Probe Data Sharing in Intelligent Transport
Probe Data Sharing in Intelligent Transport
REPORT 4286
First edition
2021-08
Reference number
ISO/TR 4286:2021(E)
© ISO 2021
ISO/TR 4286:2021(E)
Contents Page
Foreword......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... iv
Introduction...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................v
1 Scope.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1
2 Normative references....................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
3 Terms and definitions...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
4 Use cases for the probe vehicle systems data sharing framework.................................................................... 2
4.1 The conceptual framework for vehicle probe system data sharing........................................................... 2
4.2 Concept of data sharing of vehicle probe data............................................................................................................. 3
4.3 Probe data sharing benefits.......................................................................................................................................................... 4
4.3.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................................................................... 4
4.3.2 Benefits of data sharing.............................................................................................................................................. 4
4.3.3 Model of data sharing function............................................................................................................................. 5
4.3.4 Standards................................................................................................................................................................................ 5
4.3.5 Applicability of data distribution technologies...................................................................................... 5
4.3.6 Metadata.................................................................................................................................................................................. 5
4.3.7 Storage and access........................................................................................................................................................... 5
4.3.8 Data ownership and IPR............................................................................................................................................. 5
4.3.9 Challenges............................................................................................................................................................................... 6
5 Definition of service domains utilizing shared probe data....................................................................................... 6
5.1 General............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 6
5.2 Referenced target use cases.......................................................................................................................................................... 6
5.2.1 General...................................................................................................................................................................................... 6
5.2.2 Infrastructure operation management.......................................................................................................... 8
5.2.3 Traffic Management....................................................................................................................................................... 9
5.2.4 Road traffic management.......................................................................................................................................... 9
5.2.5 Enforcement...................................................................................................................................................................... 10
5.2.6 The role of service providers.............................................................................................................................. 11
6 Data sharing use cases..................................................................................................................................................................................15
Annex A (informative) Japan use case...............................................................................................................................................................16
Annex B (informative) Australia use case.....................................................................................................................................................17
Annex C (informative) Singapore use case...................................................................................................................................................18
Annex D (informative) US use cases....................................................................................................................................................................19
Annex E (informative) China use case...............................................................................................................................................................20
Annex F (informative) Korea use case...............................................................................................................................................................21
Bibliography.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 22
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out
through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical
committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work.
ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of
electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are
described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the different approval criteria needed for the
different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of
any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or
on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www.iso.org/patents).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation of the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and
expressions related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO's adherence to the
World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT), see www.iso.org/
iso/foreword.html.
This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 204, Intelligent transport systems.
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A
complete listing of these bodies can be found at www.iso.org/members.html.
Introduction
When discussing transportation systems, much attention has been paid to safety, comfort, impacts on
the environment and energy efficiency. The use of probe data (specified in ISO 22837) is a key factor in
dealing with the above issues.
Probe vehicle data are collected through various vehicles in an ITS system, but the data are typically
used only for a specific application by the service provider. To boost efficiency, it is recommended that
the vehicle probe data be shared by various service applications through common databases.
Current probe vehicle systems collect and use data, but do not share data with other ITS service
applications. Vehicle probe data are valuable for all related services and limiting the use of such data
to within one service only ought to be avoided for efficient data use. Sharing probe data among service
providers enhances quality of service, as the probe data collected through the sensors and other
sources can be utilized by other service providers.
As an example, shared common database can be used for new services, such as an advanced notification
safety information provision service, by utilizing roadside sensor data collected by a road authority.
Many other new services can be added as the number of CAV (connected and automated vehicle)
increases.
This document describes probe data sharing use cases so that additional service can be developed by
sharing probe data collected by various probe vehicle systems.
The functionalities of a probe vehicle system (PVS) can be implemented in an ITS station unit according
to ISO 21217 and support application protocols specified in other standards. Examples of such protocols
are the local dynamic map (LDM) specified in ISO/TS 18750, and generic ITS station facilities layer
services specified in ISO/TS 17429. The service architecture classifies ITS services including PVS, and
this classification also defines service domains for cooperation between PVSs.
