Farriery for Low Heels in Hind Feet
Farriery for Low Heels in Hind Feet
Authors’ addresses: Virginia Therapeutic Farriery, 833 Zion Hill Rd., Keswick, VA, 22947
(O’Grady); Turner Sports Medicine and Surgery, 10777 110th St., Stillwater, MN 55082 (Turner), Ridley
Horseshoeing, 1984 Fisher Avenue, Leighton, IA 50143 (Ridley); e-mail: sogrady@[Link]. *Corre-
sponding and presenting author. © 2018 AAEP.
NOTES
Fig. 2. A, Lateral view of a hind foot with good conformation. Black line is the hoof pastern axis, red line is the middle of the foot,
yellow line is the proportions of foot on either side of the middle of the foot, and green line is the appropriate length of a hind shoe.
B, Solar view of a hind foot. Red lines are the widest part of foot and the proportions of ground surface on either side, and the yellow
line is the base of the frog. Note the widest part of the foot is located further plantarly compared to the forefoot.
conformation are 53–57% dorsal to the COR and ful method to evaluate stance is to view a trajectory
43– 47% palmar to the COR.c,11 In all radiographs, by using a line starting at the ground through the
the COR was found to be further plantar in the hind angle formed by the coronet of the hind foot. With
foot, which significantly decreased the ground sur- low heels, this trajectory line will project to the
face of the foot plantar to the COR. Furthermore, elbow of the forelimb rather than to the palmar
in all radiographs, the digital alignment was not com- surface of the radius just above the carpus with good
pletely straight, as the middle phalanx was mildly hind foot conformation (Fig. 4).12 In motion, the
displaced in a distal plantar direction relative to the horse may show a short, stilted gait with a markedly
distal phalanx (Fig. 3). shortened cranial phase of the stride; there may be
frequent stumbling noted and the signs of discom-
4. Clinical Examination
fort may increase when the horse is trotted in a
Observations circle. On hoof tester examination, the horse may
Performance problems or soundness issues that show discomfort at the inner part of the sole just
have been associated with this hind foot conforma- dorsal to the apex of the frog and at the angle of the
tion are a subtle bilateral lameness, poor perfor- sole at the heels. The sole/heels may also deform in
mance, a stiff hind limb gait, lack of impulsion, these areas when pressure is applied depending on
change in attitude, or bad behavior. If the “bull the amount of structural damage. If the abnormal
nosed”/underrun heels hind foot conformation is hoof conformation is suspected as a source of any of
moderate to severe, the horse may assume a stance the above problems, the authors suggest, if possible,
where the foot is placed further forward than normal to do a posterior digital nerve block and then with
in relation to the vertical axis of the limb and the the rider/trainer mounted, rule out a hind foot lame-
main mass of the hindquarters, thus giving the ness. An experienced rider will immediately be
horse a “sickle hocked” appearance. In one recent able to tell if there is a difference in the movement of
report, it was stated that this type of stance could be the horse and its attitude. It should be noted that
consistently related to gluteal pain.4 Another help- many horses with low heels in the hind feet do not
Fig. 3. A, Acceptable conformation for a forefoot (Courtesy Dr. Andrew Parks). B, Acceptable conformation for a hind foot (Courtesy
Dr. Kurt Selberg). Yellow line is COR, green line is widest part of the foot, brown line is distance from COR to dorsal hoof wall, and
red line is ground surface on the solar surface of the foot.
Fig. 5. A, Lateral view of a moderate low heel “bull nose” conformation of a hind foot. Note the disparity in growth rings and the
acute angle of the coronet. B, Plantar view shows the prolapsed frog as well as the incline of the frog. C, Solar view shows the incline
of the frog in a dorsal cranial direction (black lines), and the marked concavity of the sole (red arrow).
