0% found this document useful (0 votes)
66 views25 pages

Ch5 2 Modified (1

The document discusses Thevenin's and Norton's theorems, which are essential for simplifying complex circuits by focusing on relevant information. It provides a general procedure for determining Thevenin equivalents, including calculating open circuit voltage and short circuit current, and demonstrates source transformation as a method to reduce circuit complexity. Additionally, it covers techniques for circuits with independent and dependent sources, emphasizing the importance of these theorems in circuit analysis.

Uploaded by

mada.mora2002
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
66 views25 pages

Ch5 2 Modified (1

The document discusses Thevenin's and Norton's theorems, which are essential for simplifying complex circuits by focusing on relevant information. It provides a general procedure for determining Thevenin equivalents, including calculating open circuit voltage and short circuit current, and demonstrates source transformation as a method to reduce circuit complexity. Additionally, it covers techniques for circuits with independent and dependent sources, emphasizing the importance of these theorems in circuit analysis.

Uploaded by

mada.mora2002
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

THEVENIN’S AND NORTON’S THEOREMS

These are some of the most


powerful analysis results to be
discussed.
They permit to hide information that
is not relevant and concentrate in
what is important to the analysis

CLO-3: Apply Thevenin’s and Norton’s theorems for circuit analysis and use the Maximum-Power-
Transfer theorem.
ANOTHER VIEW OF THEVENIN’S AND NORTON’S THEOREMS

RTH i a

i +
+ RTH vO
vOC _ vO i SC
_ 
Norton b
Thevenin
vOC
i SC 
RTH
This equivalence can be viewed as a source transformation problem
It shows how to convert a voltage source in series with a resistor
into an equivalent current source in parallel with the resistor
SOURCE TRANSFORMATION CAN BE A GOOD TOOL TO REDUCE THE
COMPLEXITY OF A CIRCUIT
EXAMPLE: SOLVE BY SOURCE TRANSFORMATION In between the terminals we connect a current
source and a resistance in parallel
The equivalent current source will have the
value 12V/3k
The 3k and the 6k resistors now are in parallel
and can be combined

In between the terminals we connect a voltage


source in series with the resistor

The equivalent source has value 4mA*2k

The 2k and the 2k resistor become connected


in series and can be combined

After the transformation the sources can be combined


The equivalent current source has value 8V/4k
and the combined current source has value 4mA

Options at this point

1. Do another source transformation and get


a single loop circuit

2. Use current divider to compute I_0 and then


compute V_0 using Ohm’s law
PROBLEM Compute V_0 using source transformation

EQUIVALENT CIRCUITS
I0

Or one more source transformation

Req R3 3 current sources in parallel and


three resistors in parallel

RTH R4
Veq  Req I eq V0 
+
Veq R4 V0 Veq
VVeqTH Req I eq
-

 R4  R3  Req
A General Procedure to Determine the Thevenin Equivalent
vTH Open Circuit vo ltage
voltage at a - b if Part B is removed
i SC Short Circuit Current
current through a - b if Part B is replaced
by a short circuit

RTH
v
 TH Thevenin Equivalent Resistance One circuit problem
i SC
LINEAR CIRCUIT i 0 a
1. Determine the Remove part B and May contain  
independent and
Thevenin equivalent compute the OPEN dependent sources vOC Vab
with their controlling
source CIRCUIT voltage Vab variables _
_
PART A b

Second circuit problem


2. Determine the Remove part B and
LINEAR CIRCUIT i SC a
SHORT CIRCUIT compute the SHORT May contain 
current CIRCUIT current I ab independent and
dependent sources v0 I ab
with their controlling
_
vOC variables

