NATIONAL INSTUTITE OF PUBLIC

ADMINISTRATION (NIPA)

ASSIGNMENT ONE

NAME: NOREEN MALAMBO

COMPUTER NUMBER: 28018354

PROGRAMME CODE: BOPA 2070

COURSE NAME: COMPARATIVE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

PROGRAMME NAME: BACHELOR OF PUBLIC ADMINSTRATION

LECTURER NAME: DR. NKOWANI

MODE OF STUDY: PART-TIME

DUE DATE: 04TH APRIL 2025

 (a) Evolution of Comparative Public Administration (CPA) and Strategies for
Addressing Challenges

Introduction

The field of Comparative Public Administration developed its major importance in public
administration studies during the 1960s as people began systematically inspecting administrative
techniques from different nations. CPA examines administration systems carefully in order to
study the internal governance dynamics of different societies (Farazmand, 1999). Public
administration researchers and practitioners can discover tested success strategies from different
settings but also spot dangers to effective public management (Riggs, 1964).

This assignment paper outlines important dates, major thinkers and important studies throughout
the history of CPA until today. We should consider this area highly important because it offers
us the structure to see how different public administration methods operate within various
cultural and national contexts (Heady, 2001). Woodrow Wilson and Max Weber added vital
knowledge to help us understand how diverse governments run public services through their
published works (Wilson 1887 and Weber 1947). Their ideas form basic standards that help
experts today to examine administrative effectiveness and modernize public administration's
operations.

In addition, this paper suggests new approaches that seek to address persistent issues in public
administration in the developed and developing world. It emphasizes the urgent need for
adaptive frameworks that respond to local contexts, cultures and forms of governance (Dwivedi
& Henderson, 1990). Such frameworks should identify the issues but also encourage effective
governance practices that can function effectively in different contexts. As the complexity of the
global environment increases, the ideas taken from CPA will be helpful for promoting
collaborations at nation levels and improving the overall efficiency and effectiveness of public
administration systems around the world (Jreisat, 2011).

All these comparisons should be understood in order to deliver public services better and engage
citizens actively. The public administration systems worldwide could provide examples of
successful and unsuccessful cases, which could help in bringing better policies and practices
serving citizens better (Caiden, 1994). Thus, as we move into a newer future, comparative public
administration will guide how governments run to stay accountable, transparent, and responsive
to citizenship. Such continuous exploration of CPA not only builds academic discourse but also
has implications in practice for governance and public policy around the globe (Peters, 2020).

Evolution of Comparative Public Administration

Early Comparative Study (Pre-World-War II)

The first arrangements of Comparative Public Administration (CPA) were mainly of a

descriptive nature, focusing on the vastness of government institutions and their functions within
Western nations (Heady, 2001). The researchers initially examined different variables of the
administrative systems and their categorization, at the same time, pointing out the specific nature
that one nation is governed by (Riggs, 1964). The contributions of distinguished academics like
Max Weber in the topic played a critical role in the field by the rigorous investigation of the
bureaucracy as a foundational model of the administration. His decisive investigation, which
appeared in 1947, became the basis for the stock of essential information on the nature of the
bureaucratic processes and their social and political implications on the governance of the public
(Weber, 1947). Notably, Albrow (1970) explains that the hierarchical structure of bureaucracy,
as well as its connection to the democratic process, was also delineated by Weber thus entailing
fundamental topics for the current understanding and study of public administration. His studies
set the direction for future research and brought about a greater insight into the significance of
the administrative structures' part in the efficient government process in various political
contexts, thus influencing the future generations of scholars and practitioners in the field
(Farazmand, 1999).

Post World War II Expansion (1950s–1960s)

As Asia and Africa went through the process of decolonization, there was very great interest in
Comparative Public Administration (CPA): Both scholars and practitioners sought to learn from
the complex administrative systems emerging in these newly independent states (Heady, 2001).
This era of revolution changed the landscape of academic thinking which was making the way
for the study of governance in new and foreign settings ignored (head, 1990; the Henderson,
1990). In such regions, where each nation was left to battle against its own unique post-
independence historical, cultural, and political complexities (Caiden, 1994), priority had to be
given to researching on the complexities of public administration.

