DDDM Unit 2
DDDM Unit 2
Analytical strengths are that they are perfectionists. They want things done right and
they want them done right the first time. They’re neat and tidy individuals. Analyticals
are economical, and they are self-disciplined.
Analyticals weaknesses are that they can be moody, critical, and negative.
Analyticals can be indecisive and they over-analyze everything. Their perfectionism can
also manifest as a weakness at times, as they can be guilty of making their pursuit of
perfection stall completion.
2. Driver
Drivers are the dynamic and active personality type. They exude confidence and
naturally gravitate toward leadership positions. They move very quickly to action, but
they are not detail oriented. Drivers are great with the big picture—they’re visionaries
and they see how we’re going to get to where we need to go, but they’re not always great
at taking the interim steps needed to get there.
Drivers’ strengths are that they are very determined individuals. They are
independent and they are productive. Drivers get a lot of things done. They are
visionaries and they’re decisive. A driver would rather make a bad decision than no
decision. They just want that decision to be made.
On the weak side, the driver can be insensitive, unsympathetic, harsh, proud, and
sarcastic. Drivers do not like to admit when they are wrong. They can also rush to a
decision without thoroughly thinking through or understanding the results or
consequences of their decision.
3. Amiable
The amiable personality type is a very patient and well-balanced individual. They’re
quiet but witty. They’re very sympathetic, kind, and inoffensive—amiables do not like to
offend people.
An amiable is easy going and everybody likes the amiables. You know why? Because they
don’t like conflict so they’re very easy to get along with. They’re diplomatic and calm.
But on the weak side, amiables can be stubborn and selfish. Their aversion to offence
and conflict can also manifest as a weakness.
4. Expressive
We call the expressive the social specialist because they love to have fun. They are
individuals who turn disaster into humor, they prevent dull moments, and they are very
generous people. They want to be included. Expressives want to be included in projects.
They want to be included on teams. They want to be included in conversations.
Data analysts and data scientists represent two of the most in-demand, high-
paying jobs in 2021. The World Economic Forum Future of Jobs Report 2020
listed these roles at number one for increasing demand across industries,
followed immediately by AI and machine learning specialists and big data
specialists.
One of the biggest differences between data analysts and scientists is what they
do with data.
Data analysts typically work with structured data to solve tangible business
problems using tools like SQL, R or Python programming languages, data
visualization software, and statistical analysis. Common tasks for a data
analyst might include:
• Collaborating with organizational leaders to identify informational needs
• Acquiring data from primary and secondary sources
• Cleaning and reorganizing data for analysis
• Analyzing data sets to spot trends and patterns that can be translated into
actionable insights
• Presenting findings in an easy-to-understand way to inform data-driven
decisions
Data scientists often deal with the unknown by using more advanced data
techniques to make predictions about the future. They might automate their
own machine learning algorithms or design predictive modeling processes that
can handle both structured and unstructured data. This role is generally
considered a more advanced version of a data analyst. Some day-to-day tasks
might include:
• Gathering, cleaning, and processing raw data
Data analyst roles require at least a bachelor’s degree in a field like mathematics,
statistics, computer science, or finance.
Data scientists (as well as many advanced data analysts) typically have a master’s or
doctoral degree in data science, information technology, mathematics, or statistics.
Data scientists and data analysts both work with data, but each role uses a slightly
different set of skills and tools. Many skills involved in data science build off of those data
analysts use. Here’s a look at how they compare.
• Data mining: Data Analysts extract data from multiple sources that can be
primary or secondary. After that, they organize the data in a proper format that
can be easily understood.
• Maintaining databases: Data Analysts help design and maintain database
systems. This includes creating, updating, reading, and deleting a database.
• Data preparation: Data collected from multiple sources would always have
errors, redundancy, missing values, and many more, which means that the data is
in a raw format. After the extraction of the data, therefore, Data Analysts have to
In order for a company to get serious about working with data, a variety of roles can be
brought in to collect, organize, and analyze the data. Considering the large scope of this
process, taking the data from raw events all the way through actionable insights, there
can be some considerable confusion in what responsibilities each data role has.
Organizations that don’t have any experience with data may end up creating listings
where they attach responsibilities to a job title that are counter to general expectations.
Job hunters can also fall into the trap from the other direction, seeking opportunities
that they are not suited for or which will not match with their interests.
This article describes general guidelines for differentiating between three major data
roles that organizations hire for their data teams: data engineers, data analysts, and data
scientists. While these aren’t the only “data” roles out there, these three are the most
prominent, and the focus of most questions about distinguishing roles in data.
Data Engineer
Traditionally, data engineers have been the number one hire for a company to start
seriously working with data. It doesn’t really make sense to think about how to perform
data analysis until you actually have data to analyze. A data engineer is responsible for
figuring out how to gather data, organize it, and maintain it, so they are a vital role to
have on a data team.
