0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views8 pages

Tata Sons vs. Cyrus Mistry Case Summary

The document discusses the legal case between Tata Consultancy Services Limited and Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd., focusing on the removal of Cyrus Mistry as Executive Chairman of Tata Sons. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Tata Sons, stating that Mistry's dismissal did not constitute minority shareholder persecution or mismanagement. The court clarified that the Company Law Tribunal cannot intervene in such removals unless proven to be oppressive or harmful under the Companies Act, 2013.

Uploaded by

sssslideshare
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views8 pages

Tata Sons vs. Cyrus Mistry Case Summary

The document discusses the legal case between Tata Consultancy Services Limited and Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd., focusing on the removal of Cyrus Mistry as Executive Chairman of Tata Sons. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Tata Sons, stating that Mistry's dismissal did not constitute minority shareholder persecution or mismanagement. The court clarified that the Company Law Tribunal cannot intervene in such removals unless proven to be oppressive or harmful under the Companies Act, 2013.

Uploaded by

sssslideshare
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

[Link]

com/smg-vcjr-yym

[Link]
[Link]/smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
smg-vcjr-yym[Link]

Chacha
yym[Link]

Vidhayak Hain HumareChacha Vidhayak Hain


HumareChacha Vidhayak Hain HumareChacha
Vidhayak Hain Humarecom/smg-vcjr-yym[Link] Consultancy
Services Limited v. Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. Facts of the Case The Sapoorji Pallonji Group (SP
Group), led by Cyrus Mistry, owned 18.37 percent of Tata Sons Limited's total paid-up share
capital. Cyrus Mansportation Planning Point. Shipping Type. Route. Shipment Type. Shipping Type
Procedure Group. Shipment Cost Type. Item Category Shipment Cost. Item Determination Procedure
Group. Pricing Procedure for Shipment Cost. Process Configuration Part-I Step: 1 - Maintain Purchase
Organization SPRO - Enterprise Structure - Definition - Materials Management - Maintain Purchasing
Organization. Step: 2 - Create Purchasing Group TCode: OME4 SPRO - Materials Management -
Purchasing - Create Purchasing Group. Step: 3 - Maintain Transportation Planning Point to Company
Code. TCode: OVXT SPRO - Enterprise Structure - Definition - Logistics Execution - Maintain
Transportation Planning Point Step: 3A - Assign Transportation planning point to company code.
Step: 4 - Assign Purchasing Organizations to Company Code. TCode: OX01 SPRO - Enterprise
Structure - Assignment - Materials management - Assign ard of Directors issued a resolution
removing Cyrus from his role as Executive Chairman of the company." Cyrus was later dismissed
from the board of directors of Tata Industries Ltd., Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., and Tata
Teleservices Ltd., after separate shareholder votes. Following that, Cyrus resigned from a few
additional board positions. Following that, two SP Group firms, Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. and
Sterling Investment Corporation Pvt. Ltd., filed a company petition under Sections 241, 242, and
244 of the Companies Act, 2013, alleging mismanagement, oppression, and discrimination. The
complainants also questioned Tata Sons' shift from a public to a private company." The National
Company Law Tribunal ruled that Cyrus Mistry's dismissal as executive chairman was
unconstitutional and ordered that he be reinstated. The Supreme Court delayed the NCLAT order
in January 2020, and the verdict was postponed until December 17, 2020. The Supreme Court has
now ruled that Tata Sons' conduct did not amount to minority shareholder persecution or
mismanagement. Judgement:-The judgement went in the Tata Group's favour. The bench
dismissed all of Cyrus Mistry's allegations of persecution and mismanagement levelled against
Tata Sons Limited. A Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice S A Bobde, Justice V
Ramasubramanian, and Justice A S Bopanna made the judgement. On December 18, 2019, the
Supreme Court postponed the ruling of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) to
reinstate Cyrus Mistry as executive chairman of Tata Sons. The Supreme Court held that the
Company Law Tribunal cannot intervene in the removal of a person as a Chairman of a Company
in a petition filed under Section 241 of the Companies Act, 2013, unless the removal is oppressive,
mismanaged, or done in a prejudicial manner harming the company, its members, or the public at
large. The court decided that removing a person as Chairman of the Company is not a subject
matter under Section 241 of the Companies Act unless it is proven to be "oppressive or harmful."
Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act of 2013 do not specifically give reinstatement
authority, according to the court. As a result, on December 18, 2019, the Supreme Court
overturned the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal's (NCLAT) order to reinstate Cyrus
Mistry as executive chairman of Tata
[Link]/smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
yym[Link]
[Link]/smS4DK906584 ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 :

