Ottao Imrad
Ottao Imrad
REGARDING
RA 11131
A Research Presented to
The Faculty of the College of Criminal Justice Education BAGUIO
CENTRAL UNIVERSITY
Baguio City
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Degree BACHELOR OF
SCIENCE IN CRIMINOLOGY
May 2024
ABSTRACT
The study focused on the awareness among graduating students regarding Republic Act
11131. Through a mixed method, specifically utilizing a questionnaire and interview guides,
the researchers were able to come up with finding on three objectives. First, the level of
awareness among graduating students regarding RA 11131; second, the level of difficulty
among factors affecting the preparation for the board licensure examination as perceived by
the graduating students. The third is the impact of the provisions of RA 11131 on the
preparation for the board licensure examination as perceived by the graduating students. The
graduating students are very much aware of the provisions of the law, specifically that “an
applicant must possess good moral character,” “20% of the general weighted average will
come from the Law Enforcement Administration,” and “candidate must obtain a weighted
average of 75% with no grade less than 60% in any given subject”. The graduating students
find it difficult to “remember,” the “resources and study materials provided by the institution
have adequately prepared them for the board examination,” and the “overwhelming feelings
of the workload make it harder to focus on studying for the exam”. As the impact of the
provisions of RA 11131, three positive impacts were “motivation to study better,” “better
preparation strategies, and “improved study habits”. Moreover, there are three negative
impacts of the law, namely “mental challenges brought by overemphasizing exam
preparation,” “difficulty adjusting to new subjects on the board examination,” and “drives to
not take criminologist licensure examination”. These findings can contribute to the
improvement of the education and preparation provided to criminology students at Baguio
central University, ensuring a better result in their licensure exams.
On the other hand, according to Gadek (2016), when choosing universities and colleges
offering criminal justice degree programs, it is crucial to consider their accreditation status.
Accreditation serves to ensure that the educational opportunities provided by these
institutions meet the necessary standards of quality. Evaluation criteria are established by
private educational associations at regional or national levels, which conduct reviews to
determine whether these standards are being met. Institutions and programs that meet the
criteria set by these accrediting agencies are granted accreditation.
Republic Act No. 7722, often known as the "Higher Education Act of 1994," established
the Criminal Justice Education program in the Philippines. By strengthening teacher training
and instruction at the national level, the main objective is to raise the standard of education
and promote a system of superiority in criminology education (Asuncion, 2019). The
Philippine College of Criminology (PCCr), previously known as Plaridel College 1956, is
located in Sta. Cruz, Manila, holds the distinction of being the pioneering educational
institution in the Philippines to offer a criminology course. In response to the impact of
international scholars and rising crime rates within the nation, an institution dedicated to
scientific crime detection was founded in the 1950s. Additionally, during the early 1960s,
various colleges and universities across the country began offering courses in criminology in
nearly every region. (Eduardo, 2018, p. 8).
In the period from 1987 to the early part of 2001, the field of criminology experienced a
surge in popularity, becoming one of the most sought-after disciplines in the country. (Sta.
Teresa, 2023). Acquiring a professional license in a specific field can be achieved by
completing a board examination, as stated by Dela Cruz and Cruz (2013). The Professional
Regulation Commission (PRC) is a governmental body responsible for overseeing the
proficient and specialized labor force of the Philippines. Its primary objective is to deliver up-
to-date services and adhere to the highest standards when administering licensure
examinations (Bongabong et al., 2023).
Later on, November 8, 2018, President Duterte signed Republic Act No. 11131, also
known as ‘The Philippine Criminology Act of 2018, that effectively repeals RA No. 6506 and
created the Board of Examiners for Criminologists in the country. By RA 11131, individuals
who aspire to become criminologists must achieve a weighted average rating of 75 percent,
with no grade of 60 percent in all subjects, to successfully pass the licensure examination.
This requirement is essential for those seeking to pursue a career in the field of criminology
(Gita, 2018). The purpose of the new legislation is to establish guidelines for the assessment,
enrollment, and licensing of individuals in the field of criminology. Additionally, it aims to
oversee, manage, and regulate the activities of criminology practitioners and enhance their
professional skills. The legislation acknowledges the significant role that criminologists play
in ensuring national security, public safety, and the maintenance of peace and order, as well
as contributing to the overall progress and growth of the nation (Musico, 2018).
The criminologist licensure examinations are held annually by the PRC as part of the 43
board exams. It serves as a screening process for individuals who aspire to become
criminologists by the requirements outlined in the Philippine Criminology Profession Act of
2018, also known as RA 11131 (Cruz, 2013). As stated by Manwong (2023), the
Criminology Board Examination has continually had a low passing percentage over the years.
According to Philippine Regulation Commission (PRC) data, the passing percentage has been
declining since 1995, peaking at 60% in 1995.