In a smaller organization, however, having a data engineer might not be as high priority.
Over the past few years, data collection products like Stitch and Blendo have been
developed to help manage the extraction of data from common data sources in processes
also known as ETL and ELT. Cloud-based data storage solutions like Amazon Redshift
and Google BigQuery can flexibly manage the manipulation of large amounts of data. It
is not inconceivable that a data analyst or scientist can address an organization’s data
needs without a data engineer by setting up and leveraging these tools.
Data Architect
As a final note, the role of data engineer has a fair overlap with that of a data architect,
often the fourth “data” role added to the three focused on in this article. A data architect
shares a lot of the same knowledge as the data engineer in knowing how data can be
extracted from data sources, how data should be transformed into useful forms, and
how cleaned data can be stored. However, one general distinction that is made between
the two roles is that a data architect has responsibility for planning the architecture or
framework in which the data will be processed and stored. The architect dictates the
ways in which data should be collected, stored, and made available to users at a high
level, while anticipating and adapting to the changing needs of those users. The data
engineer, then, will be responsible for implementation and maintenance of the data
pipeline following the architect’s plan. The duties of the data architect may sometimes
fall to a senior data engineer, or be a step in a data engineer’s career path.
Data Analyst
One way that you can think about the distinction in data roles is whether they act before
the data is collected or after the data is collected. Data engineers and data architects are
responsible for operations before the data is collected, while data analysts and data
scientists are responsible for operations after the data is collected. Just as there can be
some confusion between the roles of data engineer and data architect, there also exists
confusion between the roles of data analyst and data scientist.
For a company that is just starting out, the most likely case is that they will want a data
analyst. (Discussion and contrast to the data scientist will follow in the next section.)
While there is a broad range of responsibilities that a data analyst might have depending
on the company, a good rule of thumb is to think of data analysts as explorers. A top
data analyst will have the curiosity and skills to investigate the data from multiple
Data analysts are well-served not just by the ability to mine through data, but also be
able to report their findings to others. An analyst should be able to create visualizations
or use tools to create dashboards that convey to others what they have found.
Visualizations and dashboards should not only be for members of a data team to
understand the data, they’re also for demonstrating findings to others outside of the
team. A good data analyst or data scientist should know how to polish their exploratory
visualization work into explanatory visualizations that effectively communicate findings.
Business Analyst
One data role that data analysts may cross over into is that of a business analyst. When a
data analyst performs their explorations and creates their reports, they may not
necessarily be required to interpret their findings in terms of company actions. On the
other hand, a business analyst will be primarily focused on their use of data to answer
business questions and suggest future actions to take. In a way, a business analyst might
be considered as a data analyst that acts in a specialized domain. Although the data
analyst might make use of domain knowledge and business ideas to guide their
exploration, they will be more concerned that trends and patterns in the data are
identified than collaborating with others to enact strategies based off those findings.
Data Scientist
One rule of thumb that is often put forth considers data analysts and data scientists to
be in the same general domain – gathering insights from data – but that the data analyst
is basically a junior role to the data scientist. This isn’t exactly wrong, but there’s
definitely more nuance to the two roles than just that.
One distinction promoted by Google’s Cassie Korzykov is that data analysts’ work is all
about stating what the data tells you, and about reporting facts rather than
uncertainties. Coming up with a conclusion should not be the job of an analyst’s report –
that’s the job of statistics and a data scientist. Data analysts tend to develop
performance metrics, report what is there, and convey those observations to others,
while data scientists are geared towards making sure those observations actually carry
statistical significance.
A data scientist should be able to sift through data in the same way as an analyst, but
also be able to apply statistical techniques in order to differentiate between signal and
noise. Lead data scientists especially need the ability to make decisions about which
observations from a data analyst are worth following up on. They should understand
what questions are worth investigating and how to answer those questions with further
data gathering and running experiments. Understanding of how to create balanced
experiment designs and anticipating common design issues is an important skill for
moving beyond correlational observations to understanding of causal effects. Because of
For a small company, a data scientist might need to be an expert in all of the aspects of
the role outlined above. But not all data scientists need to be responsible for all of these
points; as a company gets larger, there may be distinctions made between senior and
junior data scientist roles at a company. In addition, explicitly specialist roles of
statistician and machine learning engineer can also stand as part of a data team
alongside a data scientist.
Beyond this, data is logical and concrete in a way that gut instinct and intuition simply
aren’t. By removing the subjective elements from your business decisions, you can instill
confidence in yourself and your company as a whole. This confidence allows your
organization to commit fully to a particular vision or strategy without being overly
concerned that the wrong decision has been made.