Sindhu:20241220g- Chacha Vidhayak Hain Humare vcjr-


yym[Link]
[Link]/smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
yym[Link]
[Link]/smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
yym[Link] ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : ansportation Planning Point. Shipping Type. Route. Shipment Type.
Shipping Type Procedure Group. Shipment Cost Type. Item Category Shipment Cost. Item
Determination Procedure Group. Pricing Procedure for Shipment Cost. Process Configuration Part-I
Step: 1 - Maintain Purchase Organization SPRO - Enterprise Structure - Definition - Materials
Management - Maintain Purchasing Organization. Step: 2 - Create Purchasing Group TCode: OME4
SPRO - Materials Management - Purchasing - Create Purchasing Group. Step: 3 - Maintain
Transportation Planning Point to Company Code. TCode: OVXT SPRO - Enterprise Structure -
Definition - Logistics Execution - Maintain Transportation Planning Point Step: 3A - Assign
Transportation planning point to company code. Step: 4 - Assign Purchasing Organizations to
Company Code. TCode: OX01 SPRO - Enterprise Structure - Assignment - Materials management -
Assign Purchasing Organization to Company Code. Step: 5 - Assign Purchasing Organizations

27983 Chacha .com/smg-vcjr-yym[Link]


[Link]/smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
yym[Link] ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORMansportation Planning Point. Shipping Type. Route. Shipment Type.
Shipping Type Procedure Group. Shipment Cost Type. Item Category Shipment Cost. Item
Determination Procedure Group. Pricing Procedure for Shipment Cost. Process Configuration Part-I
Step: 1 - Maintain Purchase Organization SPRO - Enterprise Structure - Definition - Materials
Management - Maintain Purchasing Organization. Step: 2 - Create Purchasing Group TCode: OME4
SPRO - Materials Management - Purchasing - Create Purchasing Group. Step: 3 - Maintain
Transportation Planning Point to Company Code. TCode: OVXT SPRO - Enterprise Structure -
Definition - Logistics Execution - Maintain Transportation Planning Point Step: 3A - Assign
Transportation planning point to company code. Step: 4 - Assign Purchasing Organizations to
Company Code. TCode: OX01 SPRO - Enterprise Structure - Assignment - Materials management -
Assign Purchasing Organization to Company Code. Step: 5 - Assign Purchasing Organizations :
27983 : Sindhu:20241220vvvvvvS4DK906584 ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 :
Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 :
Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 :
Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 :
Chacha Vidhayak Hain HumareChacha
Sindhu