vTH  vOC , RTH  PART A b

i SC
AN EXAMPLE OF DETERMINING THE THEVENIN EQUIVALENT
R1
VTH Part B is irrelevant.
a The voltage V_ab will be the value of the
Thevenin equivalent source.
To Part B
VS + IS
- R2 I SC What is an efficient technique to compute the
open circuit voltage?
b
VTH VTH  VS
  IS  0
R2 R1 NODE
Now for the short circuit current ANALYSIS
Lets try source superposition 1 1 VS
(  )VTH   IS
When the current source is open the VS R1 R2 R1
current through the short circuit is
1
SC I  R2 RR
R1 VTH  VS  1 2 I S
When the voltage source is set to zero,
R1  R2 R1  R2
the current through the short circuit is
2
I SC  IS
R1R2  VS 
VS VTH    I S 
I SC  IS  R1  R2  R1 
R1
R1 R2
To compute the Thevenin resistance we RTH 
use R1  R2 Is this a
general
VTH
RTH  For this case the Thevenin resistance can be computed as result?
I SC the resistance from a - b when all independent sources have been
set to zero
Determining the Thevenin Equivalent in Circuits with Only INDEPENDENT SOURCES

The Thevenin Equivalent Source is computed as the open loop voltage

The Thevenin Equivalent Resistance CAN BE COMPUTED by setting to zero all the sources
and then determining the resistance seen from the terminals where the equivalent will be placed
R1 a
a
To Part B R1 R2 RTH
VS +
-
IS R2

b b
“Part B”
Since the evaluation of the Thevenin
equivalent can be very simple, we
RTH  3k can add it to our toolkit for the
solution of circuits!!

RTH  4k
“Part B”
LEARNING BY DOING

5k

“PART B”

6V

1k
VO  (6V )  1[V ]
1k  5k
LEARNING EXAMPLE COMPUTE Vo USING THEVENIN
In the region shown, one could use source
transformation twice and reduce that part to
a single source with a resistor.
... Or we can apply Thevenin Equivalence
to that part (viewed as “Part A”)

RTH  4k For the open loop voltage


the part outside the region
The original circuit becomes... 6 is eliminated
VTH  12[V ]  8[V ]
3 6
And one can apply Thevenin one more time!
 For open loop voltage use KVL
1
VTH 1
VTH  4k * 2mA  8V  16V
1
RTH  4k

...and we have a simple voltage divider!!

8
V0  16[V ]  8V
88
Or we can use Thevenin only once to get a voltage divider For the Thevenin resistance

RTH  8k
“Part B”
For the Thevenin voltage we have to analyze the
following circuit
METHOD??
Source superposition, for example

Contribution of the voltage source


6
1
VOC  12V  8V
3 6
Contribution of the current source
Thevenin Equivalent of “Part A” 2
VOC  (2k  2k ) * (2mA)  8V

Simple Voltage Divider


LEARNING EXTENSION: USE THEVENIN TO COMPUTE Vo

“PART B”
I
VOC


9kI  18[V ]  I  2mA
VOC  3kI  12  6[V ]

RESULTING EQUIVALENT CIRCUIT


RTH  2k 2k

RTH 
 4k VO
RTH  3k || 6k  2k VTH  6V 
4
VO  (6V )  3[V ]
44
LEARNING EXTENSION: COMPUTE Vo USING NORTON

4k
I
RN 2k
IN
I SC
 RN 
RN  RTH  3k PART B VO  2kI  2k  I N 
12V  RN  6k 
I SC  I N   2mA  2mA 3 4
3k VO  2 (2)  [V ]
9 3
COMPUTE Vo USING THEVENIN PART B
VTH
RTH

+
- 2k VO
VTH 
VTH  12 2 4
 2mA  0 VO  (6V )  [V ]
3k 27 3
RTH  3k  4k
SAMPLE PROBLEM Equivalent Resistance: Independent sources only

RTH

I2
RTH  3R || 3R  1.5R

KVL VTH Equivalent Voltage: Node, loop, superposition… Do loops
I1
 I 1 I S  VS  5R( I1  I 2 )  RI 2  0
VTH  RI 2  2R( I1  I 2 )
How about source superposition?
VS
RTH
Opening the current source: V 1
TH 
Short circuiting the voltage source 2
+
- VTH 5 1
I1  I S I 2  I S
+
IS I1 R
6 6
V2TH 1
2
VTH  RI1  2 RI 2  RI S
2
This is what we need to get 3R 2R KVL
I2 _
VTH  VTH 1
 VTH
2
SAMPLE PROLEM All independent sources
All resistors are in parallel!!


