Bintara Internasional
Bintara Internasional
The Effect
*
of Working Capital, Liquidity and Leverage on Profitability
Rista Bintara
Accounting Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Mercu Buana University Jl. Raya Meruya Selatan Kembangan 11650 West Jakarta
Indonesia
Abstract
This research was conducted with the aim of: 1) To analyze the effect of working capital turnover on profitability; 2) To
analyze the effect of liquidity on profitability; 3) To analyze the effect of leverage on profitability. This type of research
used in this study is casual associative research (causal associative research). The population of this research are
property, real estate, and building construction companies which are included in the Kompas 100 index which are listed
on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in the period 2013-2018. The sampling technique is using purposive sampling
technique. The analytical method used to test hypotheses is multiple regression analysis. The results of the study show
that: 1) Working capital turnover has no effect on profitability; 2) Liquidity has no effect on profitability; and 3)
Leverage has a negative effect on profitability.
Keywords: Working Capital Turnover, Liquidity, Leverage, Profitability.
Copyright @ 2020: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license which permits unrestricted
use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use (NonCommercial, or CC-BY-NC) provided the original author and source
are credited.
© 2020 |Published by Scholars Middle East Publishers, Dubai, United Arab Emirates 29
Rista Bintara., Saudi J Econ Fin, Jan 2020; 4(1): 28-35
© 2020 |Published by Scholars Middle East Publishers, Dubai, United Arab Emirates 30
Rista Bintara., Saudi J Econ Fin, Jan 2020; 4(1): 28-35
Fig-1.1: Framework
Data Types and Sources selection of samples on the basis of the suitability of the
The data used in conducting this research is characteristics of the sample with the specified sample
secondary data, that is data obtained through selection criteria. The sample criteria used in this study
intermediaries from both parties and certain media that are:
support this research. The data used in this study are Property, real estate, and building construction
secondary data in the form of financial statements of companies which are included in the Kompas 100
property companies, real estate, and building index which are listed on the Indonesia Stock
construction which are included in the Kompas 100 Exchange (IDX) during 2013-2018.
index listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during Publish audited financial statements for the period
2013-2018 obtained from the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2013-2018
website (www.idx.co.id) and the official website of The company did not experience a loss during the
each of these companies. study year.
Data owned by the company are complete and in
Population and Research Samples accordance with the variables studied.
The population in this study are property, real
estate, and building construction companies which are According to the criteria above, the number of
included in the Kompas 100 index which are listed on samples used were 13 companies during the 6 periods
the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during 2013-2018. namely 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2018. Then the
The sample is part of the population used to estimate number of samples obtained was 13 companies x 6
population characteristics. The sampling technique is periods = 78 data to be used in this study.
using purposive sampling technique. According to
Widyani [11] the purposive sampling method is the
© 2020 |Published by Scholars Middle East Publishers, Dubai, United Arab Emirates 31
Rista Bintara., Saudi J Econ Fin, Jan 2020; 4(1): 28-35
Classic assumption test In this study, the significance level (α) of 0.05
This research was conducted with a simple or 5% was used. To test whether the proposed
regression analysis. The use of simple regression hypothesis is accepted or rejected, a test of research
analysis must be free from testing classic assumptions. variables is carried out by simultaneously testing
For this reason, before a simple regression analysis is through the simultaneous significance test (F statistic
carried out, classical assumptions must be tested first. test), which intends to explain the effect of the
Testing classic assumptions is done using the normality independent variable on the dependent variable.
test, multicollinearity test, heterokedasticity test and Meanwhile, to test each variable partially, it is carried
autocorrelation test. out by means of an individual parameter significance
test (statistical t test) which aims to find out whether the
Hypothesis testing independent variable influences the dependent variable,
In this study the authors used three and which of the dominant variables influence the
independent variables and three dependent variables. dependent variable.