The criminologist licensure examinations held in December 2022 had a total of 33,489
participants. Out of these, only 11,098 individuals were able to successfully pass the
examination, which represents a pass rate of approximately 33.14% (Gomez, 2023). In April
2023, a total of 13,000 individuals took the criminology board exam. Among them, 4,139
successfully passed the examination, which accounts for approximately 31.84% of the entire
test-taker population. In August 2023, the PRC announced that out of 17,576 exam takers,
only 5,743 successfully passed (Cueva, 2023).
The competence and intellectual aptitude of an institution’s students are often assessed
through their results in licensure examinations, which are considered to be a dependable
measure of the institution’s effectiveness (Plasus and Diamante, 2020). Exam preparation
holds crucial significance in a student’s academic journey as it guarantees success in exams
and enhances understanding of the subject matter. It involves meticulous planning,
unwavering commitment, and dedicated effort (Raj, 2023).
Albina et al. (2022) conducted a study to determine the factors that contribute to the
success of the CLE and the challenges faced by candidates in preparing for and taking the
exam. They also analyzed the differences and relationships between the perceived factors and
challenges for different groups of respondents. Interrupted schooling is another factor that
contributes to students not passing the CLE. Participants believed that continuous education is
more beneficial compared to pausing education and returning to school after a few years. The
study conducted by Espartero (2022) uncovered those various elements, including students,
home and family environment, school, review center, and personal factors, greatly impact
performance in licensure examinations. The participants considered the challenges
encountered during CLE preparation and examination to be serious.
A study conducted by Alimondo et al. (2013) explored various factors that may
influence the performance of criminology students and other university board exam takers in
licensure examinations. Of these factors, one major cause of failure in the exam is attributed
to inadequate reading comprehension skills among test-takers. The study suggests that
improving skills such as word attack skills, analysis, and evaluation can assist test-takers in
understanding the requirements of each item in the exam. The format of the simulated board
examination emphasizes the importance of subject matter expertise in addition to reading
comprehension skills. This is particularly crucial for comprehensive exams such as board
exams, where solid background knowledge significantly contributes to success.
Theoretical Framework
This study was supported by the following theories that would be helpful for the
researchers in the analysis of the knowledge, attitude, and practices of the criminology
graduating students of Bachelor of Science in Criminology at Baguio Central University.
Goal Setting Theory. Locke et al. (1981) defined "goal" in Goal- Setting Theory (GST)
as "what an individual is attempting to accomplish; it is the object or aim of an action" (p.
126). According to Latham and Locke (2007), "a specific high goal leads to even higher
performance than simply urging people to do their best" (p. 291).
Gardner et al. (2016) found that goal-creating helped assist new students in acquiring
skills, particularly when students developed specific techniques and goal orientations. The
study discovered that when students have clearer and more defined goals, they do better in
class.
Theory of Constructivism. The constructivist theory is based on the idea that learners
actively participate in their learning process. It implies that knowledge is built through
experience. When people encounter new events, they reflect on their experiences and add new
ideas to their existing knowledge. Learners construct schemas to arrange the information they
acquire. Influential thinkers such as Dewey, Piaget, Vygotsky, Gagne, and Bruner pioneered
this method of learning (Kurt, 2021).
Bandura's social learning theory can help students achieve their goals as they copy each
other and the teacher. According to Bandura (1977), students will imitate a good role model
who is open to all students and holds them accountable. As such, by not letting students turn
in work after the due date, teachers reinforce the value of accountability. Students can learn
that they are held to this standard for all work.
Self-Efficacy Theory. Albert Bandura’s self-efficacy theory states that people tend to
achieve success when they are confident in their abilities. He believed that this prospect was a
remarkable player in achieving goals. Self-efficacy beliefs can be low and negative or high
and positive. A person with low self-efficacy tends to doubt their abilities, see failures as
failures, and show reluctance to complete demanding tasks. On the other hand, a person with
high self-efficacy is confident in their abilities, sees failures as learning experiences, and
completes complex projects. (Byron-Cox,2023)
One of the best indicators of a student's academic success is their level of self-efficacy
(Klomegah, 2007). A person's confidence in their ability to carry out the actions required to
achieve particular performance goals (Bandura, 1977) According to Boekaerts and Cascallar
(2006), students' self-efficacy beliefs affect the decisions they make and the amount of effort
they put into their performance.
Cognitive Load Theory. It was developed by John Sewell in the 1980s, with an emphasis
on the cognitive load that problem-solving and learning new material place on learners
(Chandler & Sweller, 1991). To regulate working memory load, CLT is divided into three
categories: relevant, extraneous, and intrinsic cognitive burden. According to the concept of
intrinsic cognitive load, certain knowledge is unchangeable and will always be challenging.