VTH

The circuit can be simplified


,,, An to compute Equivalent Source...

 
  VTH   SOURCE
TRANSFORMATION 
VTH
Voltage divider

8k
VTH   (6  24 / 6)[V ]
8k  (8 / 6)k
THEVENIN EQUIVALENT FOR CIRCUITS WITH ONLY DEPENDENT SOURCES

A circuit with only dependent sources cannot self start.

(actually that statement has to be qualified a bit.


What happens if a  R1  R2 ? )

FOR ANY PROPERLY DESIGNED CICUIT WITH ONLY DEPENDENT


SOURCES
 aI x  ( R1  R2 ) I X  0 VOC  0, I SC  0
 a  R1  R2 I x  0 This is a big simplification!!
 a  R1  R2  0  I x  0 But we need a special approach for the
computation of the Thevenin equivalent resistance

Since the circuit cannot self start we need to probe it


with an external source
The source can be either a voltage source or a
VTH  0 current source and its value can be chosen arbitrarily!
Which one to choose is often determined by the
simplicity of the resulting circuit
IF WE CHOOSE A VOLTAGE PROBE... WE MUST COMPUTE CURRENT SUPPLIED BY
PROBE SOURCE

VP  aI X VP
IP  IX  IX 
R1 R2
 1 1 a 
I   
(VP ) P  R
VP
 2 R1 R1R2 

VP
RTH 
IP
(VP ) VP
RTH 
 1 1 a 
   VP
 R2 R1 R1R2 
The value chosen for the probe voltage is irrelevant.
Oftentimes we simply set it to one
IF WE CHOOSE A CURRENT SOURCE PROBE

We must compute the node voltage V_p


KCL
VP
(IP ) VP VP  aI X IX 
  IP  0 R2
R2 R1
 1 1 a 
   VP  I P
 R2 R1 R1R2 
(IP ) VP
RTH 
IP

The value of the probe current is irrelevant. For simplicity


it is often choosen as one.
LEARNING EXAMPLE FIND THE THEVENIN EQUIVALENT

V1 V1  2VX V1  VP
KCL @V1 :   0
V1 1k 2k 1k
VP Controlling variable: VX  VP  V1
SOLVING THE EQUATIONS
4 3
V1  VP , V X  VP
7 7
VP VP  2VX VX
Do we use current probe or voltage probe? IP   
2k 1k 1k
If we use voltage probe there is only one 15VP
node not connected through source IP 
14k

VP 14
VP
RTH   k
I P 15
IP Using voltage probe. Must compute
current supplied
LEARNING EXAMPLE Find the Thevenin Equivalent circuit at A - B

Only dependent sources. Hence V_th = 0


To compute the equivalent resistance we
must apply an external probe

We choose to apply a current probe R  VP


TH
IP
@V_1

VP @V_2 (IP )
 IP
Controlling variable
“Conventional” circuit with dependent
sources - use node analysis 3(V1  2V1 )  6V1  2(V1  V2 )  0
RTH
2(V2  V1 )  3V2  6[V ]
A
5V1  2V2  0 * / 2 30 10
V2  
 2V1  5V2  6 * / 5 21 7
B V2
(VP  V2 )  ( I P  1mA )  RTH   (10 / 7)k
Thevenin equivalent 1mA
SAMPLE PROBLEM

RTH
A

Thevenin equivalent
 VP 
I P  1mA I_1 = I_p/2
I_3=0 The resistance is
VP VP numerically equal
 
R_th = 2kOhms
RTH
I P 1mA to V_p but with
MUST FIND VAB  VP . METHOD? units of KOhm