The analytical method used to test the hypothesis is the
multiple regression method, namely regression used to RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
find out how much influence the independent variable Research Data Description
has on the dependent variable, with a simple linear The following are descriptive statistical results
regression analysis that aims to meet the researchers' about the research variables as follows:
The following are descriptive statistical results Sutera Realty Tbk. in 2018. up to the highest value of
about the research variables as follows: Working 7.76%, namely Bekasi Fajar Industrial Estate company
Capital Turnover Variables have an average value of in 2018. Variable Leverage has an average value of
0.05 times with a standard deviation of 0.086 times, 1.63% with a standard deviation of 1.212%, which
which means large data variations (more than 0.038 means small data variations (less than 0.416% from
times the mean). Working Capital Turnover Variables mean). The Leverage variable ranges from the lowest
range from the lowest value of -0.22 times, namely the value of 0.28%, namely the Adhi Karya (Persero) Tbk
company Alam Sutera Realty Tbk in 2016. up to the company in 2014. to the highest value of 5.37%, the
highest value of 0.40 times the company Alam Sutera Bekasi Fajar Industrial Estate company in 2014. The
Realty Tbk in 2014. Liquidity variables have an average profitability variable measured by ROA has an average
value of 2, 06% with a standard deviation of 1.380%, value of an average of 0.06% with a standard deviation
which means that the data variation is small (less than of 0.038%, which means that the variation of the data is
0.678% of the mean). Liquidity variable ranges from small (less than 0.018% of the mean). The profitability
the lowest value of 0.65%, namely the company Alam variable measured by ROA ranges from the lowest
© 2020 |Published by Scholars Middle East Publishers, Dubai, United Arab Emirates 32
Rista Bintara., Saudi J Econ Fin, Jan 2020; 4(1): 28-35
value of 0.00%, namely the Sentul City Tbk company Test Prerequisite Analysis
in 2014 to the highest value of 0.22%, the Bekasi Fajar Normality test
Industrial Estate company in 2013. Thus the overall results of the normality test
calculation using the Lilliefors test can be seen in the
summary in table 1.3 below:
Table-1.3: Summary of the Normality Test
L Tabel
No Estimation n Lcount Decision
α = 0.05 α = 0.01
1 Y atas X1 78 -0,0247 0,1003 0,1167 Normal
2 Y atas X2 78 -0,0294 0,1003 0,1167 Normal
3 Y atas X3 78 -0,0748 0,1003 0,1167 Normal
Source: Data processed (2019)
© 2020 |Published by Scholars Middle East Publishers, Dubai, United Arab Emirates 33
Rista Bintara., Saudi J Econ Fin, Jan 2020; 4(1): 28-35
Based on the results of the regression tests states that working capital turnover has no effect on
above, an equation can be formed as follows: Y = 0,080 profitability. But contrary to research conducted by
+ 0,064X1 - 0,003X2 - 0,013X3 + Ɛ1 Yulianita and Isynuwardhana [17] which states that
working capital turnover affects profitability.
Determination Coefficient Test (R2)
From table 1.7 it is known that the adjusted R Based on the data obtained shows that during
square value is 0.121. This means that 12.1% of the 2013-2018 the level of working capital turnover in the
profitability variable measured by ROA can be sample companies experienced an unstable increase and
explained by the variation of the independent variables decrease. This is due to the increase and decrease in
namely Working Capital Turnover, Liquidity and profitability not only reflected in working capital
Leverage, the remaining 76.1% (100% - 23.9%) is turnover, but there are other factors that affect
explained by other causes outside the model. profitability. This can be seen from the data that has
been processed which shows that information about the
Simultaneous Significance Test (Statistical Test F) increase or decrease in working capital turnover is not
From the Anova test or the F test in table 1.7 always followed by an increase and decrease in
above, the calculated F value is 4.542 with a profitability in the sample companies.