When there is too much cognitive load, information can be manipulated to remove irrelevant
or redundant information and leave only the most important information accessible for
learning. The German cognitive load suggests that learning can be improved by presenting
pertinent facts in a way that aids in the construction of knowledge. for instance, when
information is given in smaller, simpler-to-more-complex portions or when important points
are bolded. (Paas et al., 2003).
The process frame includes the employment of mixed methods, interviews, interviews,
and the distribution of a survey questionnaire as the data collection instrument. The factor
analysis be utilized as the main data analysis, tallying the results that were collected.
Interpretation and discussing the results as explanatory information about the data.
Lastly, the output frame covers the main result of the data analysis as the answer to the
objective of the study.
Hypotheses: 1 & 2
1. The level of awareness among graduating students about RA is neither high
nor low.
2. The awareness of graduating students towards the factors influence by
the RA 11131 is neither high nor low.
Assumption: 3
3. There is a positive impact of RA 11131 in the preparation of graduating
students for a board licensure examination.
Criminology Students. This study can help the criminology student learn about the
problem and situation and prepare for the future licensure examination.
Academe. Through this research, the academe shall know the conditions that
criminology graduating students face in their preparation for the licensure examination
and the challenges posed by RA 11131. It can aid in identifying the areas where
additional resources, training, or support may be necessary to improve the student's
preparation for the licensure examination.
Researchers. This research would improve their skill, strategy, and knowledge
of engaging research. These benefits collectively contribute to their development as
respected and influential researchers in the field of criminology.
Future Researcher. This study serves as a guide for future researchers as they
undertake the same endeavor. Researching the same topic allows future researchers to
build upon the findings and gaps identified by previous studies. They can contribute to
the body of knowledge by providing new insights, expanding the scope of the study, or
using different research methodologies.
METHODOLOGY
Research Design
On the other hand, according to Tenny et al. (2022), qualitative research, a form
of inquiry, delves into real-world issues, offering a profound understanding of the
subjects. Unlike quantitative research, which focuses on numerical data and experimental
interventions, qualitative research aids in the formulation of hypotheses and facilitates a
deeper comprehension of quantitative data. It involves gathering an individual’s
experiences, perceptions, and behaviors to gain valuable insights.
Locale and Population of the Study
The study was conducted at Baguio Central University, which is one of the
colleges offering the Bachelor of Science in Criminology through the College of
Criminal Justice Education. The target of this study is the criminology graduating
students from Baguio Central University College of Criminal Justice Education who
were enrolled in Internship 2. Specifically, the target respondents are those who are
preparing to take the board examination. Based on the record of the master list, the
sample size for the target respondents is fifty-seven (57) individuals. This research aims
to examine their experiences, perspectives, awareness of RA 11131, and preparedness
for the upcoming board examination.
The survey and interview are the tools for gathering the data needed for the study.
The researchers distribute a survey questionnaire and conducts an interview that is
administered to the target respondent and used to gather data on all variables examined in
this research. The first part of the questionnaire is composed of closed-ended questions,
and it focuses on the awareness among graduating students about RA 11131; The second
part is composed of closed-ended questions that determine the factors that influence the
awareness of graduating students towards RA 11131; The third part is a series of serious,
open-ended questions that were utilized in the conduct of an interview that focuses on the
impact of the provisions of RA 11131 as perceived by the graduating students of Baguio
Central University.
First, the researchers wrote a letter of request to the dean of the school for
permission to administer a survey questionnaire and conduct an interview with the
respondents, and a letter to the registrar for a copy of the master list of the respondents
and informed consent. After getting permission, the researchers constructed a survey
questionnaire and an interview guide questionnaire, validated by an expert in the field.
Second, the researchers looked for 57 respondents who are currently enrolled in
Internship 2 for a bachelor of science in criminology. Third, the researchers asked for the
respondent’s consent to participate in the study and the use of a voice recorder for the
interview. Fourth, for the data gathering, the researchers personally administer the survey
questionnaire to the targeted respondents through a face-to-face survey. Afterward, it was
collected, and the interview guide was carried out during the participant's spare time,
before or after their class, ensuring minimal disruption to their daily routines and
schedules. The researchers assured the confidentiality of their sheets and also understood
that respondents’ consciousness affected their answers. Therefore, the researchers gave
the respondents the option of being anonymous. Lastly, after gathering data, the
researchers critically calculated, evaluated, interpreted, and analyzed the data to generate
answers to the study's problem.
Treatment of Data
The researchers have tabulated, tallied, and analyzed the collected data to ensure
its strength and check its accuracy and subject it to a 4- point Likert scale. The midpoint
of each range of the 4-point Likert-type scale is used to determine the statistical limit. To
find the midpoint of each range, the researchers add the lower and upper bounds of each
range and divide the midpoints for each range, the researchers calculate the statistical
limit by finding the maximum and minimum values from these midpoints. The highest
midpoint among all ranges is used as the upper bound of the statistical limit. The lowest
midpoint among all ranges is used as the lower bound of the statistical limit.