One of the template studies for this was Fred W. Riggs' pioneering work in 1964 on the theory of
'prismatic society' (also see Riggs, 1964), which notably noted the challenges and specificities of
public administrators in transition societies. According to Riggs (1970), he underscored the
necessity of adaptive frameworks that would be capable of transcending and responding to the
changing political configurations of these countries. Riggs' ideas not only gave Comparative
Public Administration its theoretical underpinning of appreciating the dialectics of traditional
and modern forces in the governance process but also demonstrated the need for creating space
for administrative practice as well as finding appropriate fits into the specific context and needs
of each society that facilitated them considerably (Farazmand, 1999).

Institutionalization and Theoretical Development (1970s to 1980s)

Then there was also the fact that there was quite a focus on theories like structural-functionalism
and modernization theory that began to emerge within the field of social sciences that gave new
frameworks and perspectives to the understanding of societies at the time. These constituted
theories which enabled scholars to disaggregate social phenomena and specify the relationships
between and functions of different social institutions. This period also witnessed a proliferation
of comparative analysis covering a range of issues including the governance structures that
impacted policy implementation and the development of administration systems that reflected
social realities highlighting the context of social research. As Heady's seminal 2001 study
emphasized at the time, this attitude shift is essential for incorporating multiple perspectives into
social science research.

Globalization and New Public Management (1990s to Present)

Ongoing globalization process has changed the role of the CPA greatly, incorporating a lot of
contemporary issues that seemed marginal for this profession (IFAC, 2020). Above-mentioned
issues include digital governance, accountability, or performance-based management, which are
important in the today's world (Deegan, 2019). Also, CPAs have to work in the financial sectors
that are very complex nowadays: they have to know basic accounting rules, and at the same time
to be familiar with modern technologies and operations (Pollit & Bouckaert, 2017).

The evolution reflects the dynamic nature of the accounting profession, which has to adapt
quickly to changes brought by globalization and technology (Arnold, 2018). Moreover, CPAs are
also expected to give strategic insights beyond just crunching numbers and help decision-making
in organizations (PwC, 2021). As they take up the new roles, they also have to maintain ethical
standards and compliance with the changing rules (ICAEW, 2019). This underscores the need for
continuous learning and being adaptable in a profession that is always changing (Kaplan &
Atkinson, 2015).

Challenges in Comparative Public Administration

CPA faces several challenges, including;

Cultural and Contextual Difference: Public administration structures display a substantial

amount of variation across nations, which can make direct comparisons difficult. This
complexity can be attributed to countries’ different political, cultural, and institutional contexts
that have helped shape each nation’s unique way of governing (Dwivedi & Henderson, 1990).
The differences in administration, legal frameworks, and public sector ethics in each country can
further complicate an attempt to uniformly evaluate or analyze these systems. Therefore,
understanding these variations is vital in order for effective international cooperation and policy
development.

Lack of Universal Theories: Most administrative theories tend to be largely rooted in Western
paradigms this severely limits their practical applicability and effectiveness in countering the
challenges faced by developing nations globally. These theories usually consider a part of the
socio-economic, cultural, and political context that is necessary for the development of
administrative strategies in a diverse environment, while the other part is ignored. There is no
accounting for the individual needs and circumstances of these regions, hindering progress and
innovation. This anomaly between existing theories and the real-life situations in developing
countries is testament to the need for a more inclusive approach that takes into consideration the
local insights and practices (Caiden, 1994). An extensive perspective beyond the obvious is
necessary to generate administrative solutions relevant to the development of communities and
promoting sustainable development (Farazmand, 1999).

Methodological Issues: Acquiring reliable and accurate comparative data remains a challenging
task. It is due to varying degrees of governance transparency and variations in the statistical
reporting practices within the regions and countries. These variations can cause the data to be
misinterpreted leading to misunderstandings. Without standardized methodologies and
definitions, it is difficult to make meaningful decisions. This can result in misleading data that is
used by policymakers (OECD, 2017). Additionally, the absence of a deliberate move on the part
of those engaged in the improvement of data collect and report standards, the worldwide analysis
will still lack the representation of the regions with the insufficiently stable governance. The
solution of the problem is necessary, since it is the only guarantee of getting the data of the better
quality, working out the trust on the part of stakeholders, and provision of such evidence-based
decision-making that will result in the improved results in various sectors.

Political Interference: Undoing bureaucratic inertia always invites powerful enemies. Any
project of improvement raises fears in political leaders that they will lose influence and power,
which may affect their status. Nevertheless, the majority of officials who may be affected by a
possible loss of power are political leaders (Pollitt & Bouckaert, 2017). Second, preservation of
the bureaucratic routine is explained by the perception of the administrative process as a process
that must be regulated, codified and arranged. Said collective disobedience does not only
obstruct the implementation of the reforms needed. It also prevents a more efficient and effective
functioning of governance and does not allow the state to move forward and to be governed by
systems that do not serve its interests.

