0% found this document useful (0 votes)
41 views3 pages

Annual Employee Evaluation Form

The document is an annual employee evaluation form for Genievive L. Del Prado, who works in accounting support at the head office. It includes sections for assessing professional skills and work attitude using a scoring rubric, as well as recommendations for salary adjustments or promotions. The evaluation process is designed to provide an objective assessment of the employee's performance over a specified period.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
41 views3 pages

Annual Employee Evaluation Form

The document is an annual employee evaluation form for Genievive L. Del Prado, who works in accounting support at the head office. It includes sections for assessing professional skills and work attitude using a scoring rubric, as well as recommendations for salary adjustments or promotions. The evaluation process is designed to provide an objective assessment of the employee's performance over a specified period.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Private and Confidential

ANNUAL

EMPLOYEE EVALUATION FORM

USE THE RUBRIC PROVIDED FOR OBJECTIVE EVALUATION PROCESS

Employee Name DEL PRADO, GENIEVIVE L.


Position ACCOUNTING SUPPORT
Department HEAD OFFICE
Hiring Date 7/16/2024
Evaluation Period MAY 2025
For HRD use only:
Basic Pay: ____ Rating Last Evaluation (Evaluation): ___________

A. PROFESSIONAL SKILL
Scoring of performance as a measure of the Skill and the Knowledge of employee.

No. PROFESSIONAL SKILL SCORE

Basis for scoring:


(1) Very Poor (2) Poor (3) Fair (4) Satisfactory (5) Very Satisfactory
1. Technical knowledge of the task assigned
Understands the principle, process and technical aspect of the position assigned. Can
work with minimal supervision.
2. Ability to adapt to the work environment
Ability in adapting to the demands of the job, working team, and the changing job
needs.
3. Task Management
Using working time effectively and efficiently to achieve the target. Never leave any
task undone.
4. Quality of Work
Efficient in the performance of tasks, able to meet deadlines or earlier, practice
excellence, and task need no rework.
5. Sharing and Cooperation
Gives logical idea verbally or non-verbally to improve work process. Able to work
effectively with the team.

Total Score
A
Average Score A Total Score/5
=

B. WORK ATTITUDE

Performance Evaluation -1-


Private and Confidential
ANNUAL

This category measures the attitude through the behavioral aspect of task performance and
interpersonal relations within the work unit and other departments.

No. WORK ATTITUDE SCORE

Basis for scoring:


(1) Very Poor (2) Poor (3) Fair (4) Satisfactory (5) Very Satisfactory
1. Initiative
Perform tasks using his/her best judgment. Need not to be reminded all the time in the
performance of tasks.
2. Sense of Discipline
Obeys the company Code of Conduct in the performance of tasks; Performs tasks with
integrity.
3. Decision Making
Able to make and take decisions based on logical assumptions and moral rule.
4. Leadership (ability to model good behavior)
Uses method and style of interpersonal relation for leading the individual or team
either as a superior or staff.
5. Team Work
Gives and shares information/service/support to co-worker or others quickly and on
time, find prompt ways to settle problems or looks for solution.

Total Score B

Average Score Total Score/5


B
=

TOTAL SCORE AND VALUE


A. Professional Skill [50% x Average Score A] =
B. Work Attitude [50% x Average Score B] =
Total Score =

SCORES RESULT

Very Satisfactory (4.6 – 5.0)


Satisfactory (3.6 - 4.5)
Fair (2.6 - 3.5)
Poor (1.6 - 2.5)
Very Poor (1.0 - 1.5)
Note:
QA/QC, Branding, IT, Marketing, Training staff administratively reports to Area Manager but functionally reports to their
HQ Department Heads respectively. In this case, the Area Manager will do the evaluation to be endorsed to the
Department Head for submission to HRD.

RECOMMENDATION OF IMMEDIATE SUPERIOR AND DEPARTMENT/BRANCH MANAGER:

Based on the score of performance appraisal, the recommendation will be:

Performance Evaluation -2-


Private and Confidential
ANNUAL

Recommended for Salary Adjustment


Recommended for Promotion/Retention

Others
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________

Check if applicable only:

With *Salary Increase No Salary Increase Effectivity Date _________

_______________
Immediate Superior

EVALUATOR’S COMMENTS:

For Human Resources Use only

Agree Disagree

Received and filed: Noted by:

BERNARDO MACARAEG
___________________ __________________
HR Representative PRESIDENT

EMPLOYEE COMMENTS:

Printed Name and Signature

Performance Evaluation -3-

You might also like