This chapter presents the findings from the survey questionnaire and interviews.
As mentioned in the previous chapter, the researchers chose 57 respondents in total
among Baguio Central University’s graduating criminology students. The data were
evaluated and presented in this chapter through statistical and thematic analysis.
Regarding the qualification of an applicant for the licensure exam, reveals only
three indicators were highly understood by respondents. First is “possessing a good
moral character” with a weighted mean of 3.57. Second was the “no conviction for
offenses involving moral turpitude” with a weighted mean of 3.52. Third were “holding a
bachelor’s degree in criminology” with a weighted mean of 3.50. These three
qualifications stand out among the criteria evaluated for licensing examinations.
This implies that most respondents displayed good knowledge on the key
provisions of RA 11131, as perceived by graduating students. This was evident from
having a good moral character. This factor stood out as the first visible indicator of their
understanding
Moving on to second indicator presents the respondents' level of awareness on the
weight distribution of the exam subjects. First, 20% of the overall weighted average will
come from law enforcement administration with a weighted mean of 3.24; second, 20%
will come from criminalistics with a weighted mean of 3.22; and third, 15% will come
from crime detection and investigation with a weighted mean of 3.21. These are the three
highest indicators.
This implies that the respondents are aware that 20% of the weight distribution
will come from the subject of law enforcement administration, it means that this topic
hold a certain level of importance in the overall subjects in the licensure exam.
The University of Baguio study (Tad-awan et al., 2022) states that the criminal
justice system as a whole is involved in the administration of justice. The first pillar of
the justice system is law enforcement, which serves as the first point of contact. They
had to find crimes, apprehend criminals, conduct investigations, and make case files. For
criminology students interested in pursuing careers in law enforcement or related fields,
knowledge of law enforcement administration is indispensable. It provides them with
the foundational knowledge and skills necessary to succeed in roles such as police
officers, detectives, crime analysts, or administrators within law enforcement agencies.
Moving on to the rating for licensure examination shows how aware the
respondents. The highest indicator is that a “candidate must obtain a weighted average
rating of seventy-five percent (75%) with no grade less than sixty percent (60%) in any
given subject” with a weighted mean of 3.50. The second is that “any examinee who
fails three (3) or more board subjects shall be deemed to have failed the board
examination” with a weighted mean of 3.40. Third, “if the examinee obtains a weighted
average rating of seventy-five percent (75%) but has a grade below sixty percent (60%)
in any of the subjects, the result shall be deferred” with a weighted mean of 3.24.
This implies that the respondents are aware that in order to pass the board
licensure examination of criminologist, they have to obtain a weighted average of 75%
with no grades less than 60% in any subjects. Performance in the board examinations
is taken as one of the measures of the quality of a program. If the rate of the first
attempt passing is high, it is a good measure of program excellence (Guinayen, 2023).
To successfully complete the registration exams, candidates must pass the passing rate.
Examinee who fails 3 times or more subject shall deemed to have failed the board
examination. Failed is defined as a lack of success or the inability to meet an
expectation (Thomas, 2021). Deferred is when 1 or 2 board exam subjects are 60%
below provided that the general average is at least 75%. In the study conducted by
Martinez et al. (2018), their findings suggested that there was indeed a significant
relationship between exam deferral and failure in board exams. Students who deferred
exams were more likely to experience lower performance or failure in their board
examinations compared to those who did not defer exams.
The overall responses from the respondents have exhibited a good understanding
in regards to the qualifications of an applicant for the licensure, as well as the weight
distribution among subjects of licensure exam and the importance of rating in the
licensure examination. This criterion was outlined in RA 11131.
Regarding to the first indicator presents the respondent’s level of difficulty on the
comprehension. First was the “remembering” with a weighted mean of 3.03. Second was
the “understanding” with a weighted mean of 2.89. Third was the “creating” with a
weighted mean of 2.84.
This implies that the respondents are having difficulties in remembering the
information they needed to successfully pass the board licensure examination. This
struggle to recall details may have negatively affected their preparation for the upcoming
board licensure examination.
This implies that the respondents are facing difficulties in studying the materials
and resources provided by the university for the board examination. This suggest that
they are encountering difficulties in effectively engaging with the study materials and
utilizing the resources provided to them.
In relation the theory of Dual coding refers to the concept of employing diverse
forms of stimuli to assist learners in encoding information in their minds more efficiently,
thereby facilitating its retrieval in the future with greater ease (Clark, 2021). When
preparing for board examinations, students can benefit from study materials that
incorporate diagrams, charts, graphs, and other visual aids alongside written
explanations. This dual coding approach facilitates deeper understanding and improves
retention of key concepts.
Moving on to the workload shows three highest indicators. First, “the respondents
feel overwhelmed with their workload, making it harder to focus on studying for the
exam” with a weighted mean of .94. Second was the “balancing exam preparation with
other responsibilities is challenging for the respondents” with a weighted mean of 2.87;
and third, “the workload and study requirements for the licensure exam are manageable”
with a weighted mean of 2.82.