It is noted that this document does not prescribe a physical communication medium for transmitting
data/information to or from vehicles. This document is intended to be independent of any communication
medium and to be compatible with any medium that is selected by the system developers.
In addition, this document focuses only on the framework for vehicle probe data sharing use cases.
1 Scope
This document describes various use cases for the sharing of probe vehicle data as a common
platform for smart city instantiation. When modernizing a city towards a smart city, it is necessary
for information flows across various fields, such as transportation, healthcare, energy, water and
other government services, to be effectively managed and shared. Despite efforts from many cities,
integrating all databases related to all services has proven to be a cumbersome task. One challenge
is the lack of a systematic way that can be modelled for data sharing. The ITS data sharing model for
vehicle probe data can serve as the basis for instigating this type of work. To elaborate how vehicle
probe data work can be applied to achieve this objective, this document:
— gathers use cases and examples of vehicle probe data sharing around the world, and
— provides use cases for data sharing that are appropriate for smart city ITS mobility solutions.
By examining these use cases and current and planned data sharing practices around the world, this
document demonstrates how this mechanism can help implement many smart city applications.
This document also shows that by combining the vehicle probe data with roadside sensor data, and
other important public and private data sources, the services can be operated more effectively.
Data collection methods and data or information provisioning are beyond the scope this document.
Specifically, this document does not describe items related to the vehicle probe data collection nor the
vehicle probe data provision activities as specified by other existing standards such as ISO 19414.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 14812:—1), Intelligent transport systems — Vocabulary
ISO 19414, Intelligent transport systems — Service architecture of probe vehicle systems
ISO 22837, Vehicle probe data for wide area communications
ISO 24100, Intelligent transport systems — Basic principles for personal data protection in probe vehicle
information services
3.1
data sharing
activity between two or more service providers where the data can be combined and processed to
create data for new application services
4 Use cases for the probe vehicle systems data sharing framework
4.1 The conceptual framework for vehicle probe system data sharing
Various probe data systems are deployed and successfully operated by service providers independently.
However, most likely, the vehicle probe data collected by one ITS systems can only be used for a
specific application by the service provider and are not shared among other applications. In exploiting
applications and services for a smart city, such data cannot be used effectively, for the purpose of
solving smart city mobility issues, for example. Part of the issue is that the service providers often work
in their own specific application silos and fail to see the value of data sharing from a holistic viewpoint.
It is recommended that the vehicle probe data be shared among stakeholders; this sharing could
support various potential fields of services for smart city service applications via a common database.
Ideally, all the data in each application supporting a smart city ought to be exchanged through all
fields of services with a common format. However, this is not feasible as most of the vehicle probe data
systems in place are deployed at different times and provided by different vendors. In the case of the
probe vehicle system, for example, aside from the data gathered from certain applications or services
which do follow a set of standards, most of the data collected requires transformation or conversion to
ensure data interoperability. From a data access efficiency viewpoint, the best place to implement these
data conversions is at the common database.
Although data interoperability is essential when adopting the common database for probe data, data
ownership and privacy protection need to be taken into consideration as high priority issues. Probe
data might need to be gathered from sources applying proprietary means. Some service providers can
consider that such data bear much value and can be reluctant to grant the access to those data freely.
Furthermore, some probe data can be associated with an individual and needs to be specially protected
according to personal privacy protection regulations.
This document describes useful use cases for sharing vehicle probe data and provides useful examples
currently used and planned around the world. This document provides role model descriptions of data
sharing only, and does not cover data collection, nor data provision.
The conceptual framework of the vehicle probe system, as shown in Figure 1 below, depicts the relations
among stakeholders, such as a service provider, vehicles including connected and automated vehicles
(CAV), roadside systems and the roadside operation authorities. The key is to have a common database
so that all the service data, regardless of their origins can be fed and stored in the common database.
