Auditing and Ethics TEST Suggested Answers
Auditing and Ethics TEST Suggested Answers
PART 1
Case Scenario -1
CA Sanjoy is conducting audit of PETA Education Solutions Private Limited for
the first time. The company is engaged in providing solutions to students
appearing for competitive exams under engineering and medical streams.
Company’s business is operated from physical centres spread in many states
of the country. However, of late, number of aspirants availing company’s
services are shrinking due to emergence of new competitors and inability of
company to switch to new technologies available in market to render its
services.
The company had taken bank loans in past years for expansion of its physical
centres. However, due to reduction in strength of aspirants opting for services
provided by the company, management is always looking for means to meet
its financial commitments on time. During the course of audit, CA Sanjoy
wants to be sure about revenue and profit assertions reflected in financial
statements of the company. Therefore, he is planning to test company’s
system for booking revenue in its books of accounts.
He notices that during the year under consideration, many experienced
teaching faculties have left due to late payment of their contractual payments
by the company. These have been replaced by inexperienced faculties having
lower contractual costs but leading to poor satisfaction outcomes among
aspirants. Besides, employee turnover of regular administrative staff also
remains high. The company has not organized any training programmes
either for its faculties or administrative staff for considerable period of time.
He has, in his wisdom, decided to increase the area of substantive checking in
[Link] AFD
(3)
AFD Marks
the company. He does not want to suffer from probable adverse publicity or
loss of his professional goodwill.
5. The auditor does not want to suffer from probable adverse publicity or
loss of professional goodwill. Such a situation is indicative of ___________ ?
(a) audit risk (b) auditor’s business risk
(c) auditor’s detection risk (d) non-sampling risk
ANSWERS
[Link] AFD
(5)
AFD Marks
Case Scenario -2
CA M. Raja has accepted offer of appointment of auditor of an entity. As
business carried on by the entity is new to him, he wants to gain an
understanding about the entity and its environment including its internal
control. In this regard, he has performed procedures to obtain audit evidence
about design and implementation of relevant controls. He has performed
various procedures like inquiry, inspection and observation in this regard.
He wants reasonable assurance that accounting system is adequate and that
all accounting information which should be recorded has, in fact, been
recorded.
Further, during the course of audit, he has noticed as under: -
• As required by the management, bank reconciliation is required to be
performed monthly. However, the same is not carried out as stipulated
due to time constraints faced by accountant.
• The entity has a system of procuring its raw material supplies on the basis
of valid purchase orders issued by the entity. However, purchase orders
are not numbered in a sequence properly.
• Wage sheets are not verified by a responsible official as required by
management.
• Staff of the entity is responsible for bringing cash from centers in nearby
areas to entity’s premises from where it is deposited into entity’s bank
account. However, concerned officer has not renewed insurance for cash
in transit.
AFD Marks
(c) Not performing bank reconciliation timely, lack of proper sequence
in purchase orders, not verifying wage sheets by responsible official
and lack of insurance for cash in transit
(d) Lack of insurance for cash in transit only
ANSWERS
[Link] AFD
(9)
AFD Marks
13. ABC Ltd is engaged in manufacturing of fabrics from yarn purchased
from different suppliers. Occasionally, it also manufactures fabrics tailor
made in accordance with requirements of certain mills from yarn
received from these mills. ABC Ltd raises bills of its labour charges only
on mills for converting yarn into fabrics. The auditor of ABC Ltd tries to
ensure that stocks of the company as at year end do not include stocks
pertaining to these mills. Which assertion auditor tries to verify in
above situation:
(a) completeness
(b) Occurrence
(c) rights and obligations
(d) cut -off 2
Ans. (c)
[Link] AFD
(11)
AFD Marks
PART 2
DESCRIPTIVE QUESTIONS
1. Question paper comprises 6 questions. Answer to Question No. 1 is
compulsory and any 4 out of the remaining 5 questions
2. Working notes should form part of the answer.
3. Answers to the questions are to be given only in English except in the case of
candidates who have opted for Hindi Medium. If a candidate has not opted
for Hindi Medium, his/her answers in Hindi will not be evaluated.
4. Maximum Mark 70
1.
(A) Obtaining an understanding of the entity and its environment,
including the entity’s internal control, is a continuous, dynamic process
of gathering, updating and analysing information throughout the audit.
The understanding establishes a frame of reference within which the
auditor plans the audit and exercises professional judgment
throughout the audit. State few areas in which such an understanding
is helpful to auditor. 5
Ans.
Obtaining an understanding of the entity and its environment, including
the entity’s internal control, is a continuous, dynamic process of
gathering, updating and analysing information throughout the audit.
The understanding establishes a frame of reference within which the
auditor plans the audit and exercises professional judgment throughout
the audit, for example, when:
[Link] AFD
(13)
AFD Marks
Ans.