This implies that the respondents are having difficulties focusing on studying for
the licensure exam. This difficulty is attributed to feeling overwhelmed with their
workload. It can be inferred that the respondents are finding it challenging to balance
their study commitments with other responsibilities, leading to a lack of concentration.
Every piece of legislation is established with the intention of serving the interests
and welfare of the public. Similarly, Republic Act 11131 has had a positive impact on
criminology graduating students as they gear up for the criminology licensure
examination. This law has been instrumental in enhancing the preparedness and
competence of aspiring criminologists.
The respondents interviewed emphasized that Republic Act 11131 has had a
beneficial effect on their preparation for the board exam. They feel more motivated to
study extensively and read more on their materials due to the increased standards and
restricted opportunities to attempt the exam. This heightened sense of commitment
stems from the awareness that a higher score is required and the chances of re-taking the
board examination are limited. One of the key informants explained,
R1: “Dahil sa pag-papatupad ng RA 11131, nalilimitahan nito yung attempt sa
board exam dahil dito, dahil din dito ay mas namomotivate akong mag review ng
mabuti”
A supportive study like the one conducted by Dunlosky, et al. (2013) examines
various learning techniques and their effectiveness in improving student learning and
exam preparation. The study identifies several techniques such as spaced practice,
retrieval practice, elaborative interrogation, and self-explanation, which have been shown
to enhance learning and retention of information.
R2: “Mas nakikita ko ang plano ko pag katapos kong mag graduate. Pero
kailangan ko muna na maipasa ang board licensure examination para makamit
ang gusto kong career”
(I can see what I will do when I graduate. I should pass the board licensure
examination first to get into the career I want).
This implies that this legislation acts as a guiding beacon, directing individuals
towards informed decisions to enhance their academic and professional pursuits after
graduation.
This finding corroborated by the theory of Creating a roadmap for career involves
setting goals, acquiring skills, and navigating opportunities. The Career Anchors theory,
developed by Schein (1978), provides a framework for understanding individuals' core
values and motivations in their careers. These anchors serve as a foundation for career
decisions and aspirations. When creating a career roadmap, understanding your career
anchors can help you align your goals and actions with what truly matters to you.
K3: “Naging mas disiplinado ako para sa paghanda ng maaga para sa board
exam”
(It developed my discipline to prepare early for the board exam)
This implies that it heightened the sense of accountability and the commitment to
their studies reflects a positive impact of RA 11131 on their overall academic motivation
and performance. This legislative repeal has led to a significant shift in the way
respondents approach their academic endeavors, encouraging them to strive for a deeper
level of engagement and knowledge acquisition.
A supportive study like the one conducted by Priya (2023) investigates the
relationship between students' study habits and their academic performance. It explores
various factors such as time management, concentration, note-taking, and reading habits,
and how they impact students' academic success. The findings provide insights into the
importance of cultivating effective study habits for better educational outcomes.
R4: “Dahil sa bagong rating at yung mga standandar mas lalo akong nahihirapan,
na prepresure at stress ako kapag naiisip ko yung required na passing rate para
maka-pasa”
(The new rating and standard have become increasingly burdensome and
challenging, intensifying the stress and pressure associated with meeting the
required passing rate).
In relation to this, Schafer (1996) noted that the most bothersome daily challenges
often revolve around school-related stressors, including the constant pressure to study,
insufficient time, the demands of writing term papers, taking exams, contemplating future
plans, and dealing with uninteresting instructors. Students encounter academic stress
from a combination of their personal aspirations for excellence and the external
expectations coming from their parents and teachers (Ang and Huan, 2006).
In addition to the existing challenges such as the limited take to pass in the
criminologist licensure exam and the heightened passing standards, there is a notable
inclusion of new subjects on the examination. This development has proven to be
disadvantageous, particularly for respondents from the old curriculum. Some of the
respondent express difficulties in grasping the content, format, and anticipated outcomes
of the new subjects. Key informant 5 describe
This implies that they need to juggle their existing academic load while adjusting
themselves to unfamiliar subjects has created a sense of overwhelm among the
respondents. This situation is exacerbated by the pressing time constraints associated
with preparing for the board examination, requiring them to navigate a balance between
familiar material and the new learning requirements.
The finding corroborated by the theory of constructivism, a theoretical
perspective that emphasizes the pivotal role of learners in actively constructing their
knowledge. Rather than passively receiving facts, learners are encouraged to engage in
critical thinking, develop mental frameworks, and incorporate newfound knowledge into
their existing cognitive structures. By adopting this approach, individuals promote
profound learning and improve their grasp of subjects (Mcleod, 2024).
R6: “Naiisip ko nga kung mag tatake pa ba ako ng board exam o hindi na”
(There is hesitation about whether I should take the board licensure examination
or not).