Since the implementation of such a framework for probe data systems can vary, the framework depicted
in Figure 1 is for reference only and cannot include all the stakeholders and outlines of their roles.
As shown in Figure 1, the service provider, through the pre-provision process, requests vehicle data from
a vehicle and the vehicle provides vehicle data to the service provider accordingly. The service provider
stores data into the database and executes application services with the support of the database, and the
processed information of those services are provided back to the vehicle. Likewise, the service provider
can exchange information with road authorities. In some cases, the service provider can collect probe
data from the vehicle through a road authority. In such a case, the vehicle data are collected by roadside
sensors and passed to the road authority. Data collected through other roadside sensors can also be
collected by the road authority. The road authority can then aggregate those data and send them to the
service provider. In return, the service provider can provide the processed valuable information to the
road authority.
NOTE 1 Service provider A database has vehicle probe data as per ISO 19414.
NOTE 2 Service provider B database has vehicle probe data from commercial vehicle of TARV as per ISO 15638.
NOTE 3 Service provider C database has public transport data as per ISO 17185.
NOTE 4 Service provider D database has traffic management centre data as per ISO/TS 19468.
The data from TMC (traffic management centre) in Figure 2 includes examples of currently available
road authority's traffic data.
Sharing probe data among current service providers and additional service providers enables the
creation and realization of additional new application services.
ISO/TS 21177 and ISO/TS 21184 cover secured access to sensor and control networks of ITS stations
in general. A standardized data format based on standardized data types is specified to enable data
exchange between ITS stations and ITS applications. Secure certificate-based Access Control is specified
in ISO/TS 21177, combined with ISO/TS 21184 using configuration data. Required data models are
specified in ISO/TS 21184.
4.3.1 Introduction
The observations detailed in the following subclauses can be derived through probe data sharing.
Through the shared common database, where maintenance service is maintained as an advanced
service and various functions including the Internet connection can be used, the opportunity to use the
data sharing function has become a common use case for smart city solutions. The merit of this data
sharing function can be summarized into the following two points:
a) Easy exchange of data — Data can be converted into common data format and exchanged quickly
and reliably without going through the store and distribute processes. In addition, it is possible to
apply various security settings, such as setting access rights for the users for each data element,
which can enhance data security.
b) Simple management of data — As data can be managed centrally, data management is simplified. In
addition, there can be minimum time lag while updating the data.
To use the data sharing function among service providers, it is required to set up users and user groups
according to the role of the users and the controlled accessible data.
As shown in Figure 3, users often have multiple roles, and consideration needs to be given to the
grouping method and security setting.
4.3.4 Standards
Existing probe data standards and sharing policy standards already defined by the local authority can
be utilized.
4.3.6 Metadata
Metadata sharing policies already defined by the local authority can be utilized.
General storage and access to shared data integration already defined by the local authority can be
utilized.
Clear guidelines already defined by the local authority can be utilized for identifying data ownership
and licencing, including IPR, of probe data, supporting data and processing tools.
4.3.9 Challenges
There are several challenges which need to be analysed and solved when deploying probe data sharing
among multiple service provider entities:
— It is important to define the rules regarding data storage to respect data privacy.
— The entity in charge of maintaining and processing the collected probe vehicle data and its liability
need to be defined.
— The governance rules for such an entity need to be defined.
— Decision-making on the policy needs to be done, whether it is a centralized entity framework or a
cloud framework that can be completed through multiple decentralized entities.
5.1 General
Sharing of probe vehicle data among current service providers and additional service providers can
support the implementation of new service applications needed for smart city services. For example,
data sharing could eventually be implemented to satisfy infrastructure assessment needs and to
improve safety within cities.
Possible service applications can include:
— critical safety information provision,
— safety driving support,
— infrastructure planning,
— dynamic traffic management,
— traffic rule enforcement,
— dynamic map updates, and
— emergency evacuation support.
Where applicable, probe data sharing definitions already defined by the local authority can be utilized.
For deployment, further research or development of data sharing is recommended.