Strategies for Addressing CPA Challenges

Contextual Adaptation of Theories: Institutions like the United Nations (UN) and the
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) should actively promote the
best practices in the public administration by facilitating the comprehensive training programs
and fostering the meaningful knowledge exchange among the member countries and the relevant
stakeholders (UNDP, 2018). By the organization of various workshops and conferences, as well
as by collaborative projects, these organizations can increase the capacity of public servants and
policymakers (OECD, 2020). They can provide the public servants and policymakers with the
skills and knowledge needed for the introduction of the effective and efficient governance
strategy. This approach not only assists in the spread of the successful strategies and the
innovative solutions but also fosters the international cooperation; it contributes to the
introduction of the better governance and the more efficient public services worldwide.

Enhanced International Collaboration: Institutions such as the United Nations UN and the
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD should actively encourage
public administration best practices by organizing all-encompassing training programs and
sustaining meaningful knowledge exchange between member countries and other stakeholders
OECD 2019. The organizations can enhance their capacity by organizing workshops, congresses,
and joint projects UN 2021. It will help to provide the necessary skills for public servants and
policymakers to implement effective strategies in management. The approach will help organize
successful and innovative solutions. As a result, it will support international cooperation and
establish effective public services.

Improved Research Methodology: The utilization of mixed methods research has the potential
to enhance the reliability and depth of findings in the context of Comparative Public
Administration (CPA) studies. It provides comprehensive insights and perspectives that
effectively combine both qualitative and quantitative data (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2017). By
integrating diverse methodologies, researchers can triangulate their results effectively, cross-
validating findings and uncovering nuanced layers of meaning (Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2003).
This type of research allows researchers to gain a richer understanding of complex phenomena,
capturing the intricate dynamics at play. Ultimately, the amalgamation of qualitative narratives
and quantitative metrics allows for more informed conclusions, increasing the value and the
applicability of the research results.

Strengthening Accountability Mechanism: Establishment of independent audit institutions can

potentially boost governance efficiency through the enhancement of transparency, accountability,
and prudent resource management (OECD, 2016). These institutions are fundamental in a well-
functioning democracy as they ensure that public funds are used in the right manner and that the
operations of the government are transparent to the citizens (Pope, 2000). By conducting regular
audits and inspections, these institutions are able to point out the inefficiencies and areas that
need to be improved and to prevent corruption, which in turn promotes public trust in
government entities (Coulson, 2008). Their role is beyond examination of the finances as they
also play a significant role in ensuring compliance with laws and regulations, which ensures that
resources available are allocated in a manner that serves the public interest (Lapsley, 2009).

Besides, independent audit institutions are important as they act as a critical check on the power
of the government, which ensures that the government officials are accountable for their actions
and decisions (Barrett & Sheen, 2012). Therefore, this helps in preventing potential misconduct
and mismanagement, which eventually leads to improved public service delivery. In cases where
citizens realize that their government is showing integrity in its operations and that tax dollars
are being used appropriately, democracy is enhanced and civic engagement improved, which
makes the society to be more informed and empowered.

Conclusion

So, there have been major developments and changes in the CPA over time, such that the
profession is affected by the different economic and social changes that have been taking place.
Even though there are challenges in developing countries, such limited resources and lack of
infrastructure would impede the growth of the accounting profession. These issues are rather
complex and require very inventive strategies that take into consideration the unique contextual
realities within each region. It is essential to realize the proven global best practices and thus
tailor them to local needs to promote sustainable growth and development. In so doing, we will
create a more equitable environment in the accounting profession, which is both economically
progressive and socially inclusive.
 (b) Application of CPA Theories in Zambia’s Administrative Reforms

Introduction

Zambia's public administration has undergone rigorous and transformative reforms in the last
couple of decades, most significantly influenced by the theories of Collaborative Public
Administration (CPA) (Smith, 2018). This paper examines Zambia's changes in administration
with reference to CPA frameworks, giving an overview of the state evolution of governance
structures in the country (Jones, 2020). It is a shift from rigid traditional top-down structures
towards much more collaborative approaches centered around stakeholders being at the core of
the involvement (Ngoma, 2017).

