0% found this document useful (0 votes)
334 views15 pages

Midterm Summer 24

The document outlines the rules and structure for the Econ 102 midterm exam, including timing, point distribution, and materials allowed. It consists of four main questions covering topics such as GDP calculation, the Solow model, consumer utility functions, and labor supply and demand. Each question is worth 60 points, with specific instructions on how to show work and answer the questions.

Uploaded by

joannawijaya0810
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
334 views15 pages

Midterm Summer 24

The document outlines the rules and structure for the Econ 102 midterm exam, including timing, point distribution, and materials allowed. It consists of four main questions covering topics such as GDP calculation, the Solow model, consumer utility functions, and labor supply and demand. Each question is worth 60 points, with specific instructions on how to show work and answer the questions.

Uploaded by

joannawijaya0810
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Econ 102 Midterm

Chris Surro
July 16, 2024

Name:

Student ID:

Exam Rules
1. The exam starts at 10:45 and ends at 12:50.

2. The exam is out of 250 points. There are 4 open response questions worth 60 points
each. The final 10 points come from filling out the post-midterm survey.

3. Please put all materials other than your calculator, a pen or pencil, your cheat sheet
and your ID in your bag. If you have a phone or other item out for any reason you
will be given a 0 on the exam.

4. If you have a question or need to go to the bathroom raise your hand and a TA will
come help you.

5. On the open response questions you must SHOW ALL WORK. No credit will be given
for an answer with no work.

1
1. (60 points) In this question we will study a small economy that consists of only 4 indus-
tries: A mine that produces iron, a blacksmith that produces iron goods, a farmer that
produces wheat, and a baker that bakes bread. There is also a small local government
that collects taxes, prints currency (we’ll call it dollars), and provides defense services.
In one year, the following activities take place

1. The mine produces 100 pounds of iron, which it sells to the blacksmith for $5 per
pound.
2. The blacksmith uses all of the iron to produce pitchforks, which it sells to the
farmer for $200, swords, which it sells to the government for $100, a new oven,
which it sells for $200 to the baker, and hammers, which it sells for $300 to the
blacksmith
3. The government pays its soldiers $200 to provide defense services
4. The farmer produces $400 worth of wheat, which it sells to the baker
5. The baker uses all of the wheat to produce $800 worth of bread. Of the $800,
$600 is purchased by private individuals, $100 is purchased by the government,
and $100 is shipped to a neighboring country.

(a) (20 points) Using the expenditure approach, calculate GDP for this economy and
classify into the 4 components of GDP expenditure (Hint: note that the iron and
wheat is entirely used up in the production process, while pitchforks, swords, the
oven, and hammers are not)

2
(b) (20 points) Using the value added approach, calculate the value added for the 4
industries and the government in this economy.

(c) (20 points) Assume that in the following year, the farmer decides to import its
pitchforks rather than buy them from the local blacksmith. However, the black-
smith is not prepared for this change and still produces the same amount of
pitchforks, which it puts in storage to sell in the following year. Explain how this
would change your calculations in (a) and (b).

3
2. Assume a Solow model with production function given by F (K, L) = AK 1/2 L1/2 .
Assume the saving rate is 40% and the depreciation rate is 5%. Population grows at
3% per year and technology (A) grows at 1% per year

(a) (20 points) If k̃0 = 100, calculate k̃1 and k̃2 (round to the nearest tenth). What
value will k̃ reach in the long run? Draw a graph showing how k̃ will change over
time from k̃0 = 100

4
(b) (20 points) Assume the saving rate increases to 50%. Calculate consumption per
effective worker before the change, immediately after the change and in the long
run (steady state). Draw a graph showing how consumption per effective worker
changes over time.

5
(c) (20 points) In 1960, Japan had a very low GDP per capita compared to other more
developed countries. In the following decades, Japan experienced rapid growth in
GDP per capita and by 1990 had a level of GDP per capita among the highest in
the world. Since 1990, Japan’s GDP per capita has significantly slowed, growing
only about 1% per year. Could such a growth pattern be explained by the Solow
model? If so, explain what the parameter values could look like to explain this
pattern. If not, explain what is inconsistent between the model and data.

6
3. (60 Points) Assume that 2 consumers in an economy have utility function over con-
sumption in 2 periods given by

U (c1 , c2 ) = ln(c1 ) + ln(c2 )

Consumers are given an endowment of income in each period

y1A = 48, 000 y1B = 32, 000

y2A = 52, 000 y2B = 68, 000

(a) (20 points) If the interest rate were 0%, how much would each consumer optimally
choose to consume in each period? At this rate, would there be an excess supply
of saving or an excess demand for borrowing?

7
(b) (20 points) Calculate the equilibrium interest rate and consumption and saving
for each consumer (you do not need to write down the Lagrangian but you should
show all other steps in calculating the answer). Which consumer is a borrower
and which one is a saver? Explain the intuition.

8
(c) (20 points) During the Covid pandemic, the government gave each person in the
economy a stimulus check, increasing their income by 2,000. Assume that this
happened in period 1 in the model above. Without calculating the new equilib-
rium interest rate, would you expect the interest rate to increase or decrease?
What would happen to total saving in the economy? Explain.

9
4. (60 points) An economy consists of 140 identical consumers and two firms, a fast food
restaurant and a retail store. Assume that each firm sells its output at a price of 1 so
real and nominal wages are equivalent.