This implies that the changes have evoked feelings of anxiety and stress among
the respondents, leading them to not take the exam post- graduation and causing them to
question their ability to meet the revised criteria.
The finding corroborated by the theory of Albert Bandura's self- efficacy theory
emphasizes that individuals are more likely to succeed when they have confidence in
their own capabilities. According to his theory, believing in one's ability plays a pivotal
role in goal achievement.
Self-efficacy beliefs can vary from being low and negative to high and positive.
Individuals with low self-efficacy often harbor doubts about their competencies,
perceive failures as definitive, and exhibit hesitancy when faced with challenging tasks.
Conversely, individuals with high self-efficacy exhibit a strong belief in their skills,
view failures as opportunities for growth and improvement, and display a willingness
to undertake complex endeavors (Byron-Cox, 2023).
However, based on the research findings, it was found that graduating students in
Criminology are encountering difficulties. The study revealed that these students are
facing challenges with their comprehension abilities especially in remembering.
Additionally, it was pointed out that they are having difficulties with the utilization of the
resources and study materials provided by the institution for preparation to the board
examinations and, lastly, handling their workload making it harder for them to focus on
studying for the exam. This data highlights the diverse challenges these criminology
students need to overcome as
The enactment of RA 11131 has had both positive and negative impacts on
criminology graduating students, particularly in relation to their readiness for the
criminology licensure examination. The study revealed that the law has brought positive
effects, namely motivation to study better and better preparation strategies. Moreover, it
has prompted them to improved study habits. However, on the negative impacts, the
students encountered mental challenges brought by overemphasizing exam preparation,
difficulty adjusting to new subjects on the board examination, and drives to not take the
criminologist licensure examination.
Recommendation
To Madam Margarita Cecilda B. Rillera, PhD, the President of the Baguio Central
University for a great avenue for continuous professional development.
To Dr. Ramon L. Kindipan Sr., for his support, guidance, and leadership in
fostering a conducive academic environment at Baguio Central University.
To Mrs. Beca May Pidlao Palitayan, for her invaluable guidance, patience, and
expertise throughout the entire research process. Her insightful feedback and constant
encouragement have been instrumental in shaping this research and pushing the
researchers toward achieving a deeper understanding of the topic.
To the panel members, Mr. Ernesto Bucalan, Mr. Ramon L. Kindipan Jr., Mrs.
Rowena B. Gagno, and Ms. Princess Joy B. Moyaen, for generously devoting their time.
Their extensive knowledge, critical evaluation, and constructive feedback have
immensely contributed to the refinement and credibility of this research. Their valuable
insights and suggestions have helped the researchers navigate various challenges and
significantly improve the outcome of this study.
Lastly, the researchers are thankful to all individuals who have contributed to the
completion of this research topic; their support, patience, and understanding have been
the driving force behind their success.
K.B.O.
R.B.S.
F.B.S.
J.M.S
P.C.W.
REFERENCES
A. Books
Adanza, E., Bermudo, P., Rasonabe, M. (2009). Methods of Research: A Primer. (p. 129)
Rex Books Store Inc.
Schafer, W. (1996). Passing the test of college stress. In W. Schafer (Ed.), Stress
management for wellness (pp.543–563). Orlando: Harcourt Brace.
B. Journals
Boekaerts, M., and Cascallar, E. (2006). How far have we moved toward the integration
of theory and practice in self-regulation? Educ.
Psychol. Rev. 18, pp. 199–210. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9013-4
Bongabong, M., Embuscado, F., Falcone, E., Vigonte, F., & Abante, M. V.
(2023).
Demographics and Assessment of the Computer=Based Licensure
Examination (CBLE) of the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC): an
input for funding proposal. https://doi.org /10.2139/
Chan, T. W., Looi, C. K., Chang, B., Chen, W., Wong, L. H.,
Wong, S. L., Yu, F., Mason, J., Liu, C., Shih, J. L., Wu, Y. T., Kong,
S. C., Wu, L., Chien, T. C., Liao, C. C., Cheng, H. N., Chen, Z. H.,
& Chou, C. (2019). IDC theory: creation and the creation loop.
Research and Practice in Technology Enchanced Learning (Print),
14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0120-5
Chandler, P., Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction.
Universiy of Wollonggong Australia. https://ro.u ow. edu.au/edupapers/128/
Clark, C., & Mayer, E., (2011). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven
Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. San Fransisco,
CA: Pfeiffer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002
/9781118255971
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Self-Determination Theory. In Elsevier eBooks (pp.
486–491). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0- 08-097086-8.26036-4
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013).
Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising
directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in
the Public
Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
Gardner, K.A., Diesen, D.L., Hogg, D., & Huerta, S. (2016). The impact of goal setting and
goal orientation on performance during a clerkship surgical skills training program.