In the given situation, the engagement partner has asked for a cash flow
forecast from management for next twelve months from date of
financial statements. The audit procedures are also nearing completion.
Therefore, purpose of engagement partner in requiring a cash flow
forecast is to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding and
to conclude on appropriateness of management’s use of going concern
basis of accounting in preparation of its financial statements. Further,
his purpose is also to conclude on basis of audit evidence obtained,
whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions
that may cast a significant doubt on ability to entity to continue as a
going concern, and to report in accordance with SA 570.
The significance of testing going concern assumption is due to its effect
on preparation of financial statements. When the use of going concern is
considered as appropriate, assets and liabilities are recorded on the
basis that entity will be able to realize its assets and discharge liabilities
in normal course of business. In case it is not so viewed, financial
statements are prepared on liquidation basis. Hence, testing such an
assumption provides evidence to auditor whether use of such
assumption is appropriate or not.
Two audit procedures in relation to cash flow forecast likely to be
performed
• Evaluate reliability of underlying data generated to prepare the
forecast
• Determine whether there is adequate support for assumptions
underlying the forecast
[Link] AFD P.T.O.
(14)
AFD Marks
AFD Marks
(b) whether the reports of the Internal Auditors for the period under
audit were considered by the statutory auditor.
2.
(A) Following is the extract from Schedule no. 10 of Advances as appearing
in financial statements of branch of anationalized bank for year ending
31st March, 2024.
Schedule 10 – Advances
S. Particulars Amount
No. (In ` Crores)
rounded off
1. Bills Purchased and Discounted 50.00
2. Cash credits, overdrafts and loans 150.00
repayableon demand
3. Term Loans 75.00
Total 275.00
In carrying out audit of above advances as part of statutory audit of
branch, a statutory auditor would obtain evidence about certain
matters. State those matters. 5
Ans.
In carrying out audit of advances, the auditor is primarily concerned
with obtaining evidence about the following: -
(i) Amounts are included in balance sheet in respect of advances
which are outstanding at the date of the balance sheet.
(ii) Advances represent amount due to the bank branch.
(iii) Amounts due to the bank branch are appropriately supported by
[Link] AFD P.T.O.
(16)
AFD Marks
loan documents and other documents as applicable to the nature
of advances.
(iv) There are no unrecorded advances.
(v) The stated basis of valuation of advances is appropriate and
properly applied and the recoverability of advances is recognised
in their valuation.
(vi) The advances are disclosed, classified and described in
accordance with recognised accounting policies and practices and
relevant statutory and regulatory requirements.
(vii) Appropriate provisions towards advances have been made as per
the RBI norms, Accounting Standards and generally accepted
accounting practices.
Ans.
(i) General (IT) Controls: Are a type of internal controls that help in
mitigating risks that arise due to use of information technology
and information systems in a business.
(ii) Material Weakness: A control deficiency or a combination of
deficiencies in internal controls that is important enough to merit
the attention of those charged with governance since there is a
[Link] AFD
(17)
AFD Marks
reasonable possibility that a material misstatement will not be
prevented or detected in a timely manner by management.
(iii) Data processing: Refers to the systematic recording, storage,
retrieval, modification and transformation of electronic data
using information systems.
(C) SQC 1 dwells upon engagement quality control review (EQCR) as part
of system of quality control in a firm.
Why is such a review required? For which type of engagements EQCR is
mandatory?
What should be approach of firm for engagements for which EQCR is
not mandatory? 3+2
Ans.
Significant judgments made in an engagement should be reviewed by an
engagement quality control reviewer for taking an objective view before
the report is issued. Engagement quality control review is mandatory
for all audits of financial statements of listed entities.
In respect of other engagements, firm should devise criteria to determine
cases requiring performance of engagement quality control review.
3.
(A) M/s S R & Associates are the Statutory Auditors of Vanee Textile and
Garments Ltd., a company engaged in the business of manufacturing of
various textile products. The auditor has completed the audit and is in
the process of forming an opinion on the financial statements for the
F.Y. 2023-2024. CA S, the engagement partner, wants to conclude
whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material
[Link] AFD P.T.O.
(18)
AFD Marks
misstatements, whether due to fraud or error. Guide him about the
factors he should consider to reach that conclusion. 5
Ans.
Factors to be considered to form an opinion:
The auditor shall form an opinion on whether the financial statements
are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the applicable
financial reporting framework.
In order to form that opinion, the auditor shall conclude as to whether
the auditor has obtained reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error. That conclusion shall take into account:
(1) whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence has been obtained
(2) whether uncorrected misstatements are material, individually or
in aggregate.
(3) The evaluations required
(i) The auditor shall evaluate whether the financial statements
are prepared in accordance with the requirements of the
applicable financial reporting framework.