Vidhayak Hain HumareChacha Vidhayak Hain


HumareChacha Vidhayak Hain HumareChacha
Vidhayak Hain Humare:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220m[Link]
yym[Link]
[Link]/Tata Consultancy Services Limited v. Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. Facts of the
Case The Sapoorji Pallonji Group (SP Group), led by Cyrus Mistry, owned 18.37 percent of Tata
ansportation Planning Point. Shipping Type. Route. Shipment Type. Shipping Type Procedure Group.
Shipment Cost Type. Item Category Shipment Cost. Item Determination Procedure Group. Pricing
Procedure for Shipment Cost. Process Configuration Part-I Step: 1 - Maintain Purchase Organization
SPRO - Enterprise Structure - Definition - Materials Management - Maintain Purchasing Organization.
Step: 2 - Create Purchasing Group TCode: OME4 SPRO - Materials Management - Purchasing - Create
Purchasing Group. Step: 3 - Maintain Transportation Planning Point to Company Code. TCode: OVXT
SPRO - Enterprise Structure - Definition - Logistics Execution - Maintain Transportation Planning
Point Step: 3A - Assign Transportation planning point to company code. Step: 4 - Assign Purchasing
Organizations to Company Code. TCode: OX01 SPRO - Enterprise Structure - Assignment - Materials
management - Assign Purchasing Organization to Company Code. Step: 5 - Assign Purchasing
Organizations Sons Limited's total paid-up share capital. Cyrus Mistry was named as the Tata
Sons' Executive Deputy Chairman for a five-year term in [Link] the end of the year, the Board of
Directors had named Cyrus as the Executive Chairman of Tata Sons, effective December 29, 2012,
while Ratan Tata was named Chairman Emeritus. On October 24, 2016, the Tata Sons Board of
Directors issued a resolution removing Cyrus from his role as Executive Chairman of the
company." Cyrus was later dismissed from the board of directors of Tata Industries Ltd., Tata
Consultancy Services Ltd., and Tata Teleservices Ltd., after separate shareholder votes.
Following that, Cyrus resigned from a few additional board positions. Following that, two SP
Group firms, Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. and Sterling Investment Corporation Pvt. Ltd., filed a
company petition under Sections 241, 242, and 244 of the Companies Act, 2013, alleging
mismanagement, oppression, and discrimination. The complainants also questioned Tata
Sansportation Planning Point. Shipping Type. Route. Shipment Type. Shipping Type Procedure
Group. Shipment Cost Type. Item Category Shipment Cost. Item Determination Procedure Group.
Pricing Procedure for Shipment Cost. Process Configuration Part-I Step: 1 - Maintain Purchase
Organization SPRO - Enterprise Structure - Definition - Materials Management - Maintain Purchasing
Organization. Step: 2 - Create Purchasing Group TCode: OME4 SPRO - Materials Management -
Purchasing - Create Purchasing Group. Step: 3 - Maintain Transportation Planning Point to Company
Code. TCode: OVXT SPRO - Enterprise Structure - Definition - Logistics chairman was
unconstitutional and ordered that he be reinstated. The Supreme Court delayed the NCLAT order
in January 2020, and the verdict was postponed until December 17, 2020. The Supreme Court has
now ruled that Tata Sons' conduct did not amount to minority shareholder persecution or
mismanagement. Judgement:-The judgement went in the Tata Group's favour. The bench
dismissed all of Cyrus Mistry's allegations of persecution and mismanagement levelled against
Tata Sons Limited. A Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice S A Bobde, Justice V
Ramasubramanian, and Justice A S Bopanna made the judgement. On December 18, 2019, the
Supreme Court postponed the ruling of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (at the
Company Law Tribunal cannot intervene in the removal of a person as a Chairman of a Company
in a petition filed under Section 241 of the Companies Act, 2013, unless the removal is oppressive,
mismanaged, or done in a prejudicial manner harming the company, its members, or the public at
large. The court decided that removing a person as Chairman of the Company is not a subject
matter under Section 241 of the Companies Act unless it is proven to be "oppressive or harmful."
Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act of 2013 do not specifically give reinstatement
authority, according to the court. As a result, on December 18, 2019, the Supreme Court
overturned the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal's (NCLAT) order to reinstate Cyrus
Mistry as executive chairman of Tata [Link]-vcjr-yym[Link]
yym[Link]
[Link] Planning Point. Shipping Type. Route. Shipment Type. Shipping Type Procedure
Group. Shipment Cost Type. Item Category Shipment Cost. Item Determination Procedure Group.
Pricing Procedure for Shipment Cost. Process Configuration Part-I Step: 1 - Maintain Purchase
Organization SPRO - Enterprise Structure - Definition - Materials Management - Maintain Purchasing
Organization. Step: 2 - Create Purchasing Group TCode: OME4 SPRO - Materials Management -
Purchasing - Create Purchasing Group. Step: 3 - Maintain Transportation Planning Point to Company
Code. TCode: OVXT SPRO - Enterprise Structure - Definition - Logistics Execution - Maintain
Transportation Planning Point Step: 3A - Assign Transportation planning point to company code.
Step: 4 - Assign Purchasing Organizations to Company Code. TCode: OX01 SPRO - Enterprise
Structure - Assignment - Materials management - Assign Purchasing Organization to Company Code.
Step: 5 - Assign Purchasing Organizations [Link]/smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
yym[Link]
[Link]/smg-vcjr-yym[Link]

Chacha Vidhayak Hain HumareChacha


smg-vcj

Vidhayak Hain Humarevvr-yym[Link]


yym[Link]
ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:2024S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:202412201220s://[Link]/smg-vcjr-
yym[Link]
[Link]/smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
yym[Link]
[Link]/smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
yym[Link]
[Link]/smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
yym[Link]
[Link]/smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
yym[Link]
[Link]/smg-vcjr-yymS4DK906584 ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 :

Chacha Vidhayak Hain HumareChacha


Sindhu:2024122

Vidhayak Hain HumareChacha Vidhayak Hain


HumareChacha Vidhayak Hain Humare0S4DK906584
ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220[Link]
yym[Link]
[Link]/smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
yym[Link]