The American Journal of Surgery, 211(2), 321-325.
Guadamor, M., Pascua, J., Eusebio, J., Dawaton, A., & Doquilla, D. (2021). THE
INTERVENING EFFECTS OF STUDENT AND SCHOOL RELATED
FACTORS ON THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF BACHELOR OF
SCIENCE IN CRIMINOLOGY. ResearchGate.
file:///home/chronos/u5aae790b3be714d86fb3630f1eff09c6eaa9
ef67/MyFiles/Downloads/70.pdf
Habiatan, E., (2019). Bachelor of Science in Criminology Program: Extent of
Compliance on the Policies and Standards Prescribed by The Commission on
Higher Education. https://garph.co.uk
/IJARMSS/Oct2019/G-2751.pdf
Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (2007). New developments in and directions for goal-
setting research. European Psychologist, (p.291). https://psycnet.apa.org/doi
/10.1027/1016-9040.12.4.290
Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal setting and
task performance: 1969–1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90(1), p. 126.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-
2909.90.1.125
Martinez, J. P., Mendoza, J. S., Mamauag, E. P., & Manzano, G. R. (2018). The Impact
of Exam Deferral on Performance in Medical Board Examinations: A Single
Institutional Experience. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular
Development, 5, 2382120518802987
Mayer, R., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia
learning. Educational Psychologist. https://psycnet.apa.org
/doi/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6.
Parinas, M., Obero (2012). Relevance of the topics in the Criminologist Licensure
Examination Review Program of the University
of Northern Philippines. https://vector.unp.edu.ph/index
.php/1/article/view/25
Patel, C. J., Gali, V. S., Patel, D. V., and Parmar, R. D. (2011). The effects of information
and communication technologies (ICTs) on higher education: from objectivism to
social constructivism. Int. J. Vocation. Tech. Educ. 3, 113–120.
https://africaneditors.org
/journal/IJVTE/abstract/69579-118992
Seemiller, C., and Grace, M. (2017). Generation Z: educating and engaging the next
generation students. About Campus. 22, 21–26. doi: 10.1002/abc.21293
Cruz, A. (2013). Everything you need to know about the Criminology Board Exam.
Edukasyon.ph https:// www.edukasyon.ph/blog
/everything-you -need-to-know-about-the-criminology-board-exam
Dela Cruz, N., & Cruz, C. (2013). DLSU Board Exams: Performance and Expectations. The
LaSallian. https://thelasallian.com/2013
/11/23 /dlsu-board-exams-performance-and-expectations/
Gadek, R. (2016). Accreditation for criminal justice colleges
and universities. https://criminaljusticeonlineblog.com/10/ accreditation-
for-criminal-justice-colleges-and-universities
/?fbclid=IwAR0dMA67r_oobD_hv044GZf54uNjGaqpZyWKCSTmQfP P-
Ek56VQh-43eLuE
Gagalac, R., (2018). “Mas Mahigpit” na board exam sa criminology, Naisabatas Na.
https://news.abs-cbn.com/news/11/22/18/mas- mahigpit-na-board-exam-sa-
criminology-naisabatas-na
Mayer, R., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia
learning. Educational Psychologist. https://psycne t.apa.org
/doi/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6.
Mcleod, S., PhD. (2023). Albert Bandura’s Social Learning Theory. Simply Psychology.
https://www. simplypsychology.org/bandura.html
Raj, S. (2023). How to prepare for exams: An ultimate guide on exam preparations.
iDreamCareer.https: //idreamcareer.com/blog/how- toprepare-for-exams/?
fbclid=IwAR2Aqr3IwMwSQ4aKkv9ff69Fks1
gp1lOyuT3hvOa6VR1hxbWMqXdSlcA1VM
Schein, E.H. (1978) Career Dynamics: Matching Individual
and Organizational Needs. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Boston.
Tenny, S. Brannan, M., & Brannan, D (2022). Qualitative study. StatPearls - NCBI
Bookshelf. https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih
.gov/books/ NBK470395
Thomas, P. (2021). What is failure and how can we make the most of it?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www. betterup.com/blog/what- is-failure
%3fhs_amp=true
Name (optional):
Instruction: Please check (/) according your level of knowledge and level of difficulty
with the following statement by selecting the appropriate response on the scale from 1 to
4, were
4-Highly Aware: This category represents individuals who possess extensive and in-
depth knowledge of the subject matter. They are likely to have a comprehensive
understanding, including advanced concepts related to the topic.
3- Moderately Aware: This category suggests that respondents have a good
understanding of the topic and possess depth of knowledge. They are likely able to
discuss and analyze the subject matter with a moderate level of expertise.
2- Slightly Aware: Respondents falling into this category are likely to possess a basic
understanding of the subject matter. They may have some familiarity with key concepts
but may lack in-depth knowledge.
