0% found this document useful (0 votes)
209 views3 pages

DNA Test Results for Biniya Child

Uploaded by

Ujjwal Lonkar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
209 views3 pages

DNA Test Results for Biniya Child

Uploaded by

Ujjwal Lonkar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Date : 22 November 2024

DNA RREPORT
By order of Aditya Awasthi we were requested to perform a DNA test. Following
individuals were examined:

SAMPLE NR. ROLE NAME DATE OF


BIRTH
HID123830_001 Alleged Father Aditya 11/11/2000
Awasthi
HID123830_002 Child Biniya 22/02/2018
HID123830_003 Alleged Mother Anu 26/05/2001

Regarding the sampling of the participants please refer to the protocols in copy.

We received the originals of the identity confirmations and of the consent


statements.

Method:

DNA isolation was carried out separately for all samples. Genetic
characteristics were determined by the following PCR-single-locus-technology
analysis.

Promega PowerPlex 21 (WEN ILS 500)

With the Promega PowerPlex 21 (WEN ILS 500) twenty one (21) independent PCR-
systems were analysed: Amelogenin AM, D3S1358, D1S1656, D6S1043, D13S317,
Penta E, D16S539, D18S51, D2S1338, CSF1PO, Penta D, TH01, vWA, D21S11,
D7S820, D5S818, TPOX, D8S1179, D12S391, D19S433, FGA.

In parallel, positive and negative controls were performed which gave the
expected and correct results.
Results:
The results of the analysis are shown in the following table:

DNA- DNA-criteria DNA-criteria DNA-criteria


System Aditiya Anu Biniya
Awasthi HID123830_002 HID123830_002
HID123830_001
AM X, Y X, Y X, Y
D3S1358 14, 14 14, 18 14, 17
D1S1656 16.3, 17.3 16.3, 17.3 16.3, 17.3
D6S1043 11, 17 17, 17 17, 17
D13S317 9, 12 9, 9 9, 9
Penta E 10, 16 10, 16 10, 16
D16S539 12, 12 12, 13 12, 13
D18S51 12, 13 13, 14 13, 14
D2S1338 23, 23 23, 24 23, 24
CSF1PO 10, 11 9, 10 9, 10
Penta D 9, 10 8, 9 8, 9
TH01 6, 6 6, 7 6, 7
vWA 15, 17 15, 18 15, 18
D21S11 29, 30 29, 30 29, 30
D7S820 8, 11 9, 11 9, 11
D5S818 11, 13 11, 12 11, 12
TPOX 9, 11 9, 11 9, 11
D8S1179 13, 14 13, 14 13, 14
D12S391 18, 18 18, 19 18, 19
D19S433 13, 14 14, 15 14, 15
FGA 18, 25 18, 19 18, 19

In all analyzed PCR systems, Mr Aditiya Awasthi does show the genetic
markers which have to be present for the biological father of the child Biniya.
The biostatistical analysis of the PCR systems was performed according to the
method of Essen-Möller. The probability of Mr. Aditiya Awasthi being the
biological father of Child Biniya is > 99.9999 %.

And In all analyzed PCR systems, Miss Anu does show the genetic markers
which have to be present for the biological Mother of the child Biniya. The
biostatistical analysis of the PCR systems was performed according to the
method of Essen-Möller. The probability of Miss Anu being the biological Mother
of Child Biniya is > 99.9999 %.

Conclusion:
Based on DNA Test,
Mr Aditiya Awasthi is the biological father of the child Biniya. The test is
Positive
Miss Anu is the biological mother of the child Bini. The test is Positive

Common questions

Powered by AI

The document establishes the chain of custody by referring to protocols for sampling and receiving originals of identity confirmations and consent statements. This is significant because maintaining strict chain of custody is critical to ensuring the integrity and authenticity of the samples analyzed. It prevents tampering or mix-ups that could invalidate the test results .

The method used to analyze the DNA samples in the report was PCR-single-locus-technology analysis with Promega PowerPlex 21 (WEN ILS 500). This method is significant because it allows for the determination of genetic characteristics across 21 independent PCR systems, thereby providing robust data for identity verification and parental testing. The accuracy and reliability of this method are evidenced by the consistency of positive and negative control results .

The use of controls in DNA analysis is important because they validate the integrity and reliability of the test results. In the document, positive and negative controls were performed and gave expected and correct results, which verifies that the PCR systems functioned correctly and the DNA isolation and amplification processes were free of contamination or error. This ensures trust in the accuracy of the parental test results .

The Promega PowerPlex 21 system plays a crucial role in the DNA analysis by providing the capability to analyze 21 independent PCR systems. This extensive analysis allows for comprehensive genetic profiling, necessary for parental verification tests. The ability to resolve multiple loci simultaneously increases the reliability and conclusiveness of the results, as demonstrated by the match confirmations in this report .

The DNA test report shows adherence to scientific protocols through the use of validated methods such as PCR analysis, and careful handling of samples with explicit documentation of consent and identity confirmations. Ethical considerations are addressed by obtaining consent statements and following standardized protocols for sample collection. These steps ensure that the testing is conducted ethically and scientifically .

The Essen-Möller method contributes to the conclusions of the DNA test report by providing a statistical framework to assess the likelihood of paternity and maternity. It helps calculate the probability of Aditya Awasthi and Anu being the biological parents of Biniya, with results indicating a probability greater than 99.9999%. This statistical backing is crucial for certifying the DNA results as it quantifies the confidence in the genetic test outcomes .

The biostatistical analysis supports the conclusions regarding paternity and maternity by using the method of Essen-Möller to calculate the probabilities. For both Mr. Aditya Awasthi and Miss Anu, the calculated probability of being biological parents to child Biniya is greater than 99.9999%. This high probability threshold ensures confidence in the results, confirming the biological relationships with near certainty .

The DNA marker comparison reveals that in all analyzed PCR systems, the child Biniya shares genetic markers with both Aditya Awasthi and Anu. For example, at loci such as D3S1358 and D16S539, the markers 14, 14 and 12, 12 respectively are shared with Aditya Awasthi, and other loci demonstrate shared markers with Anu, such as D6S1043 where both have 17. This shows the expected genetic inheritance pattern from both alleged parents to the child .

In this DNA report, Amelogenin is used for sex determination, showing X, Y for males and X, X for females. D3S1358 and FGA are part of the analyzed loci critical for establishing genetic individualities and paternity. The child Biniya's markers at these loci match the expected patterns inherited from Aditya Awasthi and Anu, confirming them as her biological parents. These specific markers are routinely used in forensic analysis for their high discrimination power .

The overall reliability of the DNA test results in the document is very high. This is supported by the use of a robust PCR-single-locus-technology analysis across 21 systems, the successful validation through positive and negative controls, and the biostatistical analysis showing a probability exceeding 99.9999% for parental links. These factors combine to provide a scientifically sound and reliable result, validating the paternity and maternity conclusions with confidence .

You might also like