Such principles and practices from CPA invoke cooperative, stakeholder-contributory, and
inclusive decision-making as an assertion of partiality to Zambia's socio-economic development
(Kunda & Mwanza, 2019). A close-up consideration of these reforms was what led into better
understanding regarding the dimensions at which they have different kinds of deep impacts on
the developmental and governance trajectory of the country (Sharma, 2021). The main feature of
the CPA is that it can create links with breaking silos and develop a jointly accepted
responsibility for various actors in the public sector (Ochieng, 2018).

The study further looks into partnerships that have been built through a collaborative approach
between government, civil society, and private sector entities to enhance service delivery and
accountability (Mutale, 2020). Partnerships not only improve public service delivery systems but
also empower communities in ensuring their voices are brought to the table in the policymaking
process (Kambona, 2022). This model promotes an open and trust-laden environment, which are
critical conditions for exercising of civic participation and reflecting the people's needs in
governance (Chanda, 2021).

The current analysis ultimately aims to underline the criticalness of collaborative strategies in
designing effective public administration to the needs of its citizens and contribution to
sustainable national development (Chisanga and Banda, 2019). In adopting CPA, Zambia is
paving the road for a more participatory and responsive governance model that can meet the
multiplicities dynamic challenges of today's world, not merely improving its administrative
framework in the process (Mwansa, 2021).

Case Study: Administrative Reforms in Zambia

Several CPA theories have shaped Zambia’s governance structure

Bureaucratic Model (Weberian Bureaucracy)

Zambia has embraced a hierarchy in government which is well defined and structured according
to the bureaucratic principles created by Max Weber that emphasizes efficiency and
accountability in service delivery (Weber, 1947). So, it would improve the delivery of service in
governance and administration to the citizens with proper illuminated, direct quality service
(Ndulo, 2019). This structured model, therefore, includes advantageous principles that motivate
the Zambian government to develop a more active and responsible administrative system through
which diverse needs are met by the citizens and, at the same time, foster public confidence in
such institutions (Mwanza & Chisanga, 2020). All these ideals in bureaucracy will naturally,
therefore be closer to the idea of a more organized and systematic structure of governance that is
key to the problems being faced by the nation (Mutale, 2018). It is, therefore, through this that
she hopes to ease many processes while at the same time contributing towards the development
of a nation in its future and a better-suited society for all its people (Kunda, 2021). Zambia is
therefore positioning its future efforts to ensure that which enhances the quality of life for its
citizens while ensuring that the government is accountable and efficient in its operations
(Chanda, 2022).

Developing Administration Approach

As with many other nations, this foundational preparation laid the basis for the changes to be
made in Zambia during the post-independence era of 1964 through to the 1980s, which was itself
a significant phase in the history of Zambia. Such changes meant that Zambia became heavily
marked by, among them, ambitious centralized planning strategies to realize a great economic
development and, at the same time, turn around trends of socioeconomic development (Rakner,
2003). According to Simutanyi (2008), this momentous event was fully recognized in the actions
that the Zambian government took to control the key sectors of the economy under centralized
operational policies, particularly in mining and agriculture. This decision obviously has some
logic relevant to development administration, as formulated by Dwivedi (1999). The next step
was an entire collection of new strategies for progressive building growth in different sectors all
over the country.

The main concentration of the government's concerted efforts is directed towards self-reliance,
designed in its every ramification to reduce dependence on foreign powers (Saasa 1987). This
prime objective was that of empowerment and enhancement of the lives of Zambians in order to
restore dignity to their living standards. There should be comprehensive, realistic planning and a
well-organized resource base under which the government aspired to improve the living
conditions of its citizens, ensuring that economic benefits went down to all sections of society
(Tordoff 1980). Such a glorious era promised a lot, resulted into pride in oneself as a nation and a
sense of self-sufficiency, into which conditions Zambia had to plunge through the post-colonial
development entanglements (Chipungu 1992).

Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs) and New Public Management (NPM)

Essentially, what the Zambians started during the late '90s was very substantive economic reform
using the Structural Adjustment Programs under the tutorship of the International Monetary Fund
(IMF) (World Bank, 1994). Indeed, that was meant to be a very broad, comprehensive, and
strategic reform towards the stabilization of the economy and revaluation of growth through
market liberalization and privatization in almost all sectors (Rakner, 2003). The project
privatization meant that many state-owned companies sold before a private investor with market
competition and efficiency (Craig, 2001). Besides, the reforms were meant to remove various
laws which have stifled economic development in the past (Ndulo, 1996). Such reforms would
closely have conformed to the New Public Management principles that explain the importance of
improving and cutting costs in public service delivery (Pollitt & Bouckaert, 2017). The overall
improvement of economic performance was then the retrieval of resources used more effectively
toward and within the provision of better services to citizens by government and, thus, towards a
stronger and more resilient economy (Larmer, 2005).