Just because a decision is based on data doesn’t mean it will always be correct. While
the data might show a particular pattern or suggest a certain outcome, if the data
collection process or interpretation is flawed, then any decision based on the data would
be inaccurate. This is why the impact of every business decision should be regularly
measured and monitored.
While this is valuable in its own right, it’s not the only role that data and analysis can
play within your business. Given enough practice and the right types and quantities of
data, it’s possible to leverage it in a more proactive way—for example, by identifying
business opportunities before your competition does, or by detecting threats before they
grow too serious.
One of the most impactful initiatives, according to the survey, is using data to decrease
expenses. Of the organizations which began projects designed to decrease expenses,
more than 49 percent have seen value from their projects. Other initiatives have shown
more mixed results.
“Big data is already being used to improve operational efficiency,” said Randy Bean,
CEO and managing partner of consultancy firm NewVantage Partners, when
announcing the results of the survey. “And the ability to make informed decisions based
on the very latest up-to-the-moment information is rapidly becoming the mainstream
norm.”
FEED BACK: [email protected]
How to Make Data-Driven Decisions
A well-rounded data analyst knows the business well and posses sharp organizational
acumen. Ask yourself what the problems are in your given industry and competitive
market. Identify and understand them thoroughly. Establishing this foundational
knowledge will equip you to make better inferences with your data later on.
Before you begin collecting data, you should start by identifying the business questions
that you want to answer to achieve your organizational goals. By determining the precise
questions you need to know to inform your strategy, you’ll be able to streamline the data
collection process and avoid wasting resources.
Coordinating your various sources seems simple, but finding common variables among
each dataset can present a tremendously difficult problem. It can be easy to settle for the
immediate goal of utilizing the data for your current purpose alone, but it’s wise to
determine whether or not this data could also be used for additional projects in the
future. If so, you should strive to develop a strategy to present the data in a way that’s
accessible in other scenarios as well.
The term “data cleaning” refers to the process of preparing raw data for analysis by
removing or correcting data that is incorrect, incomplete, or irrelevant. To do so, start
by building tables to organize and catalog what you’ve found. Create a data dictionary—a
table that catalogs each of your variables and translates them into what they mean to
you in the context of this particular project. This information could include data type
and other processing factors, as well.
Once you’ve thoroughly cleaned the data, you can begin to analyze the information using
statistical models. At this stage, you will start to build models to test your data and
answer the business questions you identified earlier in the process. Testing different
models such as linear regressions, decision trees, random forest modeling, and others
can help you determine which method is best suited to your data set.
Here, you will also need to decide how to present the information in order to answer the
question at hand. There are three different ways to demonstrate your findings:
Inferential Information: The facts, plus an interpretation of what those facts indicate in
the context of a particular project.
Predictive Information: An inference based upon facts and advice for further action
based on your reasoning.
Clarifying how the information will be most effectively presented will help you remain
organized when it comes time to interpret the data.
The last step in data-driven decision making is coming to a conclusion. Ask yourself,
“What new information did you learn from the collection of statistics?” Despite pressure
to discover something entirely new, a great place to start is by asking yourself questions
to which you already know—or think you know—the answer.
Many companies make frequent assumptions about their products or market. For
example, they might believe, “A market for this product exists,” or, “This is what our
customers want.” But before seeking out new information, first put existing assumptions
to the test. Proving these assumptions are correct will give you a foundation to work
from. Alternatively, disproving these assumptions will allow you to eliminate any false
claims that have, perhaps unknowingly, been negatively impacting your company. Keep
in mind that an exceptional data-driven decision usually generates more questions than
answers.
The conclusions drawn from your analysis will ultimately help your organization make
more informed decisions and drive strategy moving forward. It is important to
remember, though, that these findings can be virtually useless if they are not presented
effectively. Thus, data analysts must become skilled in the art of data storytelling to
communicate their findings with key stakeholders as effectively as possible.
To get teams collaborating effectively, you need to establish some trust, which usually
isn’t present at the get-go. Initially, there can be a lack of trust between cross functional
teams, seeing as you may not work with this group of people often, nor have a real
understanding of their experience or quality of work. When there is a lack of trust
between the different teams, collaboration inevitably fails.
Leaders should try to align the common goal of the organization as a whole, rather than
suboptimizing their own departments goals. Start with some small opportunities to
work together to build some trust before you embark on larger projects. Finally,
consider planning a couple of meeting icebreakers and team building activities to
encourage your teammates to get to know each other.
Poor communication
It’s not easy communicating with our own teams let alone with other departments that
we’re not used to working with. Departments tend to operate as silos, often using their
own unique communication amongst team members only. But effective collaboration
Try using a universal communication approach that all employees are aware of and feel
comfortable with. Promote open and honest communication amongst team leaders and
managers.
