Sewer Design for Irrigation Culverts
Sewer Design for Irrigation Culverts
1. SEWERS
1.1. INTRODUCTION
a) Aim.-
Culverts are intended to convey water from an irrigation canal or drain under a road
crossing or other channel or drain. They are ducts with a circular section or tubes (the
most used), or a frame (square or rectangular section). They can flow full or partially
full depending on certain factors such as: diameter, length, roughness and mainly the
water levels, both at the inlet and outlet.
To meet the objectives of crossing a road or canal, the culvert can be straight with a
single slope or it can have curves, both in the vertical and horizontal planes, and
sections with different slopes. In these notes, we will discuss straight sewers with a
single slope that are characterized by having a minimum internal hydrostatic pressure,
that is, the hydraulic gradient is above the top of the pipe and sometimes within the
pipe itself.
b) Advantages.-
Generally the available hydraulic head (H), flow rate (Q) and economic considerations
determine whether a culvert or bridge is used. For flows less than 3 m3/s a culvert is
generally cheaper than a bridge. In addition, the design and construction of a culvert is
simpler than that of a bridge. Installation is also quicker without much disruption to
traffic or irrigation.
For flow rates ranging between 0.5 m3/s and 2.2 m3/s
Qmax = 2 d2 (m3/s)
Length of transitions: Lt 5 d
The entrance and exit transitions have rockfill protection with a rock layer
thickness of 0.25 m up to a height above the channel bottom of 1.2 d.
Protection length at the entrance: Lp 4 d
Protection length at output: Lp 5 d
Minimum internal diameter: d = 0.51 m
For flow rates ranging between 1.5 m3/s and 4.5 m3/s
Eye section = width x height = dx 1.25 d
Maximum sewer capacity: Qmax = 3.1 d2 (m3/s)
Entrance and exit with rock protection and rock layer thickness of 0.25 m.
Length of transitions: Lt = d + b; where b = channel template
Protection length at the entrance: Lp = 3 d
Protection length at the output: Lp = 5 d
Minimum internal diameter: d = 0.80 m.
For flow rates ranging between 2.3 m3/s and 10.5 m3/s
Eye section = width x height = dx 1.25 d
Maximum sewer capacity: Qmax = 4.8 d2 (m3/s)
SEWER
m
Speed V =1.53
seg
Template b=1.25 m
Earring S=0.007
Slope m=1
The characteristics of the embankment are Elevation at the crown ¿ 27.470 msn m
Slope m=1.5
The width of the embankment, equal to 10 m, allows the transit of a H-20 type train.
A. Hydraulic design
1.52 2
Aminima =Q/V max =¿ =1.013 m
1.5
For a rectangular section, Aminima =a0 b0 wherea 0 is the width and b 0is the height. If we
do thisb 0=1.2 a0 it turns out that:
2
Aminima =1.2 a0
Then b 0=1.10 m
As mentioned above, for this type of flow, it is recommended that above the
culvert at the inlet there should be a velocity head equal to 1.5 V 21 /2 g and that the
slope of the culvert should be equal to or greater than 0.005, recommending that the
slope be equal to the channel as long as it is not less than this limit. With these
premises we will proceed to carry out the following calculations to determine the
available hydraulic load. H
Lt =
{[( ) ] }
b
2
+my −
a0
2
tang 12 °30 ´
Replacing values:
({[ 1.252 )+( 1) (.8)]− 1.02 } = 4.17 m, for design purposes we rounded the
Lt =
tang 12° 30 ´
length obtained Lt =¿4.2 m
= 25.90 masl
2 1/ 2
L=( l 0 ) /(1+ S0 )
WHERE
L = horizontal length
m= 1.5
L0=15.739
L = 15.738
Elev.C = Elev.B - S0 L
= 25.90- 0.007x15.74
= 25,789 masl
Considering that the slope of the drain cannot be modified, the location of
point D is determined based on the total L length, which includes that of the
transitions and the sewer, that is, L´ = 2 Lt L + = 2x4.2 + 15.74 = 24.14 m
Elev.D = 26.430-0.007x24.14
= 27.23 masl
At point D, the water depth will be equal to the depth at point A because the
flow, section and slope are the same at both points, therefore
= 26.261 +.80
= 27,061 masl
Q= A 0 C D ¿¿
3 3
m pies
WhereQ=1.524 : = 53.77
seg seg
2
A0 =1.15 m =12.37 pies2
❑
2 pies
G=9.81m/ seg = 32.174 2
seg
n=0.014
Replacing values
[ ]
1 /2
2 x 32.174( h1−h 4)
53.77=12.37 x .95 2 2 4 /3
1+ 29 x .95 x 0.014 x 51.62/.977 ❑
(0.169m ≥0.151m)
From the results, it can be deduced that the slope of the transition is correct as
it is less than required, (0.132<0.25, 0.118<0.25)
B. STRUCTURAL DESIGN
h1
hc t
h2
b 0 =1.15m Lb =1.3m
a 0=1.0 m
The =1.15
The box cross section is shown in the figure. For the structural design, a slab
thickness of t=15cm and a covering r=4cm are assumed.
