Woods 1935
Woods 1935
To cite this article: H. J. Woods (1935) 19—THE GEOMETRICAL BASIS OF PATTERN DESIGN. Part I: Point and Line Symmetry in
Simple Figures and Borders, Journal of the Textile Institute Transactions, 26:6, T197-T210, DOI: 10.1080/19447023508661654
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the
publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations
or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any
opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the
views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be
independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses,
actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever
caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic
reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any
form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://
[Link]/page/terms-and-conditions
19—The Geometrical Basis of Pattern Design, etc. T197
a right-angle, which are in this way related to the initial position, and we shall
say that there are four equivalent positions of the square. An equilateral
triangle has three equivalent positions, and a regular octagon eight. It is
clear that we may speak of higher or lower symmetry according to the
number of such equilvalent positions of the figure, and in this way we may
arrange figures in an order of increasing symmetry. For the three cases
mentioned this order is :—triangle, square, octagon.
We refer to the order of the central symmetry of a plane figure when
we mean the number of equivalent positions obtainable by rotation about
the centre of symmetry, and we shall say that an equilaterial triangle has
central symmetry of the third order, or that it has three-fold central sym-
metry ; and similarly the square and regular octagon have four-fold and
eight-fold central symmetry respectively. For other figures the extension
is obvious : we say that one has «-fold central symmetry when a rotation
about the centre through an angle of 360°/^ (but no smaller one) gives an
equivalent position, and the centre is then a centre of n-fold symmetry. Any
regular polygon of n sides has a centre of n-fold symmetry.
It is found on analysis that the order of central symmetry of a figure
must be an integer ; n may be a number such as 2, 3, 4, etc., but not 2 J or 3 J.
art from this there is no restriction on the magnitude of n ; figures may
be constructed with central symmetry of an order as high as we may choose ;
the limiting case is the circle, which has central symmetry of an infinite order.
Regular polygons are not the only figures having central symmetry,
for any parallelogram has a centre of two-fold symmetry ; three-fold
symmetry is found in the three-legged Isle of Man symbol, and four-fold in
an ordinary swastika. Such figures are, perhaps, better examples of central
symmetry than the regular polygons, for the latter also possess axial
symmetry.
Axial symmetry • x 1 *
We say that a plane figure has symmetry about a hne m its plane, or
axial symmetry, when it is its own " mirror image " in that line. If the
figure is drawn on thin transparent paper the line will divide it into two
parts such that when the paper is folded along the line the parts superpose.
Line Symmetry in Simple Figures and Borders—Woods T109
so that the one half of the figure may be obtained from the other by rotating
the latter through 180° about the line in question. We refer to a line about
which the figure has symmetry of this kind as an axis of symmetry.
Every regular potygon has at least one axis of s>Tnmetry : the triangle
has three, which are the lines joining the vertices to the centre of symmetry,
whilst the square has four—the diagonals and the lines through the centre
parallel to the sides ; and so on for the others. In general, it is easy to see
that a regular polygon has the same number of s\Tnmetry axes as it has
sides ; if this is even there is an axis through each pair of opposite vertices
and one bisecting each pair of opposite sides; if odd, an axis will pass
through each vertex and bisect the opposite side perpendicularh'. The
number of symmetry axes which a figure may have is thus unrestricted ;
a circle, in fact, has as a symmetry axis any diameter whatsoever.
Just as a figure, such as a swastika, can have central syinmetry without
being axially symmetrical, so the reverse is also true. An isosceles triangle
is the simplest example of an axially symmetrical figure without central
s^Tnmetry ; its axis is clearly the line bisecting the ^^ertical angle. But
generally axial and central s^inmetry are not entirely independent ; for it is
easily seen that when a figure has more than one axis passing through
Downloaded by [New York University] at 11:20 02 August 2015
through 90°, 180° and 270° about the centre, so that the point group contains
just these three operations. In this case it is not necessary to enumerate
all the members of the group, since the last two are implied in the first; we
may therefore take a rotation through 90° about the centre as characterising
the point group associated with a swastika (or any other figure with only
central symmetry of the fourth order). A similar result holds for the other
groups in which the operations are all of the first kind; the group may be
specified by stating the smallest rotation which is an operation in the group.
We see, therefore, that the group of operations associated with a figure
having an «-fold centre of symmetry only is determined completely by the
operation of rotating the figure through an angle of 360°/^ ; we shall refer
to this group as the " point group »," or, where no ambiguity is possible.