5.2.1 General
ITS service applications largely rely upon the big data collected through the applications and services of
a smart city that are held and maintained by a smart city data management entity. Those ITS services
can be grouped into two categories: the services provided by jurisdiction or the road operator; and
the services by the public and private service providers. The applications offered and managed by
the jurisdiction or the road operator can be classified in four groups as “infrastructure operation
management”, “traffic management”, “road traffic operation management” and “enforcement”. The
applications provided by the service providers can be offered through public or private sectors. The
classification of an ITS service and applications can be shown in Figure 4.
Numerous emerging ITS service applications for smart city deployment have been growing rapidly in
recent years. The following list provides examples of those applications:
— Traffic management applications to ease traffic congestion and maintain safety in urban areas
— Road traffic operation applications to realize efficient and safer use of infrastructure
— EFC support for Urban-ITS traffic management to realize dynamic road pricing
— Weigh in motion to ease heavy goods transport vehicles
— Dangerous goods/hazardous materials transport management to enforce geo-fencing
— Disaster information provisioning systems for safer and more timely evacuation activities
— Infrastructure services applications for efficient and automated maintenance works
— Access control in urban areas to control vehicle entry to certain areas
— Traffic signal (SPaT-MAP): signal phase and timing, and road topology message information
provisioning for safer and more efficient traffic flow in the urban area
— Law enforcement applications for regulated freight vehicles such as overloaded vehicle shutout
from certain urban areas
— Remote digital tachograph monitoring to maintain safe freight transport vehicle movement
— Heavy vehicle air quality controls and geo-fencing in certain urban areas
— Emission control of vehicles entering certain urban areas to enforce geo-fencing in certain areas of
the smart city
— Autonomous vehicle applications such as monitoring, emergency controls, override command,
regulated information provisioning
— Urban/suburban/expressways mobility modes-specific safety information provisioning and traffic
monitoring
— Dynamic map management including probe data collection, data aggregation, managing digital
twin in the cloud and provisioning of safety information
— Electronic fee collection from services such as parking, event admission, car sharing
— Vehicle remote maintenance applications such as over the air software updates
— Freight vehicle management applications supporting efficient and safer transport fleet operations
— Electric vehicle charging applications such as booking, monitoring and fee collections with security
management
— Fuel cell vehicle charging applications like those previously mentioned
— Intelligent parking such as an automated valet parking supporting system
— Car sharing management including booking, matchmaking between user and driver, safety
information provisioning
— Public transit information provisioning to users on timely and dynamic real time basis
— Taxi fleet management applications such as booking, matchmaking between users and drivers,
safety information provisioning
— Dynamic map-utilizing service applications for automated driving buses, shuttles and freight
vehicles for efficient and safer operations
— Tourist information/advice provisioning service applications for inbound users
— Bicycle/motor cyclists' ITS service applications such as vulnerable road user safety information
provision services
Major use cases and business cases for smart city ITS service applications, currently available and
future ones are shown here for information only. The example uses cases shown in this document are
each referenced with a URL link information; however, there is no intention to promote those use cases
as a standard but for references only. Further applications can be expected to be developed in the future
depends on how the smart city ITS regulators can implement their initiative with the local government.
The example use cases are grouped according to the classifications shown in Figure 4.
The use cases that fall into the “Infrastructure operation management” category shown in Figure 5 are
infrastructure service applications focusing on service vehicle operational efficiency and automated
maintenance.
NOTE Infrastructure operation management services applications are effective for efficient and automated
maintenance works. Examples can be found at: [Link] ww.e-nexco.co.jp/en/activity/safety/.
In this case, road maintenance service vehicles operations, such as a snowplough dispatching operation,
become safer and more efficient with proper monitoring and controlling from adding back-office
management.
The “traffic management” use case (see Figure 6) can be applied to all vehicles, freight vehicles, and
automated vehicles.
For all vehicles, traffic management applications to ease traffic congestions and maintain safety in
urban area are effective.