Typically, we measure employee success based on goals and objectives that are specific
to job description and responsibilities. While there’s nothing wrong with setting up
personal goals, sometimes the focus becomes prioritizing tasks that help individuals
work towards personal goals, losing sight of the bigger picture. There becomes little
room for improvements and initiatives that will benefit the company as a whole.
If you want to improve cross functional collaboration, you need to devote specific time
to working with other departments and reward the successes on cross functional
projects accordingly. Make it clear that working towards cross functional goals doesn’t
take away from personal development but actually enhances it!
Finally, make sure to spend some time aligning on goals and the vision for the project.
For instance, if two teams are collaborating on an initiative, both team leads could meet
separately to talk about their vision and strategy to accomplish the cross-functional
team’s goals.
Cross functional collaboration challenges intensify when there are more people to
manage and communicate with. More people means that there may be more dominant
personalities that are more difficult to manage, especially if a specific leadership role
isn’t identified. Sometimes this can cause a scenario where different individuals
compete to be seen as the leader. In this case, it’s important to clearly define roles before
you begin working with other groups or departments for successful collaborative efforts
to be seen.
We speak to many people who are working to foster a continuous improvement mindset
within their organization. One of the biggest challenges that they report is improving
cross functional collaboration, which is an essential element of a culture of
improvement. Let’s look at a few of the barriers to cross functional collaboration and
Department managers and employees are usually measured against goals and objectives
that are specific to their function and role. This makes sense, but can lead to
suboptimizing, where each team prioritizes activities that will further successful
completion of their own local goals, leaving little room for projects or improvements
that will benefit other teams or the organization as a whole.
Solution: Organizations that are serious about improvement must make room in
the reward structure for collaborative activities. This may mean rewarding success on
cross functional projects separately, or allowing for time and energy devoted to such
efforts within the framework of the departmental goals. Sometimes, this means allowing
one department to go over budget for labor when that reduces overall labor expense for
the entire value stream. Additionally, employees should have a clear understanding of
how their work on collaborative assignments will be recognized, and be certain that such
efforts won’t hinder their achievement of departmental objectives.
Solution: The first step is to establish a common language around the entire
organization’s improvement efforts. Adopting a business management methodology
like Six Sigma or Lean can help because these approaches come with a shared
vocabulary, but the same can be achieved without them.
Barrier 3 – Mistrust
The, “If you want something done right, you have to do it yourself,” attitude is the
Kryptonite of cross-functional collaboration. Mistrust and competition between
Solution: Trust is earned through keeping promises and delivering quality results. If
mistrust is a barrier to collaboration in your organization, it makes sense to start with a
few small opportunities for teams to work together to get a quick wins. Seeing results
can help develop trust. Establishing SLAs (Service Level Agreements) between
departments can also be an effective method of building confidence.
It is not uncommon for different departments to have different technologies that drive
their everyday work. Sales reps, for example, may rely on the CRM to track activities,
while the development team uses an entirely different ticketing system. While it makes
sense for each department to use the best-of-breed automation for their core function,
this can hinder cross functional improvement activities.
Here are six steps organizations can take to begin deriving value from a data analytics
program:
With analytics outsourcing, one of the biggest cons is relinquishing a certain amount of
control. Carefully review your contract and make sure it clarifies who owns the logic or
algorithm, and upon exit, who owns the data, models, approaches, framework, and
configuration. Another major concern is data security, and along with that comes issues
surrounding data governance, intellectual property (IP), ownership, liability, and more.
The trend towards the creation of a chief data officer is increasing. This could be
incredibly beneficial; one person to head your data collection and analytics department
and digital strategy would be a crucial component to the growth and long-term success
of your company.
This requires an end-to-end strategy that includes data management and use of
analytics. Gone are the days of tossing large amounts of data into data lakes without first
applying data catalogs and metadata tagging processes. The evolution of data
management has even spawned a new practice—DataOps.
As data science platforms gain momentum, analytics teams are turning to these open
source and commercial tools to support a broad range of uses at scale. Capabilities range
from advanced data mining, preparation, and visualization to machine learning to build
and deploy predictive data flows. Consider analytics platforms that offer an intuitive
user experience so that a variety of stakeholders can access data, which can help connect
the entire workforce and makes for a more unified organization.
For example, Mission Data created a data analytics platform for The Atlantic to measure
key performance indicators for its digital readership. Instead of using a convoluted
spreadsheet, The Atlantic’s editorial, advertising, and product teams were given access
to real-time data and predictive analytics, allowing them to better measure article
performance and respond to changes immediately. The publisher’s operations team can
now track their target audience and derive value from the data as they continue their
growth as the third-longest-running magazine in America.