Downloaded by [New York University] at 11:20 02 August 2015
32 42 62
Fig. 1
Examples of point symmetry. The symbols under each figure refer to the symmetry type.
as the group n ; and we shall say that the figure for which all the operations
of the point group n but no others are symmetry operations has point
symmetry of the type n, meaning, of course, that the figure has n-fold central
s>Tiimetry only.' When a figure has no point symmetry at all (that is,
neither axial nor central symmetry) we say that it is asymmetrical, or of
the type i. In Fig. i are shown figures of the types i, 2, 3, 4 and 6. These
are the only kinds of central symmetry which we shall find when we come to
consider patterns.
We can also construct point groups of operations which are symmetry
operations for figures ha\dng axial symmetry. When a figure is without
central symmetry, but has an axis, it has only the one symmetry operation
of rotation through 180° about the axis, and this operation specifies a point
group which we symbolise as 12. Here the first term, i, refers to the lack
of central symmetry, and the second, 2, tells us that there is^ an axis of
symmetry. (A distinction must be drawn between this group " one, two
and the group " twelve " corresponding to twelve-fold central symmetry ;
in practice, however, the latter never occurs in those figures with which we
shall have to deal.) ^ ^ ..
When there is both central and axial symmetry, the symmetry operations
may become more complicated. For example, where there are two
Line Symmetry in Simple Figures and Borders—Woods T20I
12 (d) 112
COUNTERCHANGE SYMMETRY
The symmetry operations which we have so far discussed have been
purely geometrical, that is, movements of various kinds which were such
that each movement of the figure resulted in an equivalent position exactly
superposible on the initial one. By this we mean that if the figure is drawn
in back and white, black falls on black and white on white. It may happen,
however, that a figure is such that it can be moved to a new position in
which black and white are exactly interchanged. For example, if we
consider a square divided into black and white halves by a diagonal, it has,
in the strict sense, no centre and only one axis of symmetry (the other
diagonal). On the other hand, there is a sort of pseudo-central symmetry
(two-fold) ; for a rotation through 180° about the centre of the square
interchanges the positions of the black and white exactly ; and clearly there
is a similar kind of axial symmetry about the line dividing black from white.
We shall caU symmetry of this sort " counterchange symmetry," and we shaU
proceed to discuss it in a manner similar to that in which we considered
pure symmetry, i.e. by introducing a new symmetry operation. This we
Line Symmetry in Simple Figures and Borders—Woods T205
shall call reversal (in the photographic sense), and the operation of reversal
alone, without any movement of the figure, we define as an interchange of
black and white. Obviously the simple operation cannot be a symmetry
operation of any figure, but reversal combined with a geometrical movement
can. We accordingly get a series of new hybrid operations, and we can
build up groups containing these either alone or in company with other
pure sjonmetry operations.
These new operations and the corresponding symmetry elements may
now be described. We have first, corresponding to a centre of symmetry
of even order, a centre of reversion of the same order. In borders we can
have only two-fold reversion centres, and the symmetry operation
corresponding to one of these is a rotation through 180° followed by a reversal.
The extension to higher orders is obvious—for the wth order there is a rotation
through an angle of 3607^ followed by a reversal. The odd-ordered
symmetry centres have no analogues, for an odd-ordered reversion centre
would mean that the figure was both black and white in the same place.
In plane pattems reversion centres of orders 2, 4, and 6 occur ; we shall use
the symbols 2', 4', and 6' to refer to them. Thus 2' alone means the existence
of a two-fold reversion centre, whilst, as in the case of pure symmetry,
Downloaded by [New York University] at 11:20 02 August 2015
•O
6* (x) 62
Fig. 3
Types of counterchange point-symmetry in occurring patterns.
T2O6 19—The Geometrical Basis of Pattern Design. Part I—Point and
Type:- 1 2. Type:- 2
7. Type:- 222
Patterns Nos. 1-7.
a reversal ; and as in the case of a screw, the translational part of the
operation must be half the unit translation of the border. We shall call the
operation a reversion-translation, and we represent it symbolically by a.
The symbols for axial symmetry follow this, when such symmetry exists
{a2 represents a longitudinal S3'mmetry axis and a reversion-translation).
When there is both central and reversion-translational symmetry, the
term 2/« replaces that for the central sjonmetry, but when it is found that
the existence of the central symmetry is implied in the axial symmetry
specified by the second and third terms, a is written alone instead of 2Ja.
COUNTERCHANGE POINT-SYMMETRY
Types of point symmetry in which reversal is part of at least one of the
sjTTimetry operations are shown in Fig. 3, which illustrates the possible
counterchange point-symmetries occurring in patterns. In the rectangle
shown in (i) there is only a reversion axis, so that the type is 12'; and
(ii) has only a centre of reversion, and is thus of the type 2'. All the other
figures have both geometrical and reversion symmetry elements; (vi), for
instance, is of the " fundamental" point-symmetry type 2, but of the
counterchange type 4'. The only ones of these types which occur in borders
are the first four, so that we need not here consider the others in detail.