[Link]/smg-vcjr-yym[Link] Chacha Vidhayak


Hain
Humareg-vcjr-yym[Link]
vcjr-yym[Link]
[Link]/smg-vcjr-yym[Link] ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK9S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Tata Consultancy Services Limited v. Cyrus Investments Pvt.
Ltd. Facts of the Case The Sapoorji Pallonji Group (SP Group), led by Cyrus Mistry, owned 18.37
percent of Tata Sons Limited's total paid-up share capital. Cyrus Mistry was named as the Tata
Sons' Executive Deputy Chairman for a five-year term in [Link] the end of the year, the Board of
Directors had named Cyrus as the Executive Chairman of Tata Sons, effective December 29, 2012,
while Ratan Tata was named Chairman Emeritus. On October 24, 2016, the Tata Sons Board of
Directors issued a resolution removing Cyrus from his role as Executive Chairman of the
company." Cyrus was later dismissed from the board of directors of Tata Industries Ltd., Tata
Consultancy Services Ltd., and Tata Teleservices Ltd., after separate shareholder votes.
Following that, Cyrus resigned from a few additional board positions. Following that, two SP
Group firms, Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. and Sterling Investment Corporation Pvt. Ltd., filed a
company petition under Sections 241, 242, and 244 of the Companies Act, 2013, alleging
mismanagement, oppression, and discrimination. The complainants also questioned Tata Sons'
shift from a public to a private company." The National Company Law Tribunal ruled that Cyrus
Mistry's dismissal as executive chairman was unconstitutional and ordered that he be reinstated.
The Supreme Court delayed the NCLAT order in January 2020, and the verdict was postponed
until December 17, 2020. The Supreme Court has now ruled that Tata Sons' conduct did not
amount to minority shareholder persecution or mismanagement. Judgement:-The judgement
went in the Tata Group's favour. The bench dismissed all of Cyrus Mistry's allegations of
persecution and mismanagement levelled against Tata Sons Limited. A Supreme Court bench led
by Chief Justice S A Bobde, Justice V Ramasubramanian, and Justice A S Bopanna made the
judgement. On December 18, 2019, the Supreme Court postponed the ruling of the National
Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) to reinstate Cyrus Mistry as executive chairman of Tata
Sons. The Supreme Court held that the Company Law Tribunal cannot intervene in the removal of
a person as a Chairman of a Company in a petition filed under Section 241 of the Companies Act,
2013, unless the removal is oppressive, mismanaged, or done in a prejudicial manner harming the
company, its members, or the public at large. The court decided that removing a person as
Chairman of the Company is not a subject matter under Section 241 of the Companies Act unless
it is proven to be "oppressive or harmful." Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act of 2013 do
not specifically give reinstatement authority, according to the court. As a result, on December 18,
2019, the Supreme Court overturned the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal's (NCLAT)
order to reinstate Cyrus Mistry as executive chairman of Tata [Link]:20241220S4DK906584
ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :

Chacha
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584

Vidhayak Hain HumareChacha Vidhayak Hain


HumareChacha Vidhayak Hain Humarev ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:2024122006584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 S4DK906584
ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM :
27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 :
Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 :
Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 :
Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 :
Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 :
Chacha Vidhayak Hain HumareChacha
Sind

Vidhayak Hain HumareChacha Vidhayak Hain


HumareChacha Vidhayak Hain
Humarehu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 :
Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 :
Sindhu:20241220mg-vcjr-yym[Link]
ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 :
Sindhu:[Link]/smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
[Link]/smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
yym[Link]
[Link]/smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
yym[Link] ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 :
Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 :
Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 :
Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 :
Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 :
Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 :
Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 :

Chacha Vidhayak Hain HumareChacha


Sindhu:2

Vidhayak Hain HumareChacha Vidhayak Hain


Humare0241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 :
Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 :
Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 :
Sindhu:20241220m/smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
yym[Link]
ABAP : SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220[Link]
yym[Link]
[Link]/smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
yym[Link]
[Link]/smg-vcjr-yym[Link] ABAP :
SD : ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :

Chacha Vidhayak Hain


ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:2024122

HumareChacha Vidhayak Hain HumareChacha


Vidhayak Hain Humare0S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220S4DK906584 ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220ttps://[Link]/smg-vcjr-
yym[Link]
[Link]/smg-vcjr-yym[Link]
smg-vcjr-yym[Link] ABAP : SD :
ZSD_DIST_INVOICE_FORM : 27983 : Sindhu:20241220

You might also like