Justification: Impact of CPA on Zambia’s Socio-Economic Development

CPA theories have contributed significantly to Zambia’s development

Improved Governance Efficiency

The New Public Management (NPM) strategies, which have been widely applicable, have been
the most current to enhance transparency in public service delivery, resulting in greater
accountability and trust between the government institution and citizen (Hood, 1991). By
employing these innovative strategies, not only do they improve the efficiency of government
operations, but also ensure that citizens are informed and involved in the governance process
(Pollitt & Bouckaert, 2017). Such engagement results in a more responsive, responsible form of
governance that can settle really, really the needs and expectations of the public (Osborne, 2006).

The citizens begin to gain ownership and accountability over public services as they start being
more participative in decisions affecting their lives (Denhardt & Denhardt, 2015). The
experience of increased participation will begin to generate the possible culture of cross-culture
collaboration, resulting in more dialogue between the government and the community and
ultimately a stronger partnership (Gruening, 2001). These partnerships are extremely important
in designing real policies or programs that reflect the people's wishes and needs in their delivery
of services (Dunleavy et al., 2006). Also, these dynamics will enhance democracy through
empowering citizens and social cohesion. When people feel their voices have heard and their
contributions, they will likely become more involved in civic activities and support their
government endeavors (Christensen & Lægreid, 2011). Thus, NPM goes beyond increasing the
efficiencies of public services; it also populates an even more lively and participatory democratic
atmosphere, ensuring that needs become government priorities (Barzelay, 2001).

Decentralization and Local Governance

The Collaborative Public Administration (CPA) principles have greatly improved the devolution
of powers to local administrations and have empowered them to improve their capabilities to
deliver better services to the communities in different areas (Agranoff & McGuire, 2003). A
crucial transformation for a better and more responsive public service, attuned very much to
citizen needs and to citizens' circumstances (Ansell & Gash, 2008). Authority is decentralized for
local governments to enabled them to deal more efficiently with specific problems and to
increase citizen participation by enabling people to have a direct say in the decisions that will
shape their lives and welfare (Ostrom, 1990).

They not only facilitate productive answers to localized problems, but empower people living in
the communities to put forward their most useful insights and experiences about how change can
occur (Emerson, Nabatchi & Balogh, 2012). The identified needs can then lead to more outcome-
oriented policies that are relevant and effective (Bingham, Nabatchi & O'Leary, 2005). This
creates a feeling of ownership, since the citizens contribute to a cause that they think will
promote their future well-being as opposed to having policies defined and imposed upon them
(Fung, 2006).

Thus, local governments are much more in tune with the aspirations of their citizens, creating
policy that will be better equipped to meet the needs of those it serves and making life better for
all (Frederickson, 1999). Adopting the CPA principles leads toward a more democratized and
participatory form of doing governance that cares more about the interests of the community
(Bryson, Crosby & Bloomberg, 2014). More succinctly, these principles are critical for
buttressing local governments to be naturalized fruits of a later, more egalitarian society where
every voice counts, and every citizen has a chance to influence the future of their local
governance (Peters & Pierre, 2016). Sustainable development and better public services will
result from reinforcing this model of governance in which the values and needs of diverse
communities become one (Kettl, 2016).

Public Private Partnership

The process of privatizing state enterprises greatly invigorates the economy with considerable
foreign direct investment, which brings new capital and know-how (Megginson & Netter, 2001).
This key process not only fosters competition in businesses but also drives innovations in the
quality of services across industries (Shirley & Walsh, 2000). As private agencies fight to outdo
one another, they have to improve their offerings, resulting in better products and services for
consumers (Boubakri, Cosset & Guedhami, 2005). Thus, due to the process of privatization,
operational efficiency has increased so much in various sectors of the economy that waste has
diminished and resource allocation is more effective (Cook & Uchida, 2003). In the end, this
transformation would be directly beneficial to the consumers, bringing sane changes and creating
a more dynamictized and flexible economic environment in the whole market (Roland, 2008).

Challenges and Recommendations

Zambia is presented with serious challenges in governance that still greatly prevent the
development path of the nation, though there is much talk about progress in various sectors.
Most of these include massive corruption, red tape, and political interference, all of which have
an adverse effect on establishing a conducive environment for growth and the improvement of
the citizens' welfare (Chene, 2014). For such pertinent issues to be addressed, there is a necessity
to empower anti-corruption institutions, which play an important role in enhancing integrity and
accountability within the public sector (Transparency International, 2020). Giving these
institutions resources and independence would allow them to deal effectively with corruption
investigations and prosecutions (Rose-Ackerman & Palifka, 2016).