For automated vehicles, automated driving vehicle support applications such as monitoring, emergency
control, override command and regulated information provisioning are effective.
EFC support for Urban-ITS traffic management is effective for realizing dynamic road pricing.
The examples include:
1) Traffic management applications to ease traffic congestion and maintain safety in urban areas, in
which the smart city ITS traffic centre monitors traffic conditions and controls both signals and
road signs to ease traffic congestion.
2) EFC support for smart city ITS traffic management to realize dynamic road pricing, in which the
smart city traffic centre controls traffic by changing toll fees dynamically to divert traffic flows
to other road networks. In such cases, the traffic centre also provide feedback to toll operators to
adjust toll fees to maintain the quality of service (QoS) of the toll road operations.
An example can be found at: [Link] ww.e-nexco.co.jp/en/activity/safety/.
3) Autonomous vehicle support applications, which monitor road conditions, assist emergency
control, respond to override command and update regulated information provisioning. In such an
example, the automated driving vehicle relies mainly on its own sensor data, but the safety level
can be increased with support from the infrastructure.
Example can be found at: [Link]
-vehicles-could-solve-the-last-mile-problem-cda15f6a09d5.
The road traffic operation management use case is shown in Figure 7. The road traffic operation
applications improve the efficiency and make it safer to use the infrastructure by allowing the road
authority to control the traffic volume of the road, especially on the expressways.
Road traffic operation management applications are effective for realizing efficient and safer use of
infrastructure.
They are normally implemented through controlling the volume of the vehicles entering the road with
ramp metering.
An example can be found at: [Link] ww.e-nexco.co.jp/en/activity/safety/.
5.2.5 Enforcement
Enforcement is a broad subject for smart city ITS. This subject can be further divided into two
categories: enforcement for all vehicles and enforcement for freight vehicles as shown in Figure 8.
For all vehicles, access control in urban areas to enforce vehicle entry to certain areas is effective.
For freight vehicles, weigh in motion (WIM) to ease heavy goods transport vehicles, dangerous goods/
hazardous materials transport management to enforce geo-fencing and law enforcement applications
for regulated freight vehicles such as overloaded vehicle shutout from urban areas are effective.
Applications such as remote digital tachograph monitoring to maintain safe freight transport vehicle
movement, heavy vehicle air quality controls and geo-fencing in urban areas and emission control of
vehicles entering urban areas to enforce geo-fencing in certain areas of the city are also effective.
The use cases include:
1) Access control in urban areas to control vehicle entry to certain areas, in which the smart city ITS
enforcement controls the traffic volume by controlling the access of each vehicle to the city centre.
An example can be found at: [Link] ructionrev iewonline.com/2014/12/vehicle-access
-security-systems/.
2) Emission control of vehicles entering urban areas by enforcing geo-fencing in restricted areas of
the city, in which the smart city ITS enforcement centre monitors and controls the traffic volume to
keep the air clean near the city centre.
An example can be found at: [Link]
-0826.
3) Weigh in motion to ease heavy goods transport vehicles, in which the smart city ITS enforcement
agency monitors or detects overloaded vehicles to keep road traffic safe.
An example can be found at: [Link] ww.q-free.com/products/high-speed-low-speed-weigh-in
-motion/.
The role of service providers, public or private, can be examined in the four categories as shown in
Figure 9.
inside or in a nearby area to the parking facility. Verifying user rights and payment process are
included in the service.
An example can be found at:
[Link] ww.youtube.com/watch?v=dfnHGPGv5AU.
8) Car sharing management including booking, fee collection, battery monitoring and maintenance:
the service provider provides service information required for car sharing applications to the car
or ride sharing service entity and to the car share users for booking confirmation, fee collection,
and issuing of receipts.
An example can be found at:
[Link]
9) Dynamic map utilizing service applications for automated driving bus, shuttle and freight vehicles
for efficient and safe operations: the service provider monitors and controls the automated vehicles
and records the status for passengers, goods for an efficient and safe operation.