1- Aware: This category likely represents individuals who have little to no
understanding of the subject matter. They may lack basic knowledge or have
misconceptions about the topic.
Qualifications of an Applicant 4 3 2 1
for the Licensure Examination (HA) (MA) (SA) (A)
1. Must be a citizen of the Philippines or a foreign
citizen whose country/state has reciprocity with
the Philippines in the
practice of criminology
2. Must be of good moral character, good reputation
and of sound mind and body certified by the school
where he/she graduated and the barangay where
he/she lives, unless the examinee is a foreign national
a certification from any
professional of good standing will do
3-Difficult: This choice suggests that the statement or question is quite challenging,
requiring significant effort or cognitive processing.
1- Not Difficult: This option represents the extreme end of the scale, indicating
that the statement or question is not difficult
1 2 3 4
A. Comprehension (ND) (MD) (D) (VD)
1. REMEMBERING: Recall information,
Recognizing, Listing, Describing, Retrieving,
Naming, Finding
2. UNDERSTANDING: Explain, Interpret,
Summarize, Exam paraphrase
3. APPLYING: Using the information in another
familiar, Situation implementing
carrying out, using, executing
4. ANALYZING: Understanding, Comparing,
Organizing, Deconstructing, Finding
5. EVALUATING: Hypothesizing, Critiquing,
Experimenting
6. CREATING: Generating, Designing,
Constructing, Planning, Producing, Inventing
1 2 3 4
B. Preparedness (ND) (MD) (V) (VD)
1. The resources and study materials provided by my
institution have adequately
prepared me for the board examination
2. Support and guidance from faculty or
mentor
3. The knowledge and skills I have acquired during
my criminology program adequately
prepare me for the board examination
4. The mock exams and practice tests I have taken
have helped me gauge my level
of preparedness for the board examination
5. I have actively engaged in self-study and
revision to enhance my preparedness for the board
examination
1 2 3 4
C. Workload (ND) (MD) (D) (VD)
1. Feel overwhelmed with your workload,
making it harder to focus on studying for the exam
B. How has RA 11131 changed the way you approach your studies as a criminology
graduating student?
D. Can you describe a specific situation where RA 11131 had an impact on your
studies or your preparation for the criminologist licensure examination?
E. Overall in your opinion, how does RA 11131 positively or negatively impacted
you as a criminology graduating student? Why?
BIONOTE OF RESEARCHERS
Janine Pearl Mendoza Solang, Filipino, single, born on September 23, 2003 at
Socbot, Pinukpuk, Kalinga and currently residing at #2 Purok 7 Pinsao Pilot Project
Baguio City. Her parents are Robinson Batay-an Solang and Maribel Mendoza Solang.
At present, she is studying Bachelor of Science in Criminology at Baguio Central
University, Magsaysay Campus, Baguio City. She finished her secondary level at
Saint Theresita's School of Tabuk on 2021 and at Socbot Elementary School on 2015 for
her primary studies.
Rowel Balanggao Sacki, Filipino, single, born on November 7, 2000 at Baguio
City, and currently residing at #2495 Sitio-Chosol, Virac Itogon, Benguet. His parents
are Ronnie Suyao Sacki and Lapinia Balanggao Sacki. At present, he is studying
Bachelor of Science in Criminology at Baguio Central University, Magsaysay
Campus, Baguio City. He finished his secondary level at Baguio City National High
School on 2019 and at Fort Del Pilar Elementary School on 2013 for his primary
studies.
Princess Camille Calahi Wacnagan, Filipino, single, born on January 25, 2003
at Kabugao, Apayao and currently residing at Greenvalley, Baguio City. Her parents
are Nanette Wacnagan and Jay Wacnagan. At present, she is studying Bachelor of
Science in Criminology at Baguio Central University, Magsaysay Campus, Baguio
City. She finished her secondary level at Kabugao Agro-Industrial High School on 2019
and at Tabuk Central School on 2015 for her primary studies.
Kajelyne Balas Ottao, Filipino, single, born on May 2,1999 at Lepanto
Mankayan and currently residing at Kias Baguio City. Her parents are Castillo Liban
Ottao and Adela Nancy Balas Ottao. At present, she is studying Bachelor of Science in
Criminology at Baguio Central University, Magsaysay Campus, Baguio City. She
finished her secondary level at Baguio Collage Technology on 2021 and at Balatoc
Elementary School on 2015 for her primary studies.
Freddie Bati Sicwaten Jr., Filipino, single, born on March 28, 2003at Baguio
City, and currently residing at San Carlos Hts. Irisan, Baguio City. His parents are
Friedy Beyden Sicwaten and Mary Jane Bati Sicwaten. At present, he is studying
Bachelor of Science in Criminology at Baguio Central University, Magsaysay
Campus, Baguio City. He finished his secondary level at the same university on 2019
and at Quezon Hill Elementary School on 2015 for his primary studies.