significance probability that indicates 0.006. Test
probability values are much smaller than α = 0.05. This Liquidity affects profitability
shows that together (simultaneously) Profitability Based on partial research results, it can be seen
variables measured by ROA can be explained by that liquidity has no effect on profitability. These results
variations in independent variables namely Working indicate that any increase in variable liquidity cannot
Capital Turnover, Liquidity and Leverage. increase profitability. This means that the high or low
ability of companies to pay short-term obligations does
Significance Test of Individual Parameters (t Test) not affect the size of the profits received by the
T test is performed to determine whether the company. Cash and inventory turnover owned by the
independent variables in the regression model have an company from its working capital is used to pay short-
individual effect on the dependent variable. To term obligations with no effect on corporate profits.
determine whether a hypothesis is accepted or rejected
is to compare t arithmetic with ttable and the The results of this study are in line with
significance value in this study using a significance research conducted by Yulianita and Isynuwardhana
level of 0.05. In this case, the table value is 1.665. [17] which states that liquidity has no effect on
profitability. But contrary to research conducted by
Partial test results (t test) in table 1.7 above Wijaya and Isnani [16] which states that liquidity
indicate that the variable working capital turnover does affects profitability.
not affect profitability, which can be seen from the
comparison between ttable and tcount, namely ttable> tcount, Leverage affects profitability
with a value of ttable 1.665 and tcount 1.348 and a Based on partial research results, it can be seen
significance level that is located above 0.05. Thus Ha 1 that leverage has a negative effect on profitability.
was rejected. These results indicate that any increase in leverage can
reduce profitability. Companies that have high DER
Liquidity variable does not affect profitability, tend to have low ROA. Conversely companies that have
which can be seen from the comparison between ttable a low DER tend to have high ROA. DER illustrates the
and tcount, namely ttable> thitung, with a value of ttable 1.665 extent to which owner's capital can cover debts to
and tcount -0.971 and a significance level above 0.05. outside parties [19]. The smaller the DER, the better.
Thus Ha2 rejected. For the security of outsiders the best ratio if capital is
greater than the amount of debt or at least the same. A
The leverage variable has a negative effect on high DER value influences ROA acquisition, which
profitability, which can be seen from the comparison causes the acquisition of a company's ROA value to be
between ttable and tcount, namely ttable <tcount, with a ttable low. This is due to the payment of fees incurred by a
value of 1.665 and tcount -3.469 and a significance level higher debt or loan. Declining corporate profits cause
below 0.05. Thus Ha3 received. the value of ROA to be low.
© 2020 |Published by Scholars Middle East Publishers, Dubai, United Arab Emirates 34
Rista Bintara., Saudi J Econ Fin, Jan 2020; 4(1): 28-35
conclusions can be drawn: 1) Working capital turnover Resepsi Estetis HB Jassin terhadap Al-
has no effect on profitability; 2) Liquidity has no effect Qur’an. Journal of Qur'an and Hadith
on profitability; and 3) Leverage has a negative effect Studies, 4(1), 37-55.
on profitability. 10. Irham Fahmi. (2014). Dalam Pengantar
Manajemen Keuangan. Bandung: Alfabeta
SUGGESTIONS 11. Munawir, S. (2010). Analisa Laporan Keuangan
By considering the existing limitations, it is (edisi keempat). Yogyakarta: Liberty
expected that future research will improve the following 12. Rista Bintara dan Putri Renalita Sutra Tanjung.
factors: 1) For companies, corporate financial managers (2019). Analysis of Fundamental Factors on Stock
must consider and consider the effect of liquidity on Return. International Journal of Academic
profitability in companies where the low cash owned by Research in Accounting, Finance and
the company must be used sufficiently for the purposes Management Sciences, 9(2).
and company investment, so that the profits obtained by 13. Dari, W., Harnovinsah. (2017). Pengaruh Resiko
the company increase .. 2) For investors, in determining Kredit (Non Performing Loan),Tingkat Kecukupan
the financial strategy can consider the funding decision Modal (Capital Adequacy Ratio), dan Loan to
factors relating to the portion of debt. Investors should Deposit Ratio terhadap Tingkat Profitabilitas
be careful about investing in companies with high debt pada Perusahaan Perbankan yang terdaftar di
structures because they have a high risk of bankruptcy. BEI Periode 2012-2015. Profita, 10(3).