Loop analysis
VX
I1  ; I2  I P
2000
2k * I3  1k * ( I 2  I3 )  2k * ( I3  I 2  I1)  4k * ( I3  I1)  0
Controlling variable VX  1k * ( I3  I 2 )
Voltage across current probe
 VP  1k * ( I3  I 2 )  2k * ( I3  I 2  I1)  0
Thevenin Equivalent
Circuits with both Dependent and Independent Sources
We will compute open circuit voltage and short circuit current
LINEAR CIRCUIT i a For each determination of a Thevenin equivalent
May contain 
independent and we will solve two circuits
dependent sources vO
with their controlling
variables _ b
PART A
Any and all the techniques discussed should be readily
available; e.g.,
KCL, KVL,combination series/parallel, node, loop analysis,
RTH source superposition, source transformation, homogeneity
a
VOC
+
VTH RTH 
-
I SC
b
The approach of setting to zero all sources and then
combining resistances to determine the Thevenin
VTH  VOC resistance is in general not applicable!!
EXAMPLE Use Thevenin to determine Vo Guidelines to partition:
“Part A” should be as simple as possible.
“Part B”
After “Part A” is replaced by the Thevenin
equivalent we should have a very simple circuit
The dependent sources and their controlling
variables must remain together

Open circuit voltage Constraint at super node V1  VOC  12  V1  12  VOC


Options???
V1 KCL at super node (12  VOC )  (aI 1X ) 12  VOC VOC
  0
1k V 2 k 2 k
Equation for controlling variable I 1X  OC
36 2k
Solve VOC  
4  (a / 1k )
Short circuit current
VA V 12V
I SC    18mA
I "X  A 0 1k || 2k
2k
VOC 2
RTH   [k]
I SC 4  (a / 1k )
Negative resistances for some “a’s”
Solution to the problem
RTH (a  2k ) Setting all sources to zero and combining
resistances will yield an incorrect value!!!!

1k
V0  VTH
VOC 1k  1k  RTH
Find Vo using Thevenin Open circuit voltage Method???
V1 Super node


VTH KVL
IX IX 

V1 V  (3V ) V1  (3 / 4)[V ]
 1mA  1 0
Short Circuit Current 2k 6k
Controlling variable
KVL  VTH  1000 I X  V1  0
V11 IX 
V1
VTH  (3 / 8)[V ] 2k
The equivalent circuit
I SC RTH 1k
I 1X
+

V11
+
2k
 1000 I 1X
VTH VO
V11 I 1X   V1  0  I X  0
1 1 -

_
2k
KCL 2
I SC  1mA  (3V ) /(6k )  0.5mA V0  (3 / 8)[V ]
2  1  (3 / 4)
VOC The equivalent resistance cannot be obtained by
RTH   (3 / 4)k short circuiting the sources and determining the
I SC resistance of the resulting interconnection of resistors
EXAMPLE: Use Thevenin to compute Vo DON’T PANIC!! Select your partition

Now compute V_0 using the Thevenin equivalent


“Part B”

6k
RTH V0  11[V ]
6k  8k
VTH

VX1
Open Circuit Voltage Use loops Loop equations I1  ; I 2  2mA
2000
Controlling variable
VX1  4k ( I1  I 2 )
VX1  2kI1  2kI1  4k ( I1  I 2 )  I1  4mA
VOC  2k * I1  3[V ] 2k * 4mA  3V  11V
KVL for V_oc

Loop equations
Short circuit current
I1 I1  4mA Same as before
Vx"
I1  ; I 2  2mA 3V  2k * I1 11
2000 I SC   mA
I sc  3V  2k ( I SC  I1 )  0 2k 2
Controlling variable Thevenin resistance
I2 VX"  4k * ( I1  I 2 ) RTH 
VOC

11[V ]
 2k
I SC (11 / 2)mA
SAMPLE PROBLEM Mixed sources. Must compute Voc and Isc
supernode
Open circuit voltage
KCL at super node I1  I X  2 I X  0
 The two 4k resistors are in parallel I1  I X
VTH
I1

I X  0  VTH  12[V ]
KCL at supernode
Short circuit current
I SC  4 I X
KVL
4k * ( I SC / 4)  12[V ]  6k * I SC  0
12
VTH 12V I SC  mA
RTH    7k 7
IX I SC I SC (12 / 7)mA
RTH
a

VTH
FINAL ANSWER 
b

You might also like