Research Title:
EXPLORING THE LIVE EXPERIENCES OF STUDENTS RAISED BY
GRANDPARENTS
CHAPTER 2
METHOD
This study employs a phenomenological qualitative research approach. It aims to
explore the lived experiences of students who have been raised by their grandparents.
Within this chapter, details are provided regarding the research design, criteria for
selecting respondents, methodologies for data collection, the roles undertaken by the
researchers, strategies for data analysis and interpretation, trustworthiness of the study,
and the ethical considerations essential for maintaining credibility.
Research Design
This study is phenomenological qualitative in design for it documented the
students’ academic struggles, support systems, and coping mechanisms while living
with their grandparents. What contributed to the deeper understanding of the lived
experience is the findings of the phenomenological research, which described the
structure of the experience in a comprehensive perspective. This methodology
described the relationship between a person and their surroundings as well as the
interconnectedness of the lived experiences, which is most suitable for the exploratory
study on the experiences of the students living with their grandparents.
The purpose of this phenomenological approach is to dig into the perception of
the students about how they see and react to phenomena they experienced. So that, it
agrees to the idea of Valde-Mamales, G.L.C., Daclan, G.S.T., & Gempes, G.P. (2016)
that this approach is highly relevant to understanding the struggles and success of
students from fosters homes, particularly those from grandparents. In layman’s term,
this approach documents in depth information and perceptions thru qualitative methods
like focused discussion, participative observation, and interviews and representing it
from the point of view of the respondents.
Phenomenology can be understood on how a certain event or experience is
perceived by consciousness and emotion leading to reactions, idea, understanding, and
concepting judgment. The participants in the study will be asked open-ended interview
questions, such that their specific experiences can be identified (Creswell, 2013; Adams
et al., 2007; Hancock, Ockleford & Windridge, 2007; Creswell, Plano & Vicki, 2002).
In phenomenological study, the purpose of interviews is to make access to
participant life experience. In conducting interview, the researcher will listen to learn
from the participant who has the expertise of his own experience. In this view point,
there is an interesting conversation between the participants and the interviewer leading
in the discussion of a particular experience the participants willing to share (Adams et
al, 2007; Neuman, 2006; DeMarrais & Lapan, 2004).
Data Collection
The employment of Focus Group Discussions (FGD) and In-depth Interviews
(IDI) as the primary data collection methods for this study has helped to do the
documentation properly, avoiding interpretation and analysis barriers.
Prior to data collection, permissions were obtained from both school authorities
and student respondents. Ethical validation of interview questions was conducted by
the office of the Principal and the subject teacher to ensure appropriateness and
comprehensibility. Participants were selected based on specific criteria, and informed
consent was secured before data collection. FGDs facilitated group interactions to
explore shared experiences, while in-depth interviews provided a platform for individual
narratives. Creswell (2008) emphasized that phenomenological study involves the
widest array of data collection as the researcher attempts to build an in-depth picture of
the case. Data collection procedures prioritized confidentiality and participant comfort,
with audio recordings and detailed notes taken during sessions. Thematic analysis was
employed to identify recurring themes and patterns, while ethical considerations were
paramount throughout the study, including respect for participant autonomy and
confidentiality.
The study acknowledges potential limitations such as social desirability bias and
sample representativeness and aims to address them through rigorous data collection
and analysis procedures.
Data Analysis
Thorne (2000) mentioned that data analysis, often deemed the most complex
and mysterious phase of a qualitative project, involves several key steps. Researchers
begin by transcribing audio recordings or written notes from focus group discussions
(FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs) into text format.
Many researchers use thematic analysis as a way of getting close to their data
and developing a deeper appreciation of the content (Silverman, 2005; Streubert, 2000;
Boyatzis, 1998). After transcription, researchers familiarize themselves with the data by
reading through the transcripts multiple times to gain insight into the content.
As researchers delve into the transcripts, they systematically categorize
segments of text based on their content or meaning, a process known as coding. These
codes serve as labels or categories that help organize and analyze the data, forming
the foundation for subsequent analysis.
Following coding (categorization), researchers identify and develop overarching
themes or patterns within the data. Themes represent broader concepts or ideas that
emerge from the coded data, providing insight into participants' perspectives and
experiences.
Researchers analyze the data within each theme to explore relationships
between different concepts, identify variations across participants, and draw
interpretations or conclusions. This involves comparing responses from different focus
groups or interviews, examining the frequency or intensity of themes, and looking for
explanations for observed patterns.
To ensure the validity and reliability of the findings, researchers may triangulate
the results by cross-checking findings from different data sources or methods.
Triangulation helps to corroborate the findings and enhance the credibility of the
analysis.
Finally, researchers interpret the findings in the context of existing literature,
theories, or frameworks, and report their results in a research report or manuscript. This
involves synthesizing the key findings, discussing their implications, and making
recommendations for future research or practice.
Each sentence integrates a step of the data analysis process within the broader
context provided.
Role of the Researchers
According to positivistic paradigm, social reality is to be understood as an
objective entity, and it is the job of the scientist to uncover this entity bit by bit—to go out
and find the truthc (A.S. Fink, 2000). The role of the researchers in this study was
pivotal in ensuring the successful implementation of the research process and the
attainment of its objectives. As qualitative researchers, the team adopted various roles
and responsibilities throughout the study, which encompassed both practical and ethical
considerations.
First and foremost, the researchers served as facilitators of the research process,
guiding the study from its conceptualization to its conclusion. This involved designing
the research methodology, selecting appropriate data collection methods, and
overseeing the execution of the study in accordance with ethical guidelines and best
practices.