Investors are advised to choose to invest in large 14. Indracahya, E., & Faisol, D.A. (2017). The Effect
companies that are more established in terms of total of Good Corporate Governance Elements,
assets and companies that have a good level of Leverage, Firm Age, Company Size and
profitability. 3) For further researchers, it is expected to Profitability on Earning Management (Empirical
conduct further research using different company Study of Manufacturing Companies in Bei 2014–
financial ratios, which have not been included in the 2016). Profita. 10(2).
model this research or by adding other independent 15. Panji Putranto. (2019). Pengaruh Strategi
variables that are thought to influence profitability. Diversifikasi, Leverage, dan Inflasi Terhadap
Profitabilitas Perusahaan Food & Beverage.
REFERENCES Jurnal online insan akuntan. 4(2) Desember
1. Kasmir. (2013). Analisis Laporan Keuangan. 16. Indra Wijaya dan Nurlaila Isnani. (2019).
Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. Pengaruh Efisiensi Modal Kerja, Likuditas, dan
2. Agus Riyanto. (2013). Kapita Selekta Kuesioner Solvabilitas terhadap Profitabilitas Perusahaan
Pengetahuan dan Sikap Dalam. Penelitian Farmasi. Jurnal online insan akuntan 4(2)
Kesehatan. Jakarta: Salemba Medika Desember
3. Nugroho, A., Visser, J., & Kuipers, T. (2011, 17. Fitri Ayu Yulianita dan Deannes Isynuwardhana.
May). An empirical model of technical debt and (2019). Pengaruh Perputaran Modal Kerja,
interest. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Likuiditas, dan Leverage Terhadap Profitabilitas
Managing Technical Debt (pp. 1-8). ACM. (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Barang
4. Bambang R. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Perbelanjaan Konsumsi yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia
Perusahaan. Edisi Keempat. Yogyakarta: BPFE Periode 2015-2017). E-Proceeding of
5. Satriya, I. M. D., & Lestari, P. V. (2014). Management, 6(2). Agustus
Pengaruh Perputaran Modal Kerja Terhadap 18. Aditya Mahendra Putra, Irene Rini Demi
Profitabilitas Perusahaan. E-Jurnal Pangestuti. (2019). Pengaruh Struktur Pasar,
Manajemen, 3(7). Kompetisi, Diversifikasi, dan Risiko Kredit
6. Riana, D., & Diyani, L. A. (2016). Pengaruh Rasio Terhadap Profitabilitas Bank Dengan Bank Size
Keuangan dalam Memprediksi Perubahan Laba Sebagai Variabel Kontrol (Studi Pada Bank Yang
pada Industri Farmasi (Studi Kasus pada BEI Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Diponegoro
Tahun 2011–2014). Jurnal Online Insan journal of management, 8(1).
Akuntan, 1(1), 16-42. 19. Harahap, E., Sakamoto, W., Nishi, H.(2010).
7. Dobrow Riza, S., Ganzach, Y., & Liu, Y. (2018). Failure prediction method for network
Time and job satisfaction: A longitudinal study of management system by using Bayesian network
the differential roles of age and tenure. Journal of and shared database. In8th Asia-Pacific
Management, 44(7), 2558-2579. Symposium on Information and
8. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory Telecommunication Technologies, 1-6
of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and 20. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2007). Standar
ownership structure. Journal of financial Akuntansi Keuangan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat
economics, 3(4), 305-360. www.idx.co.id
9. Lukman, F. (2015). Epistemologi Intuitif dalam
© 2020 |Published by Scholars Middle East Publishers, Dubai, United Arab Emirates 35