An example can be found at:
[Link] ww.researchgate.net/f igure/A n-illustration-of-the-automated-buses-demonstrated-in
-La-Rochelle_ fig1_ 304530355.
10) Freight vehicle management applications supporting efficient and safe fleet operation: the service
provider monitors freight vehicles by collecting vehicle probe data and provides safety information
to the vehicles. A vehicle owner can monitor and control the routes and monitor the surroundings
of the vehicle to maintain efficient pick-up or drop-off schedules and safety for both the driver and
the goods.
An example can be found at:
[Link] ww.ieiworld.com/smart-transportation/jp/f leet-management-solution.php.
11) Electric vehicle (EV) charging applications, such as charging stall booking, monitoring, fee collection
and security: the service provider offers an EV user the availability and status information of the
charging facility for timely booking and use.
An example can be found at:
[Link] ww.dreamstime.com/hands-holding-smartphone-charging-app-electric-car-recharging
-batteries-modern-vector-illustration-autonomous-plug-image147182505.
12) Fuel cell vehicle (FCV) charging applications: the service provider offers a FCV user the availability
and status information of the charging facility for timely booking and use.
An example can be found at:
[Link]
13) Public transit information provisioning to users in a timely and dynamic real-time basis: the service
provider provides timely, real-time public transit information to the users for a stress-free use of
public transit service.
An example can be found at:
[Link] ww.rambus.com/blogs/well-always-have-paris-but-not-the-metro-ticket-2/.
14) Taxi fleet management applications such as booking, matching between user and driver, and safety
information provisioning: the service provider offers the taxi user service which provides users
the information to support a timely booking and use. The owner of the taxi fleet can perform easy
and efficient management. A driver can pick up or drop off users by using the information provided
by the matching service for accuracy in both the persons and locations provided by the service
provider.
An example can be found at:
[Link] ww.sintrones.com/f leet-management.html.
15) Tourist information or advice provisioning service applications to visitors: the service provider
provides the inbound tourists the information or advice provisioning service which provides users
the information needed for their timely touring activities.
An example can be found at:
[Link] for_owner/.
16) Bicycle or motor cyclists' ITS service applications, such as vulnerable road user safety information
provisioning services: the service provider provides safety information to the bicycle or motorcycle
users in a timely manner. Vehicle or infrastructure sensor data are used and V2X communication is
indispensable for this service.
An example can be found at:
[Link]
Annex A
(informative)
The data sharing use case shown in this annex and depicted in Figure A.1 was provided by Japan's HIDO
(Highway Industry Development Organization). The use case describes a planned service application
in Japan using a probe data system called ETC2.0 which is currently deployed. Its probe vehicle data
are used for an automated driving vehicle merging support safety application service. Data sharing
between the traffic control system and the probe vehicle data system is necessary.
This is an example of an information provision service. Further details on the service are available (in
Japanese) at:
[Link] ww.nilim.go.jp/lab/bcg/k isya/journal/k isya20180119.pdf
NOTE 1 Vehicle probe data in the main line are collected through a DSRC- I2V antenna at the roadside.
NOTE 2 Main line traffic/infrastructure information is provided to the merging vehicle through a DSRC-I2V
antenna.
NOTE 3 The objective is to support automated driving vehicles in merging into main line traffic safely.
Annex B
(informative)
The data sharing use case described in this annex was provided by the ARRB (Australian Road
Research Board). The use case is called “The National Freight Data Hub” and was established by
ARRB on 2019-04-10 under the title “DIRDC FREIGHT DATA REQUIREMENTS STUDY INSTITUTIONAL
ARRANGEMENTS”. The report is available at:
[Link] p-content/uploads/2019/04/Appendix-D-DIRDC-Freight-Data-Requirements
-Study-Institutional-Arrangements.pdf
The purpose of this report is to consider how datasets and information related to Australia’s freight
supply-chain industry could be collected, hosted, and disseminated and under what governance
arrangements.