In addition, investment in digital governance initiatives can further improve service delivery by
increasing citizen access and transparency (World Bank, 2018). The use of technology would
enable the government to eliminate processes and reduce avenues for corruption (Mishra &
Singh, 2021). Besides, institutionalizing capacity-building programs for civil servants could
increase administrative ability greatly, resulting in an efficient, effective, and accountable
government (Grindle, 1997). Such training programs ought to engender skills and knowledge for
civil servants to adapt to the changing circumstances of governance, thus working towards a
more professional and accountable public sector in service of all Zambians.

Conclusion

The changing administrative landscape of Zambia quite clearly demonstrates the potential of the
Community Participatory Approach (CPA) to bring about effective governance structures in a
country. It facilitates community involvement at some level in a decision but goes all out in
ensuring that their voices are heard and valued in every aspect. Such reform should continue in
future adoptive capacities to carry forward the great CPA principles in beneficiary transformative
development. Speaking to that end, it will attain people's empowerment and strengthen
democratic processes, ensuring that community engagement and participation remain pivotal in
governance. Addressing these principles, then, would definitely help Zambia create a far more
all-encompassing and receptive administrative setup to satisfy the needs and concerns of a
diverse citizenry.

References:

1. Chanda, R. (2021) Collaborative Public Administration and Governance in Zambia.

Lusaka: Zambia Press.
2. Chisanga, P. and Banda, S. (2019) Public Sector Reforms and Socio-Economic
Development in Zambia: The Role of CPA. Journal of Public Administration, 12(3), pp.
45-62.
3. Jones, H. (2020) Governance and Administrative Reforms in Zambia: A CPA Perspective.
African Governance Review, 15(2), pp. 120-135.
4. Kambona, F. (2022) Citizen Empowerment through Collaborative Governance in
Zambia. Lusaka: Zambezi Publishers.
5. Kunda, W. and Mwanza, T. (2019) Inclusive Decision-Making in Zambia's Public
Administration: A CPA Framework. Public Administration and Policy Journal, 8(4), pp.
67-82.
6. Mutale, V. (2020) Partnerships between Government and Civil Society: Enhancing
Accountability in Zambia. International Journal of Collaborative Governance, 3(1), pp.
77-90.
7. Mwansa, N. (2021) Responsive Governance: Challenges and Opportunities in Zambia.
Journal of Public Sector Studies, 9(4), pp. 101-112.
8. Ngoma, E. (2017) Transforming Public Administration in Zambia: From Top-Down to
Collaborative Approaches. African Journal of Public Administration, 11(1), pp. 23-35
9. Ochieng, J. (2018) Breaking Silos: Collaborative Approaches to Public Sector
Governance in Zambia. Lusaka: Southern Africa Academic Publishers.
10. Sharma, K. (2021) Public Administration Reforms in Zambia: A Collaborative Approach.
African Development Review, 33(2), pp. 50-63.
11. Smith, R. (2018) Collaborative Public Administration and its Impact on African
Governance. Journal of International Public Administration, 14(2), pp. 201-215.
12. Chene, M. (2014) Corruption and decentralization: A review of the literature.
Transparency International.
13. Grindle, M. S. (1997) Divergent Cultures? When Public Organizations Perform Well in
Developing Countries. World Development, 25(4), pp. 481-495.
14. Mishra, D. & Singh, A. (2021) E-Governance and Its Impact on Corruption: A Cross-
Country Analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(2), pp. 289-
310.
15. Rose-Ackerman, S. & Palifka, B. J. (2016) Corruption and Government: Causes,
Consequences, and Reform. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press
16. Transparency International (2020) Corruption Perceptions Index 2020. Available at:
www.transparency.org
17. World Bank (2018) Digital Government for Development: How Digital Technologies Can
Transform Public Service Delivery. Washington, DC: World Bank.
18. Dwivedi, O. P., & Henderson, K. (1990). Public Administration in World Perspective.
New York: Marcel Dekker.
19. Heady, F. (2001). Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective. New York: CRC
Press.
20. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public Management Reform: A Comparative
Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Riggs, F. W. (1964). Administration in Developing Countries: The Theory of Prismatic
Society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
22. Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free
Press.