γc=2400kg /c m2 and fy =4200kg /c m2. The critical design condition occurs when
the sewer is empty.
hc = elev.E-(elevB+b 0+ t ¿
= 27.740-(25.9+1.15+.15)
= 0.54m
σsi< σs
2
σ =2 kg /cm
σsi=σ r + σ e + σ a + σ t
σ r is pressure exerted by the fillingkg /m2σ r=γ s . hc=1800 x 0.54 , = 972 kg /m2
Ai =a 0 b 0 = 1.15 m2
Replacing values
The pressure exerted by traffic on the upper part of the sewer is transmitted by it to the
lower part. To calculate it we must take into account that:
a) If hc≥1 σ t=ΦP t
Pt = traffic load
Where
L = wheelbase = La = 1.15
For the calculation, the coverage height hc = 0.54m and the equation that is applied
is:
I = 14.97/(1.15+37.41) ≤ 0.30
Consequently:
σ t = 5246.1 kg /m2
Finally, the pressure exerted by the system on the stratum on which the sewer
rests is:
0.87kg /cm2 , Conclusion 0.87 <2. Therefore the structure will not fail due to settlement.
ωs = 5087 kg/m
The weight of the lower slab is not considered because it does not generate
moments.
ωi = 5807 kg/m
C a = 0.295
5087 kg/m
5807kg/m
In a built-in structural element the maximum moments occur at the extremities and their
mathematical expression, deduced from the previous equation, is:
Then, we proceed to calculate the maximum moments of the ends of the slab.
= -5807x1.152/12
=- 640 kg-m
In the side slab they are considered embedded at both ends with loads distributed in a
trapezoidal shape. With the previous equation, we obtain the formula that allows us to
calculate the moments at the ends, establishing that
( )
2
M 2=¿ 325.46 x 1.3 2
− −(687 x 1.3 /30)
12
= -84.53 kg-m
( )
2
M 3=¿ 325.46 x 1.3 2
− −(687 x 1.3 /20)
12
= 103.88 kg-m
With the calculated moments we build the diagram presented, observing that
the moments at its vertices are not balanced.
To balance the moments we use the Hardy Cross method and for which it is
necessary to know
K = stiffness coefficient
C = distribution coefficient = -k /Σ Kr
Distribution coefficient
C2 = -0.537
C2` =-0.463
C3 = -0.537
C3´ =-0.463
C4 = -0.537
C4`= -0.463
M x=¿ wx(l−x )/ 2¿
The maximum moment for a simply supported element occurs in the central part, i.e.:
2 3
M x =484 x−205 x −88.4 x
To locate the position of the maximum moment, we derive the previous expression with
respect to x and equal it to 0.
484-410x-256x2 = 0
X = .0783
M x = 211 kg-m
Using the general moment formulas, both for horizontal slabs and for lateral slabs, the
curves are graphed, locating the maximum moments obtained on them, thus obtaining
the ISOSTATIC MOMENT DIAGRAM
v x = w [(l/2)-x]
Calculations
−wsl
v 2= =−2925.02
2
When x = 0 v 2=429 kg
When x = L v 3=−723 kg
LINKOGRAPHY
[Link]
archivoz/curzoz/Tipeo_Drenaje_I_Parte.pdf