(ii) This evaluation shall include consideration of the qualitative
aspects of the entity’s accounting practices, including
indicators of possible bias in management’s judgments.
(B) The working papers of the branch auditor are also the property of the
Principal Auditor and the Management of the Company, so they have
right to access them. State the relevant SA and comment. 4
[Link] AFD
(19)
AFD Marks
Ans.
Ownership of Working Papers: As per SA 230 “Audit Documentation”,
working papers are the property of the auditor. He may at his
discretion, make available portions or extracts from his working paper
to his client. The auditor should adopt reasonable procedures for
custody and confidentiality of his working papers.
An auditor is not required to provide the management/ clients or other
auditors’ access to his working papers. Main auditor of the company does
not have right of access to the working papers of the branch auditor.
In the case of a company, the main auditor has to consider the report of
the branch auditor and has a right to seek clarification and to visit the
branch but cannot ask for the copy of working paper and therefore, the
branch auditor is under no compulsion to give photocopies of his
working paper to the principal auditor.
From above, it is clear that working papers of the branch auditor
are his property only and neither the Principal auditor not
management has right to access that. Therefore, statement given in the
question is incorrect.
[Link] AFD
(21)
AFD Marks
4.
(A) An audit of Expenditure is one of the major components of Government
Audit. In the context of Government Expenditure Audit’, write in brief,
what do you understand by:
(i) Audit against Rules and Orders
(ii) Audit of Sanctions
(iii) Audit against Provision of Funds
(iv) Propriety Audit
(v) Performance Audit. 5
Ans.
Government Expenditure Audit: Audit of government expenditure is
one of the major components of government audit conducted by the
office of C&AG. The basic standards set for audit of expenditure are to
ensure that there is provision of funds authorised by competent
authority fixing the limits within which expenditure can be incurred.
Briefly, these standards are explained below:
(a) Audit against Rules & Orders: The auditor has to see that the
expenditure incurred conforms to the relevant provisions of the
statutory enactment and is in accordance with the financial rules
and regulations framed by the competent authority.
(b) Audit of Sanctions: The auditor has to ensure that each item of
expenditure is covered by a sanction, either general or special,
accorded by the competent authority, authorising such
expenditure.
(c) Audit against Provision of Funds: It contemplates that there is a
[Link] AFD
(23)
AFD Marks
had died without any children. He came to know that he was nominee
of these shares having substantial value. It landed him in a tricky
situation. What should be proper course of action for him? 5
Ans.
When threats to independence exist, the auditor should either desist
from the task or eliminate the threat or at the very least, put in place
safeguards which reduce the threats to an acceptable level.
Holding of shares involves financial interest in the company and is in
nature of self-interest threat. He has come to hold shares due to
nomination made by his distant relative before accepting the
appointment. Considering above, he should take steps to eliminate the
threat by selling shares immediately before accepting appointment.
Holding of shares of the same company for
(C) While conducting audit of VED Ltd., you as an auditor are not only
prevented in completing certain audit procedures but also are not able
to obtain audit evidence even by performing alternative procedures.
How you will deal with this situation? 4
Ans.
As per SA 705, “Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent
Auditor’s Report”, if, after accepting the engagement, the auditor
becomes aware that management has imposed a limitation on the scope
of the audit that the auditor considers likely to result in the need to
express a qualified opinion or to disclaim an opinion on the financial
statements, the auditor shall request that management remove the
limitation.
[Link] AFD P.T.O.
(24)
AFD Marks
If management refuses to remove the limitation, the auditor shall
communicate the matter to those charged with governance, unless all of
those charged with governance are involved in managing the entity and
determine whether it is possible to perform alternative procedures to
obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
If the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence,
the auditor shall determine the implications as follows:
(1) If the auditor concludes that the possible effects on the financial
statements of undetected misstatements, if any, could be material
but not pervasive, the auditor shall qualify the opinion; or
(2) If the auditor concludes that the possible effects on the financial
statements of undetected misstatements, if any, could be both
material and pervasive so that a qualification of the opinion would
be inadequate to communicate the gravity of the situation, the
auditor shall:
(i) Withdraw from the audit, where practicable and possible
under applicable law or regulation; or
(ii) If withdrawal from the audit before issuing the auditor’s report
is not practicable or possible, disclaim an opinion on the
financial statements.
If the auditor withdraws, before withdrawing, the auditor shall
communicate to those charged with governance any matters regarding
misstatements identified during the audit that would have given rise to
a modification of the opinion.
[Link] AFD
(25)
AFD Marks
5.
(A) What is tolerable misstatement and total rate of deviation?
Discussing meaning of completion memorandum, elaborate upon its
importance. 3+2
Ans.
