Trapezoidal Shaping in Nuclear Measurement
Trapezoidal Shaping in Nuclear Measurement
In order to improve the performance of digital spectrum measuring instrument, efficient recursive
algorithm is used to achieve fast digital pulse shaping, and real-time trapezoidal pulse instead of
the traditional analog pulse, so that the subsequent amplitude extraction and peak amplitude accu-
mulation processing become easier. According to the experimental verification, realization of this
technique improves the performance of spectrum measuring instrument. Especially the single pulse
trapezoidal shaping technology make the energy resolution of the spectrum measuring instrument
significantly improved.
Keywords: Recursive Algorithm, Single Pulse Trapezoidal Shaping, Digital, Energy Resolution.
4510 J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 2016, Vol. 13, No. 7 1546-1955/2016/13/4510/005 doi:10.1166/jctn.2016.5312
Wang et al. Research of Single Pulse Trapezoidal Shaping Algorithm in Digital Nuclear Spectrum Measurement
RESEARCH ARTICLE
and then apply the results to the discrete time domain.
Assuming the output function st is a linear time-
Vo
T1 ≤ t ≤ T2 . Use this way to define the time T3 = T2 + T1 , Where vn is the amplitude of n, l is the length of the
Eq. (9) can be written as the following three independent convolution function, vn − l is the amplitude of n which
equations.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE
as measuring characteristic X-ray of the sample, the use
Voltage(mV)
100
of continuous pulse shaping methods obtains the energy
80
resolution is just about 180 eV.
60
Based on this, this study proposes using single pulse 40
shaping instead of continuous pulse shaping. The so- 20
called single pulse shaping refers to the process of pulse 0
shaping, when a complete pulse shaping after the com- –20
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
pletion of the recursive accumulated value of zero and
then forming the next pulse. Using single pulse shap- Time(uS)
ing method to deal with the same sample, the energy Fig. 4. Pulse signal after simulation Gaussian shaping.
resolution is about 165 eV, which has improved signif-
icantly. Experiments demonstrate the superiority of this
Table I. Comparison of different forming modes test of 55
Fe (detector
method. nominal resolution is 156 eV).
200 nals obtained from the experiment system for actual test-
150 ing, in which Figure 2 is measured using a trapezoidal
100 shaped pulse signal; Figure 3 is measured using a trian-
50 gular shaped pulse signal; Figure 4 is the use of simula-
0 tion Gaussian shaped pulse signal. As can be seen from
–50 these three figures, trapezoidal shape fall time shorter than
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Gaussian shape, which more suitable for high count rate.
Time(uS)
In these three different forming modes, the energy res-
Fig. 2. Pulse signal after trapezoidal shaping. olution of the instrument is listed in Table I.
Nuclear measuring instruments using single pulse trape-
1000
zoidal shaping (triangular shaping) compared with the use
of Gaussian shaping, the energy resolution has greatly
800 improved.
Voltage(mV)
600
400 6. CONCLUSIONS
This study introduces the function of convolution method
200
is used to realize the trapezoidal shaping, establishes the
0 mathematical model of trapezoidal shaping and recur-
sive algorithm in time domain. Through simulation, sum-
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
marizes the practical problems encountered in shaping.
Time(uS)
Aiming at these problems, the algorithm model is opti-
Fig. 3. Pulse signal after triangular shaping. mized to improve, and the single pulse trapezoidal shaping
advantages:
Netherlands (1973).
First, compared with the analog forming, it will reduce 2. V. T. Jordanov and G. F. Knoll, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 345, 337
hardware costs, improve the system stability and ease of (1994).
system maintenance and upgrade. 3. H. Koeman, Nuclear Instruments and Methods 123, 181 (1975).
Second, compared with a Gaussian shaping, the forming 4. F. Hilsenrath, H. D. Voss, and J. C. Bakke, IEEE Transactions on
Nuclear Seience 32, 145 (1984).
time of trapezoidal shaping is shorter. Trapezoidal shaping
5. R. E. Chrien and R. J. Sutter, Nuclear Instruments and methods in
improve the system count rate at the same time ensure that Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors
energy resolution do not decline. A 249, 421 (1986).
Third, the width of the trapezoidal shaping can be real- 6. J. Puncochar, Transactions of the VSB-Technical University Ostrava
time adjustment, which matches the input pulse form- 5, 232 (1995).
7. Y. Zhao, Y. Cai, and X. Yang, Thermal Science 3, 20 (2016).
ing time. It suit different measurement occasions when
8. V. T. Jordanov and G. F. Knoll, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Sci-
equipped with different detectors, to achieve the require- ence 42, 683 (1995).
ment of the high count rate or high energy resolution. 9. Y. Zhao, Y. Cai, and D. Cheng, Multimedia Tools and Applications
Fourth, the single pulse shaping method is proposed for 19, 33 (2016).
the first time, and it is a further research on the existing 10. T. Valentin and G. F. Knoll, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in
Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors
convolution method. It avoids the influence of cumulative and Associated Equipment A345, 337 (1994).
error, which does a help to improve the energy resolution 11. S. G. Chen, S. Y. Ji, and W. S. Liu, Acta Phys. Sin.-.Ch. Ed. 57, 2882
of nuclear measuring instruments. (2008).