Annex C
(informative)
The data sharing use case highlighted in this annex is called “Use of Dedicated Short-Range
Communication (SRC) Beacons for Information Dissemination to Autonomous Vehicles” and was
provided by the Singapore LTA (Land Transport Authority).
Reference documents concerning this use case are as follows:
— [Link] ww. lta. gov. sg/c ontent/l tagov/e n/n ewsroom/2018/3/2/t esting- of-future- traffic
-management-systems-commences-at-major-traffic-nodes.html
— [Link] ww. imda. gov. sg/-/m edia/i mda/f iles/r egulation-licensing- and- consultations/i ct
-standards/telecommunication-standards/radio-comms/imda-ts-dsrc.pdf
— [Link] ww.itu.int/en/ITU-T/extcoop/c its/Documents/Workshop-201707-Singapore/010%20-
%20Alan-Quek-Singapore%20Autonomous%20Vehicle%20Initiative%20(SAVI).pdf
Annex D
(informative)
US use cases
D.1 Introduction
The data sharing use cases highlighted in this annex were provided by the US SwRI (Southwest Research
Institute.
Annex E
(informative)
The data sharing use case highlighted in this annex was provided by ITS China and is called "Open
Platform with Big Data Cloud for Integrated Multimodal Mobility and Information". It was launched at
the Third World Internet Conference on November 17, 2016. See [Link] ransportdata.cn.
Annex F
(informative)
The data sharing use case highlighted in this annex was provided by ITS Korea and is called "MLIOT for
Intelligent Transportation Systems". It provides fundamental traffic information to the public.
Reference documents concerning this use case are as follows:
— [Link] ww.its.go.kr/Eng/main.jsp
For the Seoul Metropolitan City use case, refer to:
— [Link]
For the Daejeon City use case (how to gather the traffic information), refer to:
— [Link] raffic.daejeon.go.kr/mainFront/atmsMain.do
— [Link] raffic.daejeon.go.kr/map/t rafficInfo/t rafficState.do?roadName=Y&upDir=Y&downDir=Y
(real time traffic)
— [Link] raffic.daejeon.go.kr/map/waySearch/waySearchTransit.do (fast route)
— [Link] raffic.daejeon.go.kr/map/waySearch/waySearchTransit.do (public transportation)
— [Link] portal.daejeon.go.kr/datm/regular.view
— [Link] 67.17/i bmcognos/c gi-bin/c ognos. cgi? b_ action= c ognosViewer& u i. action=r un
&u i. object= s tore ID('i7acb9 ad0f2274b3 586406c8e7 b9519c6')& C AMUsername= G UEST1&
CAMPassword=GUEST1
For the Korean Highway Express (EX) use case, refer to:
— [Link] ww.e-hipassplus.co.kr/
Bibliography
[1] ISO 21217, Intelligent transport systems — Station and communication architecture
[2] ISO 18750, Intelligent transport systems — Co-operative ITS — Local dynamic map
[3] ISO/TS 17429 (all parts), Intelligent transport systems — Cooperative ITS — ITS station facilities
for the transfer of information between ITS stations
[4] FHWA-JPO-13-091, US-Japan Collaborative Research on Probe Data: Assessment Report,
November 2013
[5] ISO/TR 4445:—2), Intelligent transport systems — Mobility integration — Role model of ITS service
application
[6] ISO/TS 21184, Cooperative intelligent transport systems (C-ITS) — Global transport data
management (GTDM) framework
[7] ISO/TS 21185, Intelligent transport systems — Communication profiles for secure connections
between trusted devices
[8] ISO/TS 21177, Intelligent transport systems — ITS station security services for secure session
establishment and authentication between trusted devices
[9] ISO/TS 25114, Intelligent transport systems — Probe data reporting management (PDRM)
[10] ISO/TS 29284, Intelligent transport systems — Event-based probe vehicle data
[11] ISO 16461, Intelligent transport systems — Criteria for privacy and integrity protection in probe
vehicle information systems
[12] ISO/TR 23255:—3), Intelligent transport systems — Architecture — Applicability of data
distribution technologies within ITS