Tolerable misstatement is a monetary amount set by the auditor in
respect of which the auditor seeks to obtain an appropriate level of
assurance that the monetary amount set by the auditor is not exceeded
by the actual misstatement in the population.
When designing a sample, the auditor determines tolerable
misstatement in order to address the risk that the aggregate of
individually immaterial misstatements may cause the financial
statements to be materially misstated and provide a margin for possible
undetected misstatements.
[Link] AFD
(27)
AFD Marks
(c) Verify few purchase invoices of
paper on GST portal.
(d) Trace few purchase invoices of
paper in stock records to ensure
that these have been added to
stocks of raw material.
(C) In a bank, all accounts should be kept within the drawing power and
the sanctioned limit. The accounts which exceed the sanctioned limit or
drawing power should be brought to the notice of the management
regularly. Analyse the following points to be considered in the
computation of drawing power in case of bank audit.
(i) Bank's Duties
(ii) Auditor's concern
(iii) Computation of DP
(iv) Stock audit 4
Ans.
Computation of Drawing Power:
(i) Bank’s Duties: Banks should ensure that drawings in the working
capital account are covered by the adequacy of the current assets.
Drawing power is required to be arrived at based on current stock
statement. However, considering the difficulties of large
borrowers, stock statements relied upon by the banks for
determining drawing power should not be older than three
months. The outstanding in the account based on drawing power
calculated from stock statements older than three months is
[Link] AFD P.T.O.
(28)
AFD Marks
deemed as irregular.
(ii) Auditor’s Concern: The stock statements, quarterly returns and
other statements submitted by the borrower to the bank should
be scrutinized in detail. The audited Annual Report submitted by
the borrower should be scrutinized properly. The monthly stock
statement of the month for which the audited accounts are
prepared and submitted should be compared and the reasons for
deviations, if any, should be ascertained.
(iv) Stock Audit: The stock audit should be carried out by the bank
for all accounts having funded exposure of more than I 5 crores.
Auditors can also advise for stock audit in other cases if the
situation warrants the same. Branches should obtain the stock
audit reports from lead bank in the cases where the Bank is not
leader of the consortium of working capital. The report
submitted by the stock auditors should be reviewed during the
course of the audit and special focus should be given to the
comments made by the stock auditors on valuation of security
and calculation of drawing power.
[Link] AFD
(29)
AFD Marks
6.
(A) CA P is conducting stock audit of a borrower availing cash credit facility
of `100 lacs from branch of a bank. The cash credit facility is against
security of paid stocks and debtors up to 90 days. Margin stipulated is
25% for stocks and 40% for debtors. Following further information is
available as on 31.12.22: -
AFD Marks
• The effect of regulation on entity operations.
(C) M/s Suresh Chandra & Co. has been appointed as an auditor of SC Ltd.
for the financial year 2021-22. CA. Suresh, one of the partners of M/s
Suresh Chandra & Co., completed entire routine audit work by 29th
May, 2022. Unfortunately, on the very next morning, while roving
towards office of SC Ltd. to sign final audit report, he met with a road
accident and died. CA. Chandra, another partner of M/s Suresh Chandra
& Co., therefore, signed the accounts of SC Ltd., without reviewing the
work performed by CA. Suresh. State with reasons whether CA.
Chandra is right in expressing an opinion on financial statements the
audit of which is performed by another auditor. 5
Ans.
Relying on Work Performed by Another Auditor
REVIEW OBJECTIVES
As per SA 220 “Quality Control for an Audit of Financial Statements”, an
engagement partner taking over an audit during the engagement may
apply the review procedures such as the work has been performed in
accordance with professional standards and regulatory and legal
requirements; significant matters have been raised for further
consideration; appropriate consultations have taken place and the
resulting conclusions have been documented and implemented; there is
[Link] AFD
(33)
AFD Marks
a need to revise the nature, timing and extent of work performed; the
work performed supports the conclusions reached and is appropriately
documented; the evidence obtained is sufficient and appropriate to
support the auditor’s report; and the objectives of the engagement
procedures have been achieved.
NO DELEGATION OF ACCOUNTABILITY
Further, one of the basic principles, which govern the auditor’s
professional responsibilities and which should be complied with
wherever an audit is carried, is that when the auditor delegates work to
assistants or uses work performed by other auditor and experts, he will
continue to be responsible for forming and expressing his opinion
on the financial information. However, he will be entitled to rely on
work performed by others, provided he exercises adequate skill and
care and is not aware of any reason to believe that he should not have so
relied. This is the fundamental principle which is ethically required as
per Code of Ethics.
However, the auditor should carefully direct, supervise and review
work delegated. He should obtain reasonable assurance that work
performed by other auditors/experts and assistants is adequate for his
purpose.
CONCLUSION
[Link] AFD