3.
26
Example 3.1c showed how to find a rate equation by using the fractional life method where F = 80%.
Take the data from that example and find the rate equation by using the half-life method. As a
suggestion, why not take CA0 = 10, 6, and 2?
Solution
Reactant A decomposes in a batch reactor:
A -> Products
The composition of A in the reactor is measured at various times with results shown in the following
columns 1 and 2
Column 1 Column 2
Time, t (s) Concentration, CA (mol/l)
0 10
20 8
40 6
60 5
120 3
180 2
300 1
- Using half-life method to determine the rate constant k:
(1)
- Then, we take logarithms:
(2)
=> (3)
- From the eq (3), we can think about the linear equation between and , then plot it from
the logarithms table:
CA0 (mol/l) CA (mol/l) = 0.5 CA0 (mol/l) Time, t (s)
10 5 60
6 3 80
2 1 120
Take logarithms:
0.69897 1.778151
0.477121 1.90309
0 2.079181
Then, plot the curve:
From interpolation, we have the slop: 1-n = -0.420873584 => n = 1.420873584
- From eq (1), replacing t=60 (s), CA0 = 10 (mol/l) and n = 1.420873584, we have k = 0.005089
- Therefore, the rate equation of this reaction is:
( )
- The reason why we do not take the value of CA0 = 10, 6, and 2?
I think it will be more accuracy to take 10, 6 and 2 because when we take the half-life time because we
already had the data in the given table. Instead of taking CA0 = 10, 5, and 2 like example 3.1c, when we
take half-life time, there is no data for 5 (mol/l) and we need to calculate and it will be some errors here.
- For the half life method in this solution, taking CA at 6 mol/l is more convenient since at 50% of CA (3
mol/l), the correspond value of time is recorded while at 50% of CA = 5 mol/l (2.5 mol/l), the time value
is not recorded in the table then we have to interpolate on the graph, hence more error in calculation
will occur