Additionally, the researchers acted as liaisons between the participants and the
research objectives, fostering trust and rapport with the participants to facilitate open
and honest communication. Building meaningful relationships with the participants was
essential for ensuring the quality and depth of the data collected.
Moreover, the researchers played a crucial role in data collection, employing a
combination of focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs) to gather
rich and diverse perspectives on the lived experiences of students raised by
grandparents. The researchers conducted the interviews and facilitated the FGDs,
ensuring that all participants had the opportunity to share their experiences and insights.
Throughout the data collection process, the researchers remained mindful of
ethical considerations, including informed consent, confidentiality, and participant well-
being. Ethical validation of interview questions was conducted to ensure that the
research was conducted in an ethically sound manner and adhered to ethical guidelines
and standards.
In addition to their roles in data collection, the researchers were actively involved
in data analysis and interpretation. This involved transcribing and coding the data,
identifying themes and patterns, and drawing interpretations based on the findings. The
researchers engaged in reflexivity, critically reflecting on their own biases and
assumptions to ensure the credibility and validity of the analysis.
Overall, the role of the researchers was multifaceted and dynamic, requiring a
combination of technical expertise, interpersonal skills, and ethical integrity. By fulfilling
their roles diligently and conscientiously, the researchers were able to conduct a
rigorous and insightful study that shed light on the lived experiences of students raised
by grandparents.
Ethical Considerations
Ethical considerations are paramount in conducting research, especially when
exploring sensitive topics such as the lived experiences of vulnerable populations like
students raised by grandparents. As stressed by Neuman (2006) in writing a research,
the researcher must take into account the various ethical issues, concerns, dilemmas
and conflicts that arise during the process. Ethics defines what is or are not legitimate to
do or what moral research procedure involves. It is often a balance between two values;
the pursuit of scientific knowledge and the rights of those being studied (Boydell, 2007;
Shenton, 2004; Richards, & Schwartz, 2002). Throughout the research process, the
ethical principles of respect, beneficence, justice, and integrity were carefully upheld to
ensure the well-being and rights of all participants involved.
First, informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their
involvement in the study. This process involved providing detailed information about the
purpose of the study, the procedures involved, potential risks and benefits, and the
voluntary nature of participation. Participants were assured of their right to withdraw
from the study at any time without consequence.
Additionally, confidentiality and privacy were rigorously maintained to protect the
anonymity of the participants and the confidentiality of their responses. Participants'
identities were anonymized in all research materials, and strict measures were taken to
safeguard the confidentiality of any personal or sensitive information shared during data
collection and analysis.
Furthermore, the researchers ensured that the study was conducted in a manner
that respected the cultural and social contexts of the participants. This involved being
sensitive to cultural norms and practices, avoiding any actions or behaviors that could
be perceived as disrespectful or insensitive, and seeking to foster a safe and inclusive
research environment.
Moreover, the researchers were mindful of the power dynamics inherent in the
researcher-participant relationship and took steps to mitigate any potential imbalances
of power or coercion. This included maintaining transparency about the research
process, empowering participants to make informed decisions about their participation,
and acknowledging and addressing any conflicts of interest that may arise.
Throughout the research process, ethical validation of the study protocol and
data collection instruments was sought from relevant institutional review boards or
ethics committees. This ensured that the research was conducted in accordance with
established ethical guidelines and standards and that the rights and welfare of the
participants were upheld.
In summary, ethical considerations were central to every aspect of the research
process, from the design and implementation of the study to the analysis and
dissemination of the findings. By upholding ethical principles and values, the
researchers demonstrated their commitment to conducting research that is respectful,
responsible, and socially responsible.
Trustworthiness
Ensuring trustworthiness of a qualitative study can be increased and essential to
maintaining high credibility and objectivity (Suter, 2006; Gay & Airasians, 2003;
Richards & Schwartz, 2002), it is the quality achieved in the study if the data collected is
applicable and consistent. In qualitative research, trustworthiness is established through
several strategies to enhance credibility, dependability, confirmability, and
transferability.
I. Credibility
Credibility. To establish credibility, rigorous methods were employed throughout
the research process. This included maintaining transparency about the research
procedures, data collection, and analysis techniques. Additionally, member checking
was conducted, allowing participants to review and validate the interpretations of their
experiences. By engaging in reflexivity, the researchers acknowledged and addressed
potential biases, further strengthening the credibility of the findings.
II. Dependability
The dependability of the research findings was ensured through systematic
documentation of research procedures and decisions. Detailed records were maintained
to provide transparency and facilitate the replication of the study by other researchers. A
history of data collection and analysis processes was also kept, allowing for the
assessment of dependability by external reviewers.
III. Confirmability
Confirmability was maintained through an objective and transparent approach to
data analysis. The researchers strived to maintain neutrality and objectivity throughout
the research process, minimizing the influence of personal biases on the interpretation
of the data. Peer debriefing sessions were conducted to validate interpretations and
ensure that conclusions were grounded in the data rather than personal perspectives.
IV. Transferability
To enhance the transferability of the findings, rich and detailed descriptions of the
research context, participants, and data collection procedures were provided. This
allowed readers to evaluate the relevance and applicability of the findings to their own
contexts or populations. Moreover, thick descriptions of participant experiences and
verbatim quotes were included in the research report to provide readers with a deeper
understanding of the phenomenon under study.
By addressing these dimensions of trustworthiness, the researchers bolstered
the credibility and relevance of their findings, instilling confidence in the validity and
utility of the research outcomes.