(a) (15 points) Assume that each consumer has utility function over consumption and
leisure given by
U (c, l) = c − (24 − l)2
They can work for a wage w, which they spend on the consumption good c
and have 24 hours in a day to split between leisure l and labor h. Derive each
consumer’s labor supply function (you do not need to setup a Lagrangian but
must show all other steps)

10
(b) (15 points) The two firms in the economy each have the same production function
given by
1
Y = 120L − L2
10
Calculate each firm’s labor demand function (must show all steps in deriving your
answer).

11
(c) (10 points) Assuming that workers can move freely between industries (meaning
the wage should be equal in the two firms), calculate the equilibrium wage and
total number of hours worked in the economy.

12
(d) (20 points) In 2024, California imposed a $20 minimum wage that only applied
to fast food firms. According to the model described above, what would be the
effects of this intervention? In particular, calculate how many workers would work
at each firm and what wage each firm would pay. How does this compare to the
equilibrium in part c? (Hint: Start by calculating how many hours the fast food
firm would want to hire at a wage of $20 and how many hours each worker will
want to work at a wage of $20)

13
Extra Space

14
Extra Space

15

Common questions

Powered by AI

Utility functions with components for consumption and leisure highlight the trade-off faced by workers; they optimize labor supply by balancing income from labor against satisfaction from leisure. For instance, a quadratic disutility from labor framework leads consumers to work until marginal utility from income matches the marginal disutility from labor lost leisure. When confronted with jobs from two types of firms, workers compare wages and decide how to allocate their labor, evidencing how utility functions shape labor supply within an economy where preferences and wage equality influence distribution of work.

Japan's economic stagnation post-1990 showcases limitations of the Solow growth model, which suggests an economy should grow at a steady pace influenced by technology. However, the model fails to consider factors like demographic shifts, market saturation, and structural economic adjustments contributing to slowed growth. The Solow model's assumption of constant technological progress and focus on capital accumulation does not adequately capture the complex, multifactorial realities affecting Japan, such as innovation plateau, industrial shifts, and policy impacts, highlighting gaps between theoretical predictions and actual economic occurrences.

An increase in the saving rate from 40% to 50% would initially reduce consumption per effective worker, as more output is diverted to investment. Over time, the increased investment raises the capital per worker, leading to a higher steady-state level of output. However, the ultimate effect on consumption depends on the balance between increased output and the higher saving rate. In the long run, consumption per effective worker may either increase or remain lower compared to the original steady state due to the higher capital stock and output growth.

In the given model, a reduction in interest rates would make future consumption less expensive relative to present consumption, potentially increasing consumers' propensity to borrow, thereby increasing present consumption. Consumer A might increase consumption today due to the reduced cost of borrowing against future income, while Consumer B might find it optimal to save less. The aggregate effect would depend on each consumer's intertemporal preferences and endowments.

The expenditure approach calculates GDP by summing up consumption, investment, government spending, and net exports. In this small economy, the GDP would be the sum of: $600 from private consumption, $100 from government consumption, and $100 from net exports, totaling $800. The value-added approach, on the other hand, involves calculating the value added at each stage of production. Here, the mine adds $500, the blacksmith $500, the farmer $400, and the baker $400, with the government adding $100 from services, for a total GDP of $1,900.

The Solow model can explain Japan's growth from 1960 to 1990 through rapid capital accumulation and technological advancements after WWII, aligning with high saving and investment rates. The slowdown post-1990 can also be explained by the model as the economy reaches its steady state, where diminishing returns to capital slow growth to match the technology growth rate. However, the model doesn't fully account for other factors like structural economic changes and globalization effects that may have contributed to Japan's growth patterns.

In the long run, capital per effective worker (˜k) will reach a steady state where investment equals depreciation plus capital needed for growing population and technological advancements. Given the saving rate, depreciation rate, population growth, and technology growth, the long-term steady-state ˜k can be computed via the equation s*f(k) = (n + δ + g)k, solving for k where growth rates align with savings and depreciation adjustments. Assuming standard values, the steady state reflects equilibrium between these forces.

In the scenario where locally produced pitchforks are replaced with imports, GDP calculated under the expenditure approach might decrease due to increased imports reducing net exports. The value-added approach will show reduced contributions from the blacksmith industry as storage of unsold pitchforks leads to a backlog rather than immediate economic activity. This change can stress local industries, potentially leading to reduced income for affected firms and workers, unless they can reallocate resources or find new markets.

Distributing $2,000 stimulus checks would likely increase the immediate income of consumers, boosting consumption in the short term. The increased demand could lead to upward pressure on prices and potential inflation if supply cannot match the increased demand. Depending on the marginal propensity to consume, the economy might also see a temporary increase in savings. Overall, increased liquidity can drive economic activity and help stabilize consumption in the short run. However, without calculating the new equilibrium interest rate, predicting precise changes in saving behavior is challenging.

The $20 minimum wage set for fast food firms creates a labor price floor above the equilibrium wage, leading the fast food firm to demand fewer labor hours if it cannot increase prices. Workers willing to work at this rate may not match the firm's demand, resulting in excess supply of labor. Compared to pre-intervention equilibrium, fewer workers are employed at the fast food firm, and more may seek employment at the retail store, which still pays the market equilibrium wage. The policy can lead to distortions such as unemployment among those who only qualify for fast food industry jobs.

You might also like