Fig. 6. A, Hind foot from Figure 5 with shoe removed. Note the frog located below ground surface of the foot and the horse standing
on the frog rather than the hoof capsule. B, A necropsy specimen from a horse with severe low heels in the hind foot. Note the
hemorrhage in the sole. (Courtesy Michael Savoldi).
to the distal phalanx (P3) during weight bearing. as the amount of sole depth noted on the radiograph
This places excessive stresses on the plantar section or determined from the incline of the frog can be
of the hoof capsule. The COR is located further misleading. The dorsal margin of the bone mi-
plantarly with this abnormal foot conformation, grates dorsally and therefore stretches the width of
thus decreasing the ground surface in the plantar the dermis, a change which may not be recognized
section of the foot. The soft tissue structures (frog, on the radiograph (Fig. 8A). Therefore, aggressive
digital cushion) in the plantar section of the foot trimming at the toe will often result in seepage of
have prolapsed plantarly to the shoe, forming a blood at the sole wall junction as the dermal tissue is
“knob”-shaped appearance. The angle of the solar being encroached. It may be prudent to reduce the
border of the distal phalanx at the heels is lower amount of sole depth gradually over two shoeing
than the dorsal margin of the distal phalanx (i.e., a intervals. After the hoof wall is removed on the
negative plantar angle). The sole depth below the solar surface of the foot, additional horn is removed
dorsal margin of the distal phalanx is markedly from the outer hoof wall to create even or uniform
increased relative to the sole depth at the heel, and hoof wall thickness from quarter to quarter. The
the perimeter of the dorsal margin of the distal horse is then placed on a firm surface, which places
phalanx can be seen migrating toward the dorsal pressure on the frog that quickly assumes the same
hoof wall. The displacement of the distal phalanx plane as the heels on either side.
results in the “bull nose” appearance of the dorsal
hoof wall (Fig. 7).
Farriery
The amount of improvement that can be achieved
with the appropriate farriery will obviously be pro-
portional to the severity or the amount of distortion
present. Damage to the plantar section of the hind
feet is easier to improve than in the forefeet, possibly
due to the anatomy and the difference of the load
encountered on the hind limbs. The initial goal of
the farriery is to make the plantar section of the foot
“load sharing” such that the hoof wall and the frog
are on the same plane. The first step of the farriery
process will be to address the frog being located
below the hoof wall. This will depend on the sever-
ity; if mild, the horse could have its shoes removed
the day before being shod and housed on a firm
surface, or if more severe, allowed to go without hind
shoes for 3–5 days, which can be very effective. Fig. 7. Radiograph of a foot with low heels “bull nose” confor-
To begin the trim, the shoes are removed and the toe mation of the hind foot. Note the COR (red line) located further
length is reduced from quarter to quarter according plantarly than the forefoot and the decreased ground surface
to the sole depth. Caution is advised when decreas- (yellow line) plantar to the COR. Also note the negative angle of
ing the toe length in this type of foot conformation, the solar border of the distal phalanx.
Fig. 8. A, Lateral radiograph of a low heel “bull nose” foot conformation. Note the limited ground surface on the plantar side of the
COR and the leverage created on the dorsal side of the COR. Lucent area under the red arrow shows the dermis being stretched as
the margin of the distal phalanx migrates dorsally. B, Illustrates a frog plate created from a degree pad placed over the frog.
If the frog prolapse is severe, the approach can be and the frog are on the same plane, the load is
modified and the time frame shortened. The hind shared across the plantar section of the foot. The
shoes are removed a day or two before the horse is foot is now ready to have a sturdy steel shoe fitted
due to be shod, and the foot is trimmed as described and applied. The first author fit shoes to the hind
above. A frog plate is cut from a degree pad to feet in a similar manner to the front feet by using
match the frog, and the front of the pad is left intact the line drawn across the widest part of the foot
to form a half moon design. The pad is attached to placed in the middle of the shoe. However, in the
the foot with two small nails at the toe, and the foot hind feet, the widest part of the foot will be located
is wrapped in a medicated poulticed that has been further plantar than the forefeet; therefore, addi-
soaked in hot water and then secured to the foot tional shoe length is required to create the desired
with brown gauze and elastic tape (Fig. 8B). The proportions on either side of the COR (Figs. 9 –11).
