"The bystander effect"
If you witnessed an emergency happening right before your eyes, you would
certainly take some sort of action to help the person in trouble, right? While we might
all like to believe that this is true, psychologists suggest that whether or not you
intervene might depend upon the number of other witnesses present.
When an emergency situation occurs, the bystander effect holds that observers are
more likely to take action if there are few or no other witnesses.
Being part of a large crowd makes it so no single person has to take responsibility
for an action (or inaction).
The bystander effect is the theory that people are less likely to help someone in need
if others are present. This behavior can occur when groups of people witness crimes,
violence, or bullying.
One of the first studies about the bystander effect was done by Bibb Latane and John
Darley a few years after Genovese was murdered. Latane and Darley found that the
more bystanders there were in a situation, the less likely anyone was to offer help or call
emergency services.
Preventing the bystander effect
[Link] aware of discriminatory or emergency situations.
2. Assuming responsibility for taking action.
[Link] how best to intervene.
[Link] action.
(1968) the year was discovered
diffusion of responsibility and social influence. The perceived diffusion of responsibility
means that the more onlookers there are, the less personal responsibility individuals
will feel to take action.
Situational factors affecting bystander behavior include the presence of others, diffusion of
responsibility and the cost of helping.
Five Step Decision-Making Model
[Link] the Event.
Interpret the Event as a problem.
[Link] personal responsibility to intervene.
[Link] how you are going to intervene.
[Link] action to intervene.