In (iii) the co-existence of a centre of reversion and a symmetry axis implies
also the occurrence of the reversion axis perpendicular to the latter, so
that we call the type 2'2. Similarly the centre of symmetry in (iv), together
with one of the reversion axes, is sufiicient to specify the type:—22'.
The small arrows placed round the figures show how we may represent
Line Symmetry in Simple Figures and Borders—Woods T207
Type:- a Type:- 2»
From a basic border of the type 12 whose translation isfl/2we can derive
two other types, a2 and «2i. The former has a reversion-translation and
a longitudinal symmetry axis and is obtained by drawing alternate cells of
the basic border in black-on-white and white-on-back. Pattem No. 12 is
of this type. a2i is the result of changing the symmetry axis into a reversion
axis, and here, too, there is a reversion-translation (Pattern No. 13). It will
be noticed that in a2 the symmetry axis coincides with a screw-reversion
axis, whilst in a2i the reversion axis is also a screw axis ; it is this screw axis
which we indicate in the type-S5mibol, in accordance with the general
principle that pure symmetry elements should be shown, rather than reversion
ones, when there is a choice.
Derived from I2i. From this type we get only one counterchange
derivative by making the screw axis a screw-reversion one. This new
type is 12/, and Pattem No. 14 is an example.
Derived from 112. From type 112 there are two counterchange types
to be obtained. If the basic border has a translation a, a derivative with
the same translation is found by making all the transverse axes reversion
axes. This gives the type 112', illustrated by Pattem No. 15. For
Downloaded by [New York University] at 11:20 02 August 2015
Pattern No. 16 the basic border has a translation a/2, and alternate cells
are drawn in black-on-white and white-on-black. There is thus a reversion-
translation in the new border, and alternate axes of the basic one are changed
to reversion axes, the rest remaining pure symmetry axes. The type is
therefore ai2. Since there is a choice, in this case, of which set of alternate
axes shall become reversion elements, we can obtain two distinct borders of
this type from any basic one, without increasing the length of the unit cell
still further.
Derived from 222. This is the most prolific fundamental type, since it
leads to no fewer than five counterchange types. Keeping the centres of
symmetry and changing all the axes (longitudinal and transverse) into
reversion axes gives the type 22'2' (Pattern No. 17). If the longitudinal
symmetry axis is kept, whilst the centres are made reversion centres and the
transverse axes reversion axes, we arrive at the type 2'22' (Pattem No. 18).
A third possibility is to keep the transverse axes pure, but change all the
centres and the longitudinal axis into reversion elements, which gives
type 2'2'2 (Pattern No. 19).
The other two derivatives come from a basic border whose translation
is fl/2. There is a22 (Pattern No. 20), in which alternate centres of the
basic border are changed to reversion centres, and at the same time the
transverse axes through these are made reversion axes. The new border
has a reversion-translation, and the longitudinal symmetry axis is also
a screw-reversion axis. Different patterns arise according to the choice
made of the set of centres which become reversion centres.
Finally there is the type fl2i2 (Pattern No. 21), in which the longitudinal
axis becomes a reversion axis, alternate centres become reversion centres,
and the transverse axes through the remaining symmetry centres become
reversion axes. Again we have a reversion-translation in the new border,
and the longitudinal reversion axis is also a screw axis. Here, too, there are
distinct pattems according to which centres are made reversion centres.
Derived from type 22^2. In this last case there are three derivatives.
Pattem No. 22 is an example of the type 2'2i2', in which only the screw axis
of the basic border remains a pure symmetry element, all the transverse
axes and all the centres being changed to reversion elements. Type 2'2/2,
T2IO 19—The Geometrical Basis of Pattern Design, etc.
to which Pattern No. 23 belongs, has transverse symmetry axes as in the
basic border, but all the other elements are changed into reversion ones.
The other type, 22/2', has the same central symmetry as the basic border,
but all its axes are reversion elements (Pattern iTo. 24).
Analysis shows that we have now exhausted the possibilities, and no
counterchange border exists which does not fall into one of the seventeen
categories described above. In Table II these are enumerated ; it may
be noted that the " basic symmetry " does not mean the fundamental
symmetry-type of the border, but the symmetry of the basic border in the
sense used above. These are not the same, for it is easy to see that, for
example, a border of the type 2'2'2 (No. 19) belongs to the pure symmetry
type 112, whereas its " basic symmetry " is 222. It may also be noted that
where an a appears in the type-symbol, the basic border has a translation «/2 ;
in all other cases the basic border has the same translation, a, as the counter-
change border.
Table II
The Seventeen Types of Symmetry in Counterchange Borders.
Translation :—a
Basic
Downloaded by [New York University] at 11:20 02 August 2015