horse is placed in a stall on a firm surface for 24 – 48 Looking at the shod hind foot from the side, the
hours. When the wedge pad is removed, the frog branch of the shoe should extend to or close to the
will be compressed between the heels, forming a flat point that coincides with a vertical line dropped
even plane which includes the frog and both heels. from the hairline at the bulb of the heel. If the
The horse will then be ready to have shoes applied, branch of the shoe extends beyond the vertical line
paying strict attention to the trimmed foot. or if the foot is not trimmed appropriately, the
A line is now drawn across the widest part of the length of the shoe will create excessive leverage on
foot. Any additional horn at the heels can be re- the heels. In order to keep the frog and hoof wall on
moved using the rasp in a horizontal direction across the same plane for the first shoeing interval or if
the heels and frog so the hoof wall approaches the mild heel elevation is necessary, a metal or alumi-
base of the frog to create as much ground surface as num heel plate or a 2° leather wedge can be placed
possible. Care must be taken to keep the frog and under the shoe at the heels as long as the shoe is
both heels in the same plane. When the hoof wall fitted in the manner described above. This will con-
Fig. 9. A, Lateral radiograph of a hind foot that shows the concept of increasing the ground surface plantar to the COR using a shoe.
(Courtesy Dr. Sarah Puchalski). B, Trimmed foot shows how the length of shoe (green arrows) will create approximate proportions
on either side of COR foot.
Fig. 10. Lateral radiograph of a low heel “bull nose” conformation of the hind foot before and after farriery. Note the difference in
the foot conformation after the appropriate trim and a size larger shoe. Again, note the increased ground surface plantar to the COR.
(Courtesy Dr. Hans Castelijns).
centrate the load across the frog and heels rather have an effect on hind limb biomechanics, as there is
than behind the heels, which is the case with a long no research or current literature to support these
shoe or trailers. The plate or wedge will also pre- modifications. It is the authors’ opinion that farri-
vent the frog from descending toward the ground ery begins with the appropriate trim, with the cor-
between the branches of the shoe. This is usually a rect size/placement of the shoe with any subsequent
temporary measure and it can be discontinued once modifications being secondary. The appropriate
the heels have stabilized. trim improves many hind limb issues by providing
increased ground surface in the plantar section of
5. Summary the foot combined with a shoe of sufficient length so
The low heel “bull nose” foot conformation of the that the transition from loading to propulsion min-
hind feet is often overlooked as a cause of poor per- imizes dorsiflexion of the fetlock and hock. In turn,
formance or lameness in the hind limbs. This ab- this allows the toe to push off, elevating the limb
normal foot conformation may play a dual role in into the swing phase, resulting in a smoother tran-
hind limb soundness. Firstly, the overload and sition of force from the hind limb through the sacro-
damage to the plantar section of the foot can cause iliac and lumber regions.
pain and a subtle bilateral lameness. Secondly, The incidence of this low heel “bull nose” hind foot
pain and/or the altered biomechanics of the foot will conformation in performance horses has reached ep-
cause changes in hind limb movement. The idemic proportions in recent years. There are a
changes appear to affect flexion of various joints, myriad of theories/thoughts regarding how to trim
strain on ligaments, hoof and limb flight, hoof land- the palmar/plantar section of the foot; however, the
ing/loading, and muscle tension. Veterinarians authors feel that inappropriate trimming of the
and farriers frequently use specialty shoes or modify heels decreases the ground surface in the plantar
existing shoes in an attempt to relieve pain and section of the hind foot and the application of shoes
therefore improve overall hind limb mechanics. that are too small may be the inciting cause of this
However, it is unclear whether these modifications foot confrontation.
Fig. 11. The goal of hind foot farriery is to create a foot that has approximate proportions or ground surface on either side of the
widest part of the foot. Note the branches of the shoe used to increase ground surface in the plantar section of the foot.