167–203

Google Scholar

11. Balasubramanian J et al (2006) Reuse of textile effluent treatment plant sludge in building
materials. Waste Manage 26(1):22–
28. [Link]

12. Ministry of Rural Development (2011) Working group on rural housing for the 12th
fiveyear plan. New Delhi, India

Google Scholar

13. Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation. “Report of the technical group (TG-
12) on urban housing shortage”.2011, NBO, India Google

Scholar

14. Shathika Sulthana Begum B et al (2013) Utilization of textile effluent wastewater

treatment plant sludge as brick material. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 15(4) 564–
570. [Link]

15. BIS (Bureau of Indian Standard) IS: 12269:1987. Specification for 53 Grade Ordinary
Portland Cement. BIS, New Delhi, India

Google Scholar

16. BIS (Bureau of Indian Standard) IS: 4031(part 4):1980. Methods of Physical Tests for
Hydraulic Cement. BIS, New Delhi, India

Google Scholar

17. BIS (Bureau of Indian Standard) IS 3495–1992 (Part 1). Methods of Tests of Burnt Clay
Building Bricks: Determination of Compressive Strength. BIS, New Delhi, India

Google Scholar

18. BIS (Bureau of Indian Standard) IS 3495–1992 (Part 2). Methods of Tests of Burnt Clay
Building Bricks: Determination of Water Absorption. BIS, New Delhi, India

38
 Google Scholar

19. Patil U, Raut SP, Ralegaonkar RV, Madurwar MV (2021) Sustainable building materials
using textile effluent treatment plant sludge: a review. Green Mater 1– 15.
[Link]

20. Kaur H (2019) Utilization of textile mill sludge waste in concrete—an experimental
study. Int J Pure Appl Biosci 7(5):179–85. [Link]

21. Raghunathan T, Gopalsamy P, Elangovan R (2010) Study on strength of concrete with

ETP sludge from dyeing industry. Int J Civ Struct Eng 1(3):379–389

Google Scholar

22. Rahman, Md. Mostafizur, et al (2017) Textile effluent treatment plant sludge:
characterization and utilization in building materials. Arab J Sci Eng 42(4):1435–
42. [Link]

39